Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

In the early 2000s, climate models projected warming, but the actual observations did not follow. The response to this discrepancy was not to revisit the models, it was to revisit the measurements. So... More weather stations were added in the Arctic, the fastest warming region on earth, increasing its... influence on the global average. Large areas with sparse measurements were filled using estimates. Stations in regions showing cooling, including parts of South America, were removed or down-weighted. Sea surface temperatures were also reprocessed: older ship readings were adjusted cooler, with recent buoy data blended warmer. Homogenization algorithms lowered earlier temperatures and raised later ones, further steepening the trend. The models stayed fixed. The observations were adjusted to match them. Climate scientists reversed the scientific method.show more

Electroverse

35,383 subscribers

51,675 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & Politik Bildung Wissenschaft & Technologie

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Australia's Bureau of Meteorology has been audited station by station. The report reveals that the agency has systematically erased cooling trends from the historical record, replacing them with synthetic warming. At Rutherglen, Victoria for example, raw data from 1913 to 2006 showed a cooling trend. But the Bureau's adjusted chart flips this into warming. No physical justification, just statistical sleight of hand. Comparisons at Deniliquin also reveals the tactic - how past highs have been lowered to fit the narrative. Minimums from 1910 onward here are reduced by as much as 1.8C. These edits weren't based on new evidence. They were applied decades later by opaque homogenization models. The report's author calls it the rewriting of Australia's temperature history. But it's not just happening in Australia. Climate agencies in the UK and US have also cooled the past so as to exaggerate or even fabricate modern warming trends. This manipulated data is then paraded as truth by politicians and the media with the original measurements buried.

Australia's Bureau of Meteorology has been audited station by station. The report reveals that the agency has systematically erased cooling trends from the historical record, replacing them with synthetic warming. At Rutherglen, Victoria for example, raw data from 1913 to 2006 showed a cooling trend. But the Bureau's adjusted chart flips this into warming. No physical justification, just statistical sleight of hand. Comparisons at Deniliquin also reveals the tactic - how past highs have been lowered to fit the narrative. Minimums from 1910 onward here are reduced by as much as 1.8C. These edits weren't based on new evidence. They were applied decades later by opaque homogenization models. The report's author calls it the rewriting of Australia's temperature history. But it's not just happening in Australia. Climate agencies in the UK and US have also cooled the past so as to exaggerate or even fabricate modern warming trends. This manipulated data is then paraded as truth by politicians and the media with the original measurements buried.

Electroverse

244,005 Aufrufe • vor 10 Tagen

Greenland Temperature Study Challenges Climate Narratives: The Data Speaks | Climate Conservative Consumer Recent analysis of MODIS satellite data (2000–2019) reveals Greenland’s surface temperatures remained remarkably stable, challenging narratives of rapid Arctic warming. The study, covering 31,464 observations across 36 sub-regions, found minimal long-term trends—only a slight cooling of ~0.05°C per decade, with three of four regions showing no significant change and the South region cooling slightly. This contrasts with expectations of accelerated warming, though seasonal patterns remained consistent. The findings suggest factors beyond surface temperature, such as ocean currents or ice dynamics, may drive observed ice sheet changes. Ice-free areas showed higher average temperatures than ice-covered regions but neither displayed significant warming, challenging assumptions that ice-free regions would warm faster. The study aligns with other research indicating slowed warming since the 1990s, complicating climate model assumptions. While MODIS data has limitations (e.g., cloud cover), the results highlight complex Arctic climate dynamics, urging reevaluation of ice melt drivers and their implications for sea level projections. The analysis divided Greenland into four primary regions (North, Central-North, Central-South, South), each with nine sub-regions, using statistical methods to isolate long-term trends from seasonal variability. These results underscore the need for honest integration of such findings into climate science discourse, emphasizing the complexity of Arctic climate dynamics and demanding reassessment of current climate models. Read more:

Greenland Temperature Study Challenges Climate Narratives: The Data Speaks | Climate Conservative Consumer Recent analysis of MODIS satellite data (2000–2019) reveals Greenland’s surface temperatures remained remarkably stable, challenging narratives of rapid Arctic warming. The study, covering 31,464 observations across 36 sub-regions, found minimal long-term trends—only a slight cooling of ~0.05°C per decade, with three of four regions showing no significant change and the South region cooling slightly. This contrasts with expectations of accelerated warming, though seasonal patterns remained consistent. The findings suggest factors beyond surface temperature, such as ocean currents or ice dynamics, may drive observed ice sheet changes. Ice-free areas showed higher average temperatures than ice-covered regions but neither displayed significant warming, challenging assumptions that ice-free regions would warm faster. The study aligns with other research indicating slowed warming since the 1990s, complicating climate model assumptions. While MODIS data has limitations (e.g., cloud cover), the results highlight complex Arctic climate dynamics, urging reevaluation of ice melt drivers and their implications for sea level projections. The analysis divided Greenland into four primary regions (North, Central-North, Central-South, South), each with nine sub-regions, using statistical methods to isolate long-term trends from seasonal variability. These results underscore the need for honest integration of such findings into climate science discourse, emphasizing the complexity of Arctic climate dynamics and demanding reassessment of current climate models. Read more:

Owen Gregorian

129,879 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

The UK Met Office has again been caught publishing temperatures from weather stations that don't exist. An FOI revealed Lowestoft closed in 2010, yet the Met Office kept issuing official temperatures for it. The office said they were using well-correlated neighboring stations, but the FOI revealed that this was a lie. The numbers were actually coming from a model that was inventing data from 'phantom' neighboring stations. When exposed, the office quietly deleted years of readings for Lowestoft, as well as a number of other stations, and added a disclaimer saying their data is "for general interest only." FOIs also show over one third of Met Office stations never existed, and that real high-quality sites like Colwood are ignored. Also, more than 80% of the network is low-grade class 4 or 5, by WMO standards, giving 2-5C uncertainty. This is the foundation of the UK's climate record – closed stations, imaginary stations and synthetic temperatures. The Met Office isn't credible.

The UK Met Office has again been caught publishing temperatures from weather stations that don't exist. An FOI revealed Lowestoft closed in 2010, yet the Met Office kept issuing official temperatures for it. The office said they were using well-correlated neighboring stations, but the FOI revealed that this was a lie. The numbers were actually coming from a model that was inventing data from 'phantom' neighboring stations. When exposed, the office quietly deleted years of readings for Lowestoft, as well as a number of other stations, and added a disclaimer saying their data is "for general interest only." FOIs also show over one third of Met Office stations never existed, and that real high-quality sites like Colwood are ignored. Also, more than 80% of the network is low-grade class 4 or 5, by WMO standards, giving 2-5C uncertainty. This is the foundation of the UK's climate record – closed stations, imaginary stations and synthetic temperatures. The Met Office isn't credible.

Electroverse

39,951 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Canada is not warming at twice the global average, as claimed. A report by data scientist Joseph Hickey examined Canada's official temperature records. It found a sudden nationwide 1C jump in 1998. The same year, 72 new stations were added. The increase was simultaneous across the country. But the climate doesn't behave like that. These step changes are what's known as measurement artifacts, typically caused by station moves or instrument changes. Remove the artificial jump, and Canada's supposed warming over the past seven decades largely disappears. Also, the official ECCC dataset contains more than 10,000 cases where daily minimum temperatures exceed maximums. A physical impossibility, of course. Canada's climate policy rests on this data. Correct it, and the government's core warming claim collapses.

Canada is not warming at twice the global average, as claimed. A report by data scientist Joseph Hickey examined Canada's official temperature records. It found a sudden nationwide 1C jump in 1998. The same year, 72 new stations were added. The increase was simultaneous across the country. But the climate doesn't behave like that. These step changes are what's known as measurement artifacts, typically caused by station moves or instrument changes. Remove the artificial jump, and Canada's supposed warming over the past seven decades largely disappears. Also, the official ECCC dataset contains more than 10,000 cases where daily minimum temperatures exceed maximums. A physical impossibility, of course. Canada's climate policy rests on this data. Correct it, and the government's core warming claim collapses.

Electroverse

12,633 Aufrufe • vor 17 Tagen

In 2016, the Netherlands Meteorological Institute adjusted temperatures at De Bilt - the country's main climate station. Daily maximums from 1901 to 1950 were lowered by up to 1.9C, which removed 16 of 23 heatwaves from the record. The altered data were then used to claim modern heatwaves were unprecedented. Four researchers challenged the changes. But the institute dismissed the criticism. So the analysis went to peer review. In 2021, it was published, conclusively demonstrating the method systematically erased historical heat extremes. Today, the Meteorological Institute has quietly changed its approach, and as a result, seven erased heatwaves have been restored. Here again, we have a government agency caught rewriting climate history. The Netherlands Meteorological Institute erased heatwaves of the past, ignored critics, and reinstated the truth only when the evidence became impossible to ignore. Policies were built on that manipulated record. Dutch farmers lost livelihoods. Industry and the wider economy paid the price. But accountability is coming...

In 2016, the Netherlands Meteorological Institute adjusted temperatures at De Bilt - the country's main climate station. Daily maximums from 1901 to 1950 were lowered by up to 1.9C, which removed 16 of 23 heatwaves from the record. The altered data were then used to claim modern heatwaves were unprecedented. Four researchers challenged the changes. But the institute dismissed the criticism. So the analysis went to peer review. In 2021, it was published, conclusively demonstrating the method systematically erased historical heat extremes. Today, the Meteorological Institute has quietly changed its approach, and as a result, seven erased heatwaves have been restored. Here again, we have a government agency caught rewriting climate history. The Netherlands Meteorological Institute erased heatwaves of the past, ignored critics, and reinstated the truth only when the evidence became impossible to ignore. Policies were built on that manipulated record. Dutch farmers lost livelihoods. Industry and the wider economy paid the price. But accountability is coming...

Electroverse

472,731 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Canada is NOT warming at twice the global average, as claimed by ECCC. A report by data scientist Joseph Hickey examined Canada's official temperature records. It found a sudden nationwide +1C jump in 1998 - the same year 72 new stations were added. The increase was simultaneous across the country. But the climate doesn't behave like that. These step changes are what's known as 'measurement artifacts', typically caused by station moves or instrument changes. Remove the artificial jump, and Canada's warming over the past seven decades largely disappears. Also, the official ECCC dataset contains more than 10,000 cases where daily 'minimum' temperatures exceed 'maximums' - a physical impossibility. Canada's climate policy rests on this data. Correct it, and the government's core warming claim collapses.

Canada is NOT warming at twice the global average, as claimed by ECCC. A report by data scientist Joseph Hickey examined Canada's official temperature records. It found a sudden nationwide +1C jump in 1998 - the same year 72 new stations were added. The increase was simultaneous across the country. But the climate doesn't behave like that. These step changes are what's known as 'measurement artifacts', typically caused by station moves or instrument changes. Remove the artificial jump, and Canada's warming over the past seven decades largely disappears. Also, the official ECCC dataset contains more than 10,000 cases where daily 'minimum' temperatures exceed 'maximums' - a physical impossibility. Canada's climate policy rests on this data. Correct it, and the government's core warming claim collapses.

Electroverse

15,641 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Scientists Keston Green and Willie Soon found that the UN's climate models simply don't work. "IPCC climate models lack predictive validity and cannot guide policy," say the researchers. When tested on real forecasts instead of theory, the CO2-based models failed, often performing worse than just a random guess. Whereas simple models based solely on solar activity worked far better, even decades out. The whole climate crisis depends on these models, not on actual measurements, but many run as much as 5C too hot. The IPCC was never about testing if man-made warming is actually real. It was built to promote the idea that it was real.

Scientists Keston Green and Willie Soon found that the UN's climate models simply don't work. "IPCC climate models lack predictive validity and cannot guide policy," say the researchers. When tested on real forecasts instead of theory, the CO2-based models failed, often performing worse than just a random guess. Whereas simple models based solely on solar activity worked far better, even decades out. The whole climate crisis depends on these models, not on actual measurements, but many run as much as 5C too hot. The IPCC was never about testing if man-made warming is actually real. It was built to promote the idea that it was real.

Electroverse

16,565 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

The global mean surface temperature today is only about 1C warmer than it was in 1880. This modest rise has been framed as a 'climate emergency,' yet in historical context it is trivial. Global temperatures have fluctuated by more than 10C over natural glacial cycles long before industrialization. Even during the Holocene, recent periods such as the Medieval Warm Period were far warmer than today without triggering catastrophe. The data show no runaway warming or planetary collapse. In fact, historical records reveal warmth is beneficial to humanity and to life in general. This disconnect between reality and the apocalyptic rhetoric exposes the ruse. There is no "climate crisis."

The global mean surface temperature today is only about 1C warmer than it was in 1880. This modest rise has been framed as a 'climate emergency,' yet in historical context it is trivial. Global temperatures have fluctuated by more than 10C over natural glacial cycles long before industrialization. Even during the Holocene, recent periods such as the Medieval Warm Period were far warmer than today without triggering catastrophe. The data show no runaway warming or planetary collapse. In fact, historical records reveal warmth is beneficial to humanity and to life in general. This disconnect between reality and the apocalyptic rhetoric exposes the ruse. There is no "climate crisis."

Electroverse

31,324 Aufrufe • vor 8 Tagen

We are seeing a lot of confusion about "Body to Body", so just to clear things up: Yoongi and Namjoon were not against using the Arirang sample. What they had concerns about was how it was layered in the track. In the earlier version, the sample was much louder and overlapped with the vocals, which made it overwhelming for listeners. The final version we got is different, with the sample more subtly blended into the background. So, to be clear, they were not against the Arirang sample itself. The version we hear today reflects adjustments made after those initial concerns were raised.

We are seeing a lot of confusion about "Body to Body", so just to clear things up: Yoongi and Namjoon were not against using the Arirang sample. What they had concerns about was how it was layered in the track. In the earlier version, the sample was much louder and overlapped with the vocals, which made it overwhelming for listeners. The final version we got is different, with the sample more subtly blended into the background. So, to be clear, they were not against the Arirang sample itself. The version we hear today reflects adjustments made after those initial concerns were raised.

AGUST D CHARTS

243,378 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

"The climate crisis is a health crisis—not in the future, but now." Tedros at the UN's COP30 climate summit. "Healthy people depend on a healthy planet. If our planet were a patient, it would be admitted to intensive care." "It's running a high fever, with the average global temperatures increasing year after year. Its lung capacity is compromised with the destruction of forests that absorb carbon dioxide and produce oxygen." And yet, in order to ease traffic to COP30, tens of thousands of acres of protected Amazon rainforest were bulldozed to make way for a new four-lane highway. 🤡

"The climate crisis is a health crisis—not in the future, but now." Tedros at the UN's COP30 climate summit. "Healthy people depend on a healthy planet. If our planet were a patient, it would be admitted to intensive care." "It's running a high fever, with the average global temperatures increasing year after year. Its lung capacity is compromised with the destruction of forests that absorb carbon dioxide and produce oxygen." And yet, in order to ease traffic to COP30, tens of thousands of acres of protected Amazon rainforest were bulldozed to make way for a new four-lane highway. 🤡

Wide Awake Media

31,652 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Australian Dr Kesten Green has shocked the scientific world with a recent study stating the UN IPCC Climate forecasts are not based on science. The IPCC models suggesting human carbon emissions have an impact were out by 22 degrees. Whereas the solar model used by Dr Green was very predictive of future temperatures. Within one degree. Thus they concluded the IPCC models don’t support the hypothesis that human carbon emissions have a meaningful impact on global temperatures!! Net Zero is done.

Australian Dr Kesten Green has shocked the scientific world with a recent study stating the UN IPCC Climate forecasts are not based on science. The IPCC models suggesting human carbon emissions have an impact were out by 22 degrees. Whereas the solar model used by Dr Green was very predictive of future temperatures. Within one degree. Thus they concluded the IPCC models don’t support the hypothesis that human carbon emissions have a meaningful impact on global temperatures!! Net Zero is done.

Kat A 🌸

20,144 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

During the 2020 Election votes on DOMINION voting machines were disappearing and appearing in the dead of night in CLARKE and FULTON COUNTY, Georgia. Logs stored on USB drives required by law were changed from the end of one vote count day, at close, to the next day, when the counting resumed the next day. When an audit was granted, a useless visual examination of ONLY the outside of the USB drives were allowed. No internal information on the USB drives were allowed to be accessed during the audit. This coincides with the recent information what also happened in Fulton county, GA, with their logs from election officials when election stations were opened and closed as well, which 315,000 votes were not authenticated because the chain of custody was broken. Hundreds of thousands of duplicate votes were also counted and a total of 364,000 ineligible voters were NOT cleaned off of the voter roles prior to the election, WHY? Because it was a cover-up. They knew EXACTLY what they were doing, and that was to steal the 2020 Election.

During the 2020 Election votes on DOMINION voting machines were disappearing and appearing in the dead of night in CLARKE and FULTON COUNTY, Georgia. Logs stored on USB drives required by law were changed from the end of one vote count day, at close, to the next day, when the counting resumed the next day. When an audit was granted, a useless visual examination of ONLY the outside of the USB drives were allowed. No internal information on the USB drives were allowed to be accessed during the audit. This coincides with the recent information what also happened in Fulton county, GA, with their logs from election officials when election stations were opened and closed as well, which 315,000 votes were not authenticated because the chain of custody was broken. Hundreds of thousands of duplicate votes were also counted and a total of 364,000 ineligible voters were NOT cleaned off of the voter roles prior to the election, WHY? Because it was a cover-up. They knew EXACTLY what they were doing, and that was to steal the 2020 Election.

The SCIF

79,077 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Putin in the city of Russian nuclear scientists: I won't go into details now, but many specialists who worked in Los Alamos, in the USA, they also collaborated with Russia. They were not trivial spies, in the literal sense of the word. They were not spies at all. They were simply smart people and understood that in order to protect humanity from the genie they were releasing from the bottle, it was necessary to create a balance. They did this, helping our scientists work.

Putin in the city of Russian nuclear scientists: I won't go into details now, but many specialists who worked in Los Alamos, in the USA, they also collaborated with Russia. They were not trivial spies, in the literal sense of the word. They were not spies at all. They were simply smart people and understood that in order to protect humanity from the genie they were releasing from the bottle, it was necessary to create a balance. They did this, helping our scientists work.

Victor vicktop55 commentary

60,254 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

In Avatar (2009), most water scenes were shot dry on a soundstage using the dry for wet method. The water was added later with — CGI. What’s crazy is the actors had to improvise their movements and reactions to make it feel like they were actually underwater.

Movie Moments Analyst

593,462 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

This is brilliant! Dana Pena schools a climate alarmist. If sea levels were truly to rise even 10ft that would put large parts of the world including the UK and the southern part of the US under water. Yet no property investment prospects highlight any risk of global warming. If it were really true banks wouldn’t invest. ‘It’s the greatest fraud that’s been perpetuated on mankind this century.’ 💥🔥💥

This is brilliant! Dana Pena schools a climate alarmist. If sea levels were truly to rise even 10ft that would put large parts of the world including the UK and the southern part of the US under water. Yet no property investment prospects highlight any risk of global warming. If it were really true banks wouldn’t invest. ‘It’s the greatest fraud that’s been perpetuated on mankind this century.’ 💥🔥💥

Kat A 🌸

132,739 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Sea Levels Not Surging Despite Years Of Climate Activists And Corporate Media Freaking Out, Study Finds | Audrey Streb, Daily Caller News Foundation One recent study compiling sea level rise data shows oceans are not surging as much as the scientific world previously projected and corporate media has repeatedly sounded the alarm over. The Journal of Marine Science and Engineering published the peer-reviewed study on Aug. 27, authored by Dutch engineering consultant Hessel G. Voortman and independent researcher Rob De Vos. The study concluded that the average rate of sea level rise in 2020 was well below other widely cited analyses, and that when projections were compared with local data, there was little evidence climate change was driving the acceleration seen in a few regions — a finding energy policy experts told the Daily Caller News Foundation challenges mainstream climate change orthodoxy. “Overall, this study indicates that in most places, sea levels are not rising unusually quickly. In the relatively few locations where sea levels are rising faster than average, the cause is almost certainly local factors such as land subsidence or ground compaction,” Sterling Burnett, director of the Arthur B. Robinson Center on Climate and Environmental Policy at The Heartland Institute, told the DCNF. “Global sea levels are currently rising more slowly than they have for much of the time since the last ice age ended — a period during which seas rose more than 400 feet. Any possible increase in the recent rate of rise compared with the past century is small, within the margin of error, and not outside historical patterns.” Though the report doesn’t account for sea level rise everywhere, Voortman told journalist Michael Shellenberger on Tuesday that he was surprised no one had compiled such a study before, noting it is the first to compare projections with recorded local data from the past century. The two data sets the researchers drew from did have some gaps, which meant that most sections in the world with usable data were in the Northern Hemisphere, with several of the “selected stations” spanning North America, Europe and Japan. Gaps in the data included regions around Australia, the northeast of Latin America, East Asia and most of Africa. “The average rate of sea level rise in 2020 is (only) around 1.5 mm/year (15 cm per century)” Voortman said Tuesday. “This is significantly lower than the 3 to 4 mm/year often reported by climate scientists in scientific literature and the media.” The report notes that in the data sets the researchers used, “approximately 95% of the suitable locations show no statistically significant acceleration of the rate of sea level rise,” and that regions that did see a spike in sea level likely “local, non-climatic phenomena are a plausible cause of the accelerated sea level rise observed at the remaining 5% of the suitable locations.” “It is crazy that it had not been done. … I started doing this research in 2021 by doing the literature review. ‘Who has done the comparison of the projections with the observations?’ And there were none,” Voortman said Tuesday. “I had to do a lot of programming and automate data imports and data management. I organized it by using databases so that I really knew what I was doing. It was very structured because I was dealing with 150,000 locations and, on average, 100 years of data. That made one and a half million lines of data. I found myself for days working on things that I felt, ‘This is more computer science than civil engineering.'” Steve Milloy, senior fellow at the Energy & Environment Legal Institute, told the DCNF that “there are a lot of additional factors that can affect tide gauge measurements including geological changes, groundwater withdrawal, and land use. But climate alarmists falsely chalk up all changes to polar ice melting caused by emissions-driven ‘global warming.'” A few other studies have been published of late that also challenge climate change hysteria, with one widely reported study showing that Arctic Sea ice melting has slowed in the last 20 years. Another recent report found that a 2024 climate change study — heavily cited by legacy media for projecting up to $38 trillion in global damages by 2050 — relied on inaccurate data.

Sea Levels Not Surging Despite Years Of Climate Activists And Corporate Media Freaking Out, Study Finds | Audrey Streb, Daily Caller News Foundation One recent study compiling sea level rise data shows oceans are not surging as much as the scientific world previously projected and corporate media has repeatedly sounded the alarm over. The Journal of Marine Science and Engineering published the peer-reviewed study on Aug. 27, authored by Dutch engineering consultant Hessel G. Voortman and independent researcher Rob De Vos. The study concluded that the average rate of sea level rise in 2020 was well below other widely cited analyses, and that when projections were compared with local data, there was little evidence climate change was driving the acceleration seen in a few regions — a finding energy policy experts told the Daily Caller News Foundation challenges mainstream climate change orthodoxy. “Overall, this study indicates that in most places, sea levels are not rising unusually quickly. In the relatively few locations where sea levels are rising faster than average, the cause is almost certainly local factors such as land subsidence or ground compaction,” Sterling Burnett, director of the Arthur B. Robinson Center on Climate and Environmental Policy at The Heartland Institute, told the DCNF. “Global sea levels are currently rising more slowly than they have for much of the time since the last ice age ended — a period during which seas rose more than 400 feet. Any possible increase in the recent rate of rise compared with the past century is small, within the margin of error, and not outside historical patterns.” Though the report doesn’t account for sea level rise everywhere, Voortman told journalist Michael Shellenberger on Tuesday that he was surprised no one had compiled such a study before, noting it is the first to compare projections with recorded local data from the past century. The two data sets the researchers drew from did have some gaps, which meant that most sections in the world with usable data were in the Northern Hemisphere, with several of the “selected stations” spanning North America, Europe and Japan. Gaps in the data included regions around Australia, the northeast of Latin America, East Asia and most of Africa. “The average rate of sea level rise in 2020 is (only) around 1.5 mm/year (15 cm per century)” Voortman said Tuesday. “This is significantly lower than the 3 to 4 mm/year often reported by climate scientists in scientific literature and the media.” The report notes that in the data sets the researchers used, “approximately 95% of the suitable locations show no statistically significant acceleration of the rate of sea level rise,” and that regions that did see a spike in sea level likely “local, non-climatic phenomena are a plausible cause of the accelerated sea level rise observed at the remaining 5% of the suitable locations.” “It is crazy that it had not been done. … I started doing this research in 2021 by doing the literature review. ‘Who has done the comparison of the projections with the observations?’ And there were none,” Voortman said Tuesday. “I had to do a lot of programming and automate data imports and data management. I organized it by using databases so that I really knew what I was doing. It was very structured because I was dealing with 150,000 locations and, on average, 100 years of data. That made one and a half million lines of data. I found myself for days working on things that I felt, ‘This is more computer science than civil engineering.'” Steve Milloy, senior fellow at the Energy & Environment Legal Institute, told the DCNF that “there are a lot of additional factors that can affect tide gauge measurements including geological changes, groundwater withdrawal, and land use. But climate alarmists falsely chalk up all changes to polar ice melting caused by emissions-driven ‘global warming.'” A few other studies have been published of late that also challenge climate change hysteria, with one widely reported study showing that Arctic Sea ice melting has slowed in the last 20 years. Another recent report found that a 2024 climate change study — heavily cited by legacy media for projecting up to $38 trillion in global damages by 2050 — relied on inaccurate data.

Owen Gregorian

105,142 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

The Artemis II crew reported seeing multiple impact flashes on the Moon. Astronauts described a bit of giddiness in the cabin after spotting at least four quick flashes on the near side of the Moon, mostly on or south of the equator. They confirmed the flashes were real meteor impacts, not sun glint from the spacecraft. Mission control mentioned to the crew that citizen scientists on Earth were also watching for the same flashes, and the crew’s observations on the near side mean ground observers likely saw them too. Source: CSPAN

The Artemis II crew reported seeing multiple impact flashes on the Moon. Astronauts described a bit of giddiness in the cabin after spotting at least four quick flashes on the near side of the Moon, mostly on or south of the equator. They confirmed the flashes were real meteor impacts, not sun glint from the spacecraft. Mission control mentioned to the crew that citizen scientists on Earth were also watching for the same flashes, and the crew’s observations on the near side mean ground observers likely saw them too. Source: CSPAN

Mario Nawfal

928,377 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Randomly did this music video with Fab when I was 19, the rest of the models were in their 30’s and some of them were mean as hell lmao. I had no idea I was gonna be the main girl in the video. He was tryna put me on and get me signed to the talent agency that booked the other models, but I told him I really just wanna make art. So he changed the video from pouring paint on my body, to me being drawn instead and I draw the last scene of the video.

Randomly did this music video with Fab when I was 19, the rest of the models were in their 30’s and some of them were mean as hell lmao. I had no idea I was gonna be the main girl in the video. He was tryna put me on and get me signed to the talent agency that booked the other models, but I told him I really just wanna make art. So he changed the video from pouring paint on my body, to me being drawn instead and I draw the last scene of the video.

EarthtoGazelle

33,836 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Michigan election workers were finding thousands of ballots and voters who weren't even in the poll books and had birthdays in the early 1900s at the TCF center during the Michigan 2020 election. Democrats were able to get Republican poll watchers kicked out by not telling them that they had to sign out when they left to come back in. Truckloads of ballots were being dumped early in the AM, Democrats were filmed wheeling in wagons and suitcases with ballots. People knew it was being stolen and were literally yelling "Stop The Count" so loud the building was shaking.

Michigan election workers were finding thousands of ballots and voters who weren't even in the poll books and had birthdays in the early 1900s at the TCF center during the Michigan 2020 election. Democrats were able to get Republican poll watchers kicked out by not telling them that they had to sign out when they left to come back in. Truckloads of ballots were being dumped early in the AM, Democrats were filmed wheeling in wagons and suitcases with ballots. People knew it was being stolen and were literally yelling "Stop The Count" so loud the building was shaking.

The SCIF

58,613 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Candace Owens spoke with the family of Charlie Kirk’s assassin Tyler Robinson’s boyfriend In the days before the assassination, there were so many unknown cars out front of the assassins house the people who lived in the neighborhood couldn’t find parking “There was some unusual traffic. A lot of cars that were seen outside leading up to the shooting in the days before the shooting or the week before the shooting.” “Leading up to the shooting, that there were unusual, unusual traffic in the driveway where Tyler Robinson and Lance lived. Cars that were not recognized in the neighborhood. This was not a couple that hosted people. It wasn't like they were expecting them to have parties. And so other people are saying that that is something that struck them as odd. But there were apparently lots of different license plates and it therefore caused a little neighborhood, you know, kerfuffle, because other people were not able to park their cars because there were so many people that were at this house” “We're hearing, there's more people involved.”

Candace Owens spoke with the family of Charlie Kirk’s assassin Tyler Robinson’s boyfriend In the days before the assassination, there were so many unknown cars out front of the assassins house the people who lived in the neighborhood couldn’t find parking “There was some unusual traffic. A lot of cars that were seen outside leading up to the shooting in the days before the shooting or the week before the shooting.” “Leading up to the shooting, that there were unusual, unusual traffic in the driveway where Tyler Robinson and Lance lived. Cars that were not recognized in the neighborhood. This was not a couple that hosted people. It wasn't like they were expecting them to have parties. And so other people are saying that that is something that struck them as odd. But there were apparently lots of different license plates and it therefore caused a little neighborhood, you know, kerfuffle, because other people were not able to park their cars because there were so many people that were at this house” “We're hearing, there's more people involved.”

Wall Street Apes

456,879 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten