正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

imessage iphone text argument between two people where the receiver viewer keeps spamming pizza rat stickers over the texts / not listening disagree disagreement not serious unserious discussion discuss loud dubstep plays in the background / reaction video meme

himejofries 👩‍❤️‍💋‍👩 🐈 🍟

35,486 subscribers

54,598 次观看 • 21 天前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

🚨 Serious Questions Over Viral Video! A video is rapidly going viral on social media. It is being claimed that the video was recorded inside the IO room of Najafgarh Police Station, where some foreign women are seen making a video inside the room. A Delhi Police sticker is also visible on the door in the background. We do not confirm the authenticity or location of this video. However, if the video and the claims surrounding it are genuine, the matter appears serious and warrants an impartial investigation. Delhi Police is requested to verify the viral video and establish the facts. If any wrongdoing is found, appropriate action should be taken. Delhi Police CP Delhi #DilKiPolice Please investigate the matter and clarify the facts so that the truth can be distinguished from rumours

🚨 Serious Questions Over Viral Video! A video is rapidly going viral on social media. It is being claimed that the video was recorded inside the IO room of Najafgarh Police Station, where some foreign women are seen making a video inside the room. A Delhi Police sticker is also visible on the door in the background. We do not confirm the authenticity or location of this video. However, if the video and the claims surrounding it are genuine, the matter appears serious and warrants an impartial investigation. Delhi Police is requested to verify the viral video and establish the facts. If any wrongdoing is found, appropriate action should be taken. Delhi Police CP Delhi #DilKiPolice Please investigate the matter and clarify the facts so that the truth can be distinguished from rumours

Sahil chabra

65,435 次观看 • 1 个月前

My friend quit his $180K tech job last month. Everyone called him insane. Yesterday he sent me a screenshot. No text. Just a wallet. anoin123. Joined December. Two months ago. $1,501,199 profit. 182 predictions. That is $8,248 per decision. Not per day. Per click. I asked him what the strategy was. He said one sentence: He does not predict more. He predicts better. → Wallet: 182 trades in two months. That is roughly 3 per day. While everyone else fires 50 positions hoping something sticks, this wallet waits. Biggest single win: $173,000. Currently holding $4.1 million in open positions. Not closed. Active. Right now. The profit curve does not spike and crash. It climbs like stairs. Controlled. Calculated. I spent three hours going through the positions. No meme markets. No lottery tickets. Just high conviction plays with serious size. $173K on one satisfactory yes. Most people lose because they trade like it is a casino. This wallet treats it like a sniper rifle. One shot. One kill. My friend still has not told me if he is copying or just watching. But he also has not gone back to his desk. Some people work 12 months for what this wallet made in 60 days. Maybe the crazy one was not the guy who quit.

My friend quit his $180K tech job last month. Everyone called him insane. Yesterday he sent me a screenshot. No text. Just a wallet. anoin123. Joined December. Two months ago. $1,501,199 profit. 182 predictions. That is $8,248 per decision. Not per day. Per click. I asked him what the strategy was. He said one sentence: He does not predict more. He predicts better. → Wallet: 182 trades in two months. That is roughly 3 per day. While everyone else fires 50 positions hoping something sticks, this wallet waits. Biggest single win: $173,000. Currently holding $4.1 million in open positions. Not closed. Active. Right now. The profit curve does not spike and crash. It climbs like stairs. Controlled. Calculated. I spent three hours going through the positions. No meme markets. No lottery tickets. Just high conviction plays with serious size. $173K on one satisfactory yes. Most people lose because they trade like it is a casino. This wallet treats it like a sniper rifle. One shot. One kill. My friend still has not told me if he is copying or just watching. But he also has not gone back to his desk. Some people work 12 months for what this wallet made in 60 days. Maybe the crazy one was not the guy who quit.

Marlow

98,325 次观看 • 7 个月前

As I sit here in DC this week, we are closer to something I was not sure I would ever see. I have been working in this industry since 2015. For most of those years, the defining feature of crypto in Washington was not policy. It was the absence of it. A gray zone where serious people built serious things under a constant cloud, never quite sure which rules applied or whether the ground would move beneath them. This week the CLARITY Act sits on the Senate calendar. A federal framework for digital asset market structure, the thing this industry has wanted for the better part of a decade, is closer than it has ever been. It is not law yet, and there are real hurdles left. But the distance between where we stood a few years ago and where we are sitting today is hard to put into words. I keep thinking about the work that got us here. Over the past year I watched Chainlink move from outside these conversations to inside them. Sergey at the White House for the signing of the GENIUS Act. The Department of Commerce putting government economic data onchain. Meetings with the SEC that became real interpretive guidance. Conversations with the lawmakers now writing the rules. None of that happens by accident. It happens because people keep showing up, year after year, and make the case in rooms where it is not yet obvious. And there is something fitting in it. The entire premise of what we build is verification. Making truth provable. Removing the question of what is real. The work here in DC is the same thing in a different form. Trading a decade of ambiguity for something the industry has never actually had. We are not at the finish line. But sitting here, it is hard not to feel the weight of it. The gray zone is ending. What comes next is something this industry has never had. Clarity.

As I sit here in DC this week, we are closer to something I was not sure I would ever see. I have been working in this industry since 2015. For most of those years, the defining feature of crypto in Washington was not policy. It was the absence of it. A gray zone where serious people built serious things under a constant cloud, never quite sure which rules applied or whether the ground would move beneath them. This week the CLARITY Act sits on the Senate calendar. A federal framework for digital asset market structure, the thing this industry has wanted for the better part of a decade, is closer than it has ever been. It is not law yet, and there are real hurdles left. But the distance between where we stood a few years ago and where we are sitting today is hard to put into words. I keep thinking about the work that got us here. Over the past year I watched Chainlink move from outside these conversations to inside them. Sergey at the White House for the signing of the GENIUS Act. The Department of Commerce putting government economic data onchain. Meetings with the SEC that became real interpretive guidance. Conversations with the lawmakers now writing the rules. None of that happens by accident. It happens because people keep showing up, year after year, and make the case in rooms where it is not yet obvious. And there is something fitting in it. The entire premise of what we build is verification. Making truth provable. Removing the question of what is real. The work here in DC is the same thing in a different form. Trading a decade of ambiguity for something the industry has never actually had. We are not at the finish line. But sitting here, it is hard not to feel the weight of it. The gray zone is ending. What comes next is something this industry has never had. Clarity.

Chris Barrett

14,798 次观看 • 3 个月前

I FOUND A BEACH ACCOUNT WITH 900K FOLLOWERS POSTING GOLDEN HOUR BIKINI VIDEOS FROM A TROPICAL ISLAND. I RECOGNIZED THE BUTTERFLY. IT IS THE SAME TATTOO FROM THE 7-ELEVEN GIRL. SAME OPERATOR. DIFFERENT BODY. Blue micro bikini. Butterfly tattoo on the chest. Text tattoo on the ribs. Roses on the arms. She is standing on a tropical beach at golden hour. Sand. Water. Driftwood. Trees behind her. The sun is low and backlights her from the right. Haze in the air. She moves slowly. Adjusts the top. Runs her hands through her hair. Lifts her arms above her head. Twelve seconds. It looks like a photographer's reel from Tulum. I have seen that butterfly before. The 7-Eleven girl. Different face. Different body. Different hair. Same butterfly on the same spot on the chest. Same wings. Same position between the collarbones. Two accounts. Two "girls." One tattoo pulled from the same prompt. The golden hour is not aesthetic. It is camouflage. Backlight creates lens flare. Lens flare softens edges. Soft edges hide the places where AI skin meets AI hair and the render breaks down. Every frame has a warm haze across it that the viewer reads as "cinematic" and the operator uses as a filter to cover artifacts. This is not a girl filmed at sunset. This is a render passed through the sun. The bikini is the smallest amount of fabric the algorithm will not flag. The strings are nearly invisible. The triangles cover the minimum. The operator did not pick blue for aesthetics. Blue metallic fabric catches golden hour light and shifts color between frames. It goes from royal blue to purple to copper depending on the angle. The viewer's eye tracks the color shift the way it tracked the metallic bikini in the mirror clip. The fabric is the distraction. The skin is the content. She never faces the camera straight on. In twelve seconds she is always turned fifteen degrees to the side. Profile shots. Three-quarter shots. One moment where she raises her arms and looks at the camera but her chin is tilted down so her eyes are in shadow. The operator learned what the mirror girl knew and what the car girl knew. Straight angles break AI faces. Every other angle sells them. The text tattoo on her ribs says something in cursive. It is readable in one frame, blurred in the next, and different in the third. The words change mid-video. Real ink does not rewrite itself. Prompts do. But nobody pauses a golden hour beach video to read a rib tattoo. The operator knows the viewer is not looking at the ribs. The driftwood on the sand behind her is the same log in every frame. But the sand around it changes. The waterline shifts forward in one cut and backward in the next. Real tides do not reverse in twelve seconds. The beach is a backdrop that was rendered once and the water was animated on top of it without tracking the continuity. The butterfly connects everything. The 7-Eleven. The beach. Two characters that were never in the same prompt but came from the same operator who never changed the tattoo line. One detail. One mistake. Two accounts exposed. That beach has never had a sunset. That sand has never been wet. But the butterfly is still the same.

framexin

13,921 次观看 • 25 天前

Yeah. The artist shared this video with me, and accusing someone of using AI without any proof is not cool. We are all against generative AI, but it becomes a serious issue when people can’t tell the difference between human mistakes and AI, because that only fuels the narrative that AI can replace artists. If you’re wondering about the extra hand: James’s dad wasn’t included in the first version by mistake, and when we asked the artist to add him, they had to reposition some hands and forgot to remove the extra one. As for the line thickness, for greetings we don’t work with vectors, and as for the background it includes textured pixel images adapted in perspective to the space.

Yeah. The artist shared this video with me, and accusing someone of using AI without any proof is not cool. We are all against generative AI, but it becomes a serious issue when people can’t tell the difference between human mistakes and AI, because that only fuels the narrative that AI can replace artists. If you’re wondering about the extra hand: James’s dad wasn’t included in the first version by mistake, and when we asked the artist to add him, they had to reposition some hands and forgot to remove the extra one. As for the line thickness, for greetings we don’t work with vectors, and as for the background it includes textured pixel images adapted in perspective to the space.

Jared | Disventure Camp Showrunner

34,267 次观看 • 9 个月前

Two women are carrying women's basketball on their backs right now, and neither one of them works in the league office. Caitlin Clark brought the audience. That is not a talking point, it is arithmetic. She moved ratings, sold out arenas, and dragged a league that had been ignored for twenty-five years into the center of American sports conversation. The new CBA that lifted the minimum salary above 300,000 dollars and quadrupled the cap does not happen without the money she generated. Every player in that league got a raise because one woman from Iowa would not miss. Sophie Cunningham gave the audience a reason to stay. She said girls should not have to compete against males. She said she was offering truth alongside love, not hate. One sentence, said plainly, in a sport where almost nobody in authority will say anything plainly. And she has been standing in the open taking incoming ever since, while the institution she plays for has not managed to say her name. Look at what happened to the people who showed up for her. Two sixteen year old girls wore XX-XY shirts to a Storm game and held a sign that said thank you Sophie for speaking up for girls. They were booed. A fan yelled security, take the trash out. Two women tried to trip one of them in the aisle. A team co-owner screamed obscenities at them until one of them cried. The league fined that owner and suspended her five home games, which means the league conceded every fact of it. Teenagers. In an arena. For a t-shirt. So think about the actual scoreboard here. Clark built the market. Cunningham defended the category the market exists to watch. Between them they have done more for women's sport in three seasons than a generation of committee statements. And the league's contribution has been a deleted gambling video, a suspended owner, and a head coach who said she was not educated enough from a scientific standpoint to answer whether males belong in the women's game. She coaches women for a living. The cape in this picture is a joke. The job is not. Somebody has to stand between little girls and the people who decided that protecting their category is a controversial opinion. Right now that somebody is a shooting guard from Missouri who was not asking for the assignment. Back your players. They are the only reason anyone is watching. Write that down. 🦋

Two women are carrying women's basketball on their backs right now, and neither one of them works in the league office. Caitlin Clark brought the audience. That is not a talking point, it is arithmetic. She moved ratings, sold out arenas, and dragged a league that had been ignored for twenty-five years into the center of American sports conversation. The new CBA that lifted the minimum salary above 300,000 dollars and quadrupled the cap does not happen without the money she generated. Every player in that league got a raise because one woman from Iowa would not miss. Sophie Cunningham gave the audience a reason to stay. She said girls should not have to compete against males. She said she was offering truth alongside love, not hate. One sentence, said plainly, in a sport where almost nobody in authority will say anything plainly. And she has been standing in the open taking incoming ever since, while the institution she plays for has not managed to say her name. Look at what happened to the people who showed up for her. Two sixteen year old girls wore XX-XY shirts to a Storm game and held a sign that said thank you Sophie for speaking up for girls. They were booed. A fan yelled security, take the trash out. Two women tried to trip one of them in the aisle. A team co-owner screamed obscenities at them until one of them cried. The league fined that owner and suspended her five home games, which means the league conceded every fact of it. Teenagers. In an arena. For a t-shirt. So think about the actual scoreboard here. Clark built the market. Cunningham defended the category the market exists to watch. Between them they have done more for women's sport in three seasons than a generation of committee statements. And the league's contribution has been a deleted gambling video, a suspended owner, and a head coach who said she was not educated enough from a scientific standpoint to answer whether males belong in the women's game. She coaches women for a living. The cape in this picture is a joke. The job is not. Somebody has to stand between little girls and the people who decided that protecting their category is a controversial opinion. Right now that somebody is a shooting guard from Missouri who was not asking for the assignment. Back your players. They are the only reason anyone is watching. Write that down. 🦋

Selene Mariposa

45,051 次观看 • 1 个月前

When History Warns Us, We Must Not Ignore It We never expected the Chief Minister of Keralam to take such a position under any circumstances. But on this issue, we need to look back at history. Because the people of Keralam have every right to ask: whose political pressure is behind this decision of the Chief Minister? When we examine the history of Vande Mataram, one thing becomes clear. This is not a political issue that emerged yesterday. During India’s freedom struggle, Vande Mataram became a symbol of national consciousness and the spirit of freedom for millions of Indians. The Muslim League was formed in 1906. During the 1930s, opposition to certain portions of Vande Mataram became increasingly prominent among sections of Muslim political leadership, including the Muslim League. In 1937, the Congress moved towards adopting the first two stanzas of Vande Mataram for official occasions. This remains an important episode in our history. But one thing must be made absolutely clear. This is not an allegation against the Muslim community. Many Muslims participated wholeheartedly in India’s freedom struggle and sang Vande Mataram as part of the national movement. Therefore, today’s debate is not against any religion. It is a debate about political positions concerning nationalism. But history also raises another important question. In 1937, political opposition emerged over the use of Vande Mataram. Subsequently, the politics demanding the partition of India became stronger, and ultimately, in 1947, the country was divided. That is why, when in 2026 a position is being taken in Keralam that Vande Mataram need not be sung, a natural question arises: Where will such political compromises take us? What will the state of Keralam’s national consciousness be ten years from now? If we begin making political compromises over one national symbol today, what will prevent similar compromises on other national symbols tomorrow? That is the question Keralam needs to debate today. We have even witnessed situations where a teacher faced serious consequences merely because a question about Veer Savarkar was included in a quiz competition. When a historical figure, an idea, or a national song becomes subject to political pressure, it should concern every democratic society. That is why the BJP is bringing Muhammad Ali Jinnah into this discussion today. This is not a discussion about one individual. It is not a discussion about one religion. Nor is it a discussion against any community. It is a discussion about the future of nationalism. If we want to ensure that history does not repeat itself, we must learn from history. Those who say today that Vande Mataram need not be sung—who can guarantee that tomorrow they will not question another national symbol? If we continue surrendering our national values to political pressure, what we ultimately stand to lose will not merely be the words of a song—it will be our sense of national unity. Therefore, our message to the Chief Minister of Keralam is very clear: Do not surrender nationalism to political pressure. No one needs anyone’s permission to sing Vande Mataram in Keralam. Every Indian has the right to embrace this national song, which inspired the freedom struggle of our country. Even if you do not sing it, Keralam will sing it. Even if you exclude it from government programmes, the BJP will ensure that Vande Mataram and the National Anthem are sung across Keralam. Because the Bharatiya Janata Party will stand at the forefront to protect the national consciousness of this land. As long as Narendra Modi leads this country, we will not allow politics opposed to India’s unity and integrity to take root on this soil. There will be no compromise on nationalism in Keralam. When history warns us, we must not ignore it. We must learn from history. We must not allow history to repeat itself. My greetings and congratulations to the Yuva Morcha for organising this programme.

When History Warns Us, We Must Not Ignore It We never expected the Chief Minister of Keralam to take such a position under any circumstances. But on this issue, we need to look back at history. Because the people of Keralam have every right to ask: whose political pressure is behind this decision of the Chief Minister? When we examine the history of Vande Mataram, one thing becomes clear. This is not a political issue that emerged yesterday. During India’s freedom struggle, Vande Mataram became a symbol of national consciousness and the spirit of freedom for millions of Indians. The Muslim League was formed in 1906. During the 1930s, opposition to certain portions of Vande Mataram became increasingly prominent among sections of Muslim political leadership, including the Muslim League. In 1937, the Congress moved towards adopting the first two stanzas of Vande Mataram for official occasions. This remains an important episode in our history. But one thing must be made absolutely clear. This is not an allegation against the Muslim community. Many Muslims participated wholeheartedly in India’s freedom struggle and sang Vande Mataram as part of the national movement. Therefore, today’s debate is not against any religion. It is a debate about political positions concerning nationalism. But history also raises another important question. In 1937, political opposition emerged over the use of Vande Mataram. Subsequently, the politics demanding the partition of India became stronger, and ultimately, in 1947, the country was divided. That is why, when in 2026 a position is being taken in Keralam that Vande Mataram need not be sung, a natural question arises: Where will such political compromises take us? What will the state of Keralam’s national consciousness be ten years from now? If we begin making political compromises over one national symbol today, what will prevent similar compromises on other national symbols tomorrow? That is the question Keralam needs to debate today. We have even witnessed situations where a teacher faced serious consequences merely because a question about Veer Savarkar was included in a quiz competition. When a historical figure, an idea, or a national song becomes subject to political pressure, it should concern every democratic society. That is why the BJP is bringing Muhammad Ali Jinnah into this discussion today. This is not a discussion about one individual. It is not a discussion about one religion. Nor is it a discussion against any community. It is a discussion about the future of nationalism. If we want to ensure that history does not repeat itself, we must learn from history. Those who say today that Vande Mataram need not be sung—who can guarantee that tomorrow they will not question another national symbol? If we continue surrendering our national values to political pressure, what we ultimately stand to lose will not merely be the words of a song—it will be our sense of national unity. Therefore, our message to the Chief Minister of Keralam is very clear: Do not surrender nationalism to political pressure. No one needs anyone’s permission to sing Vande Mataram in Keralam. Every Indian has the right to embrace this national song, which inspired the freedom struggle of our country. Even if you do not sing it, Keralam will sing it. Even if you exclude it from government programmes, the BJP will ensure that Vande Mataram and the National Anthem are sung across Keralam. Because the Bharatiya Janata Party will stand at the forefront to protect the national consciousness of this land. As long as Narendra Modi leads this country, we will not allow politics opposed to India’s unity and integrity to take root on this soil. There will be no compromise on nationalism in Keralam. When history warns us, we must not ignore it. We must learn from history. We must not allow history to repeat itself. My greetings and congratulations to the Yuva Morcha for organising this programme.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar 🇮🇳

13,916 次观看 • 1 个月前

Kaitlan Collins Says It’s Not About Her… Then Goes on Jon Stewart to Talk About Herself Kaitlan Collins sat down with Jon Stewart and insisted that President Trump’s comments about her are not personal. “I’ve always felt this, regardless of who’s the president, whether it’s Joe Biden, Donald Trump. It’s really not about me, and I don’t want it to be about my reaction. And so I think if you let it become about that, then it becomes a back and forth between the two of us. I just think in those moments, it’s important to put the reminder back on the work, on the question, and on the non-answers that we get.” (Video: AI) Yet she still went on The Daily Show to discuss those very comments in detail. Collins is one of CNN’s highest-paid stars, with a reported salary of around $3.5 million a year and an estimated net worth of $6 million. The constant attention from President Trump has only raised her profile further. If anything, she should be thanking him.

Paul A. Szypula 🇺🇸

30,880 次观看 • 2 个月前

So Kate, NOW it’s "I love this album" about Harry his KATTDO release, NOW you’re dancing to Dance No More, NOW you’re suddenly listening to Zayn his newest song Sideways… and I’m supposed to believe this is genuine? Because let’s not rewrite history here. You NEVER engaged with any of them. Not once. Not when Louis had the premiere of All of Those Voices, not when Niall and Liam were literally together, not at any point where it would’ve actually made sense. No support, no acknowledgment, nothing. Just silence. But now suddenly it’s loud? And what makes it even worse is you couldn’t even show HALF of this energy for your own "love of your life" Liam when he released music. No proper posts, no real support, nothing consistent. But suddenly for Harry and Zayn you’re present, expressive, engaged? Be serious. And let’s be very clear… you’re not winning directioners over with this. You’re not winning solo fans over either. You don’t get to suddenly tap into their music after everything, after the silence, after lying about being a One Direction fan, and expect people to just accept it like it’s normal. It’s not. This isn’t you "finding the music." This is you picking and choosing when to care depending on what benefits you, what gets attention, what keeps you relevant. The pattern is obvious: ignore it when it’s real, show up when it’s convenient. You don’t get to be silent when it mattered and then act like you’re part of it now. That’s not support, that’s opportunistic behaviour. And people DO notice. #JusticeForLiam

So Kate, NOW it’s "I love this album" about Harry his KATTDO release, NOW you’re dancing to Dance No More, NOW you’re suddenly listening to Zayn his newest song Sideways… and I’m supposed to believe this is genuine? Because let’s not rewrite history here. You NEVER engaged with any of them. Not once. Not when Louis had the premiere of All of Those Voices, not when Niall and Liam were literally together, not at any point where it would’ve actually made sense. No support, no acknowledgment, nothing. Just silence. But now suddenly it’s loud? And what makes it even worse is you couldn’t even show HALF of this energy for your own "love of your life" Liam when he released music. No proper posts, no real support, nothing consistent. But suddenly for Harry and Zayn you’re present, expressive, engaged? Be serious. And let’s be very clear… you’re not winning directioners over with this. You’re not winning solo fans over either. You don’t get to suddenly tap into their music after everything, after the silence, after lying about being a One Direction fan, and expect people to just accept it like it’s normal. It’s not. This isn’t you "finding the music." This is you picking and choosing when to care depending on what benefits you, what gets attention, what keeps you relevant. The pattern is obvious: ignore it when it’s real, show up when it’s convenient. You don’t get to be silent when it mattered and then act like you’re part of it now. That’s not support, that’s opportunistic behaviour. And people DO notice. #JusticeForLiam

Iris

42,007 次观看 • 6 个月前

AN 18-YEAR-OLD WITH $30 IN AI TOOLS CAN NOW TURN YOUTUBE SLOP INTO A $17K/MONTH MACHINE The video says the quiet part out loud. Kid flexing next to two expensive cars with the caption: POV you are 18 and make AI slop on YT. It looks like a meme. It is also the business model. The article breaks down why. You do not need a face, studio, editor, camera or original genius. You need a high-RPM niche, Claude for scripts, ElevenLabs for voice, CapCut for assembly, and enough discipline to ship 3-4 videos a week. Finance at 500K views/month can pull around $10K from AdSense. Entertainment at the same traffic might do $3K - $4K Same attention, different payout. That is what people miss about “AI slop.” The content can be mediocre and the economics can still be excellent if the niche pays, the cadence holds, and affiliate or sponsor money sits on top. The kid in the video is not flexing because the content is beautiful. He is flexing because YouTube does not pay for taste. It pays for watch time in expensive categories, and AI made the factory cheap enough for teenagers to run.

AN 18-YEAR-OLD WITH $30 IN AI TOOLS CAN NOW TURN YOUTUBE SLOP INTO A $17K/MONTH MACHINE The video says the quiet part out loud. Kid flexing next to two expensive cars with the caption: POV you are 18 and make AI slop on YT. It looks like a meme. It is also the business model. The article breaks down why. You do not need a face, studio, editor, camera or original genius. You need a high-RPM niche, Claude for scripts, ElevenLabs for voice, CapCut for assembly, and enough discipline to ship 3-4 videos a week. Finance at 500K views/month can pull around $10K from AdSense. Entertainment at the same traffic might do $3K - $4K Same attention, different payout. That is what people miss about “AI slop.” The content can be mediocre and the economics can still be excellent if the niche pays, the cadence holds, and affiliate or sponsor money sits on top. The kid in the video is not flexing because the content is beautiful. He is flexing because YouTube does not pay for taste. It pays for watch time in expensive categories, and AI made the factory cheap enough for teenagers to run.

Nekt0

20,557 次观看 • 3 个月前

Dear friends, thanks to your wholehearted support! The Liver Doctor book is now: #1 in Bestsellers in Health/Fitness on Amazon #6 in Bestsellers in Overall Books on Amazon #2 in Hot New Releases on Amazon #2 in Movers and Shakers on Amazon HarperCollins I really appreciate your love and interest in my book. Let is take it to #1 so that people will read it and benefit from the content I wrote for you all, burning the midnight oil over 100s of days. This is not one of those only nice looking book you will have the chance to own, but a whole world of true medicine in true detective style that will affect you to the core. Like I quote in my Chapter Two: "Time does not fly, and we cannot go back. Time does not heal, we adjust."— From Chapter Two, Juniper's Last Whimper. The paperback copy is available for pre-order on Amazon India while the Kindle version is up for pre-order everywhere: I also have some announcements: I am available for interviews, podcast sessions, media features, talks and panel discussions based on my works and sorrounding this book in general. We can discuss science, pseudoscience, medicine, alternative medicine, and everything that I do and keep doing in the background of what this book has to offer. Interested parties, people (or persons) or groups, please contact me at: theliverdr (at) gmail (dot) com - please also CC Shabnam.srivastava@harpercollins.co.in

Dear friends, thanks to your wholehearted support! The Liver Doctor book is now: #1 in Bestsellers in Health/Fitness on Amazon #6 in Bestsellers in Overall Books on Amazon #2 in Hot New Releases on Amazon #2 in Movers and Shakers on Amazon HarperCollins I really appreciate your love and interest in my book. Let is take it to #1 so that people will read it and benefit from the content I wrote for you all, burning the midnight oil over 100s of days. This is not one of those only nice looking book you will have the chance to own, but a whole world of true medicine in true detective style that will affect you to the core. Like I quote in my Chapter Two: "Time does not fly, and we cannot go back. Time does not heal, we adjust."— From Chapter Two, Juniper's Last Whimper. The paperback copy is available for pre-order on Amazon India while the Kindle version is up for pre-order everywhere: I also have some announcements: I am available for interviews, podcast sessions, media features, talks and panel discussions based on my works and sorrounding this book in general. We can discuss science, pseudoscience, medicine, alternative medicine, and everything that I do and keep doing in the background of what this book has to offer. Interested parties, people (or persons) or groups, please contact me at: theliverdr (at) gmail (dot) com - please also CC [email protected]

TheLiverDoc™

80,190 次观看 • 5 个月前

Tragic News Involving Ilebaye and Her Family💔💔💔 Big Brother All Stars winner, Ilebaye, went live on Instagram crying for help. Her face was visibly swollen. In the live video, an elderly man could be seen aggressively beating her, while teenage boys in the background begged him not to harm her. A Twitter Space was later held where a lady identified as Meme revealed that Ilebaye’s mother had endured years of abuse in the marriage before fleeing with her daughters in 2024. Meme also said Ilebaye mother endured 20years of abuse before finally leaving in 2024. It’s was also said the man had another woman in the house. According to Meme and YimYim, the father allowed the mother to leave with the girls but refused to give her custody of the boys. The boys later reached out to Ilebaye, saying they were not living well. When Ilebaye told her mother, she warned her not to return to the house because their father is powerful and dangerous. Her mother advised that if she must go, she should inform the public and go live on Instagram. Ilebaye, who was supposed to celebrate her birthday yesterday, decided to visit the house for the sake of her brothers. She hoped her father would be gentle with her because it was her birthday. Instead, she was severely beaten. Beauty Tukura, Liquorose, Tacha, and other influencers called for help online. They begged anyone in Abuja to assist her and asked for her father’s house address. A Twitter user quickly posted the address and contact details of the house. Tacha also revealed that she had often wondered why Ilebaye was not very active online. She sometimes questioned her without knowing she was dealing with serious family issues. YimYim said police officers were present in the compound but could not do anything because they knew the father was a violent man with connections. Meme added that when they contacted the Commissioner of Police and other officers, they were told it was a “family issue” and that the man always wins due to his power and influence. The matter had been reported many times before. After Ilebaye’s live video ended, the father reportedly refused the police entry and released dogs at the gate. Meme and YimYim also stated that Ilebaye suffered broken bones and possible internal injuries. However, Beauty later revealed that Ilebaye had finally been rescued, though Ilebaye herself is yet to speak publicly. Meme also said Ilebaye was also apologizing to her fans for involving them in her family matters. The harsh tag #freeIlebaye is also trending We wish her a quick recovery and hope she gets better soon. ❤️‍🩹

Tragic News Involving Ilebaye and Her Family💔💔💔 Big Brother All Stars winner, Ilebaye, went live on Instagram crying for help. Her face was visibly swollen. In the live video, an elderly man could be seen aggressively beating her, while teenage boys in the background begged him not to harm her. A Twitter Space was later held where a lady identified as Meme revealed that Ilebaye’s mother had endured years of abuse in the marriage before fleeing with her daughters in 2024. Meme also said Ilebaye mother endured 20years of abuse before finally leaving in 2024. It’s was also said the man had another woman in the house. According to Meme and YimYim, the father allowed the mother to leave with the girls but refused to give her custody of the boys. The boys later reached out to Ilebaye, saying they were not living well. When Ilebaye told her mother, she warned her not to return to the house because their father is powerful and dangerous. Her mother advised that if she must go, she should inform the public and go live on Instagram. Ilebaye, who was supposed to celebrate her birthday yesterday, decided to visit the house for the sake of her brothers. She hoped her father would be gentle with her because it was her birthday. Instead, she was severely beaten. Beauty Tukura, Liquorose, Tacha, and other influencers called for help online. They begged anyone in Abuja to assist her and asked for her father’s house address. A Twitter user quickly posted the address and contact details of the house. Tacha also revealed that she had often wondered why Ilebaye was not very active online. She sometimes questioned her without knowing she was dealing with serious family issues. YimYim said police officers were present in the compound but could not do anything because they knew the father was a violent man with connections. Meme added that when they contacted the Commissioner of Police and other officers, they were told it was a “family issue” and that the man always wins due to his power and influence. The matter had been reported many times before. After Ilebaye’s live video ended, the father reportedly refused the police entry and released dogs at the gate. Meme and YimYim also stated that Ilebaye suffered broken bones and possible internal injuries. However, Beauty later revealed that Ilebaye had finally been rescued, though Ilebaye herself is yet to speak publicly. Meme also said Ilebaye was also apologizing to her fans for involving them in her family matters. The harsh tag #freeIlebaye is also trending We wish her a quick recovery and hope she gets better soon. ❤️‍🩹

Idanssssssss😝😝

194,598 次观看 • 4 个月前

Two girls, arms overhead all day, plastering a ceiling in perfect sync and it makes them around $12,000 a month between them, mostly from filming it. Anyone who's done overhead work knows it's the worst position in the trade — arms up, neck back, shoulders burning inside ten minutes. Most people tap out. These two do it for hours, side by side, matching each other's pace like they share a brain. That's the thing you can't look away from: not just that it's two women on a ceiling, but that they're in rhythm doing the part everyone else dreads. Here's why the pair matters more than people think. A solo worker is a clip you watch once. Two people moving in sync — no talking, just anticipating each other — is a relationship, and relationships are what turn a viewer into a follower. You're not watching a task get done. You're watching a partnership work, and that pulls people back for the next one. The money runs three ways off one phone. Their calendar stays booked because homeowners watch the finish and hire them at full rate, zero ad spend — the video sells the work. Tool and material brands pay $3 - 5k a post to get their gear in genuinely skilled hands. And views, often 5-10 million a clip, stack payouts on a phone one of them wedges on a bucket. Neither of them edits. They film the shift, hand it to AI, it grabs the tightest synced stretch, cuts it to the beat, captions, schedules. They're onto the next room before it posts. The reframe for anyone doing hard work: the part of your job that's physically brutal — the part you assume nobody wants to see — is exactly what people respect watching. Struggle that looks effortless is magnetic. Doing it in sync with someone else doubles it. Do you work with someone you're so in sync with you barely need words? Drop it below — I'm breaking the best ones down next.

Two girls, arms overhead all day, plastering a ceiling in perfect sync and it makes them around $12,000 a month between them, mostly from filming it. Anyone who's done overhead work knows it's the worst position in the trade — arms up, neck back, shoulders burning inside ten minutes. Most people tap out. These two do it for hours, side by side, matching each other's pace like they share a brain. That's the thing you can't look away from: not just that it's two women on a ceiling, but that they're in rhythm doing the part everyone else dreads. Here's why the pair matters more than people think. A solo worker is a clip you watch once. Two people moving in sync — no talking, just anticipating each other — is a relationship, and relationships are what turn a viewer into a follower. You're not watching a task get done. You're watching a partnership work, and that pulls people back for the next one. The money runs three ways off one phone. Their calendar stays booked because homeowners watch the finish and hire them at full rate, zero ad spend — the video sells the work. Tool and material brands pay $3 - 5k a post to get their gear in genuinely skilled hands. And views, often 5-10 million a clip, stack payouts on a phone one of them wedges on a bucket. Neither of them edits. They film the shift, hand it to AI, it grabs the tightest synced stretch, cuts it to the beat, captions, schedules. They're onto the next room before it posts. The reframe for anyone doing hard work: the part of your job that's physically brutal — the part you assume nobody wants to see — is exactly what people respect watching. Struggle that looks effortless is magnetic. Doing it in sync with someone else doubles it. Do you work with someone you're so in sync with you barely need words? Drop it below — I'm breaking the best ones down next.

Rich

23,632 次观看 • 1 个月前

Elon Musk just described the one thing most founders in Silicon Valley have never actually done. Musk: “If you’re gonna create a company, the first thing you should try to do is create a working prototype.” Not a pitch deck. Not a business plan. Not a slide with a hockey stick growth curve and a TAM number invented over lunch. A working prototype. Musk: “Everything looks great on PowerPoint. You can make anything work on PowerPoint.” That line should follow people home. Because he’s right. Cold fusion works on PowerPoint. Faster-than-light travel works on PowerPoint. Your startup that burns $4 million a quarter with zero product-market fit works on PowerPoint. Slides don’t have physics. Slides don’t have friction. Slides don’t have consequences. That’s why people love them. Musk: “If you have an actual demonstration article, even if it’s in primitive form, that’s much, much more effective for convincing people.” Even if it’s ugly. Even if it crashes every third run and looks like it was assembled in a weekend. A crude prototype that limps through a demo will always destroy a beautiful deck that builds nothing. Always. Because a prototype can’t lie to you. A slide can promise the future. A prototype has to survive the present. The world is full of people who pitch. Nearly empty of people who build. School trained you to present. Corporate trained you to present. Venture capital trained you to present. The entire professional world is built to produce people who are brilliant in a conference room and useless in a garage. Musk builds rockets. Then talks about them. Everyone else talks about rockets. Then asks for funding to explore whether building one is even feasible. The distance between those two approaches is the distance between the people who actually reshape the world and the people who give TED talks about reshaping it. You’ve been trained your entire life to polish the pitch instead of build the thing. And you might not even know it. The most honest act left in business is to build something real, set it on a table, and let it speak for itself. No deck. No narrative. No spin. Just the work. PowerPoint is where ideas perform. The prototype is where they’re forced to be real. Most people spend entire careers in a world where the performance is enough. Until someone walks in with the thing that actually works. And every slide in the room goes quiet.

Elon Musk just described the one thing most founders in Silicon Valley have never actually done. Musk: “If you’re gonna create a company, the first thing you should try to do is create a working prototype.” Not a pitch deck. Not a business plan. Not a slide with a hockey stick growth curve and a TAM number invented over lunch. A working prototype. Musk: “Everything looks great on PowerPoint. You can make anything work on PowerPoint.” That line should follow people home. Because he’s right. Cold fusion works on PowerPoint. Faster-than-light travel works on PowerPoint. Your startup that burns $4 million a quarter with zero product-market fit works on PowerPoint. Slides don’t have physics. Slides don’t have friction. Slides don’t have consequences. That’s why people love them. Musk: “If you have an actual demonstration article, even if it’s in primitive form, that’s much, much more effective for convincing people.” Even if it’s ugly. Even if it crashes every third run and looks like it was assembled in a weekend. A crude prototype that limps through a demo will always destroy a beautiful deck that builds nothing. Always. Because a prototype can’t lie to you. A slide can promise the future. A prototype has to survive the present. The world is full of people who pitch. Nearly empty of people who build. School trained you to present. Corporate trained you to present. Venture capital trained you to present. The entire professional world is built to produce people who are brilliant in a conference room and useless in a garage. Musk builds rockets. Then talks about them. Everyone else talks about rockets. Then asks for funding to explore whether building one is even feasible. The distance between those two approaches is the distance between the people who actually reshape the world and the people who give TED talks about reshaping it. You’ve been trained your entire life to polish the pitch instead of build the thing. And you might not even know it. The most honest act left in business is to build something real, set it on a table, and let it speak for itself. No deck. No narrative. No spin. Just the work. PowerPoint is where ideas perform. The prototype is where they’re forced to be real. Most people spend entire careers in a world where the performance is enough. Until someone walks in with the thing that actually works. And every slide in the room goes quiet.

Dustin

35,990 次观看 • 4 个月前

🚨BREAKING: Another ICE agent has been caught on video illegally pointing a firearm at a U.S. citizen, in Lemonwood, California. In the video, an unmarked ICE vehicle is stopped in the middle of the road… no vehicles are in front of it, and nothing is preventing them from driving forward. Instead of continuing to drive down the road, the ICE agent is blocking a pickup truck from turning, while pointing a gun, out their window, directly at the driver of that truck. The truck backs up, but the agent still keeps the firearm pointed at the driver. Only AFTER people begin honking their horns does the agent lower their weapon, and drive away. The law states that pointing a firearm at someone is considered a serious threat of deadly force. It is only justified when an officer has an objectively reasonable belief that they are facing an immediate threat of death, or serious bodily harm. It is not legally allowed to be used to control traffic, and it is not legally allowed to be used as intimidation. And that’s exactly why this video should be alarming to you. The agent is not boxed in… nothing is preventing them from driving down the street. Meanwhile, the agent is the one preventing the truck from continuing its turn. And they are doing so while pointing a gun at the driver. So, the question becomes… What immediate threat justified the ICE agent to stop their car, and point a firearm at a U.S. citizen? Because we are seeing a growing pattern, of publicly documented incidents, where ICE agents point firearms at legal observers, journalists, and bystanders during enforcement encounters… when they are not facing an immediate threat of death. That is not how public safety works. Pointing a firearm at someone is one of the most serious things an officer can do, because it instantly escalates an encounter into a potential deadly force situation. And that is exactly why the law is supposed to restrict it. Every unnecessary drawn gun increases the risk of a wrong judgment, and a fatal mistake. And when there is no accountability, for when that line gets crossed, drawing a gun because the normal for every situation. And when it becomes normal, more people’s lives are put in danger.

🚨BREAKING: Another ICE agent has been caught on video illegally pointing a firearm at a U.S. citizen, in Lemonwood, California. In the video, an unmarked ICE vehicle is stopped in the middle of the road… no vehicles are in front of it, and nothing is preventing them from driving forward. Instead of continuing to drive down the road, the ICE agent is blocking a pickup truck from turning, while pointing a gun, out their window, directly at the driver of that truck. The truck backs up, but the agent still keeps the firearm pointed at the driver. Only AFTER people begin honking their horns does the agent lower their weapon, and drive away. The law states that pointing a firearm at someone is considered a serious threat of deadly force. It is only justified when an officer has an objectively reasonable belief that they are facing an immediate threat of death, or serious bodily harm. It is not legally allowed to be used to control traffic, and it is not legally allowed to be used as intimidation. And that’s exactly why this video should be alarming to you. The agent is not boxed in… nothing is preventing them from driving down the street. Meanwhile, the agent is the one preventing the truck from continuing its turn. And they are doing so while pointing a gun at the driver. So, the question becomes… What immediate threat justified the ICE agent to stop their car, and point a firearm at a U.S. citizen? Because we are seeing a growing pattern, of publicly documented incidents, where ICE agents point firearms at legal observers, journalists, and bystanders during enforcement encounters… when they are not facing an immediate threat of death. That is not how public safety works. Pointing a firearm at someone is one of the most serious things an officer can do, because it instantly escalates an encounter into a potential deadly force situation. And that is exactly why the law is supposed to restrict it. Every unnecessary drawn gun increases the risk of a wrong judgment, and a fatal mistake. And when there is no accountability, for when that line gets crossed, drawing a gun because the normal for every situation. And when it becomes normal, more people’s lives are put in danger.

Jesus Freakin Congress

232,190 次观看 • 3 个月前

“You simp over Rahul Gandhi.” Yeah. Because this country spent over a decade and an unimaginable amount of money manufacturing a caricature called ‘Pappu.’ Not by debating his politics. Not by engaging with his arguments. But by reducing an entire human being to a punchline until people stopped questioning where that image came from. And it worked. Millions of Indians genuinely came to believe that a man with an academic background, years of public life, and documented policy positions was simply an idiot- because that’s what relentless political branding does. So yes, if women are now openly saying, “Actually, I like this man. I like the way he speaks. I like the way he listens. I like the respect with which he treats women. I like the emotional maturity he brings to politics,” then so be it. In a country where politics has been built around hypermasculinity, mockery and domination, how a leader makes women feel is not a frivolous question. It’s a political one. Because women know the difference between a man who needs to be feared and a man who makes you feel heard. If that helps undo a decade of manufactured propaganda, I have absolutely no problem with it. And the Pune girlies agree with me💞

“You simp over Rahul Gandhi.” Yeah. Because this country spent over a decade and an unimaginable amount of money manufacturing a caricature called ‘Pappu.’ Not by debating his politics. Not by engaging with his arguments. But by reducing an entire human being to a punchline until people stopped questioning where that image came from. And it worked. Millions of Indians genuinely came to believe that a man with an academic background, years of public life, and documented policy positions was simply an idiot- because that’s what relentless political branding does. So yes, if women are now openly saying, “Actually, I like this man. I like the way he speaks. I like the way he listens. I like the respect with which he treats women. I like the emotional maturity he brings to politics,” then so be it. In a country where politics has been built around hypermasculinity, mockery and domination, how a leader makes women feel is not a frivolous question. It’s a political one. Because women know the difference between a man who needs to be feared and a man who makes you feel heard. If that helps undo a decade of manufactured propaganda, I have absolutely no problem with it. And the Pune girlies agree with me💞

The Protagonist

13,875 次观看 • 1 个月前

Watching this video makes my jaw clench. Not because I see courage. Not because I see progress. It makes my jaw clench because I see a husband standing outside a women’s restroom while his wife is inside, and another person is demanding that he ignore what his own eyes can see. Put Democrat politics aside for a moment and think about the people you love. Imagine your wife is in that restroom. Imagine it’s your daughter, your granddaughter, your mother, or your sister. Most husbands like us, aren’t going to start debating social theories at that moment. Their first instinct is going to be the same instinct men have had for thousands of years: protect the women they love. That isn’t hatred. It isn’t fear. It’s responsibility. What makes this video so powerful is that it exposes a much bigger disagreement taking place across the country. One side believes that biological reality determines who belongs in male and female spaces. The other believes that personal identity should be the deciding factor. Those are fundamentally different starting points, and that’s why these encounters keep happening. The anger you’re seeing isn’t really about a restroom. It’s about whether ordinary people are still allowed to trust their own judgment, speak honestly about what they see, and protect the people they care about without being told they’re the problem. Millions of Americans like me, have reached the point where they are exhausted by being told that common sense is offensive. They are tired of being told that protecting women is somehow controversial. They are tired of being pressured to deny what they believe is objectively true in order to avoid criticism. That’s why videos like this resonate with so many people. They aren’t seeing a debate about a bathroom. They’re seeing a husband doing what husbands have always done: standing watch over the people entrusted to his care. And for many Americans, the line gets drawn right there. Not with my wife. Not with my daughter. Not with my family. #SilentMajoritySpeaks #AStoneGroove

Watching this video makes my jaw clench. Not because I see courage. Not because I see progress. It makes my jaw clench because I see a husband standing outside a women’s restroom while his wife is inside, and another person is demanding that he ignore what his own eyes can see. Put Democrat politics aside for a moment and think about the people you love. Imagine your wife is in that restroom. Imagine it’s your daughter, your granddaughter, your mother, or your sister. Most husbands like us, aren’t going to start debating social theories at that moment. Their first instinct is going to be the same instinct men have had for thousands of years: protect the women they love. That isn’t hatred. It isn’t fear. It’s responsibility. What makes this video so powerful is that it exposes a much bigger disagreement taking place across the country. One side believes that biological reality determines who belongs in male and female spaces. The other believes that personal identity should be the deciding factor. Those are fundamentally different starting points, and that’s why these encounters keep happening. The anger you’re seeing isn’t really about a restroom. It’s about whether ordinary people are still allowed to trust their own judgment, speak honestly about what they see, and protect the people they care about without being told they’re the problem. Millions of Americans like me, have reached the point where they are exhausted by being told that common sense is offensive. They are tired of being told that protecting women is somehow controversial. They are tired of being pressured to deny what they believe is objectively true in order to avoid criticism. That’s why videos like this resonate with so many people. They aren’t seeing a debate about a bathroom. They’re seeing a husband doing what husbands have always done: standing watch over the people entrusted to his care. And for many Americans, the line gets drawn right there. Not with my wife. Not with my daughter. Not with my family. #SilentMajoritySpeaks #AStoneGroove

A Gene Robinson

791,039 次观看 • 3 个月前

The most unsettling thing about training properly is how little it hurts. You do your handful of heavy sets. Each is genuinely hard for the few reps it lasts, and then it is over. You rack the weight, rest a full few minutes, do it again. Forty minutes later you are walking out breathing normally, barely damp, entirely intact. And the brain panics. That was too easy. Where was the suffering. Where was the two-hour grind, the pool of sweat, the crawl to the car, the soreness that used to reassure you the session counted. Surely something this comfortable cannot be working. This is the exact feeling that keeps people trapped in junk volume for years. It is rarely bad information that holds them there. It is the discomfort of a productive session that stubbornly refuses to feel productive. So they add sets to buy back the suffering, because the suffering felt like proof. The weights are the proof. They went up again this week, quietly, while you were busy missing the pain. The muscle does not grow from how hard the session felt. It has never once asked how you felt about it.

The most unsettling thing about training properly is how little it hurts. You do your handful of heavy sets. Each is genuinely hard for the few reps it lasts, and then it is over. You rack the weight, rest a full few minutes, do it again. Forty minutes later you are walking out breathing normally, barely damp, entirely intact. And the brain panics. That was too easy. Where was the suffering. Where was the two-hour grind, the pool of sweat, the crawl to the car, the soreness that used to reassure you the session counted. Surely something this comfortable cannot be working. This is the exact feeling that keeps people trapped in junk volume for years. It is rarely bad information that holds them there. It is the discomfort of a productive session that stubbornly refuses to feel productive. So they add sets to buy back the suffering, because the suffering felt like proof. The weights are the proof. They went up again this week, quietly, while you were busy missing the pain. The muscle does not grow from how hard the session felt. It has never once asked how you felt about it.

Sama Hoole

43,098 次观看 • 2 个月前