Sensitive content
This media may contain sensitive content.
Video yükleniyor...
Video Yüklenemedi
In this session, slave Jo Nep trialed my contrived method of self-inflicted nipple torment using breathplay. NB: This clip has audio #medicalmistress #breathplay #rebreather #nippletorture #nippleplay #breathplaymistress #medicalmistress #sutures #medfet #rubberclinic #mangina
11,908 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce •via X (Twitter)
0 Yorum
Yorum bulunmuyor
Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek
![someone is going to make millions with this in 2026 99% of people think this is a real human (or they fail to notice it’s an ai-generated video) but this video is completely ai-generated, including the background music. let me teach you how to create this in a few minutes follow this workflow step by step: first, create the base image of your ai influencer using nb pro. this is currently the best tool for character consistency i used a json prompt to generate the base image then i turn it into video (i will share the exact json prompt with you in this thread) now, to generate the video paste this prompt into google veo using the “frame to video” option “a man in his 40s sits on a 1980s living room couch, looking directly at the camera with a serious expression. he gestures naturally with one hand as he speaks in vintage tv broadcast aesthetic: "today is october 12th, 1985. what i'm about to tell you will sound impossible... but mark my words, these three predictions will come true. no background music, no sound effects” next, i gave it a chunk of script, i only changed the script dialogue each time and kept the rest of the prompt exactly the same using this method, you also get a little consintent voiceover here is the format for you to use: [character description] + [visual style] + [dialogue of your script for under 8 seconds] for example, for the next part dialogue; [A man in his 40s sits on a 1980s living room couch, looking directly at the camera with a serious expression. He gestures naturally with one hand as he speaks in Vintage TV broadcast aesthetic: "but mark my words, these three predictions will come true... ONE: You will carry a device no bigger than a playing card that holds ten thousand songs" ] rest things i adjusted in the editing, now how to clone the audio for these several clips we just generated? i got the best audio from the very first clip i generated using veo 3 but here is the trick: - export that clip to a video editor - detach the audio of it - duplicate it to make it 10+ seconds long - clone the voice over using elevenlabs (go to 11Labs-> click on voices-> click on "create or clone a voice" button in the top right side) (i named mine “1985 ai influencer” inside 11labs) then, finally export all your video clips into your video editor detach the audios of all clips, and export it to 11Labs to clone it with that "1985 AI Influencer" voice once you dubbed it, import it back to your editor that’s it. there are endless use cases where you can use such an ai influencer like this to promote your biz: - skincare - weight loss & nutrition - psychology and mental health - marketing and sales - predictions (like this video) - making money & career growth - dating, parenting, and so on… there are a few people already started using such ai influencers, you are just behind them, you can find their pages on instagram don't be lazy, create one such an ai influencer for your targeted biz 2026 is going to be yours](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2000200740137288169/amplify_video_thumb/2000197743109865472/img/sRF-I3pLFErUysD_.jpg)
!["[A] fake win we're all supposed to be...applauding is...removing mercury from vaccines...[but] if this is a win... are you going to vaccinate your children now?... If the answer is no, then why [is] it a win?...Each...shot has thousands of...proteins that are just as poisonous" This clip of retired pharma R&D executive Sasha Latypova (sashalatypova.substack.com "Due Diligence and Art") is taken from an interview with Shannon Joy (Shannon Joy) posted to The Shannon Joy Rumble channel on August 7, 2025. ----------------Partial transcription of clip-------------- "They're claiming that by issuing these lame press releases that we can poke holes in in five minutes. They are regaining our trust. Nothing can be further from the truth. It's the opposite of regaining trust. It's actually losing trust even more rapidly from the base that helped you get elected. So that's why I'm in full agreement with Naomi. These people have a humongous egg on their faces, self inflicted because they don't even communicate properly. "And you know, their actions are bad. But they could have softened the blow by communicating better or, you know, maybe, maybe they're planning to do great things. I don't know because I can't tell from their communication. Their communication is atrocious. "Another message is a very simple test you can do for yourself if you see something, some communication coming from HHS and saying that oh, we're doing something wonderful to regain trust in public health agencies. "For example, another fake win we're all supposed to be enthusiastically applauding is them removing mercury from vaccines or saying that they're going to remove mercury from vaccines. And everyone in Health Freedom, large, large commentators, large accounts are running around saying we're winning. It's such a great win. It's amazing achievement. It's such a, my, my advice to all these people, if this is a win, if you think it's a win, are you going to vaccinate your children now? So you on the Health Freedom side who were speaking against vaccines now that RFK Jr. said that he's going to remove mercury, are you going to get your children vaccinated now? And if the answer is no, then why are you calling it a win? "It's a nothing burger. First of all, it doesn't make anything safer. It doesn't make vaccines safer. Vaccines have thousands of poisons in them. Each single shot has thousands of different proteins that are just as poisonous. They have numerous amounts of metals. They have other chemicals that they don't disclose. They have aborted fetal cells, they have endotoxins they have E. Coli, they have salmonella, they have, formaldehyde, ethanol. And you're telling me that removing mercury makes a difference?"](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1953656432500334881/amplify_video_thumb/1953653318384758785/img/Pt6JPCSpJ8sMOZin.jpg)
![Continuing in my series of showing you the Woke Right's meltdown about talking with Jordan Peterson about Woke, thus them, I bring you some clips from Blaze Media propagandist "Auron MacIntyre." These require more analysis because unlike Carl Benjamin, Auron MacIntyre is a relatively skilled propagandist. So in this clip Auron begins by mocking Peterson and me for allegedly not understanding the slang term "based" (which is demonstrably false, btw -- I've detailed its history and uses elsewhere -- a typical sort of lie a propagandist tells). He mocks us as being out-of-touch old people ("old man shakes fist at sky") for believing "based" should refer to being "based in reality," which it should, so a digression to reveal the malicious technique. The origin of the term "based" used by the Woke Right was from a rap song about freebasing cocaine, and it became slang for being bold and edgy and saying socially taboo things. In 2021, the conservative movement at large started picking it up, understanding it to mean "based in reality and principle and willing to say uncomfortable truths as such." The "willing to say uncomfortable [things]" in both cases is where the confusion lies because it can be done two ways: responsibly (truths) or irresponsibly (edgy transgression). This is basically my point with bringing it up with Peterson. Setting aside the digression of whether we want a term associated with being the opposite of Woke to mean "based in reality and principle" or "high on ideological cocaine," Auron is particularly keen within the first few moments of speaking (~1 min) to drive the old versus young wedge that the Woke Right is so keen on pushing. Just like the Bernie Bros of 10 years ago, they want to invest their movement with "Ok Boomer" energy and cause a generational split. Historically, this is Red Guard behavior, which is cultural Maoism, which is... where Woke comes from in the specific sense we're familiar with and hate. So, he's being Woke in a particularly damaging and dangerous way. So using the classic Jon Stewart (Woke) trick of opening with mockery to create an atmosphere of humor that discredits his targets (Peterson and me) particularly with a target audience (young radicalizing right-wing) that he signals alignment of, he steps into his "analysis" by accusing me of a "pivot." Spoiler: I have not and never pivoted, and that's why they're pissed off at me. I didn't go along with THEIR pivot, which has been unfolding for a couple of years (particularly at the Blaze, since Glenn Beck retired and they hired a bunch of "Schmittians," including Auron) and went on steroids last fall in the lead-up to the election. His specific accusation that he's accusing me of is claiming that I said "the Left wanted to get rid of all racism, so these guys [Woke Right] want to bring back all the racism." This isn't my claim, but it will happen to some degree and is happening. Auron is creating plausible deniability around that here, but what was my actual claim? My claim was that Woke on both sides is characterized by the transgression of mainstream norms using the opposite side's radicals as the justification. The Woke Left transgressed against the term "racism" and successful and majority races with CRT by expanding the definition and reversing the classic racism "directions" under roughly Ibram Kendi's "antiracist" program of ending discrimination by discriminating. They did this in the name of "stopping racism," which they associated with the "far right" and claimed was endemic through all of society. It was society's norm of identifying actual racism correctly and not being racist in any direction they were actually targeting. The Woke Right transgresses against this same norm the other direction ("same energy, opposite direction") by leaning into racism in "based" defiance of the Left and CRT norms. They're violating a lot of taboos the mainstream depends on in the process, like not being racist, on justifications like "if every other group gets to be racist/tribal, we have to too for self-defense," which they're actually arguing pretty widely. The point is that both Woke groups are transgressing against norms against racism in different ways. Same energy, opposite direction. Auron directs his audience away from this point and builds a strawman that he can press into the train of mockery he already started. But what he actually does is shifts to make out that my real point is that "the most important issue we have to care about in society is racism," trying to place me in the CRT/Leftist camp, which I'm literally actually opposing in the clip he's commenting on (and that I've done more to oppose than anyone in the world, without any doubt to anyone familiar with my work for the last seven or eight years). He uses this straw man to lump together "center left, classical liberals, IDW" and to say we're "revealing ourselves" effectively as crypto-Leftists, which the portion of the clip of me that he played (aside from all my previous work) directly refutes. "Their religion," Auron opines, "is still antiracism." [So does he mean like being not-racist, like we actually are (not religiously), or like Kendi means it? Has he accepted Kendi's framing that there's only "racist" and "antiracist" and then tried to project that onto people who want to be not racist? Sure looks like it.] "James Lindsay, as much as he's against it, as much as he's written against it, as much as he's claimed to want to expose it, ultimately, he doesn't disagree with 'antiracism' as the core religion of the United States." That's a pretty astonishing sentence in its calculated falseness, and we have every reason to believe it was made deliberately and maliciously (Auron has a very long track record of precisely this behavior). The effect is to flatten all "center left" and "classical liberals," along with me and my work specifically, into a kind of crypto-CRT "religious" belief in an effort to discredit us and name us part of the problem (the "dialectical flattening"/psychopathic splitting I also discussed with Peterson comes to mind here, for those who saw the whole show). He aims to treat different things as though they're the same thing (Woke context and language blurring) in order to cast us as secretly in alignment with Kendi and the rest of CRT. "He, he, he thinks that that ['antiracism'] should be the 'civic religion' of the United States." No, I don't. This is called lying. It's also mind reading through secret (Gnostic) interpretation of hidden clues in my language and work that reveal that I mean the exact opposite of what I'm consistently saying. "He just doesn't like the extreme version of it." Still lying, but trying to make it sound more plausible. "He's like a moderate jihadist. Ok, he wants moderate jihad. M-m-moderate Sharia. That's what James Lindsay demands." So beyond being ridiculous and defamatory that's a really weird association to make, but it should be obvious why he's making it. The game is to discredit me through mockery and association with things his audience already doesn't like. Also, the Iron Law of Woke Projection never misses.... The Woke Right holds to a "No Enemies to the Right" policy of extremism, and I do not. Mockingly pretending his speaking my voice: "Ok, I still want Sharia Law. I still want a woman beaten if she's walking outside alone. I- You, you know, u-use a small rod instead of, like, you know, a large stick. That's kinda James Lindsay's stance on this, right?" No, "Auron," not right. "So, so he still wants racism to be, like, the central concern of the United States; it just needs to have a more reasonable definition. Stop looking at the [Woke examples] of racism; just go back to the good old 'antiracism' that we used to have." It's called being not racist, which reveals what "Auron" is really arguing for, as with his take on "based" at the start of the clip (he wants transgressive ideological high on cocaine, not based in reality and principle and courageous enough to stand for them). He has completed his straw man, erected him, and is showing the audience Straw James for mockery and rejection. "The problem for James is that the entire reason you [sic] got there is that there's a gradient to the logic [so it's all 'antiracism' on a slippery slope -- dialectical splitting again]." "Auron" is explaining here yet again that "liberalism," which he is deliberately unclear about, is just another manifestation of Communism, a quieter, more moderate crypto-Communism (or, specifically Race Marxism, here). This bit of propagandizing depends on the fact that his audience uses the word "liberal" inaccurately and blends together many things including classical liberalism, traditional liberalism, European social and economic liberalism, neoliberalism, progressivism, socialism, Marxism, and Communism for a lot of bad reasons that are too much to cover here. The point is that as a propagandist, he's not just relying upon this lack of clarity and exploiting it, he's also deliberately sowing more confusion in the name of clarity (...disguised as an angel of light, since his stream is all about Lucifer anyway), deliberately and maliciously. "Again, you'll notice that he wants those 'liberal' norms [not being racist] back, but what James never admits, what James never makes clear, is that the 'liberal' norms got him Wokeness." If I thought this was true, I would have said it. I'm not hiding anything. I just think it's completely false and have dedicated an insane amount of effort into making it clear for people around the world. Maybe "Auron" should listen to any of the hundreds of talks, lectures, or podcasts in which I quoted directly from the book Critical Race Theory: An Introduction where the authors (Richard Delgado and Jean Stefancic) explicitly state that one of the reasons Critical Race Theory exists is to attack "Enlightenment liberalism" (just like the Woke Right does!). Much of the writing in Critical Race Theory is explicitly, and at length, a criticism and rejection of liberalism and liberal norms in favor of completely different radical ones. If "Auron" did that, though, he'd risk exposing that Woke Right shares this in common with CRT while liberals do not. "The liberal obsession with equality, the liberal obsession with racism, is what brought you to Wokeness." This is a few misarticuated truths married to a lot of lies (that is, propaganda). It's a lot to unpack. Liberalism means equality before the law, not everyone is literally equal. CRT attacks liberalism exactly the same way, consider Robin DiAngelo's book titled Is Everyone Really Equal? As documented, say by Shelby Steele in White Guilt, it is true that the values of American equality and the circumstances of the Civil Rights Movement were hijacked by Race Marxists to open the door to the CRT racial dialectic, but that's not liberalism being obsessed with race or bringing us Woke. That's Communists exploiting people with certain sensibilities. That is, this is propaganda. This is already extremely long, and the rest devolves into him talking about ethnic hatred instead of "racism." I guess he needs more politically correct terms for it, "as a Christian," he says. The only reason to mention it is how he ends it. "However, James wants a much, much broader definition of 'racism.' He wants a political definition of racism. He doesn't care about how you treat people one-to-one [remember, I'm the individualist here...], he cares about using that definition to cancel you, right? And that's the plan. That's the plan." It's really more of the same thing, but it bears mentioning because it's the completion of his malicious straw man. It's not only completely false but obviously false except outside of the Woke Right narrative that he also pushes that I only created the term "Woke Right" (again, I didn't create it at all) to cancel people, which is the narrative he needs to get people to believe. That's underscored by his repetition of "that's the plan." My objectives with naming the Woke Right were abundantly simple: name a dangerous phenomenon in the hopes that it can be identified and stopped. I would not like to see people cancelled, but I won't tolerate this bad behavior either, not for any rewards they might dangle or withdraw. I hope every one of them realizes they are acting "Woke" and backs off from it. We need all the help we can get in stopping the huge global effort to subvert us and steal our liberty. My verdict here? This is among the rankest of rank propaganda. The Blaze, if (and only if) it wants to be considered a serious outlet in any regard, should be ashamed to be associated with this guy and what he's doing. I can't really even say this, though, because in light of the straw man built about me throughout, they'll say this is a Woke accusation on my part too, and an attempt to cancel him, but it's just a simple, plain fact. Rank propaganda isn't reporting or even really commentary, and there's nothing respectable about it. For years I've made the point that there's a key difference between "cancellation" and "taking responsibility." Anyone can find ample evidence of this. Why did I do that? Because the Woke Left claimed that anything that identified their bad behavior in our institutions was an attempt to "cancel" them too. It's a Woke (and psychopathic) technique called DARVO: Deny, Attack, Reverse Victim and Offender. Deny that you're doing anything wrong, attack the person who called you out, and make yourself out to be the victim of their "cancellation" attempt. Of course, adding this here will guarantee they'll howl with laughter as they yet again insist that's what I'm doing to them with this.](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1920582873217917439/amplify_video_thumb/1920567452460605440/img/bLWdKp3e0nnm0vIl.jpg)
