Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Incentives explain outcomes. Milton Friedman observed that you cannot simultaneously have free immigration and a welfare state. America’s earlier waves of immigration succeeded so well because, prior to 1914, the country maintained open borders without a welfare system. Immigrants arrived to work, support themselves and their families, and build...

Rothmus's profile picture

Rothmus 🏴

674,864 subscribers

28,594 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & PolitikBildungFinanzen
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Milton Friedman put it bluntly: 'You cannot simultaneously have free immigration and a welfare state. He explained why America's early open borders thrived—not from softness, but because immigrants came to work and contribute in a system with almost no welfare safety net pulling them in. Fast-forward to today: You can welcome people for jobs and opportunities... OR maintain a generous welfare state that offers benefits to all comers. But both at once? The incentives break down. Wages for low-skilled workers are pressured, public resources are strained, social trust erodes, and political backlash becomes predictable. This isn't about fear or prejudice, it's pure economics: math, human behavior, and historical reality. Friedman saw it coming. The contradiction hasn't gone away; it's only gotten louder. What do you think—should we prioritize open jobs or a robust welfare system... or is there a realistic way to have both? Drop your take below! 👇
2:52

Milton Friedman put it bluntly: 'You cannot simultaneously have free immigration and a welfare state. He explained why America's early open borders thrived—not from softness, but because immigrants came to work and contribute in a system with almost no welfare safety net pulling them in. Fast-forward to today: You can welcome people for jobs and opportunities... OR maintain a generous welfare state that offers benefits to all comers. But both at once? The incentives break down. Wages for low-skilled workers are pressured, public resources are strained, social trust erodes, and political backlash becomes predictable. This isn't about fear or prejudice, it's pure economics: math, human behavior, and historical reality. Friedman saw it coming. The contradiction hasn't gone away; it's only gotten louder. What do you think—should we prioritize open jobs or a robust welfare system... or is there a realistic way to have both? Drop your take below! 👇

𝐃𝐔𝐓𝐂𝐇

68,765 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Immigration used to be a working-class issue. Workers saw it as competition for jobs, housing, hospital beds, and every other government benefit. Milton Friedman said it plainly: you cannot have open immigration and a welfare state. The welfare state turns into a magnet, pulling more people into a government system where the pie is fixed. Every new claimant takes from someone who was already there. Either benefits get cut, or taxes go up, and the working class always pays. That’s why the political class now scapegoats the rich. They need the working man angry at billionaires so he doesn’t notice his slice of the welfare pie shrinking or quietly accept higher taxes to fund it all. Keep the resentment pointed upward, and maybe he won’t turn on the politicians actually responsible.
0:37

Immigration used to be a working-class issue. Workers saw it as competition for jobs, housing, hospital beds, and every other government benefit. Milton Friedman said it plainly: you cannot have open immigration and a welfare state. The welfare state turns into a magnet, pulling more people into a government system where the pie is fixed. Every new claimant takes from someone who was already there. Either benefits get cut, or taxes go up, and the working class always pays. That’s why the political class now scapegoats the rich. They need the working man angry at billionaires so he doesn’t notice his slice of the welfare pie shrinking or quietly accept higher taxes to fund it all. Keep the resentment pointed upward, and maybe he won’t turn on the politicians actually responsible.

Rothmus 🏴

14,038 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

McCormick: So back in 1914, we had anybody can come to America. And nobody had a problem with that. Free immigration, by the way. Why is that? Milton Friedman talked about it, and he’s a great economist, because something changed between then and probably the ’70s and ‘80s when all of a sudden—even back then—we started recognizing there was a problem. Why is that? What’s the difference between open borders and closed borders between 1914 and the ’70s and ’80s? PabloReports: Well, some people would say that it’s because white immigrants were coming in 1914 and Latinos were coming in the ’70s and ’80s. McCormick: Not at all. If you have jobs to come to and you’re paying taxes, everybody’s happy. But if you come here and you’re starting to take welfare and we’re paying for you being here, that is a cost to America. The business of America is business. If you’re doing something that’s bad for the American economy, that doesn’t lift the tide of all ships here, then it’s not good for America. This is about the American country that we’ve all grown accustomed to. And it has to make common sense. I mean, common sense is what we’re supposed to be about.
1:38

McCormick: So back in 1914, we had anybody can come to America. And nobody had a problem with that. Free immigration, by the way. Why is that? Milton Friedman talked about it, and he’s a great economist, because something changed between then and probably the ’70s and ‘80s when all of a sudden—even back then—we started recognizing there was a problem. Why is that? What’s the difference between open borders and closed borders between 1914 and the ’70s and ’80s? PabloReports: Well, some people would say that it’s because white immigrants were coming in 1914 and Latinos were coming in the ’70s and ’80s. McCormick: Not at all. If you have jobs to come to and you’re paying taxes, everybody’s happy. But if you come here and you’re starting to take welfare and we’re paying for you being here, that is a cost to America. The business of America is business. If you’re doing something that’s bad for the American economy, that doesn’t lift the tide of all ships here, then it’s not good for America. This is about the American country that we’ve all grown accustomed to. And it has to make common sense. I mean, common sense is what we’re supposed to be about.

Acyn

86,733 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

“One of the saddest things is that many of the children whose parents are on welfare will in their turn end up in the welfare trap when they grow up.” - Milton Friedman Many capable people want to work and provide, yet welfare rules pay single mothers more when the father stays away or leaves. But without the father, poor families are fractured and the same cycle passes down to their kids. It creates the incentive for recipients to trade their independence and dignity for bureaucratic control, with caseworkers treating them like children, deciding where they can live and what they do with their days. And even when a better job appears, fear of losing the job keeps them stuck because if they lose benefits, they might have to wait for months to get back on. And so what was sold as temporary help becomes a self-reinforcing trap that punishes work, ambition, and stable families.
1:03

“One of the saddest things is that many of the children whose parents are on welfare will in their turn end up in the welfare trap when they grow up.” - Milton Friedman Many capable people want to work and provide, yet welfare rules pay single mothers more when the father stays away or leaves. But without the father, poor families are fractured and the same cycle passes down to their kids. It creates the incentive for recipients to trade their independence and dignity for bureaucratic control, with caseworkers treating them like children, deciding where they can live and what they do with their days. And even when a better job appears, fear of losing the job keeps them stuck because if they lose benefits, they might have to wait for months to get back on. And so what was sold as temporary help becomes a self-reinforcing trap that punishes work, ambition, and stable families.

Rothmus 🏴

63,002 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Elon Musk is himself an immigrant, so claims that he opposes immigration miss the point. His view is simple: welcome newcomers who work, contribute, respect the law, and treat their adopted country and its people with decency. "Let me explain the fundamental incentive behind insecure borders. When a welfare state provides substantial benefits to anyone who arrives, it creates a powerful economic incentive for people living below that standard to come to Europe. If people can achieve a higher standard of living in Europe than where they are elsewhere in the world, they will come. It is a basic and powerful incentive structure. I am in favor of immigration. It would be hypocritical for me not to be, since I am an immigrant to the United States. I support immigration when people are going to be productive members of society, are honest, and do not mistreat people in the country they enter."
1:49

Elon Musk is himself an immigrant, so claims that he opposes immigration miss the point. His view is simple: welcome newcomers who work, contribute, respect the law, and treat their adopted country and its people with decency. "Let me explain the fundamental incentive behind insecure borders. When a welfare state provides substantial benefits to anyone who arrives, it creates a powerful economic incentive for people living below that standard to come to Europe. If people can achieve a higher standard of living in Europe than where they are elsewhere in the world, they will come. It is a basic and powerful incentive structure. I am in favor of immigration. It would be hypocritical for me not to be, since I am an immigrant to the United States. I support immigration when people are going to be productive members of society, are honest, and do not mistreat people in the country they enter."

Doge Tipping

11,268 Aufrufe • vor 25 Tagen

[WATCH] ON ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION What people don’t understand when they argue that the ANC promotes illegal immigration and is for illegal immigration, what they deliberately misunderstand is that we are firm on the law. The law must take its course and the state alone must enforce laws, because it’s got the responsibility to do that. We have not opposed people who have publicly protested the issue of illegal immigration but have called for those protests to occur within the confines of the law. No citizen of our country must take the law unto their own hands, chase people, show hatred and call people “amakwerekwere”. That is not ubuntu, that is not South African. These are Africans, and they might have landed in our country illegally and we believe that lawfully as we are seeing our government at this moment, they must be assisted to go back home peacefully. We must protect our borders as BMA is doing because they are too porous. Let us not make it possible for illegal immigration to flourish in our country. #RegisterToVoteANC #LGE2026
1:37

[WATCH] ON ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION What people don’t understand when they argue that the ANC promotes illegal immigration and is for illegal immigration, what they deliberately misunderstand is that we are firm on the law. The law must take its course and the state alone must enforce laws, because it’s got the responsibility to do that. We have not opposed people who have publicly protested the issue of illegal immigration but have called for those protests to occur within the confines of the law. No citizen of our country must take the law unto their own hands, chase people, show hatred and call people “amakwerekwere”. That is not ubuntu, that is not South African. These are Africans, and they might have landed in our country illegally and we believe that lawfully as we are seeing our government at this moment, they must be assisted to go back home peacefully. We must protect our borders as BMA is doing because they are too porous. Let us not make it possible for illegal immigration to flourish in our country. #RegisterToVoteANC #LGE2026

ANC SECRETARY GENERAL | Fikile Mbalula

52,581 Aufrufe • vor 10 Tagen

Howard Lutnick explains our broken immigration system: Open borders and a welfare state is a recipe for disaster “ You can't really open the border and say, ‘I'm gonna give my money to anybody who wants to come in.’” “That's getting it wrong.” “So when people say, ‘Open immigration is how we built America,’ they are right.” “And open immigration would be something interesting if we gave people nothing.” “Because if we gave them nothing, if they weren't smart enough, capable, entrepreneurial enough, driven enough, they would starve to death. And so they wouldn't stay here. They would self-deport and leave.” “But if you're gonna give them welfare, and you're gonna give them food stamps, and you're gonna give them housing, and you give them this, that, then everybody's gonna come and just leech off of us and we're gonna pay, and pay, and pay.”
0:48

Howard Lutnick explains our broken immigration system: Open borders and a welfare state is a recipe for disaster “ You can't really open the border and say, ‘I'm gonna give my money to anybody who wants to come in.’” “That's getting it wrong.” “So when people say, ‘Open immigration is how we built America,’ they are right.” “And open immigration would be something interesting if we gave people nothing.” “Because if we gave them nothing, if they weren't smart enough, capable, entrepreneurial enough, driven enough, they would starve to death. And so they wouldn't stay here. They would self-deport and leave.” “But if you're gonna give them welfare, and you're gonna give them food stamps, and you're gonna give them housing, and you give them this, that, then everybody's gonna come and just leech off of us and we're gonna pay, and pay, and pay.”

The All-In Podcast

78,031 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Imagine having to put up with this everyday at work. A man goes home to Romania for three months and expects his dole money and rent money to be waiting for him when he gets back. Under EU law, a person from another EU country can move to another country 1. If they have enough money to support themselves and their families . 2. If they have health Insurance. 3. If they are seeking work they can stay in Ireland for three months but again they MUST have enough money to support themselves and their families and have health Insurance. 4. They can apply for an extension of another three months if they are looking for work. So the question is why is Ireland 1. Paying for housing for persons from other EU countries who failed to optain work. 2. Paying social welfare to persons who moved here from other EU countries for extended periods of time. Also bear in mind There is no automatic entitlement to access social welfare payments in Ireland as an Irish citizen. To qualify you will need to satisfy payment related criteria, and either have enough social insurance contributions, or satisfy the HRC "Habitual Residence Condition" and a means test in some cases. Yet this guy wants it all.
2:20

Imagine having to put up with this everyday at work. A man goes home to Romania for three months and expects his dole money and rent money to be waiting for him when he gets back. Under EU law, a person from another EU country can move to another country 1. If they have enough money to support themselves and their families . 2. If they have health Insurance. 3. If they are seeking work they can stay in Ireland for three months but again they MUST have enough money to support themselves and their families and have health Insurance. 4. They can apply for an extension of another three months if they are looking for work. So the question is why is Ireland 1. Paying for housing for persons from other EU countries who failed to optain work. 2. Paying social welfare to persons who moved here from other EU countries for extended periods of time. Also bear in mind There is no automatic entitlement to access social welfare payments in Ireland as an Irish citizen. To qualify you will need to satisfy payment related criteria, and either have enough social insurance contributions, or satisfy the HRC "Habitual Residence Condition" and a means test in some cases. Yet this guy wants it all.

