Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

In depth explanation + examples of why sometimes you don't need rag (especially with gemini 2.0)

34,228 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)

11 Yorum

Sully profil fotoğrafı
Sully1 yıl önce

video up on youtube too

Aly Khairy profil fotoğrafı
Aly Khairy1 yıl önce

It's simpler, but still costs a lot more. Maybe break down 1 query into several prompts like "is management optimistic about iphone sales next Q" and feed that to a "risks"prmpr and an "mda" prmpt, retrieve more chunks then feed those chunks to Gemini to get a more rounded answer

Sully profil fotoğrafı
Sully1 yıl önce

Would you rather pay more and have a accurate answer ? I think the cost equation starts to matter less and less

Sohail Hosseini profil fotoğrafı
Sohail Hosseini1 yıl önce

Thanks for sharing!

Raduan Al-Shedivat profil fotoğrafı
Raduan Al-Shedivat1 yıl önce

amazing explainer video, Sully. one thing that you've missed, which is HUGE: **context caching**[1]. basically, now you can send this whole 50k transcript, cache it for subsequent calls, and never ever bother breaking this down for RAG, even for long conversations, because this whole thing will get cached. I am switching most of my LLM use to Gemini after this. [1]:

Sully profil fotoğrafı
Sully1 yıl önce

Agreed I didn’t even mentioned which makes it way cheaper I will say googles caching needs work

D33PS33K profil fotoğrafı
D33PS33K1 yıl önce

KAG vs RAG

David profil fotoğrafı
David1 yıl önce

great video, i just don't understand how google was able to achieve this without crazy hallucinations

Derek Cheung profil fotoğrafı
Derek Cheung1 yıl önce

Thanks Sully! Great work

Nate Pratt profil fotoğrafı
Nate Pratt1 yıl önce

im extracting information from bank statments and need it REALLY accurate what would you recommend?

Sully profil fotoğrafı
Sully1 yıl önce

Gemini

Benzer Videolar