Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Immigration used to be a working-class issue. Workers saw it as competition for jobs, housing, hospital beds, and every other government benefit. Milton Friedman said it plainly: you cannot have open immigration and a welfare state. The welfare state turns into a magnet, pulling more people into a government... system where the pie is fixed. Every new claimant takes from someone who was already there. Either benefits get cut, or taxes go up, and the working class always pays. That’s why the political class now scapegoats the rich. They need the working man angry at billionaires so he doesn’t notice his slice of the welfare pie shrinking or quietly accept higher taxes to fund it all. Keep the resentment pointed upward, and maybe he won’t turn on the politicians actually responsible.show more

Rothmus 🏴

674,065 subscribers

14,038 views • 3 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Milton Friedman put it bluntly: 'You cannot simultaneously have free immigration and a welfare state. He explained why America's early open borders thrived—not from softness, but because immigrants came to work and contribute in a system with almost no welfare safety net pulling them in. Fast-forward to today: You can welcome people for jobs and opportunities... OR maintain a generous welfare state that offers benefits to all comers. But both at once? The incentives break down. Wages for low-skilled workers are pressured, public resources are strained, social trust erodes, and political backlash becomes predictable. This isn't about fear or prejudice, it's pure economics: math, human behavior, and historical reality. Friedman saw it coming. The contradiction hasn't gone away; it's only gotten louder. What do you think—should we prioritize open jobs or a robust welfare system... or is there a realistic way to have both? Drop your take below! 👇

Milton Friedman put it bluntly: 'You cannot simultaneously have free immigration and a welfare state. He explained why America's early open borders thrived—not from softness, but because immigrants came to work and contribute in a system with almost no welfare safety net pulling them in. Fast-forward to today: You can welcome people for jobs and opportunities... OR maintain a generous welfare state that offers benefits to all comers. But both at once? The incentives break down. Wages for low-skilled workers are pressured, public resources are strained, social trust erodes, and political backlash becomes predictable. This isn't about fear or prejudice, it's pure economics: math, human behavior, and historical reality. Friedman saw it coming. The contradiction hasn't gone away; it's only gotten louder. What do you think—should we prioritize open jobs or a robust welfare system... or is there a realistic way to have both? Drop your take below! 👇

𝐃𝐔𝐓𝐂𝐇

69,187 views • 7 months ago

Milton Friedman on the insidious effects of welfare: “The people who get on welfare lose their human independence and feeling of dignity. They become subject to the dictates and whims of their welfare supervisor.” “They’re treated like children, not like responsible adults, and they’re trapped in the system. Maybe a job comes up that looks better than welfare, but they’re afraid to take it because if they lose it after a few months, it may be six months or nine months before they can get back on to welfare. As a result, this becomes a self-perpetuating cycle, rather than simply a temporary state of affairs.”

Milton Friedman on the insidious effects of welfare: “The people who get on welfare lose their human independence and feeling of dignity. They become subject to the dictates and whims of their welfare supervisor.” “They’re treated like children, not like responsible adults, and they’re trapped in the system. Maybe a job comes up that looks better than welfare, but they’re afraid to take it because if they lose it after a few months, it may be six months or nine months before they can get back on to welfare. As a result, this becomes a self-perpetuating cycle, rather than simply a temporary state of affairs.”

Milton Friedman Quotes

72,094 views • 1 month ago

While visiting family I went shopping and couldn’t believe the prices for products that used to be inexpensive. Unless you’re a criminal, an illegal or a bum, you can’t live in California anymore. Democrats have created a system that rewards poverty. Everything is overpriced, because it’s over regulated and over taxed. Now more than half of the state lives on welfare thinking government is the answer, but the truth is government is the problem. Democrats have created a state where the rich subsidize the weak and poor creating a new slave class that continues to vote for them as long as they get their food stamps and free housing. This is why the middle class has fled the state. Real America's Voice (RAV)

While visiting family I went shopping and couldn’t believe the prices for products that used to be inexpensive. Unless you’re a criminal, an illegal or a bum, you can’t live in California anymore. Democrats have created a system that rewards poverty. Everything is overpriced, because it’s over regulated and over taxed. Now more than half of the state lives on welfare thinking government is the answer, but the truth is government is the problem. Democrats have created a state where the rich subsidize the weak and poor creating a new slave class that continues to vote for them as long as they get their food stamps and free housing. This is why the middle class has fled the state. Real America's Voice (RAV)

Ben Bergquam - Real America’s Voice (RAV-TV) News

154,884 views • 1 year ago

Famous economist Milton Friedman on illegal immigration: “The US had free immigration up until 1914, and everybody would’ve said that it was GREAT — now fast forward to today. You cannot have free immigration, while also having a welfare state…” He’s SPOT ON.. 👏👏

