Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Intelligence Asset EXPOSES Iran Nuclear Deal SHOCKER A high-level intelligence source claims to hold corroborating material — including recorded discussions touching on South Korea, Pakistan and Iran’s nuclear program — suggesting major political actors were involved in questionable back-channel dealings. If true, these allegations point to covert influence, nuclear...

25,490 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Israel launched a defensive and preemptive strike against Iran’s nuclear operations. Here’s what we know so far. Israel targeted Iran’s nuclear sites, their ballistic missile programs, nuclear infrastructure, engineers, and nuclear scientists, and its top military commanders, including the Chief of Staff and the head of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard, a US designated terrorist organization that arms and funds groups like Hamas, Hezbollah, and the Houthis. These attacks unfolded in over five waves and at over 100 quality targets in operations that included aircrafts and additional on the ground intelligence activity. This is not a war between Israel and the Iranian people. This is a fight to stop a terrorist regime from acquiring the most dangerous weapon on earth. According to the IAEA, the UN nuclear watchdog, Iran is now capable of producing up to 15 nuclear bombs. In the last few months and while pretending to negotiate a deal with the US in good faith, Iran has accelerated its nuclear enrichment and weapons program. Iran is the head of the Middle Eastern snake. Their fingerprints can be found in every single bloody conflict in the region. Iran is the greatest sponsor of terrorism in the world and their regime oppresses their own people with their Islamist ideology. Israel cannot allow Iran to have a nuclear weapon. The Middle East cannot allow Iran to have a nuclear weapon. Because a nuclear Iran doesn’t just threaten Israel, it threatens the entire world.

Noa Tishby

24,122 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Listen very closely to what Trump says re: Obama and Iran… “Obama picked the wrong country.. he should have picked another country. I won’t tell you what it was..” Which country? Revisit— Why does Trump keep mentioning OBAMA and the PALLETS OF CASH? Q couldn’t tell anons without violation NATSEC laws, but Q did ask a series of questions that painted a dramatic picture that if you did the research, proved the Iran nuclear deal (JCPOA) was not what it seemed, and Uranium One (U1) material may have secretly ended up helping IRAN or SYRIA to build nuclear weapons. The official Iran nuclear deal was supposed to stop Iran’s nuclear program and keep it from getting weapons-grade material. BUT, It did the exact OPPOSTE. Q asksd: What if the program never actually stopped? What if Iran quietly built a hidden “satellite” nuclear site in northern Syria? And the explosive twist: What if uranium from the Uranium One deal (the U.S. uranium assets sold to Russia) somehow made its way to Iran or Syria? 👉 Obama and Hillary. Q even references the movie The Sum of All Fears — a story about terrorists getting a nuclear bomb made from stolen material — and says this real-world scenario would be “SUM OF ALL FEARS” level dangerous. Key Questions Q Raises Where did the pallets of cash the Obama administration sent to Iran actually go? How many secret plane deliveries happened, and did they all land in the same spot? Is the U1 material traceable? (Q answers: YES.) Did the U.S. government know about any of this? Yes. Were other “bad actors” (possibly Russia or others) involved in supplying the uranium? Yes Q repeatedly says “Define cover” — meaning the Iran deal and other official stories were just a smokescreen to hide what was really happening with the uranium transfers. WHY do you think Trump wants that Nuclear Dust? Q even ties it to real events: “Why did we strike Syria?” (referring to U.S. missile strikes in 2017–2018) The real reason, according to Q, was to deal with this hidden nuclear threat — not the public explanation. Bottom-Line Implication U.S. uranium → sold to Russia via Uranium One → diverted to Iran/Syria → with the Iran nuclear deal and cash payments used as cover. This is true, and it is now being revisited and it would mean the Clinton Foundation–linked deal (which Grassley’s recent letter is now re-examining) didn’t just risk U.S. security — they DIRECTLY ARMED America’s enemies with nuclear material, setting the stage for dirty bombs.. As Q later clarified in the 16 year plan to destroy America, MASS Extinction events via war were being planned. Until Trump won in 2016.

MJTruthUltra

187,530 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

HOLY SHIZZLES‼️ Uranium One enters the picture again.. 🚨 The Trump administration has reached agreement with SYRIA for the International Atomic Energy Agency to remove nuclear material stored at a COVERT SITE in Syria, Listen closely to Trump said in May. Obama and Hillary Clinton are SCREWED! —— “Obama picked the wrong country.. he should have picked another country. I won’t tell you what it was..” Which country? To understand what is happening, you have to Revisit the drops— Why does Trump keep mentioning OBAMA and the PALLETS OF CASH? Q couldn’t tell without violation NATSEC laws, but Q did ask a series of questions that painted a dramatic picture that if you did the research, proved the Iran nuclear deal (JCPOA) was not what it seemed, and Uranium One (U1) material may have secretly ended up helping IRAN or SYRIA build nuclear weapons. The official Iran nuclear deal was supposed to stop Iran’s nuclear program and keep it from getting weapons-grade material. BUT, It did the exact OPPOSTE. Q asksd: What if the program never actually stopped? What if Iran quietly built a hidden “satellite” nuclear site in northern Syria? KABOOM💥💥💥💥💥💥 What if uranium from the Uranium One deal (the U.S. uranium assets sold to Russia) somehow made its way to Iran or Syria? Hello 👉 Obama and Hillary. Q even references the movie The Sum of All Fears — a story about terrorists getting a nuclear bomb made from stolen material. Key Questions Q Raises Where did the pallets of cash the Obama administration sent to Iran actually go? How many secret plane deliveries happened, and did they all land in the same spot? Is the U1 material traceable? ( Q answers: YES. Did the U.S. government know about any of this? Yes. Were other “bad actors” (possibly Russia or others) involved in supplying the uranium? Yes Q repeatedly says “Define cover” — meaning the Iran deal and other official stories were just a smokescreen to hide what was really happening with the uranium transfers. Q even ties it to real events: “Why did we strike Syria?” (referring to U.S. missile strikes in 2017–2018) The real reason, according to Q, was to deal with this hidden nuclear threat — not the public explanation. U.S. uranium → sold to Russia via Uranium One → diverted to Iran/Syria → with the Iran nuclear deal and cash payments used as cover. This means Obama and the Hillary Clinton Foundation–linked deal DIRECTLY ARMED America’s enemies with nuclear material, setting the stage for dirty bombs.. 🔻 Uranium One was a Canadian mining company that, through acquisitions (including UrAsia Energy, co-founded by major Clinton Foundation donor Frank Giustra), controlled significant U.S. uranium assets—roughly 20% of U.S. uranium production capacity at the time (mines in Wyoming, Utah, etc.). Between 2009–2013, Russia’s state-owned nuclear giant Rosatom (via its subsidiary ARMZ) gradually acquired majority then full control of Uranium One in stages. Because this involved U.S. critical minerals, it required unanimous approval from the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS)—an interagency panel of 9+ cabinet-level departments, including State (then led by Hillary Clinton), Treasury, Defense, etc. CFIUS approved it in 2010; President Obama SIGNED OFF; the Nuclear Regulatory Commission followed. Frank Giustra: Canadian mining magnate and Clinton Foundation donor. In 2005, he and Bill Clinton traveled to Kazakhstan (a uranium-rich nation). Shortly after, Giustra’s UrAsia secured major Kazakh uranium concessions. Giustra later merged UrAsia into Uranium One (retaining stakes) and donated TENS OF MILLIONS to the Clinton Foundation (and pledged $100M+). Q repeatedly emphasized U1/Uranium as a cornerstone example of Clinton corruption and Pay-to-play treason to KILL the UNITED STATES FROM WITHIN, selling secrets, SAPs, AID, etc. — but it was “More than selling of URANIUM… >Crimes against Humanity”

MJTruthUltra

213,373 görüntüleme • 12 gün önce

🎥 Will Iran Abandon Nuclear Restraint? For decades, Iran has refrained from developing nuclear weapons—not because it lacked the technical capacity, but because of a deliberate political and religious decision. A fatwa from the Supreme Leader declared nuclear arms forbidden under Islam. But after the U.S. and Israel bombed three Iranian nuclear sites this weekend—sites under regular IAEA inspection—that restraint is now under serious strain. “There are people in Iran asking that question right now,” Dr. Foad Izadi told Drop Site’. The question: What’s the point of cooperation? Izadi noted that two nuclear-armed states just launched an unprovoked attack on a non-nuclear country, without credible evidence of a weapons program. He pointed to the U.S. intelligence community’s own March report, which states: ➤ Iran does not have a nuclear weapon. ➤ Iran does not have a nuclear weapons program. ➤ Iranian leaders have not made a decision to pursue one. Even IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi, Izadi said, has consistently affirmed: “We have never found a nuclear weapons program in Iran.” Yet, Iran was bombed anyway. Izadi explained that the IAEA report cited by Western governments referenced materials from 20 to 30 years ago—files Iran believed were closed under the 2015 nuclear deal. Tehran now suspects Mossad may have planted radioactive traces to fabricate suspicion and justify military strikes. “There’s a lot of confusion and disinformation,” he said. But for many Iranians, the conclusion is simple: Iran upheld its obligations—and was attacked regardless. That, Izadi points out, is forcing a national reckoning with the logic of nuclear restraint. (Apologies for the poor audio quality. We’ll share a subtitled version of the clip below) jeremy scahill | فواد ایزدی Foad Izadi

Drop Site

25,482 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Iran has proposed a deal to the U.S. to reopen the Strait of Hormuz and end the war, while deferring nuclear talks to a later stage. President Trump has summoned a Situation Room meeting today to decide Washington’s response. Why accepting this deal by the U.S. would be a defeat for the United States and a big victory for Iran, let’s understand in simple language: The Strait of Hormuz was open before the war, and it will be open after the war once peace is restored. Then what was the objective of this war? This will remain a big question. The initial objectives of the U.S. and Israel were regime change, seizing enriched uranium, and destroying Iran’s nuclear and long-range missile programs. Have they achieved any of these? No. Rather, after this deal, the Islamic regime will intensify its nuclear weapons and long-range missile programs without hesitation because they now know the weakness of the United States. Postponing discussions on the nuclear program indirectly means that Iran is not going to stop. What are the future repercussions of this deal? Many independent journalists have reported that the current IRGC chief, Ahmad Wahidi, has ordered an intensification of the nuclear weapons development program. After a few months or years, Iran may have a nuclear bomb. Once Iran acquires nuclear weapons and long-range missiles, neither the United States nor any other country will be able to save Israel. The Islamic regime has the intent but not the capability to target the U.S. mainland; the day they gain that capability, they will target the U.S. mainland. In short, we can say that this is a trap for the U.S.

Baba Banaras™

36,866 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce