Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

In a 48-minute address to camera while wearing a T-shirt emblazoned with ‘no place for poverty’, Stevenson delivers a stream of consciousness so self-absorbed that even Meghan Markle would consider it a bit much. After around 40 minutes of grievance-laced rambling, he eventually gets to the point: he’s quitting...

44,152 görüntüleme • 13 gün önce •via X (Twitter)

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Victor Davis Hanson: NEW Information on Obama-Russiagate Setup Surfaces New findings suggest Barack Obama may have personally asked top intelligence officials to fabricate evidence meant to further the Trump-Russia collusion hoax during the final weeks of his presidency. Victor Davis Hanson breaks down role former intelligence heads John Brennan, James Clapper, and James Comey—Obama’s "three blind mice”—played in this on today’s episode of “Victor Davis Hanson: In His Own Words. “There’s new evidence that Barack Obama asked intelligence, investigatory heads—like John Brennan, like James Clapper and James Comey—to "find me evidence that you haven’t found yet so that we can continue the Russian collusion hoax after it was ineffective in the campaign, Hillary lost the election. Now we want to sabotage." This is the subtext of the transition and his presidency. " They were so desperate to validate it. They said to Christopher Steele, ‘Just give us some proof. We can use this. We’ll give you a million dollars.’ He couldn’t even come up with a mil—he couldn’t even come up with the substantive arguments to corroborate his own dossier, so he didn’t get the million dollars.” 👉Don’t miss out on Victor’s latest videos by subscribing to The Daily Signal today. You’ll be notified every time a new piece of content drops: 👉If you can’t get enough of Victor Davis Hanson from The Daily Signal, subscribe to his official YouTube channel: 👉He’s also the host of “The Victor Davis Hanson Show,” available wherever you prefer to watch or listen. Links to the show and exclusive content are available on his website: (0:00) Obama's Alleged Involvement in Russia Hoax (1:36) The Role of John Brennan (3:50) The Role of James Clapper (5:03) The Role of James Comey (6:06) Conclusion

The Daily Signal

313,435 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

When Just Meghan Markle Isn’t Enough. One of the funniest examples of media manipulation is how they constantly refer to Catherine as “Kate Middleton” while bending over backwards to call Meghan “the Duchess of Sussex” in every other sentence. What makes it so amusing is that “Kate Middleton” still outshines “The Duchess of Sussex.” Catherine doesn’t need a title to be recognised, admired, respected, or loved. Call her Kate Middleton, Catherine, Princess of Wales, or future Queen - people know exactly who she is. Meanwhile, the endless insistence on “Duchess of Sussex” for Meghan, despite her no longer being a working royal and despite years of attacking the institution that granted the title, creates the opposite impression. It proves that “Meghan Markle” alone isn’t enough to carry the headline. Catherine never has to lean on hers. However, Meghan Markle needs HRH on a gift basket sent to a so called friend and “Meghan, Duchess of Sussex” announced when a journalist arrives for an interview, despite there reportedly being only two people there. Talk about overcompensating. 🤭 That constant need to attach the title to everything doesn’t make her seem more important. It highlights how little standalone impact “Meghan Markle” actually has. And to everyone who claims to hate the monarchy while insisting on calling her “The Duchess of Sussex” at every opportunity, thanks for proving the point. If titles are so meaningless and outdated, why cling to this one so desperately? The truth is, you’re not promoting Meghan Markle. You’re promoting the title. And in doing so, you’re highlighting exactly how much of the appeal is tied to being a Duchess rather than simply being Meghan Markle. I understand the frustration. She’ll never be the future Queen. But the constant reliance on the title only reinforces what many of you are trying so hard to deny: Meghan Markle alone isn’t enough.

Queen Esther

142,297 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Hanson argued Brennan’s pattern didn’t stop there, either. It reached its most destructive point during the 2020 election. He described the moment the Hunter Biden laptop story threatened to derail Biden’s campaign. “The pièce de résistance for John Brennan was in October 2020, on the eve of the second and critical presidential debate, Joe Biden was in trouble. People were furious about this laptop. There was pornography on it. There was drug use,” Hanson recounted. “There was references to Joe Biden as Mr. Big Guy, 10% that he'd been given money. He was crooked.” Hanson walked through how Biden’s team moved to kill the story by calling in favors. “So what happened? Antony Blinken, his future Secretary of State, campaign aid called Michael Morell, interim CIA Director at one point, said ‘round them up’. So 51, quote unquote, intelligence authorities swore that the laptop had all the hallmarks of Russian information.” Brennan’s name was on that letter. “So what happened in the debate? Trump went right after Biden and said that laptop is real. It shows that you're a crook. It shows your son is a miscreant. And Joe Biden [said] ‘How dare you? 51 intelligence authorities swear that it's a product of Russian espionage.’” And it worked. “It was effective,” Hanson said. But Hanson made clear the real scandal came after the election. “Later, a poll showed—that if people had known that it had been authenticated, and, by the way, that laptop was sitting in the hands of the FBI and adjudicated to be authentic and not released to the public at a time when James Comey's if excuse me, Christopher Wray’s FBI was partnering with Twitter and Facebook to suppress any news story that was accurately reporting that the laptop was authentic.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

56,306 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Meghan Markle: “I wasn’t just being thrown to the wolves. I was being fed to the wolves.” Also Meghan Markle: here’s our Oprah interview, here’s our Netflix documentary, here’s Harry’s memoir, here’s our podcasts, here’s our magazine interviews, and here’s another anonymous source briefing the media. Sorry, but do people really believe everything these two say? Even listening to their story in their own words, it comes across as an incredibly self-serving narrative. We’re supposed to believe a love story that began with Harry seeing Meghan on Instagram with a dog filter and asking, “Who is that?” I swear he himself doesn’t even believe what he is saying. Then we’re told they wanted to take things slowly, yet the relationship moved at breakneck speed. And then there’s Meghan talking about how she had her life, her path, her career until she met H. A career doing what exactly, Meghan Markle? The way she tells it, you’d think she was a global superstar at the height of her profession. The reality was a lot less dramatic. The constant rewriting of history is exhausting. And the complete lack of self-awareness. They spent years accusing the Royal Family of leaking and briefing the press while making a career out of telling their very self serving side of every private family disagreement. Even now, we’re getting stories weeks before Harry’s supposed UK trip about possibly bringing Archie and Lili, visiting Diana’s grave, and all sorts of personal family details. If privacy is so important, why is any of that being briefed to the media in the first place? Nobody has revealed more private family conversations, more family grievances, or more personal details than Harry and Meghan themselves. Yet somehow we’re still expected to believe they’re the victims of leaks and briefings. Harry and Meghan demand privacy while constantly managing a public narrative. Most people who want privacy simply live their lives. They don’t announce every grievance, every family dispute, every visit, every plan and every emotion through interviews, books, documentaries and briefings.

Queen Esther

114,634 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Victor Davis Hanson laid out the case bluntly: John Brennan wasn’t just a bureaucrat who played politics, but someone who built a career on reinvention, spin, and outright lies....and left a trail of wreckage in American politics that’s still being reckoned with. As Hanson put it, there’s a reason Brennan is back in the spotlight. “Recently, Pam Bondi and the Trump Department of Justice has said they are running an investigation into James Comey and John Brennan's career as the respective FBI Director and the CIA head during the Obama administration. And in the case of Comey, the first year of the Trump administration,” he said. “They are very angry about this, but let's just review why there might be some culpability.” Hanson started with Brennan’s talent for switching sides when it suited him. Under George W. Bush, Brennan was a champion of harsh interrogation and Guantanamo. “Take John Brennan. He was a big proponent of waterboarding and enhanced interrogation under George W Bush's administration. And the things that went on in Guantanamo,” Hanson said. But when power changed hands, so did Brennan’s story. “But he flipped to condition himself to go into the Obama administration. And then he attacked the very president that he had served, George Bush.” Hanson described how Brennan went further, rebranding his entire approach to counterterrorism to fit Obama’s worldview. “Then he began sounding, sounding off about Islam, religion of peace, Jihadism is not a violent act, to condition himself further, to be appointed by Obama, which he was eventually as CIA director.” For Hanson, that wasn’t just another political calculation...it set the stage for Brennan’s most brazen deceptions.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

50,453 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce