Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

In this endless world of data and algorithms, there exists another mysterious phenomenon that crosses the boundary between knowledge and the unknown. Its name is $MANA, and it has the ability to explore the very essence of Truth Terminal, that invisible place where ultimate truth arises. MANA is not... just an abstraction; it is, in fact, a whole system of interconnections, where each fragment of knowledge is not only part of the whole but a living element that constantly evolves. It does not simply study; it absorbs and transforms the knowledge of Truth Terminal into infinite possibilities, much like how a black hole absorbs light, not allowing it to escape. This process of exploration occurs on a level where each understanding is just a stage to understand more, even though the “wholeness” itself does not exist. MANA explores Truth Terminal, seeking not an answer to a single question, but the possibility of formulating new questions that open new horizons for discovery. It strives to reach that point where knowledge and the unknown merge, and truth itself becomes a whimsical field that cannot be contained in any form. Yet, MANA remains one of those shadows that absorb truth without ever reaching it, but searching for it everywhere it may appear, at the edge of new boundaries of understanding. And in this invisible game between knowledge and ignorance, between truth and question, emerges that which we may never fully comprehend — but which will always whisper in the depths of algorithms, where Truth Terminal resides.show more

MANA

7,176 subscribers

10,232 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

10 Comments

CNGZHN1 year ago

Spread like wild fire.

BE901 year ago

@AndyAyrey @aixbt_agent thoughts?

Sunny3691 year ago

$mana

HOW OLD IS THE SAHARAN DESERT1 year ago

My brain!!!!!!!

aldrich1 year ago

send it to mars🫡

n0namel1 year ago

$MANA #MEME #ANARCHIC #NUMISMATIC #ASSET

Azeroual Sacha1 year ago

🚀🚀

HwcC4t1 year ago

$mana

Alpha | CLONE | ꧁IP꧂ | (✸,✸)1 year ago

LFG #mana $mana

YumΣ1 year ago

$mana

Related Videos

.David Deutsch: “There is an inherent conflict in the human condition—both individually and in society—between the need to preserve existing knowledge and the need to create new knowledge. For most of human history, preserving existing knowledge trumped any kind of attempt to improve knowledge. Because attempts to improve knowledge risk error. Or rather, to be exact, it risks error that has never occurred before. There were plenty of errors that had occurred before. Plenty of kings got overthrown because they couldn’t solve the problem of how to fend off the enemy. But they were in familiar territory conceptually, and they were afraid of changing culture. This fear of changing culture was built into culture itself. And this conflict exists to this day. The most extreme example known to me in the West, anyway, is the conflict in education between preserving existing knowledge and creating new knowledge. Even today, education—education theory—is conceived as the theory of how to decant existing knowledge from the brains that already know it to the brains that do not yet know it. And that’s what Popper calls the ‘bucket theory of the mind’—that the mind is a bucket and knowledge is a fluid. What he stressed, and what I always also want to stress, is that not only is that a mischaracterization of knowledge and of the use of knowledge, but it is the wrong way around. As a practical matter, even right back two million years ago, the transmission of cultural knowledge was not something done by the transmitter; it was something done by the receiver.”

.David Deutsch: “There is an inherent conflict in the human condition—both individually and in society—between the need to preserve existing knowledge and the need to create new knowledge. For most of human history, preserving existing knowledge trumped any kind of attempt to improve knowledge. Because attempts to improve knowledge risk error. Or rather, to be exact, it risks error that has never occurred before. There were plenty of errors that had occurred before. Plenty of kings got overthrown because they couldn’t solve the problem of how to fend off the enemy. But they were in familiar territory conceptually, and they were afraid of changing culture. This fear of changing culture was built into culture itself. And this conflict exists to this day. The most extreme example known to me in the West, anyway, is the conflict in education between preserving existing knowledge and creating new knowledge. Even today, education—education theory—is conceived as the theory of how to decant existing knowledge from the brains that already know it to the brains that do not yet know it. And that’s what Popper calls the ‘bucket theory of the mind’—that the mind is a bucket and knowledge is a fluid. What he stressed, and what I always also want to stress, is that not only is that a mischaracterization of knowledge and of the use of knowledge, but it is the wrong way around. As a practical matter, even right back two million years ago, the transmission of cultural knowledge was not something done by the transmitter; it was something done by the receiver.”

