Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Indian kitchens overflow with powerful bitters: Turmeric (Haridra), Fenugreek seeds & leaves, Cumin & Carom seeds, Bitter gourd… Each has its place, each has its power. But here’s the catch: too much bitter spoils the balance. Ayurveda teaches harmony of Vata, Pitta, Kapha. No doctor prescribes neem every day....

Ayudhika1310's profile picture

Āyudhika

24,758 subscribers

53,467 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

EssenGesundheit & Wellness
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

🪱 Wormwood may not charm you with sweetness, but it doesn’t need to. This intensely bitter herb is a trusted ally for those brave enough to walk the path of deep healing and spiritual reclamation. 🪱 Artemisia absinthium has been honored as a ritual tool, used to banish parasites of both the physical and energetic kind. Its bitterness signals the body to wake up, stimulating digestive enzymes, bile flow, and liver detox pathways. In Traditional European Herbalism, wormwood was often used in spring detox formulas to rekindle the digestive fire after long winters of heavy food and stagnation. Beyond the gut, wormwood speaks to the psyche. Dream pillows, incense, and herbal baths with wormwood were thought to aid in contacting the spirit world, remembering dreams, and bringing hidden emotions to the surface. In magical traditions, it’s often called upon for protection, psychic vision, and invoking the shadow—those parts of us we’ve exiled or buried. Wormwood’s infamous connection to absinthe gave it a mysterious, almost dangerous allure. But used respectfully and appropriately, it becomes a guide, especially when clarity, boundaries, or deep release are needed. Healing isn’t always about love and light; sometimes, it’s about seeing clearly in the dark. This plant medicine reminds us: Bitterness is a teacher, and not all healing tastes sweet. How do you honor the bitter in your life? 🌿🖤✨
0:50

🪱 Wormwood may not charm you with sweetness, but it doesn’t need to. This intensely bitter herb is a trusted ally for those brave enough to walk the path of deep healing and spiritual reclamation. 🪱 Artemisia absinthium has been honored as a ritual tool, used to banish parasites of both the physical and energetic kind. Its bitterness signals the body to wake up, stimulating digestive enzymes, bile flow, and liver detox pathways. In Traditional European Herbalism, wormwood was often used in spring detox formulas to rekindle the digestive fire after long winters of heavy food and stagnation. Beyond the gut, wormwood speaks to the psyche. Dream pillows, incense, and herbal baths with wormwood were thought to aid in contacting the spirit world, remembering dreams, and bringing hidden emotions to the surface. In magical traditions, it’s often called upon for protection, psychic vision, and invoking the shadow—those parts of us we’ve exiled or buried. Wormwood’s infamous connection to absinthe gave it a mysterious, almost dangerous allure. But used respectfully and appropriately, it becomes a guide, especially when clarity, boundaries, or deep release are needed. Healing isn’t always about love and light; sometimes, it’s about seeing clearly in the dark. This plant medicine reminds us: Bitterness is a teacher, and not all healing tastes sweet. How do you honor the bitter in your life? 🌿🖤✨

Barbara Oneill

83,607 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Reasonable Democrats are going to have to get off their couches, roll up their sleeves and start organizing real voters on the ground. We can no longer rely only on TV ads, digital spend and endorsements. Just donating from afar and complaining about the DSA won’t cut it. The DSA (Democratic Socialists of America) can beat moderates in a growing number of blue strongholds. Why? Because the DSA has patiently built an army of on-the-ground organizers — who go to meetings, help each other, study together and THEN work to turn out voters on Election Day. That army grows every day — election or no election. Their investment in real people grows (and compounds) with each election cycle. The DSA has a bigger army, every time, win or lose. But at the end of any election, all moderate Dems have for their efforts is a bunch of ads that nobody will ever see again. That’s not going to work anymore. If you are a Democrat who believes in opportunity, dignity and democracy for all — but you don’t hate rich people, cops, free enterprise, the West, Israel and the United States of America — I’m talking to you!
1:08

Reasonable Democrats are going to have to get off their couches, roll up their sleeves and start organizing real voters on the ground. We can no longer rely only on TV ads, digital spend and endorsements. Just donating from afar and complaining about the DSA won’t cut it. The DSA (Democratic Socialists of America) can beat moderates in a growing number of blue strongholds. Why? Because the DSA has patiently built an army of on-the-ground organizers — who go to meetings, help each other, study together and THEN work to turn out voters on Election Day. That army grows every day — election or no election. Their investment in real people grows (and compounds) with each election cycle. The DSA has a bigger army, every time, win or lose. But at the end of any election, all moderate Dems have for their efforts is a bunch of ads that nobody will ever see again. That’s not going to work anymore. If you are a Democrat who believes in opportunity, dignity and democracy for all — but you don’t hate rich people, cops, free enterprise, the West, Israel and the United States of America — I’m talking to you!

Van Jones

620,727 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

When the Womb Whispers: And Other Things We Don't Say About Fibroids WHEN WOULD WE GET THE CURE FOR FIBROIDS? Dear Ini Dima-Okojie Thank you. For speaking. For not whispering. Because there is something about fibroids that turns even the boldest of us into secret-keepers. And yet, how can a thing so common still carry so much shame? How can one in three Black women walk around with wombs that grow knots of muscle, and still we act as though we don’t know? As though silence will make them disappear. Let’s talk about fibroids. Not as curses. Not as village vengeance served cold by a bitter aunt with a long memory. Not as punishment for being too ambitious, too beautiful, too unmarried. But as what they are...vbenign tumours, muscular growths born of the very womb that once carried our ancestors. And yet, we treat them like shame. Like things to hide in brown paper bags, behind locked clinic doors, in hushed family meetings. We do not name them because we think naming gives them power. But silence, not words, is what gives shame its wings. Some women carry fibroids like invisible scars. Some carry them in their periods...those relentless rivers of blood. Others carry them in the way their bellies swell, round and taut, inviting strangers to smile and ask, “when are you due?” And how, how do you tell a stranger that you are due for nothing but another scan? No, fibroids are not death sentences. They are not infertility tattoos stamped by fate. And yes, women with fibroids carry babies. They birth joy. They raise nations. But sometimes fibroids demand intervention. Sometimes they crowd the womb like unwanted guests, pushing and pressing until there is no room left. And sometimes, we must act. With medicine. With surgery. With science. Not with soaked roots or shouted prayers. Because God, even when He heals, does not despise knowledge. And your body...your glorious, stubborn, wondrous body...is not a place for experiments. Not by self-acclaimed herbalists. Not by untrained hands. Not by those who say “let’s try this” without understanding your anatomy. There are treatments. Not miracles, no. But measured, methodical medicine. There is keyhole surgery. There is open surgery. There is robotic precision. And sometimes, the most loving treatment is no treatment at all. And to families... Please stop calling her “barren” in the middle of your Sunday rice. Stop folding your lips around pity and disappointment. Stop tying shame around her waist like a wrapper. Because fibroids grow in silence, but they also shrink in love. Because shame is not a cure, and gossip is not a diagnosis. Dear woman, Your story does not end in fibroids. This is not your final line, not your final loss. You are still becoming. You are still woman...full, fertile, whole. So, share this. With a sister. With a cousin. With the aunt who says, “it’s just delay.” Because we are only as healed as our loudest silences. And if you must whisper, then let your whisper be this: “Fibroids do not define me.” 📹: InidimaOkojie | IG
1:57

When the Womb Whispers: And Other Things We Don't Say About Fibroids WHEN WOULD WE GET THE CURE FOR FIBROIDS? Dear Ini Dima-Okojie Thank you. For speaking. For not whispering. Because there is something about fibroids that turns even the boldest of us into secret-keepers. And yet, how can a thing so common still carry so much shame? How can one in three Black women walk around with wombs that grow knots of muscle, and still we act as though we don’t know? As though silence will make them disappear. Let’s talk about fibroids. Not as curses. Not as village vengeance served cold by a bitter aunt with a long memory. Not as punishment for being too ambitious, too beautiful, too unmarried. But as what they are...vbenign tumours, muscular growths born of the very womb that once carried our ancestors. And yet, we treat them like shame. Like things to hide in brown paper bags, behind locked clinic doors, in hushed family meetings. We do not name them because we think naming gives them power. But silence, not words, is what gives shame its wings. Some women carry fibroids like invisible scars. Some carry them in their periods...those relentless rivers of blood. Others carry them in the way their bellies swell, round and taut, inviting strangers to smile and ask, “when are you due?” And how, how do you tell a stranger that you are due for nothing but another scan? No, fibroids are not death sentences. They are not infertility tattoos stamped by fate. And yes, women with fibroids carry babies. They birth joy. They raise nations. But sometimes fibroids demand intervention. Sometimes they crowd the womb like unwanted guests, pushing and pressing until there is no room left. And sometimes, we must act. With medicine. With surgery. With science. Not with soaked roots or shouted prayers. Because God, even when He heals, does not despise knowledge. And your body...your glorious, stubborn, wondrous body...is not a place for experiments. Not by self-acclaimed herbalists. Not by untrained hands. Not by those who say “let’s try this” without understanding your anatomy. There are treatments. Not miracles, no. But measured, methodical medicine. There is keyhole surgery. There is open surgery. There is robotic precision. And sometimes, the most loving treatment is no treatment at all. And to families... Please stop calling her “barren” in the middle of your Sunday rice. Stop folding your lips around pity and disappointment. Stop tying shame around her waist like a wrapper. Because fibroids grow in silence, but they also shrink in love. Because shame is not a cure, and gossip is not a diagnosis. Dear woman, Your story does not end in fibroids. This is not your final line, not your final loss. You are still becoming. You are still woman...full, fertile, whole. So, share this. With a sister. With a cousin. With the aunt who says, “it’s just delay.” Because we are only as healed as our loudest silences. And if you must whisper, then let your whisper be this: “Fibroids do not define me.” 📹: InidimaOkojie | IG

Dr. Ose Etiobhio

224,233 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Among the most famous works of Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart, Eine kleine Nachtmusik is often regarded as one of the quintessential examples of the Classical style. Over generations, the piece has not only appeared frequently on concert stages but has also been widely used in the teaching of music history and aesthetics. What gives it such a special place is not technical display or overwhelming effects, but its ability to make listeners immediately perceive a clear musical order from the very first notes. The first impression is one of structural clarity. As soon as the opening theme sounds, the musical phrases are organized into balanced and coherent units. Each musical idea has a clear beginning, a process of development, and a natural point of rest before moving on to the next phrase. Listeners therefore do not merely receive individual melodies; they quickly sense a purposeful forward motion. The music advances with the natural flow of a well-organized dialogue, in which each phrase prepares the next while simultaneously completing the meaning of the one before it. What is remarkable is that Mozart does not create appeal through complexity. The opening theme is built from short, easily recognizable motifs that are continually developed through subtle variations in rhythm, pitch, and harmony. New ideas do not deny or replace previous material; instead, they seem to emerge naturally from what the listener has just heard. As a result, the entire movement maintains a feeling of being both familiar and constantly in motion, avoiding both monotony and any sense of fragmentation. If melody brings vitality to the surface of the music, the balance of the whole work is sustained by the relationship between the voices. No single instrument tries to detach itself from the ensemble to become the absolute center. The string parts continuously support, respond to, and complement one another, creating a texture in which each element retains its own role while serving the unity of the entire piece. Listeners thus perceive not only the beauty of individual melodic lines, but also the connections between them as parts of a single whole. Harmony also plays a decisive role in this impression. Points of tension are always carefully prepared and logically led toward resolution. Whenever the music moves away from the tonal center, Mozart simultaneously constructs a path that brings it back to a state of balance. Therefore, although the movement is always full of energy, listeners rarely feel unsettled. Motion and stability are not opposites; they coexist within a unified structure. From these details, the organizing principle of the entire work gradually emerges. Mozart does not construct beauty by choosing between power and elegance, between motion and order, or between diversity and unity. He allows these seemingly opposing elements to coexist and support one another. The melody is always moving yet never loses direction. The individual parts maintain their own character without separating from the whole. Harmony creates tension but always points toward balance. Every element develops, yet all development occurs within an organized structure. Thus, the enduring vitality of Eine kleine Nachtmusik comes not only from its memorable melodies or its elegant surface beauty. The long-term value of the work lies in the way Mozart organizes all the musical material around a consistent principle: beauty does not arise when all elements are the same, but when each element fulfills its role completely within a shared order. It is precisely this unity of structure, motion, and balance that has led generations of classical music lovers to cherish the piece as one of the most representative expressions of Western Classical art.
24:19

Among the most famous works of Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart, Eine kleine Nachtmusik is often regarded as one of the quintessential examples of the Classical style. Over generations, the piece has not only appeared frequently on concert stages but has also been widely used in the teaching of music history and aesthetics. What gives it such a special place is not technical display or overwhelming effects, but its ability to make listeners immediately perceive a clear musical order from the very first notes. The first impression is one of structural clarity. As soon as the opening theme sounds, the musical phrases are organized into balanced and coherent units. Each musical idea has a clear beginning, a process of development, and a natural point of rest before moving on to the next phrase. Listeners therefore do not merely receive individual melodies; they quickly sense a purposeful forward motion. The music advances with the natural flow of a well-organized dialogue, in which each phrase prepares the next while simultaneously completing the meaning of the one before it. What is remarkable is that Mozart does not create appeal through complexity. The opening theme is built from short, easily recognizable motifs that are continually developed through subtle variations in rhythm, pitch, and harmony. New ideas do not deny or replace previous material; instead, they seem to emerge naturally from what the listener has just heard. As a result, the entire movement maintains a feeling of being both familiar and constantly in motion, avoiding both monotony and any sense of fragmentation. If melody brings vitality to the surface of the music, the balance of the whole work is sustained by the relationship between the voices. No single instrument tries to detach itself from the ensemble to become the absolute center. The string parts continuously support, respond to, and complement one another, creating a texture in which each element retains its own role while serving the unity of the entire piece. Listeners thus perceive not only the beauty of individual melodic lines, but also the connections between them as parts of a single whole. Harmony also plays a decisive role in this impression. Points of tension are always carefully prepared and logically led toward resolution. Whenever the music moves away from the tonal center, Mozart simultaneously constructs a path that brings it back to a state of balance. Therefore, although the movement is always full of energy, listeners rarely feel unsettled. Motion and stability are not opposites; they coexist within a unified structure. From these details, the organizing principle of the entire work gradually emerges. Mozart does not construct beauty by choosing between power and elegance, between motion and order, or between diversity and unity. He allows these seemingly opposing elements to coexist and support one another. The melody is always moving yet never loses direction. The individual parts maintain their own character without separating from the whole. Harmony creates tension but always points toward balance. Every element develops, yet all development occurs within an organized structure. Thus, the enduring vitality of Eine kleine Nachtmusik comes not only from its memorable melodies or its elegant surface beauty. The long-term value of the work lies in the way Mozart organizes all the musical material around a consistent principle: beauty does not arise when all elements are the same, but when each element fulfills its role completely within a shared order. It is precisely this unity of structure, motion, and balance that has led generations of classical music lovers to cherish the piece as one of the most representative expressions of Western Classical art.

🎼🌺Music Love♥️

19,374 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

When the young generation embrace a pseudoscience like Ayurveda. There is a huge problem in India. You may not realize it, but it is an open secret. Normalizing and glorifying “healthy alcohol consumption” seems to be the biggest social media tool that young content makers are cashing in from an ill-informed public. As a clinical Hepatologist who writes off close to five death summaries of young men aged 25 to 40 years almost every week – young productive men who have died due to alcohol use disorder and liver failure, leaving behind aging parents, creating widows or fatherless children, I sometimes feel like calling it quits. Maybe it is time to leave everyone to fend for themselves, because there is a limit to which me and other physicians can help and hope to bring a change in the people against a tsunami of disinformation that is directly harming the public health. It is like the Hydra. Cut off one disinformation, two others on the same topic comes in. And then we have young men like Shashank Sharma, this Instagram content creator and possibly an Ayurveda practitioner, who has made this video called “How to consume alcohol safely" according to the ancient traditional Indian (nonsense called) Ayurveda. This one video is enough for you to realize that Ayurveda is a pseudoscience that harms. It is a destructive professional choice for women and men studying it, because it reduces intellectual capacity, kills logical thinking, and murders rationality that students acquire in high school. The Government actively promotes it, runs large public-funded colleges to teach it to students who do not get good ranks in medical entrance examinations, but are dying to have the “Dr.” title in front of their names. Even after passing the course, the majority call themselves “doctors” instead of the traditionally given title of “Vaidya.” It is a profession solely built on the foundations of insecurity and inferiority, which is why you see Ayurveda practitioners always attacking medical science and modern medicine in India. They are trained to become blinded to truth, rabid against facts and hurtful towards those who educate the public on the harms of alternative systems of medicine. The principles that guide Ayurveda and which practitioners use to diagnose and treat misled patients – namely the theory of Vata, Pita and Kapha are part of the obsolete primal pseudoscientific ‘Humoral Theory’ that was philosophical and unscientific. It was buried once scientific discoveries progressed, germ theory evolved and the study of anatomy and physiology came into being. Essentially, this theory stated that the human body was filled with three basic substances, called three humors, which are in balance when a person is healthy. All diseases and disabilities resulted from an excess or deficit of one of these four humors – namely Vata, Pita, Kapha. Can you see how stupid that sounds now? Now the video tells us that based on the “humoral disposition” there are ways to safely consume alcohol – for example, after a hot bath and after taking sweets, alcohol damage is reduced in Pita-type people. This sounds even worse than the worst nonsense you would have ever heard. There is no safe level of alcohol and no healthy or safe way of drinking it. The human body wants to remove alcohol, a known social poison, quickly and effectively, when consumed. The body has no use for alcohol. It has no nutritive value and is all empty calories which the body does not want any of it. But here is a young Ayurveda guy, telling us how to do that safely. A slow and presumed safe exercise in “killing one softly.” Whether you consume alcohol based on Vata, Pita or Kapha or not, the harms of it include liver disease, seven types of cancer, alcohol dependence syndromes, psychiatric illnesses and suicides, heart diseases, injuries, and violence and 61 other diseases that reduce life expectancy. Terrifyingly, the incidence of severe alcohol-related liver disease is increasing rapidly, especially among females and individuals of lower socioeconomic status. We fail to implement proven and effective measures to reduce alcohol harm, usually due to lobbying and interference by the alcohol industry and because we have fools like this guy on Instagram, who dabble in pseudoscience like Ayurveda, misleading public at large. We must eliminate alcohol promotion: advertising, marketing, sponsorship and now “content creation,” to protect our fellow humans from falling into this trap. So, if you could, please do me a favor. Go to this link on his Instagram page and report this nonsense video made by this Ayurveda apologist and sympathizer, so that Instagram can remove it and take it back to the stupidest Hell-hole it emanated from. And remember, do not send your children to study Ayush courses in India. You are doing a disservice to them and to this country. The best they get from that is a dummy “Dr.” title in front of their names and the worst, they get to kill public-health.
1:07

When the young generation embrace a pseudoscience like Ayurveda. There is a huge problem in India. You may not realize it, but it is an open secret. Normalizing and glorifying “healthy alcohol consumption” seems to be the biggest social media tool that young content makers are cashing in from an ill-informed public. As a clinical Hepatologist who writes off close to five death summaries of young men aged 25 to 40 years almost every week – young productive men who have died due to alcohol use disorder and liver failure, leaving behind aging parents, creating widows or fatherless children, I sometimes feel like calling it quits. Maybe it is time to leave everyone to fend for themselves, because there is a limit to which me and other physicians can help and hope to bring a change in the people against a tsunami of disinformation that is directly harming the public health. It is like the Hydra. Cut off one disinformation, two others on the same topic comes in. And then we have young men like Shashank Sharma, this Instagram content creator and possibly an Ayurveda practitioner, who has made this video called “How to consume alcohol safely" according to the ancient traditional Indian (nonsense called) Ayurveda. This one video is enough for you to realize that Ayurveda is a pseudoscience that harms. It is a destructive professional choice for women and men studying it, because it reduces intellectual capacity, kills logical thinking, and murders rationality that students acquire in high school. The Government actively promotes it, runs large public-funded colleges to teach it to students who do not get good ranks in medical entrance examinations, but are dying to have the “Dr.” title in front of their names. Even after passing the course, the majority call themselves “doctors” instead of the traditionally given title of “Vaidya.” It is a profession solely built on the foundations of insecurity and inferiority, which is why you see Ayurveda practitioners always attacking medical science and modern medicine in India. They are trained to become blinded to truth, rabid against facts and hurtful towards those who educate the public on the harms of alternative systems of medicine. The principles that guide Ayurveda and which practitioners use to diagnose and treat misled patients – namely the theory of Vata, Pita and Kapha are part of the obsolete primal pseudoscientific ‘Humoral Theory’ that was philosophical and unscientific. It was buried once scientific discoveries progressed, germ theory evolved and the study of anatomy and physiology came into being. Essentially, this theory stated that the human body was filled with three basic substances, called three humors, which are in balance when a person is healthy. All diseases and disabilities resulted from an excess or deficit of one of these four humors – namely Vata, Pita, Kapha. Can you see how stupid that sounds now? Now the video tells us that based on the “humoral disposition” there are ways to safely consume alcohol – for example, after a hot bath and after taking sweets, alcohol damage is reduced in Pita-type people. This sounds even worse than the worst nonsense you would have ever heard. There is no safe level of alcohol and no healthy or safe way of drinking it. The human body wants to remove alcohol, a known social poison, quickly and effectively, when consumed. The body has no use for alcohol. It has no nutritive value and is all empty calories which the body does not want any of it. But here is a young Ayurveda guy, telling us how to do that safely. A slow and presumed safe exercise in “killing one softly.” Whether you consume alcohol based on Vata, Pita or Kapha or not, the harms of it include liver disease, seven types of cancer, alcohol dependence syndromes, psychiatric illnesses and suicides, heart diseases, injuries, and violence and 61 other diseases that reduce life expectancy. Terrifyingly, the incidence of severe alcohol-related liver disease is increasing rapidly, especially among females and individuals of lower socioeconomic status. We fail to implement proven and effective measures to reduce alcohol harm, usually due to lobbying and interference by the alcohol industry and because we have fools like this guy on Instagram, who dabble in pseudoscience like Ayurveda, misleading public at large. We must eliminate alcohol promotion: advertising, marketing, sponsorship and now “content creation,” to protect our fellow humans from falling into this trap. So, if you could, please do me a favor. Go to this link on his Instagram page and report this nonsense video made by this Ayurveda apologist and sympathizer, so that Instagram can remove it and take it back to the stupidest Hell-hole it emanated from. And remember, do not send your children to study Ayush courses in India. You are doing a disservice to them and to this country. The best they get from that is a dummy “Dr.” title in front of their names and the worst, they get to kill public-health.

TheLiverDoc™

255,802 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren

BALOCHISTAN WAS A COUNTRY, IS A COUNTRY AND WILL REMAIN AN INDEPENDENT COUNTRY..!!! Even the educated voices of Pakistan's Punjab province now confess a bitter truth Pakistanis know almost nothing about the Baloch people, history, culture, language, nor do they ever try to understand them. And that, right there, is the line that separates Balochistan from Pakistan. The people of Balochistan are a nation of deep culture, dignity, and grace. A Harvard University linguistics professor once said that Quetta is among the most enlightened cities in the world. The average Baloch speaks at least three languages, sometimes even seven. Yet Pakistan only knows what lies beneath Balochistan its minerals not the people who live upon it, not their hearts, not their history. But it is too late now, far too late for the occupiers. Balochistan was never Pakistan, is not Pakistan, and will never be Pakistan. The occupying army of Pakistan has left itself no path to redemption; its hands are stained with the crimes of war and the blood of the innocent. Today, every Baloch stands as both the heir and the ambassador of Balochistan. And to all those who took part in the genocide of the Baloch people — know this: neither God will forgive you, nor will the Baloch nation.
1:54

BALOCHISTAN WAS A COUNTRY, IS A COUNTRY AND WILL REMAIN AN INDEPENDENT COUNTRY..!!! Even the educated voices of Pakistan's Punjab province now confess a bitter truth Pakistanis know almost nothing about the Baloch people, history, culture, language, nor do they ever try to understand them. And that, right there, is the line that separates Balochistan from Pakistan. The people of Balochistan are a nation of deep culture, dignity, and grace. A Harvard University linguistics professor once said that Quetta is among the most enlightened cities in the world. The average Baloch speaks at least three languages, sometimes even seven. Yet Pakistan only knows what lies beneath Balochistan its minerals not the people who live upon it, not their hearts, not their history. But it is too late now, far too late for the occupiers. Balochistan was never Pakistan, is not Pakistan, and will never be Pakistan. The occupying army of Pakistan has left itself no path to redemption; its hands are stained with the crimes of war and the blood of the innocent. Today, every Baloch stands as both the heir and the ambassador of Balochistan. And to all those who took part in the genocide of the Baloch people — know this: neither God will forgive you, nor will the Baloch nation.

Mir Yar Baloch

73,896 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Larry Fink just told you what he is building. Fink: “All investments on a tokenized platform… We have one common blockchain.” Not some investments. All of them. Every stock. Every bond. Every acre of land. Every barrel of oil. On one ledger. Controlled by whoever writes the rules of that ledger. That is not a financial product. That is a $300 trillion architecture with one set of keys. Tucker Carlson: “It’s not about their nukes?” Catherine Austin Fitts: “No. Iran Central Bank counts. If you’re gonna come out with programmable money, with digital IDs that are interoperable globally… you can’t afford leakage. Iran right now is the big leakage.” The conflict with Iran is not about weapons. It is not about ideology. It is about one central bank that has not plugged into the system. A nation becomes a threat the moment it refuses to connect. Not a military threat. A structural one. Because one country operating outside programmable money is proof that the exit works. That proof cannot exist. So it gets removed. Now understand what programmable money actually means. Physical cash has no conditions. You hold it. You spend it. No one reaches inside your wallet and switches the bills off. Programmable money is different in one specific way. It can be turned off. Not stolen. Not seized. Not taxed through courts. Switched off. Your balance stays the same. The number does not change. It just stops working. For you. At the time and place of someone else’s choosing. Fitts is not theorizing about a future system. She is describing the architecture being built right now. When your money is programmable, your behavior becomes a variable in someone else’s equation. Your political donations. Your travel. Your purchases. All of it readable. All of it actionable. Not by law. By code. Laws require courts. Courts require time. Code requires nothing. One flag. You can no longer transact. No judge. No jury. No appeal. No sound. Fink is not hiding this. Fitts is not speculating. They are describing the destination. The people who hold physical assets. Who diversify across jurisdictions. Who refuse to convert everything into a token on someone else’s ledger. They are not paranoid. They are already outside the cage. When $300 trillion moves onto one blockchain, under one set of rules, written by the people who control that chain, the word for that is not innovation. The word for that is capture. The door does not slam shut. It locks.
0:41

Larry Fink just told you what he is building. Fink: “All investments on a tokenized platform… We have one common blockchain.” Not some investments. All of them. Every stock. Every bond. Every acre of land. Every barrel of oil. On one ledger. Controlled by whoever writes the rules of that ledger. That is not a financial product. That is a $300 trillion architecture with one set of keys. Tucker Carlson: “It’s not about their nukes?” Catherine Austin Fitts: “No. Iran Central Bank counts. If you’re gonna come out with programmable money, with digital IDs that are interoperable globally… you can’t afford leakage. Iran right now is the big leakage.” The conflict with Iran is not about weapons. It is not about ideology. It is about one central bank that has not plugged into the system. A nation becomes a threat the moment it refuses to connect. Not a military threat. A structural one. Because one country operating outside programmable money is proof that the exit works. That proof cannot exist. So it gets removed. Now understand what programmable money actually means. Physical cash has no conditions. You hold it. You spend it. No one reaches inside your wallet and switches the bills off. Programmable money is different in one specific way. It can be turned off. Not stolen. Not seized. Not taxed through courts. Switched off. Your balance stays the same. The number does not change. It just stops working. For you. At the time and place of someone else’s choosing. Fitts is not theorizing about a future system. She is describing the architecture being built right now. When your money is programmable, your behavior becomes a variable in someone else’s equation. Your political donations. Your travel. Your purchases. All of it readable. All of it actionable. Not by law. By code. Laws require courts. Courts require time. Code requires nothing. One flag. You can no longer transact. No judge. No jury. No appeal. No sound. Fink is not hiding this. Fitts is not speculating. They are describing the destination. The people who hold physical assets. Who diversify across jurisdictions. Who refuse to convert everything into a token on someone else’s ledger. They are not paranoid. They are already outside the cage. When $300 trillion moves onto one blockchain, under one set of rules, written by the people who control that chain, the word for that is not innovation. The word for that is capture. The door does not slam shut. It locks.

Dustin

45,375 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Imagine this for a second. Everywhere you go, everything you do there’s a digital version of you quietly following along. Not just your name or your date of birth, but your habits, your movements, what you buy, where you travel, even who you spend time with. Now, we’re being told it’s a good idea to bundle all of that into a single digital ID. Sounds convenient, right? But convenience has a cost and it’s usually paid in control. Think of a digital ID like putting all your keys your house key, your car key, your office key onto one single keycard. Lose it, and you’re locked out of everything. But worse than losing it is someone else getting hold of it. One breach, one hack, one system failure… and suddenly your entire identity isn’t just expose it’s vulnerable. Now imagine that system isn’t just used to prove who you are, but also to decide what you can do. Maybe it starts small. You need it to access services, to travel, to work. Fair enough. But over time, it can quietly become a gatekeeper. If something goes wrong an error, a disagreement, even a false flag you could find yourself locked out of basic parts of life, with no easy way to fix it. And here’s the thing people don’t always realise: once a system like that is built, it doesn’t stay limited. It expands. New features get added. New rules come in. What starts as “optional” can quickly become unavoidable. It’s not about being paranoid it’s about understanding human systems. Power tends to grow, not shrink. In everyday terms, scrapping digital ID isn’t about rejecting technology. It’s about keeping balance. It’s about making sure no single system has too much control over who you are and what you’re allowed to do. Because your identity isn’t just data. It’s yours. And once you hand over the keys completely, it’s very hard to get them back. Richie Taylor Scrap Digital ID Sat 25 April 2pm The Senedd Cardiff And London Belfast Edinburgh #notodigitalid #together
1:59

Imagine this for a second. Everywhere you go, everything you do there’s a digital version of you quietly following along. Not just your name or your date of birth, but your habits, your movements, what you buy, where you travel, even who you spend time with. Now, we’re being told it’s a good idea to bundle all of that into a single digital ID. Sounds convenient, right? But convenience has a cost and it’s usually paid in control. Think of a digital ID like putting all your keys your house key, your car key, your office key onto one single keycard. Lose it, and you’re locked out of everything. But worse than losing it is someone else getting hold of it. One breach, one hack, one system failure… and suddenly your entire identity isn’t just expose it’s vulnerable. Now imagine that system isn’t just used to prove who you are, but also to decide what you can do. Maybe it starts small. You need it to access services, to travel, to work. Fair enough. But over time, it can quietly become a gatekeeper. If something goes wrong an error, a disagreement, even a false flag you could find yourself locked out of basic parts of life, with no easy way to fix it. And here’s the thing people don’t always realise: once a system like that is built, it doesn’t stay limited. It expands. New features get added. New rules come in. What starts as “optional” can quickly become unavoidable. It’s not about being paranoid it’s about understanding human systems. Power tends to grow, not shrink. In everyday terms, scrapping digital ID isn’t about rejecting technology. It’s about keeping balance. It’s about making sure no single system has too much control over who you are and what you’re allowed to do. Because your identity isn’t just data. It’s yours. And once you hand over the keys completely, it’s very hard to get them back. Richie Taylor Scrap Digital ID Sat 25 April 2pm The Senedd Cardiff And London Belfast Edinburgh #notodigitalid #together

Alan D Miller

16,198 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Turning dried chili peppers into a chili that packs a punch! 🌶️ Ingredients: For the Chili Base Dried chili peppers (Guajillo, Pasilla, or Puya); about 20 peppers Water (for simmering peppers) Meat & Vegetables 1 lb ground beef (80/20) 2 lbs cube steak, diced into small cubes 1 medium yellow onion, diced Flavor Builders 2 Tbsp Dan-O’s Tac-O Seasoning 1 Tbsp Cumin 12oz can Dr. Pepper 1 can pinto beans (optional) 1 heaping scoop beef base (or beef bouillon) Directions: 1. Rehydrate the Chili Peppers Add dried chili peppers to a pot of water Simmer (not boil) for 30 minutes until soft and hydrated Remove peppers and let cool slightly in a bowl Allow excess water to drip off 2. Remove Seeds & Bitter Skins Using a paring knife, slice each pepper open Dip in a small bowl of water to remove seeds easily Lay pepper flat on a cutting board Press with your fingers to scrape out the soft chili pulp Discard the tough outer skin (it’s bitter) Keep only the pulp ( that’s the real chili flavor) 3. Chop the Chili Pulp Finely chop the collected chili pulp Set aside as this becomes your fresh chili paste base 4. Brown the Meat Add ground beef and diced cube steak to a pot Cook over medium-high heat Chop and break up meat until browned and crumbly 5. Add Onion Stir in diced yellow onion 6. Build the Chili Flavor Add chopped chili pulp to the pot Pour in Dr Pepper and add the beef base or bouillon Add the one can pinto beans Stir well and let flavors combine 7. Simmer Lower heat and simmer 45–60 minutes, stirring occasionally 8. Serve Ladle into bowls and top with favorites like cheddar, sour cream, or diced onion. Yum Yum Get Ya Sum!
6:01

Turning dried chili peppers into a chili that packs a punch! 🌶️ Ingredients: For the Chili Base Dried chili peppers (Guajillo, Pasilla, or Puya); about 20 peppers Water (for simmering peppers) Meat & Vegetables 1 lb ground beef (80/20) 2 lbs cube steak, diced into small cubes 1 medium yellow onion, diced Flavor Builders 2 Tbsp Dan-O’s Tac-O Seasoning 1 Tbsp Cumin 12oz can Dr. Pepper 1 can pinto beans (optional) 1 heaping scoop beef base (or beef bouillon) Directions: 1. Rehydrate the Chili Peppers Add dried chili peppers to a pot of water Simmer (not boil) for 30 minutes until soft and hydrated Remove peppers and let cool slightly in a bowl Allow excess water to drip off 2. Remove Seeds & Bitter Skins Using a paring knife, slice each pepper open Dip in a small bowl of water to remove seeds easily Lay pepper flat on a cutting board Press with your fingers to scrape out the soft chili pulp Discard the tough outer skin (it’s bitter) Keep only the pulp ( that’s the real chili flavor) 3. Chop the Chili Pulp Finely chop the collected chili pulp Set aside as this becomes your fresh chili paste base 4. Brown the Meat Add ground beef and diced cube steak to a pot Cook over medium-high heat Chop and break up meat until browned and crumbly 5. Add Onion Stir in diced yellow onion 6. Build the Chili Flavor Add chopped chili pulp to the pot Pour in Dr Pepper and add the beef base or bouillon Add the one can pinto beans Stir well and let flavors combine 7. Simmer Lower heat and simmer 45–60 minutes, stirring occasionally 8. Serve Ladle into bowls and top with favorites like cheddar, sour cream, or diced onion. Yum Yum Get Ya Sum!

Dan-O’s Seasoning

16,147 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

This man will be celebrating Father’s Day at the cemetery with his son who served our country. He has a message for people on Flag Day and for the people behind ‘No Kings’ protests. “There’s a billionaire out there who is offering people a little bit of money for people to bring havoc to the cities through the United States. He’s planting bricks throughout the cities for people to throw at cops, throw at Marines and The National Guard. Please do not buy into his hatred. He’s a bitter, old, miserable man and sooner or later he’s gonna’ get caught funding all of this hate. Out of respect for all these young men and women behind me, please do not attend. RESPECT!” Amen Mr. Buckley. We thank your son Lance Corporal Gregory Buckley for his service to our country. It’s a debt we can never repay. Mr. Buckley is talking about that old miserable George Soros in my opinion. He should be deemed an Enemy Of The State. He should have all his assets frozen and he should be arrested. Thank you sir. We are with you. 🇺🇸
1:09

This man will be celebrating Father’s Day at the cemetery with his son who served our country. He has a message for people on Flag Day and for the people behind ‘No Kings’ protests. “There’s a billionaire out there who is offering people a little bit of money for people to bring havoc to the cities through the United States. He’s planting bricks throughout the cities for people to throw at cops, throw at Marines and The National Guard. Please do not buy into his hatred. He’s a bitter, old, miserable man and sooner or later he’s gonna’ get caught funding all of this hate. Out of respect for all these young men and women behind me, please do not attend. RESPECT!” Amen Mr. Buckley. We thank your son Lance Corporal Gregory Buckley for his service to our country. It’s a debt we can never repay. Mr. Buckley is talking about that old miserable George Soros in my opinion. He should be deemed an Enemy Of The State. He should have all his assets frozen and he should be arrested. Thank you sir. We are with you. 🇺🇸

👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈

475,034 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Johann Sebastian Bach’s Brandenburg Concerto No. 3: Beauty Born from the Order of Relationships The most remarkable aspect of Johann Sebastian Bach’s Brandenburg Concerto No. 3 does not lie in the presence of a dominant soloist, but in the fact that no single voice stands alone. From the very first sounds, the listener is drawn into the powerful movement of the string instruments. The three groups of violins, violas, and cellos continuously engage in dialogue, passing ideas between one another and supporting each other. Each musical line has its own character, yet none exists apart from the greater flow. This organization reveals a profound principle of beauty: Beauty does not exist only within individual parts; it emerges when different elements discover a harmonious way to connect with one another. The performance by Voices of Music in the Historically Informed Performance (HIP) style highlights this quality. By presenting each musical line with greater clarity in the spirit of the Baroque tradition, the listener can perceive how Bach allows every instrument to maintain its own voice while participating in a larger structure. No Single Note Creates Beauty on Its Own A single note, no matter how beautiful, cannot create the depth of an entire musical work. The meaning of Bach’s music does not lie in isolated elements, but in the way those elements respond to, complement, and illuminate one another. A single stone does not create the beauty of a building; a single brushstroke cannot represent the full value of a painting. Only when each detail is placed in its proper position within a larger structure does beauty truly emerge. In Brandenburg Concerto No. 3, a violin line does not gain value because it stands above the other voices. It becomes meaningful because of the role it plays within the overall movement of the composition. Independent, Yet Not Separate This is one of the defining qualities of Bach’s contrapuntal art. Each musical line in the work possesses its own character. A musical idea may appear in the violins, be taken up by the violas, and then answered by the cellos. The voices do not simply merge together; they continuously engage in dialogue and develop alongside one another. If all instruments played the same melody, the music would lose its depth. Yet if every line existed completely independently, the work would lose its balance. Bach creates a delicate middle ground: each element preserves its own identity, but none exists as an isolated individual. It is this interaction that enriches every musical voice. No part needs to overpower another in order to become significant; the value of each element is revealed through its contribution to the entire composition. A Structure Always in Motion The vitality of Brandenburg Concerto No. 3 comes from continuous movement, but this movement is never without direction. Each musical phrase opens the way for the next. Every moment of tension prepares for a moment of release. Within the ritornello structure, the main theme returns repeatedly, yet each appearance carries a new character after undergoing processes of development and transformation. Bach does not create beauty through the simple repetition of a fixed idea. Instead, he allows a familiar theme to be rediscovered in different contexts. This is also a characteristic of sustainable systems in nature: they do not exist by remaining unchanged, but by maintaining balance throughout transformation. A healthy living organism is not a state of stillness. It constantly adjusts, adapts, and renews itself while preserving inner stability. If nothing changes, life loses its ability to develop. But if every change occurs without a guiding principle, balance cannot be maintained. Sustainability requires both a stable foundation and the ability to move. This is precisely what Bach achieves in Brandenburg Concerto No. 3. A musical idea does not merely return; it is transformed through interaction with other voices before appearing again. He creates a structure that possesses both order and vitality — a world where change does not destroy balance, but instead enriches it. Why Do We Experience This as Beautiful? When we listen to music, we do not simply receive individual sounds. We naturally search for relationships, hidden patterns, and the ways in which different elements connect. A completely chaotic work would struggle to create a sense of wholeness. Yet a work that only repeats without development would easily become monotonous. The appeal of Bach’s music lies in the balance between predictability and surprise. The listener senses a familiar foundation while simultaneously being led toward new possibilities of development. When every element in a composition appears to have a meaningful purpose, we experience a structure in which complexity has been transformed into harmony. A Principle Beyond Music What Bach expresses is not only a mastery of counterpoint, but also a vision of harmony itself. A powerful whole is not created by eliminating differences between its parts. Instead, those differences create depth when they are placed within the right relationships. In Brandenburg Concerto No. 3, the violins, violas, and cellos do not lose their individual qualities when combined. Through their dialogue, the unique colors of each instrumental group become even more apparent. Beauty therefore does not arise from absolute uniformity, but from the ability to transform many different elements into a unified balance. Conclusion Brandenburg Concerto No. 3 is not merely a masterpiece of the Baroque era. Through the organization of multiple independent melodic lines into a harmonious flow, Bach reveals a profound principle of beauty: Each element reaches its fullest expression when it is placed within the proper relationship to the whole to which it belongs. The power of the work does not lie in a single melody or a single technique, but in the way all its elements coexist, respond, and support one another. More than three centuries later, Brandenburg Concerto No. 3 continues to move listeners because it expresses a fundamental truth: beauty emerges when diversity finds a harmonious form — when each part preserves its own identity while contributing to a whole greater than itself.
11:42

Johann Sebastian Bach’s Brandenburg Concerto No. 3: Beauty Born from the Order of Relationships The most remarkable aspect of Johann Sebastian Bach’s Brandenburg Concerto No. 3 does not lie in the presence of a dominant soloist, but in the fact that no single voice stands alone. From the very first sounds, the listener is drawn into the powerful movement of the string instruments. The three groups of violins, violas, and cellos continuously engage in dialogue, passing ideas between one another and supporting each other. Each musical line has its own character, yet none exists apart from the greater flow. This organization reveals a profound principle of beauty: Beauty does not exist only within individual parts; it emerges when different elements discover a harmonious way to connect with one another. The performance by Voices of Music in the Historically Informed Performance (HIP) style highlights this quality. By presenting each musical line with greater clarity in the spirit of the Baroque tradition, the listener can perceive how Bach allows every instrument to maintain its own voice while participating in a larger structure. No Single Note Creates Beauty on Its Own A single note, no matter how beautiful, cannot create the depth of an entire musical work. The meaning of Bach’s music does not lie in isolated elements, but in the way those elements respond to, complement, and illuminate one another. A single stone does not create the beauty of a building; a single brushstroke cannot represent the full value of a painting. Only when each detail is placed in its proper position within a larger structure does beauty truly emerge. In Brandenburg Concerto No. 3, a violin line does not gain value because it stands above the other voices. It becomes meaningful because of the role it plays within the overall movement of the composition. Independent, Yet Not Separate This is one of the defining qualities of Bach’s contrapuntal art. Each musical line in the work possesses its own character. A musical idea may appear in the violins, be taken up by the violas, and then answered by the cellos. The voices do not simply merge together; they continuously engage in dialogue and develop alongside one another. If all instruments played the same melody, the music would lose its depth. Yet if every line existed completely independently, the work would lose its balance. Bach creates a delicate middle ground: each element preserves its own identity, but none exists as an isolated individual. It is this interaction that enriches every musical voice. No part needs to overpower another in order to become significant; the value of each element is revealed through its contribution to the entire composition. A Structure Always in Motion The vitality of Brandenburg Concerto No. 3 comes from continuous movement, but this movement is never without direction. Each musical phrase opens the way for the next. Every moment of tension prepares for a moment of release. Within the ritornello structure, the main theme returns repeatedly, yet each appearance carries a new character after undergoing processes of development and transformation. Bach does not create beauty through the simple repetition of a fixed idea. Instead, he allows a familiar theme to be rediscovered in different contexts. This is also a characteristic of sustainable systems in nature: they do not exist by remaining unchanged, but by maintaining balance throughout transformation. A healthy living organism is not a state of stillness. It constantly adjusts, adapts, and renews itself while preserving inner stability. If nothing changes, life loses its ability to develop. But if every change occurs without a guiding principle, balance cannot be maintained. Sustainability requires both a stable foundation and the ability to move. This is precisely what Bach achieves in Brandenburg Concerto No. 3. A musical idea does not merely return; it is transformed through interaction with other voices before appearing again. He creates a structure that possesses both order and vitality — a world where change does not destroy balance, but instead enriches it. Why Do We Experience This as Beautiful? When we listen to music, we do not simply receive individual sounds. We naturally search for relationships, hidden patterns, and the ways in which different elements connect. A completely chaotic work would struggle to create a sense of wholeness. Yet a work that only repeats without development would easily become monotonous. The appeal of Bach’s music lies in the balance between predictability and surprise. The listener senses a familiar foundation while simultaneously being led toward new possibilities of development. When every element in a composition appears to have a meaningful purpose, we experience a structure in which complexity has been transformed into harmony. A Principle Beyond Music What Bach expresses is not only a mastery of counterpoint, but also a vision of harmony itself. A powerful whole is not created by eliminating differences between its parts. Instead, those differences create depth when they are placed within the right relationships. In Brandenburg Concerto No. 3, the violins, violas, and cellos do not lose their individual qualities when combined. Through their dialogue, the unique colors of each instrumental group become even more apparent. Beauty therefore does not arise from absolute uniformity, but from the ability to transform many different elements into a unified balance. Conclusion Brandenburg Concerto No. 3 is not merely a masterpiece of the Baroque era. Through the organization of multiple independent melodic lines into a harmonious flow, Bach reveals a profound principle of beauty: Each element reaches its fullest expression when it is placed within the proper relationship to the whole to which it belongs. The power of the work does not lie in a single melody or a single technique, but in the way all its elements coexist, respond, and support one another. More than three centuries later, Brandenburg Concerto No. 3 continues to move listeners because it expresses a fundamental truth: beauty emerges when diversity finds a harmonious form — when each part preserves its own identity while contributing to a whole greater than itself.

🎼🌺Music Love♥️

12,442 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Should you trust alternative medicine practitioners? The answer is a resounding NO. And here is an example. Trivandrum, Kerala-based Ayurveda practitioner Vaidya (not Dr.) Rekha Radhamony misleads her >100K followers on Instagram with an extremely dangerous anti-science narrative. Such narratives sow seeds of mistrust in science-based medicine among patients and general population. It generates chemophobia (that all modern medicines are chemicals), inculcating the false notion that everything "natural and herbal" are safer and primal practices are effective. This helps Ayurveds and such practitioners sell their practices and products to people. AYUSH practititioners deceive themselves first, through a study course that stuns their critical thinking centers and makes them sheeple when it comes to following dogmatic practices on healthcare. They stop questioning. They stop thinking logically. They lose rationality. They become pithed frogs on a tray waiting for controlled animation. Ayurveda/Homeopathy are like a religion. The practitioners become members of a cult. Their only aim is to protect the religious/dogmatic principles and practices of the cult and its members and have zero concerns and are insensitive towards patients and their families. This results in FIVE major issues: 1. Patients get misdiagnosed and disease worsen. 2. Patients receive wrong treatments for correct diagnoses and develop disease-related complications. 3. Patients develop severe complications related to toxicity and adverse events of untested, unregulated alternative medicines. 4. Patients end up spending more for their required timely treatments due to initial mistreatment and falsely believe that modern medicine is expensive. 5. Patients die - terribly - avoidable deaths. Practices such as Ayurveda are deeply flawed - from every perspective you look at it. The practitioners are empty vessels, they make background noise, they cannot diagnose, treat, and do not have a protocol for follow-up and has no knowledge, practice or methods to identify adverse effects within their treatments. Homeopathy is even worse - if a patient develops worsening of disease due to diluted treatments, or a side effect of the treatment, they consider it "Homeopathic aggravation" - where they are taught and believe that eveyrthing good happens after a period of worsening. Even if the patient dies, Homeopaths would not be able to understand that the person is dead, because Homeopathic practice is inherently a brain-dead practice. Practices such as Ayurveda escape the scientific method and shy away from realistic testing and rigorous trials - because they sure-shot fail. When the evidence is lacking, then how can they sell? In this video, "the primal and primitive dogmatism of healthcare" indoctrinated Vaidya Rekha does exactly that. She confirms that Ayurvedic practice is garbage-worthy & cowardly and sticks to 5000 year old nauseating and utterly nonsense principles that refuse change and runs away from scrutiny. Following such practices is extremely harmful and this WILL lead to avoidable loss of life. The biggest strength of science-based medicine and medical science is that it is humble in its principles. Every new and effective finding is embraced and old findings are discarded. Every wrong is made right, in due course. Every wrong is identified - there is a strong machinery in place. Every doctor will appreciate the flaws and change for the better. It is nowhere like the stupid alternative medicine which is adamant and anti-human and anti-health. Scientific medicine does not fear change, does not fear acceptance of mistakes and does not invest and emote with the past. Everything is futuritic and everything is for the people. Make NO mistake. Ayush practices are cultish, and for the deceptive livelihood of the person practicing. Scientific practices are humanistic, and not for a person, but for the people.
0:41

Should you trust alternative medicine practitioners? The answer is a resounding NO. And here is an example. Trivandrum, Kerala-based Ayurveda practitioner Vaidya (not Dr.) Rekha Radhamony misleads her >100K followers on Instagram with an extremely dangerous anti-science narrative. Such narratives sow seeds of mistrust in science-based medicine among patients and general population. It generates chemophobia (that all modern medicines are chemicals), inculcating the false notion that everything "natural and herbal" are safer and primal practices are effective. This helps Ayurveds and such practitioners sell their practices and products to people. AYUSH practititioners deceive themselves first, through a study course that stuns their critical thinking centers and makes them sheeple when it comes to following dogmatic practices on healthcare. They stop questioning. They stop thinking logically. They lose rationality. They become pithed frogs on a tray waiting for controlled animation. Ayurveda/Homeopathy are like a religion. The practitioners become members of a cult. Their only aim is to protect the religious/dogmatic principles and practices of the cult and its members and have zero concerns and are insensitive towards patients and their families. This results in FIVE major issues: 1. Patients get misdiagnosed and disease worsen. 2. Patients receive wrong treatments for correct diagnoses and develop disease-related complications. 3. Patients develop severe complications related to toxicity and adverse events of untested, unregulated alternative medicines. 4. Patients end up spending more for their required timely treatments due to initial mistreatment and falsely believe that modern medicine is expensive. 5. Patients die - terribly - avoidable deaths. Practices such as Ayurveda are deeply flawed - from every perspective you look at it. The practitioners are empty vessels, they make background noise, they cannot diagnose, treat, and do not have a protocol for follow-up and has no knowledge, practice or methods to identify adverse effects within their treatments. Homeopathy is even worse - if a patient develops worsening of disease due to diluted treatments, or a side effect of the treatment, they consider it "Homeopathic aggravation" - where they are taught and believe that eveyrthing good happens after a period of worsening. Even if the patient dies, Homeopaths would not be able to understand that the person is dead, because Homeopathic practice is inherently a brain-dead practice. Practices such as Ayurveda escape the scientific method and shy away from realistic testing and rigorous trials - because they sure-shot fail. When the evidence is lacking, then how can they sell? In this video, "the primal and primitive dogmatism of healthcare" indoctrinated Vaidya Rekha does exactly that. She confirms that Ayurvedic practice is garbage-worthy & cowardly and sticks to 5000 year old nauseating and utterly nonsense principles that refuse change and runs away from scrutiny. Following such practices is extremely harmful and this WILL lead to avoidable loss of life. The biggest strength of science-based medicine and medical science is that it is humble in its principles. Every new and effective finding is embraced and old findings are discarded. Every wrong is made right, in due course. Every wrong is identified - there is a strong machinery in place. Every doctor will appreciate the flaws and change for the better. It is nowhere like the stupid alternative medicine which is adamant and anti-human and anti-health. Scientific medicine does not fear change, does not fear acceptance of mistakes and does not invest and emote with the past. Everything is futuritic and everything is for the people. Make NO mistake. Ayush practices are cultish, and for the deceptive livelihood of the person practicing. Scientific practices are humanistic, and not for a person, but for the people.

TheLiverDoc™

152,400 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren

Another defamation case in the works? Ok. Will not apologize. Will not delete. But will apologise and delete if: 1) Institution of national repute will put out a public statement that they will ensure all patients - from all wakes of life will be treated with evidence-based scientific medicine without prejudice and not Ayurvedic quackery. If the patient wants Ayurvedic quackery then the doctors must counsel them on cons of the treatment because there are no pros. The final decision can be with the patient after a wholesome discussion. 2) Call back this patient with bipolar (see last video l) who received toxic ayurvedic products as part of bipolar mania treatment and provide actual guidelines based medical care. 3) Ayurveda practitioners who prescribed the set of herbals to the bipolar patient must show evidence for their treatment from classical as well as modern medical literature, mechanism of action, dosing studies, safety profile of each herbal and multi herbal combinations in this group of patients. The amount of abuses and harassment that alumni of NIMHANS showered on my Instagram was quite a lot. They were all worried about the "name" of their institute getting tarnished...NOT A SINGLE DOCTOR from NIMHANS reached out or responded asking how the patient was or about the atrocity committed against the patient. Not one. Patients do not go to NIMHANS for Ayurvedic treatment. If real doctors don't stand up for their patients, then who will? I know doctors who work in NIMHANS and such government run institutes are held hostage and scared. But I am not, because I am only concerned about patients and their family. And their right to healthcare. I vehemently stand against integrative quackery. And every doctor should too, if they have an iota of conscience and humanism left for their patients, past-present-and future.
7:15

Another defamation case in the works? Ok. Will not apologize. Will not delete. But will apologise and delete if: 1) Institution of national repute will put out a public statement that they will ensure all patients - from all wakes of life will be treated with evidence-based scientific medicine without prejudice and not Ayurvedic quackery. If the patient wants Ayurvedic quackery then the doctors must counsel them on cons of the treatment because there are no pros. The final decision can be with the patient after a wholesome discussion. 2) Call back this patient with bipolar (see last video l) who received toxic ayurvedic products as part of bipolar mania treatment and provide actual guidelines based medical care. 3) Ayurveda practitioners who prescribed the set of herbals to the bipolar patient must show evidence for their treatment from classical as well as modern medical literature, mechanism of action, dosing studies, safety profile of each herbal and multi herbal combinations in this group of patients. The amount of abuses and harassment that alumni of NIMHANS showered on my Instagram was quite a lot. They were all worried about the "name" of their institute getting tarnished...NOT A SINGLE DOCTOR from NIMHANS reached out or responded asking how the patient was or about the atrocity committed against the patient. Not one. Patients do not go to NIMHANS for Ayurvedic treatment. If real doctors don't stand up for their patients, then who will? I know doctors who work in NIMHANS and such government run institutes are held hostage and scared. But I am not, because I am only concerned about patients and their family. And their right to healthcare. I vehemently stand against integrative quackery. And every doctor should too, if they have an iota of conscience and humanism left for their patients, past-present-and future.

TheLiverDoc™

42,797 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🚨 “I Don’t Recognize Our Country Anymore” – Douglas Murray’s Furious Rant on Britain’s Surrender to Jihad Marches and Two-Tier Policing 🔥 Douglas Murray is furious at what Britain has become: a country that no longer feels like its own, where Islamist extremists are allowed to parade through London every weekend calling for jihad, praising Hamas terrorists, and openly inciting violence against Jews, all while authorities turn a blind eye. He’s outraged by the shocking double standards and the decades of weakness that enabled this cultural surrender. “I don’t recognize our country anymore. I don’t understand why we have given in to Islamists who parade in London, calling for jihad and praising Hamas, praising terrorists. They hate Britain just as much as they hate Israel.” “Why is it that if you call for violence against Jews day after day on the streets of London, that’s A-OK with the Metropolitan Police? But if Jews want to congregate in central London, apparently it’s not OK?” This betrayal isn’t accidental. “It’s come about because of a generational cowardice by politicians of all parties and by the Metropolitan Police and others.” Britain has conceded far too much to those who despise its values and its people. How much longer? Enough is enough.
2:19

🚨 “I Don’t Recognize Our Country Anymore” – Douglas Murray’s Furious Rant on Britain’s Surrender to Jihad Marches and Two-Tier Policing 🔥 Douglas Murray is furious at what Britain has become: a country that no longer feels like its own, where Islamist extremists are allowed to parade through London every weekend calling for jihad, praising Hamas terrorists, and openly inciting violence against Jews, all while authorities turn a blind eye. He’s outraged by the shocking double standards and the decades of weakness that enabled this cultural surrender. “I don’t recognize our country anymore. I don’t understand why we have given in to Islamists who parade in London, calling for jihad and praising Hamas, praising terrorists. They hate Britain just as much as they hate Israel.” “Why is it that if you call for violence against Jews day after day on the streets of London, that’s A-OK with the Metropolitan Police? But if Jews want to congregate in central London, apparently it’s not OK?” This betrayal isn’t accidental. “It’s come about because of a generational cowardice by politicians of all parties and by the Metropolitan Police and others.” Britain has conceded far too much to those who despise its values and its people. How much longer? Enough is enough.

Skint Eastwood

57,125 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Mamdani: Each time the president and I speak is about the same topics: how to improve the lives of New Yorkers and how to use the power of government to take on the cost of living crisis, to grow our economy, and to build a better, stronger New York. Each day, millions of New Yorkers struggle to get by in a city where a decent life costs too much, where a future of possibility and prosperity feels forever just one paycheck out of reach, where dignity is not accorded to all, but only afforded by some.I have said time and again that I will work with anyone, no matter what party they belong to, no matter how much they may disagree on other topics. Whoever has the power and the will to lift that weight off New Yorkers' backs, at a time where hundreds of thousands of New Yorkers are asking the questions of how they can afford this city. I appreciate the conversation that the president and I have had on the subject of how we can make it easier to afford life in this great city that we call our home.
1:03

Mamdani: Each time the president and I speak is about the same topics: how to improve the lives of New Yorkers and how to use the power of government to take on the cost of living crisis, to grow our economy, and to build a better, stronger New York. Each day, millions of New Yorkers struggle to get by in a city where a decent life costs too much, where a future of possibility and prosperity feels forever just one paycheck out of reach, where dignity is not accorded to all, but only afforded by some.I have said time and again that I will work with anyone, no matter what party they belong to, no matter how much they may disagree on other topics. Whoever has the power and the will to lift that weight off New Yorkers' backs, at a time where hundreds of thousands of New Yorkers are asking the questions of how they can afford this city. I appreciate the conversation that the president and I have had on the subject of how we can make it easier to afford life in this great city that we call our home.

Acyn

117,527 Aufrufe • vor 5 Tagen

MATTE TINT WITH TAYTAWAN #barenblissxTay #TayNew #เตนิว 🫍 I don't know what I do during sleep but I believe New who has been sleeping with me all my life— I mean, over 10 years we know each other, we never had such a problem. 🫍 Our only problem which be both do is, snoring. The problem when I sleep with New is, he sleeps fast. New is someone who sleeps really fast, he can sleep in less than 20 minutes. So whenever we sleep together, I always go to the bed first because I need 8 hours sleep, and I still can't sleep at all. While at the same time, New will be on his phone playing it all the time, and the moment he wanna sleep, he can just fall asleep easily in few seconds. So, whenever we went through a tiring trip, he'll snores. I'll tell him in the next day but he won't believe it. Since I always sleep the last almost every night, so the next day I recorded him and he was bitter. Until one day, he was maybe waking up to pee, and he taking revenge by recording me snoring too. Well, cause I was tired, we won't know whether we'll be snoring or not, right? So we just close this case and never talk about this anymore ever since. But we're already get used with each other sleeping habit, no problem at all. 🎤 Because you've been sleeping with each other the whole life, right? 🫍 No, no. Over 10 years.
1:33

MATTE TINT WITH TAYTAWAN #barenblissxTay #TayNew #เตนิว 🫍 I don't know what I do during sleep but I believe New who has been sleeping with me all my life— I mean, over 10 years we know each other, we never had such a problem. 🫍 Our only problem which be both do is, snoring. The problem when I sleep with New is, he sleeps fast. New is someone who sleeps really fast, he can sleep in less than 20 minutes. So whenever we sleep together, I always go to the bed first because I need 8 hours sleep, and I still can't sleep at all. While at the same time, New will be on his phone playing it all the time, and the moment he wanna sleep, he can just fall asleep easily in few seconds. So, whenever we went through a tiring trip, he'll snores. I'll tell him in the next day but he won't believe it. Since I always sleep the last almost every night, so the next day I recorded him and he was bitter. Until one day, he was maybe waking up to pee, and he taking revenge by recording me snoring too. Well, cause I was tired, we won't know whether we'll be snoring or not, right? So we just close this case and never talk about this anymore ever since. But we're already get used with each other sleeping habit, no problem at all. 🎤 Because you've been sleeping with each other the whole life, right? 🫍 No, no. Over 10 years.

deeコ

27,943 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

And so a day later i feel its time for an evening reflection. Ive sold about 480 pieces. And honestly i am very grateful. Each of the people who minted one shows they believe in this space beyond its current status. In any case. This is a massive artistic success. I managed to sell for nearly 50 eth worth of art. Be supported by people who showed up. Its honestly unbelievable. I know last nigt i sounded differently. But, keep in mind that i spend the last 4 years aka every single day, grinding away at the results. I spend all my money, and i mean, the cost of this year exceeds what ive currently made. And thats 2025. All my time. I was working while my step father got a stroke. Had to move out of my childhood home,I was working while my grandmother died. My grandfather died. I was working the days right before my beloved Dottje passed away. I didnt do anything else but work. To the detriment of my relationships. And sometimes the frustration of those around me. But it was worth it to me. Because the vision i had. It is now here. Its out. Its alive. Its appreciated by you guys. And therefore Each one of you matters. You edged your own legacy in the stars But if we look at what the space values. What it cares about. I think it goes beyond what I have offered. To make it you need to play the game. This game is not an easy one. Its one of connections. Big money. Unbelievable promises And beyond that. A world I personally do not resonate with. This space glorifies a lifestyle that for me has very little to do with why i joined. It glorifies people that have very little do with why i joined. And its glorifying behaviour once again, very little to do why i joined. But honestly, i dont care. Because I joined because this space is the only place where art like mine has a place. The only place art like mine can evolve and rally a group of people. The only place you read this far into my ramble 😂💀 I hope my art can stand as a refuge in a storm that goes beyond the current truths of this space. And I think we are truly only at the beginning of a journey that we barely know has started. Keep it breezy. Gn
0:21

And so a day later i feel its time for an evening reflection. Ive sold about 480 pieces. And honestly i am very grateful. Each of the people who minted one shows they believe in this space beyond its current status. In any case. This is a massive artistic success. I managed to sell for nearly 50 eth worth of art. Be supported by people who showed up. Its honestly unbelievable. I know last nigt i sounded differently. But, keep in mind that i spend the last 4 years aka every single day, grinding away at the results. I spend all my money, and i mean, the cost of this year exceeds what ive currently made. And thats 2025. All my time. I was working while my step father got a stroke. Had to move out of my childhood home,I was working while my grandmother died. My grandfather died. I was working the days right before my beloved Dottje passed away. I didnt do anything else but work. To the detriment of my relationships. And sometimes the frustration of those around me. But it was worth it to me. Because the vision i had. It is now here. Its out. Its alive. Its appreciated by you guys. And therefore Each one of you matters. You edged your own legacy in the stars But if we look at what the space values. What it cares about. I think it goes beyond what I have offered. To make it you need to play the game. This game is not an easy one. Its one of connections. Big money. Unbelievable promises And beyond that. A world I personally do not resonate with. This space glorifies a lifestyle that for me has very little to do with why i joined. It glorifies people that have very little do with why i joined. And its glorifying behaviour once again, very little to do why i joined. But honestly, i dont care. Because I joined because this space is the only place where art like mine has a place. The only place art like mine can evolve and rally a group of people. The only place you read this far into my ramble 😂💀 I hope my art can stand as a refuge in a storm that goes beyond the current truths of this space. And I think we are truly only at the beginning of a journey that we barely know has started. Keep it breezy. Gn

Dutchtide.eth

22,702 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Many remember Vito Corleone's final conversation with Michael as the moment a father passes his empire to his son. But if that had truly been Francis Ford Coppola's central point, the scene would never have taken place in a garden. He would have set it in the office. That is where power is built. It is also where power is transferred. Instead, Coppola does the opposite. He removes Vito from every symbol that has defined him throughout the film. The dark office is gone. The desk where life-and-death decisions were made is gone. The men waiting for his orders are gone. Even Don Corleone's black suit is gone. What remains is an elderly man in a simple cardigan, sitting among trees, speaking with his son in the soft light of late afternoon. At first glance, it seems like nothing more than a change of location. In cinematic terms, however, it is the most important choice in the entire sequence. For nearly three hours, Coppola carefully builds Vito through the language of power. In this scene, he deliberately strips those layers away. Not to make the character appear weaker. But to stop us from seeing Don Corleone—and allow us to see Vito. Just as importantly, Michael is never framed as a subordinate receiving instructions. The two men sit at eye level. The camera refuses to establish dominance. There is no composition of command and obedience. Because this is not staged as a transfer of authority. It is staged as a meeting. One man has almost reached the end of his journey. The other is about to begin its most difficult chapter. What Vito offers is not a collection of strategies for victory. Strategy belongs to its own time and circumstance. What he passes on is something deeper—a sense of direction that can endure even when circumstances inevitably change. That is why the rhythm of the scene becomes remarkably quiet. There is no conflict. No dramatic climax. No speech designed to astonish the audience. Coppola lets everything settle. Because some truths can only be heard after the noise has faded. That is also why he chooses the garden. Throughout The Godfather, it is the place closest to nature. A garden is where human beings care for life, but never create it. A gardener cannot force a seed to grow. He can only cultivate the conditions in which the life already within the seed may flourish. In a deeper sense, Vito is doing the same. He cannot live Michael's life for him. He cannot make the choices Michael will one day face. The only thing he can do is preserve what time has already proven to be enduring, and entrust it to the next generation. This is no longer instruction. It is continuity. Perhaps that is why Coppola refuses to place the conversation inside a room. He places it among trees. Because nature has always followed a simple law. A tree does not keep its fruit for itself. The fruit bears seeds. The seeds become new trees. Life does not continue through possession. Life continues through what is given away. And it is here that Coppola completes Vito Corleone's journey. For most of the film, Vito is a Don. He commands. He judges. He protects his family. He carries an entire order upon his shoulders. But in the garden, every one of those roles quietly falls away. What remains is not a crime boss. It is a man. A man no longer concerned with how much power he can hold. Only with what is worthy of living on after he is gone. Perhaps that is why this sequence leaves such a lasting impression. It does not ask us to admire Vito Corleone. It invites us to examine ourselves. One day our work will end. Our status will end. Our reputation will end. Even the roles life has entrusted to us will come to an end. When that day arrives, what will remain? Francis Ford Coppola never answers that question with dialogue. He answers it with images. He quietly removes a man from every symbol of power, returns him to the natural world, and lets life speak for itself. Perhaps that is why, more than half a century later, the garden scene still leaves audiences in silence. Not because it is about a Mafia family. But because it reminds us of something every human heart instinctively recognizes. A life is not ultimately measured by what we keep for ourselves, but by what is most true within us that continues to live on in the lives of others. Name movie: The Godfather (1972)
2:19

Many remember Vito Corleone's final conversation with Michael as the moment a father passes his empire to his son. But if that had truly been Francis Ford Coppola's central point, the scene would never have taken place in a garden. He would have set it in the office. That is where power is built. It is also where power is transferred. Instead, Coppola does the opposite. He removes Vito from every symbol that has defined him throughout the film. The dark office is gone. The desk where life-and-death decisions were made is gone. The men waiting for his orders are gone. Even Don Corleone's black suit is gone. What remains is an elderly man in a simple cardigan, sitting among trees, speaking with his son in the soft light of late afternoon. At first glance, it seems like nothing more than a change of location. In cinematic terms, however, it is the most important choice in the entire sequence. For nearly three hours, Coppola carefully builds Vito through the language of power. In this scene, he deliberately strips those layers away. Not to make the character appear weaker. But to stop us from seeing Don Corleone—and allow us to see Vito. Just as importantly, Michael is never framed as a subordinate receiving instructions. The two men sit at eye level. The camera refuses to establish dominance. There is no composition of command and obedience. Because this is not staged as a transfer of authority. It is staged as a meeting. One man has almost reached the end of his journey. The other is about to begin its most difficult chapter. What Vito offers is not a collection of strategies for victory. Strategy belongs to its own time and circumstance. What he passes on is something deeper—a sense of direction that can endure even when circumstances inevitably change. That is why the rhythm of the scene becomes remarkably quiet. There is no conflict. No dramatic climax. No speech designed to astonish the audience. Coppola lets everything settle. Because some truths can only be heard after the noise has faded. That is also why he chooses the garden. Throughout The Godfather, it is the place closest to nature. A garden is where human beings care for life, but never create it. A gardener cannot force a seed to grow. He can only cultivate the conditions in which the life already within the seed may flourish. In a deeper sense, Vito is doing the same. He cannot live Michael's life for him. He cannot make the choices Michael will one day face. The only thing he can do is preserve what time has already proven to be enduring, and entrust it to the next generation. This is no longer instruction. It is continuity. Perhaps that is why Coppola refuses to place the conversation inside a room. He places it among trees. Because nature has always followed a simple law. A tree does not keep its fruit for itself. The fruit bears seeds. The seeds become new trees. Life does not continue through possession. Life continues through what is given away. And it is here that Coppola completes Vito Corleone's journey. For most of the film, Vito is a Don. He commands. He judges. He protects his family. He carries an entire order upon his shoulders. But in the garden, every one of those roles quietly falls away. What remains is not a crime boss. It is a man. A man no longer concerned with how much power he can hold. Only with what is worthy of living on after he is gone. Perhaps that is why this sequence leaves such a lasting impression. It does not ask us to admire Vito Corleone. It invites us to examine ourselves. One day our work will end. Our status will end. Our reputation will end. Even the roles life has entrusted to us will come to an end. When that day arrives, what will remain? Francis Ford Coppola never answers that question with dialogue. He answers it with images. He quietly removes a man from every symbol of power, returns him to the natural world, and lets life speak for itself. Perhaps that is why, more than half a century later, the garden scene still leaves audiences in silence. Not because it is about a Mafia family. But because it reminds us of something every human heart instinctively recognizes. A life is not ultimately measured by what we keep for ourselves, but by what is most true within us that continues to live on in the lives of others. Name movie: The Godfather (1972)

Love Classical Music and Movies 🎺🎻💖🎥🎬

33,163 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten