Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Nothing will deter Meghan Markle from putting herself at the centre of attention, even when it means making a complete spectacle of herself. Whatever that was, it wasn’t charming, relatable, or funny. It was painfully embarrassing to watch. The level of desperation it takes to put yourself in that...

XOQueenEsther's profile picture

Queen Esther

22,575 subscribers

172,242 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

NSFW
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Remember when Prince Harry and Meghan Markle attended Kevin Costner’s first responders fundraiser? Meghan Markle reached for a microphone that wasn’t intended for her. Harry even appeared to gesture for it to be passed to her… and she still didn’t get it. 😭 She immediately switched to directing Harry instead. That whole exchange was painfully awkward and embarrassing. 🙈 Why does Meghan Markle keep putting herself in these situations?
0:28

Remember when Prince Harry and Meghan Markle attended Kevin Costner’s first responders fundraiser? Meghan Markle reached for a microphone that wasn’t intended for her. Harry even appeared to gesture for it to be passed to her… and she still didn’t get it. 😭 She immediately switched to directing Harry instead. That whole exchange was painfully awkward and embarrassing. 🙈 Why does Meghan Markle keep putting herself in these situations?

Queen Esther

640,661 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

This is the level of attention Meghan Markle was expecting when she forced Prince Harry to release a statement confirming they were dating Meghan will NEVER get this level of attention nor could she handle it the way Catherine did and still does to this very day
0:22

This is the level of attention Meghan Markle was expecting when she forced Prince Harry to release a statement confirming they were dating Meghan will NEVER get this level of attention nor could she handle it the way Catherine did and still does to this very day

MeghansMole©️

214,024 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Oprah Winfrey said she called Meghan Markle in early 2018 asking for an interview and was told “it wasn’t the right time.” Now it’s being spun as if the palace blocked it. If Oprah was so interested in Meghan, what stopped her from interviewing her before Harry was even in the picture? Where was that interest when Meghan was just another working actress trying to make it? Where was the sit-down when she was deep in Suits, far from global headlines? No one needed palace permission back then. No one was “banned.” No palace. No restrictions. No “people in the room.” No one to “block” anything. You want to blame the palace as if it was some kind of silencing move, but you fail to understand that instead it exposes what this really is. Meghan Markle was simply not someone Oprah was prioritising for a major sit-down. Nor was Meghan Markle relevant enough for that level of attention. It’s also interesting how Meghan frames it as not being “allowed” to speak privately, with others present, as if that’s unusual. She was about to marry into one of the most scrutinised institutions in the world. Of course communications are structured. That’s not some shocking revelation, that’s standard. Then comes the key line. “Now we can speak freely.” “Now I can say yes.” So what changed? It only became “the right time” once she had the global platform, the title, and the leverage that came with the royal connection. You can’t rewrite this into a story about being silenced by the palace when the timeline shows something much simpler. The demand wasn’t there before Harry. The value wasn’t there before the royal family connection. And suddenly, after everything, we’re supposed to believe this was always about “not being allowed” rather than finally having something to sell. Let that sink it.
1:42

Oprah Winfrey said she called Meghan Markle in early 2018 asking for an interview and was told “it wasn’t the right time.” Now it’s being spun as if the palace blocked it. If Oprah was so interested in Meghan, what stopped her from interviewing her before Harry was even in the picture? Where was that interest when Meghan was just another working actress trying to make it? Where was the sit-down when she was deep in Suits, far from global headlines? No one needed palace permission back then. No one was “banned.” No palace. No restrictions. No “people in the room.” No one to “block” anything. You want to blame the palace as if it was some kind of silencing move, but you fail to understand that instead it exposes what this really is. Meghan Markle was simply not someone Oprah was prioritising for a major sit-down. Nor was Meghan Markle relevant enough for that level of attention. It’s also interesting how Meghan frames it as not being “allowed” to speak privately, with others present, as if that’s unusual. She was about to marry into one of the most scrutinised institutions in the world. Of course communications are structured. That’s not some shocking revelation, that’s standard. Then comes the key line. “Now we can speak freely.” “Now I can say yes.” So what changed? It only became “the right time” once she had the global platform, the title, and the leverage that came with the royal connection. You can’t rewrite this into a story about being silenced by the palace when the timeline shows something much simpler. The demand wasn’t there before Harry. The value wasn’t there before the royal family connection. And suddenly, after everything, we’re supposed to believe this was always about “not being allowed” rather than finally having something to sell. Let that sink it.

Queen Esther

149,986 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Did Meghan Markle let it slip that she does see and read everything about herself? 👀 She seems to keep a lot of tabs on what people are saying about her 🤔
0:32

Did Meghan Markle let it slip that she does see and read everything about herself? 👀 She seems to keep a lot of tabs on what people are saying about her 🤔

British Royaltea

32,391 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

The Extraordinary Grandiosity of Meghan Markle. The disconnect in this interview is astonishing. Meghan says she already had influence during her time on Suits. She talks about people monetising what she wore and how intentional she was in using fashion to elevate brands and designers, almost presenting herself as someone uniquely thoughtful about the opportunities clothing gave her. And somehow, throughout all of it, there is barely any acknowledgement that marrying into one of the most famous institutions in the world might have had something to do with the level of attention she received. Instead, the story becomes: Meghan had the influence. Meghan elevated brands. People monetised Meghan. Meghan used fashion strategically. Meghan was the phenomenon all along. She genuinely believes the influence was always hers. The sheer narcissism of it is astonishing. The constant rewriting of the narrative so that Meghan is always the benefactor rather than the beneficiary, always the one elevating others rather than the one being elevated, is frankly laughable. Royal women have long understood that what they wear sends a message. They have used fashion to champion homegrown talent, support local businesses on tours and bring attention to causes bigger than themselves. They recognised that the platform wasn’t about them. It was about how they could use it in service of something greater. Meghan, on the other hand, often appeared far more interested in established luxury labels and big fashion houses. Yet listening to this interview, she speaks as though she was the one intentionally elevating others, as though this level of thoughtfulness and strategy began with Meghan Markle. To understand the disconnect, if Meghan Markle already had that level of influence from Suits onwards, where were the sell outs? Which brands couldn’t keep stock because Rachel Zane wore a blouse? Where were the websites dedicated to tracking Meghan Markle’s outfits before she became a working royal? And if the influence truly belonged to her alone, where is that same level of impact today? There seems to be no gratitude for the extraordinary platform she was given. No recognition that she stepped into an institution that amplified everything she touched. Just the conviction that she was the gift. Everything is always about Meghan. The influence was hers. The generosity was hers. The strategy was hers. The impact was hers. It’s an astonishing level of self importance to walk away from one of the biggest platforms in the world genuinely believing that everyone else was benefiting from you, rather than recognising just how much you had benefited from them.
3:13

The Extraordinary Grandiosity of Meghan Markle. The disconnect in this interview is astonishing. Meghan says she already had influence during her time on Suits. She talks about people monetising what she wore and how intentional she was in using fashion to elevate brands and designers, almost presenting herself as someone uniquely thoughtful about the opportunities clothing gave her. And somehow, throughout all of it, there is barely any acknowledgement that marrying into one of the most famous institutions in the world might have had something to do with the level of attention she received. Instead, the story becomes: Meghan had the influence. Meghan elevated brands. People monetised Meghan. Meghan used fashion strategically. Meghan was the phenomenon all along. She genuinely believes the influence was always hers. The sheer narcissism of it is astonishing. The constant rewriting of the narrative so that Meghan is always the benefactor rather than the beneficiary, always the one elevating others rather than the one being elevated, is frankly laughable. Royal women have long understood that what they wear sends a message. They have used fashion to champion homegrown talent, support local businesses on tours and bring attention to causes bigger than themselves. They recognised that the platform wasn’t about them. It was about how they could use it in service of something greater. Meghan, on the other hand, often appeared far more interested in established luxury labels and big fashion houses. Yet listening to this interview, she speaks as though she was the one intentionally elevating others, as though this level of thoughtfulness and strategy began with Meghan Markle. To understand the disconnect, if Meghan Markle already had that level of influence from Suits onwards, where were the sell outs? Which brands couldn’t keep stock because Rachel Zane wore a blouse? Where were the websites dedicated to tracking Meghan Markle’s outfits before she became a working royal? And if the influence truly belonged to her alone, where is that same level of impact today? There seems to be no gratitude for the extraordinary platform she was given. No recognition that she stepped into an institution that amplified everything she touched. Just the conviction that she was the gift. Everything is always about Meghan. The influence was hers. The generosity was hers. The strategy was hers. The impact was hers. It’s an astonishing level of self importance to walk away from one of the biggest platforms in the world genuinely believing that everyone else was benefiting from you, rather than recognising just how much you had benefited from them.

Queen Esther

100,702 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

How Meghan Markle Traded Prestige for Publicity Meghan Markle may have pulled off one of the most extraordinary social climbs in modern history. She went from a relatively unknown actress to marrying into the British Royal Family, gaining a global platform, worldwide recognition, access to the highest circles of influence, and opportunities that money alone could never buy. Equally extraordinary is what happened next. Most people spend a lifetime trying to build a personal brand that commands respect, influence, and relevance. Meghan was handed all three almost overnight. She didn’t have to chase attention because attention came to her. Every appearance made headlines. Every public engagement dominated news cycles. Every opportunity was within reach. Yet instead of building something with lasting credibility, she has spent years steadily diminishing the value of her own brand. Today, she’s reduced to desperately hawking matchsticks, bookmarks, and fruit spread while flooding Instagram with increasingly embarrassing attempts to grab attention. The birthday dance is simply the latest in a long line of attention-seeking stunts. It’s almost impossible to reconcile this with someone who once occupied one of the most privileged and influential positions in the world. This isn’t the story of someone who started with nothing and failed. It’s the story of someone who started with almost every imaginable advantage and gradually traded prestige for publicity. Prestige attracts attention. Publicity has to keep chasing it. Somewhere along the way, the goal no longer seemed to be building a respected legacy or a business that could stand on its own. The priority became staying in the headlines, staying on people’s feeds, and staying part of the conversation, no matter how contrived or undignified the spectacle looked. When attention becomes the product, everything else starts to feel like a prop. The saddest part is that none of this was inevitable. She already possessed what millions of celebrities, influencers, and entrepreneurs spend their entire careers chasing: genuine global relevance. It was hers without having to manufacture it. Very few people are ever given a platform that extraordinary. Even fewer manage to squander it so completely. And that’s Meghan Markle.
0:49

How Meghan Markle Traded Prestige for Publicity Meghan Markle may have pulled off one of the most extraordinary social climbs in modern history. She went from a relatively unknown actress to marrying into the British Royal Family, gaining a global platform, worldwide recognition, access to the highest circles of influence, and opportunities that money alone could never buy. Equally extraordinary is what happened next. Most people spend a lifetime trying to build a personal brand that commands respect, influence, and relevance. Meghan was handed all three almost overnight. She didn’t have to chase attention because attention came to her. Every appearance made headlines. Every public engagement dominated news cycles. Every opportunity was within reach. Yet instead of building something with lasting credibility, she has spent years steadily diminishing the value of her own brand. Today, she’s reduced to desperately hawking matchsticks, bookmarks, and fruit spread while flooding Instagram with increasingly embarrassing attempts to grab attention. The birthday dance is simply the latest in a long line of attention-seeking stunts. It’s almost impossible to reconcile this with someone who once occupied one of the most privileged and influential positions in the world. This isn’t the story of someone who started with nothing and failed. It’s the story of someone who started with almost every imaginable advantage and gradually traded prestige for publicity. Prestige attracts attention. Publicity has to keep chasing it. Somewhere along the way, the goal no longer seemed to be building a respected legacy or a business that could stand on its own. The priority became staying in the headlines, staying on people’s feeds, and staying part of the conversation, no matter how contrived or undignified the spectacle looked. When attention becomes the product, everything else starts to feel like a prop. The saddest part is that none of this was inevitable. She already possessed what millions of celebrities, influencers, and entrepreneurs spend their entire careers chasing: genuine global relevance. It was hers without having to manufacture it. Very few people are ever given a platform that extraordinary. Even fewer manage to squander it so completely. And that’s Meghan Markle.

Queen Esther

173,213 Aufrufe • vor 22 Tagen

They say that the clue is in the name, but with Meghan the first two letters give the game away: Me. The Duchess of Sussex is staying true to form by making it all about herself on her and her husband Harry’s tour of Australia. Meghan told a group of students that for a decade she was the ‘most trolled person in the entire world’ online. ✍️ Steerpike Article |
0:28

They say that the clue is in the name, but with Meghan the first two letters give the game away: Me. The Duchess of Sussex is staying true to form by making it all about herself on her and her husband Harry’s tour of Australia. Meghan told a group of students that for a decade she was the ‘most trolled person in the entire world’ online. ✍️ Steerpike Article |

The Spectator

66,801 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

When Just Meghan Markle Isn’t Enough. One of the funniest examples of media manipulation is how they constantly refer to Catherine as “Kate Middleton” while bending over backwards to call Meghan “the Duchess of Sussex” in every other sentence. What makes it so amusing is that “Kate Middleton” still outshines “The Duchess of Sussex.” Catherine doesn’t need a title to be recognised, admired, respected, or loved. Call her Kate Middleton, Catherine, Princess of Wales, or future Queen - people know exactly who she is. Meanwhile, the endless insistence on “Duchess of Sussex” for Meghan, despite her no longer being a working royal and despite years of attacking the institution that granted the title, creates the opposite impression. It proves that “Meghan Markle” alone isn’t enough to carry the headline. Catherine never has to lean on hers. However, Meghan Markle needs HRH on a gift basket sent to a so called friend and “Meghan, Duchess of Sussex” announced when a journalist arrives for an interview, despite there reportedly being only two people there. Talk about overcompensating. 🤭 That constant need to attach the title to everything doesn’t make her seem more important. It highlights how little standalone impact “Meghan Markle” actually has. And to everyone who claims to hate the monarchy while insisting on calling her “The Duchess of Sussex” at every opportunity, thanks for proving the point. If titles are so meaningless and outdated, why cling to this one so desperately? The truth is, you’re not promoting Meghan Markle. You’re promoting the title. And in doing so, you’re highlighting exactly how much of the appeal is tied to being a Duchess rather than simply being Meghan Markle. I understand the frustration. She’ll never be the future Queen. But the constant reliance on the title only reinforces what many of you are trying so hard to deny: Meghan Markle alone isn’t enough.
0:58

When Just Meghan Markle Isn’t Enough. One of the funniest examples of media manipulation is how they constantly refer to Catherine as “Kate Middleton” while bending over backwards to call Meghan “the Duchess of Sussex” in every other sentence. What makes it so amusing is that “Kate Middleton” still outshines “The Duchess of Sussex.” Catherine doesn’t need a title to be recognised, admired, respected, or loved. Call her Kate Middleton, Catherine, Princess of Wales, or future Queen - people know exactly who she is. Meanwhile, the endless insistence on “Duchess of Sussex” for Meghan, despite her no longer being a working royal and despite years of attacking the institution that granted the title, creates the opposite impression. It proves that “Meghan Markle” alone isn’t enough to carry the headline. Catherine never has to lean on hers. However, Meghan Markle needs HRH on a gift basket sent to a so called friend and “Meghan, Duchess of Sussex” announced when a journalist arrives for an interview, despite there reportedly being only two people there. Talk about overcompensating. 🤭 That constant need to attach the title to everything doesn’t make her seem more important. It highlights how little standalone impact “Meghan Markle” actually has. And to everyone who claims to hate the monarchy while insisting on calling her “The Duchess of Sussex” at every opportunity, thanks for proving the point. If titles are so meaningless and outdated, why cling to this one so desperately? The truth is, you’re not promoting Meghan Markle. You’re promoting the title. And in doing so, you’re highlighting exactly how much of the appeal is tied to being a Duchess rather than simply being Meghan Markle. I understand the frustration. She’ll never be the future Queen. But the constant reliance on the title only reinforces what many of you are trying so hard to deny: Meghan Markle alone isn’t enough.

Queen Esther

142,297 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

I’m honestly baffled at the level of entitlement and lack of self-reflection it takes to be a non-disabled person that steals all the wheelchairs at airports from disabled people because you’re too lazy to walk.
0:37

I’m honestly baffled at the level of entitlement and lack of self-reflection it takes to be a non-disabled person that steals all the wheelchairs at airports from disabled people because you’re too lazy to walk.

Melissa

174,692 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Meghan Markle: “I was a hugger… I didn’t realise that is really jarring for a lot of Brits.” Catherine: Turns out the issue wasn’t British reserve - it was Meghan - a narcissistic fake who reeked of insincerity from day one. Some people you instinctively want to embrace. Others you instinctively keep at arm’s length. Catherine clocked the difference immediately. 📽️The Independent
0:35

Meghan Markle: “I was a hugger… I didn’t realise that is really jarring for a lot of Brits.” Catherine: Turns out the issue wasn’t British reserve - it was Meghan - a narcissistic fake who reeked of insincerity from day one. Some people you instinctively want to embrace. Others you instinctively keep at arm’s length. Catherine clocked the difference immediately. 📽️The Independent

British Royaltea

169,394 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Here’s my analysis of why MEGHAN MARKLE LIES with such ease and how the Oprah interview exposed it. There are lies that come from panic. There are lies that come from confusion. Then there are lies that come from entitlement. The kind that slip out smoothly, confidently, without a flicker of worry, because the person saying them believes consequences are for other people. That is exactly what Meghan Markle displayed in the Oprah interview when she claimed she and Harry were married “three days before” their wedding, with the Archbishop of Canterbury. She didn’t frame it as a private vow or a romantic moment. She framed it as an actual marriage. And she did it on global television with a smile, like she was sharing a charming secret. But it wasn’t charming. It wasn’t harmless. And it certainly wasn’t true. It was a lie told with ease because she expected everyone else to absorb it without questioning it. The Lie Was Designed to Sound Like a Fairytale, Not a Fact This is how Meghan operates. She doesn’t just lie, she packages the lie. She wraps it in sentiment and sweetness so the audience reacts emotionally instead of logically. She didn’t say “We exchanged vows privately.” That would be plausible, normal, and not legally loaded. She said “We got married.” That choice of words matters. It changes everything. It turns a private moment into a legal and religious claim. It drags an institution into her story. And it creates pressure on other people to defend themselves. That is the real point. Meghan’s lies are never just personal. They are strategic. This Was Not a “Little Mistake” Because It Had Real Consequences Anyone trying to defend her will call it a misunderstanding. But a misunderstanding does not involve naming the Archbishop of Canterbury and implying a secret marriage happened before a globally televised wedding. Her statement instantly created two outcomes. 1) It cornered the Archbishop into cleaning up her mess By claiming he “married” them days earlier, Meghan effectively placed him in a position where silence would look like confirmation and denial would look like embarrassment. So he had to respond. That is the cruelty in it. It’s not just that she lied. It’s that she lied in a way that forced a senior religious figure to publicly correct her. She put a man of office into the role of damage control, because she wanted a romantic headline. That is not a “slip.” That is reckless and selfish. 2) It undermined the legitimacy of the official wedding Their actual wedding was not private. It was not hidden. It was a historical public event. So why tell the world the “real” marriage happened earlier? Because it reframes the real wedding into something performative, staged, and secondary. It whispers to the audience: That wasn’t for us, that was for them. It’s the same pattern every time. If the institution celebrates her, she uses it. If the institution limits her, she devalues it. Why She Lies With Ease: Because Her Lies Are Tools, Not Errors Meghan does not lie like someone afraid of being caught. She lies like someone who believes truth is flexible.
0:24

