正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

In a proof-of-stake protocol, validators are trustworthy until proven otherwise. This model leaves gaps where validators can extract uneccessary value from users. When it comes to the user experience, Stellar is the true gold standard. Garand Tyson👇

Stellar

847,394 subscribers

12,589 次观看 • 6 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

MEV bots pulled ~$24M from Ethereum users in 30 days. Vitalik's response? A lot of new acronyms for a very old problem — encrypted mempools, FOCIL, ePBS. All designed to decentralize MEV, not eliminate it. validators still extract value from users, just by a more distributed set of bots. But what if there wasn't any MEV at all? On Stellar, validators earn no fees and transaction ordering is randomized, eliminating most MEV you see on Ethereum. And if someone did try frontrunning? the network can remove them - no fork, no staked capital required.

MEV bots pulled ~$24M from Ethereum users in 30 days. Vitalik's response? A lot of new acronyms for a very old problem — encrypted mempools, FOCIL, ePBS. All designed to decentralize MEV, not eliminate it. validators still extract value from users, just by a more distributed set of bots. But what if there wasn't any MEV at all? On Stellar, validators earn no fees and transaction ordering is randomized, eliminating most MEV you see on Ethereum. And if someone did try frontrunning? the network can remove them - no fork, no staked capital required.

Stellar

149,000 次观看 • 6 个月前

177 validators. 16B+ FLR staked. 7,000+ delegators☀️ If you want to see where Flare validation stands from geography, stake, uptime, to how to choose a validator and compare, this is the dashboard to bookmark👇

177 validators. 16B+ FLR staked. 7,000+ delegators☀️ If you want to see where Flare validation stands from geography, stake, uptime, to how to choose a validator and compare, this is the dashboard to bookmark👇

Flare ☀️

29,673 次观看 • 1 个月前

$🚨 WHY IS $XRP DECENTRALIZED? 🚨 𝕏RP operates on the XRP Ledger, a distributed ledger technology managed by a network of over 150 independent validators, spread globally, with no single entity controlling more than a small fraction. Ripple, the company associated with XRP, runs only about 3% of these validators, and anyone can run a validator node, ensuring no central authority dominates. The ledger uses a consensus protocol, not proof-of-work or proof-of-stake, where validators agree on transaction validity every few seconds, making it resilient to control or censorship. Unlike Bitcoin, XRP’s supply isn’t mined; it was pre-allocated, with Ripple holding a portion in escrow, released gradually. However, the ledger’s open-source nature and diverse validator pool counter this, as no single party can alter the network’s rules or halt transactions without broad consensus. Comment Below & Follow For More!!👇👇 #XRPL $RLUSD #Ripple #SEC$

🚨 WHY IS $XRP DECENTRALIZED? 🚨 𝕏RP operates on the XRP Ledger, a distributed ledger technology managed by a network of over 150 independent validators, spread globally, with no single entity controlling more than a small fraction. Ripple, the company associated with XRP, runs only about 3% of these validators, and anyone can run a validator node, ensuring no central authority dominates. The ledger uses a consensus protocol, not proof-of-work or proof-of-stake, where validators agree on transaction validity every few seconds, making it resilient to control or censorship. Unlike Bitcoin, XRP’s supply isn’t mined; it was pre-allocated, with Ripple holding a portion in escrow, released gradually. However, the ledger’s open-source nature and diverse validator pool counter this, as no single party can alter the network’s rules or halt transactions without broad consensus. Comment Below & Follow For More!!👇👇 #XRPL $RLUSD #Ripple #SEC

Good Evening Crypto

119,868 次观看 • 1 年前

"we bring the same principles of the equity world to digital assets" Native assets of public permissionless decentralized networks are commodities, not equities. They exclude Bitcoin while keeping ETH/Solana? Do they not know that PoS and PoW are very similar in the principles they are trying to measure? The index composition makes no sense and imo is the scary truth, that institutions in this space struggle hard to 1) understand it 2) how to value it. Protocol revenue here is literally the friction between users and forced stakeholders like miners and validators. The more revenue a protocol earns the more it took away from users to use a network. It's bizarre how this makes sense for an open protocol, it makes absolutely sense for a business and thus equities. The XRP Ledger says, hey its super cheap to make forward progress if just agree on it, no friction no revenue. We are so ahead in our understanding of this space it's not even remotely funny.

"we bring the same principles of the equity world to digital assets" Native assets of public permissionless decentralized networks are commodities, not equities. They exclude Bitcoin while keeping ETH/Solana? Do they not know that PoS and PoW are very similar in the principles they are trying to measure? The index composition makes no sense and imo is the scary truth, that institutions in this space struggle hard to 1) understand it 2) how to value it. Protocol revenue here is literally the friction between users and forced stakeholders like miners and validators. The more revenue a protocol earns the more it took away from users to use a network. It's bizarre how this makes sense for an open protocol, it makes absolutely sense for a business and thus equities. The XRP Ledger says, hey its super cheap to make forward progress if just agree on it, no friction no revenue. We are so ahead in our understanding of this space it's not even remotely funny.

Vet

39,554 次观看 • 1 个月前

The #pDAI picture has become clear, in what some believe are the final moments before the peg p-DaiMaxi has found that the secret L2 will deliver the peg through a protocol using a sealed vault model - where collateral goes in, but isn’t redeemed by us or arbitrage bots. Think of it like the Greyscale model. Where assets flow in and tradable shares are distributed. In this model, #pDAI acts as a share. #pDAI as a share of this vaults value can maintain its peg to $1 without the need for it to be redeemed by the underlying assets. ⬇️ If pDAI $1: The treasury sells pDAI to the market and uses the proceeds to buy #WPLS, #HEX, #PLSX - injecting value into other ecosystem tokens. ⬇️ This is where we’ll see the #Hex encapsulated stakes appear as collateral. This is where the OA bags will end up. This is where our story comes to its climax. #pDAI to $1 Video from @files_dirty 👇

The #pDAI picture has become clear, in what some believe are the final moments before the peg p-DaiMaxi has found that the secret L2 will deliver the peg through a protocol using a sealed vault model - where collateral goes in, but isn’t redeemed by us or arbitrage bots. Think of it like the Greyscale model. Where assets flow in and tradable shares are distributed. In this model, #pDAI acts as a share. #pDAI as a share of this vaults value can maintain its peg to $1 without the need for it to be redeemed by the underlying assets. ⬇️ If pDAI $1: The treasury sells pDAI to the market and uses the proceeds to buy #WPLS, #HEX, #PLSX - injecting value into other ecosystem tokens. ⬇️ This is where we’ll see the #Hex encapsulated stakes appear as collateral. This is where the OA bags will end up. This is where our story comes to its climax. #pDAI to $1 Video from @files_dirty 👇

DecentraliseMe

32,984 次观看 • 1 年前

Introducing The World's First Proof-of-Energy Blockchain Imagine a blockchain that doesn't just consume energy — it generates it. -> Tokens minted only when verified clean energy is produced -> Validators stake real-world Renewable Energy Certificates (RECs) -> Every transaction fuels the renewable energy economy Welcome to the energy-backed economy. Join our Discord and be part of the energy revolution.

Introducing The World's First Proof-of-Energy Blockchain Imagine a blockchain that doesn't just consume energy — it generates it. -> Tokens minted only when verified clean energy is produced -> Validators stake real-world Renewable Energy Certificates (RECs) -> Every transaction fuels the renewable energy economy Welcome to the energy-backed economy. Join our Discord and be part of the energy revolution.

D.Energy

95,812 次观看 • 1 年前

ETHGas transforms blockspace into a tradable asset class. Validators can soon price, trade, and lock in superior yield on blockspace. This is the future of validator economics. Watch our founder, Kevin Lepsoe, explains it 👇

ETHGas transforms blockspace into a tradable asset class. Validators can soon price, trade, and lock in superior yield on blockspace. This is the future of validator economics. Watch our founder, Kevin Lepsoe, explains it 👇

ETHGAS

38,565 次观看 • 10 个月前

Vitalik Buterin explains why proof-of-stake is more secure than proof-of-work “I think proof of stake is very secure because to attack the system, you need to have basically as much stake as the rest of the network. Right now, for example, we have 5 million ETH staking, which means you have to come up with 5 million ETH and then join the network.” At the time of this writing, more than 37 million ETH are being staked, with 3 million ETH waiting to join via the validator queue. At today’s prices, that’s more than $80 billion of ETH someone would have to acquire to attack the network and revert finalized blocks, which is more than the cost of attacking even the Bitcoin network by some estimates. The other defense mechanism that proof-of-stake has that proof-of-work doesn’t is slashing, which makes Ethereum antifragile. Vitalik explains: “Recovering from attacks is much easier in proof-of-stake than proof-of-work. For many kinds of attacks you do against [the Ethereum] network, we have this concept of automatic slashing. In order to revert a finalized block, you basically have to have a big portion of your validators sign two conflicting messages. This is something where once these messages are on the network, you can go and prove ‘these people did it.’ So we have this feature in the protocol where you basically take all these people who provably misbehaved and you burn their coins.” Vitalik also acknowledges the possibility of censoring attacks, where if 1/3rd of validators refuse to attest, the chain can’t finalize. But, as he explains, Ethereum has a contingency plan for this as well: “Everyone who got censored would create a minority chain, and the community would have to do a soft fork. The would have to say, ‘this chain is clearly attacking us and this one is not attacking us, so we’re going to join this chain.’ Then what happens is, on that new chain, the attackers also lose a lot of coins. The difference between proof-of-stake and proof-of-work is that in a proof-of-stake system, you can identify specific participants — and this isn’t a human going in and saying ‘I don’t like you’. It’s all automated.” One last benefit of proof-of-stake is that security scales with the value of the network. As Vitalik put it five years ago, it is really relative security, and not absolute security, that matters: “The security needs of a thing have to be proportional to the size of that thing, because as a thing gets bigger, its enemies become bigger and more well-motivated. If BTC were 100x as big as it is today, the value from destroying it would be 100x higher, and the kinds of actors that would want to care about destroying it would be much bigger and scarier. This is also why countries of all sizes have roughly similarly sized militaries as a percentage of GDP. Hence, cost of attack divided by market cap really is the correct statistic to measure, and in the long run issuance-free PoW really does look not that good." Source: Lex Fridman (Jun 2021)

Vitalik Buterin explains why proof-of-stake is more secure than proof-of-work “I think proof of stake is very secure because to attack the system, you need to have basically as much stake as the rest of the network. Right now, for example, we have 5 million ETH staking, which means you have to come up with 5 million ETH and then join the network.” At the time of this writing, more than 37 million ETH are being staked, with 3 million ETH waiting to join via the validator queue. At today’s prices, that’s more than $80 billion of ETH someone would have to acquire to attack the network and revert finalized blocks, which is more than the cost of attacking even the Bitcoin network by some estimates. The other defense mechanism that proof-of-stake has that proof-of-work doesn’t is slashing, which makes Ethereum antifragile. Vitalik explains: “Recovering from attacks is much easier in proof-of-stake than proof-of-work. For many kinds of attacks you do against [the Ethereum] network, we have this concept of automatic slashing. In order to revert a finalized block, you basically have to have a big portion of your validators sign two conflicting messages. This is something where once these messages are on the network, you can go and prove ‘these people did it.’ So we have this feature in the protocol where you basically take all these people who provably misbehaved and you burn their coins.” Vitalik also acknowledges the possibility of censoring attacks, where if 1/3rd of validators refuse to attest, the chain can’t finalize. But, as he explains, Ethereum has a contingency plan for this as well: “Everyone who got censored would create a minority chain, and the community would have to do a soft fork. The would have to say, ‘this chain is clearly attacking us and this one is not attacking us, so we’re going to join this chain.’ Then what happens is, on that new chain, the attackers also lose a lot of coins. The difference between proof-of-stake and proof-of-work is that in a proof-of-stake system, you can identify specific participants — and this isn’t a human going in and saying ‘I don’t like you’. It’s all automated.” One last benefit of proof-of-stake is that security scales with the value of the network. As Vitalik put it five years ago, it is really relative security, and not absolute security, that matters: “The security needs of a thing have to be proportional to the size of that thing, because as a thing gets bigger, its enemies become bigger and more well-motivated. If BTC were 100x as big as it is today, the value from destroying it would be 100x higher, and the kinds of actors that would want to care about destroying it would be much bigger and scarier. This is also why countries of all sizes have roughly similarly sized militaries as a percentage of GDP. Hence, cost of attack divided by market cap really is the correct statistic to measure, and in the long run issuance-free PoW really does look not that good." Source: Lex Fridman (Jun 2021)

Etherealize

102,091 次观看 • 5 个月前

The PokPok Protocol is live: In this poultry powered universe, chickens are the stars of a high-stakes game backed by a $5B options market. Farmers who raise profitable chickens can stake them on the protocol and earn APR in $PEGG, starting from 10,000%

The PokPok Protocol is live: In this poultry powered universe, chickens are the stars of a high-stakes game backed by a $5B options market. Farmers who raise profitable chickens can stake them on the protocol and earn APR in $PEGG, starting from 10,000%

PokPok Protocol

12,148 次观看 • 2 年前

.meow talks to Youtube co-founder steve chen about UGC and UGM: “You’re obviously one of the pioneers of this thing called UGC, right? User Generated Content. And then what we are seeing now in this space is what I call UGM — User Generated Money. In UGC, the value is created from the users. And then in Web3 or crypto, the value is generated from the users too. In UGC, we move from an era of the big studios—the big studios create the content, they monetize the content, and they get the value from the content. But what you did is that you democratized the process. You allowed users to create the content, market the content too, and also get the value from the content. For example, if you’re Netflix, you have to make the content, market it, and run advertising globally. You go anywhere across the world—Japan, Tokyo, Europe—you see Netflix advertisements everywhere. But in this new era, the users are the ones that market their own content. And the same thing is happening in the crypto world. The users are generating the money, marketing the money, and getting the value of the money. There are a lot of nuances to this but generally speaking, it’s fascinating because we are really at the nexus of UGC and UGM.”

.meow talks to Youtube co-founder steve chen about UGC and UGM: “You’re obviously one of the pioneers of this thing called UGC, right? User Generated Content. And then what we are seeing now in this space is what I call UGM — User Generated Money. In UGC, the value is created from the users. And then in Web3 or crypto, the value is generated from the users too. In UGC, we move from an era of the big studios—the big studios create the content, they monetize the content, and they get the value from the content. But what you did is that you democratized the process. You allowed users to create the content, market the content too, and also get the value from the content. For example, if you’re Netflix, you have to make the content, market it, and run advertising globally. You go anywhere across the world—Japan, Tokyo, Europe—you see Netflix advertisements everywhere. But in this new era, the users are the ones that market their own content. And the same thing is happening in the crypto world. The users are generating the money, marketing the money, and getting the value of the money. There are a lot of nuances to this but generally speaking, it’s fascinating because we are really at the nexus of UGC and UGM.”

Jupiter

106,801 次观看 • 1 年前

The world’s response to israel since October 7 can be boiled down to this. There is a double standard when it comes to Jews and the state of Israel.

The world’s response to israel since October 7 can be boiled down to this. There is a double standard when it comes to Jews and the state of Israel.

⚕️🦁 Maccabi Lev-Ari מכבי לב ארי

697,542 次观看 • 1 年前

What is the value of a domain name in the digital world? Is it just a piece of online real estate, or can it become something more liquid and dynamic? We spoke with Michael Ho of D3 about Doma Protocol (Doma Protocol) the blockchain infrastructure creating a new reality where the internet’s names become liquid, composable, and free from the friction of legacy markets. Watch the full interview 👇

What is the value of a domain name in the digital world? Is it just a piece of online real estate, or can it become something more liquid and dynamic? We spoke with Michael Ho of D3 about Doma Protocol (Doma Protocol) the blockchain infrastructure creating a new reality where the internet’s names become liquid, composable, and free from the friction of legacy markets. Watch the full interview 👇

The Defiant

17,428 次观看 • 10 个月前

$Roboflow charges you for models you have to verify yourself. Introducing Score Studio: the decentralised alternative where every model arrives already proven and ready to work in real world conditions. Every model on the platform is battle-tested through SN44's validation mechanism before you ever touch it. Miners compete, validators score, only the winners survive. You get the output of a permanent open competition, at a fraction of the price. Datasets, annotation, training, deployment. All of it cheaper. All of it validated, accurate and efficient. Need a model that doesn't exist yet? Launch your own model inquiry from the Studio and put the network to work on it. Pay in USD or SN44, straight at subnet level. We're putting the final touches on it now.$

Roboflow charges you for models you have to verify yourself. Introducing Score Studio: the decentralised alternative where every model arrives already proven and ready to work in real world conditions. Every model on the platform is battle-tested through SN44's validation mechanism before you ever touch it. Miners compete, validators score, only the winners survive. You get the output of a permanent open competition, at a fraction of the price. Datasets, annotation, training, deployment. All of it cheaper. All of it validated, accurate and efficient. Need a model that doesn't exist yet? Launch your own model inquiry from the Studio and put the network to work on it. Pay in USD or SN44, straight at subnet level. We're putting the final touches on it now.

Score

34,998 次观看 • 1 个月前

$AI agents are about to redefine the internet. The mistake we made with Large Language Models? We let a handful of corporations capture all the value. Action Model is building a different path. By training through our extension, users gain fractional ownership in the Large Action Model, giving them a real stake in the future of AI. When LLMs emerged, the upside flowed to Big Tech. This time, it doesn’t have to. They’re building AI on our data, and keeping the upside for themselves. Community-owned Large Action Model is how we take it back.$

AI agents are about to redefine the internet. The mistake we made with Large Language Models? We let a handful of corporations capture all the value. Action Model is building a different path. By training through our extension, users gain fractional ownership in the Large Action Model, giving them a real stake in the future of AI. When LLMs emerged, the upside flowed to Big Tech. This time, it doesn’t have to. They’re building AI on our data, and keeping the upside for themselves. Community-owned Large Action Model is how we take it back.

Action Model

77,628 次观看 • 6 个月前

SOL staking could evolve from passive yield into a claim on real network revenue Mert highlights a key part of the Solana staking thesis: stakers can benefit from economic activity happening directly on the network. “Not only are you getting protected from issuance, you’re getting additional real productive yield from actual on chain revenue.” “The validators capture those fees.” “That can only happen on a chain where it can support mass activity at scale.” High frequency traders and market makers pay transaction and MEV fees to get their activity processed. Validators capture that revenue, and some can pass it back to SOL stakers. The model becomes: More onchain activity → more fees → more validator revenue → more productive yield for stakers For Mert, scale is critical. A network needs enough transaction throughput for fees to accumulate into meaningful revenue without making each transaction prohibitively expensive. SOL staking can capture the economic value generated by the network itself. w/ mert, Solana

SOL staking could evolve from passive yield into a claim on real network revenue Mert highlights a key part of the Solana staking thesis: stakers can benefit from economic activity happening directly on the network. “Not only are you getting protected from issuance, you’re getting additional real productive yield from actual on chain revenue.” “The validators capture those fees.” “That can only happen on a chain where it can support mass activity at scale.” High frequency traders and market makers pay transaction and MEV fees to get their activity processed. Validators capture that revenue, and some can pass it back to SOL stakers. The model becomes: More onchain activity → more fees → more validator revenue → more productive yield for stakers For Mert, scale is critical. A network needs enough transaction throughput for fees to accumulate into meaningful revenue without making each transaction prohibitively expensive. SOL staking can capture the economic value generated by the network itself. w/ mert, Solana

Kaiz 🐂🀄️

21,337 次观看 • 12 天前

“If i can add value to the environment that i’m a part of - and the environment feels like I can add value - if i’ made to feel i need to prove my worth and my value i’m not in that space”🎤🔥🔥 Virat said it perfectly, real value doesn’t come from constantly proving yourself. The right environment is where your presence, experience, and intent are already respected. Growth happens where trust exists, not where validation is demanded every day, thats a toxic environment that he is well out of.

“If i can add value to the environment that i’m a part of - and the environment feels like I can add value - if i’ made to feel i need to prove my worth and my value i’m not in that space”🎤🔥🔥 Virat said it perfectly, real value doesn’t come from constantly proving yourself. The right environment is where your presence, experience, and intent are already respected. Growth happens where trust exists, not where validation is demanded every day, thats a toxic environment that he is well out of.

Erika Morris

27,069 次观看 • 3 个月前

Why Choose Core Stake? User-Friendly Dashboards Core Stake offers a more simplified way to gain insights into your $AVAX staking experience: 1️⃣ Potential rewards when considering staking lockup periods 2️⃣ More holistic view of active stake performance and historical rewards See how straightforward it is 👇 (Note, this video is in testnet mode)

Why Choose Core Stake? User-Friendly Dashboards Core Stake offers a more simplified way to gain insights into your $AVAX staking experience: 1️⃣ Potential rewards when considering staking lockup periods 2️⃣ More holistic view of active stake performance and historical rewards See how straightforward it is 👇 (Note, this video is in testnet mode)

Core Wallet 🔺

23,823 次观看 • 2 年前

Chamath on why organizational charts tend to reward the wrong types of employees Rings very true from my experience as well. The more layers you have in a company, the more it accelerates the careers of individuals who are good at playing the corporate game Over time you create a loop where actual technical talent leaves due to lack of career mobility, until you are left with people who sound smart but can accomplish nothing

Chamath on why organizational charts tend to reward the wrong types of employees Rings very true from my experience as well. The more layers you have in a company, the more it accelerates the careers of individuals who are good at playing the corporate game Over time you create a loop where actual technical talent leaves due to lack of career mobility, until you are left with people who sound smart but can accomplish nothing

Boring_Business

165,876 次观看 • 5 个月前