正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

In the early 2000s, climate models projected warming, but the actual observations did not follow. This gap between models and measurements became known as 'the global warming pause'. The response to this discrepancy was not to revisit the models, it was to revisit the measurements. More weather stations were...

Electroversenet's profile picture

Electroverse

42,273 subscribers

34,837 次观看 • 5 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治科学技术
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Australia's Bureau of Meteorology has been audited station by station. The report reveals that the agency has systematically erased cooling trends from the historical record, replacing them with synthetic warming. At Rutherglen, Victoria for example, raw data from 1913 to 2006 showed a cooling trend. But the Bureau's adjusted chart flips this into warming. No physical justification, just statistical sleight of hand. Comparisons at Deniliquin also reveals the tactic - how past highs have been lowered to fit the narrative. Minimums from 1910 onward here are reduced by as much as 1.8C. These edits weren't based on new evidence. They were applied decades later by opaque homogenization models. The report's author calls it the rewriting of Australia's temperature history. But it's not just happening in Australia. Climate agencies in the UK and US have also cooled the past so as to exaggerate or even fabricate modern warming trends. This manipulated data is then paraded as truth by politicians and the media with the original measurements buried.
1:05

Australia's Bureau of Meteorology has been audited station by station. The report reveals that the agency has systematically erased cooling trends from the historical record, replacing them with synthetic warming. At Rutherglen, Victoria for example, raw data from 1913 to 2006 showed a cooling trend. But the Bureau's adjusted chart flips this into warming. No physical justification, just statistical sleight of hand. Comparisons at Deniliquin also reveals the tactic - how past highs have been lowered to fit the narrative. Minimums from 1910 onward here are reduced by as much as 1.8C. These edits weren't based on new evidence. They were applied decades later by opaque homogenization models. The report's author calls it the rewriting of Australia's temperature history. But it's not just happening in Australia. Climate agencies in the UK and US have also cooled the past so as to exaggerate or even fabricate modern warming trends. This manipulated data is then paraded as truth by politicians and the media with the original measurements buried.

Electroverse

247,591 次观看 • 21 天前

Scientists Kesten Green and Willie Soon found that the UN's climate models simply don't work. "IPCC climate models lack predictive validity and cannot guide policy," say the researchers. When tested on real forecasts instead of theory, the CO2-based models failed, often performing worse than just a random guess. Whereas simple models based solely on solar activity worked far better, even decades out. The whole 'climate crisis' depends on these models, not on actual measurements, but many run as much as 5C too hot. The IPCC was never about testing if man-made warming is actually real. It was built to promote the idea that it was real.
0:38

Scientists Kesten Green and Willie Soon found that the UN's climate models simply don't work. "IPCC climate models lack predictive validity and cannot guide policy," say the researchers. When tested on real forecasts instead of theory, the CO2-based models failed, often performing worse than just a random guess. Whereas simple models based solely on solar activity worked far better, even decades out. The whole 'climate crisis' depends on these models, not on actual measurements, but many run as much as 5C too hot. The IPCC was never about testing if man-made warming is actually real. It was built to promote the idea that it was real.

Electroverse

37,080 次观看 • 8 天前

Canada is not warming at twice the global average, as claimed. A report by data scientist Joseph Hickey examined Canada's official temperature records. It found a sudden nationwide 1C jump in 1998. The same year, 72 new stations were added. The increase was simultaneous across the country. But the climate doesn't behave like that. These step changes are what's known as measurement artifacts, typically caused by station moves or instrument changes. Remove the artificial jump, and Canada's supposed warming over the past seven decades largely disappears. Also, the official ECCC dataset contains more than 10,000 cases where daily minimum temperatures exceed maximums. A physical impossibility, of course. Canada's climate policy rests on this data. Correct it, and the government's core warming claim collapses.
0:44

Canada is not warming at twice the global average, as claimed. A report by data scientist Joseph Hickey examined Canada's official temperature records. It found a sudden nationwide 1C jump in 1998. The same year, 72 new stations were added. The increase was simultaneous across the country. But the climate doesn't behave like that. These step changes are what's known as measurement artifacts, typically caused by station moves or instrument changes. Remove the artificial jump, and Canada's supposed warming over the past seven decades largely disappears. Also, the official ECCC dataset contains more than 10,000 cases where daily minimum temperatures exceed maximums. A physical impossibility, of course. Canada's climate policy rests on this data. Correct it, and the government's core warming claim collapses.

