Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

In a recent article, I wrote about different types of vwap & using it intraday. here's a video alongside it. 0:11 - Time based VWAP 1:05 - VWAP Positioning 2:02 - VWAP Settings 2:45 - Session VWAP 4:10 - Anchored VWAP 5:22 - Orderflow 7:35 - Ranges 8:26 -...

35,525 views • 1 day ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

📺🎓Is This Pullback Bullish? Anchored VWAP Has The Answer Please ❤️like, 🔖bookmark, and 🔁share with fellow growth stock traders/investors Despite the recent market pullback, one technical indicator suggests the broader uptrend may still be intact: anchored VWAP. In this educational Short, Ted Zhang explains how anchored VWAP differs from a standard VWAP and why it can be such a powerful tool for identifying whether buyers or sellers remain in control after major market events. Rather than anchoring the indicator to an arbitrary date, you anchor it to meaningful catalysts like the Iran correction low and President Trump's ceasefire announcement. Those events marked major shifts in market sentiment, making them logical reference points for institutional positioning. * On $SPX, both anchored VWAPs have successfully contained the recent pullbacks. Even more encouraging, those levels align closely with the 23.6% Fibonacci retracement, creating a strong cluster of technical support. When multiple indicators point to the same price zone, it often increases the importance of that level. So far, buyers continue to defend it, suggesting the recent weakness looks more like a normal correction within an ongoing uptrend than the start of a larger breakdown. * $QQQ has shown relatively more weakness. It has already slipped below the anchored VWAP drawn from the ceasefire gap, but it found support at the more important anchored VWAP from the Iran correction low. That level also aligns with the June 9 base low around $685, making it one of the most critical support areas on the chart. This effectively represents the market's "last line in the sand" for the current rally. If buyers continue defending this level and the Nasdaq can reclaim the $700 area, the short-term technical picture would improve significantly. * If selling pressure increases, traders would shift their attention to the 38.2% Fibonacci retracement near the 100-day moving average, followed by the 50% retracement, which aligns with the 150-day moving average and the prior breakout area near $640. These overlapping levels would become the next logical support zones. * The broader takeaway is that no single indicator should be used in isolation. At Revere Asset Management, we combine moving averages, anchored VWAPs, Fibonacci retracements and prior support and resistance levels to build a higher-confidence view of market structure. Right now, those indicators continue to suggest that buyers are still defending the trend, making this pullback look constructive rather than outright bearish. * You can find more details about Revere Asset Management in the FAQ section on our website, along with additional insights into our investment process, portfolio structure, and onboarding. ▶️

Revere Asset Management

31,174 views • 1 month ago

🚨 Imagine: buying at 48-68¢ and selling at 100¢. Again. And again. And again. Result: $80k+ in a week without a single emotion. Trader Hcrystallash just surpassed $106,324.71 in total lifetime profit, making over 10,605 automated predictions. It's not luck. It's structural alpha. He created a custom parser that feeds real-time market tick data into a probability matrix driven by 0xomega and Hilbert to mathematically estimate 5-minute noise. The strategy is based on a pure, clinical mean reversion system. No guesswork. Here's the exact logic the bot executes: ⚙️ Main Stack: VWAP + RSI(14) + ATR + Volume + MACD The bot intentionally avoids breakouts and ignores midband fluctuations. It operates strictly under the assumption that a low ATR is required to confirm price compression before any trading strategy can be validated. 🔴 Trigger for a short position (DOWN): • Price is covered by a perfectly flat VWAP • RSI(14) shows overbought conditions • Buying volume is decreasing • Confirmation: MACD divergence (price makes a higher high, MACD makes a lower high) 🟢 Trigger for a long position (UP): • Price is covered by the VWAP • RSI(14) shows oversold conditions • Weak selling volume (sellers are exhausted) • Confirmation: MACD divergence (price makes a lower low, MACD makes a higher low) ⚠️ Note about MACD: The bot is programmed to strictly ignore regular MACD crossovers. It trades only on divergences. Once these conditions are met, the parser feeds the data into the 0xomega and Hilbert models to calculate the true mathematical probability of mean reversion before executing the position. Look at the feed. They buy at 48-68 cents and wait for the price to stabilize at 100 cents. Over and over again. This isn't theory, it's real-time execution with confirmed results. Hcrystallash is making money, while most are overtrading on the noise. Copy trading here:

m|i|ster

69,926 views • 5 months ago