Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

'In this compelling 2010 lecture, David Icke presents his controversial perspective on Zionism, years before the recent conflicts in Gaza. He challenges the mainstream narrative, suggesting layers of influence that shape global events. Icke questions the role of powerful elites, the media’s involvement in shaping perception, and the motivations... behind geopolitical actions. As he peels back the layers, he urges us to question: Who benefits from the narratives we accept? In exploring Gaza well before recent events, he suggests patterns of control and manipulation that echo through time. While controversial, his words prompt us to reflect on how much of what we believe is shaped by forces we rarely see. Let this dive into Icke’s viewpoint leave you wondering—what other narratives might be worth questioning? David Icke argued that Zionism, in his view, is not a religious concept but a political movement tied to global power structures. He often claimed that Zionist elites were part of a hidden network influencing world events, particularly in the Middle East. Icke maintained that media narratives around Gaza and Israel were shaped to conceal deeper geopolitical agendas. He suggested that questioning Zionism was not about religion or ethnicity but about uncovering what he saw as a structure of control. If we’ve accepted one version of events for so long, how much else in our world might be shaped by narratives we’ve never thought to question?' - School of Synchronicity.show more

David Icke

830,367 subscribers

69,622 Aufrufe • vor 16 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Gareth Icke: Manufacturing Consent For Endless War | Wide Awake Media Podcast #20 The latest episode of the Wide Awake Media podcast features truth-teller, activist and Ickonic Media presenter Gareth Icke, in a detailed analysis of information control, global conflict, and the psychological mechanisms shaping public perception. Icke explores how narratives are constructed to trigger emotional responses, arguing that fear and repetition are used to steer public opinion in predictable directions. He contends that wars in the Middle East are not organic conflicts but managed events—used to justify expansion, control populations, and reshape global power structures. The conversation examines narratives surrounding Israel, Iran, and the October 7 attacks, questioning official accounts and highlighting what Icke sees as deliberate manipulation of public opinion. He also criticises Donald Trump, accusing him of ultimately serving the same system he claims to oppose. Pointing to the growing unpopularity of conflict with Iran, Icke warns of the increasing likelihood of major false flag events designed to shift public support in favour of escalation. Despite this, he emphasises the importance of individual responsibility, truth-telling, and rebuilding real-world communities as the foundation for resistance.

Gareth Icke: Manufacturing Consent For Endless War | Wide Awake Media Podcast #20 The latest episode of the Wide Awake Media podcast features truth-teller, activist and Ickonic Media presenter Gareth Icke, in a detailed analysis of information control, global conflict, and the psychological mechanisms shaping public perception. Icke explores how narratives are constructed to trigger emotional responses, arguing that fear and repetition are used to steer public opinion in predictable directions. He contends that wars in the Middle East are not organic conflicts but managed events—used to justify expansion, control populations, and reshape global power structures. The conversation examines narratives surrounding Israel, Iran, and the October 7 attacks, questioning official accounts and highlighting what Icke sees as deliberate manipulation of public opinion. He also criticises Donald Trump, accusing him of ultimately serving the same system he claims to oppose. Pointing to the growing unpopularity of conflict with Iran, Icke warns of the increasing likelihood of major false flag events designed to shift public support in favour of escalation. Despite this, he emphasises the importance of individual responsibility, truth-telling, and rebuilding real-world communities as the foundation for resistance.

Wide Awake Media

54,407 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Judaism is never Zionism. Judaism is a religion and Zionism is a political ideology that has nothing to do with Judaism. How can being against Zionism count as being against Jews or Judaism? Zionism is a political ideology created a century ago by Zionist leaders who did not even believe in Judaism. The mainstream media, which is under the control of the Zionists, constantly lies to you as if all Jews are on the side of Israel, but this is a big lie. Thousands of Torah Jews in the world are against Israel and Zionism. Rabbi Chaim Brisker, one of the greatest rabbis a century ago, once said: “There have been many heretical groups in Jewish history, but Zionism is the worst. Being against Zionism is never Antisemitism. Criticizing Israel is never antisemitism. Zionism is not Judaism. Israel is not a Jewish state. There are thousands of anti-Zionist, anti-Israel Jews in the world, and now you claim that Jews are the enemies of Judaism.

Judaism is never Zionism. Judaism is a religion and Zionism is a political ideology that has nothing to do with Judaism. How can being against Zionism count as being against Jews or Judaism? Zionism is a political ideology created a century ago by Zionist leaders who did not even believe in Judaism. The mainstream media, which is under the control of the Zionists, constantly lies to you as if all Jews are on the side of Israel, but this is a big lie. Thousands of Torah Jews in the world are against Israel and Zionism. Rabbi Chaim Brisker, one of the greatest rabbis a century ago, once said: “There have been many heretical groups in Jewish history, but Zionism is the worst. Being against Zionism is never Antisemitism. Criticizing Israel is never antisemitism. Zionism is not Judaism. Israel is not a Jewish state. There are thousands of anti-Zionist, anti-Israel Jews in the world, and now you claim that Jews are the enemies of Judaism.

Voice of Rabbis

381,397 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Judaism is never Zionism. Judaism is a religion and Zionism is a political ideology that has nothing to do with Judaism. How can being against Zionism count as being against Jews or Judaism? Zionism is a political ideology created a century ago by Zionist leaders who did not even believe in Judaism. The mainstream media, which is under the control of the Zionists, constantly lies to you as if all Jews are on the side of Israel, but this is a big lie. Thousands of Torah Jews in the world are against Israel and Zionism. Rabbi Chaim Brisker, one of the greatest rabbis a century ago, once said: “There have been many heretical groups in Jewish history, but Zionism is the worst. Being against Zionism is never Antisemitism. Criticizing Israel is never antisemitism. Zionism is not Judaism. Israel is not a Jewish state. There are thousands of anti-Zionist, anti-Israel Jews in the world, and now you claim that Jews are the enemies of Judaism.

Judaism is never Zionism. Judaism is a religion and Zionism is a political ideology that has nothing to do with Judaism. How can being against Zionism count as being against Jews or Judaism? Zionism is a political ideology created a century ago by Zionist leaders who did not even believe in Judaism. The mainstream media, which is under the control of the Zionists, constantly lies to you as if all Jews are on the side of Israel, but this is a big lie. Thousands of Torah Jews in the world are against Israel and Zionism. Rabbi Chaim Brisker, one of the greatest rabbis a century ago, once said: “There have been many heretical groups in Jewish history, but Zionism is the worst. Being against Zionism is never Antisemitism. Criticizing Israel is never antisemitism. Zionism is not Judaism. Israel is not a Jewish state. There are thousands of anti-Zionist, anti-Israel Jews in the world, and now you claim that Jews are the enemies of Judaism.

Voice of Rabbis

38,263 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Who Do You Think The 3rd Person Is? Bill Gates? Klaus Schwab? Someone Else? “Nostradamus saw in his future three men that he called antichrists. One was Napoleon, the second one was Hitler, and the third one is the one that is to come, who is said to be the worst of all, because he will learn from the mistakes of the others. A very dangerous person. He didn't like the term antichrist. He said it was a Christian term, and it was not exactly what he meant. But he said, if you think of Christ as representing people, humanity, then antichrist is someone who does terrible things against humanity, against people. And it can be the type of personality like Genghis Khan or Attila the Hun, the type that doesn't care anything about what it's doing, it only wants power. So this is what he meant by an Antichrist. But the third one, he gave us a great deal of information about him because he wanted us to do something to stop the man. He said in the Bible, in the book of Revelation and other books in the Old Testament, the people saw the same things that he saw their symbolism they could understand in their time, but they all saw the same thing. And the man he refers to as the Antichrist is the number 666 in the Book of Revelation, called the Beast. Of course he said 666 also refers to his connection to his computers. So there's a lot more to it. But he has been predicted as far back as Bible times. So he said he has a destiny to fulfill. He has to come, but after he comes, what happens after that is in the hands of mankind. Do we allow it to go through the worst case scenarios or can we lessen it? That's the point fulfill. We were given a lot of information about this man because he is so important. We have his horoscope. He was born on February the 4th, 1962 in Jerusalem, but he's not Jewish. And his parents were killed during the Israeli war and when he was about six or seven years old, and he was raised by his uncle. His uncle is a very evil man, and we have had many people see him, and we have in my work, and we had one woman who was able to put together a police composite picture of the uncle and of the antichrist. She was a psychic who had worked with police on many cases, so she knew how to do the police composite kits. But the uncle took the young boy him as his own. What the young boy doesn't know was that the uncle had his parents killed, so he could have him for himself. And he has gotten together a very powerful group of rich Arabs in the Middle East, and they've been taking care of this young boy and grooming him for the role he is to take. It's a very powerful group of people that control everything that happens in the Middle East. They're the puppet masters behind the scenes. Nusrat Dhamma said, by the time seven puppets arise in the Middle East, you will realize what is happening that they are not the real leaders of the countries, but they are the puppets being manipulated by the puppet masters behind the scenes. The young Antichrist went to college in Egypt, and we were working on this at the same time he was in college, so we were shown several scenes of him in college. We knew where he was living. We had all this information.”

Who Do You Think The 3rd Person Is? Bill Gates? Klaus Schwab? Someone Else? “Nostradamus saw in his future three men that he called antichrists. One was Napoleon, the second one was Hitler, and the third one is the one that is to come, who is said to be the worst of all, because he will learn from the mistakes of the others. A very dangerous person. He didn't like the term antichrist. He said it was a Christian term, and it was not exactly what he meant. But he said, if you think of Christ as representing people, humanity, then antichrist is someone who does terrible things against humanity, against people. And it can be the type of personality like Genghis Khan or Attila the Hun, the type that doesn't care anything about what it's doing, it only wants power. So this is what he meant by an Antichrist. But the third one, he gave us a great deal of information about him because he wanted us to do something to stop the man. He said in the Bible, in the book of Revelation and other books in the Old Testament, the people saw the same things that he saw their symbolism they could understand in their time, but they all saw the same thing. And the man he refers to as the Antichrist is the number 666 in the Book of Revelation, called the Beast. Of course he said 666 also refers to his connection to his computers. So there's a lot more to it. But he has been predicted as far back as Bible times. So he said he has a destiny to fulfill. He has to come, but after he comes, what happens after that is in the hands of mankind. Do we allow it to go through the worst case scenarios or can we lessen it? That's the point fulfill. We were given a lot of information about this man because he is so important. We have his horoscope. He was born on February the 4th, 1962 in Jerusalem, but he's not Jewish. And his parents were killed during the Israeli war and when he was about six or seven years old, and he was raised by his uncle. His uncle is a very evil man, and we have had many people see him, and we have in my work, and we had one woman who was able to put together a police composite picture of the uncle and of the antichrist. She was a psychic who had worked with police on many cases, so she knew how to do the police composite kits. But the uncle took the young boy him as his own. What the young boy doesn't know was that the uncle had his parents killed, so he could have him for himself. And he has gotten together a very powerful group of rich Arabs in the Middle East, and they've been taking care of this young boy and grooming him for the role he is to take. It's a very powerful group of people that control everything that happens in the Middle East. They're the puppet masters behind the scenes. Nusrat Dhamma said, by the time seven puppets arise in the Middle East, you will realize what is happening that they are not the real leaders of the countries, but they are the puppets being manipulated by the puppet masters behind the scenes. The young Antichrist went to college in Egypt, and we were working on this at the same time he was in college, so we were shown several scenes of him in college. We knew where he was living. We had all this information.”

Wall Street Apes

1,338,694 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

After a medical accident in infancy, David Reimer’s parents were advised to raise him as a girl and he underwent surgery. He grew up as “Brenda,” but never felt comfortable in that role. As a teenager, he learned the truth and chose to live as male again. His story became one of the most discussed cases in psychology and medical ethics. It raises difficult questions about identity, consent, and how much of who we are can be shaped by others. What do you think this case teaches us about how gender, psychology, and medical decisions should be handled?

After a medical accident in infancy, David Reimer’s parents were advised to raise him as a girl and he underwent surgery. He grew up as “Brenda,” but never felt comfortable in that role. As a teenager, he learned the truth and chose to live as male again. His story became one of the most discussed cases in psychology and medical ethics. It raises difficult questions about identity, consent, and how much of who we are can be shaped by others. What do you think this case teaches us about how gender, psychology, and medical decisions should be handled?

TheRealCherokeeOwl 🦉

25,551 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Michael Jackson wasn't just the King of Pop, he was a beautiful soul the world never fully understood while he was here. Behind the music, the records, and the global tame was a man who gave endlessly, loved deeply, and used his voice to speak on injustice, pain, and humanity. Yet while he lived, the media often chose a different narrative. Instead of honoring his genius and his heart, they picked him apart, mocked him, and pushed stories that shaped public perception in ways that still linger today. It's one of the greatest contradictions of our time, how someone who brought so much light was surrounded by so much darkness in the public eye. In The Crucifixion of Michael Jackson, the Honorable Minister Louis Farrakhan breaks this down with clarity and depth. He speaks to the spirit of our brother Michael, not just the superstar, but the man. A man who stood for truth, who challenged power in his own way, and who carried a level of purity that this world often misunderstands and, at times, attacks. Now, as the world prepares to revisit his life through a new film, we have a responsibility. Not to recycle the same narratives that once tried to tear him down, but to celebrate him properly. To honor the music, yes, but more importantly, to honor the message, the compassion, and the courage he carried. Michael Jackson gave us more than entertainment. He gave us reflection. Songs like They Don't Care About Us weren't just records, they were statements. He wasn't afraid to speak on oppression, suffering, and injustice, even when it came at a cost.

Michael Jackson wasn't just the King of Pop, he was a beautiful soul the world never fully understood while he was here. Behind the music, the records, and the global tame was a man who gave endlessly, loved deeply, and used his voice to speak on injustice, pain, and humanity. Yet while he lived, the media often chose a different narrative. Instead of honoring his genius and his heart, they picked him apart, mocked him, and pushed stories that shaped public perception in ways that still linger today. It's one of the greatest contradictions of our time, how someone who brought so much light was surrounded by so much darkness in the public eye. In The Crucifixion of Michael Jackson, the Honorable Minister Louis Farrakhan breaks this down with clarity and depth. He speaks to the spirit of our brother Michael, not just the superstar, but the man. A man who stood for truth, who challenged power in his own way, and who carried a level of purity that this world often misunderstands and, at times, attacks. Now, as the world prepares to revisit his life through a new film, we have a responsibility. Not to recycle the same narratives that once tried to tear him down, but to celebrate him properly. To honor the music, yes, but more importantly, to honor the message, the compassion, and the courage he carried. Michael Jackson gave us more than entertainment. He gave us reflection. Songs like They Don't Care About Us weren't just records, they were statements. He wasn't afraid to speak on oppression, suffering, and injustice, even when it came at a cost.

TOUGHBOI9.

14,332 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Anti-Zionism is NOT Antisemitism. Zionism is not Judaism. Israel is not the state of the Jews. Although we believe that this evil state of Israel will continue its crimes against innocent people, our brothers in Lebanon and Palestine should not forget that there is a Lord of the universe and He is under His control; According to the Torah, this evil state will eventually disappear. Let's pray together to God that He will show us the end of this state soon in our days.

Anti-Zionism is NOT Antisemitism. Zionism is not Judaism. Israel is not the state of the Jews. Although we believe that this evil state of Israel will continue its crimes against innocent people, our brothers in Lebanon and Palestine should not forget that there is a Lord of the universe and He is under His control; According to the Torah, this evil state will eventually disappear. Let's pray together to God that He will show us the end of this state soon in our days.

Voice of Rabbis

49,289 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Bret Weinstein raises a question that’s hard to shake. He points out the obvious “pay for play” system in American politics — lobbying that lets corporations and special interests nudge decisions in directions that often harm public health and long-term stability. Then he goes further: foreign adversaries (and even allies) have surely noticed this vulnerability and are likely exploiting it too. But he suspects that’s not the full picture. The Epstein case, in his view, points to something deeper — a hidden leverage structure, possibly tied to intelligence services, that exerts undeclared influence on leaders and policy. When government actions stop making sense on the surface, it feels like there’s an unseen gravitational force at work. Weinstein admits he doesn’t enjoy raising this, but says the central question remains: what exactly is driving the system, how does the hidden part operate, and how much control does it really have? It leaves you wondering how much of what we see in politics is truly what it appears to be. What do you make of the idea that there might be layers of influence operating behind the visible lobbying and official channels?

Bret Weinstein raises a question that’s hard to shake. He points out the obvious “pay for play” system in American politics — lobbying that lets corporations and special interests nudge decisions in directions that often harm public health and long-term stability. Then he goes further: foreign adversaries (and even allies) have surely noticed this vulnerability and are likely exploiting it too. But he suspects that’s not the full picture. The Epstein case, in his view, points to something deeper — a hidden leverage structure, possibly tied to intelligence services, that exerts undeclared influence on leaders and policy. When government actions stop making sense on the surface, it feels like there’s an unseen gravitational force at work. Weinstein admits he doesn’t enjoy raising this, but says the central question remains: what exactly is driving the system, how does the hidden part operate, and how much control does it really have? It leaves you wondering how much of what we see in politics is truly what it appears to be. What do you make of the idea that there might be layers of influence operating behind the visible lobbying and official channels?

Camus

19,198 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Probably these 2 videos were recorded before Thiru K.Annamalai joined BJP. What he mentioned about North Indians recently is not something new. He had a different viewpoint on North-South divide as his conviction. In this video he says that Patanjali is from Tamil Nadu which could be right and then adds that the Yogasutra that he authored was taken by North Indians and given as Shastras by them to Tamil people. In effect he goes on to say that North Indians have corrupted the society by bringing caste divisions which never existed in the southern part of our country. He also goes on to say that the people from North claimed ownership of Patanjali. Truth: Patanjali could be from southern part but he did write his works in Sanskrit & not in any other language. Patanjali is a national treasure & I would even go on to say that he is a Global Asset for what he preached is practiced in different parts of the world. Probably we were fooled by his nationalistic rhetoric which is not his fault. Navika Kumar Rahul Shivshankar Anand Narasimhan🇮🇳 Padmaja Joshi

Probably these 2 videos were recorded before Thiru K.Annamalai joined BJP. What he mentioned about North Indians recently is not something new. He had a different viewpoint on North-South divide as his conviction. In this video he says that Patanjali is from Tamil Nadu which could be right and then adds that the Yogasutra that he authored was taken by North Indians and given as Shastras by them to Tamil people. In effect he goes on to say that North Indians have corrupted the society by bringing caste divisions which never existed in the southern part of our country. He also goes on to say that the people from North claimed ownership of Patanjali. Truth: Patanjali could be from southern part but he did write his works in Sanskrit & not in any other language. Patanjali is a national treasure & I would even go on to say that he is a Global Asset for what he preached is practiced in different parts of the world. Probably we were fooled by his nationalistic rhetoric which is not his fault. Navika Kumar Rahul Shivshankar Anand Narasimhan🇮🇳 Padmaja Joshi

JVC Sreeram (Bulls Eye)

53,686 Aufrufe • vor 23 Tagen

At a Q&A, John MacArthur is asked about Christian nationalism. The kingdom of God is not of this world. Jesus said that. He said, “My kingdom is not of this world. If My kingdom were of this world, My servants would [fight].” His kingdom is not of this world. The kingdom of this world is a separate world; they’re not linked together. Let me say it another way: Nothing that happens in any nation, whether it’s a Communist nation, a Muslim nation, or a “quasi-Christian” nation, or an atheistic nation—nothing in that nation politically, socially has anything to do with the advancement of the kingdom of God, because the kingdom of God is separate from that system. God, in His sovereignty, is building His church, “and the gates of Hades will not prevail against it,” Jesus said. So the idea that you should link up some political effort, some political process, some social process, some gain of power or influence in a culture as part of the advance of Christianity is alien to Christianity. You never have our Lord approaching anything like that, nor the apostles, and particularly the apostle Paul. He sought to gain no favor with the Roman Empire whatsoever, or for that matter, with any other of the rulers that he ran into during his life. Now, that is not to say that we are indifferent to what happens in the nation. We’ve been talking about that the last couple of Sunday mornings. We have to be the people who uphold righteousness. When we come to vote, we want to vote for that which is the most righteous option. Obviously, we can’t vote in righteousness, but we have to vote in a way that reflects our commitment to the righteousness of God. So we couldn’t possibly elect somebody who was an abortionist, somebody who was LGBTQ or LGBTQ-affirming, or any other deviation from God’s righteous moral standard. So it gets harder, doesn’t it, nowadays, because even sometimes when politicians are more conservative and anti-abortion, they may be sinful and wicked in some other categories, and it’s very hard to find out who is really honest and who is simply dishonest and seeking power. But in the end, we do what we can with the understanding that the responsibility of the church is not to advance the kingdom of this world. That’s a faulty viewpoint. Christian nationalism is usually tied to what is called post-millennialism, and that is the view that the church, somehow, by influencing the culture, can bring in the kingdom of Christ. In other words, it’s the idea not that Christ returns and sets up His kingdom, but that the church establishes His kingdom and then hands it to Him. That is not what Scripture teaches. What Scripture teaches is what we’re learning from the book of Revelation. Things are going to get worse and worse and worse. And the end of human history is not the church triumphant, reigning in the world and taking over the structures of human kingdoms; that’s not what happens. At the end of human history, the believers are persecuted and murdered, and that’s the very opposite of what Christian nationalism would anticipate. So we believe the Bible teaches that things get worse and worse, headed toward the wrath of God, which we’re seeing in Revelation, and then our Lord returns, Himself, to establish His kingdom is clearly what we read in the book of Revelation. OK?

At a Q&A, John MacArthur is asked about Christian nationalism. The kingdom of God is not of this world. Jesus said that. He said, “My kingdom is not of this world. If My kingdom were of this world, My servants would [fight].” His kingdom is not of this world. The kingdom of this world is a separate world; they’re not linked together. Let me say it another way: Nothing that happens in any nation, whether it’s a Communist nation, a Muslim nation, or a “quasi-Christian” nation, or an atheistic nation—nothing in that nation politically, socially has anything to do with the advancement of the kingdom of God, because the kingdom of God is separate from that system. God, in His sovereignty, is building His church, “and the gates of Hades will not prevail against it,” Jesus said. So the idea that you should link up some political effort, some political process, some social process, some gain of power or influence in a culture as part of the advance of Christianity is alien to Christianity. You never have our Lord approaching anything like that, nor the apostles, and particularly the apostle Paul. He sought to gain no favor with the Roman Empire whatsoever, or for that matter, with any other of the rulers that he ran into during his life. Now, that is not to say that we are indifferent to what happens in the nation. We’ve been talking about that the last couple of Sunday mornings. We have to be the people who uphold righteousness. When we come to vote, we want to vote for that which is the most righteous option. Obviously, we can’t vote in righteousness, but we have to vote in a way that reflects our commitment to the righteousness of God. So we couldn’t possibly elect somebody who was an abortionist, somebody who was LGBTQ or LGBTQ-affirming, or any other deviation from God’s righteous moral standard. So it gets harder, doesn’t it, nowadays, because even sometimes when politicians are more conservative and anti-abortion, they may be sinful and wicked in some other categories, and it’s very hard to find out who is really honest and who is simply dishonest and seeking power. But in the end, we do what we can with the understanding that the responsibility of the church is not to advance the kingdom of this world. That’s a faulty viewpoint. Christian nationalism is usually tied to what is called post-millennialism, and that is the view that the church, somehow, by influencing the culture, can bring in the kingdom of Christ. In other words, it’s the idea not that Christ returns and sets up His kingdom, but that the church establishes His kingdom and then hands it to Him. That is not what Scripture teaches. What Scripture teaches is what we’re learning from the book of Revelation. Things are going to get worse and worse and worse. And the end of human history is not the church triumphant, reigning in the world and taking over the structures of human kingdoms; that’s not what happens. At the end of human history, the believers are persecuted and murdered, and that’s the very opposite of what Christian nationalism would anticipate. So we believe the Bible teaches that things get worse and worse, headed toward the wrath of God, which we’re seeing in Revelation, and then our Lord returns, Himself, to establish His kingdom is clearly what we read in the book of Revelation. OK?

Terri Green

12,152 Aufrufe • vor 10 Tagen

WATCH: CNN’s John Miller mentions the video and notes left behind by the alleged Minneapolis Catholic church shooter, citing their mental illness and the working motive is “he was in pain,” but NOTHING about the shooter being transgender and that they hated Christians, Jews, and Trump... Well, we’ve been looking into the shooter who law enforcement sources have identified as Robin Westman and police have been examining some of the postings online by an individual of the same name, presumed to be the same individual. It shows numerous weapons, magazines, things in preparation for the shooting along with a book and different notes. But one of them is particularly telling in that it says: ‘I have waited for this for so long. I am not well. I am not right. I am a sad person, haunted by these thoughts that do not go away. I know this is wrong’ and he goes on to describe that the action he is going to take against this world before taking his own life — which is not uncommon in these incidents, these active shooter scenarios where you see someone who reports to be in — in — in pain and trauma and that they write all of this out and leave it behind with the foreknowledge that what they're about to do is going to end their own life as well, while taking these — these strangers, these innocent people with them in the process. But investigators are going back through this material and a lot of other material trying to determine motive. So what do we know? I mean, what we know, if this in fact is from the shooter, that his motive was he was in pain. But what we don't see here and there's more to go through is what was, what was the shooter — Robin Westman in pain about specifically?”

WATCH: CNN’s John Miller mentions the video and notes left behind by the alleged Minneapolis Catholic church shooter, citing their mental illness and the working motive is “he was in pain,” but NOTHING about the shooter being transgender and that they hated Christians, Jews, and Trump... Well, we’ve been looking into the shooter who law enforcement sources have identified as Robin Westman and police have been examining some of the postings online by an individual of the same name, presumed to be the same individual. It shows numerous weapons, magazines, things in preparation for the shooting along with a book and different notes. But one of them is particularly telling in that it says: ‘I have waited for this for so long. I am not well. I am not right. I am a sad person, haunted by these thoughts that do not go away. I know this is wrong’ and he goes on to describe that the action he is going to take against this world before taking his own life — which is not uncommon in these incidents, these active shooter scenarios where you see someone who reports to be in — in — in pain and trauma and that they write all of this out and leave it behind with the foreknowledge that what they're about to do is going to end their own life as well, while taking these — these strangers, these innocent people with them in the process. But investigators are going back through this material and a lot of other material trying to determine motive. So what do we know? I mean, what we know, if this in fact is from the shooter, that his motive was he was in pain. But what we don't see here and there's more to go through is what was, what was the shooter — Robin Westman in pain about specifically?”

Curtis Houck

64,113 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Mark Zuckerberg on Elon Musk’s acquisition of Twitter Elon Musk famously reduced head count by 80% after acquiring Twitter. It was controversial at the time, but Mark is asked what he thinks Elon did well during it. Mark responds: “You can agree or disagree with the exact tactics and how he did that. Every leader has their own style… But a lot of the specific principles that he pushed on: making the organization more technical, decreasing distance between engineers at the company and him, fewer layers of management. I think that those were generally good changes.” Mark also believes this was good for the technology industry as a whole: “My sense is that there were a lot of other people who thought that those were good changes, but who may have been a little shy about doing them. Just in my conversations with other founders and how people have reacted to the things we’ve done… When people see what Elon is doing, I think that gives people the ability to think through how to shape their organizations in a way that can be good for the industry and make all these companies more productive over time.” He continues: “So I think that was one thing where he was quite ahead of a bunch of the other companies on… And from the outside, it’s very hard to know. Did he cut too much? Did he not cut enough? I don’t think it’s my place to opine on that… But certainly his actions led me and, I think, a lot of other folks in the industry to think about, ‘Hey, are we doing this as much as we should? Could we make our companies better by pushing on some of these same principles?’” Video source: Lex Fridman (2023)

Mark Zuckerberg on Elon Musk’s acquisition of Twitter Elon Musk famously reduced head count by 80% after acquiring Twitter. It was controversial at the time, but Mark is asked what he thinks Elon did well during it. Mark responds: “You can agree or disagree with the exact tactics and how he did that. Every leader has their own style… But a lot of the specific principles that he pushed on: making the organization more technical, decreasing distance between engineers at the company and him, fewer layers of management. I think that those were generally good changes.” Mark also believes this was good for the technology industry as a whole: “My sense is that there were a lot of other people who thought that those were good changes, but who may have been a little shy about doing them. Just in my conversations with other founders and how people have reacted to the things we’ve done… When people see what Elon is doing, I think that gives people the ability to think through how to shape their organizations in a way that can be good for the industry and make all these companies more productive over time.” He continues: “So I think that was one thing where he was quite ahead of a bunch of the other companies on… And from the outside, it’s very hard to know. Did he cut too much? Did he not cut enough? I don’t think it’s my place to opine on that… But certainly his actions led me and, I think, a lot of other folks in the industry to think about, ‘Hey, are we doing this as much as we should? Could we make our companies better by pushing on some of these same principles?’” Video source: Lex Fridman (2023)

Startup Archive

522,371 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

People were cheering as workers prepare to remove Trump’s name from the Kennedy Center. What is remarkable is how much goodwill he enjoyed when he returned to the presidency and how quickly he has managed to squander it. He is now unpopular even in communities that voted for him, a reflection of what many see as a deeply disappointing presidency. Instead of focusing on the issues that matter to ordinary Americans, he has spent much of his time embroiled in controversies, accusations of corruption, and allegations that he has used the power of the American state to benefit himself and his family. What a disgrace.

People were cheering as workers prepare to remove Trump’s name from the Kennedy Center. What is remarkable is how much goodwill he enjoyed when he returned to the presidency and how quickly he has managed to squander it. He is now unpopular even in communities that voted for him, a reflection of what many see as a deeply disappointing presidency. Instead of focusing on the issues that matter to ordinary Americans, he has spent much of his time embroiled in controversies, accusations of corruption, and allegations that he has used the power of the American state to benefit himself and his family. What a disgrace.

Hopewell Chin’ono

37,406 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Pastor Rob McCoy sends a strong message to Jimmy Kimmel: Put down the rhetoric. Charlie Kirk was never your enemy, he saw you as his opportunity. “Jimmy, Charlie wasn't your enemy. He looked at you as his opportunity. If you were at one of his tabling events on a campus, he'd bring you to the front of the line. He believed in dialogue and the freedom of speech and logos, and he wanted to dialogue with you. He was never your enemy.” “Your ideology was his enemy. But he saw you created in the image of God, that you were fearfully and wonderfully made, were created equal, not in capacity, but in dignity. And he would honor you and he would dignify you. And I think all of us would do well to do that for each other in this season. Just put down the rhetoric.”

Pastor Rob McCoy sends a strong message to Jimmy Kimmel: Put down the rhetoric. Charlie Kirk was never your enemy, he saw you as his opportunity. “Jimmy, Charlie wasn't your enemy. He looked at you as his opportunity. If you were at one of his tabling events on a campus, he'd bring you to the front of the line. He believed in dialogue and the freedom of speech and logos, and he wanted to dialogue with you. He was never your enemy.” “Your ideology was his enemy. But he saw you created in the image of God, that you were fearfully and wonderfully made, were created equal, not in capacity, but in dignity. And he would honor you and he would dignify you. And I think all of us would do well to do that for each other in this season. Just put down the rhetoric.”

Benny Johnson

206,926 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

VIDEO | Hyderabad, Telangana: Tanvi Kuncha, sister of 28-year-old Anshul Kuncha who was shot dead in US, requests the Ministry of External Affairs to expedite the repatriation of Anshul’s mortal remains. The bereaved sister says, "The only request that I have from the External Ministry of Affairs is to bring back my brother's body as soon as possible. Initially they told us that the body would be brought back by Monday or Tuesday, but now we are getting an estimate of Thursday or Friday and we do not want to keep his body back there for so long. My brother was a very happy, joyous person and the sweetest person that you would ever meet...." She added, "He went to do his masters in Business Analytics in Drexel University, and then he got a full-time job at an MNC. He used to work as a part-time in this pizza delivery shop while he was doing his masters, but only on the weekends. What we know is that he was called to a vacant house and once he delivered the pizzas and was heading back to his vehicle, he was shot in his head from behind."

VIDEO | Hyderabad, Telangana: Tanvi Kuncha, sister of 28-year-old Anshul Kuncha who was shot dead in US, requests the Ministry of External Affairs to expedite the repatriation of Anshul’s mortal remains. The bereaved sister says, "The only request that I have from the External Ministry of Affairs is to bring back my brother's body as soon as possible. Initially they told us that the body would be brought back by Monday or Tuesday, but now we are getting an estimate of Thursday or Friday and we do not want to keep his body back there for so long. My brother was a very happy, joyous person and the sweetest person that you would ever meet...." She added, "He went to do his masters in Business Analytics in Drexel University, and then he got a full-time job at an MNC. He used to work as a part-time in this pizza delivery shop while he was doing his masters, but only on the weekends. What we know is that he was called to a vacant house and once he delivered the pizzas and was heading back to his vehicle, he was shot in his head from behind."

Press Trust of India

104,210 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

This was CHILLING to find out. Before Mao killed millions, he was dedicated to a pagan god. This marked the beginning of a life dedicated to waging war against God and anyone who believes in Him. "The Devil and Communist China" author StevenWMosher warns that this "demigod" mentality is still governing China through Xi Jinping: "Mao's a very interesting character. He at 3 years old was taken to a local stone god and dedicated, consecrated, you might even say baptized and given to the power of that stone god by his mother... He rejected God entirely. He said that other things and people exist in the world, but they're only there for my use and my pleasure… He thought of himself as kind of a demigod. He was the master of the stage and he was going to manipulate people. And he did so all of his life. What we have now is, in Xi Jinping… he's not the biological son of Mao, but he is the cultural, the political, the spiritual son of Mao in a sense that he is mimicking, emulating, copying everything that Mao did."

This was CHILLING to find out. Before Mao killed millions, he was dedicated to a pagan god. This marked the beginning of a life dedicated to waging war against God and anyone who believes in Him. "The Devil and Communist China" author StevenWMosher warns that this "demigod" mentality is still governing China through Xi Jinping: "Mao's a very interesting character. He at 3 years old was taken to a local stone god and dedicated, consecrated, you might even say baptized and given to the power of that stone god by his mother... He rejected God entirely. He said that other things and people exist in the world, but they're only there for my use and my pleasure… He thought of himself as kind of a demigod. He was the master of the stage and he was going to manipulate people. And he did so all of his life. What we have now is, in Xi Jinping… he's not the biological son of Mao, but he is the cultural, the political, the spiritual son of Mao in a sense that he is mimicking, emulating, copying everything that Mao did."

Glenn Beck

85,300 Aufrufe • vor 27 Tagen

MEDIA, NARRATIVES & “PROGRAMMING” Lara Logan is joined by Mike Smith, former Hollywood stuntman, action director, and filmmaker behind the documentaries “Out Of Shadows” and “Into The Light.” In this conversation, Smith shares his perspective on why he believes major media organizations have not given sustained coverage to the latest Epstein file releases. He argues that newsrooms are no longer driven primarily by journalists, but by corporate leadership, funding structures, and narrative control. Referencing themes from “Out Of Shadows,” he revisits his broader argument about cultural influence and what he calls “programming” through television, film, music, and entertainment. Smith questions how information is framed, how public opinion is shaped, and whether truth is determined by evidence or by what the majority accepts. The discussion centers on media power, perception, and how narratives compete in the public arena. EPSTEIN: OUT OF SHADOWS & INTO THE LIGHT | EP. 64 | Going Rogue with Lara Logan Watch the full episode, and Mike Smith’s “Out Of Shadows” & “Into The Light” below. ⬇️ Into The Light Official Movie Crux (Mike Smith) #GoingRogue #EpsteinFiles #MediaNarratives #InvestigativeJournalism #OutOfShadows

MEDIA, NARRATIVES & “PROGRAMMING” Lara Logan is joined by Mike Smith, former Hollywood stuntman, action director, and filmmaker behind the documentaries “Out Of Shadows” and “Into The Light.” In this conversation, Smith shares his perspective on why he believes major media organizations have not given sustained coverage to the latest Epstein file releases. He argues that newsrooms are no longer driven primarily by journalists, but by corporate leadership, funding structures, and narrative control. Referencing themes from “Out Of Shadows,” he revisits his broader argument about cultural influence and what he calls “programming” through television, film, music, and entertainment. Smith questions how information is framed, how public opinion is shaped, and whether truth is determined by evidence or by what the majority accepts. The discussion centers on media power, perception, and how narratives compete in the public arena. EPSTEIN: OUT OF SHADOWS & INTO THE LIGHT | EP. 64 | Going Rogue with Lara Logan Watch the full episode, and Mike Smith’s “Out Of Shadows” & “Into The Light” below. ⬇️ Into The Light Official Movie Crux (Mike Smith) #GoingRogue #EpsteinFiles #MediaNarratives #InvestigativeJournalism #OutOfShadows

Lara Logan

112,520 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

🚨Tapper: WH physician told Biden aides he might have to be in a wheelchair if he fell again: "President Biden's deterioration of his spine, the degeneration was so significant that if he fell one more time, that he might have to be in a wheelchair and serve in a wheelchair, for his second term. But everybody pushed off the notion that he use a wheelchair until after the election." "This is all part of a larger whole where the Biden White House tried to hide the extent of his deterioration, both physical and cognitive, as much as possible." "In fact, as you we all know, we all saw as his shuffling gait got worse and worse from 2003 to 2004 (2023 to 2024). They started putting aides around him as he walked to Marine One, the helicopter, that was to kind of hide from public view how bad his gait was, how bad his walking was, his shuffling, and also in case he stumbled again to make sure somebody was there." "And this is just a piece of an overall campaign to try to conceal from the American people the extent to which the president was really struggling to do his job."

🚨Tapper: WH physician told Biden aides he might have to be in a wheelchair if he fell again: "President Biden's deterioration of his spine, the degeneration was so significant that if he fell one more time, that he might have to be in a wheelchair and serve in a wheelchair, for his second term. But everybody pushed off the notion that he use a wheelchair until after the election." "This is all part of a larger whole where the Biden White House tried to hide the extent of his deterioration, both physical and cognitive, as much as possible." "In fact, as you we all know, we all saw as his shuffling gait got worse and worse from 2003 to 2004 (2023 to 2024). They started putting aides around him as he walked to Marine One, the helicopter, that was to kind of hide from public view how bad his gait was, how bad his walking was, his shuffling, and also in case he stumbled again to make sure somebody was there." "And this is just a piece of an overall campaign to try to conceal from the American people the extent to which the president was really struggling to do his job."

Western Lensman

423,996 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

WATCH: Fox’s Benjamin Domenech on Comey being indicted on two counts: “James Comey was one of the meticulous manipulators of media coverage that we have had in Washington in a very long time.” “He knew how to feed narratives and engage in spin. It would be particularly humorous for this to be the thing that tripped him up.”

WATCH: Fox’s Benjamin Domenech on Comey being indicted on two counts: “James Comey was one of the meticulous manipulators of media coverage that we have had in Washington in a very long time.” “He knew how to feed narratives and engage in spin. It would be particularly humorous for this to be the thing that tripped him up.”

TV News Now

82,381 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten