Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

In May 2023, a live streaming world record was set with 32 million concurrent viewers watching the finale of the IPL cricket game. How was this system built? Ashutosh Agrawal was the architect behind this system, and he walks us through how live streaming at scale works, how the...

GergelyOrosz's profile picture

Gergely Orosz

343,205 subscribers

50,597 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

Science & Technology
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

4 Comments

Mario ⚡️'s profile picture
Mario ⚡️1 year ago

@theprogrammerin 🙀

World Sports USA - Turf Experts's profile picture
World Sports USA - Turf Experts2 years ago

Let's take a trip down memory lane to revisit another World Sports project for the historic 2014 FIFA World Cup in Brazil. Today's spotlight is on Arena das Dunas! From efficient drainage systems to HDPE pipes and Tifway 419 turf, we ensured top-notch quality.

narlie choller's profile picture
narlie choller1 year ago

@theprogrammerin Love this

ALIAS's profile picture
ALIAS1 year ago

@theprogrammerin This is so cool. I love technology, man. It’s a brilliant design, too.

Related Videos

. Kent Beck 🌻 is a legend in software engineering: and after coding for 52 years, he's never had more fun than now, he told me. Why? Because AI agents brought back the joy of creating software without the stuff that he's started to hate about coding for so long. Watch or listen: • YouTube: • Spotify: • Apple: Brought to you by: • Sonar — Code quality and code security for ALL code •⁠ Statsig ⁠ — ⁠ The unified platform for flags, analytics, experiments, and more • Augment Code — AI coding assistant that pro engineering teams love Two of my takeaways from this chat with Kent: 𝟭. 𝗞𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗶𝘀 𝗿𝗲-𝗲𝗻𝗲𝗿𝗴𝗶𝘇𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗸𝘀 𝘁𝗼 𝘂𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗔𝗜 𝗮𝗴𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘀 𝘁𝗼 𝗯𝘂𝗶𝗹𝗱 𝘀𝘁𝘂𝗳𝗳. Kent has been coding for 52 years, and the last decade, he’s gotten a lot more tired of all of it: learning yet another new language or framework, or debugging the issues when using the latest framework. What he loves about these AI agents (and AI coding tools) is how he doesn’t need to know exactly all the details: he can now be a lot more ambitious in his projects. Currently, Kent is building a server in Smalltalk (that he’s been wanting to do for many years) and a Language Server Protocol (LSP) for Smalltalk 𝟮. 𝗙𝗮𝗰𝗲𝗯𝗼𝗼𝗸 𝘄𝗿𝗼𝘁𝗲 𝗻𝗼 𝘂𝗻𝗶𝘁 𝘁𝗲𝘀𝘁𝘀 𝗶𝗻 𝟮𝟬𝟭𝟭, 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝘀𝘁𝘂𝗻𝗻𝗲𝗱 𝗞𝗲𝗻𝘁, 𝗯𝗮𝗰𝗸 𝗶𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗱𝗮𝘆. Kent joined Facebook in 2011, and was taken aback by the lack of testing and how everyone pushed code to production without automated testing. What he came to realize – and appreciate! – was how Facebook had several things balancing this out: • Devs took responsibility for their code very seriously • Nothing at Facebook was “someone else’s problem:” devs would fix bugs when they saw them, regardless of whose commit caused it • Feature flags were heavily used for risky code • Facebook did staged rollouts to smaller markets like New Zealand To this date, Facebook ships code to production in a unique way. We covered more in the deepdive Shipping to Production at
1:00

. Kent Beck 🌻 is a legend in software engineering: and after coding for 52 years, he's never had more fun than now, he told me. Why? Because AI agents brought back the joy of creating software without the stuff that he's started to hate about coding for so long. Watch or listen: • YouTube: • Spotify: • Apple: Brought to you by: • Sonar — Code quality and code security for ALL code •⁠ Statsig ⁠ — ⁠ The unified platform for flags, analytics, experiments, and more • Augment Code — AI coding assistant that pro engineering teams love Two of my takeaways from this chat with Kent: 𝟭. 𝗞𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗶𝘀 𝗿𝗲-𝗲𝗻𝗲𝗿𝗴𝗶𝘇𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗸𝘀 𝘁𝗼 𝘂𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗔𝗜 𝗮𝗴𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘀 𝘁𝗼 𝗯𝘂𝗶𝗹𝗱 𝘀𝘁𝘂𝗳𝗳. Kent has been coding for 52 years, and the last decade, he’s gotten a lot more tired of all of it: learning yet another new language or framework, or debugging the issues when using the latest framework. What he loves about these AI agents (and AI coding tools) is how he doesn’t need to know exactly all the details: he can now be a lot more ambitious in his projects. Currently, Kent is building a server in Smalltalk (that he’s been wanting to do for many years) and a Language Server Protocol (LSP) for Smalltalk 𝟮. 𝗙𝗮𝗰𝗲𝗯𝗼𝗼𝗸 𝘄𝗿𝗼𝘁𝗲 𝗻𝗼 𝘂𝗻𝗶𝘁 𝘁𝗲𝘀𝘁𝘀 𝗶𝗻 𝟮𝟬𝟭𝟭, 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝘀𝘁𝘂𝗻𝗻𝗲𝗱 𝗞𝗲𝗻𝘁, 𝗯𝗮𝗰𝗸 𝗶𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗱𝗮𝘆. Kent joined Facebook in 2011, and was taken aback by the lack of testing and how everyone pushed code to production without automated testing. What he came to realize – and appreciate! – was how Facebook had several things balancing this out: • Devs took responsibility for their code very seriously • Nothing at Facebook was “someone else’s problem:” devs would fix bugs when they saw them, regardless of whose commit caused it • Feature flags were heavily used for risky code • Facebook did staged rollouts to smaller markets like New Zealand To this date, Facebook ships code to production in a unique way. We covered more in the deepdive Shipping to Production at

Gergely Orosz

42,526 views • 1 year ago

LIVE TO FIGHT ANOTHER DAY The bully - that's the establishment, have... They know how to beat people up. They know how to gas them. And they have the arms and the equipment. And the mistake was made that the kids ended up playing their game of violence, you know, and they know how to be violent. They've been running it on violence for two thousand years or a million or whatever it is. And nobody can tell me that violence is the way. After all that time, you know... There must be another way. But a lot of people fell for it. And it's understandable in a way. 'Cause when the bully is actually right there, it's pretty hard to say turn the other cheek, baby. But I say turn the other cheek... and run. You know, and like the Indians are supposed to do, you know, which they lost, of course. but, er, was... Live to fight another day. #powertothepeople
0:48

LIVE TO FIGHT ANOTHER DAY The bully - that's the establishment, have... They know how to beat people up. They know how to gas them. And they have the arms and the equipment. And the mistake was made that the kids ended up playing their game of violence, you know, and they know how to be violent. They've been running it on violence for two thousand years or a million or whatever it is. And nobody can tell me that violence is the way. After all that time, you know... There must be another way. But a lot of people fell for it. And it's understandable in a way. 'Cause when the bully is actually right there, it's pretty hard to say turn the other cheek, baby. But I say turn the other cheek... and run. You know, and like the Indians are supposed to do, you know, which they lost, of course. but, er, was... Live to fight another day. #powertothepeople

Yoko Ono

19,873 views • 9 months ago

What is it like to be a founding engineer at a startup, and how do you become one? Michelle Lim joined Warp as the founding engineer, and she's now a founder at Flint AI where she is hiring founding engineers. We talk through her journey and tactics helpful for anyone wanting to make an impact at a startup. Watch or listen: • YouTube: • Spotify: • Apple: Brought to you by: •⁠ Statsig ⁠ — ⁠ The unified platform for flags, analytics, experiments, and more. •⁠ Linear ⁠ — ⁠ The system for modern product development. I really liked how Michelle was realistic how, as a founding engineer, you have two jobs at once: #1: Software engineering. Build the stuff you need to do #2: Everything else to help the business succeed, including lots of things that are not to do with software engineering! Do all of these once you did job #1 well. In return, you get to learn a lot on how a business is built - which will help you if and when you become a founder yourself! Thanks for the great convo, Michelle, and keep it up!
0:58

What is it like to be a founding engineer at a startup, and how do you become one? Michelle Lim joined Warp as the founding engineer, and she's now a founder at Flint AI where she is hiring founding engineers. We talk through her journey and tactics helpful for anyone wanting to make an impact at a startup. Watch or listen: • YouTube: • Spotify: • Apple: Brought to you by: •⁠ Statsig ⁠ — ⁠ The unified platform for flags, analytics, experiments, and more. •⁠ Linear ⁠ — ⁠ The system for modern product development. I really liked how Michelle was realistic how, as a founding engineer, you have two jobs at once: #1: Software engineering. Build the stuff you need to do #2: Everything else to help the business succeed, including lots of things that are not to do with software engineering! Do all of these once you did job #1 well. In return, you get to learn a lot on how a business is built - which will help you if and when you become a founder yourself! Thanks for the great convo, Michelle, and keep it up!

Gergely Orosz

17,126 views • 8 months ago

A few months ago, I bought this small game called Thronefall. Loved it. Turns out, it was built by only two developers, and sold close to 1M copies. How did they do it? In today's The Pragmatic Engineer Podcast episode, we have Jonas Tyroller , one of the two developers join us, open up his editor, and take us through how they built the game using Unity, C# and Blender. Watch the full episode: • YouTube: • Spotify: • Apple: • Summary and transcript: --- Brought to you by: • Formation : Level up your career and compensation with Formation • WorkOS — The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS • Vanta — Automate compliance and simplify security with Vanta --- We cover: • Why indie developers often skip traditional testing and how they find bugs • The developer workflow using Unity, C# and Blender • The two types of prototypes game developers build • Why Jonas spent months building game prototypes in 1-2 days • How Jonas uses ChatGPT to build games • Jonas’s tips on making games that sell • And more! If you enjoy playing games, or one day perhaps could see yourself building your own game: this episode is for you.
0:59

A few months ago, I bought this small game called Thronefall. Loved it. Turns out, it was built by only two developers, and sold close to 1M copies. How did they do it? In today's The Pragmatic Engineer Podcast episode, we have Jonas Tyroller , one of the two developers join us, open up his editor, and take us through how they built the game using Unity, C# and Blender. Watch the full episode: • YouTube: • Spotify: • Apple: • Summary and transcript: --- Brought to you by: • Formation : Level up your career and compensation with Formation • WorkOS — The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS • Vanta — Automate compliance and simplify security with Vanta --- We cover: • Why indie developers often skip traditional testing and how they find bugs • The developer workflow using Unity, C# and Blender • The two types of prototypes game developers build • Why Jonas spent months building game prototypes in 1-2 days • How Jonas uses ChatGPT to build games • Jonas’s tips on making games that sell • And more! If you enjoy playing games, or one day perhaps could see yourself building your own game: this episode is for you.

Gergely Orosz

13,464 views • 1 year ago

This is another excerpt from the interview that's worth a watch. The condescension from the journalist is off the chart, he's absolutely convinced of the supremacy of the Western system and he cannot fathom how the DRC president doesn't see it. Like in this exchange: - "The fact that [you partner with Russia and China] at the expense of democracies doesn't bother you? That these are authoritarian regimes? - "What is democracy?" - "There's a difference when you live in a democracy or in a dictatorship, I assure you there is a big difference." - "What is democracy? I went to China in May last year and I met Chinese people who I spoke to privately who told me they were happy to live in their country and in the system they are in. Who am I to judge this system and say it is not democratic?" - "You know very well these unfortunate folks are deported, arrested, tortured" The view of China and the Global South in general in France is truly batshit insane...
4:34

This is another excerpt from the interview that's worth a watch. The condescension from the journalist is off the chart, he's absolutely convinced of the supremacy of the Western system and he cannot fathom how the DRC president doesn't see it. Like in this exchange: - "The fact that [you partner with Russia and China] at the expense of democracies doesn't bother you? That these are authoritarian regimes? - "What is democracy?" - "There's a difference when you live in a democracy or in a dictatorship, I assure you there is a big difference." - "What is democracy? I went to China in May last year and I met Chinese people who I spoke to privately who told me they were happy to live in their country and in the system they are in. Who am I to judge this system and say it is not democratic?" - "You know very well these unfortunate folks are deported, arrested, tortured" The view of China and the Global South in general in France is truly batshit insane...

Arnaud Bertrand

179,216 views • 2 years ago

"The one thing that's going to be truly future proof is judgment. What is the biggest challenge when you have a thousand AI engineers writing code? AI slop. In an era when you can do everything, the question is which of these things matter. On the engineer side, it is evaluating the code. Which of this code is even valuable? You can have AI engineers writing beautiful code that could be wrong, that could have bugs in it, that could be vulnerable. Someone needs to review it. Make sure to have a human review at some point, especially critical code that is in the core of your system. On the product side is judgment around what needs to be built and evaluating. And similarly in design, you have to have judgment around, does it make sense in the broader design system. I think this judgment is the number one thing that humans are going to bring in an era of infinite productivity."
1:12

"The one thing that's going to be truly future proof is judgment. What is the biggest challenge when you have a thousand AI engineers writing code? AI slop. In an era when you can do everything, the question is which of these things matter. On the engineer side, it is evaluating the code. Which of this code is even valuable? You can have AI engineers writing beautiful code that could be wrong, that could have bugs in it, that could be vulnerable. Someone needs to review it. Make sure to have a human review at some point, especially critical code that is in the core of your system. On the product side is judgment around what needs to be built and evaluating. And similarly in design, you have to have judgment around, does it make sense in the broader design system. I think this judgment is the number one thing that humans are going to bring in an era of infinite productivity."

Patrick OShaughnessy

24,818 views • 6 months ago

Within software architecture, few people shaped the industry as much as Grady Booch. Safe to say he's a true legend. In today's The Pragmatic Engineer Podcast episode, he shares fascinating stories, insights, observations. Listen or watch the full episode: - YouTube: - Spotify, Apple, or web: Thank you to our wonderful sponsors: 🌟 WorkOS — The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS. Learn more at 🌟Sevalla — Deploy anything from preview environments to Docker images. Check it out at 🌟Chronosphere — The observability platform built for control. Get details at --- 3 of my takeaways from this fascinating conversation: 1. Surprising: The US Department of Defense and the military built some of the most complicated software systems in the 70s and 80s. In the 70s, these organizations probably had the most code to deal with - globally! - and things like distributed computing were pioneered thanks to these use cases. 2. The three axes of software architecture Grady argues that when talking about software architecture, we should look at these three dimensions: ceremony, risk and complexity. 3. The economics of software and software architecture are always connected Machine time was very expensive in the 1960s and 1970s, and software had to be written from scratch. Good architecture meant writing highly performant code to utilize these rather limited machines. However, these days, machine time has gotten very cheap, and there are also plenty of “building blocks” at our disposal: from frameworks to cloud services. Software architecture is frequently still connected with cost: to decide on what services and technologies to use, taking the cost aspect into account! I hope you enjoy this conversation - together with a history overview of the last 50 years in software - as much as I did! Thanks a lot Grady Booch
0:43

Within software architecture, few people shaped the industry as much as Grady Booch. Safe to say he's a true legend. In today's The Pragmatic Engineer Podcast episode, he shares fascinating stories, insights, observations. Listen or watch the full episode: - YouTube: - Spotify, Apple, or web: Thank you to our wonderful sponsors: 🌟 WorkOS — The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS. Learn more at 🌟Sevalla — Deploy anything from preview environments to Docker images. Check it out at 🌟Chronosphere — The observability platform built for control. Get details at --- 3 of my takeaways from this fascinating conversation: 1. Surprising: The US Department of Defense and the military built some of the most complicated software systems in the 70s and 80s. In the 70s, these organizations probably had the most code to deal with - globally! - and things like distributed computing were pioneered thanks to these use cases. 2. The three axes of software architecture Grady argues that when talking about software architecture, we should look at these three dimensions: ceremony, risk and complexity. 3. The economics of software and software architecture are always connected Machine time was very expensive in the 1960s and 1970s, and software had to be written from scratch. Good architecture meant writing highly performant code to utilize these rather limited machines. However, these days, machine time has gotten very cheap, and there are also plenty of “building blocks” at our disposal: from frameworks to cloud services. Software architecture is frequently still connected with cost: to decide on what services and technologies to use, taking the cost aspect into account! I hope you enjoy this conversation - together with a history overview of the last 50 years in software - as much as I did! Thanks a lot Grady Booch

Gergely Orosz

55,813 views • 1 year ago

10 days ago, we introduced Splash the Pot to AoF games to test the feature and gather initial input from players. Since then, we’ve been closely monitoring how it performs and how you interact with it and we got a lot of good feedback. Today, we’re ready to move into the next phase with the introduction of new Infused Splash Pots. 💰 CoinPoker will be adding $500,000 extra per week directly into Splash the Pot. This builds on top of the existing system and turns it into a true rewards layer within the game. For context, Splash the Pot works by triggering random drops directly into active hands. These drops come from a shared splash pool built through gameplay, where 100% of the pool of any splash contribution is returned to players. CoinPoker does not take any cut of it. With the addition of infusion, the system is no longer only driven by player contributions. CoinPoker is adding extra funds on top of the existing pool, so splashes now carry additional value that comes directly from us, and its a net positive for the players. In practice, this leads to bigger rewards appearing directly in-game, including Mega Splashes that can reach up to 1000 big blinds. Players can follow splash activity, pool performance, and results directly in the client at any time, with clear visibility into how the system is running. To make the system more balanced across the table, each splash will be split between the pot winner and the rest of the players involved. We’ve tested different ways to structure this split internally, but what percentage should go to the winner versus the rest of the table is something we want to shape together with the community. We’ve set up a poll in the first comment. We’d really appreciate your input. Your feedback is a key part of how we build and improve our rewards systems, and we’ll continue shaping this together with players. Thank you again for your continued support. The CoinPoker Team
0:35

10 days ago, we introduced Splash the Pot to AoF games to test the feature and gather initial input from players. Since then, we’ve been closely monitoring how it performs and how you interact with it and we got a lot of good feedback. Today, we’re ready to move into the next phase with the introduction of new Infused Splash Pots. 💰 CoinPoker will be adding $500,000 extra per week directly into Splash the Pot. This builds on top of the existing system and turns it into a true rewards layer within the game. For context, Splash the Pot works by triggering random drops directly into active hands. These drops come from a shared splash pool built through gameplay, where 100% of the pool of any splash contribution is returned to players. CoinPoker does not take any cut of it. With the addition of infusion, the system is no longer only driven by player contributions. CoinPoker is adding extra funds on top of the existing pool, so splashes now carry additional value that comes directly from us, and its a net positive for the players. In practice, this leads to bigger rewards appearing directly in-game, including Mega Splashes that can reach up to 1000 big blinds. Players can follow splash activity, pool performance, and results directly in the client at any time, with clear visibility into how the system is running. To make the system more balanced across the table, each splash will be split between the pot winner and the rest of the players involved. We’ve tested different ways to structure this split internally, but what percentage should go to the winner versus the rest of the table is something we want to shape together with the community. We’ve set up a poll in the first comment. We’d really appreciate your input. Your feedback is a key part of how we build and improve our rewards systems, and we’ll continue shaping this together with players. Thank you again for your continued support. The CoinPoker Team

CoinPoker

26,696 views • 4 months ago

Pi was built when there were already agent harnesses around. Here’s why Mario Zechner(Mario Zechner), found them suboptimal and built Pi, a minimalist self-modifying agent: #1 - Mario initially was a believer in Claude Code: "I was a believer in Claude code because they were the first that packaged agentic search up in a really compelling package. And at the time that fit my workflow really well. Everything around the LLM was kind of nice and tidy and easy to understand. I was super happy. I was proselytising Claude code." #2 - Reverse engineering Claude Code highlighted the degradation that Mario felt as a user: "I personally like simple tools that are stable and that I can rely on. Even if they have non-deterministic parts, all the deterministic parts should be as stable as possible. That was just not the experience with Claude Code around summer 2025. They would take away your control of the context. They would inject stuff behind your back, which is bad. Then, your workflows stopped working because there's now a system reminder that you don't even see in the UI that would modify the behaviour of the model. They would also do this to the system prompt. I built a little service where I can track the progression or evolution of the system, prompt and tool definitions and, with every release, it was messing with stuff. That just messed with my workflows and I don't appreciate that." #3 - PI was built with an appreciation for simple and reliable tools: "If I commit to a development tool, I want it to be a stable, reliable thing like a hammer. I don't want my hammer to break a different spot every day. That's terrible. We need somebody who goes the full velocity kind of way. But I don't want to work with a tool like that."
2:54

Pi was built when there were already agent harnesses around. Here’s why Mario Zechner(Mario Zechner), found them suboptimal and built Pi, a minimalist self-modifying agent: #1 - Mario initially was a believer in Claude Code: "I was a believer in Claude code because they were the first that packaged agentic search up in a really compelling package. And at the time that fit my workflow really well. Everything around the LLM was kind of nice and tidy and easy to understand. I was super happy. I was proselytising Claude code." #2 - Reverse engineering Claude Code highlighted the degradation that Mario felt as a user: "I personally like simple tools that are stable and that I can rely on. Even if they have non-deterministic parts, all the deterministic parts should be as stable as possible. That was just not the experience with Claude Code around summer 2025. They would take away your control of the context. They would inject stuff behind your back, which is bad. Then, your workflows stopped working because there's now a system reminder that you don't even see in the UI that would modify the behaviour of the model. They would also do this to the system prompt. I built a little service where I can track the progression or evolution of the system, prompt and tool definitions and, with every release, it was messing with stuff. That just messed with my workflows and I don't appreciate that." #3 - PI was built with an appreciation for simple and reliable tools: "If I commit to a development tool, I want it to be a stable, reliable thing like a hammer. I don't want my hammer to break a different spot every day. That's terrible. We need somebody who goes the full velocity kind of way. But I don't want to work with a tool like that."

The Pragmatic Engineer

62,825 views • 3 months ago

This Chinese developer runs 9 agents on Claude Code under a GPT-5.5 orchestrator and they close 500 client tasks a month without a single assistant. His client work is closed without him, on a single laptop and only three subscriptions. The entire system lives on one MacBook Pro M4 with 128 GB of memory and subscriptions to Claude Code and GPT-5.5 cost him approximately $300 a month. There is no CRM, no team, no office only a terminal window with 9 parallel streams. The orchestrator works with a simple system prompt: «You are the orchestrator of a client inbox. Classify every incoming email into 4 categories: code, content, analysis, communication. Delegate to the corresponding worker agent. When the result is ready, check it for completeness, send it to the client on my behalf, and mark the task as closed. Do not ask clarifying questions.» And the orchestrator checks the inbox every 30 seconds, classifies fresh emails, and distributes them to 9 worker agents on Claude Code, each of whom is responsible for their own class of tasks. Here is an example of how one of them closes a request to refactor a client's auth module: Task: refactor user-auth module Broke the monolith into 3 files by responsibilities Added unit tests, coverage increased to 87% Renamed 4 functions to camelCase according to the style guide PR is ready for review, link below» And so about 50 cycles a day. By noon 25 tasks are closed, by dinner 50, and by the end of the month 500. On average, it takes about 7 minutes from the appearance of an email in the inbox to sending the result to the client. This is more than what a live team of 6 developers, copywriters and analysts working 8 hours a day closes. This is no longer an agency. This is a workstation where an orchestrator replaces a manager, and 9 worker agents replace the staff. The pipeline goes from inbox to closing 500 times a month without human participation at any step.
1:32

This Chinese developer runs 9 agents on Claude Code under a GPT-5.5 orchestrator and they close 500 client tasks a month without a single assistant. His client work is closed without him, on a single laptop and only three subscriptions. The entire system lives on one MacBook Pro M4 with 128 GB of memory and subscriptions to Claude Code and GPT-5.5 cost him approximately $300 a month. There is no CRM, no team, no office only a terminal window with 9 parallel streams. The orchestrator works with a simple system prompt: «You are the orchestrator of a client inbox. Classify every incoming email into 4 categories: code, content, analysis, communication. Delegate to the corresponding worker agent. When the result is ready, check it for completeness, send it to the client on my behalf, and mark the task as closed. Do not ask clarifying questions.» And the orchestrator checks the inbox every 30 seconds, classifies fresh emails, and distributes them to 9 worker agents on Claude Code, each of whom is responsible for their own class of tasks. Here is an example of how one of them closes a request to refactor a client's auth module: Task: refactor user-auth module Broke the monolith into 3 files by responsibilities Added unit tests, coverage increased to 87% Renamed 4 functions to camelCase according to the style guide PR is ready for review, link below» And so about 50 cycles a day. By noon 25 tasks are closed, by dinner 50, and by the end of the month 500. On average, it takes about 7 minutes from the appearance of an email in the inbox to sending the result to the client. This is more than what a live team of 6 developers, copywriters and analysts working 8 hours a day closes. This is no longer an agency. This is a workstation where an orchestrator replaces a manager, and 9 worker agents replace the staff. The pipeline goes from inbox to closing 500 times a month without human participation at any step.

Blaze

29,917 views • 3 months ago

INSANE 🚨 American realtor explains how the Los Angeles, California Coastal Commission is going to require $3-$5 million dollars in ground upgrades to EACH of these Malibu homes lost in the Pacific Palisades fire before rebuilding In simple terms. They’re going to take this land “People need to understand is everything here is on septic. Nothing is on a city sewer system. Every dwelling in Malibu has a separate septic system. And these houses in front, many of them were built in the 40s and the 50s and the 60s, and the codes were almost non existent. So they have septic systems that are in place now that are completely unacceptable in 2025, which when they rebuild, not that they'll rebuild in 2025, (more like) 2055 when they rebuild. And they're going to have to update the septic system, which means Coastal Commission, Ocean Sierra Club, dig it all out. And because of the proximity of the ocean, they're going to have to build seawalls so that erosion won't take their septic system. So they're going to be several million dollars into stuff that's buried in the ground. A seawall not above the ground, but a seawall that's in the ground so that the storm and the erosion can't get to it. New septic system, I mean, they may be $3-$5 million dollars into it before one piece of 2x4 is even put up in terms of framing the new house. Do you know how much bureaucracy, red tape and permits worth of nightmare this is going to be? Because regardless of whatever the mayor says, whatever the governor says about expediting this stuff, a septic system is a septic system. The code is the code, the seawall is the seawall. And they're all going to have to happen.”
1:19

INSANE 🚨 American realtor explains how the Los Angeles, California Coastal Commission is going to require $3-$5 million dollars in ground upgrades to EACH of these Malibu homes lost in the Pacific Palisades fire before rebuilding In simple terms. They’re going to take this land “People need to understand is everything here is on septic. Nothing is on a city sewer system. Every dwelling in Malibu has a separate septic system. And these houses in front, many of them were built in the 40s and the 50s and the 60s, and the codes were almost non existent. So they have septic systems that are in place now that are completely unacceptable in 2025, which when they rebuild, not that they'll rebuild in 2025, (more like) 2055 when they rebuild. And they're going to have to update the septic system, which means Coastal Commission, Ocean Sierra Club, dig it all out. And because of the proximity of the ocean, they're going to have to build seawalls so that erosion won't take their septic system. So they're going to be several million dollars into stuff that's buried in the ground. A seawall not above the ground, but a seawall that's in the ground so that the storm and the erosion can't get to it. New septic system, I mean, they may be $3-$5 million dollars into it before one piece of 2x4 is even put up in terms of framing the new house. Do you know how much bureaucracy, red tape and permits worth of nightmare this is going to be? Because regardless of whatever the mayor says, whatever the governor says about expediting this stuff, a septic system is a septic system. The code is the code, the seawall is the seawall. And they're all going to have to happen.”

Wall Street Apes

1,982,299 views • 1 year ago

2025 was an extremely difficult year. Ending it in London with the cast and crew of The Pendragon Cycle was one of the most restorative occasions of my life. This unbelievable group of artists not only fought to make our show, they embodied the spirit of the show in how they fought for each other. We set out to make a great show. To elevate the true and the good honestly and without pandering. To honor ourselves and to honor you. What a privilege it is to finally share the fruit of that effort with you. The Pendragon Cycle: Rise of the Merlin is now streaming DailyWire+ There is a golden realm of light, my friends...
5:48

2025 was an extremely difficult year. Ending it in London with the cast and crew of The Pendragon Cycle was one of the most restorative occasions of my life. This unbelievable group of artists not only fought to make our show, they embodied the spirit of the show in how they fought for each other. We set out to make a great show. To elevate the true and the good honestly and without pandering. To honor ourselves and to honor you. What a privilege it is to finally share the fruit of that effort with you. The Pendragon Cycle: Rise of the Merlin is now streaming DailyWire+ There is a golden realm of light, my friends...

Jeremy Boreing

87,548 views • 6 months ago

Mortal Kombat Shaolin Monks is known for being one of the greatest adventure games of all time, but what a lot of people missed was its unique PvP mode. This game gave you the ability to get very creative with combos and there was nobody better at showcasing this than CHECK. These short clips demonstrate the many different ways you can build your combos and how you can use the stages to alter your combo routes. This was just a fun game mode that was never taken seriously by players, but it is cool to see how much detail went into it and how much the systems inside it allowed you to express yourself. If we get a 3D Kollection, including this game is an absolute must. This game is what you would refer to as "lightning in a bottle".
1:55

Mortal Kombat Shaolin Monks is known for being one of the greatest adventure games of all time, but what a lot of people missed was its unique PvP mode. This game gave you the ability to get very creative with combos and there was nobody better at showcasing this than CHECK. These short clips demonstrate the many different ways you can build your combos and how you can use the stages to alter your combo routes. This was just a fun game mode that was never taken seriously by players, but it is cool to see how much detail went into it and how much the systems inside it allowed you to express yourself. If we get a 3D Kollection, including this game is an absolute must. This game is what you would refer to as "lightning in a bottle".

Mike Hollow

27,994 views • 8 months ago

I know this post might not make sense to MOST of you here but i post it anyway, with A LOT of happiness and nostalgia in me. Something triggered the love of FOOTBALL in all of us. This video here did for me, as a toddler. The SEOUL 1988 Olympics Theme Song. The determination of the athletes, the DRUMBEATS by those Korean mascots near the end of the video, the beauty of the korean calisthenic ladies and the lyrics remind me of how SANE the world was before. How SPORTS was used to hold the world together and bring peoples together in love and harmony, long before betting came in. Long before money and materialism damaged the game. Music was used to teach people how to live and bring the spirit of the game to the fore. I remember as a child, i and my elder brother would sit and watch this video with so much GLEE and rewind the cassette and play over and over again. Until Vheek McArthur was born and he came around with undying love for the red button of the remote control and WIPED OFF this video from the cassette and changed the joy i and my elder brother were enjoying. We never got it back. Lol It is a perfect reminder of how quickly we have retrogressed as a species since then, even with modern development in science and tech. So sad that MOST people here would never be able to relate. It took me 6 days to search for this particular VERSION of this video cos it is even wiped off YouTube. Had to use very deep search modalities and dodgy downloader bots for it. A week spent assiduously looking for it. Nostalgia and The spirit of the game❤️
3:17

I know this post might not make sense to MOST of you here but i post it anyway, with A LOT of happiness and nostalgia in me. Something triggered the love of FOOTBALL in all of us. This video here did for me, as a toddler. The SEOUL 1988 Olympics Theme Song. The determination of the athletes, the DRUMBEATS by those Korean mascots near the end of the video, the beauty of the korean calisthenic ladies and the lyrics remind me of how SANE the world was before. How SPORTS was used to hold the world together and bring peoples together in love and harmony, long before betting came in. Long before money and materialism damaged the game. Music was used to teach people how to live and bring the spirit of the game to the fore. I remember as a child, i and my elder brother would sit and watch this video with so much GLEE and rewind the cassette and play over and over again. Until Vheek McArthur was born and he came around with undying love for the red button of the remote control and WIPED OFF this video from the cassette and changed the joy i and my elder brother were enjoying. We never got it back. Lol It is a perfect reminder of how quickly we have retrogressed as a species since then, even with modern development in science and tech. So sad that MOST people here would never be able to relate. It took me 6 days to search for this particular VERSION of this video cos it is even wiped off YouTube. Had to use very deep search modalities and dodgy downloader bots for it. A week spent assiduously looking for it. Nostalgia and The spirit of the game❤️

Maxvayshia™

19,123 views • 1 year ago

How have servers and the cloud evolved in the last 30 years, and what might be next? Bryan Cantrill (Bryan Cantrill) has been at the thick of the industry since the Dotcom Boom and Bust, and shares fascinating stories from both this time; on how AWS was born; why Kubernetes was key for GCP to gain ground, and why they're building a completely custom server rack computer at Oxide Computer Company. Bryan is one of my all-time favorite people to talk with - don't miss this one. Teaser - he talked about how Jeff Bezos tricked almost everyone in tech to believe that the cloud was a terrible business, and how Oracle (yes, Oracle!) taught him something extremely valuable he uses to this date: • YouTube: • Spotify: • Apple: Thanks to our wonderful season sponsors: •⁠ Statsig ⁠ — ⁠ The unified platform for flags, analytics, experiments, and more. Check it out: •⁠ Linear ⁠ — ⁠ The system for modern product development. They now support AI agents and you can also build your own - see how:
1:10

How have servers and the cloud evolved in the last 30 years, and what might be next? Bryan Cantrill (Bryan Cantrill) has been at the thick of the industry since the Dotcom Boom and Bust, and shares fascinating stories from both this time; on how AWS was born; why Kubernetes was key for GCP to gain ground, and why they're building a completely custom server rack computer at Oxide Computer Company. Bryan is one of my all-time favorite people to talk with - don't miss this one. Teaser - he talked about how Jeff Bezos tricked almost everyone in tech to believe that the cloud was a terrible business, and how Oracle (yes, Oracle!) taught him something extremely valuable he uses to this date: • YouTube: • Spotify: • Apple: Thanks to our wonderful season sponsors: •⁠ Statsig ⁠ — ⁠ The unified platform for flags, analytics, experiments, and more. Check it out: •⁠ Linear ⁠ — ⁠ The system for modern product development. They now support AI agents and you can also build your own - see how:

Gergely Orosz

36,842 views • 7 months ago

IRAN’S TOLL SYSTEM IS NOW LIVE IN THE STRAIT OF HORMUZ In the last 24 hours, around 10 ships have made it through. Here’s how the system works: The IRGC is running an informal checkpoint inside the Strait. 1. Ships submit cargo and vessel details through intermediaries 2. If approved, they pay a fee starting at ~$1 per barrel 3.Payments are accepted in Chinese yuan or stablecoins 4. In return, ships receive a permit code, route instructions, and an escort But here’s the bigger story: This isn’t just about tolls. It’s about money and power. By accepting yuan and crypto, Iran is testing an alternative financial system right at the chokepoint that handles 20% of global oil flows. Here's what they're aiming to do: - China gets more global usage of the yuan - Crypto gets a real-world use case - The US risks losing financial leverage at the margin
0:21

IRAN’S TOLL SYSTEM IS NOW LIVE IN THE STRAIT OF HORMUZ In the last 24 hours, around 10 ships have made it through. Here’s how the system works: The IRGC is running an informal checkpoint inside the Strait. 1. Ships submit cargo and vessel details through intermediaries 2. If approved, they pay a fee starting at ~$1 per barrel 3.Payments are accepted in Chinese yuan or stablecoins 4. In return, ships receive a permit code, route instructions, and an escort But here’s the bigger story: This isn’t just about tolls. It’s about money and power. By accepting yuan and crypto, Iran is testing an alternative financial system right at the chokepoint that handles 20% of global oil flows. Here's what they're aiming to do: - China gets more global usage of the yuan - Crypto gets a real-world use case - The US risks losing financial leverage at the margin

Milk Road Macro

183,885 views • 4 months ago

The Buck Stops Here: Epstein Explains Rentier Oligarchy Plainly: The Dollar is a Debt That Will Never be Repaid Here Epstein very eloquently describes the power of finance capital through debt: for every dollar the bank has, it can lend out 10 in "our system". This is impossible for the average person to understand. You need Hudson to decode WHY this is the case, how the dollar operates as the world reserve (with the Euro as a silly lab experiment that is totally subservient and essentially 1:1) and why one dollar of real money equals 10 of speculative potential. It's because the dollar is where "the buck stops" - no one can claim to want anything else because there is nothing else. You either play with the arcades tokens or you do not play at all. The dollar is a Ponzi scheme that represents a debt to itself; one that will never be repaid. In this sense all dialectics becomes self referential and tautological and contained: the dollar hegemony is both it's own debtor and creditor. Epstein wasn't very smart, all he could understand was "I can make 10 with 1 real one." That's it, it's not hard, it simply requires a person to flush all reality down the toilet and ignore all common sense. At the end of the day in "our system" more debt = more asset value. If you told the average person on the street that you were 100 million in debt and this was your "asset", they would laugh. But you have to pay the bank. The financial oligarch and the US Government doesn't have to pay anyone. In a bizarre way, this is actually Communism. The structure of a system that can command the value multiplication of 1 to 10 must have all possible future trajectories planned, all possible outcomes weighed and measured, and all power and authority. Then they kind of calculation required to temporally move labor power from the future into the present succeeds; this is a time machine. But in the hands of a stunted pedophile rentier elite, futures are not planned, there is no guarantee, and the bounty of the future becomes a triangle on the top of the pyramid without anything but a volatile herd of feudal lords pecking away at it's basis. It cannot sustain what is necessary to access the future. Epstein is so dumb he doesn't realize his entire system was essentially explained to the US government by Hudson in the early 70's when they realized that "the buck stops here." It took the last intelligent Marxist to tell the Empire how it's own money worked. "Fractionalized reserves" as the gateway to unlimited debt.
3:36

The Buck Stops Here: Epstein Explains Rentier Oligarchy Plainly: The Dollar is a Debt That Will Never be Repaid Here Epstein very eloquently describes the power of finance capital through debt: for every dollar the bank has, it can lend out 10 in "our system". This is impossible for the average person to understand. You need Hudson to decode WHY this is the case, how the dollar operates as the world reserve (with the Euro as a silly lab experiment that is totally subservient and essentially 1:1) and why one dollar of real money equals 10 of speculative potential. It's because the dollar is where "the buck stops" - no one can claim to want anything else because there is nothing else. You either play with the arcades tokens or you do not play at all. The dollar is a Ponzi scheme that represents a debt to itself; one that will never be repaid. In this sense all dialectics becomes self referential and tautological and contained: the dollar hegemony is both it's own debtor and creditor. Epstein wasn't very smart, all he could understand was "I can make 10 with 1 real one." That's it, it's not hard, it simply requires a person to flush all reality down the toilet and ignore all common sense. At the end of the day in "our system" more debt = more asset value. If you told the average person on the street that you were 100 million in debt and this was your "asset", they would laugh. But you have to pay the bank. The financial oligarch and the US Government doesn't have to pay anyone. In a bizarre way, this is actually Communism. The structure of a system that can command the value multiplication of 1 to 10 must have all possible future trajectories planned, all possible outcomes weighed and measured, and all power and authority. Then they kind of calculation required to temporally move labor power from the future into the present succeeds; this is a time machine. But in the hands of a stunted pedophile rentier elite, futures are not planned, there is no guarantee, and the bounty of the future becomes a triangle on the top of the pyramid without anything but a volatile herd of feudal lords pecking away at it's basis. It cannot sustain what is necessary to access the future. Epstein is so dumb he doesn't realize his entire system was essentially explained to the US government by Hudson in the early 70's when they realized that "the buck stops here." It took the last intelligent Marxist to tell the Empire how it's own money worked. "Fractionalized reserves" as the gateway to unlimited debt.

Chris Morlock

42,425 views • 6 months ago