Famous economist Milton Friedman on illegal immigration: “The US had free immigration up until 1914, and everybody would’ve said that it was GREAT — now fast forward to today. You cannot have free immigration, while also having a welfare state…” He’s SPOT ON.. 👏👏

American AF 🇺🇸

338,413 views • 9 months ago

The left has made America less safe for the working class by refusing to tackle crime and enforce immigration laws. JD Vance's argument to Rogan, framed as a class issue: the rich have always been able to buy security, and America's promise was democratizing it for everyone else. Vance says the working-class neighborhood his grandparents raised him in saw spikes in violence and carjackings during the Biden administration. "That's not a coincidence." The wealthy never lose public safety — they repurchase it privately. Working people are the ones left holding the experiment.

The left has made America less safe for the working class by refusing to tackle crime and enforce immigration laws. JD Vance's argument to Rogan, framed as a class issue: the rich have always been able to buy security, and America's promise was democratizing it for everyone else. Vance says the working-class neighborhood his grandparents raised him in saw spikes in violence and carjackings during the Biden administration. "That's not a coincidence." The wealthy never lose public safety — they repurchase it privately. Working people are the ones left holding the experiment.

Catch Up

14,274 views • 2 months ago

The countries you hold up as proof socialism works outrank America on business freedom. Every single one of them scores higher than the United States on how easy it is to start, run, and close a company according to the Heritage Foundation’s own index. They have more billionaires per capita and their corporate tax rates sit lower too: Denmark and Norway at 22%, Finland at 20%, Sweden at 21.4% against roughly 25.8% here. Sweden has also run a nationwide school voucher system since 1992 so parents can send their kids to any public or private school they want, for-profit included, and that policy came straight from Milton Friedman. These countries fund large welfare states by taxing the middle class at high rates, and that only stays sustainable because they keep free markets that grow the pie in the first place. So if you want a welfare state that lasts, raise business freedom to Nordic levels, keep corporate taxes competitive, expand school choice, and protect the open markets that actually generate the wealth. Stop doing the exact opposite and expecting similar results.

The countries you hold up as proof socialism works outrank America on business freedom. Every single one of them scores higher than the United States on how easy it is to start, run, and close a company according to the Heritage Foundation’s own index. They have more billionaires per capita and their corporate tax rates sit lower too: Denmark and Norway at 22%, Finland at 20%, Sweden at 21.4% against roughly 25.8% here. Sweden has also run a nationwide school voucher system since 1992 so parents can send their kids to any public or private school they want, for-profit included, and that policy came straight from Milton Friedman. These countries fund large welfare states by taxing the middle class at high rates, and that only stays sustainable because they keep free markets that grow the pie in the first place. So if you want a welfare state that lasts, raise business freedom to Nordic levels, keep corporate taxes competitive, expand school choice, and protect the open markets that actually generate the wealth. Stop doing the exact opposite and expecting similar results.

Rothmus 🏴

54,953 views • 2 months ago

Khanna: That’s my real issue with JD Vance. Why are you hurting the education funding that made both your life and mine possible? We need to fund public schools in this country, especially in working-class neighborhoods. You can’t call yourself the party of the working class and then take away funding from schools that serve working-class kids. You can’t call yourself the party of the working class and then say a working-class kid who wants to go to college shouldn’t be able to get loans or scholarships to do that.

Khanna: That’s my real issue with JD Vance. Why are you hurting the education funding that made both your life and mine possible? We need to fund public schools in this country, especially in working-class neighborhoods. You can’t call yourself the party of the working class and then take away funding from schools that serve working-class kids. You can’t call yourself the party of the working class and then say a working-class kid who wants to go to college shouldn’t be able to get loans or scholarships to do that.

Acyn

89,304 views • 1 year ago

Dismissing AOC for talking about the rich in terms that a majority of Americans agree with is a mistake. The idea that the system is rigged to benefit the rich and that the working class up to the middle-class cannot get ahead is one of the most salient political arguments. Trump used to make it himself! Then gamed the system for himself and his friends - including the fraudsters he’s pardoned - of course.

Dismissing AOC for talking about the rich in terms that a majority of Americans agree with is a mistake. The idea that the system is rigged to benefit the rich and that the working class up to the middle-class cannot get ahead is one of the most salient political arguments. Trump used to make it himself! Then gamed the system for himself and his friends - including the fraudsters he’s pardoned - of course.

Jessica Tarlov

265,647 views • 4 months ago

Do you think tax breaks should go to massive data centers, or to hardworking Georgians? I believe it’s time to cut corporate welfare and let everyday people keep more of what they earn. In the Senate, I’m working to eliminate the state income tax. It can be done. It just takes a true conservative to get it across the finish line.

Do you think tax breaks should go to massive data centers, or to hardworking Georgians? I believe it’s time to cut corporate welfare and let everyday people keep more of what they earn. In the Senate, I’m working to eliminate the state income tax. It can be done. It just takes a true conservative to get it across the finish line.

Blake Tillery

80,603 views • 7 months ago

Does working-class immigration drive down wages for natives? The opposite, says former Reagan official Linda Chavez. It’s not that a native worker is simply replaced and left on welfare or in hardship; more often, it creates new opportunities for that person to move up the economic ladder.

Does working-class immigration drive down wages for natives? The opposite, says former Reagan official Linda Chavez. It’s not that a native worker is simply replaced and left on welfare or in hardship; more often, it creates new opportunities for that person to move up the economic ladder.

Conversations with Coleman

25,939 views • 5 months ago

.Elon Musk The average middle class American can’t get ahead ; every time my hubby and I work harder they move us into a new tax bracket and the government gets our money . “We need to reduce the size of the government and spend less money so that people can keep more of their hard-earned money. "It's a designed "loop trap" – a system that keeps you bleeding and wasting money on things you never agreed to. You work – you have to pay taxes; You buy things - you have to pay taxes; You own property – and pay taxes. It's like – well, that's taxes, taxes, taxes! So where did all this money go? Spend on a bunch of things you don't agree with at all. So, we really need to reduce the size of the government and spend less money so that people can keep more of their hard-earned money. ”

.Elon Musk The average middle class American can’t get ahead ; every time my hubby and I work harder they move us into a new tax bracket and the government gets our money . “We need to reduce the size of the government and spend less money so that people can keep more of their hard-earned money. "It's a designed "loop trap" – a system that keeps you bleeding and wasting money on things you never agreed to. You work – you have to pay taxes; You buy things - you have to pay taxes; You own property – and pay taxes. It's like – well, that's taxes, taxes, taxes! So where did all this money go? Spend on a bunch of things you don't agree with at all. So, we really need to reduce the size of the government and spend less money so that people can keep more of their hard-earned money. ”

🦅 Eagle Wings 🦅

49,265 views • 10 months ago

Late-stage welfare statism is claiming disability for acne and food intolerance. But that’s the incentive of the welfare state and that’s how you end up with some 25% of the population claiming disability. Of course people are going to game the system. It’s free money, and it’s other people’s money. So the government has zero incentive to spend less or spend it wisely. And the parasites have every incentive to grab as much as they can. This is what legal plunder produces. A society that disincentivizes production and incentivizes parasitism. One where claiming disability for fucking acne becomes a rational move.

Late-stage welfare statism is claiming disability for acne and food intolerance. But that’s the incentive of the welfare state and that’s how you end up with some 25% of the population claiming disability. Of course people are going to game the system. It’s free money, and it’s other people’s money. So the government has zero incentive to spend less or spend it wisely. And the parasites have every incentive to grab as much as they can. This is what legal plunder produces. A society that disincentivizes production and incentivizes parasitism. One where claiming disability for fucking acne becomes a rational move.

Rothmus 🏴

23,584 views • 3 months ago

Josh Turek skipped 58% of the votes at the State House this year and had the audacity to say he doesn’t think that his absentee voting record matters to Iowans. It absolutely matters to Iowans, and so do the liberal votes he actually showed up for. Giving taxpayer-funded welfare benefits to illegal immigrants. Allowing kids to secretly change their gender at school. Making it easier for politicians to raise taxes on working families. Restricting Iowa law enforcement from working with ICE to keep dangerous criminals off our streets. That’s Josh Turek’s record, and it’s wrong for Iowa.

Josh Turek skipped 58% of the votes at the State House this year and had the audacity to say he doesn’t think that his absentee voting record matters to Iowans. It absolutely matters to Iowans, and so do the liberal votes he actually showed up for. Giving taxpayer-funded welfare benefits to illegal immigrants. Allowing kids to secretly change their gender at school. Making it easier for politicians to raise taxes on working families. Restricting Iowa law enforcement from working with ICE to keep dangerous criminals off our streets. That’s Josh Turek’s record, and it’s wrong for Iowa.

Ashley Hinson

151,979 views • 26 days ago

.Batya Ungar-Sargon: "[I]t's really important to remember the open border was class warfare against the American working class because all of these 10 million people who streamed across the border ended up either on welfare or working, which meant that they were competing with Americans for jobs and driving down the wages for Americans who work with their hands for a living, right? These people are unbelievably generous to a point? But America's working class realized that their own children were being disinherited so that the elites in this country could hire cheap nannies and cheap landscapers and cheap people to make their salads and clean their homes and to the other things that they considered to be beneath their dignity to do. Now, working class Americans are very, very good-hearted people. When they see the chaos on the streets, they are going to tell pollsters I don't like that. But if you think for a second, that means that they're going to give power back to the Democrats on something like immigration, the Democrats who opened the border and justified the open border for four years and now pretend that never happened in say, of course, we need a closed border, I have another thing coming for you."

.Batya Ungar-Sargon: "[I]t's really important to remember the open border was class warfare against the American working class because all of these 10 million people who streamed across the border ended up either on welfare or working, which meant that they were competing with Americans for jobs and driving down the wages for Americans who work with their hands for a living, right? These people are unbelievably generous to a point? But America's working class realized that their own children were being disinherited so that the elites in this country could hire cheap nannies and cheap landscapers and cheap people to make their salads and clean their homes and to the other things that they considered to be beneath their dignity to do. Now, working class Americans are very, very good-hearted people. When they see the chaos on the streets, they are going to tell pollsters I don't like that. But if you think for a second, that means that they're going to give power back to the Democrats on something like immigration, the Democrats who opened the border and justified the open border for four years and now pretend that never happened in say, of course, we need a closed border, I have another thing coming for you."

Curtis Houck

18,331 views • 8 months ago

Wilmore: This is a type of hypocrisy that I've seen for a while now. There's always been this kind of hyperventilating rightly so over protecting middle class workers.. unless they work for the government, then they don't count. Then they're not real Americans. All of a sudden, their jobs are disposable. You can cut them off immediately. That is a different type of elitism that has now crept into the right where there's elitism against working class people who have civil service jobs. When I was growing up, for black people, people of color, civil service jobs was one of the only ways to get into the middle class.

Wilmore: This is a type of hypocrisy that I've seen for a while now. There's always been this kind of hyperventilating rightly so over protecting middle class workers.. unless they work for the government, then they don't count. Then they're not real Americans. All of a sudden, their jobs are disposable. You can cut them off immediately. That is a different type of elitism that has now crept into the right where there's elitism against working class people who have civil service jobs. When I was growing up, for black people, people of color, civil service jobs was one of the only ways to get into the middle class.

Acyn

689,823 views • 1 year ago

Let me see if I've got the jist of it: 🧐 • The government creates an entire class of people that live off of hard working Americans, which thanks to globalists now includes migrants and illegal aliens. • They punish this class of people if they get married or find legal jobs just to keep them dependent on the government, while concurrently punishing anyone trying to live independently. • Welfare abuse has always been a thing...but strangely our timeline has been conveniently inundated with videos of people bragging about it. • Now because the government is shut down and nobody cares (and you best believe both parties knew this was coming) we've got more videos, this time of people threatening to riot and loot that authorities suspiciously also aren't looking into for some reason. You do realize they're pitting working class people against the societal parasites they've purposely created for generations as a distraction to everything awful the government is doing, the money they're stealing, the children they're trafficking, the wars they're starting, the poisons they're pumping, and the shut down no one gives a sh*t about, right? They want a civil war, so we don't have the revolution we actually need. They want you emotionally riled up, so you continue to feed their life draining negativity system....and more importantly they need you to plead for them to open the government back up so both parties can continue looting the treasury. World Peace is a state of being. It's not something a war-mongering, corporate owned, foreign entity controlled, criminally-run government can...or wants to give you. 🕊️ The easiest way to render their tricks useless....is to not fall for them at all.

Let me see if I've got the jist of it: 🧐 • The government creates an entire class of people that live off of hard working Americans, which thanks to globalists now includes migrants and illegal aliens. • They punish this class of people if they get married or find legal jobs just to keep them dependent on the government, while concurrently punishing anyone trying to live independently. • Welfare abuse has always been a thing...but strangely our timeline has been conveniently inundated with videos of people bragging about it. • Now because the government is shut down and nobody cares (and you best believe both parties knew this was coming) we've got more videos, this time of people threatening to riot and loot that authorities suspiciously also aren't looking into for some reason. You do realize they're pitting working class people against the societal parasites they've purposely created for generations as a distraction to everything awful the government is doing, the money they're stealing, the children they're trafficking, the wars they're starting, the poisons they're pumping, and the shut down no one gives a sh*t about, right? They want a civil war, so we don't have the revolution we actually need. They want you emotionally riled up, so you continue to feed their life draining negativity system....and more importantly they need you to plead for them to open the government back up so both parties can continue looting the treasury. World Peace is a state of being. It's not something a war-mongering, corporate owned, foreign entity controlled, criminally-run government can...or wants to give you. 🕊️ The easiest way to render their tricks useless....is to not fall for them at all.

Mindy MF Robinson 🦄

95,053 views • 11 months ago

Here is a sum the Treasury never asks you to do. This year Britain spends £62.2 billion on defence. Within three years it will be £73.5 billion. At The Hague, every NATO government signed up to five per cent of GDP, demanded from a podium in Washington, agreed without a single parliamentary vote. Trump demanded it, Trump got it... And in the same breath, they tell the sick, the disabled and the young that the welfare state is unaffordable. Now Andy Burnham arrives with his plan. "Fair and lasting" welfare reform. An ally says he is "more welfare than warfare." Fine words. But Westminster has a long history of dressing up cuts as compassion. Support becomes conditionality. Help becomes surveillance. Reform becomes punishment. And the warning lights are already blinking. His own chief of staff has pushed for stripping bus passes and TV licences from pensioners. Taking PIP from the under-30s is called a "difficult sell." Not an outrage. A sell. Meanwhile the MOD sits on a £42.5 billion black hole and nobody sends an assessor round. Austerity, it turns out, is means-tested. It applies only to the poor. Welfare or warfare is not a slogan. It is an invoice, and somebody always pays it. For seventy years it has been us. So tell us. Do you trust #AndyBurnham's #welfare reform, or have we heard it all before?

Here is a sum the Treasury never asks you to do. This year Britain spends £62.2 billion on defence. Within three years it will be £73.5 billion. At The Hague, every NATO government signed up to five per cent of GDP, demanded from a podium in Washington, agreed without a single parliamentary vote. Trump demanded it, Trump got it... And in the same breath, they tell the sick, the disabled and the young that the welfare state is unaffordable. Now Andy Burnham arrives with his plan. "Fair and lasting" welfare reform. An ally says he is "more welfare than warfare." Fine words. But Westminster has a long history of dressing up cuts as compassion. Support becomes conditionality. Help becomes surveillance. Reform becomes punishment. And the warning lights are already blinking. His own chief of staff has pushed for stripping bus passes and TV licences from pensioners. Taking PIP from the under-30s is called a "difficult sell." Not an outrage. A sell. Meanwhile the MOD sits on a £42.5 billion black hole and nobody sends an assessor round. Austerity, it turns out, is means-tested. It applies only to the poor. Welfare or warfare is not a slogan. It is an invoice, and somebody always pays it. For seventy years it has been us. So tell us. Do you trust #AndyBurnham's #welfare reform, or have we heard it all before?

The Heartlands Tribune

13,336 views • 2 months ago

Incentives explain outcomes. Milton Friedman observed that you cannot simultaneously have free immigration and a welfare state. America’s earlier waves of immigration succeeded so well because, prior to 1914, the country maintained open borders without a welfare system. Immigrants arrived to work, support themselves and their families, and build new lives. Those who couldn’t succeed typically returned home. This environment naturally selected for self-reliant individuals and fueled tremendous economic growth. In contrast, today’s expansive welfare state, offering healthcare, education, housing assistance, and cash transfers, fundamentally alters the incentives. When immigrants, whether legal or illegal, can immediately access these benefits, it becomes possible for some to arrive and function as net fiscal drains rather than contributors. Friedman therefore opposed the unsustainable pairing of open borders with generous entitlements. So it’s not paradoxical why one would support pre-1914 immigration but oppose its later version. They are very different phenomena. Either can work on its own, but together they generate higher taxes, social friction, and long-term strain.

Incentives explain outcomes. Milton Friedman observed that you cannot simultaneously have free immigration and a welfare state. America’s earlier waves of immigration succeeded so well because, prior to 1914, the country maintained open borders without a welfare system. Immigrants arrived to work, support themselves and their families, and build new lives. Those who couldn’t succeed typically returned home. This environment naturally selected for self-reliant individuals and fueled tremendous economic growth. In contrast, today’s expansive welfare state, offering healthcare, education, housing assistance, and cash transfers, fundamentally alters the incentives. When immigrants, whether legal or illegal, can immediately access these benefits, it becomes possible for some to arrive and function as net fiscal drains rather than contributors. Friedman therefore opposed the unsustainable pairing of open borders with generous entitlements. So it’s not paradoxical why one would support pre-1914 immigration but oppose its later version. They are very different phenomena. Either can work on its own, but together they generate higher taxes, social friction, and long-term strain.

Rothmus 🏴

28,630 views • 4 months ago