Here’s my analysis of why MEGHAN MARKLE LIES with such ease and how the Oprah interview exposed it. There are lies that come from panic. There are lies that come from confusion. Then there are lies that come from entitlement. The kind that slip out smoothly, confidently, without a flicker of worry, because the person saying them believes consequences are for other people. That is exactly what Meghan Markle displayed in the Oprah interview when she claimed she and Harry were married “three days before” their wedding, with the Archbishop of Canterbury. She didn’t frame it as a private vow or a romantic moment. She framed it as an actual marriage. And she did it on global television with a smile, like she was sharing a charming secret. But it wasn’t charming. It wasn’t harmless. And it certainly wasn’t true. It was a lie told with ease because she expected everyone else to absorb it without questioning it. The Lie Was Designed to Sound Like a Fairytale, Not a Fact This is how Meghan operates. She doesn’t just lie, she packages the lie. She wraps it in sentiment and sweetness so the audience reacts emotionally instead of logically. She didn’t say “We exchanged vows privately.” That would be plausible, normal, and not legally loaded. She said “We got married.” That choice of words matters. It changes everything. It turns a private moment into a legal and religious claim. It drags an institution into her story. And it creates pressure on other people to defend themselves. That is the real point. Meghan’s lies are never just personal. They are strategic. This Was Not a “Little Mistake” Because It Had Real Consequences Anyone trying to defend her will call it a misunderstanding. But a misunderstanding does not involve naming the Archbishop of Canterbury and implying a secret marriage happened before a globally televised wedding. Her statement instantly created two outcomes. 1) It cornered the Archbishop into cleaning up her mess By claiming he “married” them days earlier, Meghan effectively placed him in a position where silence would look like confirmation and denial would look like embarrassment. So he had to respond. That is the cruelty in it. It’s not just that she lied. It’s that she lied in a way that forced a senior religious figure to publicly correct her. She put a man of office into the role of damage control, because she wanted a romantic headline. That is not a “slip.” That is reckless and selfish. 2) It undermined the legitimacy of the official wedding Their actual wedding was not private. It was not hidden. It was a historical public event. So why tell the world the “real” marriage happened earlier? Because it reframes the real wedding into something performative, staged, and secondary. It whispers to the audience: That wasn’t for us, that was for them. It’s the same pattern every time. If the institution celebrates her, she uses it. If the institution limits her, she devalues it. Why She Lies With Ease: Because Her Lies Are Tools, Not Errors Meghan does not lie like someone afraid of being caught. She lies like someone who believes truth is flexible.

Queen Esther

110,252 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

A 15 year old boy was hired to shovel part of a driveway for a local business. He spent hours doing it with a shovel. When it was time to pay up, the worker just offered him a plate of food instead of the $100 that they originally agreed upon. It wasn’t until the video was posted on social media and the owner received massive backlash from the community that he spoke out and claimed it was an employee that did it and offered to pay the boy. If this is true, should the person who did it be fired, or is he just saving face at this point?
0:46

A 15 year old boy was hired to shovel part of a driveway for a local business. He spent hours doing it with a shovel. When it was time to pay up, the worker just offered him a plate of food instead of the $100 that they originally agreed upon. It wasn’t until the video was posted on social media and the owner received massive backlash from the community that he spoke out and claimed it was an employee that did it and offered to pay the boy. If this is true, should the person who did it be fired, or is he just saving face at this point?

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

10,948,277 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

No amount of privilege, status, or money can buy class, dignity, integrity, or self restraint. That is why Meghan Markle was never a natural fit for the royal family. The pregnant twerking video is a perfect example. Not because there is anything wrong with dancing while pregnant, but because choosing to post it publicly reflects a mindset completely at odds with the dignity expected of someone who once represented one of the world’s most respected institutions. A classy woman who is secure in her position, respected in her own right, and confident in who she is does not feel the need to turn every personal milestone into content. She does not constantly seek public validation or transform private family moments into engagement opportunities. The video feels less like the behaviour of a woman who was once part of the royal family and more like that of a wannabe influencer desperate to remain relevant and keep herself in the headlines. There is a reason the most respected public figures understand the value of restraint. Not everything needs to be filmed. Not everything needs to be posted. Not everything needs to be turned into a spectacle. Class and dignity are often revealed not by what people choose to show the world, but by what they choose to keep private. And that is precisely why Catherine, Princess of Wales, is the future Queen, while Meghan Markle has come full circle, back to seeking attention, selling matchsticks, and trying to convince the world she is thriving.
1:37

No amount of privilege, status, or money can buy class, dignity, integrity, or self restraint. That is why Meghan Markle was never a natural fit for the royal family. The pregnant twerking video is a perfect example. Not because there is anything wrong with dancing while pregnant, but because choosing to post it publicly reflects a mindset completely at odds with the dignity expected of someone who once represented one of the world’s most respected institutions. A classy woman who is secure in her position, respected in her own right, and confident in who she is does not feel the need to turn every personal milestone into content. She does not constantly seek public validation or transform private family moments into engagement opportunities. The video feels less like the behaviour of a woman who was once part of the royal family and more like that of a wannabe influencer desperate to remain relevant and keep herself in the headlines. There is a reason the most respected public figures understand the value of restraint. Not everything needs to be filmed. Not everything needs to be posted. Not everything needs to be turned into a spectacle. Class and dignity are often revealed not by what people choose to show the world, but by what they choose to keep private. And that is precisely why Catherine, Princess of Wales, is the future Queen, while Meghan Markle has come full circle, back to seeking attention, selling matchsticks, and trying to convince the world she is thriving.

Queen Esther

149,557 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Meghan Markle says she never corrected Mindy Kaling, and in her words: "I think people right now need to take a closer look at what I said about I'm Sussex now, because it's not really what it sounds like or what it means. Of course I am Meghan Markle. That clip of ours went viral but for all the wrong reasons." Here is the clip. What do you think?
0:28

Meghan Markle says she never corrected Mindy Kaling, and in her words: "I think people right now need to take a closer look at what I said about I'm Sussex now, because it's not really what it sounds like or what it means. Of course I am Meghan Markle. That clip of ours went viral but for all the wrong reasons." Here is the clip. What do you think?

Foster

449,561 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Charles Kanjama: It is a groundbreaking ruling because it is breaking new ground. It is a ruling that, in my view, takes the country a bit backwards on issues of public participation. Personally, I am a bit disappointed on that issue, and I feel that on some of the other aspects that were dealt with by the court, there was a tendency to disregard part of the evidence that was there to challenge. I feel that this groundbreaking judgment of the court had a number of missteps that need to be addressed when the matter goes to the court of appeal #CitizenMondayReport
2:26

Charles Kanjama: It is a groundbreaking ruling because it is breaking new ground. It is a ruling that, in my view, takes the country a bit backwards on issues of public participation. Personally, I am a bit disappointed on that issue, and I feel that on some of the other aspects that were dealt with by the court, there was a tendency to disregard part of the evidence that was there to challenge. I feel that this groundbreaking judgment of the court had a number of missteps that need to be addressed when the matter goes to the court of appeal #CitizenMondayReport

Citizen TV Kenya

14,646 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

📣 BY THE WAY MEGHAN (NEE) MARKLE IS NOT ASHAMED OF HER HER FIRST NAME ‘RACHEL’. Decided to address this long running weird theory that is not for the people that are not weird. 🙂 I’ve always found it fascinating that deranged royalists think that calling Meghan, The Duchess of Sussex by her first name ‘Rachel’ would upset her and that calling her by that name is like a slur, insult or jab to her. It’s not! Meghan is her middle name used by her parents from birth simply because they preferred it in the end to the first name they gave her. It’s that simple. As shown in the clip below 👇 where Meghan happily volunteers to Tv host Rachel Ray in May 2018 that ‘Rachel’ is actually her first name, she is not ashamed of it and if so she wouldn’t have mentioned this as a fun fact about her. 🙂 If not interrupted Meghan was about to explain that her parents called her Meghan. Hence they are responsible for this, not her. Indeed there is no trail that suggests Meghan was ever once widely known as Rachel and that it was her who radically decided to change the name everyone knew her by. She always been known as Meghan! Either way Rachel is equally a cool name too. It’s not a slur or a name people think is not nice. It is a clear example of parasocial behaviour when odd internet individuals come up with theories and project them onto Meghan like deciding she’s ashamed of Rachel and deciding that there’s some sinister reason for why she’s been called Meghan since forever. There isn’t. If you need help with this PSA I believe there is a helpline out there for you somewhere. 🙂 #MeghanSussex #MeghanMarkle
0:31

📣 BY THE WAY MEGHAN (NEE) MARKLE IS NOT ASHAMED OF HER HER FIRST NAME ‘RACHEL’. Decided to address this long running weird theory that is not for the people that are not weird. 🙂 I’ve always found it fascinating that deranged royalists think that calling Meghan, The Duchess of Sussex by her first name ‘Rachel’ would upset her and that calling her by that name is like a slur, insult or jab to her. It’s not! Meghan is her middle name used by her parents from birth simply because they preferred it in the end to the first name they gave her. It’s that simple. As shown in the clip below 👇 where Meghan happily volunteers to Tv host Rachel Ray in May 2018 that ‘Rachel’ is actually her first name, she is not ashamed of it and if so she wouldn’t have mentioned this as a fun fact about her. 🙂 If not interrupted Meghan was about to explain that her parents called her Meghan. Hence they are responsible for this, not her. Indeed there is no trail that suggests Meghan was ever once widely known as Rachel and that it was her who radically decided to change the name everyone knew her by. She always been known as Meghan! Either way Rachel is equally a cool name too. It’s not a slur or a name people think is not nice. It is a clear example of parasocial behaviour when odd internet individuals come up with theories and project them onto Meghan like deciding she’s ashamed of Rachel and deciding that there’s some sinister reason for why she’s been called Meghan since forever. There isn’t. If you need help with this PSA I believe there is a helpline out there for you somewhere. 🙂 #MeghanSussex #MeghanMarkle

Glow Lee

92,179 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Celebrating the Nigerian woman in every woman.💚🇳🇬 “Every single moment that I hear anyone talk about what it means to be a Nigerian woman, it is the most flattering thing to be in that company.” - #Meghan Markle, Duchess of Sussex. #TourNigeria #NigerianFlavours #Nigeria
0:53

Celebrating the Nigerian woman in every woman.💚🇳🇬 “Every single moment that I hear anyone talk about what it means to be a Nigerian woman, it is the most flattering thing to be in that company.” - #Meghan Markle, Duchess of Sussex. #TourNigeria #NigerianFlavours #Nigeria

Tour Nigeria

37,504 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren