正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

In the early 2000s, climate models projected warming, but the actual observations did not follow. The response to this discrepancy was not to revisit the models, it was to revisit the measurements. So... More weather stations were added in the Arctic, the fastest warming region on earth, increasing its...

Electroversenet's profile picture

Electroverse

46,059 subscribers

52,305 次观看 • 8 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治教育科学技术
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Australia's Bureau of Meteorology has been audited station by station. The report reveals that the agency has systematically erased cooling trends from the historical record, replacing them with synthetic warming. At Rutherglen, Victoria for example, raw data from 1913 to 2006 showed a cooling trend. But the Bureau's adjusted chart flips this into warming. No physical justification, just statistical sleight of hand. Comparisons at Deniliquin also reveals the tactic - how past highs have been lowered to fit the narrative. Minimums from 1910 onward here are reduced by as much as 1.8C. These edits weren't based on new evidence. They were applied decades later by opaque homogenization models. The report's author calls it the rewriting of Australia's temperature history. But it's not just happening in Australia. Climate agencies in the UK and US have also cooled the past so as to exaggerate or even fabricate modern warming trends. This manipulated data is then paraded as truth by politicians and the media with the original measurements buried.
1:05

Australia's Bureau of Meteorology has been audited station by station. The report reveals that the agency has systematically erased cooling trends from the historical record, replacing them with synthetic warming. At Rutherglen, Victoria for example, raw data from 1913 to 2006 showed a cooling trend. But the Bureau's adjusted chart flips this into warming. No physical justification, just statistical sleight of hand. Comparisons at Deniliquin also reveals the tactic - how past highs have been lowered to fit the narrative. Minimums from 1910 onward here are reduced by as much as 1.8C. These edits weren't based on new evidence. They were applied decades later by opaque homogenization models. The report's author calls it the rewriting of Australia's temperature history. But it's not just happening in Australia. Climate agencies in the UK and US have also cooled the past so as to exaggerate or even fabricate modern warming trends. This manipulated data is then paraded as truth by politicians and the media with the original measurements buried.

Electroverse

287,224 次观看 • 2 个月前

The UK Met Office has again been caught publishing temperatures from weather stations that don't exist. An FOI revealed Lowestoft closed in 2010, yet the Met Office kept issuing official temperatures for it. The office said they were using "well-correlated" neighboring stations, but the FOI revealed that this was a lie. The numbers were actually coming from a model that was inventing data from 'phantom' neighboring stations. When exposed, they quietly deleted years of readings for Lowestoft, as well as a number of other stations, and added a disclaimer saying their data is "for general interest only." FOIs also show over one third of Met Office stations never existed, and that real high-quality sites like Colwood are ignored. Also, more than 80% of the network is low-grade class 4 or 5, by WMO standards giving 2-5C uncertainty. This is the foundation of the UK's climate record – closed stations, imaginary stations and synthetic temperatures. The Met Office isn't credible.
0:57

The UK Met Office has again been caught publishing temperatures from weather stations that don't exist. An FOI revealed Lowestoft closed in 2010, yet the Met Office kept issuing official temperatures for it. The office said they were using "well-correlated" neighboring stations, but the FOI revealed that this was a lie. The numbers were actually coming from a model that was inventing data from 'phantom' neighboring stations. When exposed, they quietly deleted years of readings for Lowestoft, as well as a number of other stations, and added a disclaimer saying their data is "for general interest only." FOIs also show over one third of Met Office stations never existed, and that real high-quality sites like Colwood are ignored. Also, more than 80% of the network is low-grade class 4 or 5, by WMO standards giving 2-5C uncertainty. This is the foundation of the UK's climate record – closed stations, imaginary stations and synthetic temperatures. The Met Office isn't credible.

Electroverse

101,431 次观看 • 1 个月前

Canada is not warming at twice the global average, as claimed. A report by data scientist Joseph Hickey examined Canada's official temperature records. It found a sudden nationwide 1C jump in 1998. The same year, 72 new stations were added. The increase was simultaneous across the country. But the climate doesn't behave like that. These step changes are what's known as measurement artifacts, typically caused by station moves or instrument changes. Remove the artificial jump, and Canada's supposed warming over the past seven decades largely disappears. Also, the official ECCC dataset contains more than 10,000 cases where daily minimum temperatures exceed maximums. A physical impossibility, of course. Canada's climate policy rests on this data. Correct it, and the government's core warming claim collapses.
0:44

Canada is not warming at twice the global average, as claimed. A report by data scientist Joseph Hickey examined Canada's official temperature records. It found a sudden nationwide 1C jump in 1998. The same year, 72 new stations were added. The increase was simultaneous across the country. But the climate doesn't behave like that. These step changes are what's known as measurement artifacts, typically caused by station moves or instrument changes. Remove the artificial jump, and Canada's supposed warming over the past seven decades largely disappears. Also, the official ECCC dataset contains more than 10,000 cases where daily minimum temperatures exceed maximums. A physical impossibility, of course. Canada's climate policy rests on this data. Correct it, and the government's core warming claim collapses.

Electroverse

13,032 次观看 • 2 个月前

Canada is NOT warming at twice the global average, as claimed by ECCC. A report by data scientist Joseph Hickey examined Canada's official temperature records. It found a sudden nationwide +1C jump in 1998 - the same year 72 new stations were added. The increase was simultaneous across the country. But the climate doesn't behave like that. These step changes are what's known as 'measurement artifacts', typically caused by station moves or instrument changes. Remove the artificial jump, and Canada's warming over the past seven decades largely disappears. Also, the official ECCC dataset contains more than 10,000 cases where daily 'minimum' temperatures exceed 'maximums' - a physical impossibility. Canada's climate policy rests on this data. Correct it, and the government's core warming claim collapses.
0:44

Canada is NOT warming at twice the global average, as claimed by ECCC. A report by data scientist Joseph Hickey examined Canada's official temperature records. It found a sudden nationwide +1C jump in 1998 - the same year 72 new stations were added. The increase was simultaneous across the country. But the climate doesn't behave like that. These step changes are what's known as 'measurement artifacts', typically caused by station moves or instrument changes. Remove the artificial jump, and Canada's warming over the past seven decades largely disappears. Also, the official ECCC dataset contains more than 10,000 cases where daily 'minimum' temperatures exceed 'maximums' - a physical impossibility. Canada's climate policy rests on this data. Correct it, and the government's core warming claim collapses.

Electroverse

15,641 次观看 • 7 个月前

In 2016, the Netherlands Meteorological Institute adjusted temperatures at De Bilt - the country's main climate station. Daily maximums from 1901 to 1950 were lowered by up to 1.9C, which removed 16 of 23 heatwaves from the record. The altered data were then used to claim modern heatwaves were unprecedented. Four researchers challenged the changes. But the institute dismissed the criticism. So the analysis went to peer review. In 2021, it was published, conclusively demonstrating the method systematically erased historical heat extremes. Today, the Meteorological Institute has quietly changed its approach, and as a result, seven erased heatwaves have been restored. Here again, we have a government agency caught rewriting climate history. The Netherlands Meteorological Institute erased heatwaves of the past, ignored critics, and reinstated the truth only when the evidence became impossible to ignore. Policies were built on that manipulated record. Dutch farmers lost livelihoods. Industry and the wider economy paid the price. But accountability is coming...
1:03

In 2016, the Netherlands Meteorological Institute adjusted temperatures at De Bilt - the country's main climate station. Daily maximums from 1901 to 1950 were lowered by up to 1.9C, which removed 16 of 23 heatwaves from the record. The altered data were then used to claim modern heatwaves were unprecedented. Four researchers challenged the changes. But the institute dismissed the criticism. So the analysis went to peer review. In 2021, it was published, conclusively demonstrating the method systematically erased historical heat extremes. Today, the Meteorological Institute has quietly changed its approach, and as a result, seven erased heatwaves have been restored. Here again, we have a government agency caught rewriting climate history. The Netherlands Meteorological Institute erased heatwaves of the past, ignored critics, and reinstated the truth only when the evidence became impossible to ignore. Policies were built on that manipulated record. Dutch farmers lost livelihoods. Industry and the wider economy paid the price. But accountability is coming...

Electroverse

473,137 次观看 • 7 个月前

The global mean surface temperature today is only about 1C warmer than it was in 1880. This modest rise has been framed as a 'climate emergency,' yet in historical context it is trivial. Global temperatures have fluctuated by more than 10C over natural glacial cycles long before industrialization. Even during the Holocene, recent periods such as the Medieval Warm Period were far warmer than today without triggering catastrophe. The data show no runaway warming or planetary collapse. In fact, historical records reveal warmth is beneficial to humanity and to life in general. This disconnect between reality and the apocalyptic rhetoric exposes the ruse. There is no "climate crisis."
0:42

The global mean surface temperature today is only about 1C warmer than it was in 1880. This modest rise has been framed as a 'climate emergency,' yet in historical context it is trivial. Global temperatures have fluctuated by more than 10C over natural glacial cycles long before industrialization. Even during the Holocene, recent periods such as the Medieval Warm Period were far warmer than today without triggering catastrophe. The data show no runaway warming or planetary collapse. In fact, historical records reveal warmth is beneficial to humanity and to life in general. This disconnect between reality and the apocalyptic rhetoric exposes the ruse. There is no "climate crisis."

Electroverse

32,204 次观看 • 2 个月前

We are seeing a lot of confusion about "Body to Body", so just to clear things up: Yoongi and Namjoon were not against using the Arirang sample. What they had concerns about was how it was layered in the track. In the earlier version, the sample was much louder and overlapped with the vocals, which made it overwhelming for listeners. The final version we got is different, with the sample more subtly blended into the background. So, to be clear, they were not against the Arirang sample itself. The version we hear today reflects adjustments made after those initial concerns were raised.
0:33

We are seeing a lot of confusion about "Body to Body", so just to clear things up: Yoongi and Namjoon were not against using the Arirang sample. What they had concerns about was how it was layered in the track. In the earlier version, the sample was much louder and overlapped with the vocals, which made it overwhelming for listeners. The final version we got is different, with the sample more subtly blended into the background. So, to be clear, they were not against the Arirang sample itself. The version we hear today reflects adjustments made after those initial concerns were raised.

AGUST D CHARTS

243,802 次观看 • 5 个月前

Scientists Kesten Green and Willie Soon found that the UN's climate models simply don't work. "IPCC climate models lack predictive validity and cannot guide policy," say the researchers. When tested on real forecasts instead of theory, the CO2-based models failed, often performing worse than just a random guess. Whereas simple models based solely on solar activity worked far better, even decades out. The whole 'climate crisis' depends on these models, not on actual measurements, but many run as much as 5C too hot. The IPCC was never about testing if man-made warming is actually real. It was built to promote the idea that it was real.
0:38

Scientists Kesten Green and Willie Soon found that the UN's climate models simply don't work. "IPCC climate models lack predictive validity and cannot guide policy," say the researchers. When tested on real forecasts instead of theory, the CO2-based models failed, often performing worse than just a random guess. Whereas simple models based solely on solar activity worked far better, even decades out. The whole 'climate crisis' depends on these models, not on actual measurements, but many run as much as 5C too hot. The IPCC was never about testing if man-made warming is actually real. It was built to promote the idea that it was real.

Electroverse

38,576 次观看 • 2 个月前

A new study analyzed daily temperatures from 992 long-running weather stations across 29 countries covering the years 1899 to 2024. Then it compared those temperatures to cumulative human CO2 emissions. They don't match. From 1899 to 1940, the planet warmed at a rate of 0.022 C per year, even though emissions were low. Then from 1941 to 1982, temperatures cooled, despite CO2 emissions more than tripling. From 1983 to 2024, warming returned, but slower than before, at a rate of 0.017 C per year, even as emissions rose 8.6 times higher than during the earlier warming phase. As the author conclude: "These findings challenge the conventional assumption that human-induced CO2 is the primary driver of global warming." This is because the strongest warming occurred before major modern emissions kicked in, and later periods with far more CO2 show weaker warming, or even cooling. Earth's climate is still governed by natural variability.
0:57

A new study analyzed daily temperatures from 992 long-running weather stations across 29 countries covering the years 1899 to 2024. Then it compared those temperatures to cumulative human CO2 emissions. They don't match. From 1899 to 1940, the planet warmed at a rate of 0.022 C per year, even though emissions were low. Then from 1941 to 1982, temperatures cooled, despite CO2 emissions more than tripling. From 1983 to 2024, warming returned, but slower than before, at a rate of 0.017 C per year, even as emissions rose 8.6 times higher than during the earlier warming phase. As the author conclude: "These findings challenge the conventional assumption that human-induced CO2 is the primary driver of global warming." This is because the strongest warming occurred before major modern emissions kicked in, and later periods with far more CO2 show weaker warming, or even cooling. Earth's climate is still governed by natural variability.

Electroverse

32,924 次观看 • 16 天前

During the 2020 Election votes on DOMINION voting machines were disappearing and appearing in the dead of night in CLARKE and FULTON COUNTY, Georgia. Logs stored on USB drives required by law were changed from the end of one vote count day, at close, to the next day, when the counting resumed the next day. When an audit was granted, a useless visual examination of ONLY the outside of the USB drives were allowed. No internal information on the USB drives were allowed to be accessed during the audit. This coincides with the recent information what also happened in Fulton county, GA, with their logs from election officials when election stations were opened and closed as well, which 315,000 votes were not authenticated because the chain of custody was broken. Hundreds of thousands of duplicate votes were also counted and a total of 364,000 ineligible voters were NOT cleaned off of the voter roles prior to the election, WHY? Because it was a cover-up. They knew EXACTLY what they were doing, and that was to steal the 2020 Election.
4:17

During the 2020 Election votes on DOMINION voting machines were disappearing and appearing in the dead of night in CLARKE and FULTON COUNTY, Georgia. Logs stored on USB drives required by law were changed from the end of one vote count day, at close, to the next day, when the counting resumed the next day. When an audit was granted, a useless visual examination of ONLY the outside of the USB drives were allowed. No internal information on the USB drives were allowed to be accessed during the audit. This coincides with the recent information what also happened in Fulton county, GA, with their logs from election officials when election stations were opened and closed as well, which 315,000 votes were not authenticated because the chain of custody was broken. Hundreds of thousands of duplicate votes were also counted and a total of 364,000 ineligible voters were NOT cleaned off of the voter roles prior to the election, WHY? Because it was a cover-up. They knew EXACTLY what they were doing, and that was to steal the 2020 Election.

The SCIF

79,077 次观看 • 9 个月前

The United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change ( IPCC) was not created by a group of scientists in the late-1980s with the intention of studying both natural and man-made impacts on the global climate system. That did not happen. Period. Why would the IPCC be needed on the scientific front when there were already government agencies like the BoM, Met Office, NASA, NCAR and NOAA working on this? The IPCC was created by bureaucrats with a vested financial and political interest to use the scientific community to build a case to regulate oil companies and control energy, in hopes they could convince the public that consumption of coal, oil and natural gas were causing harmful anthropogenic climate change. Climate change became the Goldilocks issue to move that agenda along, as it would otherwise have little support. Dr. Judith Curry (Judith Curry) explains this in her interview with John Stossel from October. 🎙️ Here’s a snippet. ✂️ 𝗗𝗿. 𝗝𝘂𝗱𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝗖𝘂𝗿𝗿𝘆: “. . . The origins go back to the 1980s, and the U.N. environmental program had this big environmental agenda, anti-capitalism. They hated the oil companies and they seized on the climate change issue as one to move their policies along. . . the policy cart was way out in front of the scientific horse from the very beginning. So, the IPCC’s mandate was to look for dangerous human-caused climate change. The IPCC wasn’t supposed to focus on any benefits of warming. They weren’t supposed to focus on natural climate variability. They were just supposed to look for the signal of dangerous human-caused climate change.” 🔗 You can watch the full interview here:
1:09

The United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change ( IPCC) was not created by a group of scientists in the late-1980s with the intention of studying both natural and man-made impacts on the global climate system. That did not happen. Period. Why would the IPCC be needed on the scientific front when there were already government agencies like the BoM, Met Office, NASA, NCAR and NOAA working on this? The IPCC was created by bureaucrats with a vested financial and political interest to use the scientific community to build a case to regulate oil companies and control energy, in hopes they could convince the public that consumption of coal, oil and natural gas were causing harmful anthropogenic climate change. Climate change became the Goldilocks issue to move that agenda along, as it would otherwise have little support. Dr. Judith Curry (Judith Curry) explains this in her interview with John Stossel from October. 🎙️ Here’s a snippet. ✂️ 𝗗𝗿. 𝗝𝘂𝗱𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝗖𝘂𝗿𝗿𝘆: “. . . The origins go back to the 1980s, and the U.N. environmental program had this big environmental agenda, anti-capitalism. They hated the oil companies and they seized on the climate change issue as one to move their policies along. . . the policy cart was way out in front of the scientific horse from the very beginning. So, the IPCC’s mandate was to look for dangerous human-caused climate change. The IPCC wasn’t supposed to focus on any benefits of warming. They weren’t supposed to focus on natural climate variability. They were just supposed to look for the signal of dangerous human-caused climate change.” 🔗 You can watch the full interview here:

Chris Martz

88,087 次观看 • 2 年前

In Avatar (2009), most water scenes were shot dry on a soundstage using the dry for wet method. The water was added later with — CGI. What’s crazy is the actors had to improvise their movements and reactions to make it feel like they were actually underwater.
0:20

In Avatar (2009), most water scenes were shot dry on a soundstage using the dry for wet method. The water was added later with — CGI. What’s crazy is the actors had to improvise their movements and reactions to make it feel like they were actually underwater.

Movie Moments Analyst

593,462 次观看 • 9 个月前

This is brilliant! Dana Pena schools a climate alarmist. If sea levels were truly to rise even 10ft that would put large parts of the world including the UK and the southern part of the US under water. Yet no property investment prospects highlight any risk of global warming. If it were really true banks wouldn’t invest. ‘It’s the greatest fraud that’s been perpetuated on mankind this century.’ 💥🔥💥
3:00

This is brilliant! Dana Pena schools a climate alarmist. If sea levels were truly to rise even 10ft that would put large parts of the world including the UK and the southern part of the US under water. Yet no property investment prospects highlight any risk of global warming. If it were really true banks wouldn’t invest. ‘It’s the greatest fraud that’s been perpetuated on mankind this century.’ 💥🔥💥

Kat A 🌸

133,250 次观看 • 11 个月前

The Artemis II crew reported seeing multiple impact flashes on the Moon. Astronauts described a bit of giddiness in the cabin after spotting at least four quick flashes on the near side of the Moon, mostly on or south of the equator. They confirmed the flashes were real meteor impacts, not sun glint from the spacecraft. Mission control mentioned to the crew that citizen scientists on Earth were also watching for the same flashes, and the crew’s observations on the near side mean ground observers likely saw them too. Source: CSPAN
2:00

The Artemis II crew reported seeing multiple impact flashes on the Moon. Astronauts described a bit of giddiness in the cabin after spotting at least four quick flashes on the near side of the Moon, mostly on or south of the equator. They confirmed the flashes were real meteor impacts, not sun glint from the spacecraft. Mission control mentioned to the crew that citizen scientists on Earth were also watching for the same flashes, and the crew’s observations on the near side mean ground observers likely saw them too. Source: CSPAN

Mario Nawfal

928,503 次观看 • 5 个月前

Candace Owens spoke with the family of Charlie Kirk’s assassin Tyler Robinson’s boyfriend In the days before the assassination, there were so many unknown cars out front of the assassins house the people who lived in the neighborhood couldn’t find parking “There was some unusual traffic. A lot of cars that were seen outside leading up to the shooting in the days before the shooting or the week before the shooting.” “Leading up to the shooting, that there were unusual, unusual traffic in the driveway where Tyler Robinson and Lance lived. Cars that were not recognized in the neighborhood. This was not a couple that hosted people. It wasn't like they were expecting them to have parties. And so other people are saying that that is something that struck them as odd. But there were apparently lots of different license plates and it therefore caused a little neighborhood, you know, kerfuffle, because other people were not able to park their cars because there were so many people that were at this house” “We're hearing, there's more people involved.”
2:57

Candace Owens spoke with the family of Charlie Kirk’s assassin Tyler Robinson’s boyfriend In the days before the assassination, there were so many unknown cars out front of the assassins house the people who lived in the neighborhood couldn’t find parking “There was some unusual traffic. A lot of cars that were seen outside leading up to the shooting in the days before the shooting or the week before the shooting.” “Leading up to the shooting, that there were unusual, unusual traffic in the driveway where Tyler Robinson and Lance lived. Cars that were not recognized in the neighborhood. This was not a couple that hosted people. It wasn't like they were expecting them to have parties. And so other people are saying that that is something that struck them as odd. But there were apparently lots of different license plates and it therefore caused a little neighborhood, you know, kerfuffle, because other people were not able to park their cars because there were so many people that were at this house” “We're hearing, there's more people involved.”

Wall Street Apes

456,879 次观看 • 1 年前