Keira Connolly

818,088 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

🚨🇺🇸 CENTER FOR IMMIGRATION STUDIES REPORT: 88% OF SOMALI HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN ON WELFARE A new report from the Center for Immigration Studies found staggering welfare dependency rates among Somali immigrants in the United States: 88% of Somali households with children are on welfare. Without children, 81%. 73% are on Medicaid. 54% receive SNAP benefits. The near-poverty rate sits at 66% with 40% unemployment. Only about 60% speak English. 41% lack a high school degree, compared to 5% for the general population. This data comes as the $1 billion Feeding Our Future fraud scandal continues to unfold in Minnesota, where state officials knew about problems as early as 2019 but allegedly faced pressure to stop asking questions. 61 convictions so far, with investigations ongoing. The question isn't about race. It's about policy. What is the purpose of an immigration system that imports populations with 88% welfare dependency? Who benefits from this arrangement? Some will call these questions racist. But asking whether immigration policy serves American interests isn't bigotry. It's basic governance. A country has every right to ask whether its immigration system is producing citizens who can contribute, assimilate, and thrive, or whether it's creating permanent dependent populations that strain public resources. Source: Center for Immigration Studies, Avery Daye
2:27

🚨🇺🇸 CENTER FOR IMMIGRATION STUDIES REPORT: 88% OF SOMALI HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN ON WELFARE A new report from the Center for Immigration Studies found staggering welfare dependency rates among Somali immigrants in the United States: 88% of Somali households with children are on welfare. Without children, 81%. 73% are on Medicaid. 54% receive SNAP benefits. The near-poverty rate sits at 66% with 40% unemployment. Only about 60% speak English. 41% lack a high school degree, compared to 5% for the general population. This data comes as the $1 billion Feeding Our Future fraud scandal continues to unfold in Minnesota, where state officials knew about problems as early as 2019 but allegedly faced pressure to stop asking questions. 61 convictions so far, with investigations ongoing. The question isn't about race. It's about policy. What is the purpose of an immigration system that imports populations with 88% welfare dependency? Who benefits from this arrangement? Some will call these questions racist. But asking whether immigration policy serves American interests isn't bigotry. It's basic governance. A country has every right to ask whether its immigration system is producing citizens who can contribute, assimilate, and thrive, or whether it's creating permanent dependent populations that strain public resources. Source: Center for Immigration Studies, Avery Daye

Mario Nawfal

34,962 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

🚨Britain is buckling under the strain of mass immigration and welfare abuse. Jobless migrant households have racked up £10 billion in benefits in just 18 months, paid for by your taxes. Enough is enough. In this powerful video, Rupert Lowe MP lays out two simple, common sense Restore Britain policies that would fix so much, so fast: No benefits for foreigners. No social housing for foreigners. And if they can't support themselves? Encourage them to leave and deport those who refuse. This isn't extreme. It's what any self-respecting nation does. Watch as Rupert explains why it's time to put British families first, cut the incentives for illegal boats, free up housing and NHS capacity, and finally end the taxpayer-funded piss-take. If you agree, this is the party that's ready to act. Join
0:31

🚨Britain is buckling under the strain of mass immigration and welfare abuse. Jobless migrant households have racked up £10 billion in benefits in just 18 months, paid for by your taxes. Enough is enough. In this powerful video, Rupert Lowe MP lays out two simple, common sense Restore Britain policies that would fix so much, so fast: No benefits for foreigners. No social housing for foreigners. And if they can't support themselves? Encourage them to leave and deport those who refuse. This isn't extreme. It's what any self-respecting nation does. Watch as Rupert explains why it's time to put British families first, cut the incentives for illegal boats, free up housing and NHS capacity, and finally end the taxpayer-funded piss-take. If you agree, this is the party that's ready to act. Join

Let'sRestoreBritain

73,147 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

🚨Britain is buckling under the strain of mass immigration and welfare abuse. Jobless migrant households have racked up £10 billion in benefits in just 18 months, paid for by your taxes. Enough is enough. In this powerful video, Rupert Lowe MP lays out two simple, common sense Restore Britain policies that would fix so much, so fast: No benefits for foreigners. No social housing for foreigners. And if they can't support themselves? Encourage them to leave and deport those who refuse. This isn't extreme. It's what any self-respecting nation does. Watch as Rupert explains why it's time to put British families first, cut the incentives for illegal boats, free up housing and NHS capacity, and finally end the taxpayer-funded piss-take. If you agree, this is the party that's ready to act. Join
0:31

🚨Britain is buckling under the strain of mass immigration and welfare abuse. Jobless migrant households have racked up £10 billion in benefits in just 18 months, paid for by your taxes. Enough is enough. In this powerful video, Rupert Lowe MP lays out two simple, common sense Restore Britain policies that would fix so much, so fast: No benefits for foreigners. No social housing for foreigners. And if they can't support themselves? Encourage them to leave and deport those who refuse. This isn't extreme. It's what any self-respecting nation does. Watch as Rupert explains why it's time to put British families first, cut the incentives for illegal boats, free up housing and NHS capacity, and finally end the taxpayer-funded piss-take. If you agree, this is the party that's ready to act. Join

Let'sRestoreBritain

74,492 Aufrufe • vor 9 Tagen

Congressman Brandon Gill says diversity is not helping America, it’s destroying us “The melting pot simply isn't melting. That's a problem. The foreign-born population is about as high as it's ever been in American history. What is the purpose of an immigration system? The purpose of our immigration system is to benefit our people. Historically, American immigration was predicated on two key ideas. One of those was you cannot be what's called a public burden. In other words, you can't come into the country and immediately hop on welfare and expect the American people to pay for your food and your housing, your healthcare and everything else. The second was a concept of cultural assimilation. You were expected to come into the United the United States and to become fully American, not a hyphenated American, you're expected to adopt our customs, our core beliefs, revere our heritage just like we do. Part of the rationale behind drastically reducing legal immigration as well as illegal immigration is allow that assimilation to actually occur, for people to actually melt and recohere as an American society.” Around 53% of households headed by foreign-born immigrants use at least one major means-tested welfare program I saw some data that showed 70% of Mexicans that come to America are on welfare, I made a post about it previously No immigrant should ever qualify for any welfare programs. They should be for American citizens and American taxpayers only
1:48

Congressman Brandon Gill says diversity is not helping America, it’s destroying us “The melting pot simply isn't melting. That's a problem. The foreign-born population is about as high as it's ever been in American history. What is the purpose of an immigration system? The purpose of our immigration system is to benefit our people. Historically, American immigration was predicated on two key ideas. One of those was you cannot be what's called a public burden. In other words, you can't come into the country and immediately hop on welfare and expect the American people to pay for your food and your housing, your healthcare and everything else. The second was a concept of cultural assimilation. You were expected to come into the United the United States and to become fully American, not a hyphenated American, you're expected to adopt our customs, our core beliefs, revere our heritage just like we do. Part of the rationale behind drastically reducing legal immigration as well as illegal immigration is allow that assimilation to actually occur, for people to actually melt and recohere as an American society.” Around 53% of households headed by foreign-born immigrants use at least one major means-tested welfare program I saw some data that showed 70% of Mexicans that come to America are on welfare, I made a post about it previously No immigrant should ever qualify for any welfare programs. They should be for American citizens and American taxpayers only

Wall Street Apes

88,822 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

The South African Immigration Crisis And How It Can Fixed With A Long Term Solution The political and economic chaos in neighbouring countries around South Africa benefits businesses and opportunistic politicians in South Africa. That is why business doesn’t condemn the abuse of human rights, rigging of elections and corrupt rule in countries like Zimbabwe, it is not in their best interest to do so because they benefit from the outcomes of failed rule in Zimbabwe. How does this work? Zimbabwe’s unemployment rate is 95%, it has the highest inflation in the world (1266% per year), hospitals have collapsed, and it is hell on earth without any social welfare system due to the continued looting of public funds by the Zimbabwean tyrant and his goons. This pushes desperate and unemployed Zimbabweans to cross the border into South Africa to find a job, healthcare, and a better life. When they cross over into South Africa, either legally or illegally, and overstay, they become vulnerable to local businesses which offer them employment paying very low wages, they take the jobs because they are desperate to survive. Businesses or farm owners in Limpopo or on wine farms in Cape Town badly underpay them, knowing they have no recourse to the law because they are illegal, something that they cannot do to a South African citizen who is protected by the law. As this happens, wages drop because cheap labour is now available, and it is not unionised so they cannot fight for any rights to fair wages. These Zimbabweans, and Africans in general, will take anything to survive and see another day, they have families to feed back in their countries of origin. This disempowers the South African worker, who cannot negotiate for higher wages because that power has been eroded and taken away by the availability of cheap labour. Businesses, in turn, tell the locals to go hang if they try to negotiate for a living wage because they have cheap labour readily available, the illegal immigrant needs the job. The locals (South Africans) get angry and fight these illegal immigrants in their communities, leading to the emergence of vigilante groups and peripheral opportunistic political actors who exploit this to gain votes from locals who feel stifled and desperate in their own country. Cosmetic, choreographed police and immigration raids are carried out to appease the restive poor and unemployed South Africans. These illegal immigrants are deported on a Monday, and by Friday, they are back. This is known as the revolving door. The border officials are so corrupt that they facilitate this revolving door because they profit from it, so you cannot currently use immigration control to deal with this on land borders where people come by road. Some illegal immigrants do not even leave South Africa because the police who arrest them will also accept bribes. In this heated emotional debate in South Africa, no real solutions are proposed because opportunistic politicians simply shout “ABAHAMBE,” get some votes and repeat the same to remain relevant in public discourse. It is funny how it is so easy to appease voters with such empty slogans that do not bring any tangible solutions, but the desperate voter is fickle, they fall for anything. What these politicians do not say, or choose to ignore, is that when these illegals go, they will return the next day. It is an inconvenient conversation for politicians because it undermines their ability to mobilise votes. The root cause of this immigration crisis lies in Zimbabwean and African politics driven by corrupt rule, the abuse of human rights, and rigged elections. President Cyril Ramaphosa and his ruling ANC political party publicly support the authors of this crisis in Zimbabwe, so the root cause cannot be addressed at the source now until South Africans have an honest family conversation to deal with this once and for all. Unemployed Zimbabweans feel that the ANC and its government have a moral obligation to let them come because they are supporting corrupt rule in Zimbabwe, and they are doing so publicly. This is compounded by the cowardice of Zimbabweans and the dearth of any meaningful opposition leadership in that country. Yet we have a serios crisis. So, what do we do about it to resolve the illegal immigration nightmare in South Africa, which is driving wages down and enriching businesses and the political class? Someone must put meaningful proposals on the table because this has been with us for decades, and it remains unresolved. These proposals should not be rooted in emotional discourse, but practical realities that confront South Africa. This crisis can’t be resolved through political rhetoric or “Abahambe” or any empty Pan-African slogans which ignore the ongoing realities. Real leaders provide practical solutions and don’t do it for social media retweets or likes, but for solid and long term resolutions that that will fix the crisis. We know that wages are being pushed down for South Africans due to the availability of cheap labour from illegal immigrants, and that these illegal immigrants cannot demand better wages because they cannot approach the authorities or unionise, given their illegal immigration status. The only way out, to help local South African workers who refuse to work for a pittance in restaurants, and rightly so, is to legalise those already in South Africa, so that the authorities know who they are. You implement regulations ensuring that these workers can be employed and pay taxes, but also make sure that jobs must be offered to South Africans first, they do that in Zimbabwe with the little jobs available, and that is a standard practice the world over. Where no South African is willing to take up the job, it can be offered to a documented migrant, who will be paying taxes. It will now be easier to negotiate for better wages because all workers local and migrant will now be unionised, something that big business and the political class privately do not want because it takes away the power to undermine wage negotiations and to campaign for votes respectively. Wages will rise for South African workers because everyone will then be able to negotiate for a better wage without fear of being deported. Any company caught employing illegal immigrants will be shut down immediately using laws created to deal with this problem of greedy business owners taking advantage of illegal immigration, with all the money in its bank accounts seized by the State. This will stop the employment of anyone illegal and undocumented and will provide cover for those given an amnesty for documentation. I want to make this clear, South Africans will never be able to negotiate for a living wage if there are illegal immigrants, politicians will lie to the citizens but this is the unpalatable truth. Once this is resolved, opportunistic politicians will then focus on service delivery rather than gaslighting poor South Africans with “Abahambe,” knowing that when the illegals go, they will return tomorrow morning. When illegal immigrants are documented and have bank accounts, they will begin to pay taxes and can also become entrepreneurial, creating businesses that will employ more South Africans and contribute to economic growth of South Africa. Documenting illegals and gathering their biometric data will also reduce crime because undocumented immigrants can commit crimes and evade detection, as the South African state currently does not know who they are or where they live. When they work legally or open small businesses, they will contribute to the South African fiscus, which will fund the public hospitals they use and the schools their children attend. The revolving door applies to Africans who need visas too, they are deported to Nigeria, they acquire a new identity, fly to Zimbabwe and come to South Africa by road where they pay border officials a bribe and get it in. Zimbabwe is no longer a foreign policy issue only for the South African government, it is a domestic issue as well because of illegal immigration that has brought many Zimbabweans into South Africa. It is not their fault, they are also victims of a corrupt government and each time they try to vote out the regime in Harare, the ANC publicly support rigged elections and give diplomatic cover to the Zimbabwean tyrant Emmerson Mnangagwa. Refusing to document illegals hoping that deportations will solve the problem demonstrates incompetence and ignorance to how illegal immigration works. It will continue to perpetuate low wages for South Africans and those that shout “Abahambe” know this very well. Documentation will make it easy because these migrants will see it in their best interest to unionise and fight for a better wage. You set laws that everyone covered by this amnesty cannot apply for South African citizenship as they do in the United Arab Emirates because this should only be done to clear a long running problem to help deal with border control properly without losing focus because of those already in South Africa. Ministers cannot continue to pretend to be activists when they now sit on the cabinet table, if nothing changes during the five years they are in power, they would have failed, they cannot shout “Abahambe” again in 2029. Business cannot continue to benefit from the misery of poor Zimbabweans because of the refusal to document them, it is the South African citizen that will suffer more, deportation has failed to solve this problem. It is time for strong and reflective leadership that makes tough but sustainable decisions that have a long-term ability to resolve this issue. South Africans will have another opportunity to send a strong message in 2026, they should use it and not make the politicians continue to use this dysfunctionality continue at the expense of the South African citizen and the desperate undocumented immigrants. It is easy to control the border when you have cleaned up the existing problem in the country first, it requires men and women in leadership with a spine. If you want to discuss any issues arising from this article you can e-mail me at hopewell2@post.harvard.edu
4:40

The South African Immigration Crisis And How It Can Fixed With A Long Term Solution The political and economic chaos in neighbouring countries around South Africa benefits businesses and opportunistic politicians in South Africa. That is why business doesn’t condemn the abuse of human rights, rigging of elections and corrupt rule in countries like Zimbabwe, it is not in their best interest to do so because they benefit from the outcomes of failed rule in Zimbabwe. How does this work? Zimbabwe’s unemployment rate is 95%, it has the highest inflation in the world (1266% per year), hospitals have collapsed, and it is hell on earth without any social welfare system due to the continued looting of public funds by the Zimbabwean tyrant and his goons. This pushes desperate and unemployed Zimbabweans to cross the border into South Africa to find a job, healthcare, and a better life. When they cross over into South Africa, either legally or illegally, and overstay, they become vulnerable to local businesses which offer them employment paying very low wages, they take the jobs because they are desperate to survive. Businesses or farm owners in Limpopo or on wine farms in Cape Town badly underpay them, knowing they have no recourse to the law because they are illegal, something that they cannot do to a South African citizen who is protected by the law. As this happens, wages drop because cheap labour is now available, and it is not unionised so they cannot fight for any rights to fair wages. These Zimbabweans, and Africans in general, will take anything to survive and see another day, they have families to feed back in their countries of origin. This disempowers the South African worker, who cannot negotiate for higher wages because that power has been eroded and taken away by the availability of cheap labour. Businesses, in turn, tell the locals to go hang if they try to negotiate for a living wage because they have cheap labour readily available, the illegal immigrant needs the job. The locals (South Africans) get angry and fight these illegal immigrants in their communities, leading to the emergence of vigilante groups and peripheral opportunistic political actors who exploit this to gain votes from locals who feel stifled and desperate in their own country. Cosmetic, choreographed police and immigration raids are carried out to appease the restive poor and unemployed South Africans. These illegal immigrants are deported on a Monday, and by Friday, they are back. This is known as the revolving door. The border officials are so corrupt that they facilitate this revolving door because they profit from it, so you cannot currently use immigration control to deal with this on land borders where people come by road. Some illegal immigrants do not even leave South Africa because the police who arrest them will also accept bribes. In this heated emotional debate in South Africa, no real solutions are proposed because opportunistic politicians simply shout “ABAHAMBE,” get some votes and repeat the same to remain relevant in public discourse. It is funny how it is so easy to appease voters with such empty slogans that do not bring any tangible solutions, but the desperate voter is fickle, they fall for anything. What these politicians do not say, or choose to ignore, is that when these illegals go, they will return the next day. It is an inconvenient conversation for politicians because it undermines their ability to mobilise votes. The root cause of this immigration crisis lies in Zimbabwean and African politics driven by corrupt rule, the abuse of human rights, and rigged elections. President Cyril Ramaphosa and his ruling ANC political party publicly support the authors of this crisis in Zimbabwe, so the root cause cannot be addressed at the source now until South Africans have an honest family conversation to deal with this once and for all. Unemployed Zimbabweans feel that the ANC and its government have a moral obligation to let them come because they are supporting corrupt rule in Zimbabwe, and they are doing so publicly. This is compounded by the cowardice of Zimbabweans and the dearth of any meaningful opposition leadership in that country. Yet we have a serios crisis. So, what do we do about it to resolve the illegal immigration nightmare in South Africa, which is driving wages down and enriching businesses and the political class? Someone must put meaningful proposals on the table because this has been with us for decades, and it remains unresolved. These proposals should not be rooted in emotional discourse, but practical realities that confront South Africa. This crisis can’t be resolved through political rhetoric or “Abahambe” or any empty Pan-African slogans which ignore the ongoing realities. Real leaders provide practical solutions and don’t do it for social media retweets or likes, but for solid and long term resolutions that that will fix the crisis. We know that wages are being pushed down for South Africans due to the availability of cheap labour from illegal immigrants, and that these illegal immigrants cannot demand better wages because they cannot approach the authorities or unionise, given their illegal immigration status. The only way out, to help local South African workers who refuse to work for a pittance in restaurants, and rightly so, is to legalise those already in South Africa, so that the authorities know who they are. You implement regulations ensuring that these workers can be employed and pay taxes, but also make sure that jobs must be offered to South Africans first, they do that in Zimbabwe with the little jobs available, and that is a standard practice the world over. Where no South African is willing to take up the job, it can be offered to a documented migrant, who will be paying taxes. It will now be easier to negotiate for better wages because all workers local and migrant will now be unionised, something that big business and the political class privately do not want because it takes away the power to undermine wage negotiations and to campaign for votes respectively. Wages will rise for South African workers because everyone will then be able to negotiate for a better wage without fear of being deported. Any company caught employing illegal immigrants will be shut down immediately using laws created to deal with this problem of greedy business owners taking advantage of illegal immigration, with all the money in its bank accounts seized by the State. This will stop the employment of anyone illegal and undocumented and will provide cover for those given an amnesty for documentation. I want to make this clear, South Africans will never be able to negotiate for a living wage if there are illegal immigrants, politicians will lie to the citizens but this is the unpalatable truth. Once this is resolved, opportunistic politicians will then focus on service delivery rather than gaslighting poor South Africans with “Abahambe,” knowing that when the illegals go, they will return tomorrow morning. When illegal immigrants are documented and have bank accounts, they will begin to pay taxes and can also become entrepreneurial, creating businesses that will employ more South Africans and contribute to economic growth of South Africa. Documenting illegals and gathering their biometric data will also reduce crime because undocumented immigrants can commit crimes and evade detection, as the South African state currently does not know who they are or where they live. When they work legally or open small businesses, they will contribute to the South African fiscus, which will fund the public hospitals they use and the schools their children attend. The revolving door applies to Africans who need visas too, they are deported to Nigeria, they acquire a new identity, fly to Zimbabwe and come to South Africa by road where they pay border officials a bribe and get it in. Zimbabwe is no longer a foreign policy issue only for the South African government, it is a domestic issue as well because of illegal immigration that has brought many Zimbabweans into South Africa. It is not their fault, they are also victims of a corrupt government and each time they try to vote out the regime in Harare, the ANC publicly support rigged elections and give diplomatic cover to the Zimbabwean tyrant Emmerson Mnangagwa. Refusing to document illegals hoping that deportations will solve the problem demonstrates incompetence and ignorance to how illegal immigration works. It will continue to perpetuate low wages for South Africans and those that shout “Abahambe” know this very well. Documentation will make it easy because these migrants will see it in their best interest to unionise and fight for a better wage. You set laws that everyone covered by this amnesty cannot apply for South African citizenship as they do in the United Arab Emirates because this should only be done to clear a long running problem to help deal with border control properly without losing focus because of those already in South Africa. Ministers cannot continue to pretend to be activists when they now sit on the cabinet table, if nothing changes during the five years they are in power, they would have failed, they cannot shout “Abahambe” again in 2029. Business cannot continue to benefit from the misery of poor Zimbabweans because of the refusal to document them, it is the South African citizen that will suffer more, deportation has failed to solve this problem. It is time for strong and reflective leadership that makes tough but sustainable decisions that have a long-term ability to resolve this issue. South Africans will have another opportunity to send a strong message in 2026, they should use it and not make the politicians continue to use this dysfunctionality continue at the expense of the South African citizen and the desperate undocumented immigrants. It is easy to control the border when you have cleaned up the existing problem in the country first, it requires men and women in leadership with a spine. If you want to discuss any issues arising from this article you can e-mail me at [email protected]

Hopewell Chin’ono

81,811 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Friedberg’s Ideal Immigration Test: Worker or Welfare? (Or Makers vs Takers) “I'm all about discerning immigration, not on the lines of some cultural definition, but really around that simple framing of are you going to get social support services or are you going to work? Going back to my makers vs takers point, if the primary motivation for an individual to come to this country is to be given benefits, to be given payments, to be given social services, to be given support, I think that that person should be denied immigration. If the primary motivation for the individual to come to the United States is to work to progress themselves, to become a maker, to create things, to work in such a way that they can generate income, save capital, buy things, advance their family's position because they are denied those rights due to the tyranny of the place that they're coming from, then they should be granted immigration status to come to this country and contribute. Because at the end of the day, what people may not like to hear, which is the truth, is that every single one of those people is actually net positive in growing our economy. And everyone thinks it's a zero-sum game with respect to jobs in the United States, and we shouldn't let people into this country that create jobs. But the fundamental truth is that anyone that is productive, meaning they create more value than they take in, grows the economy and more jobs get created, and overall, we all benefit from having those individuals here in this country. And by the way, if you are going to work, you are going to culturally assimilate, because that is what the United States is based on, which is productivity, work hard, create things, and have individual agency, have the ability to progress yourself in this world, in this society. And if you take advantage of that opportunity, you're going to love the American ideals that this country was founded upon.”
1:42

Friedberg’s Ideal Immigration Test: Worker or Welfare? (Or Makers vs Takers) “I'm all about discerning immigration, not on the lines of some cultural definition, but really around that simple framing of are you going to get social support services or are you going to work? Going back to my makers vs takers point, if the primary motivation for an individual to come to this country is to be given benefits, to be given payments, to be given social services, to be given support, I think that that person should be denied immigration. If the primary motivation for the individual to come to the United States is to work to progress themselves, to become a maker, to create things, to work in such a way that they can generate income, save capital, buy things, advance their family's position because they are denied those rights due to the tyranny of the place that they're coming from, then they should be granted immigration status to come to this country and contribute. Because at the end of the day, what people may not like to hear, which is the truth, is that every single one of those people is actually net positive in growing our economy. And everyone thinks it's a zero-sum game with respect to jobs in the United States, and we shouldn't let people into this country that create jobs. But the fundamental truth is that anyone that is productive, meaning they create more value than they take in, grows the economy and more jobs get created, and overall, we all benefit from having those individuals here in this country. And by the way, if you are going to work, you are going to culturally assimilate, because that is what the United States is based on, which is productivity, work hard, create things, and have individual agency, have the ability to progress yourself in this world, in this society. And if you take advantage of that opportunity, you're going to love the American ideals that this country was founded upon.”

The All-In Podcast

54,862 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

“Targeted immigration is good … that’s good immigration. It’s targeted, it’s small, and it improves the standard of living”. I’m afraid on this one I vehemently disagree with Rupert Lowe MP. Here’s why …. Britain currently has 6.5 million people on out of work benefits and has some of the lowest automation/robotics rates (and therefore productivity rates) in the developed world. If there is a shortage of a certain skill and you allow that skill to be imported, even if you think it’s just for the short term, it encourages businesses not to innovate or to increase wages to attract talent off of welfare and into work. We have rising unemployment and low economic activity rates so there is tremendous slack in the economy in terms of labour supply. There is no need to have any immigration to plug that gap. In a world of full employment, high economic activity rates, low welfare dependency, and high productivity I could see a scenario in which some temporary workers from Anglo/European countries becomes sensible. However, we are decades away from that world and even if we weren’t we should be encouraging the diaspora to return home with a massive incentive program rather than taking any immigration outside of that sphere. That would more than plug any shortages we had. Which gets me back to my point. We don’t need any immigration at all. We never have and never will.
0:34

“Targeted immigration is good … that’s good immigration. It’s targeted, it’s small, and it improves the standard of living”. I’m afraid on this one I vehemently disagree with Rupert Lowe MP. Here’s why …. Britain currently has 6.5 million people on out of work benefits and has some of the lowest automation/robotics rates (and therefore productivity rates) in the developed world. If there is a shortage of a certain skill and you allow that skill to be imported, even if you think it’s just for the short term, it encourages businesses not to innovate or to increase wages to attract talent off of welfare and into work. We have rising unemployment and low economic activity rates so there is tremendous slack in the economy in terms of labour supply. There is no need to have any immigration to plug that gap. In a world of full employment, high economic activity rates, low welfare dependency, and high productivity I could see a scenario in which some temporary workers from Anglo/European countries becomes sensible. However, we are decades away from that world and even if we weren’t we should be encouraging the diaspora to return home with a massive incentive program rather than taking any immigration outside of that sphere. That would more than plug any shortages we had. Which gets me back to my point. We don’t need any immigration at all. We never have and never will.

Wolf 🐺

16,157 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

WATCH: BLM activist backs Trump, wants illegals to leave America 'Big Mike' says the U.S. is only for those born there and that undocumented immigrants should leave. A Black Lives Matter activist spoke with Rebel News in a scathing interview on the anti-ICE demonstrations. He believes there are "a lot of bad apples" among immigrants and that those who crossed the border illegally should go back to their countries and return the right way, regardless of their origin. The activist says he voted for Donald Trump in the most recent presidential elections. In contrast, another person at the protest states they are there to support immigrants seeking a better life, including family and friends who cannot speak for themselves. They advocate for equal rights and encourage people to protest. A third person expressed love for President Claudia Sheinbaum for supporting deported individuals and wanting to give them benefits in Mexico. They believe in no borders and suggest everyone worldwide should have equal rights. During the protest, "Big Mike" asserted that the U.S. is only for those born there and that undocumented immigrants should leave and return legally. A masked protester countered that the U.S. is also their motherland, acknowledging the difficulty of legal immigration. “Big Mike” claims President candidate Kamala Harris enabled illegal immigrants to get IDs and that these individuals are involved in crimes like rape, citing specific instances and stating that ICE apprehended and then released some, who then returned. The protester counters that these are a “few bad apples” and that most immigrants are seeking a better life, often due to U.S. actions in their home countries. The first speaker insists on legal immigration.
20:25

WATCH: BLM activist backs Trump, wants illegals to leave America 'Big Mike' says the U.S. is only for those born there and that undocumented immigrants should leave. A Black Lives Matter activist spoke with Rebel News in a scathing interview on the anti-ICE demonstrations. He believes there are "a lot of bad apples" among immigrants and that those who crossed the border illegally should go back to their countries and return the right way, regardless of their origin. The activist says he voted for Donald Trump in the most recent presidential elections. In contrast, another person at the protest states they are there to support immigrants seeking a better life, including family and friends who cannot speak for themselves. They advocate for equal rights and encourage people to protest. A third person expressed love for President Claudia Sheinbaum for supporting deported individuals and wanting to give them benefits in Mexico. They believe in no borders and suggest everyone worldwide should have equal rights. During the protest, "Big Mike" asserted that the U.S. is only for those born there and that undocumented immigrants should leave and return legally. A masked protester countered that the U.S. is also their motherland, acknowledging the difficulty of legal immigration. “Big Mike” claims President candidate Kamala Harris enabled illegal immigrants to get IDs and that these individuals are involved in crimes like rape, citing specific instances and stating that ICE apprehended and then released some, who then returned. The protester counters that these are a “few bad apples” and that most immigrants are seeking a better life, often due to U.S. actions in their home countries. The first speaker insists on legal immigration.

Rebel News

21,500 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

It’s Happening ‼️ The Donald Trump Administration finalized a rule rescinding Biden regulations, immigrants who have used welfare can now be DENIED Green Cards “That includes food stamps, Medicaid, housing vouchers, and more. The policy was first implemented in early 2020 by President Trump, but it was reversed after Joe Biden became president. It will be formally reinstated” But don’t let the Democrat Party lie to you, this is how it always should have been, this was our policy before Democrats started the welfare state ‘The public charge ground of inadmissibility’ has existed in US immigration law for over a century under the ‘Immigration and Nationality Act.’ It allows denial of visas or green cards if an applicant is deemed likely to become primarily dependent on the government for support Trump’s first term simply expanded the rule to consider a broader range of non-cash benefits like Medicaid, food stamps and housing assistance, plus factors like age, health, income, education, and English proficiency It does not automatically deny anyone for using benefits but now there is more discretion by immigration officers to make these decisions based on all circumstances
1:52

It’s Happening ‼️ The Donald Trump Administration finalized a rule rescinding Biden regulations, immigrants who have used welfare can now be DENIED Green Cards “That includes food stamps, Medicaid, housing vouchers, and more. The policy was first implemented in early 2020 by President Trump, but it was reversed after Joe Biden became president. It will be formally reinstated” But don’t let the Democrat Party lie to you, this is how it always should have been, this was our policy before Democrats started the welfare state ‘The public charge ground of inadmissibility’ has existed in US immigration law for over a century under the ‘Immigration and Nationality Act.’ It allows denial of visas or green cards if an applicant is deemed likely to become primarily dependent on the government for support Trump’s first term simply expanded the rule to consider a broader range of non-cash benefits like Medicaid, food stamps and housing assistance, plus factors like age, health, income, education, and English proficiency It does not automatically deny anyone for using benefits but now there is more discretion by immigration officers to make these decisions based on all circumstances

Wall Street Apes

276,185 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Bill Clinton speech in 1995 “All Americans, not only in the States most heavily affected, but in every place in this country, are rightly disturbed by the large numbers of illegal aliens entering our country.” “The jobs they hold might otherwise be held by citizens or legal immigrants. The public service, they use imposed burdens on our taxpayers.” “That's why our administration has moved aggressively to secure our borders more by hiring a record number of new border guards by deporting twice as many criminal aliens as ever before by cracking down on illegal hiring by barring welfare benefits to illegal aliens.” “We will try to do more to speed the deportation of illegal aliens who are arrested for crimes to better identify illegal aliens in the work force” “It is wrong and ultimately self-defeating for a nation of immigrants to permit the kind of abuse of our immigration laws we have seen in recent years, and we must do more to stop it”
0:59

Bill Clinton speech in 1995 “All Americans, not only in the States most heavily affected, but in every place in this country, are rightly disturbed by the large numbers of illegal aliens entering our country.” “The jobs they hold might otherwise be held by citizens or legal immigrants. The public service, they use imposed burdens on our taxpayers.” “That's why our administration has moved aggressively to secure our borders more by hiring a record number of new border guards by deporting twice as many criminal aliens as ever before by cracking down on illegal hiring by barring welfare benefits to illegal aliens.” “We will try to do more to speed the deportation of illegal aliens who are arrested for crimes to better identify illegal aliens in the work force” “It is wrong and ultimately self-defeating for a nation of immigrants to permit the kind of abuse of our immigration laws we have seen in recent years, and we must do more to stop it”

Wall Street Apes

105,204 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Congressman Brandon Gill says the reason Democrats are fighting so hard against ICE is because their political power comes from mass migration and putting illegals on taxpayer funded welfare He says it’s all about illegals voting Democrat “President Trump is doing exactly what the American people elected him to do. Securing the border, immigration enforcement was the single biggest issue of the past election cycle. But Democrats know that their political support comes from mass migration. It comes from an unchecked welfare state. That's why you saw the fraud in Somalia. Democrats have been betting for a long time that they can open up our borders, flood our country with illegal aliens who will impact congressional apportionment, and ultimately, they believe, be able to vote. That's why they are so dead set on stopping what the president is doing and simply upholding our laws because that is their political path to power.”
0:37

Congressman Brandon Gill says the reason Democrats are fighting so hard against ICE is because their political power comes from mass migration and putting illegals on taxpayer funded welfare He says it’s all about illegals voting Democrat “President Trump is doing exactly what the American people elected him to do. Securing the border, immigration enforcement was the single biggest issue of the past election cycle. But Democrats know that their political support comes from mass migration. It comes from an unchecked welfare state. That's why you saw the fraud in Somalia. Democrats have been betting for a long time that they can open up our borders, flood our country with illegal aliens who will impact congressional apportionment, and ultimately, they believe, be able to vote. That's why they are so dead set on stopping what the president is doing and simply upholding our laws because that is their political path to power.”

Wall Street Apes

29,541 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Spain on the Brink: Open Borders Unleash a Criminal Invasion, Vox Sounds the Alarm "This invasion cannot continue. It is not sustainable, nor is it justifiable." "They come here not looking for work but to exploit Spain’s welfare system." "What we are seeing is an increase in illegal immigration of more than 100% this year compared to last year." "The Canary Islanders are suffering an invasion they did not provoke, they do not encourage, and they did not call for." "Imagine what will happen when all this distribution of illegal immigration, along with the conflicts it brings, is spread throughout the rest of the nation." "In Sweden, they realized they made a mistake. In France, they’ve already realized they made a mistake. In England, we still don’t fully understand why they remain so stubborn about this mistake." "Spain’s fate is very similar to Sweden’s, Belgium’s, France’s, and England’s." "Illegal immigrants come for the subsidies, not to find a job. They come looking for assistance, something that allows them to live off absolutely nothing." "Vox will never deceive the Spaniards or anyone who wants to come here to work legally and in an orderly manner." "We don’t have a future for them. I wish we did, but it’s abundantly clear that we don’t." Left-wing leaders are flooding our countries with migrants who have no intention of contributing, just living off our hard work. They aren’t here to build a future but to exploit our systems, erode our culture, and strain our services. This isn’t accidental; it’s a calculated strategy to weaken us from within. Read the article here:
4:05

Spain on the Brink: Open Borders Unleash a Criminal Invasion, Vox Sounds the Alarm "This invasion cannot continue. It is not sustainable, nor is it justifiable." "They come here not looking for work but to exploit Spain’s welfare system." "What we are seeing is an increase in illegal immigration of more than 100% this year compared to last year." "The Canary Islanders are suffering an invasion they did not provoke, they do not encourage, and they did not call for." "Imagine what will happen when all this distribution of illegal immigration, along with the conflicts it brings, is spread throughout the rest of the nation." "In Sweden, they realized they made a mistake. In France, they’ve already realized they made a mistake. In England, we still don’t fully understand why they remain so stubborn about this mistake." "Spain’s fate is very similar to Sweden’s, Belgium’s, France’s, and England’s." "Illegal immigrants come for the subsidies, not to find a job. They come looking for assistance, something that allows them to live off absolutely nothing." "Vox will never deceive the Spaniards or anyone who wants to come here to work legally and in an orderly manner." "We don’t have a future for them. I wish we did, but it’s abundantly clear that we don’t." Left-wing leaders are flooding our countries with migrants who have no intention of contributing, just living off our hard work. They aren’t here to build a future but to exploit our systems, erode our culture, and strain our services. This isn’t accidental; it’s a calculated strategy to weaken us from within. Read the article here:

Amy Mek

25,209 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr