正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

In this impromptu interview with Senator Alex Antic, he says the misinfo bill will signal the end of free speech in this country. Although it’s looking more promising that we’ll have the numbers to stop this bill, please keep up the pressure on the following Senators to ensure they... show more

Dr Joanna Howe

27,068 subscribers

21,774 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

10 条评论

Mark Rowley 的头像

Mark Rowley1 年前

@SenatorAntic

WaltzingRNLilydale 🏴‍☠️ 的头像

WaltzingRNLilydale 🏴‍☠️1 年前

@SenatorAntic

Jane Saunders 的头像

Jane Saunders1 年前

CALL TO ACTION MISINFORMATION BILL I've made it easy for you simply copy & paste to the emails below ; Dear Sir/Madam, I am writing to express my grave concerns about Mis/Dis/Information Bill, which is potential threat to democracy. I also ask you make this submission public These are the main issues that I am worried about: The Misinformation Bill makes the Government an arbiter of truth, exempting itself from scrutiny despite governments frequently being wrong. The MisInformation Bill threatens free speech as it enables social media companies to censor differing political views, complicating the distinction between truth and falsehood. By making it economical for social media companies to censor content, the MisInformation Bill undermines social media, especially given the eSafety Commissioner's history of informal censorship. The MisInformation Bill is a serious risk to Democracy because it empowers authorities to censor the internet and may lead to suppression of political views labeled as misinformation. The MisInformation Bill's enormous fines are out of reach for small startups, undermining Australia's tech industry and favoring BigTech, deterring other companies from doing business here. The Bill's censorship invites a healthcare dictatorship, risking public health by allowing only the government's pandemic view, which discredits the law. The Bills censorship protects the powerful and discredits the law, ironically undermining trust in banks, making them appear untrustworthy. It is time to oppose the Mis/Dis/Information Bill. Regards, Just put your own name in Send to [email protected] FINAL 4 SENATORS NEEDED TO CONTACT AND PUBLICLY ANNOUNCE THEY WILL VOTE NO ON THE MISINFORMATION BILL : Fatima Payman [email protected] Lidia Thorpe [email protected] Jacqui Lambie [email protected] David Van [email protected] If 2 of them do the same, IT IS DEAD ☠️ Let’s force a response out of them.

Al 的头像

Al1 年前

@SenatorAntic I find it hard to believe that we have so many senators that are not saying 'No' to this bill - this smacks of corruption - who is paying these senators to say 'Yes'? And how come we have so few representatives of the Australian people in the Senate?

Baci 的头像

Baci1 年前

@SenatorAntic

🇳🇿bbold🇦🇺 的头像

🇳🇿bbold🇦🇺1 年前

@SenatorAntic Who are the Labor senators in South Australia who are going to vote yes to this dystopian bill? There should be a massive community push to vote these people out at the next election.

paytgmn1 的头像

paytgmn11 年前

@SenatorAntic Kill the bill 👏👏

Queen Bee 的头像

Queen Bee1 年前

@SenatorAntic Senator Alex is one of the best.

Sharon Albanese 的头像

Sharon Albanese1 年前

@SenatorAntic The LNP needs more people like Alex Antic.

Bryce 的头像

Bryce1 年前

@SenatorAntic Pocock, Tyrell, Payman, and Lambie all vote NO to Albo’s misinformation / disinformation bill.🙌🙌

相关视频

🚨URGENT CALL TO ACTION REGARDING “SOCIAL MEDIA MINIMUM AGE” LEGISLATION🚨 Step 1) Generate letter via Free Speech Union of Australia tool linked below: Step 2) Send the email to your local Senator below and remind them that if they support the bill, you will preference against them at the upcoming election. COALITION SENATORS UP FOR RE-ELECTION: NSW Hollie Hughes - senator.hughes@aph.gov.au NSW Senator Andrew Bragg - senator.bragg@aph.gov.au VIC Jane Hume - senator.hume@aph.gov.au VIC Senator James Paterson - senator.paterson@aph.gov.au SA Senator David Fawcett - senator.fawcett@aph.gov.au SA Senator Anne Ruston - senator.ruston@aph.gov.au QLD Senator Paul Scarr - senator.scarr@aph.gov.au WA Senator Slade Brockman - senator.brockman@aph.gov.au WA Senator Linda Reynolds - senator.reynolds@aph.gov.au WA Senator Matt O'Sullivan - senator.matt.o'sullivan@aph.gov.au TAS Senator Claire Chandler - senator.chandler@aph.gov.au TAS Senator Richard Colbeck - senator.colbeck@aph.gov.au NT Senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price - Senator.NampijinpaPrice@aph.gov.au LABOR SENATORS UP FOR RE-ELECTION: NSW Senator Tim Ayres - senator.ayres@aph.gov.au NSW Senator Tony Sheldon - senator.sheldon@aph.gov.au TAS Senator Catryna Bilyk - senator.bilyk@aph.gov.au TAS Senator Carol Brown - senator.carol.brown@aph.gov.au VIC Senator Raff Ciccone - senator.ciccone@aph.gov.au VIC Senator Jess Walsh - senator.walsh@aph.gov.au WA Senator Senator Varun Ghosh - senator.ghosh@aph.gov.au WA Senator Louise Pratt - senator.pratt@aph.gov.au SA Senator Karen Grogan - senator.grogan@aph.gov.au SA Senator Senator Marielle Smith - senator.marielle.smith@aph.gov.au NT Senator Malarndirri McCarthy - Senator.McCarthy@aph.gov.au ACT Senator Katy Gallagher - senator.katy.gallagher@aph.gov.au QLD Senator Nita Green - senator.green@aph.gov.au CROSSBENCH SENATORS NEEDED: Senator Fatima Payman - Senator.Payman@aph.gov.au Senator David Pocock - Senator.David.Pocock@aph.gov.au Based on the assumption that the Greens + Jacqui Lambie will stick with their word and vote against the u16 bill — it can be killed. SHARE THIS POST!

🚨URGENT CALL TO ACTION REGARDING “SOCIAL MEDIA MINIMUM AGE” LEGISLATION🚨 Step 1) Generate letter via Free Speech Union of Australia tool linked below: Step 2) Send the email to your local Senator below and remind them that if they support the bill, you will preference against them at the upcoming election. COALITION SENATORS UP FOR RE-ELECTION: NSW Hollie Hughes - [email protected] NSW Senator Andrew Bragg - [email protected] VIC Jane Hume - [email protected] VIC Senator James Paterson - [email protected] SA Senator David Fawcett - [email protected] SA Senator Anne Ruston - [email protected] QLD Senator Paul Scarr - [email protected] WA Senator Slade Brockman - [email protected] WA Senator Linda Reynolds - [email protected] WA Senator Matt O'Sullivan - senator.matt.o'[email protected] TAS Senator Claire Chandler - [email protected] TAS Senator Richard Colbeck - [email protected] NT Senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price - [email protected] LABOR SENATORS UP FOR RE-ELECTION: NSW Senator Tim Ayres - [email protected] NSW Senator Tony Sheldon - [email protected] TAS Senator Catryna Bilyk - [email protected] TAS Senator Carol Brown - [email protected] VIC Senator Raff Ciccone - [email protected] VIC Senator Jess Walsh - [email protected] WA Senator Senator Varun Ghosh - [email protected] WA Senator Louise Pratt - [email protected] SA Senator Karen Grogan - [email protected] SA Senator Senator Marielle Smith - [email protected] NT Senator Malarndirri McCarthy - [email protected] ACT Senator Katy Gallagher - [email protected] QLD Senator Nita Green - [email protected] CROSSBENCH SENATORS NEEDED: Senator Fatima Payman - [email protected] Senator David Pocock - [email protected] Based on the assumption that the Greens + Jacqui Lambie will stick with their word and vote against the u16 bill — it can be killed. SHARE THIS POST!

Anthony Khallouf

49,716 次观看 • 1 年前

WE WON - THE MAD BILL IS DEAD 💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥 With Senator Payman and Jacqui Lambie confirming today because of the public pressure they’ve received, they will vote against the Bill - it’s over. Even with the Greens and remaining two independent senators yet to declare how they will vote - Albanese doesn’t have the numbers in the Senate to pass it. This is a magnificent win against the odds for the freedom fighters - for everyone that attended our rally at Speakers Corner and the following week in Melbourne, to everyone that shared or liked or commented on a post about the MAD Bill - to everyone that phoned or emailed a MP or Senator - WE DID IT LONG LIVE FREEDOM OF SPEECH

WE WON - THE MAD BILL IS DEAD 💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥 With Senator Payman and Jacqui Lambie confirming today because of the public pressure they’ve received, they will vote against the Bill - it’s over. Even with the Greens and remaining two independent senators yet to declare how they will vote - Albanese doesn’t have the numbers in the Senate to pass it. This is a magnificent win against the odds for the freedom fighters - for everyone that attended our rally at Speakers Corner and the following week in Melbourne, to everyone that shared or liked or commented on a post about the MAD Bill - to everyone that phoned or emailed a MP or Senator - WE DID IT LONG LIVE FREEDOM OF SPEECH

Craig Kelly:🇦🇺Foundation for Economic Education

293,795 次观看 • 1 年前

BREAKING: Footage shows Senator Ronan Mullen laughing, joking and handing out sweets as the Hate Crime Bill, with its sinister new definition of gender, is guillotined through the Seanad. Senator Lisa Chambers slunk into the chamber just before the session ended. She did not make any contribution. Despite the grave nature of events, the footage shows a clear sense of camaraderie and celebration among those Senators who claimed to be against the Bill. There was no vote taken on the Bill as only four Senators requested a division. A minimum of five Senators is required to force a division and thereby a vote. In March of this year Senator Gerard Craughwell stated “The Hate Speech Bill will soon come to Seanad & it is there it must be amended or stopped.” In August he tweeted “I believe that the Taoiseach Simon Harris would be “insane” to bring back a Hate Speech Bill to the Seanad.” Despite these words, last night Senator Craughwell did not appear to have even bothered to turn up in the chamber. His absence guaranteed that the Government escaped the accountability of a vote. The passage of this Bill through the Seanad, with its sinister new definition of gender, was a historic and grave moment for our country. In light of this the behaviour of the Senators mentioned above is of the lowest calibre and reveals how much they really care about these critical issues. The Hate Crime Bill will now shortly return to the Dáil for a final vote. We urge all viewers to contact your TDs and express your concern as a matter of the utmost urgency.

BREAKING: Footage shows Senator Ronan Mullen laughing, joking and handing out sweets as the Hate Crime Bill, with its sinister new definition of gender, is guillotined through the Seanad. Senator Lisa Chambers slunk into the chamber just before the session ended. She did not make any contribution. Despite the grave nature of events, the footage shows a clear sense of camaraderie and celebration among those Senators who claimed to be against the Bill. There was no vote taken on the Bill as only four Senators requested a division. A minimum of five Senators is required to force a division and thereby a vote. In March of this year Senator Gerard Craughwell stated “The Hate Speech Bill will soon come to Seanad & it is there it must be amended or stopped.” In August he tweeted “I believe that the Taoiseach Simon Harris would be “insane” to bring back a Hate Speech Bill to the Seanad.” Despite these words, last night Senator Craughwell did not appear to have even bothered to turn up in the chamber. His absence guaranteed that the Government escaped the accountability of a vote. The passage of this Bill through the Seanad, with its sinister new definition of gender, was a historic and grave moment for our country. In light of this the behaviour of the Senators mentioned above is of the lowest calibre and reveals how much they really care about these critical issues. The Hate Crime Bill will now shortly return to the Dáil for a final vote. We urge all viewers to contact your TDs and express your concern as a matter of the utmost urgency.

Enoch Burke

152,129 次观看 • 2 年前

BREAKING: Senator Mullin says GOP has the votes to pass Big Beautiful Bill after Murkowski flips. Game changer in the Senate. Near certainty that the bill will pass with Murkowski. Moments ago, Senator Markwayne Mullin confirmed the GOP has secured the votes to pass the Big Beautiful Bill—thanks to Alaska Senator Lisa Murkowski flipping to “yes.” Fox News reported from the Senate floor: “The vibes have definitely shifted in the last couple of moments here because Senator Markwayne Mullin told us that the GOP has the votes now to pass the Big Beautiful Bill and that is with Alaska Senator Murkowski.” “That just changed in the last couple of minutes here.” Mullin says Republicans already have the bill text locked in, and they’re simply waiting on Democrats to finish huddling: “The Democrats might put forward a couple more amendments and then the Senate Republicans will put forward a wrap-around amendment to clean this all up and it will go to final passage.” Murkowski was the critical vote they needed after some high-profile defections: “Murkowski has been the key vote that they've all been focused on for the last several hours here. That is because they already lost Rand Paul, they lost Thom Tillis and Susan Collins wouldn't say how she would vote.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

47,480 次观看 • 1 年前

The Albanese Labor Government's introduction of new misinformation and disinformation legislation is just a renewed attack on freedom of speech in Australia. This terrible bill will be strongly opposed by One Nation Australia! Labor has never understood freedom of speech or how it works, and people always fear what they don’t understand. That’s why Labor wants to shut down freedom of speech. That’s why Labor wants to give itself the power to decide what is misinformation and disinformation, and use this power to silence honest debate and honest criticism. Labor is appalled at the very notion that Australians still have the right to say things that Labor doesn’t agree with. Labor doesn’t trust the Australian people to sort out truth from fiction for themselves. With this bill, Labor shows its contempt for the intelligence of the Australian people. Labor will use this power to silence dissent. If you speak the truth that gender ideology is contrived nonsense, or that climate change is a scam, or that COVID-19 vaccines are harmful – Labor will have the power to silence you. This bill is all the evidence this country needs to have a good, hard look at enshrining the right to free speech in the Constitution. One Nation tried to move an inquiry to kick start this process. Labor opposed it along with those other staunch opponents of free speech in Australia, the Greens. When are Australians going to wake up and understand these parties for what they are? They despise democracy and the principles which underpin its foundations. There is no democracy in Australia without freedom of speech, its most important principle. One Nation will always fight to protect true freedom of speech in our continual efforts to defend Australian democracy.

The Albanese Labor Government's introduction of new misinformation and disinformation legislation is just a renewed attack on freedom of speech in Australia. This terrible bill will be strongly opposed by One Nation Australia! Labor has never understood freedom of speech or how it works, and people always fear what they don’t understand. That’s why Labor wants to shut down freedom of speech. That’s why Labor wants to give itself the power to decide what is misinformation and disinformation, and use this power to silence honest debate and honest criticism. Labor is appalled at the very notion that Australians still have the right to say things that Labor doesn’t agree with. Labor doesn’t trust the Australian people to sort out truth from fiction for themselves. With this bill, Labor shows its contempt for the intelligence of the Australian people. Labor will use this power to silence dissent. If you speak the truth that gender ideology is contrived nonsense, or that climate change is a scam, or that COVID-19 vaccines are harmful – Labor will have the power to silence you. This bill is all the evidence this country needs to have a good, hard look at enshrining the right to free speech in the Constitution. One Nation tried to move an inquiry to kick start this process. Labor opposed it along with those other staunch opponents of free speech in Australia, the Greens. When are Australians going to wake up and understand these parties for what they are? They despise democracy and the principles which underpin its foundations. There is no democracy in Australia without freedom of speech, its most important principle. One Nation will always fight to protect true freedom of speech in our continual efforts to defend Australian democracy.

Pauline Hanson 🇦🇺

112,720 次观看 • 2 年前

NY Democrats Gave us a Mother's Day Gift - TRYING TO BAN UNVAXXED KIDS FROM ALL SUMMER CAMPS! TAKE ACTION NOW! This is as underhanded as it gets — on the Friday before Mother’s Day weekend Albany Democrats snuck in a bill requiring all summer camps to ban all unvaccinated and partially vaccinated children from participation. A dangerous vote in the Senate Health Committee is happening tomorrow, Tuesday, May 12. We must stop this! Everyone needs to do the following right now: First, make 2 phone calls: Health Committee Chair Senator Gustavo Rivera: 518-455-3395 Senate Majority Leader Andrea Stewart Cousins: (518) 455-2715 Tell Rivera to remove bill S.3958a from the agenda on Tuesday May 12 - we want NO VOTE on this terrible bill! Tell Stewart-Cousins she must not bring this bill to the senate floor! Last, complete the following action alert now, then call your Senator and tell them VOTE NO ON S3958.a! Assemblymember Jeffrey Dinowitz and Senator James Skoufis are trying to do more favors for the vaccine industry with S3958a/A3254a, a bill that will require children who attend summer camp to be up-to-date with the required vaccine schedule. This is just another authoritarian bill that undermines parental rights, religious rights, and the authority of physicians to treat patients, for no discernible public health benefit, and further bolsters the Democrats’ position as puppets of the vaccine cartel. This bill has already passed in the Assembly so we will have to stop it in the State Senate. TAKE ACTION NOW! TALKING POINTS: Is there any need for this bill? Are there demonstrable outbreaks in summer camps? This bill will close dozens, if not hundreds of summer camps in New York. Once again, the Democrats have no clue how to incentivize business in New York. This bill would also place a considerable administrative burden on camps. Only one other state, California, requires all campers to be up-to-date with the school schedule. This bill just adds to the needless and unjust discrimination against people with religious beliefs that preclude some or all vaccinations since New York became in 2019 one of only 5 states that do not allow religious exemptions in 2019. Medical exemptions are technically allowed in New York, but they are nearly impossible to get, as shown by New York having the lowest rate of medical exemptions of any state, according to CDC. TAKE ACTION NOW:

NY Democrats Gave us a Mother's Day Gift - TRYING TO BAN UNVAXXED KIDS FROM ALL SUMMER CAMPS! TAKE ACTION NOW! This is as underhanded as it gets — on the Friday before Mother’s Day weekend Albany Democrats snuck in a bill requiring all summer camps to ban all unvaccinated and partially vaccinated children from participation. A dangerous vote in the Senate Health Committee is happening tomorrow, Tuesday, May 12. We must stop this! Everyone needs to do the following right now: First, make 2 phone calls: Health Committee Chair Senator Gustavo Rivera: 518-455-3395 Senate Majority Leader Andrea Stewart Cousins: (518) 455-2715 Tell Rivera to remove bill S.3958a from the agenda on Tuesday May 12 - we want NO VOTE on this terrible bill! Tell Stewart-Cousins she must not bring this bill to the senate floor! Last, complete the following action alert now, then call your Senator and tell them VOTE NO ON S3958.a! Assemblymember Jeffrey Dinowitz and Senator James Skoufis are trying to do more favors for the vaccine industry with S3958a/A3254a, a bill that will require children who attend summer camp to be up-to-date with the required vaccine schedule. This is just another authoritarian bill that undermines parental rights, religious rights, and the authority of physicians to treat patients, for no discernible public health benefit, and further bolsters the Democrats’ position as puppets of the vaccine cartel. This bill has already passed in the Assembly so we will have to stop it in the State Senate. TAKE ACTION NOW! TALKING POINTS: Is there any need for this bill? Are there demonstrable outbreaks in summer camps? This bill will close dozens, if not hundreds of summer camps in New York. Once again, the Democrats have no clue how to incentivize business in New York. This bill would also place a considerable administrative burden on camps. Only one other state, California, requires all campers to be up-to-date with the school schedule. This bill just adds to the needless and unjust discrimination against people with religious beliefs that preclude some or all vaccinations since New York became in 2019 one of only 5 states that do not allow religious exemptions in 2019. Medical exemptions are technically allowed in New York, but they are nearly impossible to get, as shown by New York having the lowest rate of medical exemptions of any state, according to CDC. TAKE ACTION NOW:

Teachers for Choice

15,750 次观看 • 5 个月前

The Labor Government is running scared of scrutiny. Their atrocious bill to establish an Australian Centre for Disease Control (CDC) is significant legislation—and I’ll go so far as to say it’s the worst I’ve seen in my nine years in the Senate. It’s dangerous. There were countless amendments that required answers, and many speakers were denied the opportunity to contribute. Serious questions remain unresolved. The Albanese Government manipulated the speaking list to push One Nation Senators to the bottom. Just before it was my turn to speak, Labor guillotined the bill, preventing any further speeches from being delivered. I managed to use the debate on the guillotine to deliver part of my speech, which is the video you see here. This marks a new low for the unscrupulous and arrogant Labor Government. The Greens should be ashamed for supporting the guillotine on such an important bill. The CDC will provide the government of the day with cover to do whatever it wants. It’s expensive, it will control dangerous research, and the reporting and scrutiny provided in this bill are virtually non-existent. This is unacceptable. One Nation will repeal this bill.

The Labor Government is running scared of scrutiny. Their atrocious bill to establish an Australian Centre for Disease Control (CDC) is significant legislation—and I’ll go so far as to say it’s the worst I’ve seen in my nine years in the Senate. It’s dangerous. There were countless amendments that required answers, and many speakers were denied the opportunity to contribute. Serious questions remain unresolved. The Albanese Government manipulated the speaking list to push One Nation Senators to the bottom. Just before it was my turn to speak, Labor guillotined the bill, preventing any further speeches from being delivered. I managed to use the debate on the guillotine to deliver part of my speech, which is the video you see here. This marks a new low for the unscrupulous and arrogant Labor Government. The Greens should be ashamed for supporting the guillotine on such an important bill. The CDC will provide the government of the day with cover to do whatever it wants. It’s expensive, it will control dangerous research, and the reporting and scrutiny provided in this bill are virtually non-existent. This is unacceptable. One Nation will repeal this bill.

Malcolm Roberts 🇦🇺

31,503 次观看 • 11 个月前

Tomorrow I will take the No Jab No Pay repeal bill to a vote in the Senate. The current law is particularly harsh. In simple terms, it says to parents, inject your children according to the government schedule, or we will cut your family payments. For some families, that can mean losing up to $35,000 a year. In a free society, I do not believe that is acceptable. As a crossbench Senator, I only get one real opportunity each year to bring a bill forward for debate and I chose this one. Credit to Senator Alex Antic, who first introduced the bill last year. Now let’s see where the Senate stands. You can watch live at 9am on YouTube.

Tomorrow I will take the No Jab No Pay repeal bill to a vote in the Senate. The current law is particularly harsh. In simple terms, it says to parents, inject your children according to the government schedule, or we will cut your family payments. For some families, that can mean losing up to $35,000 a year. In a free society, I do not believe that is acceptable. As a crossbench Senator, I only get one real opportunity each year to bring a bill forward for debate and I chose this one. Credit to Senator Alex Antic, who first introduced the bill last year. Now let’s see where the Senate stands. You can watch live at 9am on YouTube.

Senator Babet

22,001 次观看 • 25 天前

🚨 HOLY CRAP! Sen. Mike Lee goes on a MIDNIGHT CRUSADE in the Senate for the SAVE America Act, dropping straight TRUTH on every senator in the chamber "We need to make it easy to vote and hard to cheat, and we need to do that by making sure that people establish their citizenship and therefore their eligibility to vote when they register and that they show who they are when they show up on election day!" "This isn't hard. This isn't unusual. Every country in the entire WORLD, countries you're familiar with, countries you're not. Countries is wide ranging as Mexico, Brazil, India, Argentina, Peru, Botswana, Burundi." "They all have voter ID requirements. We do NOT." "We do not want to leave this amount of power sitting on the table so that foreign powers can send forth people who are not eligible to vote in this country and vote anyway." "We need to do this. The House of Representatives has passed the SAVE America Act. We now have the opportunity to vote on that same bill, the SAVE America Act here." "This bill, Mr. President, will disenfranchise no one. It will make us all more free. It will protect the sanctity, the dignity of your vote." "When we allow people who are not allowed to vote to vote, we rob Americans of their vote. Let's make it easy to vote, hard to cheat. Let's pass this bill." It ultimately got 50 VOTES, but needed 60. Nuke the filibuster!

🚨 HOLY CRAP! Sen. Mike Lee goes on a MIDNIGHT CRUSADE in the Senate for the SAVE America Act, dropping straight TRUTH on every senator in the chamber "We need to make it easy to vote and hard to cheat, and we need to do that by making sure that people establish their citizenship and therefore their eligibility to vote when they register and that they show who they are when they show up on election day!" "This isn't hard. This isn't unusual. Every country in the entire WORLD, countries you're familiar with, countries you're not. Countries is wide ranging as Mexico, Brazil, India, Argentina, Peru, Botswana, Burundi." "They all have voter ID requirements. We do NOT." "We do not want to leave this amount of power sitting on the table so that foreign powers can send forth people who are not eligible to vote in this country and vote anyway." "We need to do this. The House of Representatives has passed the SAVE America Act. We now have the opportunity to vote on that same bill, the SAVE America Act here." "This bill, Mr. President, will disenfranchise no one. It will make us all more free. It will protect the sanctity, the dignity of your vote." "When we allow people who are not allowed to vote to vote, we rob Americans of their vote. Let's make it easy to vote, hard to cheat. Let's pass this bill." It ultimately got 50 VOTES, but needed 60. Nuke the filibuster!

Eric Daugherty

80,741 次观看 • 4 个月前

Free Speech is Dead Yesterday I managed to get in a three minute speech against the proposed hate laws before the bill was guillotined. Normally you’re allowed to speak for 15 minutes on the bill. I didn’t get a chance to explain just how draconian these laws are. Before this bill, prosecutors had to prove intent— that your words deliberately incited harm. Not anymore. The Criminal Code Amendment (Hate Crimes) Bill 2024 lowers the bar so drastically that you can now be jailed for reckless speech. "Reckless speech" without any intent is now criminalised. Even if you accidentally offend someone you can be charged, found guilty and go to prison. A number of amendments to put in safeguards were moved including: 1) Removing mandatory sentencing 2) Excluding children under 14 from the bill and 3) A good faith carve out to prevent these rules from being used as a form of lawfare to shut down debate such as any of the below statements could soon land you in prison. • Marriage should only be between a man and a woman. • The LGBTQIA2S+ lobby keeps pushing radical gender policies on our kids. Maybe it's time we show them we won't stand for it anymore. Let's take action! • We need to stop mass immigration and expect assimilation because it brings division and poverty to our country. • The idea that gender is entirely a social construct is not supported by biological science. Those groups forcing people to accept this concept are dangerous. The major parties and One Nation did not vote for any of these amendments. In fact Malcolm Roberts voted against the exemption for children under 14 year olds. Pauline didn’t turn up to vote on anything. This is not unusual as Pauline didn’t turn up last year to vote on the 30 bills rammed through parliament on the last sitting day including the Online Safety Bill. When I said in my clip yesterday that One Nation voted for the bill that was what I was referring to. They didn’t vote on the final vote but if they were serious about wanting more debate then they should have expressed their view through voting on the amendments. To claim they needed more detail was a cop out. Clearly they supported children under 14 getting locked up for saying something offensive. By voting against stopping this and not voting for other amendments, Malcolm indicated more support for the bill than opposition. As someone with three children under 14 I was furious that any politician would agree to this. These laws are another nail in the coffin of democracy in this country. #auspol

Free Speech is Dead Yesterday I managed to get in a three minute speech against the proposed hate laws before the bill was guillotined. Normally you’re allowed to speak for 15 minutes on the bill. I didn’t get a chance to explain just how draconian these laws are. Before this bill, prosecutors had to prove intent— that your words deliberately incited harm. Not anymore. The Criminal Code Amendment (Hate Crimes) Bill 2024 lowers the bar so drastically that you can now be jailed for reckless speech. "Reckless speech" without any intent is now criminalised. Even if you accidentally offend someone you can be charged, found guilty and go to prison. A number of amendments to put in safeguards were moved including: 1) Removing mandatory sentencing 2) Excluding children under 14 from the bill and 3) A good faith carve out to prevent these rules from being used as a form of lawfare to shut down debate such as any of the below statements could soon land you in prison. • Marriage should only be between a man and a woman. • The LGBTQIA2S+ lobby keeps pushing radical gender policies on our kids. Maybe it's time we show them we won't stand for it anymore. Let's take action! • We need to stop mass immigration and expect assimilation because it brings division and poverty to our country. • The idea that gender is entirely a social construct is not supported by biological science. Those groups forcing people to accept this concept are dangerous. The major parties and One Nation did not vote for any of these amendments. In fact Malcolm Roberts voted against the exemption for children under 14 year olds. Pauline didn’t turn up to vote on anything. This is not unusual as Pauline didn’t turn up last year to vote on the 30 bills rammed through parliament on the last sitting day including the Online Safety Bill. When I said in my clip yesterday that One Nation voted for the bill that was what I was referring to. They didn’t vote on the final vote but if they were serious about wanting more debate then they should have expressed their view through voting on the amendments. To claim they needed more detail was a cop out. Clearly they supported children under 14 getting locked up for saying something offensive. By voting against stopping this and not voting for other amendments, Malcolm indicated more support for the bill than opposition. As someone with three children under 14 I was furious that any politician would agree to this. These laws are another nail in the coffin of democracy in this country. #auspol

Gerard Rennick

155,879 次观看 • 1 年前

TOO LITTLE, TOO LATE Finally the Liberals are objecting to the out of control eSafety Karen, with the comments of Liberal Senator Maria Kovacic. But it’s too late. The Liberals had the chance during the last Parliament to block or at least amend the Age Verification Bill - but they voted with Labor. I was screaming from the sidelines that the legislation dangerously sub-contracted the powers of the Parliament out to eSafety Karen, enabling her to usurp the Parliament and unilaterally decide how the "Age Verification" would be applied - and called for the Libersls to vote against it. But, the Liberals held hands with Labor and voted for this (with the notable exception of Alex Antic) - and now they don’t have the numbers in Senate to do anything.

TOO LITTLE, TOO LATE Finally the Liberals are objecting to the out of control eSafety Karen, with the comments of Liberal Senator Maria Kovacic. But it’s too late. The Liberals had the chance during the last Parliament to block or at least amend the Age Verification Bill - but they voted with Labor. I was screaming from the sidelines that the legislation dangerously sub-contracted the powers of the Parliament out to eSafety Karen, enabling her to usurp the Parliament and unilaterally decide how the "Age Verification" would be applied - and called for the Libersls to vote against it. But, the Liberals held hands with Labor and voted for this (with the notable exception of Alex Antic) - and now they don’t have the numbers in Senate to do anything.

Craig Kelly:🇦🇺Foundation for Economic Education

20,494 次观看 • 1 年前

“That is exactly what this Bill will criminalise. Conversations.” Previous governments tried to introduce a conversion therapy ban and failed. This Bill is far more sinister. It will criminalise the well-intentioned and often difficult conversations that parents may have with their gender-confused children. Previous versions of the legislation included specific carve-outs to ensure that parents would not be criminalised for such conversations. This Bill contains no such protections. Parents could face up to five years behind bars for discouraging their children from embarking on irreversible, life-changing medical pathways. This is a full-on assault on freedom of speech. Watch James Esses and Connie Shaw on the FSU Podcast 👇

“That is exactly what this Bill will criminalise. Conversations.” Previous governments tried to introduce a conversion therapy ban and failed. This Bill is far more sinister. It will criminalise the well-intentioned and often difficult conversations that parents may have with their gender-confused children. Previous versions of the legislation included specific carve-outs to ensure that parents would not be criminalised for such conversations. This Bill contains no such protections. Parents could face up to five years behind bars for discouraging their children from embarking on irreversible, life-changing medical pathways. This is a full-on assault on freedom of speech. Watch James Esses and Connie Shaw on the FSU Podcast 👇

The Free Speech Union

20,816 次观看 • 2 个月前

#WATCH | Delhi | Speaking in Lok Sabha, on Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Amendment Bill, 2026, Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju says, "All the members have come prepared, and several members from the Opposition have also submitted amendments; they, too, are well-prepared. This is an important Bill, one that is vital for the lives of children, youth, and students...Yet, the Congress party and some of its allies are deliberately preventing a discussion on such an important Bill...Initially, they were insisting that a discussion should take place, pointing out that the matter concerns examinations and the welfare of children. Now that such a significant Bill has been brought forward for discussion, and time has been allocated, they are still behaving in this manner. I urge my colleagues in the Congress party: please do not do this. Your image has already suffered greatly; do not engage in actions that will bring further disrepute to your party. The entire party should stand united and participate in the discussion on this important Bill, which aims to improve the lives of our youth and students"

#WATCH | Delhi | Speaking in Lok Sabha, on Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Amendment Bill, 2026, Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju says, "All the members have come prepared, and several members from the Opposition have also submitted amendments; they, too, are well-prepared. This is an important Bill, one that is vital for the lives of children, youth, and students...Yet, the Congress party and some of its allies are deliberately preventing a discussion on such an important Bill...Initially, they were insisting that a discussion should take place, pointing out that the matter concerns examinations and the welfare of children. Now that such a significant Bill has been brought forward for discussion, and time has been allocated, they are still behaving in this manner. I urge my colleagues in the Congress party: please do not do this. Your image has already suffered greatly; do not engage in actions that will bring further disrepute to your party. The entire party should stand united and participate in the discussion on this important Bill, which aims to improve the lives of our youth and students"

ANI

57,981 次观看 • 2 个月前

"I disagree with what you say but I will defend to the death your right to say it". They tried to silence us during the Voice referendum & they tried to silence us during covid. A really powerful argument from Kevin Hogan (NAT) today in the HOR. "This is the most dangerous scarey bill that I personally have ever got up to speak about." When he says this, hand on heart, they laugh at him. That's how seriously Labor & the Greens take our right to free speech in Australia.

"I disagree with what you say but I will defend to the death your right to say it". They tried to silence us during the Voice referendum & they tried to silence us during covid. A really powerful argument from Kevin Hogan (NAT) today in the HOR. "This is the most dangerous scarey bill that I personally have ever got up to speak about." When he says this, hand on heart, they laugh at him. That's how seriously Labor & the Greens take our right to free speech in Australia.

Francynancy

71,894 次观看 • 1 年前

Today, I shared the most personal of stories publicly for the first time about my Mum’s impossible bind and lack of real choice in the late-stage of her terminal illness last year. I will let my speech, and her story, speak for itself here. This vote today was on whether we continue our work on this or not — not a final vote that would have seen this Bill come into law. I voted for the Bill to proceed for further consideration, like last time, but this was not the majority vote, this time. I’m disappointed that we cannot continue our consideration of this at this time, and then have been able to take a final view, like last time. I want to be clear that I fully respect and appreciate that there are different views on this issue. I’m grateful to every fellow resident who has been in touch to share theirs, and engaged with me and one another with care and consideration on this. My lived experience has made my belief in the principle of choice for terminally ill adults crystal clear. But regardless of my experience, my job is to be legislator. I would never vote for a Bill if I felt it were unsafe. Indeed, amendments of mine to the previous version of this Bill were accepted unanimously by MPs, with different viewpoints and from different political parties. I will always listen, and consider such decisions deeply. I hope that no matter whether we share the same view on the principle of this issue, this approach is welcome. It’s impossible for any two people to agree all of the time, but that’s doesn’t mean any of us have anything other than the best of intentions. I’m glad that I did what I could today to speak up for my Mum, and others with terminal illnesses who want to have choice over their life and their death. It was tough, but I know it’s what she would have wanted. The hardest part, though, is knowing that more people will now have to go through this same experience as my Mum, me, and my whole family, before this next comes back to the Commons - and I truly wouldn’t wish this on anyone.

Today, I shared the most personal of stories publicly for the first time about my Mum’s impossible bind and lack of real choice in the late-stage of her terminal illness last year. I will let my speech, and her story, speak for itself here. This vote today was on whether we continue our work on this or not — not a final vote that would have seen this Bill come into law. I voted for the Bill to proceed for further consideration, like last time, but this was not the majority vote, this time. I’m disappointed that we cannot continue our consideration of this at this time, and then have been able to take a final view, like last time. I want to be clear that I fully respect and appreciate that there are different views on this issue. I’m grateful to every fellow resident who has been in touch to share theirs, and engaged with me and one another with care and consideration on this. My lived experience has made my belief in the principle of choice for terminally ill adults crystal clear. But regardless of my experience, my job is to be legislator. I would never vote for a Bill if I felt it were unsafe. Indeed, amendments of mine to the previous version of this Bill were accepted unanimously by MPs, with different viewpoints and from different political parties. I will always listen, and consider such decisions deeply. I hope that no matter whether we share the same view on the principle of this issue, this approach is welcome. It’s impossible for any two people to agree all of the time, but that’s doesn’t mean any of us have anything other than the best of intentions. I’m glad that I did what I could today to speak up for my Mum, and others with terminal illnesses who want to have choice over their life and their death. It was tough, but I know it’s what she would have wanted. The hardest part, though, is knowing that more people will now have to go through this same experience as my Mum, me, and my whole family, before this next comes back to the Commons - and I truly wouldn’t wish this on anyone.

Claire Hazelgrove MP

33,828 次观看 • 28 天前

All 100 U.S. Senators have approved the Epstein bill through unanimous consent. As CNN’s Manu Raju explained, this wasn’t a normal vote. It was a procedural green light, eliminating delays and skipping a formal roll-call entirely. Raju broke down in detail what comes next: “But now it is on its way to the president’s desk in a remarkable turnaround, in an extremely fast move here, the senate has essentially greenlighted this bill to be approved as soon as tonight and be sent to the president’s desk.” “Now, essentially, what happened was that in the aftermath of this house vote this afternoon, 427 to 1, just one member of the entire United States house voting against it, this is now on its way to the Senate.” “Now, there has not been a formal process that would be formally sent over to the United States Senate. That process would take some time to get through the official writing of…getting the bill over across the capitol.” “It’s an arcane process, but once it gets over to the United States Senate, that’s when the bill can be read in the senate and officially essentially passed.” “So what we just saw moments ago was Chuck Schumer, the Senate Democratic leader, he went to the floor of the United States Senate, and he said…he asked for what’s known in the Senate as unanimous consent.” “That means that all 100 Senators have to agree, or one Senator could object and slow things down. He asked unanimous consent that for when the Senate receives the final paperwork of the bill that just passed the United States House, that it would be approved by the United States Senate.” “Nobody objected to that, Jake. So what that means is that as soon as it formally transmitted, this bill is formally transmitted from the House to the Senate, the Senate will essentially have it approved.” “It will be approved in their chamber. There does not need to be a roll call vote, and then it will go to the president’s desk for his signature, in which the president has indicated that he will sign.”

All 100 U.S. Senators have approved the Epstein bill through unanimous consent. As CNN’s Manu Raju explained, this wasn’t a normal vote. It was a procedural green light, eliminating delays and skipping a formal roll-call entirely. Raju broke down in detail what comes next: “But now it is on its way to the president’s desk in a remarkable turnaround, in an extremely fast move here, the senate has essentially greenlighted this bill to be approved as soon as tonight and be sent to the president’s desk.” “Now, essentially, what happened was that in the aftermath of this house vote this afternoon, 427 to 1, just one member of the entire United States house voting against it, this is now on its way to the Senate.” “Now, there has not been a formal process that would be formally sent over to the United States Senate. That process would take some time to get through the official writing of…getting the bill over across the capitol.” “It’s an arcane process, but once it gets over to the United States Senate, that’s when the bill can be read in the senate and officially essentially passed.” “So what we just saw moments ago was Chuck Schumer, the Senate Democratic leader, he went to the floor of the United States Senate, and he said…he asked for what’s known in the Senate as unanimous consent.” “That means that all 100 Senators have to agree, or one Senator could object and slow things down. He asked unanimous consent that for when the Senate receives the final paperwork of the bill that just passed the United States House, that it would be approved by the United States Senate.” “Nobody objected to that, Jake. So what that means is that as soon as it formally transmitted, this bill is formally transmitted from the House to the Senate, the Senate will essentially have it approved.” “It will be approved in their chamber. There does not need to be a roll call vote, and then it will go to the president’s desk for his signature, in which the president has indicated that he will sign.”

Overton

291,904 次观看 • 10 个月前

BREAKING: ARCHBISHOP EAMON MARTIN URGED TO SPEAK OUT ON HATE CRIME BILL (NEW GENDER DEFINITION) Archbishop Eamon Martin is the Primate of All Ireland and President of the Irish Catholic Bishops’ Conference. Martina Burke and Josiah Burke visited Armagh on Saturday to raise the Hate Crime Bill with the Archbishop. The Bill passed the Seanad (Senate) last week and will go before Dáil Éireann for a final vote this Wednesday. The Bill would establish a radical new definition of gender, stating that "gender...includes transgender and a gender other than those of male and female". We asked Archbishop Martin if he would use his position of power and influence to speak out on this issue. Whilst the Archbishop stated that he had spoken in the past on this issue, he acknowledged that he had not spoken on the Hate Crime Bill in recent days. There was no clarity forthcoming from him on whether he would clearly address the issue of this Bill at this critical moment. Whilst he said that there were lay people who were addressing this issue, we would question why the Archbishop himself is not speaking out. In an effort to dismiss public concerns, Minister for Justice Helen McEntee has repeatedly stated that the redefinition of gender is for the Hate Crime Bill only and will not affect any other legislation. McEntee repeated this during the Seanad sitting last Wednesday. These statements from Helen McEntee are absolute lies. The true intention of the Minister for Justice and the Department of Justice is to substitute the new definition of gender into every piece of legislation on the statute books that involves gender. This was made clear during the Seanad Debate on Wednesday last week when a private Fine Gael email from Helen McEntee to Deputy Richard Bruton was read out by Senator Ronan Mullen. That email was in relation to the new definition of gender in the Hate Crime Bill. The email stated that a review of the Equal Status Act and the Employment Equality Act is taking place and that when that review is finished, the definitions of protected characteristics in the Hate Crime Bill will be reconsidered to ensure consistency in definitions across the Statute Book. In public and to the Houses of the Oireachtas, the Minister is saying that the new definition of gender is for the Hate Crime Bill only. In private and to her Fine Gael colleagues, she is saying that all definitions of gender across the Statute Book will be rewritten. Such deliberate deceit from one in such a position of responsibility and authority is reprehensible. It calls for the Minister's resignation. It is unbelievable that in response to this deceit, Senator Ronan Mullen was at pains to say that come what may, "I have the greatest of respect and goodwill towards you and your family…and that will continue." We thank God for the recent closure of the Tavistock gender clinic, to which hundreds of vulnerable Irish children had been referred. So-called ‘professionals’ placed these children, many of whom suffered from mental problems, on a pathway to puberty blockers, mutilation and, sadly for many, suicide. This Hate Crime Bill with its new definition of gender would give legitimacy to this poisonous ideology which preys on the most vulnerable and allows for no dissent. This is the eleventh hour. An incredibly dangerous Bill is coming before the Dáil next Wednesday. We are calling on Archbishop Eamon Martin to speak out.

BREAKING: ARCHBISHOP EAMON MARTIN URGED TO SPEAK OUT ON HATE CRIME BILL (NEW GENDER DEFINITION) Archbishop Eamon Martin is the Primate of All Ireland and President of the Irish Catholic Bishops’ Conference. Martina Burke and Josiah Burke visited Armagh on Saturday to raise the Hate Crime Bill with the Archbishop. The Bill passed the Seanad (Senate) last week and will go before Dáil Éireann for a final vote this Wednesday. The Bill would establish a radical new definition of gender, stating that "gender...includes transgender and a gender other than those of male and female". We asked Archbishop Martin if he would use his position of power and influence to speak out on this issue. Whilst the Archbishop stated that he had spoken in the past on this issue, he acknowledged that he had not spoken on the Hate Crime Bill in recent days. There was no clarity forthcoming from him on whether he would clearly address the issue of this Bill at this critical moment. Whilst he said that there were lay people who were addressing this issue, we would question why the Archbishop himself is not speaking out. In an effort to dismiss public concerns, Minister for Justice Helen McEntee has repeatedly stated that the redefinition of gender is for the Hate Crime Bill only and will not affect any other legislation. McEntee repeated this during the Seanad sitting last Wednesday. These statements from Helen McEntee are absolute lies. The true intention of the Minister for Justice and the Department of Justice is to substitute the new definition of gender into every piece of legislation on the statute books that involves gender. This was made clear during the Seanad Debate on Wednesday last week when a private Fine Gael email from Helen McEntee to Deputy Richard Bruton was read out by Senator Ronan Mullen. That email was in relation to the new definition of gender in the Hate Crime Bill. The email stated that a review of the Equal Status Act and the Employment Equality Act is taking place and that when that review is finished, the definitions of protected characteristics in the Hate Crime Bill will be reconsidered to ensure consistency in definitions across the Statute Book. In public and to the Houses of the Oireachtas, the Minister is saying that the new definition of gender is for the Hate Crime Bill only. In private and to her Fine Gael colleagues, she is saying that all definitions of gender across the Statute Book will be rewritten. Such deliberate deceit from one in such a position of responsibility and authority is reprehensible. It calls for the Minister's resignation. It is unbelievable that in response to this deceit, Senator Ronan Mullen was at pains to say that come what may, "I have the greatest of respect and goodwill towards you and your family…and that will continue." We thank God for the recent closure of the Tavistock gender clinic, to which hundreds of vulnerable Irish children had been referred. So-called ‘professionals’ placed these children, many of whom suffered from mental problems, on a pathway to puberty blockers, mutilation and, sadly for many, suicide. This Hate Crime Bill with its new definition of gender would give legitimacy to this poisonous ideology which preys on the most vulnerable and allows for no dissent. This is the eleventh hour. An incredibly dangerous Bill is coming before the Dáil next Wednesday. We are calling on Archbishop Eamon Martin to speak out.

Enoch Burke

143,439 次观看 • 1 年前