Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Interactive fluid web app 【インタラクティブな流体シミュレーション】 I ported PavelDoGreat/WebGL-Fluid-Simulation to the #p5js Web Editor. I added #MediaPipe so mouse/touch controls work with both hands on camera. #TensorFlowJS

111,006 views • 11 months ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

IF YOU SPIN A FEW MIN A DAY YOU REVERSE AGING, RAPIDLY, 1 OF 9999999999 BENEFITS OR CURES HOW TO SPIN: Move from left to right, spinning around and focusing your vision on your left thumb. Then spin from right to left, focus your vision on your right thumb. When you complete spinning, however many times you spin, bring your palms together at chest level. Press them together, keeping your eyes open, and balance yourself with your feet a shoulder's width apart so that you feel anchored and still feel the spinning at the same time. This tremendously accelerates the spinning of the chakra systems inside your body. Many suggest to spin only clockwise but from my experience both directions are necessary! I spin in both directions. I find that I can really stimulate the vestibular system by spinning one way and then suddenly switching to another direction. Its different for everyone but the main goal is to make the fluid in the vestibular system to move in as many different directions as possible. The fluid in the vestibular system has both physical and spiritual qualities. It can be influenced by physical movements and it also can be influence through non physical stimuli like thoughts, emotion, aura fields etc. Eventually you will be able to move the fluid by will. The fluid is what creates the vortex you see. The key to spirituality is the fluid. If you can manage to keep the fluid stimulated and in activity you will be truly spiritual. As a child you had a heightened spirituality! Dont worry, nothing has been lost it’s still all inside you!

9

92,801 views • 5 months ago

I failed to make a web app on both Replit & Lovable (and I code). I still think every PM should try this at least once. Bottom line: • I didn't need to "code," but at some point I was definitely doing engineering. • Building a complex web application takes babysitting • These tools are amazing for expressing ideas and visualizing data • PMs, try this out! It builds intuition for being on the other side of an agent (and now you don't have to be afraid of failing) My background: I can build web apps (though I became a PM because I was pretty bad at it) What I wanted to build: I wanted to replicate Graphtreon (unofficial patreon scraper and public revenue dashboard), but for Maven (where my course is hosted). How it went for me: 🟢 ChatGPT/Claude helped me iterate to a great prompt (literally, "help me write a prompt for an AI LLM prototyping tool to build a web app that...") 🟢 I pasted that into both Lovable and Replit (why not open two tabs) 🟢 Iterating on the UI was awesome. If I kept feedback high-level, it would think of all the little flow details on its own (confirmation dialogs, errors) 🟡 It had backend powers, but needed *a lot* of obvious help on setting up simple backend web scraping (not nobel prize type work) 🟡 I tried to "empower" it with higher-level goals, but kept getting dragged back down to troubleshooting 🔴 I found myself babysitting every error, and building features solely for the purpose of observability and debugging 🔴 I was having fun, but for the wrong reasons (breaking through frustrating walls rather than for outcomes, insights, or innovation) That said, my friend succeeded. A former PM colleague (now founder) successfully built a web app using Lovable, and reported the same experience. He succeeded because he was way more persistent (spent many days fully focused on this) and also smarter. These tools are in a weird, adolescent neither-here-nor-there stage. That said, I'm still super impressed, and can't believe this even exists. Most importantly for product managers: I recommend trying this hands-on ✓ Timebox yourself to an hour ✓ What's a piece of software you didn't get approval to buy? ✓ Allow yourself to get in the weeds, if only as an exercise ✓ Build intuition for what it's like to be on the other side of an agent doing something really complex. Now you don't have to feel bad if you fail :)

Tal Raviv

41,324 views • 1 year ago

AGI before 2030 or after 2030? Sergey Brin: "Before." Demis Hassabis: "Just after." Sergey Brin laughed. "No pressure, Demis." "I can ask for it. He needs to deliver it." They spent 4 minutes answering rapid-fire questions: The first question was about the web. Alex: "What does the web look like in 10 years?" Sergey paused. "10 years, because of the rate of progress in AI, is so far beyond anything we can foresee." "Not just the web. I don't think we really know what the world looks like in 10 years." Demis agreed. "The web is going to change quite a lot if you think about an agent-first web." "It doesn't necessarily need to render things the way we do as humans using the web." "Things will be pretty different in a few years." They were asked about hiring. Alex: "Would you hire someone who used AI in their interview?" Demis: "Depends how they used it. Using today's models and tools, probably not. But it depends how they would use it, actually." Sergey: "I mean, I've never interviewed at all." The room laughed. Demis: "I haven't either, actually." Then they were asked about simulation theory. Demis had tweeted a video of AI generating a natural scene. The caption: "Nature to simulation at the press of a button. Does make you wonder." Headlines said he thinks we're in a simulation. His answer. "Not in the way that Nick Bostrom and people talk about." "I don't think this is some kind of game, even though I wrote a lot of games." "I do think that ultimately underlying physics is information theory. We're in a computational universe. But it's not just a straightforward simulation." "The fact that these systems are able to model real structures in nature is quite interesting and telling." "I've been thinking a lot about our work with AlphaGo and AlphaFold." "Maybe at some point I'll write up a scientific paper about what I think that really means in terms of what's actually going on here in reality." Sergey pushed further. "That argument applies recursively." "If we're in a simulation, then by the same argument, whatever beings are making the simulation are themselves in a simulation. For roughly the same reasons. And so on and so forth." "You're going to have to either accept that we're in an infinite stack of simulations. Or that there's got to be some stopping criteria." Alex: "What's your best guess?" "I think we're taking a very anthropocentric view." "When we say simulation, we mean some kind of conscious being is running a simulation that we are then in. And that they have some kind of semblance of desire and consciousness that's similar to us." "That's where it kind of breaks down for me." "I just don't think that we're really equipped to reason about one level up in the hierarchy."

Jaynit

101,919 views • 26 days ago