Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Canada is not warming at twice the global average, as claimed. A report by data scientist Joseph Hickey examined Canada's official temperature records. It found a sudden nationwide 1C jump in 1998. The same year, 72 new stations were added. The increase was simultaneous across the country. But the...

Electroversenet's profile picture

Electroverse

47,662 subscribers

13,032 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Australia's Bureau of Meteorology has been audited station by station. The report reveals that the agency has systematically erased cooling trends from the historical record, replacing them with synthetic warming. At Rutherglen, Victoria for example, raw data from 1913 to 2006 showed a cooling trend. But the Bureau's adjusted chart flips this into warming. No physical justification, just statistical sleight of hand. Comparisons at Deniliquin also reveals the tactic - how past highs have been lowered to fit the narrative. Minimums from 1910 onward here are reduced by as much as 1.8C. These edits weren't based on new evidence. They were applied decades later by opaque homogenization models. The report's author calls it the rewriting of Australia's temperature history. But it's not just happening in Australia. Climate agencies in the UK and US have also cooled the past so as to exaggerate or even fabricate modern warming trends. This manipulated data is then paraded as truth by politicians and the media with the original measurements buried.
1:05

Australia's Bureau of Meteorology has been audited station by station. The report reveals that the agency has systematically erased cooling trends from the historical record, replacing them with synthetic warming. At Rutherglen, Victoria for example, raw data from 1913 to 2006 showed a cooling trend. But the Bureau's adjusted chart flips this into warming. No physical justification, just statistical sleight of hand. Comparisons at Deniliquin also reveals the tactic - how past highs have been lowered to fit the narrative. Minimums from 1910 onward here are reduced by as much as 1.8C. These edits weren't based on new evidence. They were applied decades later by opaque homogenization models. The report's author calls it the rewriting of Australia's temperature history. But it's not just happening in Australia. Climate agencies in the UK and US have also cooled the past so as to exaggerate or even fabricate modern warming trends. This manipulated data is then paraded as truth by politicians and the media with the original measurements buried.

Electroverse

287,224 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

THE SOLAR SYSTEM CAUSES CLIMATE CHANGES, CO2 FOLLOWS Ice core studies have proven that warming precedes rises in CO2, so we can deduce that warming causes CO2, and not the other way round as Al Gore claimed. This was a political agenda that skewed science. This happens because the Oceans absorb CO2 as they cool, and release it as they warm up. 96% of CO2 in the atmosphere is emitted naturally. 70% of CO2 in the atmosphere has a natural origin. The greenhouse gas effect is caused by water vapour by 80%. CO2 is not the cause of warming, but it's the effect, as proven by ice core studies.
6:40

THE SOLAR SYSTEM CAUSES CLIMATE CHANGES, CO2 FOLLOWS Ice core studies have proven that warming precedes rises in CO2, so we can deduce that warming causes CO2, and not the other way round as Al Gore claimed. This was a political agenda that skewed science. This happens because the Oceans absorb CO2 as they cool, and release it as they warm up. 96% of CO2 in the atmosphere is emitted naturally. 70% of CO2 in the atmosphere has a natural origin. The greenhouse gas effect is caused by water vapour by 80%. CO2 is not the cause of warming, but it's the effect, as proven by ice core studies.

Robin Monotti

44,083 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

The global mean surface temperature today is only about 1C warmer than it was in 1880. This modest rise has been framed as a 'climate emergency,' yet in historical context it is trivial. Global temperatures have fluctuated by more than 10C over natural glacial cycles long before industrialization. Even during the Holocene, recent periods such as the Medieval Warm Period were far warmer than today without triggering catastrophe. The data show no runaway warming or planetary collapse. In fact, historical records reveal warmth is beneficial to humanity and to life in general. This disconnect between reality and the apocalyptic rhetoric exposes the ruse. There is no "climate crisis."
0:42

The global mean surface temperature today is only about 1C warmer than it was in 1880. This modest rise has been framed as a 'climate emergency,' yet in historical context it is trivial. Global temperatures have fluctuated by more than 10C over natural glacial cycles long before industrialization. Even during the Holocene, recent periods such as the Medieval Warm Period were far warmer than today without triggering catastrophe. The data show no runaway warming or planetary collapse. In fact, historical records reveal warmth is beneficial to humanity and to life in general. This disconnect between reality and the apocalyptic rhetoric exposes the ruse. There is no "climate crisis."

Electroverse

32,204 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

In the early 2000s, climate models projected warming, but the actual observations did not follow. The response to this discrepancy was not to revisit the models, it was to revisit the measurements. So... More weather stations were added in the Arctic, the fastest warming region on earth, increasing its influence on the global average. Large areas with sparse measurements were filled using estimates. Stations in regions showing cooling, including parts of South America, were removed or down-weighted. Sea surface temperatures were also reprocessed: older ship readings were adjusted cooler, with recent buoy data blended warmer. Homogenization algorithms lowered earlier temperatures and raised later ones, further steepening the trend. The models stayed fixed. The observations were adjusted to match them. Climate scientists reversed the scientific method.
0:49

In the early 2000s, climate models projected warming, but the actual observations did not follow. The response to this discrepancy was not to revisit the models, it was to revisit the measurements. So... More weather stations were added in the Arctic, the fastest warming region on earth, increasing its influence on the global average. Large areas with sparse measurements were filled using estimates. Stations in regions showing cooling, including parts of South America, were removed or down-weighted. Sea surface temperatures were also reprocessed: older ship readings were adjusted cooler, with recent buoy data blended warmer. Homogenization algorithms lowered earlier temperatures and raised later ones, further steepening the trend. The models stayed fixed. The observations were adjusted to match them. Climate scientists reversed the scientific method.

Electroverse

52,305 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

A new study analyzed daily temperatures from 992 long-running weather stations across 29 countries covering the years 1899 to 2024. Then it compared those temperatures to cumulative human CO2 emissions. They don't match. From 1899 to 1940, the planet warmed at a rate of 0.022 C per year, even though emissions were low. Then from 1941 to 1982, temperatures cooled, despite CO2 emissions more than tripling. From 1983 to 2024, warming returned, but slower than before, at a rate of 0.017 C per year, even as emissions rose 8.6 times higher than during the earlier warming phase. As the author conclude: "These findings challenge the conventional assumption that human-induced CO2 is the primary driver of global warming." This is because the strongest warming occurred before major modern emissions kicked in, and later periods with far more CO2 show weaker warming, or even cooling. Earth's climate is still governed by natural variability.
0:57

A new study analyzed daily temperatures from 992 long-running weather stations across 29 countries covering the years 1899 to 2024. Then it compared those temperatures to cumulative human CO2 emissions. They don't match. From 1899 to 1940, the planet warmed at a rate of 0.022 C per year, even though emissions were low. Then from 1941 to 1982, temperatures cooled, despite CO2 emissions more than tripling. From 1983 to 2024, warming returned, but slower than before, at a rate of 0.017 C per year, even as emissions rose 8.6 times higher than during the earlier warming phase. As the author conclude: "These findings challenge the conventional assumption that human-induced CO2 is the primary driver of global warming." This is because the strongest warming occurred before major modern emissions kicked in, and later periods with far more CO2 show weaker warming, or even cooling. Earth's climate is still governed by natural variability.

Electroverse

32,924 görüntüleme • 15 gün önce

Today's warming is not unusual. A new study using Antarctic ice core data reveals the roughly 1.1C warming of the past century is not unusual in Earth's climate history. The research analyzes temperatures preserved in ice cores stretching back hundreds of thousands of years. Looking at the last 20,000 years, the study finds that 16% of all centuries warmed by at least 1.1C. In other words, roughly one out of every six centuries warmed as much, or more, as the past hundred years. Also, the ice core records show temperatures rising about 12C since the last ice age, with the last interglacial period around 125,000 years ago several degrees warmer than today. The modern 1.1C century scale increase falls well within natural variability. There is nothing alarming or unprecedented or even rare occurring with Earth's climate.
0:50

Today's warming is not unusual. A new study using Antarctic ice core data reveals the roughly 1.1C warming of the past century is not unusual in Earth's climate history. The research analyzes temperatures preserved in ice cores stretching back hundreds of thousands of years. Looking at the last 20,000 years, the study finds that 16% of all centuries warmed by at least 1.1C. In other words, roughly one out of every six centuries warmed as much, or more, as the past hundred years. Also, the ice core records show temperatures rising about 12C since the last ice age, with the last interglacial period around 125,000 years ago several degrees warmer than today. The modern 1.1C century scale increase falls well within natural variability. There is nothing alarming or unprecedented or even rare occurring with Earth's climate.

Electroverse

17,876 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

The Guardian claims ocean warming is causing a 'staggering' collapse in marine life, but the study it cites actually shows the opposite. When a year is warmer, fish biomass is found to increase - by as much as 24%. When years turn colder, biomass falls - by around 15%. That is the observed data. To preserve the climate narrative, however, the authors then abandon real year-to-year results and switch to a modeled decadal trend. The model assigns warming a negative effect and reports a decline. That decline is not observed. It is modeled. The authors go on to admit they cannot separate temperature effects from overfishing, which is the primary, well-known driver of fish declines worldwide. Since fishing pressure is not included, the model loads losses onto temperature by default. Even though, as per the study's own data, warmer years mean more fish. The collapse exists only in the model. And the headlines.
0:50

The Guardian claims ocean warming is causing a 'staggering' collapse in marine life, but the study it cites actually shows the opposite. When a year is warmer, fish biomass is found to increase - by as much as 24%. When years turn colder, biomass falls - by around 15%. That is the observed data. To preserve the climate narrative, however, the authors then abandon real year-to-year results and switch to a modeled decadal trend. The model assigns warming a negative effect and reports a decline. That decline is not observed. It is modeled. The authors go on to admit they cannot separate temperature effects from overfishing, which is the primary, well-known driver of fish declines worldwide. Since fishing pressure is not included, the model loads losses onto temperature by default. Even though, as per the study's own data, warmer years mean more fish. The collapse exists only in the model. And the headlines.

Electroverse

13,304 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

The UK Met Office has again been caught publishing temperatures from weather stations that don't exist. An FOI revealed Lowestoft closed in 2010, yet the Met Office kept issuing official temperatures for it. The office said they were using "well-correlated" neighboring stations, but the FOI revealed that this was a lie. The numbers were actually coming from a model that was inventing data from 'phantom' neighboring stations. When exposed, they quietly deleted years of readings for Lowestoft, as well as a number of other stations, and added a disclaimer saying their data is "for general interest only." FOIs also show over one third of Met Office stations never existed, and that real high-quality sites like Colwood are ignored. Also, more than 80% of the network is low-grade class 4 or 5, by WMO standards giving 2-5C uncertainty. This is the foundation of the UK's climate record – closed stations, imaginary stations and synthetic temperatures. The Met Office isn't credible.
0:57

The UK Met Office has again been caught publishing temperatures from weather stations that don't exist. An FOI revealed Lowestoft closed in 2010, yet the Met Office kept issuing official temperatures for it. The office said they were using "well-correlated" neighboring stations, but the FOI revealed that this was a lie. The numbers were actually coming from a model that was inventing data from 'phantom' neighboring stations. When exposed, they quietly deleted years of readings for Lowestoft, as well as a number of other stations, and added a disclaimer saying their data is "for general interest only." FOIs also show over one third of Met Office stations never existed, and that real high-quality sites like Colwood are ignored. Also, more than 80% of the network is low-grade class 4 or 5, by WMO standards giving 2-5C uncertainty. This is the foundation of the UK's climate record – closed stations, imaginary stations and synthetic temperatures. The Met Office isn't credible.

Electroverse

101,431 görüntüleme • 29 gün önce

THE CORRELATION OF TEMPERATURE TO CO2 IS THE OPPOSITE OF WHAT WE ARE TOLD: TEMPERATURE CHANGE LEADS TO CO2 CHANGE, NOT VICEVERSA: CO2 lags earth temperature changes by 800 years, not the other way round. The CO2 causing Climate Change narrative is a hoax, climate change causes CO2 change instead, because it is emitted by the ocean, which acts as a temperature dependent carbon sink. SCIENTIFIC PROOF CO2 IS NOT THE CAUSE OF CLIMATE CHANGE Timing of Atmospheric CO2 and Antarctic Temperature Changes Across Termination III | Science "We have measured the isotopic composition of argon in air bubbles in the Vostok core during Termination III (∼240,000 years before the present). This record most likely reflects the temperature and accumulation change, although the mechanism remains unclear. The sequence of events during Termination III suggests that the CO2 increase lagged Antarctic deglacial warming by 800 ± 200 years and preceded the Northern Hemisphere deglaciation."
2:19

THE CORRELATION OF TEMPERATURE TO CO2 IS THE OPPOSITE OF WHAT WE ARE TOLD: TEMPERATURE CHANGE LEADS TO CO2 CHANGE, NOT VICEVERSA: CO2 lags earth temperature changes by 800 years, not the other way round. The CO2 causing Climate Change narrative is a hoax, climate change causes CO2 change instead, because it is emitted by the ocean, which acts as a temperature dependent carbon sink. SCIENTIFIC PROOF CO2 IS NOT THE CAUSE OF CLIMATE CHANGE Timing of Atmospheric CO2 and Antarctic Temperature Changes Across Termination III | Science "We have measured the isotopic composition of argon in air bubbles in the Vostok core during Termination III (∼240,000 years before the present). This record most likely reflects the temperature and accumulation change, although the mechanism remains unclear. The sequence of events during Termination III suggests that the CO2 increase lagged Antarctic deglacial warming by 800 ± 200 years and preceded the Northern Hemisphere deglaciation."

Robin Monotti

112,747 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

The UN says 99% of coral reefs will vanish with just 2C of warming, but this claim collapses the moment you look at a map. Coral reefs are concentrated in the warmest waters on Earth because they need heat and sunlight to survive. If warmth killed coral, the Indo-Pacific and Caribbean would be barren. But they're not. They're instead the global hotspots of reef diversity. And as for the Great Barrier Reef (the world's most politicized reef), it has posted record coral cover over the past four years, directly contradicting decades of climate doom. As always, the "crisis narrative" collapses the moment you stop to take a look at the actual data.
0:35

The UN says 99% of coral reefs will vanish with just 2C of warming, but this claim collapses the moment you look at a map. Coral reefs are concentrated in the warmest waters on Earth because they need heat and sunlight to survive. If warmth killed coral, the Indo-Pacific and Caribbean would be barren. But they're not. They're instead the global hotspots of reef diversity. And as for the Great Barrier Reef (the world's most politicized reef), it has posted record coral cover over the past four years, directly contradicting decades of climate doom. As always, the "crisis narrative" collapses the moment you stop to take a look at the actual data.

Electroverse

19,569 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

From 1900 to 1970, land and sea temperatures rose almost identically. But after 1970, land readings shot up while the oceans warmed only slightly. The reason isn't a sudden "climatic change," but a measurement one. As the global population doubled, cities sprawled and weather stations once surrounded by open fields were swallowed by concrete, asphalt and traffic. This creates what's known as the 'urban heat island effect.' Cities trap heat during the day and release it slowly at night, keeping local temperatures artificially higher than the surrounding countryside. That extra warmth shows up in the records, pushing land data upward. The oceans, of course, have remained unaffected by city sprawl, and they show a more gentle, gradual rise. It isn't CO2, it's concrete.
0:46

From 1900 to 1970, land and sea temperatures rose almost identically. But after 1970, land readings shot up while the oceans warmed only slightly. The reason isn't a sudden "climatic change," but a measurement one. As the global population doubled, cities sprawled and weather stations once surrounded by open fields were swallowed by concrete, asphalt and traffic. This creates what's known as the 'urban heat island effect.' Cities trap heat during the day and release it slowly at night, keeping local temperatures artificially higher than the surrounding countryside. That extra warmth shows up in the records, pushing land data upward. The oceans, of course, have remained unaffected by city sprawl, and they show a more gentle, gradual rise. It isn't CO2, it's concrete.

Electroverse

16,032 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

MUST-WATCH: Contrary to propaganda spouted by climate alarmists, rising temperatures are the CAUSE of increased atmospheric CO2, not the other way around, and the temperature of the Earth is regulated by solar activity. The climate has always changed, long before humans got here, and it will continue to change long after we're gone, but globalist bodies like the UN and WEF want us to believe that humans are causing it, as a pretext to exert absolute totalitarian control over the entire planet. From the documentary, ‘The Great Global Warming Swindle’. Watch the full documentary here: For more content like this, visit: #ClimateScam #NetZero
6:41

MUST-WATCH: Contrary to propaganda spouted by climate alarmists, rising temperatures are the CAUSE of increased atmospheric CO2, not the other way around, and the temperature of the Earth is regulated by solar activity. The climate has always changed, long before humans got here, and it will continue to change long after we're gone, but globalist bodies like the UN and WEF want us to believe that humans are causing it, as a pretext to exert absolute totalitarian control over the entire planet. From the documentary, ‘The Great Global Warming Swindle’. Watch the full documentary here: For more content like this, visit: #ClimateScam #NetZero

Wide Awake Media

740,320 görüntüleme • 3 yıl önce

President Trump: "In 1982, the executive director of the United Nations Environmental Program predicted that by the year 2000 climate change would cause a global catastrophe. He said that it will be irreversible as any nuclear holocaust would be. This is what they said at the United Nations." "What happened? Here we are. Another UN official stated in 1989 that within a decade entire nations could be wiped off the map. By global warming. Not happening." "You know, it used to be global cooling. If you look back years ago in the 1920s and the 1930s they said global cooling will kill the world. We have to do something. Then they said global warming will kill the world. But then it started getting cooler." "So now they could just call it climate change because that way they can't miss. It's climate change. Because if it goes higher or lower, whatever the hell happens, there's climate change." "It's the greatest con job ever perpetrated on the world, in my opinion. Climate change, no matter what happens, you're involved in that. No more global warming." "No more global cooling. All of these predictions made by the United Nations and many others, often for bad reasons, were wrong. They were made by stupid people that have cost their country's fortunes and given those same countries no chance for success." "If you don't get away from this green scam, your country is going to fail. And I'm really good at predicting things, you know."
1:38

President Trump: "In 1982, the executive director of the United Nations Environmental Program predicted that by the year 2000 climate change would cause a global catastrophe. He said that it will be irreversible as any nuclear holocaust would be. This is what they said at the United Nations." "What happened? Here we are. Another UN official stated in 1989 that within a decade entire nations could be wiped off the map. By global warming. Not happening." "You know, it used to be global cooling. If you look back years ago in the 1920s and the 1930s they said global cooling will kill the world. We have to do something. Then they said global warming will kill the world. But then it started getting cooler." "So now they could just call it climate change because that way they can't miss. It's climate change. Because if it goes higher or lower, whatever the hell happens, there's climate change." "It's the greatest con job ever perpetrated on the world, in my opinion. Climate change, no matter what happens, you're involved in that. No more global warming." "No more global cooling. All of these predictions made by the United Nations and many others, often for bad reasons, were wrong. They were made by stupid people that have cost their country's fortunes and given those same countries no chance for success." "If you don't get away from this green scam, your country is going to fail. And I'm really good at predicting things, you know."

Camus

45,974 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

According to documents I have obtained from the Met Office shows that a staggering 80% of UK temperature stations are classified as 'poor or unreliable' by international standards (WMO Class 3–5). These classifications are used globally by the UN to assess climate data integrity. Despite this, these lower-grade stations are still being used, without correction, in national climate datasets like HadUK-Grid, which directly inform Net Zero policy, media narratives, and claims of “record-breaking” temperatures. Even more concerning, the Met Office admitted it has conducted no internal audits or reviews to assess how these poor-quality stations might be distorting national climate trends. Not in the past decade. Possibly never. The Net Zero narrative could potentially collapse completely once its underlying data is properly scrutinised.
8:55

According to documents I have obtained from the Met Office shows that a staggering 80% of UK temperature stations are classified as 'poor or unreliable' by international standards (WMO Class 3–5). These classifications are used globally by the UN to assess climate data integrity. Despite this, these lower-grade stations are still being used, without correction, in national climate datasets like HadUK-Grid, which directly inform Net Zero policy, media narratives, and claims of “record-breaking” temperatures. Even more concerning, the Met Office admitted it has conducted no internal audits or reviews to assess how these poor-quality stations might be distorting national climate trends. Not in the past decade. Possibly never. The Net Zero narrative could potentially collapse completely once its underlying data is properly scrutinised.

Lewis Brackpool

235,772 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Over the years, there have been many Hoaxes, all generated by the Radical Left Dumocrats, for purposes of destroying our Country. RUSSIA, RUSSIA, RUSSIA, UKRAINE, UKRAINE, UKRAINE, Global Warming, Impeachment Hoax #1, Impeachment Hoax #2, Men in Women’s Sports, Transgender for Everyone, and now, the decimation, or destruction, of AI, commonly known as Artificial Intelligence — And I, as President of the United States, will not stand by and let this happen. It all began with an attack on our Data Centers, until people realized how wealthy and prestigious they were for the Communities in which they were built. Higher Salaries, Lower Taxes, and Safer Streets, was the result, and the crazed Data Center attack has largely failed, so now, in much the same way as they changed the term “Global Warming” to “Climate Change,” in that it covers a much larger “territory” of doubt, they are going straight at AI. We will not in any way hinder or stifle the Growth of this incredible Industry. Rather, we will cherish it, help it, and watch over it, as it grows! However, we will also be looking for BAD, and we can do that, very easily, with our already existing Criminal and Civil Justice System. For this purpose, I am forming the AI Force, much like I did Space Force, which has been a tremendous SUCCESS, in my First Term. To that end, I will be announcing, in the near future, the AI “Czar” — Only High I.Q. individuals need apply! AI is the next Industrial Revolution, or Internet, but will be even larger and more impactful, possibly as much as 25% of our Country’s GDP. We are leading China, and the rest of the World, and I intend to keep it that way! President DONALD J. TRUMP ( TS: Sep 19 2026, 1:12 PM ET )​​​​​​​​‍‌​​​‍‍​‌​‍​‌‍‍‍‌‌​‍‍‌‌​‌‍​‌​​‌‍​‍
1:53

Over the years, there have been many Hoaxes, all generated by the Radical Left Dumocrats, for purposes of destroying our Country. RUSSIA, RUSSIA, RUSSIA, UKRAINE, UKRAINE, UKRAINE, Global Warming, Impeachment Hoax #1, Impeachment Hoax #2, Men in Women’s Sports, Transgender for Everyone, and now, the decimation, or destruction, of AI, commonly known as Artificial Intelligence — And I, as President of the United States, will not stand by and let this happen. It all began with an attack on our Data Centers, until people realized how wealthy and prestigious they were for the Communities in which they were built. Higher Salaries, Lower Taxes, and Safer Streets, was the result, and the crazed Data Center attack has largely failed, so now, in much the same way as they changed the term “Global Warming” to “Climate Change,” in that it covers a much larger “territory” of doubt, they are going straight at AI. We will not in any way hinder or stifle the Growth of this incredible Industry. Rather, we will cherish it, help it, and watch over it, as it grows! However, we will also be looking for BAD, and we can do that, very easily, with our already existing Criminal and Civil Justice System. For this purpose, I am forming the AI Force, much like I did Space Force, which has been a tremendous SUCCESS, in my First Term. To that end, I will be announcing, in the near future, the AI “Czar” — Only High I.Q. individuals need apply! AI is the next Industrial Revolution, or Internet, but will be even larger and more impactful, possibly as much as 25% of our Country’s GDP. We are leading China, and the rest of the World, and I intend to keep it that way! President DONALD J. TRUMP ( TS: Sep 19 2026, 1:12 PM ET )​​​​​​​​‍‌​​​‍‍​‌​‍​‌‍‍‍‌‌​‍‍‌‌​‌‍​‌​​‌‍​‍

Commentary Donald J. Trump Truth Social Posts On X

79,636 görüntüleme • 3 gün önce