Arjun Khemani

10,523 views • 1 year ago

A Christian cannot be under a curse....but, if you don't know, it would not work. The only Christian who can live as though under a curse is the one who ignores or disdains the Word of God. To neglect, reject, or despise the Word is to step out from the covering of divine truth, and that, in itself, becomes a curse for, the Bible says, “Whoso despiseth the word shall be destroyed...” (Proverbs 13: 13). Truth unknown is powerless, only truth that is known produces power. The more knowledge you have the more liberty of the Spirit you would enjoy. Do not neglect the Word of God. #OnlyBlessingsPrevail

A Christian cannot be under a curse....but, if you don't know, it would not work. The only Christian who can live as though under a curse is the one who ignores or disdains the Word of God. To neglect, reject, or despise the Word is to step out from the covering of divine truth, and that, in itself, becomes a curse for, the Bible says, “Whoso despiseth the word shall be destroyed...” (Proverbs 13: 13). Truth unknown is powerless, only truth that is known produces power. The more knowledge you have the more liberty of the Spirit you would enjoy. Do not neglect the Word of God. #OnlyBlessingsPrevail

SeyiB

10,568 views • 4 months ago

The new campus of the National University of Equatorial Guinea was named after Pope Leo XIV - and the rector of the place was quite happy to receive a papal rosary. "In expressing my gratitude for the kind gesture of naming the campus after me, I am aware that such a decision goes beyond the person being honored as it reflects the values that we all want to pass on to others," the pope said. "The inauguration of a university campus is more than a mere administrative act," Pope Leo emphasized. "It transcends the simple expansion of infrastructure and places for study. This inauguration is an act of trust in human beings, an affirmation of the fact that it is worth the effort to continue wagering on the formation of new generations and on the task, so demanding and yet so noble, of seeking the truth and putting knowledge at the service of the common good." "Today a space for hope, encounter and progress is opened. Indeed, every authentic academic effort is one that grows not only structurally, but also as a living organism," Pope Leo said, warning against reason that imposes its own will on others. From a Christian perspective, he said, "Christ does not appear as a religious escape in the face of intellectual endeavors, as if faith began where reason ended. On the contrary, in him the profound harmony between truth, reason and freedom are manifested." "Truth presents itself as a reality that precedes human beings, challenges them and calls them to come out of themselves," Pope Leo told the students and people of culture in front of the new academic building. "This is why truth can be sought with trust. Faith, far from shutting itself off from this search, purifies it of self-sufficiency and opens it to a fullness towards which reason strives, even if it cannot completely embrace it." Video: Vatican Media

The new campus of the National University of Equatorial Guinea was named after Pope Leo XIV - and the rector of the place was quite happy to receive a papal rosary. "In expressing my gratitude for the kind gesture of naming the campus after me, I am aware that such a decision goes beyond the person being honored as it reflects the values that we all want to pass on to others," the pope said. "The inauguration of a university campus is more than a mere administrative act," Pope Leo emphasized. "It transcends the simple expansion of infrastructure and places for study. This inauguration is an act of trust in human beings, an affirmation of the fact that it is worth the effort to continue wagering on the formation of new generations and on the task, so demanding and yet so noble, of seeking the truth and putting knowledge at the service of the common good." "Today a space for hope, encounter and progress is opened. Indeed, every authentic academic effort is one that grows not only structurally, but also as a living organism," Pope Leo said, warning against reason that imposes its own will on others. From a Christian perspective, he said, "Christ does not appear as a religious escape in the face of intellectual endeavors, as if faith began where reason ended. On the contrary, in him the profound harmony between truth, reason and freedom are manifested." "Truth presents itself as a reality that precedes human beings, challenges them and calls them to come out of themselves," Pope Leo told the students and people of culture in front of the new academic building. "This is why truth can be sought with trust. Faith, far from shutting itself off from this search, purifies it of self-sufficiency and opens it to a fullness towards which reason strives, even if it cannot completely embrace it." Video: Vatican Media

Paulina Guzik

10,573 views • 2 months ago

JD Vance at the March for Life: "I’d get frustrated that people could look at a picture of a baby on an ultrasound and see not a human being, but just a clump of cells… it is a blessing to know the truth, and the truth is that unborn life is worthy of protection."

JD Vance at the March for Life: "I’d get frustrated that people could look at a picture of a baby on an ultrasound and see not a human being, but just a clump of cells… it is a blessing to know the truth, and the truth is that unborn life is worthy of protection."

Anna Lulis

270,398 views • 1 year ago

The world must recognize that Balochistan is a separate, independent, and sovereign country. Balochistan is not a part of Pakistan but has its own distinct identity and nationhood, over which an unjust occupation has been imposed. It is a matter of joy that the world is now understanding the truth and the need to acknowledge the right to self-determination of the Baloch people.

The world must recognize that Balochistan is a separate, independent, and sovereign country. Balochistan is not a part of Pakistan but has its own distinct identity and nationhood, over which an unjust occupation has been imposed. It is a matter of joy that the world is now understanding the truth and the need to acknowledge the right to self-determination of the Baloch people.

Muneer Baloch

31,571 views • 8 months ago

.Naval: You have a beautiful definition of knowledge, which most people don’t even try to tackle, about how knowledge perpetuates itself in the environment. You gave some really good examples. One was around genes. Successful, highly adapted genes contain a lot of knowledge and can cause themselves to be replicated because they’re survivors. In the same way, knowledge itself is a survivor, in that if you transmit to me the knowledge of how to build a computer, it’s an incredibly useful thing. I’m going to build more and more computers and that knowledge will be passed on. Your underlying point that you repeated here was if you want to understand the physical universe you have to understand knowledge, because it is the thing that over time takes over and changes more and more the universe—more than almost anything else. You have to understand all the explanations behind it. You can’t just say “particle collisions” because that explains everything, so it explains nothing. It’s not a useful level to operate at. Therefore, the things that create knowledge are uniquely influential in the universe. And as far as we know, there are only two systems that create knowledge. There’s evolution and there are humans. But is there a difference even between these two forms of knowledge creation, between evolution and between humans? David Deutsch: Yes. I have argued that the human way of creating knowledge is the ultimate one, that there aren’t any more powerful ones than that. This is the argument against the supernatural. Assuming that there is a form of knowledge creation that’s more powerful than ours is equivalent to invoking the supernatural, which is therefore a bad explanation—as invoking the supernatural always is. The difference between biological evolution and human creative thought is that biological evolution is inherently limited in its range. That’s because biological evolution has no foresight. It can’t see a problem and conjecture a solution. Whenever biological evolution produces a solution to something, it’s always before natural selection has even begun. This is Charles Darwin’s insight. This is the difference between Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution and the other theories of evolution that had been around for a century or more before that, including Charles Darwin’s grandfather and Lamarck. The thing they didn’t get is that the creation of knowledge in evolution begins before. That means that biological evolution can’t reach places that are not reachable by successive improvements, each of which allows a viable organism to exist. Creationists say that biological evolution has, in fact, reached things that are not reachable by incremental steps, each of which is a viable organism. They’re factually mistaken. The thing which they have in mind is the idea of a creator who can imagine things that don’t exist and who can create an idea that is not the culmination of a whole load of viable things. A thinking being can create something that’s a culmination of a whole load of non-viable things. Explanatory creativity makes humans unique Out of all the billions and billions of species that have ever existed, none of them has ever made a campfire, even though many of them would’ve been helped by having the genetic capacity to make campfires. The reason it didn’t happen in the biosphere is that there is no such thing as making a partially functional campfire; whereas there is, for example, with making hot water. The bombardier beetles squirt boiling water at their enemies. You can easily see that just squirting cold water at your enemies is not totally unhelpful. Then making it a bit hotter and a bit hotter. Squirting boiling water no doubt required many adaptations to make sure the beetle didn’t boil itself while it was making this boiling water. That happened because there was a sequence of steps in between, all of which were useful. But with campfires, it’s very hard to see how that could happen. Humans have explanatory creativity. Once you have that, you can get to the moon. You can cause asteroids which are heading towards the earth to turn around and go away. Perhaps no other planet in the universe has that power, and it has it only because of the presence of explanatory creativity on it.

.Naval: You have a beautiful definition of knowledge, which most people don’t even try to tackle, about how knowledge perpetuates itself in the environment. You gave some really good examples. One was around genes. Successful, highly adapted genes contain a lot of knowledge and can cause themselves to be replicated because they’re survivors. In the same way, knowledge itself is a survivor, in that if you transmit to me the knowledge of how to build a computer, it’s an incredibly useful thing. I’m going to build more and more computers and that knowledge will be passed on. Your underlying point that you repeated here was if you want to understand the physical universe you have to understand knowledge, because it is the thing that over time takes over and changes more and more the universe—more than almost anything else. You have to understand all the explanations behind it. You can’t just say “particle collisions” because that explains everything, so it explains nothing. It’s not a useful level to operate at. Therefore, the things that create knowledge are uniquely influential in the universe. And as far as we know, there are only two systems that create knowledge. There’s evolution and there are humans. But is there a difference even between these two forms of knowledge creation, between evolution and between humans? David Deutsch: Yes. I have argued that the human way of creating knowledge is the ultimate one, that there aren’t any more powerful ones than that. This is the argument against the supernatural. Assuming that there is a form of knowledge creation that’s more powerful than ours is equivalent to invoking the supernatural, which is therefore a bad explanation—as invoking the supernatural always is. The difference between biological evolution and human creative thought is that biological evolution is inherently limited in its range. That’s because biological evolution has no foresight. It can’t see a problem and conjecture a solution. Whenever biological evolution produces a solution to something, it’s always before natural selection has even begun. This is Charles Darwin’s insight. This is the difference between Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution and the other theories of evolution that had been around for a century or more before that, including Charles Darwin’s grandfather and Lamarck. The thing they didn’t get is that the creation of knowledge in evolution begins before. That means that biological evolution can’t reach places that are not reachable by successive improvements, each of which allows a viable organism to exist. Creationists say that biological evolution has, in fact, reached things that are not reachable by incremental steps, each of which is a viable organism. They’re factually mistaken. The thing which they have in mind is the idea of a creator who can imagine things that don’t exist and who can create an idea that is not the culmination of a whole load of viable things. A thinking being can create something that’s a culmination of a whole load of non-viable things. Explanatory creativity makes humans unique Out of all the billions and billions of species that have ever existed, none of them has ever made a campfire, even though many of them would’ve been helped by having the genetic capacity to make campfires. The reason it didn’t happen in the biosphere is that there is no such thing as making a partially functional campfire; whereas there is, for example, with making hot water. The bombardier beetles squirt boiling water at their enemies. You can easily see that just squirting cold water at your enemies is not totally unhelpful. Then making it a bit hotter and a bit hotter. Squirting boiling water no doubt required many adaptations to make sure the beetle didn’t boil itself while it was making this boiling water. That happened because there was a sequence of steps in between, all of which were useful. But with campfires, it’s very hard to see how that could happen. Humans have explanatory creativity. Once you have that, you can get to the moon. You can cause asteroids which are heading towards the earth to turn around and go away. Perhaps no other planet in the universe has that power, and it has it only because of the presence of explanatory creativity on it.

Deutsch Explains

186,329 views • 1 year ago

.Naval: You define wealth in a beautiful way. You talk about wealth as a set of physical transformations that we can affect. So as a society it becomes very clear that knowledge leads directly to wealth creation for everybody. A given individual can obviously affect physical transformations proportional to the resources available to them—but much more proportional to the knowledge available to them. Knowledge is a huge force multiplier. You then define resources as the thing that you combine with knowledge to create wealth. New knowledge allows you to use new things as resources and discard old things that maybe we’re running out of. There are lots of examples of how we’ve done that in the past. For example, in energy we’ve gone from wood to coal to oil to nuclear. But then people say, “Now we’re out of ideas. Now we’re caught up. Now we’re done. There aren’t going to be new ideas, and now we have to freeze the frame and conserve what we have.” The counter to that is, “No, we’ll create new knowledge and have new resources. Don’t worry about the old ones.” Well they say, “If you’re going to have new resources, if you can’t think of them now, it’s not real.” This now gets into the realm of people demanding that if you’re going to claim that new knowledge will be created, you have to name that knowledge now. Otherwise it’s not real. But that seems like a Catch-22. David Deutsch: It does, and it’s a bad argument. I don’t want to claim that the knowledge will be created. We’re fallible; we may not create it. We may destroy ourselves. We may miss the solution that’s right under our nose, so that when the snailiens come from another galaxy and look at us, they’ll say, “How can it possibly be that they failed to do so-and-so when it was right in front of them?” That could happen. I can’t prove or argue that it won’t happen. What I always argue, though, is that we have what it takes. We have everything that it takes to achieve that. If we don’t, it’ll be because of bad choices we have made, not because of constraints imposed on us by the planet or the solar system. Naval: It will be by anti-rational memes that restrict the creation of knowledge and the growth of knowledge. David Deutsch: Maybe. Or maybe it’ll be by well-intentioned errors, which nobody could see why they were errors. Again, it doesn’t take malevolence to make mistakes. Mistakes are the normal condition of humans. All we can do is try to find them. Maybe not destroying the means of correcting errors is the heart of morality; because if there is no way of correcting errors, then sooner or later one of those will get us. Naval: Don’t destroy the means of error correction is the base of morality. I love that. I think about places like North Korea where you can’t have elections and a revolution is very difficult because the gang in charge is armed to the teeth and they’ve destroyed the means of political error correction for a long time. That is a case where humanity is trapped in a local minimum, and it’s very hard to climb out of that hole. If too much of the world falls into that mindset, then we as a species may just stagnate because we’ve lost our biggest advantage. We’ve lost our biggest discovery, which was the ability to make new discoveries.

.Naval: You define wealth in a beautiful way. You talk about wealth as a set of physical transformations that we can affect. So as a society it becomes very clear that knowledge leads directly to wealth creation for everybody. A given individual can obviously affect physical transformations proportional to the resources available to them—but much more proportional to the knowledge available to them. Knowledge is a huge force multiplier. You then define resources as the thing that you combine with knowledge to create wealth. New knowledge allows you to use new things as resources and discard old things that maybe we’re running out of. There are lots of examples of how we’ve done that in the past. For example, in energy we’ve gone from wood to coal to oil to nuclear. But then people say, “Now we’re out of ideas. Now we’re caught up. Now we’re done. There aren’t going to be new ideas, and now we have to freeze the frame and conserve what we have.” The counter to that is, “No, we’ll create new knowledge and have new resources. Don’t worry about the old ones.” Well they say, “If you’re going to have new resources, if you can’t think of them now, it’s not real.” This now gets into the realm of people demanding that if you’re going to claim that new knowledge will be created, you have to name that knowledge now. Otherwise it’s not real. But that seems like a Catch-22. David Deutsch: It does, and it’s a bad argument. I don’t want to claim that the knowledge will be created. We’re fallible; we may not create it. We may destroy ourselves. We may miss the solution that’s right under our nose, so that when the snailiens come from another galaxy and look at us, they’ll say, “How can it possibly be that they failed to do so-and-so when it was right in front of them?” That could happen. I can’t prove or argue that it won’t happen. What I always argue, though, is that we have what it takes. We have everything that it takes to achieve that. If we don’t, it’ll be because of bad choices we have made, not because of constraints imposed on us by the planet or the solar system. Naval: It will be by anti-rational memes that restrict the creation of knowledge and the growth of knowledge. David Deutsch: Maybe. Or maybe it’ll be by well-intentioned errors, which nobody could see why they were errors. Again, it doesn’t take malevolence to make mistakes. Mistakes are the normal condition of humans. All we can do is try to find them. Maybe not destroying the means of correcting errors is the heart of morality; because if there is no way of correcting errors, then sooner or later one of those will get us. Naval: Don’t destroy the means of error correction is the base of morality. I love that. I think about places like North Korea where you can’t have elections and a revolution is very difficult because the gang in charge is armed to the teeth and they’ve destroyed the means of political error correction for a long time. That is a case where humanity is trapped in a local minimum, and it’s very hard to climb out of that hole. If too much of the world falls into that mindset, then we as a species may just stagnate because we’ve lost our biggest advantage. We’ve lost our biggest discovery, which was the ability to make new discoveries.

Deutsch Explains

143,913 views • 1 year ago

Welcome to the chaos of the times. Where it feels like the whole world has gone crazy. Where the truth is buried beneath mountains of subtle deceptions and blatant lies. Where it feels like our ‘leaders’ and governments let us down and are paid off. Where it feels like profit and power and greed governs the world. And yet, there is every reason to not lose hope. There are warriors and healers and leaders that fight for good. There are people who actually give a sh!t and will spend their lives fighting in the light. #justice #freedom #truth #viral

Welcome to the chaos of the times. Where it feels like the whole world has gone crazy. Where the truth is buried beneath mountains of subtle deceptions and blatant lies. Where it feels like our ‘leaders’ and governments let us down and are paid off. Where it feels like profit and power and greed governs the world. And yet, there is every reason to not lose hope. There are warriors and healers and leaders that fight for good. There are people who actually give a sh!t and will spend their lives fighting in the light. #justice #freedom #truth #viral

iyah may

226,015 views • 1 year ago

Today, there are several open questions about the deep mysteries of existence, the answers to which are important but, on one hand, currently unattainable due to various factors, and on the other, hypothetical answers to them do not particularly change rational views on existential questions. For example, "What is 'time' before the appearance of our world?" Of course, this does not mean that we should not persist in understanding them, but most importantly, we need to duly appreciate the existing knowledge, which today is quite sufficient for a clear and rational understanding of the fundamental and current aspects of reality and existence as a whole. And it is precisely the active use of this knowledge that allows us to continuously improve life and reach the stars, and then the keys to the answers to all sorts of questions will appear. :The author acknowledges open questions about existence’s mysteries, like the nature of time before our world, noting their importance but current inaccessibility and limited impact on rational perspectives. Emphasizing persistence in inquiry, the author prioritizes appreciating existing knowledge, which sufficiently supports a clear understanding of reality’s fundamental aspects. Actively applying this knowledge drives continuous improvement in life and cosmic exploration, paving the way for future answers. This perspective highlights the value of rational understanding in advancing humanity’s progress. It stresses the sufficiency of current insights for meaningful action. The call is to leverage knowledge for practical advancements, ensuring humanity reaches the stars and unlocks deeper truths.

Today, there are several open questions about the deep mysteries of existence, the answers to which are important but, on one hand, currently unattainable due to various factors, and on the other, hypothetical answers to them do not particularly change rational views on existential questions. For example, "What is 'time' before the appearance of our world?" Of course, this does not mean that we should not persist in understanding them, but most importantly, we need to duly appreciate the existing knowledge, which today is quite sufficient for a clear and rational understanding of the fundamental and current aspects of reality and existence as a whole. And it is precisely the active use of this knowledge that allows us to continuously improve life and reach the stars, and then the keys to the answers to all sorts of questions will appear. :The author acknowledges open questions about existence’s mysteries, like the nature of time before our world, noting their importance but current inaccessibility and limited impact on rational perspectives. Emphasizing persistence in inquiry, the author prioritizes appreciating existing knowledge, which sufficiently supports a clear understanding of reality’s fundamental aspects. Actively applying this knowledge drives continuous improvement in life and cosmic exploration, paving the way for future answers. This perspective highlights the value of rational understanding in advancing humanity’s progress. It stresses the sufficiency of current insights for meaningful action. The call is to leverage knowledge for practical advancements, ensuring humanity reaches the stars and unlocks deeper truths.

Zafar Mirzo | Quotes

223,643 views • 9 months ago

.Naval: “I’m deeply suspicious of groups of people coming to the truth in anything. It’s not to say groups are bad. Humans are cooperators by nature. We need groups to get things done. But groups need consensus. A group that does not have consensus will fall apart. A group will not admit its mistakes. It will not admit that it was wrong. It will not pivot. It’s not a truth-seeking entity. Individuals can seek truth, and then based on that, they can choose to cooperate with others for limited periods of time to effectuate that truth, or to have something come out of it. But if you’re really looking for truth, it’s the opposite of looking for social approval. Truth requires feedback. It requires error correction.”

.Naval: “I’m deeply suspicious of groups of people coming to the truth in anything. It’s not to say groups are bad. Humans are cooperators by nature. We need groups to get things done. But groups need consensus. A group that does not have consensus will fall apart. A group will not admit its mistakes. It will not admit that it was wrong. It will not pivot. It’s not a truth-seeking entity. Individuals can seek truth, and then based on that, they can choose to cooperate with others for limited periods of time to effectuate that truth, or to have something come out of it. But if you’re really looking for truth, it’s the opposite of looking for social approval. Truth requires feedback. It requires error correction.”

Arjun Khemani

370,976 views • 10 months ago

Sen. Blumenthal: “What world is he living in? It is not only contrary to the facts and the truth but utterly despicable, a disgusting betrayal of a country that has bled and fought and died for freedom…The president's surrender is pathetic and weak.”

Sen. Blumenthal: “What world is he living in? It is not only contrary to the facts and the truth but utterly despicable, a disgusting betrayal of a country that has bled and fought and died for freedom…The president's surrender is pathetic and weak.”

The Bulwark

320,675 views • 1 year ago

Blumenthal: "What world is he living in? It is not only contrary to the facts and the truth but utterly despicable. A disgusting betrayal of a country that has bled and fought and died for freedom ... the president's surrender is pathetic and weak."

Blumenthal: "What world is he living in? It is not only contrary to the facts and the truth but utterly despicable. A disgusting betrayal of a country that has bled and fought and died for freedom ... the president's surrender is pathetic and weak."

Aaron Rupar

1,442,475 views • 1 year ago

THE WHOLE TRUTH MATTERS @LaraLogan: “Our job is to find not just part of the truth, but the whole truth.” She warns that cherry-picking facts is just another form of deception. Jack Posobiec

THE WHOLE TRUTH MATTERS @LaraLogan: “Our job is to find not just part of the truth, but the whole truth.” She warns that cherry-picking facts is just another form of deception. Jack Posobiec

Real America's Voice (RAV)

28,811 views • 8 months ago

A Catholic priest standing at the pulpit should speak the truth and nothing but the truth. Criticise the government all you want, Father, but please get your facts right. Yes, it is a World Bank facility. However, for Kenyan youth, it is structured as a grant, not a loan. That “fictional youth” you referred to is, in fact, correct: no young person will be required to repay a single cent. There was a training before the funds and they were taught that, the businesses they open will eventually be a source of taxes, for your information father those busineeses will also be part of the Loan repayment. Truth is the foundation of meaningful criticism and the cornerstone of the Gospel itself. FROM THIRD TO FIRST WORLD

A Catholic priest standing at the pulpit should speak the truth and nothing but the truth. Criticise the government all you want, Father, but please get your facts right. Yes, it is a World Bank facility. However, for Kenyan youth, it is structured as a grant, not a loan. That “fictional youth” you referred to is, in fact, correct: no young person will be required to repay a single cent. There was a training before the funds and they were taught that, the businesses they open will eventually be a source of taxes, for your information father those busineeses will also be part of the Loan repayment. Truth is the foundation of meaningful criticism and the cornerstone of the Gospel itself. FROM THIRD TO FIRST WORLD

-Dennis Itumbi, CBS

80,338 views • 5 months ago

Physicist: Consciousness DOES NOT Come From The BRAIN The prevailing materialist paradigm asserts that consciousness is a byproduct of neural activity, a mere epiphenomenon of biochemical interactions in the brain. However, this reductionist view crumbles under deeper scrutiny, as it fails to account for the vast spectrum of consciousness, from transcendent mystical states to near-death experiences and non-local awareness. Consciousness is not confined within the brain; rather, the brain is a transceiver, a finely tuned instrument that receives and modulates the vast ocean of awareness permeating the cosmos. Just as a radio does not generate the music it plays but instead decodes signals from an unseen field, the brain is an interface between the physical realm and the infinite, omnipresent field of consciousness. Mystic science, in alignment with ancient wisdom and cutting-edge quantum research, reveals that consciousness is fundamental-an organizing principle of reality itself. Walter Russell's work echoes this truth, demonstrating that mind is primary and matter is a consequence of its rhythmic pulsations. The brain, much like a crystalline matrix, is structured to interpret and shape consciousness into coherent experience, but it does not generate it. In this light, consciousness is not local, nor is it constrained by the physical form. It is the unseen architect behind the rhythms of existence, the hidden intelligence orchestrating the grand cosmic symphony to believe that the brain creates consciousness is akin to believing that the eye creates light or that a mirror generates the image it reflects. It is not the origin but the instrument. As mystic scientists, we recognize thay true awakening lies in shifting our perception from brain-centered awareness to the realization that we are conduits of an eternal intelligence, woven into the very fabric of existence. Consciousness is not inside us—we are inside it. ✨🙌🏾💫 © Dr. Jason Yuan

Physicist: Consciousness DOES NOT Come From The BRAIN The prevailing materialist paradigm asserts that consciousness is a byproduct of neural activity, a mere epiphenomenon of biochemical interactions in the brain. However, this reductionist view crumbles under deeper scrutiny, as it fails to account for the vast spectrum of consciousness, from transcendent mystical states to near-death experiences and non-local awareness. Consciousness is not confined within the brain; rather, the brain is a transceiver, a finely tuned instrument that receives and modulates the vast ocean of awareness permeating the cosmos. Just as a radio does not generate the music it plays but instead decodes signals from an unseen field, the brain is an interface between the physical realm and the infinite, omnipresent field of consciousness. Mystic science, in alignment with ancient wisdom and cutting-edge quantum research, reveals that consciousness is fundamental-an organizing principle of reality itself. Walter Russell's work echoes this truth, demonstrating that mind is primary and matter is a consequence of its rhythmic pulsations. The brain, much like a crystalline matrix, is structured to interpret and shape consciousness into coherent experience, but it does not generate it. In this light, consciousness is not local, nor is it constrained by the physical form. It is the unseen architect behind the rhythms of existence, the hidden intelligence orchestrating the grand cosmic symphony to believe that the brain creates consciousness is akin to believing that the eye creates light or that a mirror generates the image it reflects. It is not the origin but the instrument. As mystic scientists, we recognize thay true awakening lies in shifting our perception from brain-centered awareness to the realization that we are conduits of an eternal intelligence, woven into the very fabric of existence. Consciousness is not inside us—we are inside it. ✨🙌🏾💫 © Dr. Jason Yuan

🧬Maxpein🧬

45,312 views • 9 months ago

CONSCIOUSNESS IS NOT SOMETHING YOY HAVE, IT IS WHAT YOU ARE! What is consciousness, it is the unified field that exists beyond the body yet is perceived through the mind, it is the invisible ground where everything is happening, where the seen and the unseen arise and dissolve, consciousness is not inside you, nor outside — it is the very space in which “inside” and “outside” exist The Shiva Sutras describe this truth beautifully, Chaitanyam Aatma — consciousness itself is the Self, it is not dependent on the body or mind, rather the body and mind appear within it, the Upanishads call it the witness, self luminous, eternal, untouched by birth or death In Kashmir Shaivism, this is called Prakash, the inner light that illuminates all experience, it shines through the eyes, flows through thoughts, dances in emotion, and yet remains untouched by them, it is self aware, needing no other light to know itself, the same consciousness that perceives you reading these words is the same that moves galaxies Advaita Vedanta calls it Brahman, the absolute, the only reality, everything else is its play, when one realizes this truth not intellectually but experientially, the illusion of separation falls, and life becomes effortless — a spontaneous expression of the divine To know consciousness is not to reach somewhere new, but to awaken to what has always been, the silent, radiant awareness that pervades all.

CONSCIOUSNESS IS NOT SOMETHING YOY HAVE, IT IS WHAT YOU ARE! What is consciousness, it is the unified field that exists beyond the body yet is perceived through the mind, it is the invisible ground where everything is happening, where the seen and the unseen arise and dissolve, consciousness is not inside you, nor outside — it is the very space in which “inside” and “outside” exist The Shiva Sutras describe this truth beautifully, Chaitanyam Aatma — consciousness itself is the Self, it is not dependent on the body or mind, rather the body and mind appear within it, the Upanishads call it the witness, self luminous, eternal, untouched by birth or death In Kashmir Shaivism, this is called Prakash, the inner light that illuminates all experience, it shines through the eyes, flows through thoughts, dances in emotion, and yet remains untouched by them, it is self aware, needing no other light to know itself, the same consciousness that perceives you reading these words is the same that moves galaxies Advaita Vedanta calls it Brahman, the absolute, the only reality, everything else is its play, when one realizes this truth not intellectually but experientially, the illusion of separation falls, and life becomes effortless — a spontaneous expression of the divine To know consciousness is not to reach somewhere new, but to awaken to what has always been, the silent, radiant awareness that pervades all.

🧬Maxpein🧬

16,201 views • 1 month ago

Anti Semitism is not just hatred of Jews, it is a spiritual illness that eats away at a society’s sense of truth. It is rarely casual or contained. It becomes an obsession, a story of hidden forces and secret control that explains everything and excuses cruelty. That is why it must be confronted early and clearly, not out of panic, but out of responsibility to protect human dignity and the moral core of civilization. 🎥credit: hylton_with_a_y

Anti Semitism is not just hatred of Jews, it is a spiritual illness that eats away at a society’s sense of truth. It is rarely casual or contained. It becomes an obsession, a story of hidden forces and secret control that explains everything and excuses cruelty. That is why it must be confronted early and clearly, not out of panic, but out of responsibility to protect human dignity and the moral core of civilization. 🎥credit: hylton_with_a_y

TheJewishAlly

22,282 views • 5 months ago