Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

In 2006, Al Gore released An Inconvenient Truth, a film that defined modern climate alarm. In it, he warned Greenland and Antarctica's ice would melt, driving seas high enough to put major cities underwater, with entire coastlines redrawn. Eighteen years later though, none of it has happened. Not even... show more

Electroverse

44,131 subscribers

220,732 views • 4 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

In 2006, Al Gore’s “An Inconvenient Truth” was peak climate fearmongering. He showed maps of cities underwater, claiming melting ice from Greenland and Antarctica would displace hundreds of millions. He said our maps "would have to be redrawn." 18 years later, none of it has happened. Not even close. The apocalypse was always a decade away. Meanwhile, the man selling the panic got rich. Very rich. While you were told to feel guilty and lower your standard of living, Al Gore built a $300+ million personal fortune from the climate industrial complex. He became the first "climate billionaire." He made his money from: Green investment funds (Generation Investment Management) Board seats & advisory roles Massive speaking fees ($200k+ per speech) Carbon credit trading He didn't save the planet. He monetized your anxiety. The truth is, the predictions were always more profitable than they were accurate.

In 2006, Al Gore’s “An Inconvenient Truth” was peak climate fearmongering. He showed maps of cities underwater, claiming melting ice from Greenland and Antarctica would displace hundreds of millions. He said our maps "would have to be redrawn." 18 years later, none of it has happened. Not even close. The apocalypse was always a decade away. Meanwhile, the man selling the panic got rich. Very rich. While you were told to feel guilty and lower your standard of living, Al Gore built a $300+ million personal fortune from the climate industrial complex. He became the first "climate billionaire." He made his money from: Green investment funds (Generation Investment Management) Board seats & advisory roles Massive speaking fees ($200k+ per speech) Carbon credit trading He didn't save the planet. He monetized your anxiety. The truth is, the predictions were always more profitable than they were accurate.

Camus

358,785 views • 10 months ago

Al Gore said we had 10 years to save the planet… 19 years ago. Let’s check the scoreboard on his apocalyptic 2006 predictions. 1/ In 2006, Al Gore stood on his iconic ladder and gave a masterclass in climate fearmongering. He claimed Greenland & Antarctica were disintegrating, that "maps of the world will have to be redrawn," and showed graphics of major cities flooding. The media treated it as gospel. 2/ So, what’s happened since his dire warning? Greenland Ice Mass: - Gore’s claim: Imminent breakup and melt, causing catastrophic sea level rise. - The Reality: While Greenland has lost ice, it's a far cry from "maps being redrawn." - From 1992-2023, Greenland contributed ~13.7 mm to sea level rise. That's about half an inch over 31 years. 3/ Sea Level Rise: - Gore’s implication: Feet of sea level rise, drowning Florida, Shanghai, and the Netherlands. - The Reality: The global average sea level has risen at a steady, linear rate of about 3.4 mm per year for decades. No alarming acceleration. Since 2006, it's risen about 2.3 inches total. 4/ Let's be clear: A 2-3 inch rise over 18 years is a concern for long-term planning, but it is not the "redraw the world maps" catastrophe Gore sold to the public. His graphics were science-fiction, not science. 5/ The real tragedy of Gore’s doom-peddling? It created a generation of climate policy based on panic, not pragmatism. It shut down scientific debate and funneled trillions into inefficient solutions based on failed models. When the predictions fail so spectacularly, you have to question the motive. 6/ The climate is complex, and our understanding evolves. But the "settled science" of 2006, used to justify a radical restructuring of the global economy, was wildly, demonstrably wrong. It’s not denial to point out when a prophecy fails. It’s accountability. What's your take?

Al Gore said we had 10 years to save the planet… 19 years ago. Let’s check the scoreboard on his apocalyptic 2006 predictions. 1/ In 2006, Al Gore stood on his iconic ladder and gave a masterclass in climate fearmongering. He claimed Greenland & Antarctica were disintegrating, that "maps of the world will have to be redrawn," and showed graphics of major cities flooding. The media treated it as gospel. 2/ So, what’s happened since his dire warning? Greenland Ice Mass: - Gore’s claim: Imminent breakup and melt, causing catastrophic sea level rise. - The Reality: While Greenland has lost ice, it's a far cry from "maps being redrawn." - From 1992-2023, Greenland contributed ~13.7 mm to sea level rise. That's about half an inch over 31 years. 3/ Sea Level Rise: - Gore’s implication: Feet of sea level rise, drowning Florida, Shanghai, and the Netherlands. - The Reality: The global average sea level has risen at a steady, linear rate of about 3.4 mm per year for decades. No alarming acceleration. Since 2006, it's risen about 2.3 inches total. 4/ Let's be clear: A 2-3 inch rise over 18 years is a concern for long-term planning, but it is not the "redraw the world maps" catastrophe Gore sold to the public. His graphics were science-fiction, not science. 5/ The real tragedy of Gore’s doom-peddling? It created a generation of climate policy based on panic, not pragmatism. It shut down scientific debate and funneled trillions into inefficient solutions based on failed models. When the predictions fail so spectacularly, you have to question the motive. 6/ The climate is complex, and our understanding evolves. But the "settled science" of 2006, used to justify a radical restructuring of the global economy, was wildly, demonstrably wrong. It’s not denial to point out when a prophecy fails. It’s accountability. What's your take?

Camus

26,216 views • 8 months ago

Al Gore says the doomsday predictions from climate scientists 20 years ago "were proven dead right," so we should take them even more seriously now. He says it's "inevitable that we're going to see Greenland go and the west Antarctic ice sheet go." Reminder, in 2006, Gore warned that the world would reach a "point of no return" in 10 years. He also said there would be "no more snows of Kilimanjaro" within a decade, which proved false. He also predicted in 2009 that there was a 75% chance of the North Pole losing all of its ice during parts of the summer by the year 2016. That didn't happen, either.

Al Gore says the doomsday predictions from climate scientists 20 years ago "were proven dead right," so we should take them even more seriously now. He says it's "inevitable that we're going to see Greenland go and the west Antarctic ice sheet go." Reminder, in 2006, Gore warned that the world would reach a "point of no return" in 10 years. He also said there would be "no more snows of Kilimanjaro" within a decade, which proved false. He also predicted in 2009 that there was a 75% chance of the North Pole losing all of its ice during parts of the summer by the year 2016. That didn't happen, either.

Breitbart News

423,103 views • 4 months ago

🚨Tiresome climate scold Al Gore exposes himself yet again in the video here. In the clip, Gore claims the “doomsday predictions from climate scientists 20 years ago were proven dead right” - so we should trust them EVEN MORE now. He doubles down: “It is inevitable that we’re going to see Greenland go and the west Antarctic ice sheet go.” But none of that is true. In fact, Gore has been wrong about literally everything for two solid decades. Here’s the inconvenient truth about Gore’s always wrong predictions: • 2006 (An Inconvenient Truth era): “We have reached the point of no return” within 10 years (i.e. by 2016) unless we take “drastic measures.” But 2016 came and went. No point of no return. Business as usual. • 2006: “Within the decade there will be no more snows of Kilimanjaro.” But 2016 arrived. Lots of snow is still on the mountain. It remains there today. • 2009 (Copenhagen speech): “75% chance” the entire North Polar ice cap would be gone during summer months within 5–7 years (by 2014–2016). But those months came and went and Arctic ice is still there every summer. So, given that inconvenient reality, Gore did what climate scolds to best - he kept moving the goalposts: • 2008: Ice-free Arctic by 2013. • 2009: Pushed it to 2014. • Repeated variations for years - the shipping industry is still waiting for the ice-free passage. Meanwhile the U.S. enjoyed the longest stretch without major hurricane landfalls in recorded history right after Gore’s “super-hurricanes” panic. Gore’s batting average on doomsday: 0-for-everything. Yet here he is in 2026 demanding we treat his failed prophecies as gospel. Share if you’re as weary as I am of the incessant grift. #ClimateScam #AlGore #InconvenientBS

🚨Tiresome climate scold Al Gore exposes himself yet again in the video here. In the clip, Gore claims the “doomsday predictions from climate scientists 20 years ago were proven dead right” - so we should trust them EVEN MORE now. He doubles down: “It is inevitable that we’re going to see Greenland go and the west Antarctic ice sheet go.” But none of that is true. In fact, Gore has been wrong about literally everything for two solid decades. Here’s the inconvenient truth about Gore’s always wrong predictions: • 2006 (An Inconvenient Truth era): “We have reached the point of no return” within 10 years (i.e. by 2016) unless we take “drastic measures.” But 2016 came and went. No point of no return. Business as usual. • 2006: “Within the decade there will be no more snows of Kilimanjaro.” But 2016 arrived. Lots of snow is still on the mountain. It remains there today. • 2009 (Copenhagen speech): “75% chance” the entire North Polar ice cap would be gone during summer months within 5–7 years (by 2014–2016). But those months came and went and Arctic ice is still there every summer. So, given that inconvenient reality, Gore did what climate scolds to best - he kept moving the goalposts: • 2008: Ice-free Arctic by 2013. • 2009: Pushed it to 2014. • Repeated variations for years - the shipping industry is still waiting for the ice-free passage. Meanwhile the U.S. enjoyed the longest stretch without major hurricane landfalls in recorded history right after Gore’s “super-hurricanes” panic. Gore’s batting average on doomsday: 0-for-everything. Yet here he is in 2026 demanding we treat his failed prophecies as gospel. Share if you’re as weary as I am of the incessant grift. #ClimateScam #AlGore #InconvenientBS

⚡️David Blackmon⚡️

18,367 views • 4 months ago

In 2006, Al Gore warned of a "tipping point" where climate doom was inescapable in 10 years. 20 years later, with multiple failed predictions he's still warning of climate doom -- just pushing the clock further back so he, now at age 78, won't be around to answer when they again fail to come true. At a "Sustainability in Entertainment Honors" event in Hollywood, Gore cites the plot of The Day After Tomorrow -- where the Gulf Stream fails and the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) ceases -- and warns "this is a very real threat within the next 25 years." The West Wing actor Bradley Whitford tries to shorten the timeline, suggesting that "we're in an ice age in, like, 10 years," but Gore quickly shuts him down: "No, no, no. It would take longer." "But there are other tipping points, as well, that are as immediate as that," he continues, sharing a W.H.O. prediction of 1 billion "climate migrants" in 24 years. And, rather than worrying about what those migrants might do to the host communities they enter, Gore frets about the "heightened risk of xenophobia" that comes from "too much too quickly." "If a few million migrants from the Eastern Mediterranean into Hungary and central Europe caused Orbán and contributed to Trump... can we even imagine what 1 billion climate migrants might cause? We could see dire threats to our capacity for self-governance in the chaos."

In 2006, Al Gore warned of a "tipping point" where climate doom was inescapable in 10 years. 20 years later, with multiple failed predictions he's still warning of climate doom -- just pushing the clock further back so he, now at age 78, won't be around to answer when they again fail to come true. At a "Sustainability in Entertainment Honors" event in Hollywood, Gore cites the plot of The Day After Tomorrow -- where the Gulf Stream fails and the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) ceases -- and warns "this is a very real threat within the next 25 years." The West Wing actor Bradley Whitford tries to shorten the timeline, suggesting that "we're in an ice age in, like, 10 years," but Gore quickly shuts him down: "No, no, no. It would take longer." "But there are other tipping points, as well, that are as immediate as that," he continues, sharing a W.H.O. prediction of 1 billion "climate migrants" in 24 years. And, rather than worrying about what those migrants might do to the host communities they enter, Gore frets about the "heightened risk of xenophobia" that comes from "too much too quickly." "If a few million migrants from the Eastern Mediterranean into Hungary and central Europe caused Orbán and contributed to Trump... can we even imagine what 1 billion climate migrants might cause? We could see dire threats to our capacity for self-governance in the chaos."

Breitbart News

153,252 views • 3 months ago

I told Senator Sheldon WhiteClub today that I won’t be listening to or caring about any of his lessons on morality knowing that he joined an all-white Rhode Island Country Club. I’m also done with the likes of AOC, Al Gore, John Kerry, and the rest of the lying cabal that make stupid climate predictions, plunder tens of billions of tax dollars, enrich their well-connected allies, and are committed to strangulating out of existence entire sectors of our economy. Climate alarmist AOC wants to be taken seriously while also insisting the world is imminently about to end due to climate change (Just under 5 years remain on her nutty Jan 2019 prediction that only 12 years of life are left on Earth). Al Gore is now speaking publicly about his concern with global freezing after decades of grift talking about global warming. “Within the decade there will be no more snows of Kilimanjaro,” said Gore in 2006 (There’s still snow on Kilimanjaro year-round). Gore also predicted in 2009 ice-free Arctic summers within 5-7 years. John Kerry warned in 2009 that the Arctic would be ice-free by 2013. These people are dishonest, power-hungry hacks. The GREEN NEW SCAM is DEAD!!!

I told Senator Sheldon WhiteClub today that I won’t be listening to or caring about any of his lessons on morality knowing that he joined an all-white Rhode Island Country Club. I’m also done with the likes of AOC, Al Gore, John Kerry, and the rest of the lying cabal that make stupid climate predictions, plunder tens of billions of tax dollars, enrich their well-connected allies, and are committed to strangulating out of existence entire sectors of our economy. Climate alarmist AOC wants to be taken seriously while also insisting the world is imminently about to end due to climate change (Just under 5 years remain on her nutty Jan 2019 prediction that only 12 years of life are left on Earth). Al Gore is now speaking publicly about his concern with global freezing after decades of grift talking about global warming. “Within the decade there will be no more snows of Kilimanjaro,” said Gore in 2006 (There’s still snow on Kilimanjaro year-round). Gore also predicted in 2009 ice-free Arctic summers within 5-7 years. John Kerry warned in 2009 that the Arctic would be ice-free by 2013. These people are dishonest, power-hungry hacks. The GREEN NEW SCAM is DEAD!!!

Lee Zeldin

2,169,563 views • 2 months ago

Twenty years ago, Al Gore warned of imminent polar melt. Today however, Antarctic sea ice is greater than it was at the time Gore made that claim. Satellite records show long periods of stability and even overall expansion. Antarctic wildlife tells the same story. Penguins populations, for example, have expanded their range and increased in number. Globally too, extinction rates are lower today than a century ago, with most losses occurring in the 19th and early 20th centuries due to hunting, habitat destruction, and invasive species - not 'climate change'. The #ClimateCult got it entirely backwards.

Twenty years ago, Al Gore warned of imminent polar melt. Today however, Antarctic sea ice is greater than it was at the time Gore made that claim. Satellite records show long periods of stability and even overall expansion. Antarctic wildlife tells the same story. Penguins populations, for example, have expanded their range and increased in number. Globally too, extinction rates are lower today than a century ago, with most losses occurring in the 19th and early 20th centuries due to hunting, habitat destruction, and invasive species - not 'climate change'. The #ClimateCult got it entirely backwards.

Electroverse

25,031 views • 6 months ago

Show this to an ICE protestor or Democrat. Watch them move mountains to square the circle. Damn, the climate change guru was tough on immigration, shocker! Globalist impresario Al Gore went hard on the illegals. Double standard Democrats, selective amnesia. This one is a doozy! MAGA Al Gore back in 1993 on Immigration Policy. It's hard to say MAGA Al Gore sarcastically. I heard Chris Cuomo say "illegal alien" was wrong and rude, then he threatened Scott Jennings would "get his ass beat" for using the term. I had hope for Cuomo, it evaporated. I'm using the term illegal Chris... And I'm not defending Scott because I don't know him. I will defend the right of Americans to speak the truth. They're illegal and we're not going to argue about that fact. I'll use the same term Al Gore used when I was 2 years old. Royce White for U.S. Senate MN 2026 America 1st, Just Right™️

Show this to an ICE protestor or Democrat. Watch them move mountains to square the circle. Damn, the climate change guru was tough on immigration, shocker! Globalist impresario Al Gore went hard on the illegals. Double standard Democrats, selective amnesia. This one is a doozy! MAGA Al Gore back in 1993 on Immigration Policy. It's hard to say MAGA Al Gore sarcastically. I heard Chris Cuomo say "illegal alien" was wrong and rude, then he threatened Scott Jennings would "get his ass beat" for using the term. I had hope for Cuomo, it evaporated. I'm using the term illegal Chris... And I'm not defending Scott because I don't know him. I will defend the right of Americans to speak the truth. They're illegal and we're not going to argue about that fact. I'll use the same term Al Gore used when I was 2 years old. Royce White for U.S. Senate MN 2026 America 1st, Just Right™️

Royce White 🇺🇸

20,507 views • 6 months ago

Al Gore's "An Inconvenient Truth" won an Oscar. It was everywhere. It became the jet fuel that drove climate change narratives into the minds of children. Two decades later, the headlines read: "Two decades of inconvenient inaccuracies." Why does this matter? Because it's about narratives. We lived through COVID. We saw how narratives allowed lockdowns and forced vaccination. The narrative of climate change - really, Al Gore's documentary - was the jet fuel that embedded this in an entire generation. Here's what a lot of people don't know: Al Gore was sued by the High Court in the UK and lost. In the UK, you can't put biased, false content in front of schoolchildren. Because of that court ruling, schools were required to provide a list of all the biased inaccuracies in the film before showing it. There are over 10 of them. Here's one from Jefferey Jaxen : "The film claims that a study showed that polar bears had drowned due to disappearing Arctic ice. It turned out Mr. Gore had misread the study. In fact, four polar bears drowned, and this was because of a particularly violent storm..." Narratives shape policy. They shape what freedoms you have. They shape what gets injected into your children. And they're often built on inaccuracies that nobody bothers to correct, until it's too late. Watch the breakdown 👉

Al Gore's "An Inconvenient Truth" won an Oscar. It was everywhere. It became the jet fuel that drove climate change narratives into the minds of children. Two decades later, the headlines read: "Two decades of inconvenient inaccuracies." Why does this matter? Because it's about narratives. We lived through COVID. We saw how narratives allowed lockdowns and forced vaccination. The narrative of climate change - really, Al Gore's documentary - was the jet fuel that embedded this in an entire generation. Here's what a lot of people don't know: Al Gore was sued by the High Court in the UK and lost. In the UK, you can't put biased, false content in front of schoolchildren. Because of that court ruling, schools were required to provide a list of all the biased inaccuracies in the film before showing it. There are over 10 of them. Here's one from Jefferey Jaxen : "The film claims that a study showed that polar bears had drowned due to disappearing Arctic ice. It turned out Mr. Gore had misread the study. In fact, four polar bears drowned, and this was because of a particularly violent storm..." Narratives shape policy. They shape what freedoms you have. They shape what gets injected into your children. And they're often built on inaccuracies that nobody bothers to correct, until it's too late. Watch the breakdown 👉

The HighWire

27,896 views • 5 months ago

"1–2 billion climate migrants crossing borders by 2050." Al Gore warns: “It’s hard to imagine what a billion climate migrants would do to our capacity for self-governance.” He says unlivable heat-humidity zones (Sahara, Persian Gulf—lethal outdoors after 4–5 hours) are expanding fast. A few million from one regional drought already fueled authoritarian rises, Orbán, Brexit. Scale that to a billion? Daily heat-trapping pollution = 750,000 Hiroshima bombs exploding every 24 hours. Gulf Stream shutdown? No longer sci-fi. Al Gore has made bold climate predictions before—many of which (ice-free Arctic by 2013, drowned cities, mass starvation timelines) did not materialize as forecasted. If this 1–2 billion migrant figure is in the same category, how seriously should we take it? Do you believe Al Gore on this—or do you think the scale and timeline are overstated?

"1–2 billion climate migrants crossing borders by 2050." Al Gore warns: “It’s hard to imagine what a billion climate migrants would do to our capacity for self-governance.” He says unlivable heat-humidity zones (Sahara, Persian Gulf—lethal outdoors after 4–5 hours) are expanding fast. A few million from one regional drought already fueled authoritarian rises, Orbán, Brexit. Scale that to a billion? Daily heat-trapping pollution = 750,000 Hiroshima bombs exploding every 24 hours. Gulf Stream shutdown? No longer sci-fi. Al Gore has made bold climate predictions before—many of which (ice-free Arctic by 2013, drowned cities, mass starvation timelines) did not materialize as forecasted. If this 1–2 billion migrant figure is in the same category, how seriously should we take it? Do you believe Al Gore on this—or do you think the scale and timeline are overstated?

Camus

14,730 views • 5 months ago

Bill Gates just dropped a bombshell memo on climate change—completely reversing his doomsday rhetoric. For years, Gates, alongside figures like Al Gore, Greta Thunberg, and Barack Obama, warned of apocalyptic climate collapse: coral die-offs, mass extinction, and a planet ravaged by heatwaves and storms. He painted a future so bleak it haunted his dreams, calling for a "world war" against greenhouse gases. But in a stunning about-face ahead of next month’s climate summit in Brazil, Gates now admits: "This view is wrong." In his latest letter, he acknowledges that while climate change will disproportionately harm the poor, it won’t spell humanity’s end. The real threats? Poverty and disease. He even calls the Paris Accord’s 1.5°C target "unrealistic," arguing that diverting resources from vaccines to climate goals could be a deadly miscalculation. Gates also dismisses wind and solar as insufficient, urging a focus on innovation and adaptation—not just emissions cuts. His shift has sparked backlash, with climate scientists like Michael Mann accusing him of ignoring expert warnings. The question now: Is this a pragmatic pivot or a political one? Gates recently met with Trump at the White House. Coincidence? The climate debate just got a lot more complicated.

Bill Gates just dropped a bombshell memo on climate change—completely reversing his doomsday rhetoric. For years, Gates, alongside figures like Al Gore, Greta Thunberg, and Barack Obama, warned of apocalyptic climate collapse: coral die-offs, mass extinction, and a planet ravaged by heatwaves and storms. He painted a future so bleak it haunted his dreams, calling for a "world war" against greenhouse gases. But in a stunning about-face ahead of next month’s climate summit in Brazil, Gates now admits: "This view is wrong." In his latest letter, he acknowledges that while climate change will disproportionately harm the poor, it won’t spell humanity’s end. The real threats? Poverty and disease. He even calls the Paris Accord’s 1.5°C target "unrealistic," arguing that diverting resources from vaccines to climate goals could be a deadly miscalculation. Gates also dismisses wind and solar as insufficient, urging a focus on innovation and adaptation—not just emissions cuts. His shift has sparked backlash, with climate scientists like Michael Mann accusing him of ignoring expert warnings. The question now: Is this a pragmatic pivot or a political one? Gates recently met with Trump at the White House. Coincidence? The climate debate just got a lot more complicated.

Camus

31,175 views • 8 months ago

At Davos, the climate alarmist’s favorite podium, Al Gore is back with a new doom-laden prophecy—and a new product to sell. His spiel is the same tired playbook: a litany of global catastrophes—droughts in Namibia, a drying Amazon, fires in LA—all presented as undeniable proof of the climate apocalypse. He speaks of exponential cost increases, financial collapse, and a housing market poised to lose $25 trillion. The message is clear: be very afraid. But what’s his real pitch? It’s not a call for practical energy solutions. It’s an advertisement. He’s here to promote his new venture, “Climate Trace,” a platform he claims can pinpoint all global emissions. He boasts of satellites, AI, and a “wonderful coalition” of NGOs and institutions—all funded by whom, exactly? This is the classic WEF model: create a problem, sell the fear, and then offer the expensive, centrally-controlled “solution” that hands immense power and data to the very elites gathered in that room. They aren’t solving a crisis; they are managing a narrative to consolidate control and profit from the panic. Gore, a man who has become immensely wealthy from his failed predictions, now wants us to trust his AI to run the world’s economy. The same old fearmongering, just with a new tech wrapper.

At Davos, the climate alarmist’s favorite podium, Al Gore is back with a new doom-laden prophecy—and a new product to sell. His spiel is the same tired playbook: a litany of global catastrophes—droughts in Namibia, a drying Amazon, fires in LA—all presented as undeniable proof of the climate apocalypse. He speaks of exponential cost increases, financial collapse, and a housing market poised to lose $25 trillion. The message is clear: be very afraid. But what’s his real pitch? It’s not a call for practical energy solutions. It’s an advertisement. He’s here to promote his new venture, “Climate Trace,” a platform he claims can pinpoint all global emissions. He boasts of satellites, AI, and a “wonderful coalition” of NGOs and institutions—all funded by whom, exactly? This is the classic WEF model: create a problem, sell the fear, and then offer the expensive, centrally-controlled “solution” that hands immense power and data to the very elites gathered in that room. They aren’t solving a crisis; they are managing a narrative to consolidate control and profit from the panic. Gore, a man who has become immensely wealthy from his failed predictions, now wants us to trust his AI to run the world’s economy. The same old fearmongering, just with a new tech wrapper.

Camus

24,743 views • 10 months ago

Al Gore, "When the US was attacked on 9/11, Denmark immediately responded as part of NATO, and had more per capita casualties than any other member of NATO, defending the US" "NATAO has been a tremendous policy achievement of the US" "As are our effort of other alliances, to establish rule of law, a rules based order" "All of that has benefited the US enormously" "To try and take a wrecking ball to these alliances, the way Trump took a wrecking ball to the East Wing, is literally insane" - Al Gore, "It was a classic Trump performance" "I would hate to be the fact checker who had to go through that speech" "Because of the stock market's reaction yesterday he appears to have backed down from his threat to use military force to acquire Greenland" "That's a good thing, but of course it was crazy he would do such a thing in the first place"

Al Gore, "When the US was attacked on 9/11, Denmark immediately responded as part of NATO, and had more per capita casualties than any other member of NATO, defending the US" "NATAO has been a tremendous policy achievement of the US" "As are our effort of other alliances, to establish rule of law, a rules based order" "All of that has benefited the US enormously" "To try and take a wrecking ball to these alliances, the way Trump took a wrecking ball to the East Wing, is literally insane" - Al Gore, "It was a classic Trump performance" "I would hate to be the fact checker who had to go through that speech" "Because of the stock market's reaction yesterday he appears to have backed down from his threat to use military force to acquire Greenland" "That's a good thing, but of course it was crazy he would do such a thing in the first place"

Farrukh

87,605 views • 6 months ago

Neil Oliver exposes the so-called "climate crisis" as a manufactured hoax, arguing it’s a multi-front war against reason. He points out that global temperatures began rising just as accurate records started—coinciding with Earth’s recovery from the Little Ice Age, a period of extreme cold. "They began measuring at the bottom of a deep well," Oliver says, suggesting warming was inevitable, not alarming. He tackles the demonization of CO2, calling it "plant food" essential for life. At roughly 400 parts per million, atmospheric CO2 is near a critical low. Below 300 ppm, green life collapses—no plants, no animals, no food. Oliver notes that CO2 levels were once in the thousands of ppm, sustaining lush ecosystems. Rising CO2, he argues, greens the planet, citing the Sahara’s ancient verdancy as evidence it wasn’t always a desert. Oliver dismisses the climate narrative as "bogus," driven by profiteers. He highlights Al Gore, whose wealth reportedly grew from a few million to $300 million while championing climate alarmism. "It’s a money-making scheme," Oliver asserts, comparing climate activism to a "carriage on the gravy train." He accuses elites of exploiting the cause for personal gain, entering politics "skinny like worms" and emerging "fat." The climate hoax, Oliver concludes, thrives on distorted science and greed, not truth.

Neil Oliver exposes the so-called "climate crisis" as a manufactured hoax, arguing it’s a multi-front war against reason. He points out that global temperatures began rising just as accurate records started—coinciding with Earth’s recovery from the Little Ice Age, a period of extreme cold. "They began measuring at the bottom of a deep well," Oliver says, suggesting warming was inevitable, not alarming. He tackles the demonization of CO2, calling it "plant food" essential for life. At roughly 400 parts per million, atmospheric CO2 is near a critical low. Below 300 ppm, green life collapses—no plants, no animals, no food. Oliver notes that CO2 levels were once in the thousands of ppm, sustaining lush ecosystems. Rising CO2, he argues, greens the planet, citing the Sahara’s ancient verdancy as evidence it wasn’t always a desert. Oliver dismisses the climate narrative as "bogus," driven by profiteers. He highlights Al Gore, whose wealth reportedly grew from a few million to $300 million while championing climate alarmism. "It’s a money-making scheme," Oliver asserts, comparing climate activism to a "carriage on the gravy train." He accuses elites of exploiting the cause for personal gain, entering politics "skinny like worms" and emerging "fat." The climate hoax, Oliver concludes, thrives on distorted science and greed, not truth.

Camus

12,879 views • 1 year ago

After years of cashing in on climate fear through renewables, fake meat and carbon schemes, Bill Gates is quietly changing his tune. In 2021, Gates warned that climate change would erase coastlines, kill millions and make outdoor life impossible. Now, he says the planet will cope just fine. But this was always the case... Satellite data show a greener planet with CO2 feeding more vegetation. The Lancet confirms cold kills at least 9X more people than heat. And studies point to reduced cloud cover, not CO2, as the main cause of recent warming. Great Barrier Reef coral cover is at record highs. And so too are polar bear populations. The climate didn't collapse. The narrative did.

After years of cashing in on climate fear through renewables, fake meat and carbon schemes, Bill Gates is quietly changing his tune. In 2021, Gates warned that climate change would erase coastlines, kill millions and make outdoor life impossible. Now, he says the planet will cope just fine. But this was always the case... Satellite data show a greener planet with CO2 feeding more vegetation. The Lancet confirms cold kills at least 9X more people than heat. And studies point to reduced cloud cover, not CO2, as the main cause of recent warming. Great Barrier Reef coral cover is at record highs. And so too are polar bear populations. The climate didn't collapse. The narrative did.

Electroverse

18,558 views • 3 months ago

Neil Oliver: "Al Gore and and and the rest of them, they've all got beachfront property...I think the reality is that they know, like the rest of us do, that yes we have climate change, the climate is changeable, the climate is variable like it always has been. But this nonsense about a climate crisis and about a world at boiling point and a world about to burst into flames is errant nonsense." "Putting solar panels everywhere and then the next thing is let's turn down the power of the sun. There's no joined up thinking about it at all. And it is gross hypocrisy. If any of these people meant it, if any of these people, they speak so passionately about the danger that we're all in, they would be living the life themselves as an example. That's how you lead." "It's like Saint Francis of Assisi, you know, was born into wealth. He was he was a rich man's son and he lived the life of a rich man's son until until he got religion, until he got Christianity, and then he gave away everything. And he lived a life of poverty, and he insisted that all of his followers live a life of poverty thereafter. Now that's how you do it. That's that's the way that you get that message across." "You live the life first. And if if by living that life you inspire other people, then they live likewise. But the fact that these people want to preach this nonsense from the bridge of the private jets, or from their goodness only knows what nuclear powered submarines that they want to cut about the world in is just rank hypocrisy." "I've reached a point in my life where I have faith in next to no one. I look out to everyone who's to whom I have to listen on the, coming out of the official mouthpieces. And I find almost all of them completely intolerable."

Neil Oliver: "Al Gore and and and the rest of them, they've all got beachfront property...I think the reality is that they know, like the rest of us do, that yes we have climate change, the climate is changeable, the climate is variable like it always has been. But this nonsense about a climate crisis and about a world at boiling point and a world about to burst into flames is errant nonsense." "Putting solar panels everywhere and then the next thing is let's turn down the power of the sun. There's no joined up thinking about it at all. And it is gross hypocrisy. If any of these people meant it, if any of these people, they speak so passionately about the danger that we're all in, they would be living the life themselves as an example. That's how you lead." "It's like Saint Francis of Assisi, you know, was born into wealth. He was he was a rich man's son and he lived the life of a rich man's son until until he got religion, until he got Christianity, and then he gave away everything. And he lived a life of poverty, and he insisted that all of his followers live a life of poverty thereafter. Now that's how you do it. That's that's the way that you get that message across." "You live the life first. And if if by living that life you inspire other people, then they live likewise. But the fact that these people want to preach this nonsense from the bridge of the private jets, or from their goodness only knows what nuclear powered submarines that they want to cut about the world in is just rank hypocrisy." "I've reached a point in my life where I have faith in next to no one. I look out to everyone who's to whom I have to listen on the, coming out of the official mouthpieces. And I find almost all of them completely intolerable."

Camus

17,019 views • 1 year ago

In 1954, scientists told Congress the Arctic would melt within 25 to 50 years. Then 20 years later, in 1974, Time magazine warned we were heading for another ice age. By the 1990s, when that didn't happen, warming was the returning scare, with Norway's top experts saying the Arctic would be ice-free by 2007. The Centre for Biological Diversity said it would be ice-free by 2012. The BBC said by 2013. Needless to say, they were all wrong. The Arctic sea ice minimum has actually been stable for the past 18 years now. In 2008, NASA's James Hansen predicted Lower Manhattan would be underwater by 2018 due to the burning of fossil fuels. Back in 1923, scientists claimed Glacier National Park would melt by 1950. Then in 2006, Al Gore said it would be gone by 2020. Yet today, the glaciers are still there about the same size they were 35 years ago. Decade after decade, the doomsday dates change, but the climate alarmist script persists.

In 1954, scientists told Congress the Arctic would melt within 25 to 50 years. Then 20 years later, in 1974, Time magazine warned we were heading for another ice age. By the 1990s, when that didn't happen, warming was the returning scare, with Norway's top experts saying the Arctic would be ice-free by 2007. The Centre for Biological Diversity said it would be ice-free by 2012. The BBC said by 2013. Needless to say, they were all wrong. The Arctic sea ice minimum has actually been stable for the past 18 years now. In 2008, NASA's James Hansen predicted Lower Manhattan would be underwater by 2018 due to the burning of fossil fuels. Back in 1923, scientists claimed Glacier National Park would melt by 1950. Then in 2006, Al Gore said it would be gone by 2020. Yet today, the glaciers are still there about the same size they were 35 years ago. Decade after decade, the doomsday dates change, but the climate alarmist script persists.

Electroverse

38,791 views • 3 months ago

The man who invented modern fantasy didn't publish his first novel until he was forty-five. By that age, J.R.R. Tolkien had already built a respectable life. He was an Oxford professor, an expert in ancient languages, with a wife and four children and a settled academic career. He was exactly the kind of man who might reasonably have decided that the shape of his life was already fixed. The work he would be remembered for, he had not yet even begun... The story, which Tolkien told himself, is that one summer he was grading examination papers, when he turned a page and found that a student had left it blank. Without quite knowing why, he wrote a single sentence on it: "In a hole in the ground there lived a hobbit." He did not know what a hobbit was. He had spent years inventing languages and mythologies as a private passion, and telling stories to his own children, never imagining any of it would reach the world. But that one line began to grow. It became a story, and then a book, and in 1937, at the age of forty-five, Tolkien published The Hobbit. It was a success, and his publisher asked for a sequel. Tolkien warned them it might take some time. It took 17 years... He wrote it in the margins of a demanding full-time job, revising endlessly, doubting it often. When The Lord of the Rings was finally published, in 1954 and 1955, he was in his early sixties. That book, begun as a middle-aged professor's private side project, went on to sell well over a hundred million copies, to invent modern fantasy as we know it, and to reshape the imagination of the entire world. Tolkien already had a full and respectable life behind him. And still, the thing he is remembered for, the thing that outlived him and reached hundreds of millions of people, was something he began at forty-five, at an age when it would have been the easiest thing in the world to tell himself he had already missed his chance. He didn't. It's never as late as it feels.

The man who invented modern fantasy didn't publish his first novel until he was forty-five. By that age, J.R.R. Tolkien had already built a respectable life. He was an Oxford professor, an expert in ancient languages, with a wife and four children and a settled academic career. He was exactly the kind of man who might reasonably have decided that the shape of his life was already fixed. The work he would be remembered for, he had not yet even begun... The story, which Tolkien told himself, is that one summer he was grading examination papers, when he turned a page and found that a student had left it blank. Without quite knowing why, he wrote a single sentence on it: "In a hole in the ground there lived a hobbit." He did not know what a hobbit was. He had spent years inventing languages and mythologies as a private passion, and telling stories to his own children, never imagining any of it would reach the world. But that one line began to grow. It became a story, and then a book, and in 1937, at the age of forty-five, Tolkien published The Hobbit. It was a success, and his publisher asked for a sequel. Tolkien warned them it might take some time. It took 17 years... He wrote it in the margins of a demanding full-time job, revising endlessly, doubting it often. When The Lord of the Rings was finally published, in 1954 and 1955, he was in his early sixties. That book, begun as a middle-aged professor's private side project, went on to sell well over a hundred million copies, to invent modern fantasy as we know it, and to reshape the imagination of the entire world. Tolkien already had a full and respectable life behind him. And still, the thing he is remembered for, the thing that outlived him and reached hundreds of millions of people, was something he began at forty-five, at an age when it would have been the easiest thing in the world to tell himself he had already missed his chance. He didn't. It's never as late as it feels.

James Lucas

93,088 views • 21 days ago

Jimmy Dore on Bill Gates’ Climate Change Complete Reversal After years of pushing doomsday climate alarmism, Bill Gates has flipped his stance in a major public reversal. On October 28th, Gates published a memo and spoke on CNBC, dismissing the "cataclysmic climate change" narrative he once supported. Now, he claims climate change "will not lead to humanity’s demise," and people will "live and thrive in most places on Earth for the foreseeable future." This sharp turnaround contradicts Gates’ previous alarming calls warning humanity’s survival was at risk. He now argues that fears about rapid sea level rise, catastrophic hurricanes, and worsening fires were overstated. In fact, he highlights that increased atmospheric carbon has led to more greenery, not less, and that emission projections have declined. Gates urges refocusing efforts away from apocalyptic temperature targets like 1.5 or 2 degrees Celsius, which he says we won't meet, towards improving human welfare, especially in impoverished nations. He stresses the importance of balancing climate action with tackling poverty and disease, pointing out that developing countries have been stuck chasing expensive green solutions instead of affordable fossil fuels. Gates suggests we should prioritize measurable improvements like vaccines and poverty reduction over panicked climate alarmism, even if it means letting temperatures rise slightly. This shift comes amidst criticism of Gates for previous fear-mongering and calls for him to apologize to scientists censored for expressing more moderate views, to young people traumatized by climate dread, and to developing countries boxed in by net zero policies. Meanwhile, Jimmy Dore and others have highlighted this about-face as a validation of years of climate realism and skepticism towards the alarmist orthodoxy. It also fuels distrust in Gates, given his deep vaccine investments and history of public contradictions. In a nutshell, Bill Gates went from climate doomsayer to climate realist advocating a pragmatic approach that prioritizes human lives over chasing impossible temperature goals—a pivot sure to stir controversy, inspire debate, and make many reconsider the climate crisis narrative as we know it.

Jimmy Dore on Bill Gates’ Climate Change Complete Reversal After years of pushing doomsday climate alarmism, Bill Gates has flipped his stance in a major public reversal. On October 28th, Gates published a memo and spoke on CNBC, dismissing the "cataclysmic climate change" narrative he once supported. Now, he claims climate change "will not lead to humanity’s demise," and people will "live and thrive in most places on Earth for the foreseeable future." This sharp turnaround contradicts Gates’ previous alarming calls warning humanity’s survival was at risk. He now argues that fears about rapid sea level rise, catastrophic hurricanes, and worsening fires were overstated. In fact, he highlights that increased atmospheric carbon has led to more greenery, not less, and that emission projections have declined. Gates urges refocusing efforts away from apocalyptic temperature targets like 1.5 or 2 degrees Celsius, which he says we won't meet, towards improving human welfare, especially in impoverished nations. He stresses the importance of balancing climate action with tackling poverty and disease, pointing out that developing countries have been stuck chasing expensive green solutions instead of affordable fossil fuels. Gates suggests we should prioritize measurable improvements like vaccines and poverty reduction over panicked climate alarmism, even if it means letting temperatures rise slightly. This shift comes amidst criticism of Gates for previous fear-mongering and calls for him to apologize to scientists censored for expressing more moderate views, to young people traumatized by climate dread, and to developing countries boxed in by net zero policies. Meanwhile, Jimmy Dore and others have highlighted this about-face as a validation of years of climate realism and skepticism towards the alarmist orthodoxy. It also fuels distrust in Gates, given his deep vaccine investments and history of public contradictions. In a nutshell, Bill Gates went from climate doomsayer to climate realist advocating a pragmatic approach that prioritizes human lives over chasing impossible temperature goals—a pivot sure to stir controversy, inspire debate, and make many reconsider the climate crisis narrative as we know it.

Camus

32,057 views • 8 months ago

Smith: Our case was built on, frankly, Republicans who put their allegiance to the country before the party. And so the President got information from people he trusted on other issues. He rejected it whenever it didn't fit him staying in office. And there was a pattern in our case where any time any information came in that would mean he could no longer be President he would reject it. And any theory, no matter how far-fetched, no matter how not based in law, that would indicate that he could, he latched on to. And we had - we were confident that we had very strong proof of that pattern. He also, I would just add, very consciously did not try to reach out to the sort of people who have the most expertise on these issues. He reached out to people who he thought could back him up.

Sensitive content

Smith: Our case was built on, frankly, Republicans who put their allegiance to the country before the party. And so the President got information from people he trusted on other issues. He rejected it whenever it didn't fit him staying in office. And there was a pattern in our case where any time any information came in that would mean he could no longer be President he would reject it. And any theory, no matter how far-fetched, no matter how not based in law, that would indicate that he could, he latched on to. And we had - we were confident that we had very strong proof of that pattern. He also, I would just add, very consciously did not try to reach out to the sort of people who have the most expertise on these issues. He reached out to people who he thought could back him up.

Acyn

322,386 views • 6 months ago