Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

In 1985, Soviet circus performer Valentin Dikul demonstrated his strength by power juggling sphere balls, each weighing 40 kg (88 lbs)

386,839 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

8 Kommentare

Profilbild von Mark Stevenson (World History)
Mark Stevenson (World History)vor 1 Jahr

The same man, but in modern times. He's now 76 years old

Profilbild von Facts by Vishal
Facts by Vishalvor 1 Jahr

He overcame a severe back injury from a fall at 17 years old through rigorous self-rehabilitation using kettlebells.

Profilbild von Trevor Allen 🩺 🥼
Trevor Allen 🩺 🥼vor 1 Jahr

Is that alternative universe Jack Black

Profilbild von Jeremy
Jeremyvor 1 Jahr

I can do that but I don't Wana.

Profilbild von Hyderabadi $@!
Hyderabadi $@!vor 1 Jahr

Oh god nice skills

Profilbild von Growth Guru
Growth Guruvor 1 Jahr

This is really interesting as Fuck. How did he manage that

Profilbild von Sworvx
Sworvxvor 1 Jahr

What a superhero 🤣🤮

Profilbild von Inspire Adventure
Inspire Adventurevor 1 Jahr

What a beast.

Ähnliche Videos

Tom Haviland is stronger overall, especially in strongman-style lifts, due to superior lower body power, leverage, and event-specific training. Andrey Smaev (aka Andre Samev, "Russian Hulk"): ~6'1"-6'2", 330-340 lbs at ~27 years old. Insane upper-body density with 26" arms and massive forearms. Mind-blowing feats include ~660-700+ lb bench (raw/paused, including 200 kg for 25 reps), heavy weighted pull-ups/muscle-ups, and monster rows/curls. He crushes pressing and pulling volume but rarely trains heavy squats or deads as an adult (solid teen PRs only). Tom Haviland: 6'8", 330-350+ lbs at ~38. Australian farm strongman built like a giant. Verified monster lifts: 1003 lb deadlift (deficit/straps), 811 lb squat x3, 600 lb bench, 750 lb Zercher, 1200 lb yoke walks, and brutal carries. Trains with minimalist, brutal basics (Zercher squats, yoke, shrugs) outdoors on the farm. Exceptional strength for his extreme height and long levers. Why Haviland wins: Strongman metrics (deadlift, squat, yoke, carries) heavily favor him—he consistently moves more total tonnage in full-body events. Smaev’s shorter range of motion and upper-body bias let him dominate bench and rows, but he lacks recent heavy lower-body proof. At similar bodyweights, Tom’s height + verified pulls give him the clear edge in broad "who’s stronger" terms. Smaev might still take raw bench or pure arm strength. Both are genetic freaks on gear who shouldn’t exist in our era—Smaev’s cartoonish density vs Haviland’s towering power. Haviland takes it for raw functional strength.

🚫👁️Drinks on Saturday🇺🇸

244,337 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

85-87 T88 MPH (HS Junior) ➡️ 92-94 T95.5 MPH (HS Senior) 🤯⁠ ⁠ An athlete update from Performance Coach Paul Hall Jr. 🔥⁠ ⁠ Tread Athlete Ryan Press came to us a little under a year and a half ago sitting 85-87 mph, topping 88, and weighing in at 155 lbs. Fast forward to now, and he's sitting 92-94, topping 95.5mph.⁠ ⁠ Overall, Ryan's foundation was there. However, the goal was to improve his total development in terms of strength, nutrition, and mechanics.⁠ ⁠ Weight Room 🏋️⁠ ’22-23 ➡️ ‘24⁠ DB Bench: 55lb ➡️ 80lb⁠ Back Squat: 250lb ➡️ 300lb ⁠ Deadlift:310lb ➡️ 370lb⁠ DB Row: 70 ➡️ 90 ⁠ ⁠ Body Weight (+20lbs): ⁠ ’22-23: 155 lbs⁠ ’24: 175 lbs ⁠ ⁠ Mechanics⁠ ⁠ Ryan had an aggressive coil coming into peak leg lift, which was causing some downstream issues with his ability to rotationally load his back leg and maintain direction. This coil was also presenting as excessive torso counter rotation at foot strike, forcing an aggressive pull towards his glove side and negatively impacting both velocity and command at times.⁠ ⁠ The change was utilizing a more controlled lift, thinking "knee to glove-side pec." Through a variety of med ball work and plyo drills, the goal was to help him rotate downhill in a more north-to-south vs east-to-west plane of rotation. This helped improve command, led to harder secondary pitches, and increased the output substantially on the heater. ⁠ ⁠ Ryan, now a Senior in HS, ranks as one of the top prep arms in Canada. ⁠ ⁠ Well worthy of a look for the upcoming Draft. 🚀⁠ ⁠ #TreadFam⁠

Tread Athletics

70,393 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

After a year of intensive research, Dr. William Makis presents the most crucial graph of his career: the ivermectin dosing schedule for cancer. Dr. Makis recommends a starting dose of 1mg per kg of body weight per day for most cancers, including breast, colon, lung, pancreatic, renal, gastric, and leukemias. For a 60kg individual, this translates to 60mg daily, which can be taken as: - Five 12mg pills - Or 6ml of liquid (approximately one teaspoon plus 1ml) The evidence supporting the efficacy of ivermectin is compelling and dose-dependent. - Dr. Shankara Chetty observed a significant drop in a prostate cancer patient’s PSA from 89 to 11 after taking 45mg/day. - Dr. Tess Lawry’s case study showed a remarkable decrease in CA125 (an ovarian cancer marker) from 288 to 22 after just 0.2mg/kg. - A long-term Castro study on children with leukemia demonstrated no side effects after 6 months at a dose of 1mg/kg. For aggressive cancers like pancreatic and brain cancers, a higher dose may be necessary due to the blood-brain barrier. Dr. Makis cites examples: - Dr. Landrito’s colleague with terminal gallbladder cancer experienced the disappearance of cancer after 14 months at a dose of 2mg/kg/day. - The highest documented dose is 2.5mg/kg, as reported by Dr. Chetty, with only transient visual side effects that resolved. Mainstream oncology is unlikely to offer this treatment due to ivermectin’s generic, off-patent status and unprofitable nature. Consequently, there are no funded clinical trials. Dr. Makis concludes that using ivermectin in cancer treatment is straightforward and highly safe. He strongly suggests that those struggling with cancer should start with a dose of 1mg/kg/day. This can be taken for several months, even over a year, with an excellent safety profile based on long-term anecdotal evidence. The power to fight cancer may already be within your reach.

Commentary | Global Ivermectin Research Hub

102,123 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

ON THIS DAY in 1956, Yuri Vardanyan, the Armenian Weightlifting Legend Who Set 43 World Records & Broke 5 in a Single Olympic Day, Was Born. 🇦🇲 70 years ago today, on June 13, 1956, one of the greatest weightlifters in history was born in Leninakan, the city now known as Gyumri. Yuri Vardanyan would go on to become an Olympic Champion, a seven-time World Champion, and the Armenian titan who set 43 world records and stood atop the world of weightlifting through the late 1970s and early 1980s. Vardanyan began training in 1970 at the age of 14 under his uncle Sergey Vardanyan at the legendary Lokomotiv club, in a city already famous for producing some of the strongest men in the world. By 20, he had broken every world record in his division. By 21, he was a World Champion. By 24, he was an Olympic gold medalist. Moscow, 1980: Five World Records In A Single Day When Vardanyan stepped onto the platform at the 1980 Moscow Summer Olympics, no one in the arena could have predicted what they were about to witness. Over the course of a single afternoon in the light heavyweight 82.5 kg category, he rewrote the record books five times. He broke through the 400-kilogram barrier in his class, a number long thought beyond human reach, and walked away with the gold medal around his neck. With it, he became the first Armenian ever to stand atop an Olympic weightlifting podium. Across a career that lasted barely a decade, he amassed 43 world records, claimed seven World Championship golds including five consecutive years from 1977 to 1981, won five European titles, and stood as the undisputed king of his division through the late 1970s and early 1980s. The Soviet Union named him Honoured Master of Sports in 1977 and awarded him the Order of Lenin in 1985. In 1994, the International Weightlifting Federation inducted him into its Hall of Fame. The Olympic Crown He Was Denied The full measure of Vardanyan's career carries a quiet tragedy: by the 1984 Los Angeles Olympics he was at his peak and the heavy favorite for a second gold, but the Soviet boycott denied him the stage. He competed at the Friendship Games instead, dominated, and retired the following year at 29. After his career, Vardanyan returned to public life in Armenia, serving as adviser to President Sargsyan, Minister of Sports in 2013, and later Armenia's Ambassador to Georgia. He passed away on November 1, 2018, at the age of 62 in the United States. The Pride Of Gyumri Yuri Vardanyan was a son of Gyumri, the city devastated by the 1988 Spitak earthquake and rebuilt in the decades that followed. Gyumri's weightlifters have long been a source of national pride, and Vardanyan stands at the front of that tradition, the man who lifted Armenian sport onto the world's highest podium and held it there. 70 years after his birth, his records remain landmarks, his Olympic gold a touchstone, and his name one of the most beloved in the history of Armenian sport. #YuriVardanyan #ArmenianOlympian #ArmenianWeightlifting #Gyumri #ArmenianSports

Zartonk Media

14,172 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

This is the most powerful commercial jet engine currently flying on an operational airliner. The GE90-115B was built by GE Aerospace specifically for the Boeing 777-300ER. It weighs around 8.3 tonnes, has a 3.25 metre wide fan and produces up to 512 kN (115,000 lbf) of thrust from a single engine. To understand the sheer scale of that output, it produces roughly 2.7 times the thrust of the F135 jet engine powering the F-35, the most powerful fighter engine currently in service. The enormous fan at the front uses just 22 carbon fibre composite blades with titanium leading edges. At maximum thrust, it pulls in roughly 1.4 tonnes of air every second, with nearly 90% bypassing the core rather than passing through the combustor. At around 150 knots during takeoff, its 512 kn of thrust corresponds to roughly 39.5 MW of propulsive power, or in automotive terms around 53,000 hp from one engine. And it burns roughly 4-5 kg of jet fuel every second at maximum power conditions. Two of these engines are enough to power a fully loaded 777-300ER weighing more than 350 tonnes. Even if one engine fails after the critical point during takeoff, the aircraft is certified to continue the takeoff and climb on the remaining one GE90 engine. Each engine costs around $35-40 million. More than 2,500, GE90s engines have been built, and the GE90 family has accumulated nearly 130 million flight hours. And this is precisely why companies like GE Aerospace remain so difficult to displace in jet engines. There is never one breakthrough. GE spent roughly $2+ billion developing the GE90, chasing small gains across hundreds of systems, efficiency, materials, reliability and component life.

Ammanichanda

51,033 Aufrufe • vor 2 Tagen

Garry Kasparov unleashes the truth: putin’s war is pure survival, not strategy. Garry Kasparov nails it: putin isn't some rational leader. He's a dictator obsessed with staying in power for 25 years and counting. This war? It's his life support, infecting every part of Russia. Forget ideology, he is a one-man mafia boss, desperate to project strength. He won't stop until he declares 'victory,' which he can't get, so he'll just keep expanding the war. He literally couldn't care less about how many Russians die as long as he controls Moscow and St. Petersburg. Trump even offered him an 'out' twice, and putin rejected it because it would make him look weak - and weakness means the whole flock turns on him. He's even eyeing a test of NATO's Article 5 and hoping his far-right buddies take over Europe. The West's slow reaction and constant reliance on America has just emboldened him. Kasparov is right, the only thing that changes Russia is a Ukrainian victory, and fast. Garry Kasparov: I hate starting to talk with criticism but this time I have to point out that your question basically repeated the same mistake in evaluation because you tried to analyze putin’s actions from the position of the responsible national leader. Everything you said is absolutely correct. vladimir's putin’s rule is devastating for Russia and I believe it will end to the collapse of the Russian Empire which is long overdue. But vladimir putin’s calculations are not based on this rational thinking. His view is very different. He is in power for 25 years and counting. That’s all that matters for him. He’s a dictator and he works for one thing: only survival. He’s still there. And the war has become the only way to keep him in power. War now is in every layer of Russian society, from the very top of the government to industries all the way down to kindergartens. It’s infected by the war virus and that's how putin stays in power. Interviewer: So that makes him different from let's say Soviet leaders or or even some of the tsar’s right? Again you should look at Soviet leaders based on the political momentum, just obviously Soviet leaders that we remember, you and me, so like Brezhnev, they had different calculations. But also don't forget the Soviet leaders after Stalin. They were ruling the country that had strong ideology and communist party. I'm not here to advocate for the communist party or for any kind of ideology but there's a fundamental difference between the party rule which is a mafia structure and the one man dictatorship. putin shifted Russia to a one man dictatorship where everything depends on an individual who is on the top of power, who becomes at certain time a spine of the whole system. And this system depends on his survival, demonstrating his strengths is to be a macho, to be an alpha, surrounded by other mafia bosses. And that's why, you know, his current position today is, you may call it desperate, but I don't think he he sees it the same way. He will continue the war as long as he has the resources. And this is something that the free world is just getting to understand. That was my main criticism to the west. vladimir putin, for a long time was at open war, those were hybrid at the time with the free world. And the free world, and especially Europe, was not willing to hear the messages, to see the messages and to respond accordingly. 1/2

Yasmina

301,112 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten