正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

In a bizarre statement after being convicted in the 2013 rape case, former Tehelka editor Tarun Tejpal compared himself to jailed activists Umar Khalid and Sharjeel Imam, claiming he too was a "political victim." "Umar Khalid and Sharjeel Imam are in jail. I'm also one of them," Tejpal said...

32,973 次观看 • 5 天前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Our eminent TV anchor, Manak Gupta ji, enthusiastically keeps talking about the “chicken neck speech” whenever asking any question about Sharjeel Imam. In his world view, which is shaped up by the Whatsapp University, Sharjeel has been denied bail for this speech made on 16 Jan 2020. Either Manak wants to mislead his audience or he himself has no knowledge of the case. If the latter is true, I will politely ask him to ask his TV Channel’s research team to do their job properly. That statement in the speech led to 5 separate FIRs where he has already been granted bail by the courts. And even while granting bail Allahabad Court clearly stated "It may be noted that on an undisputed basis neither the applicant called any one to bear arms nor any violence was incited as a result of the speech delivered by the applicant." There is no evidence and material against Sharjeel bhai linking him to the unfortunate riots between 22-24 Feb (more than a month after the speech), therefore the speech is being taken as a means to prejudice the public perception. Even the Honourable Supreme Court has noted in its recent order on bail application of Sharjeel Imam, “It is submitted that the appellant’s role is traceable to the first phase of the conspiracy, which involved deliberate mobilisation, radicalisation and preparation of ground conditions through organised chakka jams, blockage of arterial roads, and disruption of essential services.” Nowhere, the court has said that the roadblock was to divide India or take away Assam as Manak, and other media, wants his audience to believe. Manak in the interview of Asaduddin Owaisi has asked, “why should non-Muslims support AIMIM when Owaisi speaks against the SC order on Sharjeel Imam?” Asaduddin Owaisi sahab, a distinguished parliamentarian, disappointed me that he didn't correct Manak by pointing out that this statement had constructed all the Muslims as anti-national and Hindus as nationalists on a promise that Sharjeel was an anti-Indian person and no Hindu would vote his supporters while Muslims could en-bloc vote for him. Moreover, Owaisi sahab, a barrister by education, seems clueless that he could never say in any public interview that Sharjeel is not being tried for “Chicken Neck Speech” but the Delhi Riots conspiracy case. It is also sad that a parliamentarian of some standing, Owaisi sahab doesn't mention the name of Sharjeel Imam or Umar Khalid and keeps saying “those two people”. Instead of addressing the question of Manak he starts praising himself and blaming Chidambaram. We hope better from a man, who took a principled stand when his brother Akbaruddin was tried by the court under much less stringent acts. The truth is that Sharjeel Imam remains in custody solely due to his role in organising the peaceful Shaheen Bagh protests against CAA. Shaheen Bagh was a historic non-violent resistance, and criminalising it even after 6 years without a trial is the real injustice.

Muzzammil Imam | مزمل إمام

19,017 次观看 • 6 个月前