Electroverse

12,968 次观看 • 28 天前

Canada is NOT warming at twice the global average, as claimed by ECCC. A report by data scientist Joseph Hickey examined Canada's official temperature records. It found a sudden nationwide +1C jump in 1998 - the same year 72 new stations were added. The increase was simultaneous across the country. But the climate doesn't behave like that. These step changes are what's known as 'measurement artifacts', typically caused by station moves or instrument changes. Remove the artificial jump, and Canada's warming over the past seven decades largely disappears. Also, the official ECCC dataset contains more than 10,000 cases where daily 'minimum' temperatures exceed 'maximums' - a physical impossibility. Canada's climate policy rests on this data. Correct it, and the government's core warming claim collapses.
0:44

Canada is NOT warming at twice the global average, as claimed by ECCC. A report by data scientist Joseph Hickey examined Canada's official temperature records. It found a sudden nationwide +1C jump in 1998 - the same year 72 new stations were added. The increase was simultaneous across the country. But the climate doesn't behave like that. These step changes are what's known as 'measurement artifacts', typically caused by station moves or instrument changes. Remove the artificial jump, and Canada's warming over the past seven decades largely disappears. Also, the official ECCC dataset contains more than 10,000 cases where daily 'minimum' temperatures exceed 'maximums' - a physical impossibility. Canada's climate policy rests on this data. Correct it, and the government's core warming claim collapses.

Electroverse

15,641 次观看 • 5 个月前

The global mean surface temperature today is only about 1C warmer than it was in 1880. This modest rise has been framed as a 'climate emergency,' yet in historical context it is trivial. Global temperatures have fluctuated by more than 10C over natural glacial cycles long before industrialization. Even during the Holocene, recent periods such as the Medieval Warm Period were far warmer than today without triggering catastrophe. The data show no runaway warming or planetary collapse. In fact, historical records reveal warmth is beneficial to humanity and to life in general. This disconnect between reality and the apocalyptic rhetoric exposes the ruse. There is no "climate crisis."
0:42

The global mean surface temperature today is only about 1C warmer than it was in 1880. This modest rise has been framed as a 'climate emergency,' yet in historical context it is trivial. Global temperatures have fluctuated by more than 10C over natural glacial cycles long before industrialization. Even during the Holocene, recent periods such as the Medieval Warm Period were far warmer than today without triggering catastrophe. The data show no runaway warming or planetary collapse. In fact, historical records reveal warmth is beneficial to humanity and to life in general. This disconnect between reality and the apocalyptic rhetoric exposes the ruse. There is no "climate crisis."

Electroverse

31,635 次观看 • 18 天前

Greenland Temperature Study Challenges Climate Narratives: The Data Speaks | Climate Conservative Consumer Recent analysis of MODIS satellite data (2000–2019) reveals Greenland’s surface temperatures remained remarkably stable, challenging narratives of rapid Arctic warming. The study, covering 31,464 observations across 36 sub-regions, found minimal long-term trends—only a slight cooling of ~0.05°C per decade, with three of four regions showing no significant change and the South region cooling slightly. This contrasts with expectations of accelerated warming, though seasonal patterns remained consistent. The findings suggest factors beyond surface temperature, such as ocean currents or ice dynamics, may drive observed ice sheet changes. Ice-free areas showed higher average temperatures than ice-covered regions but neither displayed significant warming, challenging assumptions that ice-free regions would warm faster. The study aligns with other research indicating slowed warming since the 1990s, complicating climate model assumptions. While MODIS data has limitations (e.g., cloud cover), the results highlight complex Arctic climate dynamics, urging reevaluation of ice melt drivers and their implications for sea level projections. The analysis divided Greenland into four primary regions (North, Central-North, Central-South, South), each with nine sub-regions, using statistical methods to isolate long-term trends from seasonal variability. These results underscore the need for honest integration of such findings into climate science discourse, emphasizing the complexity of Arctic climate dynamics and demanding reassessment of current climate models. Read more:
4:17

Greenland Temperature Study Challenges Climate Narratives: The Data Speaks | Climate Conservative Consumer Recent analysis of MODIS satellite data (2000–2019) reveals Greenland’s surface temperatures remained remarkably stable, challenging narratives of rapid Arctic warming. The study, covering 31,464 observations across 36 sub-regions, found minimal long-term trends—only a slight cooling of ~0.05°C per decade, with three of four regions showing no significant change and the South region cooling slightly. This contrasts with expectations of accelerated warming, though seasonal patterns remained consistent. The findings suggest factors beyond surface temperature, such as ocean currents or ice dynamics, may drive observed ice sheet changes. Ice-free areas showed higher average temperatures than ice-covered regions but neither displayed significant warming, challenging assumptions that ice-free regions would warm faster. The study aligns with other research indicating slowed warming since the 1990s, complicating climate model assumptions. While MODIS data has limitations (e.g., cloud cover), the results highlight complex Arctic climate dynamics, urging reevaluation of ice melt drivers and their implications for sea level projections. The analysis divided Greenland into four primary regions (North, Central-North, Central-South, South), each with nine sub-regions, using statistical methods to isolate long-term trends from seasonal variability. These results underscore the need for honest integration of such findings into climate science discourse, emphasizing the complexity of Arctic climate dynamics and demanding reassessment of current climate models. Read more:

Owen Gregorian

129,879 次观看 • 1 年前

This is brilliant! Dana Pena schools a climate alarmist. If sea levels were truly to rise even 10ft that would put large parts of the world including the UK and the southern part of the US under water. Yet no property investment prospects highlight any risk of global warming. If it were really true banks wouldn’t invest. ‘It’s the greatest fraud that’s been perpetuated on mankind this century.’ 💥🔥💥
3:00

This is brilliant! Dana Pena schools a climate alarmist. If sea levels were truly to rise even 10ft that would put large parts of the world including the UK and the southern part of the US under water. Yet no property investment prospects highlight any risk of global warming. If it were really true banks wouldn’t invest. ‘It’s the greatest fraud that’s been perpetuated on mankind this century.’ 💥🔥💥

Kat A 🌸

132,739 次观看 • 9 个月前

The UK Met Office has again been caught publishing temperatures from weather stations that don't exist. An FOI revealed Lowestoft closed in 2010, yet the Met Office kept issuing official temperatures for it. The office said they were using well-correlated neighboring stations, but the FOI revealed that this was a lie. The numbers were actually coming from a model that was inventing data from 'phantom' neighboring stations. When exposed, the office quietly deleted years of readings for Lowestoft, as well as a number of other stations, and added a disclaimer saying their data is "for general interest only." FOIs also show over one third of Met Office stations never existed, and that real high-quality sites like Colwood are ignored. Also, more than 80% of the network is low-grade class 4 or 5, by WMO standards, giving 2-5C uncertainty. This is the foundation of the UK's climate record – closed stations, imaginary stations and synthetic temperatures. The Met Office isn't credible.
0:57

The UK Met Office has again been caught publishing temperatures from weather stations that don't exist. An FOI revealed Lowestoft closed in 2010, yet the Met Office kept issuing official temperatures for it. The office said they were using well-correlated neighboring stations, but the FOI revealed that this was a lie. The numbers were actually coming from a model that was inventing data from 'phantom' neighboring stations. When exposed, the office quietly deleted years of readings for Lowestoft, as well as a number of other stations, and added a disclaimer saying their data is "for general interest only." FOIs also show over one third of Met Office stations never existed, and that real high-quality sites like Colwood are ignored. Also, more than 80% of the network is low-grade class 4 or 5, by WMO standards, giving 2-5C uncertainty. This is the foundation of the UK's climate record – closed stations, imaginary stations and synthetic temperatures. The Met Office isn't credible.

Electroverse

40,016 次观看 • 3 个月前

The IPCC says snowfall should become less frequent in a warming world. Yet when Japan was buried by record snow in January 2026, the explanation changed. Researchers claimed global warming increased the snowfall. The storm itself was straightforward: a prolonged surge of Arctic air crossed the Sea of Japan, producing intense snowbands. Sapporo transport shut down. Aomori set depth records. Communities across northern Honshu were buried. And Japan's army was even deployed. Instead of simply pointing to the cold air outbreak though, researchers at Japan's Meteorological Institute instead ran climate model simulations. The models concluded warming increased snowfall by about 7%. So the theory now reads: global warming reduces snow, except when it increases snow... Under this framework, every possible outcome appears to confirm the same conclusion. "A theory that explains everything explains nothing."
0:53

The IPCC says snowfall should become less frequent in a warming world. Yet when Japan was buried by record snow in January 2026, the explanation changed. Researchers claimed global warming increased the snowfall. The storm itself was straightforward: a prolonged surge of Arctic air crossed the Sea of Japan, producing intense snowbands. Sapporo transport shut down. Aomori set depth records. Communities across northern Honshu were buried. And Japan's army was even deployed. Instead of simply pointing to the cold air outbreak though, researchers at Japan's Meteorological Institute instead ran climate model simulations. The models concluded warming increased snowfall by about 7%. So the theory now reads: global warming reduces snow, except when it increases snow... Under this framework, every possible outcome appears to confirm the same conclusion. "A theory that explains everything explains nothing."

Electroverse

14,704 次观看 • 1 个月前

Global Warming, Global Cooling, Climate Change — Which Lie Are We Paying for Today?” When I was a kid, it was global cooling. Then it was global warming. Now it’s just “climate change.” We were told: 🌎 Ice caps gone by 2000 🌎 Cities underwater 🌎 Humanity extinct Decades later — we are still here while spending TRILLIONS fighting “climate change.” Taxes are higher. Energy is unaffordable. Freedom is shrinking. And the climate? Hasn’t changed. If this was really about saving the planet, would the elites be: Buying oceanfront mansions? Flying private jets to “climate summits”? Cashing in on carbon credits? This isn’t about saving the planet. It’s about controlling the people —and making the right people rich. President Trump was right. This is the climate hoax of our time.
1:05

Global Warming, Global Cooling, Climate Change — Which Lie Are We Paying for Today?” When I was a kid, it was global cooling. Then it was global warming. Now it’s just “climate change.” We were told: 🌎 Ice caps gone by 2000 🌎 Cities underwater 🌎 Humanity extinct Decades later — we are still here while spending TRILLIONS fighting “climate change.” Taxes are higher. Energy is unaffordable. Freedom is shrinking. And the climate? Hasn’t changed. If this was really about saving the planet, would the elites be: Buying oceanfront mansions? Flying private jets to “climate summits”? Cashing in on carbon credits? This isn’t about saving the planet. It’s about controlling the people —and making the right people rich. President Trump was right. This is the climate hoax of our time.

Lisa Robinson

22,231 次观看 • 10 个月前

In 2016, the Netherlands Meteorological Institute adjusted temperatures at De Bilt - the country's main climate station. Daily maximums from 1901 to 1950 were lowered by up to 1.9C, which removed 16 of 23 heatwaves from the record. The altered data were then used to claim modern heatwaves were unprecedented. Four researchers challenged the changes. But the institute dismissed the criticism. So the analysis went to peer review. In 2021, it was published, conclusively demonstrating the method systematically erased historical heat extremes. Today, the Meteorological Institute has quietly changed its approach, and as a result, seven erased heatwaves have been restored. Here again, we have a government agency caught rewriting climate history. The Netherlands Meteorological Institute erased heatwaves of the past, ignored critics, and reinstated the truth only when the evidence became impossible to ignore. Policies were built on that manipulated record. Dutch farmers lost livelihoods. Industry and the wider economy paid the price. But accountability is coming...
1:03

In 2016, the Netherlands Meteorological Institute adjusted temperatures at De Bilt - the country's main climate station. Daily maximums from 1901 to 1950 were lowered by up to 1.9C, which removed 16 of 23 heatwaves from the record. The altered data were then used to claim modern heatwaves were unprecedented. Four researchers challenged the changes. But the institute dismissed the criticism. So the analysis went to peer review. In 2021, it was published, conclusively demonstrating the method systematically erased historical heat extremes. Today, the Meteorological Institute has quietly changed its approach, and as a result, seven erased heatwaves have been restored. Here again, we have a government agency caught rewriting climate history. The Netherlands Meteorological Institute erased heatwaves of the past, ignored critics, and reinstated the truth only when the evidence became impossible to ignore. Policies were built on that manipulated record. Dutch farmers lost livelihoods. Industry and the wider economy paid the price. But accountability is coming...

Electroverse

472,731 次观看 • 5 个月前

lol This is a crock of crap. Climate “scientists” cannot get their climate models to produce accurate hindcasts of 20th century global mean surface temperature (GMST) observations without having precursory knowledge of 20th century observations to calibrate them to. That's curve fitting, not science. These models also run on circular reasoning. When global climate models (GCMs) are input with the supposedly “established physics” you mentioned, the energy fluxes in and out of the Earth’s atmosphere are not balanced, which causes the models to drift into unrealistic climate states (either too hot or too cold, but usually running too hot). Rather than doing real science to try figuring out why the best physics we have don't yield correct values, scientists simply assume that fluxes were balanced before the Industrial Revolution. They then adjust any uncertain parameters (e.g., clouds and aerosol) to force energy fluxes to balance. It is then assumed that there are no natural pathways that can cause energy imbalance, so modelers input CO₂ forcing, the climate system warms, and they say, “See!? CO₂ caused the warming.” While it may prove that there is at least some effects from CO₂, all else being equal, it in no way, shape or form proves that all of the observed warming is due to CO₂. They assumed it was at the outset, then forced their GCMs to produce that result. That's circular logic, not science. We also know model outputs are just statistical curve fitting because while the GMST response to a forcing has one value, the range of uncertainty in the aerosol contribution to GMST change since 1850 is 1°C. If you take the median of the CMIP6 models shown in Figure 3.8 from IPCC AR6 WG1, the uncertainty is a whopping 125%. If you don’t know that vital piece of information about aerosol forcing, you cannot have any confidence whatsoever in anything else. Arguing with me about this is not going to go well for you, I'm afraid. If you need an explainer that isn't so jargon-filled, Dr. Roy Spencer has a good one in the video below from a presentation he gave on March 3, 2021.
1:42

lol This is a crock of crap. Climate “scientists” cannot get their climate models to produce accurate hindcasts of 20th century global mean surface temperature (GMST) observations without having precursory knowledge of 20th century observations to calibrate them to. That's curve fitting, not science. These models also run on circular reasoning. When global climate models (GCMs) are input with the supposedly “established physics” you mentioned, the energy fluxes in and out of the Earth’s atmosphere are not balanced, which causes the models to drift into unrealistic climate states (either too hot or too cold, but usually running too hot). Rather than doing real science to try figuring out why the best physics we have don't yield correct values, scientists simply assume that fluxes were balanced before the Industrial Revolution. They then adjust any uncertain parameters (e.g., clouds and aerosol) to force energy fluxes to balance. It is then assumed that there are no natural pathways that can cause energy imbalance, so modelers input CO₂ forcing, the climate system warms, and they say, “See!? CO₂ caused the warming.” While it may prove that there is at least some effects from CO₂, all else being equal, it in no way, shape or form proves that all of the observed warming is due to CO₂. They assumed it was at the outset, then forced their GCMs to produce that result. That's circular logic, not science. We also know model outputs are just statistical curve fitting because while the GMST response to a forcing has one value, the range of uncertainty in the aerosol contribution to GMST change since 1850 is 1°C. If you take the median of the CMIP6 models shown in Figure 3.8 from IPCC AR6 WG1, the uncertainty is a whopping 125%. If you don’t know that vital piece of information about aerosol forcing, you cannot have any confidence whatsoever in anything else. Arguing with me about this is not going to go well for you, I'm afraid. If you need an explainer that isn't so jargon-filled, Dr. Roy Spencer has a good one in the video below from a presentation he gave on March 3, 2021.

Chris Martz

27,313 次观看 • 5 天前

Sea Levels Not Surging Despite Years Of Climate Activists And Corporate Media Freaking Out, Study Finds | Audrey Streb, Daily Caller News Foundation One recent study compiling sea level rise data shows oceans are not surging as much as the scientific world previously projected and corporate media has repeatedly sounded the alarm over. The Journal of Marine Science and Engineering published the peer-reviewed study on Aug. 27, authored by Dutch engineering consultant Hessel G. Voortman and independent researcher Rob De Vos. The study concluded that the average rate of sea level rise in 2020 was well below other widely cited analyses, and that when projections were compared with local data, there was little evidence climate change was driving the acceleration seen in a few regions — a finding energy policy experts told the Daily Caller News Foundation challenges mainstream climate change orthodoxy. “Overall, this study indicates that in most places, sea levels are not rising unusually quickly. In the relatively few locations where sea levels are rising faster than average, the cause is almost certainly local factors such as land subsidence or ground compaction,” Sterling Burnett, director of the Arthur B. Robinson Center on Climate and Environmental Policy at The Heartland Institute, told the DCNF. “Global sea levels are currently rising more slowly than they have for much of the time since the last ice age ended — a period during which seas rose more than 400 feet. Any possible increase in the recent rate of rise compared with the past century is small, within the margin of error, and not outside historical patterns.” Though the report doesn’t account for sea level rise everywhere, Voortman told journalist Michael Shellenberger on Tuesday that he was surprised no one had compiled such a study before, noting it is the first to compare projections with recorded local data from the past century. The two data sets the researchers drew from did have some gaps, which meant that most sections in the world with usable data were in the Northern Hemisphere, with several of the “selected stations” spanning North America, Europe and Japan. Gaps in the data included regions around Australia, the northeast of Latin America, East Asia and most of Africa. “The average rate of sea level rise in 2020 is (only) around 1.5 mm/year (15 cm per century)” Voortman said Tuesday. “This is significantly lower than the 3 to 4 mm/year often reported by climate scientists in scientific literature and the media.” The report notes that in the data sets the researchers used, “approximately 95% of the suitable locations show no statistically significant acceleration of the rate of sea level rise,” and that regions that did see a spike in sea level likely “local, non-climatic phenomena are a plausible cause of the accelerated sea level rise observed at the remaining 5% of the suitable locations.” “It is crazy that it had not been done. … I started doing this research in 2021 by doing the literature review. ‘Who has done the comparison of the projections with the observations?’ And there were none,” Voortman said Tuesday. “I had to do a lot of programming and automate data imports and data management. I organized it by using databases so that I really knew what I was doing. It was very structured because I was dealing with 150,000 locations and, on average, 100 years of data. That made one and a half million lines of data. I found myself for days working on things that I felt, ‘This is more computer science than civil engineering.'” Steve Milloy, senior fellow at the Energy & Environment Legal Institute, told the DCNF that “there are a lot of additional factors that can affect tide gauge measurements including geological changes, groundwater withdrawal, and land use. But climate alarmists falsely chalk up all changes to polar ice melting caused by emissions-driven ‘global warming.'” A few other studies have been published of late that also challenge climate change hysteria, with one widely reported study showing that Arctic Sea ice melting has slowed in the last 20 years. Another recent report found that a 2024 climate change study — heavily cited by legacy media for projecting up to $38 trillion in global damages by 2050 — relied on inaccurate data.
4:31

Sea Levels Not Surging Despite Years Of Climate Activists And Corporate Media Freaking Out, Study Finds | Audrey Streb, Daily Caller News Foundation One recent study compiling sea level rise data shows oceans are not surging as much as the scientific world previously projected and corporate media has repeatedly sounded the alarm over. The Journal of Marine Science and Engineering published the peer-reviewed study on Aug. 27, authored by Dutch engineering consultant Hessel G. Voortman and independent researcher Rob De Vos. The study concluded that the average rate of sea level rise in 2020 was well below other widely cited analyses, and that when projections were compared with local data, there was little evidence climate change was driving the acceleration seen in a few regions — a finding energy policy experts told the Daily Caller News Foundation challenges mainstream climate change orthodoxy. “Overall, this study indicates that in most places, sea levels are not rising unusually quickly. In the relatively few locations where sea levels are rising faster than average, the cause is almost certainly local factors such as land subsidence or ground compaction,” Sterling Burnett, director of the Arthur B. Robinson Center on Climate and Environmental Policy at The Heartland Institute, told the DCNF. “Global sea levels are currently rising more slowly than they have for much of the time since the last ice age ended — a period during which seas rose more than 400 feet. Any possible increase in the recent rate of rise compared with the past century is small, within the margin of error, and not outside historical patterns.” Though the report doesn’t account for sea level rise everywhere, Voortman told journalist Michael Shellenberger on Tuesday that he was surprised no one had compiled such a study before, noting it is the first to compare projections with recorded local data from the past century. The two data sets the researchers drew from did have some gaps, which meant that most sections in the world with usable data were in the Northern Hemisphere, with several of the “selected stations” spanning North America, Europe and Japan. Gaps in the data included regions around Australia, the northeast of Latin America, East Asia and most of Africa. “The average rate of sea level rise in 2020 is (only) around 1.5 mm/year (15 cm per century)” Voortman said Tuesday. “This is significantly lower than the 3 to 4 mm/year often reported by climate scientists in scientific literature and the media.” The report notes that in the data sets the researchers used, “approximately 95% of the suitable locations show no statistically significant acceleration of the rate of sea level rise,” and that regions that did see a spike in sea level likely “local, non-climatic phenomena are a plausible cause of the accelerated sea level rise observed at the remaining 5% of the suitable locations.” “It is crazy that it had not been done. … I started doing this research in 2021 by doing the literature review. ‘Who has done the comparison of the projections with the observations?’ And there were none,” Voortman said Tuesday. “I had to do a lot of programming and automate data imports and data management. I organized it by using databases so that I really knew what I was doing. It was very structured because I was dealing with 150,000 locations and, on average, 100 years of data. That made one and a half million lines of data. I found myself for days working on things that I felt, ‘This is more computer science than civil engineering.'” Steve Milloy, senior fellow at the Energy & Environment Legal Institute, told the DCNF that “there are a lot of additional factors that can affect tide gauge measurements including geological changes, groundwater withdrawal, and land use. But climate alarmists falsely chalk up all changes to polar ice melting caused by emissions-driven ‘global warming.'” A few other studies have been published of late that also challenge climate change hysteria, with one widely reported study showing that Arctic Sea ice melting has slowed in the last 20 years. Another recent report found that a 2024 climate change study — heavily cited by legacy media for projecting up to $38 trillion in global damages by 2050 — relied on inaccurate data.

Owen Gregorian

105,142 次观看 • 10 个月前

During the 2020 Election votes on DOMINION voting machines were disappearing and appearing in the dead of night in CLARKE and FULTON COUNTY, Georgia. Logs stored on USB drives required by law were changed from the end of one vote count day, at close, to the next day, when the counting resumed the next day. When an audit was granted, a useless visual examination of ONLY the outside of the USB drives were allowed. No internal information on the USB drives were allowed to be accessed during the audit. This coincides with the recent information what also happened in Fulton county, GA, with their logs from election officials when election stations were opened and closed as well, which 315,000 votes were not authenticated because the chain of custody was broken. Hundreds of thousands of duplicate votes were also counted and a total of 364,000 ineligible voters were NOT cleaned off of the voter roles prior to the election, WHY? Because it was a cover-up. They knew EXACTLY what they were doing, and that was to steal the 2020 Election.
4:17

During the 2020 Election votes on DOMINION voting machines were disappearing and appearing in the dead of night in CLARKE and FULTON COUNTY, Georgia. Logs stored on USB drives required by law were changed from the end of one vote count day, at close, to the next day, when the counting resumed the next day. When an audit was granted, a useless visual examination of ONLY the outside of the USB drives were allowed. No internal information on the USB drives were allowed to be accessed during the audit. This coincides with the recent information what also happened in Fulton county, GA, with their logs from election officials when election stations were opened and closed as well, which 315,000 votes were not authenticated because the chain of custody was broken. Hundreds of thousands of duplicate votes were also counted and a total of 364,000 ineligible voters were NOT cleaned off of the voter roles prior to the election, WHY? Because it was a cover-up. They knew EXACTLY what they were doing, and that was to steal the 2020 Election.

The SCIF

79,077 次观看 • 7 个月前

Global warming? There is a clear global warming especially in the last 45 years, with 2023-2024 being the warmest years on satellite records. However, the current global temperature is not warm. It is only ~1.2°C higher than in 1850, one of the coldest years in the last 10,000 years. And the current climate is one of the coldest of the last 485 million years. Global warming is primarily driven by natural cycles. Humans are not the control factor. There is no man-made climate crisis. This is my usual compendium with automatic audio using a text-to-audio AI application. It still needs to improve, but it's already quite acceptable!
40:19

Global warming? There is a clear global warming especially in the last 45 years, with 2023-2024 being the warmest years on satellite records. However, the current global temperature is not warm. It is only ~1.2°C higher than in 1850, one of the coldest years in the last 10,000 years. And the current climate is one of the coldest of the last 485 million years. Global warming is primarily driven by natural cycles. Humans are not the control factor. There is no man-made climate crisis. This is my usual compendium with automatic audio using a text-to-audio AI application. It still needs to improve, but it's already quite acceptable!

JOSE GEFAELL

18,902 次观看 • 1 年前

We are seeing a lot of confusion about "Body to Body", so just to clear things up: Yoongi and Namjoon were not against using the Arirang sample. What they had concerns about was how it was layered in the track. In the earlier version, the sample was much louder and overlapped with the vocals, which made it overwhelming for listeners. The final version we got is different, with the sample more subtly blended into the background. So, to be clear, they were not against the Arirang sample itself. The version we hear today reflects adjustments made after those initial concerns were raised.
0:33

We are seeing a lot of confusion about "Body to Body", so just to clear things up: Yoongi and Namjoon were not against using the Arirang sample. What they had concerns about was how it was layered in the track. In the earlier version, the sample was much louder and overlapped with the vocals, which made it overwhelming for listeners. The final version we got is different, with the sample more subtly blended into the background. So, to be clear, they were not against the Arirang sample itself. The version we hear today reflects adjustments made after those initial concerns were raised.

AGUST D CHARTS

243,378 次观看 • 4 个月前

Randomly did this music video with Fab when I was 19, the rest of the models were in their 30’s and some of them were mean as hell lmao. I had no idea I was gonna be the main girl in the video. He was tryna put me on and get me signed to the talent agency that booked the other models, but I told him I really just wanna make art. So he changed the video from pouring paint on my body, to me being drawn instead and I draw the last scene of the video.
0:27

Randomly did this music video with Fab when I was 19, the rest of the models were in their 30’s and some of them were mean as hell lmao. I had no idea I was gonna be the main girl in the video. He was tryna put me on and get me signed to the talent agency that booked the other models, but I told him I really just wanna make art. So he changed the video from pouring paint on my body, to me being drawn instead and I draw the last scene of the video.

EarthtoGazelle

33,836 次观看 • 1 年前

"The climate crisis is a health crisis—not in the future, but now." Tedros at the UN's COP30 climate summit. "Healthy people depend on a healthy planet. If our planet were a patient, it would be admitted to intensive care." "It's running a high fever, with the average global temperatures increasing year after year. Its lung capacity is compromised with the destruction of forests that absorb carbon dioxide and produce oxygen." And yet, in order to ease traffic to COP30, tens of thousands of acres of protected Amazon rainforest were bulldozed to make way for a new four-lane highway. 🤡
1:41

"The climate crisis is a health crisis—not in the future, but now." Tedros at the UN's COP30 climate summit. "Healthy people depend on a healthy planet. If our planet were a patient, it would be admitted to intensive care." "It's running a high fever, with the average global temperatures increasing year after year. Its lung capacity is compromised with the destruction of forests that absorb carbon dioxide and produce oxygen." And yet, in order to ease traffic to COP30, tens of thousands of acres of protected Amazon rainforest were bulldozed to make way for a new four-lane highway. 🤡

Wide Awake Media

31,652 次观看 • 8 个月前

This is not Gaza, This is #Pune⚡ The biggest bulldozer action in the history of India was carried out in Pimpri Chinchwad area of Pune where 900 acres of land was cleared from Bangladeshi and Rohingya infiltrators. 30 petitions were filed in the High Court to stop the bulldozer action but all were dismissed Major #demolition drive carried out in Kudalwadi area of Pimpri Chinchwad. The area was known as Mini-Pakistan in the locality as crime was also increasing in the illegally occupied zone. #Rohingyas and #Bangladeshis were also said to be hiding in the region!
2:10

This is not Gaza, This is #Pune⚡ The biggest bulldozer action in the history of India was carried out in Pimpri Chinchwad area of Pune where 900 acres of land was cleared from Bangladeshi and Rohingya infiltrators. 30 petitions were filed in the High Court to stop the bulldozer action but all were dismissed Major #demolition drive carried out in Kudalwadi area of Pimpri Chinchwad. The area was known as Mini-Pakistan in the locality as crime was also increasing in the illegally occupied zone. #Rohingyas and #Bangladeshis were also said to be hiding in the region!

Prabhakar Singh Parihar प्रभाकर सिँह परिहार

83,560 次观看 • 1 年前

Putin in the city of Russian nuclear scientists: I won't go into details now, but many specialists who worked in Los Alamos, in the USA, they also collaborated with Russia. They were not trivial spies, in the literal sense of the word. They were not spies at all. They were simply smart people and understood that in order to protect humanity from the genie they were releasing from the bottle, it was necessary to create a balance. They did this, helping our scientists work.
0:42

Putin in the city of Russian nuclear scientists: I won't go into details now, but many specialists who worked in Los Alamos, in the USA, they also collaborated with Russia. They were not trivial spies, in the literal sense of the word. They were not spies at all. They were simply smart people and understood that in order to protect humanity from the genie they were releasing from the bottle, it was necessary to create a balance. They did this, helping our scientists work.

Victor vicktop55 commentary

60,254 次观看 • 11 个月前