正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

In the final week before Election Day, fears about election interference resurfaced after arsonists burned ballots in three states. Our reporters try to make sense of it all:

The New York Times

53,835,783 subscribers

80,398 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

8 条评论

SouthHamptonUpper1 的头像

SouthHamptonUpper11 年前

Democrats did that in Oregon.

AmericanRebel 的头像

AmericanRebel1 年前

Election fraud is happening right in front of our eyes.

Narrative Disrupter 的头像

Narrative Disrupter1 年前

Hey, @nytimes, when are you going to post on X about your blatant, immoral attempts to censor conservative voices on Youtube? We all know that your 'misinformation' is just a codeword for any conservative speech whatsoever. Why do you hate the First Amendment?

Cereus Blooms 的头像

Cereus Blooms1 年前

Pretty much only the psychopaths in power burning things down/rioting/looting. It’s all Liberal/Democrat radical domestic terrorism and the source is the Deep State billionaires pulling presidential puppet strings. Same is happening in Canada.

Elite Props 的头像

Elite Props1 年前

You have 30 likes. YOU HAVEN’T GOT THE SCRIPT. U HAVE FAILED. Majority of the public 70% think you’re biased and considering the vast majority of the US thinks you are lying and you are trying to suppress non-warmonger parties and views. You’re piece attacking NEW MEDIA sucks. FU

Hip Zippy 的头像

Hip Zippy1 年前

No report of the fraudulent ballots in Pennsylvania. NYT is a one sided radical left news center. Only one point of view matters to the NYTimes... the left

Mario Furious 的头像

Mario Furious1 年前

"arsonists" = crazed democrat operatives and homeless

lharp1 的头像

lharp11 年前

Probably carried out by Leftie jerks.

相关视频

#BREAKING: Steele: “…on Monday the Supreme Court will hear arguments in a case that could UPEND the midterms. The case centers on whether states can accept mail-in ballots postmarked before election day, even if they arrive to election offices after election day…if the court rules against that grace period, it could have MASSIVE ramifications for the 14 states that currently accept ballots that arrive after election day, and the 28 states plus Washington DC that accept ballots from military and overseas voters that arrive after election day if they’ve been postmarked before election day.”😳

#BREAKING: Steele: “…on Monday the Supreme Court will hear arguments in a case that could UPEND the midterms. The case centers on whether states can accept mail-in ballots postmarked before election day, even if they arrive to election offices after election day…if the court rules against that grace period, it could have MASSIVE ramifications for the 14 states that currently accept ballots that arrive after election day, and the 28 states plus Washington DC that accept ballots from military and overseas voters that arrive after election day if they’ve been postmarked before election day.”😳

Emoluments Clause

49,308 次观看 • 5 个月前

🚨 BREAKING: The Supreme Court appears poised to STRIKE DOWN allowing mail-in ballots to be received days or weeks after election day Assistant AG Harmeet Dhillon NAILS IT: "We argued in our brief that because Congress has these laws that refer to an election DAY, election day should mean election DAY, meaning the last day by which ballots can be received by the state and processed." "And so here, Mississippi allows it for five days, some states allow it for 10 days, up to 21 days, eight states don't even require a postmark on mail ballots." "I think that's actually going to be a positive development for voter confidence in the outcome of our elections, regardless of your party, because we're going to know that final means final, and there aren't some shenanigans with a bunch of people, your neighbor or whoever, delivering a dump of ballots into the mail after the election day." We need this for the republic! One ELECTION DAY.

🚨 BREAKING: The Supreme Court appears poised to STRIKE DOWN allowing mail-in ballots to be received days or weeks after election day Assistant AG Harmeet Dhillon NAILS IT: "We argued in our brief that because Congress has these laws that refer to an election DAY, election day should mean election DAY, meaning the last day by which ballots can be received by the state and processed." "And so here, Mississippi allows it for five days, some states allow it for 10 days, up to 21 days, eight states don't even require a postmark on mail ballots." "I think that's actually going to be a positive development for voter confidence in the outcome of our elections, regardless of your party, because we're going to know that final means final, and there aren't some shenanigans with a bunch of people, your neighbor or whoever, delivering a dump of ballots into the mail after the election day." We need this for the republic! One ELECTION DAY.

Eric Daugherty

376,333 次观看 • 5 个月前

Dr. Shiva exposes a massive bombshell in the Arizona Senate about the 2020 election and mail-in ballots: "Almost all of the mail-in ballots that arrived after Election Day from Nov. 4th to Nov. 9th were duplicate ballots. Ballots from people who had already sent one in." This wasn’t a few hundred. This was the overwhelming majority of late ballots. This is when Trump was so far ahead on election night, multiple states shut down and injected as many ballots as possible into the election to obtain the margin of victory over Trump to steal the 2020 election.

Dr. Shiva exposes a massive bombshell in the Arizona Senate about the 2020 election and mail-in ballots: "Almost all of the mail-in ballots that arrived after Election Day from Nov. 4th to Nov. 9th were duplicate ballots. Ballots from people who had already sent one in." This wasn’t a few hundred. This was the overwhelming majority of late ballots. This is when Trump was so far ahead on election night, multiple states shut down and injected as many ballots as possible into the election to obtain the margin of victory over Trump to steal the 2020 election.

The SCIF

41,519 次观看 • 6 个月前

In some states, Election Day means election week—or even election month. U.S. Department of Justice stands firm: Election Day means ELECTION DAY. DOJ Civil Rights Division will continue to protect our federal elections!

In some states, Election Day means election week—or even election month. U.S. Department of Justice stands firm: Election Day means ELECTION DAY. DOJ Civil Rights Division will continue to protect our federal elections!

AAGHarmeetDhillon

60,267 次观看 • 5 个月前

Johnson: In California, they hold elections open for weeks after Election Day. We had three candidates that were ahead… in no series of ballots that came in after Election Day were our candidates ahead. It looks on its face to be fraudulent. Can I prove that? No.

Johnson: In California, they hold elections open for weeks after Election Day. We had three candidates that were ahead… in no series of ballots that came in after Election Day were our candidates ahead. It looks on its face to be fraudulent. Can I prove that? No.

Acyn

257,501 次观看 • 6 个月前

Here it is: The single most damning piece of evidence of election treachery in the entire 2020 election: Katie Hobbs manufactured 163,266 mail-in ballots one month after the November 3, 2020, election. “During the period when they needed extra time to count—which is now something they do in every election (they didn’t do it before; it’s new since 2020, and now they do it every time)—they picked up (i.e., manufactured) 163,266 ballots that never existed. Now, how do you pick up ballots that never existed? How do ballots get into the system one month after the election—after the fact—when you can’t prove they were in the system before the fact?” 📝 Katie Hobbs sent out 1.5 million additional mail-in ballots. “If Maricopa has 2,595,272 voters, why did Maricopa mail just under 4.1 million mail-in ballots?” Backfilling. 📝 Pass the SAVE Act. Election Day is not election week, election month, or election year.

Here it is: The single most damning piece of evidence of election treachery in the entire 2020 election: Katie Hobbs manufactured 163,266 mail-in ballots one month after the November 3, 2020, election. “During the period when they needed extra time to count—which is now something they do in every election (they didn’t do it before; it’s new since 2020, and now they do it every time)—they picked up (i.e., manufactured) 163,266 ballots that never existed. Now, how do you pick up ballots that never existed? How do ballots get into the system one month after the election—after the fact—when you can’t prove they were in the system before the fact?” 📝 Katie Hobbs sent out 1.5 million additional mail-in ballots. “If Maricopa has 2,595,272 voters, why did Maricopa mail just under 4.1 million mail-in ballots?” Backfilling. 📝 Pass the SAVE Act. Election Day is not election week, election month, or election year.

🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

186,156 次观看 • 6 个月前

Here it is: The single most damning piece of evidence of election treachery in the entire Arizona 2020 election: Katie Hobbs manufactured 163,266 mail-in ballots one month after the November 3, 2020, election. “During the period when they needed extra time to count—which is now something they do in every election (they didn’t do it before; it’s new since 2020, and now they do it every time)—they picked up (i.e., manufactured) 163,266 ballots that never existed. Now, how do you pick up ballots that never existed? How do ballots get into the system one month after the election—after the fact—when you can’t prove they were in the system before the fact?” 📝 Katie Hobbs sent out 1.5 million additional mail-in ballots. “If Maricopa has 2,595,272 voters, why did Maricopa mail just under 4.1 million mail-in ballots?” Backfilling. 📝 Pass the SAVE Act. Election Day is not election week, election month, or election year.

Here it is: The single most damning piece of evidence of election treachery in the entire Arizona 2020 election: Katie Hobbs manufactured 163,266 mail-in ballots one month after the November 3, 2020, election. “During the period when they needed extra time to count—which is now something they do in every election (they didn’t do it before; it’s new since 2020, and now they do it every time)—they picked up (i.e., manufactured) 163,266 ballots that never existed. Now, how do you pick up ballots that never existed? How do ballots get into the system one month after the election—after the fact—when you can’t prove they were in the system before the fact?” 📝 Katie Hobbs sent out 1.5 million additional mail-in ballots. “If Maricopa has 2,595,272 voters, why did Maricopa mail just under 4.1 million mail-in ballots?” Backfilling. 📝 Pass the SAVE Act. Election Day is not election week, election month, or election year.

🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

65,181 次观看 • 3 个月前

1) FBI Director Kash Patel confirms China rigged the 2020 election with fake mail in ballots 2) Gavin Newsom flys to Beijing after the election was rigged to announce a China-California partnership 3) US Congress flys to China after the election was rigged to pledge money to the Chinese economy and to make sure Chinese companies can better compete in America They all knew. This is why they didn’t ever investigate the election, they were are all in on it. All their actions with China after the election was rigged make sense

1) FBI Director Kash Patel confirms China rigged the 2020 election with fake mail in ballots 2) Gavin Newsom flys to Beijing after the election was rigged to announce a China-California partnership 3) US Congress flys to China after the election was rigged to pledge money to the Chinese economy and to make sure Chinese companies can better compete in America They all knew. This is why they didn’t ever investigate the election, they were are all in on it. All their actions with China after the election was rigged make sense

Wall Street Apes

1,016,321 次观看 • 1 年前

18 states count ballots that arrive AFTER Election Day! It is unlawful, invites fraud, and obviously undermines voter confidence in election outcomes. Judicial Watch ⚖️ battling in courts now!

18 states count ballots that arrive AFTER Election Day! It is unlawful, invites fraud, and obviously undermines voter confidence in election outcomes. Judicial Watch ⚖️ battling in courts now!

Tom Fitton

92,690 次观看 • 1 年前

The law requires an "Election Day," not an "Election Week." or "Election Month" -- counting ballots that arrive days and weeks after Election Day beyond the date set by Congress is illegal, violates the civil rights of voters, and encourages fraud! Illinois counts ballots that arrive up to 14 DAYS after Election Day, even without a postmark. Heavy lifting Judicial Watch ⚖️ has an appellate argument this week our legal challenge to this law....

The law requires an "Election Day," not an "Election Week." or "Election Month" -- counting ballots that arrive days and weeks after Election Day beyond the date set by Congress is illegal, violates the civil rights of voters, and encourages fraud! Illinois counts ballots that arrive up to 14 DAYS after Election Day, even without a postmark. Heavy lifting Judicial Watch ⚖️ has an appellate argument this week our legal challenge to this law....

Tom Fitton

388,293 次观看 • 2 年前

Election integrity is one of the top priorities of DOJ Civil Rights Division. Some states threaten this integrity by not requiring postmarks on mail in ballots. U.S. Department of Justice urged SCOTUS to require election ballots to be received by Election DAY.

Election integrity is one of the top priorities of DOJ Civil Rights Division. Some states threaten this integrity by not requiring postmarks on mail in ballots. U.S. Department of Justice urged SCOTUS to require election ballots to be received by Election DAY.

AAGHarmeetDhillon

69,881 次观看 • 5 个月前

Inside the courtroom as the Supreme Court considers late-arriving mail-in ballot laws in case that may affect midterms. Judges make valid points about potential fraud, especially after what the country witnessed in the 2020 election. Mail-in ballots should NOT be allowed to come in for days or weeks after election day as this opens up the door to potential fraud on top of the numerous election issues and fraud that is already occurring throughout the country. This is why it's called "Election Day," not "Election Week."

Inside the courtroom as the Supreme Court considers late-arriving mail-in ballot laws in case that may affect midterms. Judges make valid points about potential fraud, especially after what the country witnessed in the 2020 election. Mail-in ballots should NOT be allowed to come in for days or weeks after election day as this opens up the door to potential fraud on top of the numerous election issues and fraud that is already occurring throughout the country. This is why it's called "Election Day," not "Election Week."

The SCIF

32,179 次观看 • 5 个月前

What's happening in California is insane! Elections need to end on Election Day. That's why the RNC has fought all the way to the Supreme Court to stop states from counting ballots received days and weeks after an election.

What's happening in California is insane! Elections need to end on Election Day. That's why the RNC has fought all the way to the Supreme Court to stop states from counting ballots received days and weeks after an election.

RNC Election Integrity

111,686 次观看 • 2 个月前

Democrats were caught still collecting and counting mail-in ballots on Nov 5th in California during the 2020 election. Coincidentally, this same method of counting mail-in ballots after election day until you win seems to be happening AGAIN in the California 2026 election.

Democrats were caught still collecting and counting mail-in ballots on Nov 5th in California during the 2020 election. Coincidentally, this same method of counting mail-in ballots after election day until you win seems to be happening AGAIN in the California 2026 election.

The SCIF

86,415 次观看 • 2 个月前

DEVELOPING: The U.S. Supreme Court appears likely to STRIKE down state laws that allow mail-in ballots to be COUNTED up to 5 days after Election Day. Shannon Bream: “This stems from a Mississippi law that says you can get ballots counted up to 5 business days after election day. If those ballots are postmarked by Election Day.” “The RNC is challenging this.” “29 states have some kind of grace period after Election Day. So the implications of this issue could be widespread heading into the midterms.”

DEVELOPING: The U.S. Supreme Court appears likely to STRIKE down state laws that allow mail-in ballots to be COUNTED up to 5 days after Election Day. Shannon Bream: “This stems from a Mississippi law that says you can get ballots counted up to 5 business days after election day. If those ballots are postmarked by Election Day.” “The RNC is challenging this.” “29 states have some kind of grace period after Election Day. So the implications of this issue could be widespread heading into the midterms.”

RedWave Press

17,480 次观看 • 5 个月前

For five years, Judicial Watch has fought states that allow ballots to arrive days and weeks after Election Day. This banana republic practice creates post-election confusion. We head to the Supreme Court on March 23 to defend our Fifth Circuit victory: ballots received up to 5 days after Election Day are unlawful.

For five years, Judicial Watch has fought states that allow ballots to arrive days and weeks after Election Day. This banana republic practice creates post-election confusion. We head to the Supreme Court on March 23 to defend our Fifth Circuit victory: ballots received up to 5 days after Election Day are unlawful.

Judicial Watch ⚖️

43,291 次观看 • 6 个月前

BREAKING: The Supreme Court rejects a Republican-led challenge to counting some mail-in ballots that arrive after Election Day. In a 5-4 decision, the Court ruled that states can continue counting ballots received after Election Day if state law allows it and the ballots meet requirements, including being postmarked on time. Justice Amy Coney Barrett wrote the majority opinion, joined by Chief Justice Roberts and the Court's three liberal justices. Justice Samuel Alito dissented, calling the ruling inconsistent with federal election law and "two centuries of historical practice." | Shannon Bream America's Newsroom

BREAKING: The Supreme Court rejects a Republican-led challenge to counting some mail-in ballots that arrive after Election Day. In a 5-4 decision, the Court ruled that states can continue counting ballots received after Election Day if state law allows it and the ballots meet requirements, including being postmarked on time. Justice Amy Coney Barrett wrote the majority opinion, joined by Chief Justice Roberts and the Court's three liberal justices. Justice Samuel Alito dissented, calling the ruling inconsistent with federal election law and "two centuries of historical practice." | Shannon Bream America's Newsroom

Fox News

1,023,434 次观看 • 1 个月前

ELECTION LAW BATTLE IN SUPREME COURT! Judicial Watch argued before the Supreme Court of the United States in a historic case filed on behalf of Congressman Mike Bost and two presidential electors, who were before the court to vindicate their standing to challenge an Illinois law allowing the counting of ballots received up to 14 days after Election Day.

ELECTION LAW BATTLE IN SUPREME COURT! Judicial Watch argued before the Supreme Court of the United States in a historic case filed on behalf of Congressman Mike Bost and two presidential electors, who were before the court to vindicate their standing to challenge an Illinois law allowing the counting of ballots received up to 14 days after Election Day.

Judicial Watch ⚖️

66,122 次观看 • 10 个月前