Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Interesting throwback resurfacing amid the Tyler Robinson preliminary hearing. In this early KSL interview, Kristen Schwerman Tyler Robinson’s neighbor and longtime school custodian who knew him and his brothers described him as a quiet, smart, mellow kid who “never caused any problems.” She expressed being genuinely shocked by the... news. Notable details: The interview aired after Tyler was already in custody. A grey Dodge Challenger (the vehicle tied to the case) is visible parked right behind her in the shot. She stated she did not recognize Tyler in the initial suspect photos/footage released by authorities, saying he had covered his face well enough. With the hearing now concluded including the playback of Lance Twiggs’ interview, discussions of evidence like texts, DNA, and surveillance this early neighbor perspective stands out. It captures the contrast between how those who knew him locally viewed him versus the allegations now in court. What do you make of it? Does the “quiet kid” description surprise you, or does it fit a familiar pattern in these cases? Share your thoughts below. #TylerRobinson #CharlieKirk #UtahNews #TrueCrimeshow more

WeThePeople

2,762 subscribers

53,806 views • 6 days ago •via X (Twitter)

Science & Technology News & Politics Education

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

🚨 NEW RING CAMERA FOOTAGE played in Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing today. Prosecutors claim it shows him pulling up in his Challenger in the middle of the night, getting out, then returning and leaving within just a few hours. Only problem? The footage is so grainy you can’t clearly make out if it’s even Tyler — or if it’s even his car. If this is the quality of evidence they’re using to tie him to the scene, the case just got a lot weaker. The timeline keeps falling apart under scrutiny. C: Candace Owens

🚨 NEW RING CAMERA FOOTAGE played in Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing today. Prosecutors claim it shows him pulling up in his Challenger in the middle of the night, getting out, then returning and leaving within just a few hours. Only problem? The footage is so grainy you can’t clearly make out if it’s even Tyler — or if it’s even his car. If this is the quality of evidence they’re using to tie him to the scene, the case just got a lot weaker. The timeline keeps falling apart under scrutiny. C: Candace Owens

Project Constitution

709,792 views • 11 days ago

🔥👀 LANCE TWIGGS VIDEO TESTIMONY IS PLAYED in the Provo, Utah courtroom for the world to see after attempts by the Tyler Robinson defense to prevent it. “ HE HAD SAID HE WAS PLANNING ON GOING HUNTING WITH HIS FAMILY & WANTED TO ENGRAVE MESSAGES ON BULLETS” - Twiggs Twiggs is shown a note and explains finding it under his computer keyboard. He then took a picture of it. He then asks him about the discord messages. Robinson played D&D. He was asking for a tool to do this a month before at most. Says they met in 2023. He first met his as a new roommate. Says they BEGAN DATING months after they moved in. Tyler Robinson spent the night of the 9th & 10th and left early because Tyler claimed he had a LONG RIDE to work. Says Tyler did not message him all day until 11pm on the 10th This is the video deposition regarding the assassination of Charlie Kirk by alleged assassin Tyler Robinson Twiggs seems to confirm he engraved the bullets. 👀Jack Posobiec

🔥👀 LANCE TWIGGS VIDEO TESTIMONY IS PLAYED in the Provo, Utah courtroom for the world to see after attempts by the Tyler Robinson defense to prevent it. “ HE HAD SAID HE WAS PLANNING ON GOING HUNTING WITH HIS FAMILY & WANTED TO ENGRAVE MESSAGES ON BULLETS” - Twiggs Twiggs is shown a note and explains finding it under his computer keyboard. He then took a picture of it. He then asks him about the discord messages. Robinson played D&D. He was asking for a tool to do this a month before at most. Says they met in 2023. He first met his as a new roommate. Says they BEGAN DATING months after they moved in. Tyler Robinson spent the night of the 9th & 10th and left early because Tyler claimed he had a LONG RIDE to work. Says Tyler did not message him all day until 11pm on the 10th This is the video deposition regarding the assassination of Charlie Kirk by alleged assassin Tyler Robinson Twiggs seems to confirm he engraved the bullets. 👀Jack Posobiec

Johnny St.Pete

20,756 views • 8 days ago

🚨 THOUGHT EXPERIMENT: What if Tyler and Lance’s Roles Were ACTUALLY Reversed? What if Tyler Robinson is the one who turned someone in, not Lance? Looking at these screenshots that were released, there’s some very sloppy editing going on. Multiple photos show heavy blurring on hands, floors, trim, and clothing — almost like someone was trying to hide the background or who was actually in the room. Even more interesting: the trim, flooring, and wall colors in some of these “Lance” photos match the exact interrogation room where Tyler was being questioned. And in one of the images, you can clearly see what looks like Tyler’s shoe that they tried (and failed) to blur out. It’s starting to look like these photos were taken in the same room, with Tyler being the one showing the messages. The “blurry hand” and photoshopped background in several shots only make it more suspicious. What if the narrative we’ve been fed is backwards? What if Tyler Robinson is the one who flipped… and they’ve been editing the evidence to make it look like it was Lance?

🚨 THOUGHT EXPERIMENT: What if Tyler and Lance’s Roles Were ACTUALLY Reversed? What if Tyler Robinson is the one who turned someone in, not Lance? Looking at these screenshots that were released, there’s some very sloppy editing going on. Multiple photos show heavy blurring on hands, floors, trim, and clothing — almost like someone was trying to hide the background or who was actually in the room. Even more interesting: the trim, flooring, and wall colors in some of these “Lance” photos match the exact interrogation room where Tyler was being questioned. And in one of the images, you can clearly see what looks like Tyler’s shoe that they tried (and failed) to blur out. It’s starting to look like these photos were taken in the same room, with Tyler being the one showing the messages. The “blurry hand” and photoshopped background in several shots only make it more suspicious. What if the narrative we’ve been fed is backwards? What if Tyler Robinson is the one who flipped… and they’ve been editing the evidence to make it look like it was Lance?

Project Constitution

52,330 views • 4 days ago

🚨 BOMBSHELL: Tyler Robinson's FAMILY Speaks Out—Say's Only 2% Of What YOU Are Hearing In The Mainstream Media Is TRUE😳 The establishment media narrative surrounding Tyler Robinson is completely unravelling. Brandi and Billie, hosts of the Brandi and Billie ShowZ, just dropped massive new information after speaking directly with a member of Tyler Robinson’s family inside the courtroom—and what they revealed changes everything. Here are the critical takeaways from their courtroom discussion: When asked why the family hasn't spoken out to independent journalists to clear the air, the family member stated that it doesn't matter who they talk to because the media will misconstrue it. She then dropped this bombshell: Only 2% of what the public is hearing about Tyler is true. The mainstream media has relentlessly pushed the story that Tyler’s own family (specifically his father) turned him in. But when Brandi and Billie asked the family member point-blank if Tyler was capable of carrying out this assassination, her answer was an immediate, definitive "NO." As Brandi pointed out, if the family truly believed he was a lone-wolf assassin and actively turned him in to the authorities, they would not be sitting in a courtroom telling independent podcasters that he is completely incapable of the crime and that the media is lying about him. The narrative of the "guilty family turning in their radicalized son" appears to be a total fabrication. Even the UVU eyewitness sitting next to them in the courtroom—who initially argued Tyler was the shooter—eventually admitted after looking at the photos that the bone structure and chin of the man in the stairwell do not match the real-life photos of Tyler Robinson. If Tyler didn't pull the trigger, and his family knows he isn't capable of it... who is the man in the stairwell photos? And why is the media working so hard to pin this entirely on Tyler? The setup is becoming obvious. Tyler may have been involved in some capacity, but he did not act alone, and he did not pull that trigger. 🚩🇺🇸 FOLLOW brandiandbillieshow and watch their FULL episoe linked below. 👇

🚨 BOMBSHELL: Tyler Robinson's FAMILY Speaks Out—Say's Only 2% Of What YOU Are Hearing In The Mainstream Media Is TRUE😳 The establishment media narrative surrounding Tyler Robinson is completely unravelling. Brandi and Billie, hosts of the Brandi and Billie ShowZ, just dropped massive new information after speaking directly with a member of Tyler Robinson’s family inside the courtroom—and what they revealed changes everything. Here are the critical takeaways from their courtroom discussion: When asked why the family hasn't spoken out to independent journalists to clear the air, the family member stated that it doesn't matter who they talk to because the media will misconstrue it. She then dropped this bombshell: Only 2% of what the public is hearing about Tyler is true. The mainstream media has relentlessly pushed the story that Tyler’s own family (specifically his father) turned him in. But when Brandi and Billie asked the family member point-blank if Tyler was capable of carrying out this assassination, her answer was an immediate, definitive "NO." As Brandi pointed out, if the family truly believed he was a lone-wolf assassin and actively turned him in to the authorities, they would not be sitting in a courtroom telling independent podcasters that he is completely incapable of the crime and that the media is lying about him. The narrative of the "guilty family turning in their radicalized son" appears to be a total fabrication. Even the UVU eyewitness sitting next to them in the courtroom—who initially argued Tyler was the shooter—eventually admitted after looking at the photos that the bone structure and chin of the man in the stairwell do not match the real-life photos of Tyler Robinson. If Tyler didn't pull the trigger, and his family knows he isn't capable of it... who is the man in the stairwell photos? And why is the media working so hard to pin this entirely on Tyler? The setup is becoming obvious. Tyler may have been involved in some capacity, but he did not act alone, and he did not pull that trigger. 🚩🇺🇸 FOLLOW brandiandbillieshow and watch their FULL episoe linked below. 👇

Project Constitution

274,058 views • 3 months ago

‼️Candace Owens On The Shawn Ryan Podcast: "Tyler Robinson Is Total Patsy" — He Was Set Up By Lance Twiggs In the interview, Candace said she’s confident Tyler Robinson did not murder Charlie Kirk. At most, she believes he may have been an accessory — but she strongly suspects he was set up. She pointed directly at Tyler’s roommate and boyfriend, Lance Twiggs, calling him a likely federal asset. Candace noted that it’s “bonkers” the police never even questioned Lance, despite him being central to the official story they’re pushing. Her reasoning: If they were in a relationship, Lance would have had easy access to Tyler’s guns. It would have been simple for Lance to set Tyler up. She suggested Tyler may have been blackmailed, possibly through “weird stuff online” — the easiest way for the feds to control someone. This lines up with what many of us have been saying for months: Tyler Robinson doesn’t fit the profile of a lone gunman. The speed at which the “official story” was locked in, combined with the lack of scrutiny on Lance Twiggs, has always been one of the biggest red flags. If Lance Twiggs really is a federal asset who set Tyler up, then this wasn’t just a random act of violence — it was a coordinated operation. The more we learn, the clearer it becomes that the public is not being told the full story about what happened at UVU. FOLLOW Candace Owens and Shawn Ryan RT this. The truth is starting to come out.

Project Constitution

24,389 views • 14 days ago

🚨The Case Against Tyler Robinson Is Collapsing in Plain Sight! The Tyler Robinson hearing is an absolute joke, and the record so far makes that painfully clear. The state’s key evidence, a “surveillance compilation” edited by the Utah Attorney General’s office, was rejected for alterations, and there is still no raw, uncut footage of the assassination. The officer on scene couldn’t even recover the shell casing from Robinson’s alleged rifle, and the DNA on the towel is 95% linked to Lance Twiggs, not Tyler Robinson. To make matters worse, the officer’s bodycam was conveniently turned off at the most critical moments. As it stands today, the state has zero solid evidence actually tying Tyler Robinson to the assassination of Charlie Kirk. 🇺🇸Lionel🇺🇸 joins me to break down how a case this weak ever made it into a courtroom.

🚨The Case Against Tyler Robinson Is Collapsing in Plain Sight! The Tyler Robinson hearing is an absolute joke, and the record so far makes that painfully clear. The state’s key evidence, a “surveillance compilation” edited by the Utah Attorney General’s office, was rejected for alterations, and there is still no raw, uncut footage of the assassination. The officer on scene couldn’t even recover the shell casing from Robinson’s alleged rifle, and the DNA on the towel is 95% linked to Lance Twiggs, not Tyler Robinson. To make matters worse, the officer’s bodycam was conveniently turned off at the most critical moments. As it stands today, the state has zero solid evidence actually tying Tyler Robinson to the assassination of Charlie Kirk. 🇺🇸Lionel🇺🇸 joins me to break down how a case this weak ever made it into a courtroom.

Ben Swann

305,791 views • 9 days ago

Tyler Robinson, the man who killed Charlie Kirk, was captured on UVU campus security footage well before the incident. According to the footage presented to the court, Tyler arrived on campus in his vehicle, then walked around scouting the area extensively. University officials also confirm they have clear facial images of him from the recordings. This directly contradicts earlier claims that Tyler never stepped foot on the UVU campus. Candace Owens repeatedly stated to her audience for months that Tyler Robinson never visited the campus and claimed high-level sources confirmed it. She lied.

Tyler Robinson, the man who killed Charlie Kirk, was captured on UVU campus security footage well before the incident. According to the footage presented to the court, Tyler arrived on campus in his vehicle, then walked around scouting the area extensively. University officials also confirm they have clear facial images of him from the recordings. This directly contradicts earlier claims that Tyler never stepped foot on the UVU campus. Candace Owens repeatedly stated to her audience for months that Tyler Robinson never visited the campus and claimed high-level sources confirmed it. She lied.

Ian Miles Cheong

30,611 views • 3 months ago

Yesterday, a number of journalists who attended the Tyler Robinson preliminary hearing reported that clear video evidence of Tyler taking the shot from the roof was presented. The video was not shown to the public because of the judge’s order (due to the clerical error of showing Tyler Robinson’s alleged confession note the day before). Immediately, other journalists who were also in attendance reported that the video did NOT show Tyler Robinson taking the shot, and that those journalists were lying, repeating “fed slop”. The reality is that both journalists are correct. The video (which was merely enhanced video of segments the public had already seen) showed the man *identified* as Tyler on the roof, in the prone position, taking the shot, and then fleeing. It did not show his face (I verified with a couple of people in respect of their posts). So on the one hand, you have journalists reporting that the video clearly showed the man *who had been previously identified as Tyler Robinson* taking the shot. And on the other hand, you have journalist saying the video did not show Tyler specifically (in terms of close-up on his face for facial recognition). This is the exact confusion and spin I specifically predicted would happen during my appearance on Megyn Kelly that morning. Had the public seen the video, there would have been no confusion in what was meant by the various reports. But the judge, in his order denying transparency to the judicial process, allowed for this confusion to occur and be weaponized to taint the entire judicial process. The judge, in his idiotic ruling to not display exhibits on the final day of the hearing, in an effort to split the judicial baby to please both parties, killed the judicial baby.

Yesterday, a number of journalists who attended the Tyler Robinson preliminary hearing reported that clear video evidence of Tyler taking the shot from the roof was presented. The video was not shown to the public because of the judge’s order (due to the clerical error of showing Tyler Robinson’s alleged confession note the day before). Immediately, other journalists who were also in attendance reported that the video did NOT show Tyler Robinson taking the shot, and that those journalists were lying, repeating “fed slop”. The reality is that both journalists are correct. The video (which was merely enhanced video of segments the public had already seen) showed the man identified as Tyler on the roof, in the prone position, taking the shot, and then fleeing. It did not show his face (I verified with a couple of people in respect of their posts). So on the one hand, you have journalists reporting that the video clearly showed the man who had been previously identified as Tyler Robinson taking the shot. And on the other hand, you have journalist saying the video did not show Tyler specifically (in terms of close-up on his face for facial recognition). This is the exact confusion and spin I specifically predicted would happen during my appearance on Megyn Kelly that morning. Had the public seen the video, there would have been no confusion in what was meant by the various reports. But the judge, in his order denying transparency to the judicial process, allowed for this confusion to occur and be weaponized to taint the entire judicial process. The judge, in his idiotic ruling to not display exhibits on the final day of the hearing, in an effort to split the judicial baby to please both parties, killed the judicial baby.

Viva Frei

146,428 views • 6 days ago

🚨 JUST NOW: The Tyler Robinson defense is PANICKING, objecting to the release of evidence involving transgender lover Lance Twiggs in the Kirk assassination hearing They even found a towel matching the DNA of BOTH Robinson and Twiggs on-scene 🤯 Justice for Charlie Kirk means NO MORE DELAYS and release it ALL. All evidence points to SHUT-AND-DRY CASE. The liars are sweating right now. "You can tell a lot by what the defense is concerned with by what they've been objecting to...this recorded statement from Lance Twiggs."

🚨 JUST NOW: The Tyler Robinson defense is PANICKING, objecting to the release of evidence involving transgender lover Lance Twiggs in the Kirk assassination hearing They even found a towel matching the DNA of BOTH Robinson and Twiggs on-scene 🤯 Justice for Charlie Kirk means NO MORE DELAYS and release it ALL. All evidence points to SHUT-AND-DRY CASE. The liars are sweating right now. "You can tell a lot by what the defense is concerned with by what they've been objecting to...this recorded statement from Lance Twiggs."

Eric Daugherty

106,539 views • 9 days ago

🚨BREAKING: Erika Kirk GETTING BRIEFED By The PROSECUTION In The Tyler Robinson Case?! She Isn't Even A WITNESS In a Fox News interview, Erika Kirk drops a bombshell: "I've seen what the case is built on." Wait—what? She seems to be implying that the prosecution has been briefing her on the Evidence In The Tyler Robinson case. Is the prosecution briefing Charlie Kirk''s WIDOW on evidence details? She's not even a WITNESS. Wasn't there—said she was at her mom's hospital room. That's fine, but why the VIP access to prosecution intel? This reeks of impropriety. FBI's handling of this case needs SCRUTINY. Are they scripting the narrative? Shoutout to RealBaronPodcast for spotting this as well—teamwork makes the dream work. GO FOLLOW HIM! What do you think—Is this right or improper? Drop your takes below.

🚨BREAKING: Erika Kirk GETTING BRIEFED By The PROSECUTION In The Tyler Robinson Case?! She Isn't Even A WITNESS In a Fox News interview, Erika Kirk drops a bombshell: "I've seen what the case is built on." Wait—what? She seems to be implying that the prosecution has been briefing her on the Evidence In The Tyler Robinson case. Is the prosecution briefing Charlie Kirk''s WIDOW on evidence details? She's not even a WITNESS. Wasn't there—said she was at her mom's hospital room. That's fine, but why the VIP access to prosecution intel? This reeks of impropriety. FBI's handling of this case needs SCRUTINY. Are they scripting the narrative? Shoutout to RealBaronPodcast for spotting this as well—teamwork makes the dream work. GO FOLLOW HIM! What do you think—Is this right or improper? Drop your takes below.

Project Constitution

183,513 views • 8 months ago

Can someone, anyone, explain the major discrepancies in Lance Twiggs’s testimony that I’m hearing? 1. Lance testified that Tyler did not text him directly AT ALL on September 10th. He testified that the only message that came through that day was via an automated Discord message from Tyler to a D&D server group chat that they were both a part of at 11 pm. Why then are we shown screenshots of a personal text message thread from September 10th where there are texts from Tyler to Lance starting at 4:33 pm?? There’s also a direct text supposedly from Tyler at 11 pm as well — is that what’s being referred to as the “automated” message (although it’s not remotely from Discord)?? Tyler then supposedly sends a flurry of texts detailing his crime to Lance all before midnight. Why did Lance not account for any of these messages when he said Tyler “did not text him directly” all day?? 2. How would Lance know if the one 11 pm text message was “automated” when iMessage doesn’t differentiate between messages that are scheduled before or sent in the moment? 3. Prosecutor Ryan McBride, in his interview of Lance, while reading the messages exchanged.. said clear as day that the messages spanned from September 10th to September 12th. Lance agrees with this. Seconds later, he changes the story and says the messages were from September 10th to the evening of September 11th. Why? Agent Brian Davis, while on the stand, then testified to the messages ending September 11th, but the attorney who questioned him also sounded majorly confused based on what she was reading. She kept saying: “Does September 12th.. make more sense? Does it make sense?” Why did she initially ALSO say September 12th but then backtrack?? 4. Lance says in his testimony that he picked the note up and then never saw it again. Did he not burn it? How could he not pick it up again if he did that. Why was there no testimony to him burning it?

Can someone, anyone, explain the major discrepancies in Lance Twiggs’s testimony that I’m hearing? 1. Lance testified that Tyler did not text him directly AT ALL on September 10th. He testified that the only message that came through that day was via an automated Discord message from Tyler to a D&D server group chat that they were both a part of at 11 pm. Why then are we shown screenshots of a personal text message thread from September 10th where there are texts from Tyler to Lance starting at 4:33 pm?? There’s also a direct text supposedly from Tyler at 11 pm as well — is that what’s being referred to as the “automated” message (although it’s not remotely from Discord)?? Tyler then supposedly sends a flurry of texts detailing his crime to Lance all before midnight. Why did Lance not account for any of these messages when he said Tyler “did not text him directly” all day?? 2. How would Lance know if the one 11 pm text message was “automated” when iMessage doesn’t differentiate between messages that are scheduled before or sent in the moment? 3. Prosecutor Ryan McBride, in his interview of Lance, while reading the messages exchanged.. said clear as day that the messages spanned from September 10th to September 12th. Lance agrees with this. Seconds later, he changes the story and says the messages were from September 10th to the evening of September 11th. Why? Agent Brian Davis, while on the stand, then testified to the messages ending September 11th, but the attorney who questioned him also sounded majorly confused based on what she was reading. She kept saying: “Does September 12th.. make more sense? Does it make sense?” Why did she initially ALSO say September 12th but then backtrack?? 4. Lance says in his testimony that he picked the note up and then never saw it again. Did he not burn it? How could he not pick it up again if he did that. Why was there no testimony to him burning it?

Brave Report

21,523 views • 5 days ago

$This one is crazy. If ever there was a case that you could point to as police brutality, this one is it. It’s early morning in Paulding County, Georgia. 29-year-old Tyler Canaris is doing what millions of us do every day—he’s waiting for his ride to work. Tyler is a landscaper, minding his own business, when Deputy Michael McMaster pulls up. In the blink of an eye Tyler Canaris was body-slammed so hard by Paulding County Deputy Michael McMaster that his skull fractured. Tyler was an innocent man waiting for his ride to work. He didn't have a weapon. He wasn't committing a crime. After the slam you can hear Tyler is in pain. Instead of offering help, McMaster mocked him and told him to shut up and act like a man. One of the most disturbing parts of this case is how long it took for consequences to arrive. For nearly a year, the Paulding County Sheriff’s Office did nothing. McMaster remained on the force, and Tyler was the one facing criminal charges for "obstruction." It wasn't until the GBI stepped in—that McMaster was finally fired. But even then, the department claimed he was fired for "policy violations" unrelated to the GBI’s use-of-force investigation. No Charges to this day, Michael McMaster has not been criminally charged for the injuries he inflicted on Tyler. Despite a GBI investigation, no indictment has been handed down. While Tyler lives with metal plates in his body and $75,000 in debt, the man who put him there remains a free man. Tyler filed a federal civil rights lawsuit (Section 1983) seeking accountability. However, the path to justice hit a major wall: Parts of the case faced significant hurdles in District Court, as his case was dismissed by the district court with prejudice. In early 2026, the case moved to the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals. Tyler’s legal team is fighting to overturn rulings that have stalled his pursuit of damages. As of right now, the court is still processing briefs, meaning Tyler is years away from a potential settlement or trial. What is your take on this case, I look forward to reading your comments below.$

This one is crazy. If ever there was a case that you could point to as police brutality, this one is it. It’s early morning in Paulding County, Georgia. 29-year-old Tyler Canaris is doing what millions of us do every day—he’s waiting for his ride to work. Tyler is a landscaper, minding his own business, when Deputy Michael McMaster pulls up. In the blink of an eye Tyler Canaris was body-slammed so hard by Paulding County Deputy Michael McMaster that his skull fractured. Tyler was an innocent man waiting for his ride to work. He didn't have a weapon. He wasn't committing a crime. After the slam you can hear Tyler is in pain. Instead of offering help, McMaster mocked him and told him to shut up and act like a man. One of the most disturbing parts of this case is how long it took for consequences to arrive. For nearly a year, the Paulding County Sheriff’s Office did nothing. McMaster remained on the force, and Tyler was the one facing criminal charges for "obstruction." It wasn't until the GBI stepped in—that McMaster was finally fired. But even then, the department claimed he was fired for "policy violations" unrelated to the GBI’s use-of-force investigation. No Charges to this day, Michael McMaster has not been criminally charged for the injuries he inflicted on Tyler. Despite a GBI investigation, no indictment has been handed down. While Tyler lives with metal plates in his body and $75,000 in debt, the man who put him there remains a free man. Tyler filed a federal civil rights lawsuit (Section 1983) seeking accountability. However, the path to justice hit a major wall: Parts of the case faced significant hurdles in District Court, as his case was dismissed by the district court with prejudice. In early 2026, the case moved to the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals. Tyler’s legal team is fighting to overturn rulings that have stalled his pursuit of damages. As of right now, the court is still processing briefs, meaning Tyler is years away from a potential settlement or trial. What is your take on this case, I look forward to reading your comments below.

Giggling Ganon

54,069 views • 2 months ago

🚨 BREAKING: The Prosecution Hand-Picked Tyler Robinson’s Defense Team —How Is This Even Legal?! I’m blown away right now. The prosecution in the Tyler Robinson case — the man accused of killing Charlie Kirk — actually hand-picked his defense attorney. Let that sink in. The prosecution picked the person who is supposed to DEFEND Tyler. How on earth is that constitutional? How is that even allowed? The FBI’s case against Tyler Robinson has been full of holes from day one. Nothing adds up. Nothing. Any competent defense attorney would rip it apart and expose the reasonable doubt — unless, of course, the fix is already in. If the prosecutor gets to pick their own “opponent,” what do you think happens? They’ll pick someone who’s soft, someone who will throw the case, someone who makes sure the prosecution wins. Even journalists like Elizabeth Lane are raising alarms. She said on Redacted that when she tried to help find Tyler a lawyer, she was told only the state could choose representation for him. The state prosecutor is essentially choosing who defends the man he’s prosecuting. This isn’t just shady. It’s a mockery of justice. And it’s exactly how you frame someone as a patsy. Whether or not Tyler Robinson owns the gun, there is zero evidence he pulled the trigger. Yet they’re going to make it stick — and now we’re watching how they’re doing it. This is how corrupt systems work. They don’t just control the narrative. They control the courts. We have to call this out NOW before it’s too late.

🚨 BREAKING: The Prosecution Hand-Picked Tyler Robinson’s Defense Team —How Is This Even Legal?! I’m blown away right now. The prosecution in the Tyler Robinson case — the man accused of killing Charlie Kirk — actually hand-picked his defense attorney. Let that sink in. The prosecution picked the person who is supposed to DEFEND Tyler. How on earth is that constitutional? How is that even allowed? The FBI’s case against Tyler Robinson has been full of holes from day one. Nothing adds up. Nothing. Any competent defense attorney would rip it apart and expose the reasonable doubt — unless, of course, the fix is already in. If the prosecutor gets to pick their own “opponent,” what do you think happens? They’ll pick someone who’s soft, someone who will throw the case, someone who makes sure the prosecution wins. Even journalists like Elizabeth Lane are raising alarms. She said on Redacted that when she tried to help find Tyler a lawyer, she was told only the state could choose representation for him. The state prosecutor is essentially choosing who defends the man he’s prosecuting. This isn’t just shady. It’s a mockery of justice. And it’s exactly how you frame someone as a patsy. Whether or not Tyler Robinson owns the gun, there is zero evidence he pulled the trigger. Yet they’re going to make it stick — and now we’re watching how they’re doing it. This is how corrupt systems work. They don’t just control the narrative. They control the courts. We have to call this out NOW before it’s too late.

Project Constitution

94,804 views • 9 months ago

‼️BREAKING: Resurfaced Footage Captures New SUSPECT In All Black Fleeing UVU — Looks MORE Like Lance Twiggs Than Tyler Robinson New video has resurfaced showing a man running from the UVU crime scene on 9/10, filmed by a witness who believed he was the real suspect. The man is seen wearing all black, with a black backpack and long dark hair — matching multiple descriptions from that day. Construction worker Dylan Hope previously described coming into contact with a man right after the shooting who said “someone’s been shot.” He described him as wearing a black trench coat, black cargo pants, black COVID mask, black sunglasses, and having long greasy black hair while carrying a small backpack. That description also closely matches what was broadcast over police dispatch that day: a suspect wearing all black, black mask, and carrying a long gun. The only known footage of a person on the roof also shows someone dressed entirely in black in a prone position on the Losee building. This new video does not appear to show Tyler Robinson — however, the man in the video bears a noticeable resemblance to Lance Twiggs — particularly in hair length, color, and profile, though the footage is too blurry to make a positive identification. If this is the same person seen on the roof and the same individual who approached the construction crew, it raises serious questions about who was actually at the scene that day. The descriptions of the person seen running, the person on the roof, and the individual who approached the construction crew are all consistent with each other… and inconsistent with Tyler Robinson. Watch the video. Does this look like Lance Twiggs to you… or someone else? More questions than answers. Watch the video and tell me what you see. CC: Candace Owens Baron Coleman

Project Constitution

437,456 views • 7 days ago

Candace Owens acts like anybody who thinks Tyler Robinson is guilty is basing it solely only on the text message chain with Lance Twiggs. Yet she neglects to mention the strongest evidence against Tyler Robinson: Robinson's DNA linking him to Charlie's murder. "DNA consistent with Robinson’s was found on the trigger, other parts of the rifle, the fired cartridge casing, two of the three unfired cartridges, and the towel," according to the official Utah County charging document. If DNA evidence means nothing, then our entire system of justice in our country when it comes to homicide is...what? Completely fraudulent? Of course not.

Candace Owens acts like anybody who thinks Tyler Robinson is guilty is basing it solely only on the text message chain with Lance Twiggs. Yet she neglects to mention the strongest evidence against Tyler Robinson: Robinson's DNA linking him to Charlie's murder. "DNA consistent with Robinson’s was found on the trigger, other parts of the rifle, the fired cartridge casing, two of the three unfired cartridges, and the towel," according to the official Utah County charging document. If DNA evidence means nothing, then our entire system of justice in our country when it comes to homicide is...what? Completely fraudulent? Of course not.

Liz Wheeler

279,069 views • 7 months ago

Tyler Robinson Text Messages Deep Dive These text messages must be real otherwise the defense would get the case thrown out by simply producing the phone records. The messages include; • Direct confession by Tyler Robinson • His motive • Confirmation he was at the scene of the crime • Plan to escape with the gun, removing all evidence • That the gun was his grandfather's • The towel seen in the video of him dropping off the roof with his DNA on it • Engraving of the bullets seemingly before that info was publicly available • That his father suspected him from seeing the gun on TV • Confirmation that the deputy neighbor was with him when he turned himself in • Telling his lover to not talk to the media (which he hasn't) I don't understand how delusional someone must be to not realize this is absolute proof of guilt beyond any reasonable doubt. None of this requires trust in the FBI or MSM, the texts are from the telecoms.

Tyler Robinson Text Messages Deep Dive These text messages must be real otherwise the defense would get the case thrown out by simply producing the phone records. The messages include; • Direct confession by Tyler Robinson • His motive • Confirmation he was at the scene of the crime • Plan to escape with the gun, removing all evidence • That the gun was his grandfather's • The towel seen in the video of him dropping off the roof with his DNA on it • Engraving of the bullets seemingly before that info was publicly available • That his father suspected him from seeing the gun on TV • Confirmation that the deputy neighbor was with him when he turned himself in • Telling his lover to not talk to the media (which he hasn't) I don't understand how delusional someone must be to not realize this is absolute proof of guilt beyond any reasonable doubt. None of this requires trust in the FBI or MSM, the texts are from the telecoms.

Ashton Forbes

174,683 views • 9 months ago

🚨 TYLER ROBINSON SPEAKS IN 2ND COURT APPEARANCE 🚨 Judge: “Do we have Mr. Robinson present?” Tyler Robinson: “Yes, your honor.” The state prosecutor declares: “There is a substantial amount of discovery in this case. It is voluminous to say the least.” His public defender responds: “Massive amounts of digital discovery…and it is not our intent to waive a preliminary hearing in this matter.” Prosecutors also raised the gag order slapped down by Judge Tony Graf, a ruling that muzzles everyone tied to Charlie Kirk’s assassination from talking to the press. When a case already has “massive” discovery…and now they’re silencing every voice that could leak what’s inside…what does that tell you?

🚨 TYLER ROBINSON SPEAKS IN 2ND COURT APPEARANCE 🚨 Judge: “Do we have Mr. Robinson present?” Tyler Robinson: “Yes, your honor.” The state prosecutor declares: “There is a substantial amount of discovery in this case. It is voluminous to say the least.” His public defender responds: “Massive amounts of digital discovery…and it is not our intent to waive a preliminary hearing in this matter.” Prosecutors also raised the gag order slapped down by Judge Tony Graf, a ruling that muzzles everyone tied to Charlie Kirk’s assassination from talking to the press. When a case already has “massive” discovery…and now they’re silencing every voice that could leak what’s inside…what does that tell you?

HustleBitch

6,928,041 views • 9 months ago

🚨Breaking: Newly Uncovered Footage Appears to Show Tyler Robinson’s Grey Dodge Challenger Near UVU Neighborhood —Video Raises Many Questions Brand-new video surfaced from a neighborhood on West 925th St, showing a grey Dodge Challenger pulling up, parking, and the driver who looks like Tyler RobinsoN getting out to meet another individual in a second car. PROOF OF AN ACCOMPLICE!!! The Person was waring a reddish Teeshirt and shorts and very clearly did not walk with any kind of limp or unusual gait unlike the person in the other video released by TMZ which had a noticeable limp and completely different clothing. The clip is timestamped around the same window as key events near UVU — and viewers are already debating what it could mean. Take a look for yourself and drop your thoughts below 👇 What do you notice in this footage that others might have missed? Shoutout to Gray Hughes Investigates On Youtube who is the one who uncovered this crucial video. Make sure to SUBSCRIBE to his Youtube channel. I will drop the link to his original video in comments below.

Project Constitution

276,240 views • 9 months ago

🚨MUST WATCH: An ANGRY Candace Owens Sets The Recod Straight And CALLS OUT All Those Parroting The LIES About Tyler Robinson Turning Himself In And Confessing🤬🔥 Candace Owens just systematically dismantled the entire establishment narrative surrounding Tyler Robinson on her podcast, and it is absolutely infuriating how many people are still parroting these lies. If you still believe Tyler Robinson "turned himself in" or "confessed" to shooting Charlie Kirk, you have been severely manipulated by the Feds. Candace just set the record straight, and here are the undeniable facts: LIE #1: TYLER CONFESSED AND TURNED HIMSELF IN This never happened. If you walk into a police station and confess to a high-profile assassination, the very first thing they do is make you sign a sworn, written confession. No such document exists. Tyler Robinson has maintained his innocence from day one and has officially plead NOT GUILTY. LIE #2: HIS DAD TURNED HIM IN Another complete fabrication. Tyler's father never claimed his son was the shooter. In fact, sources close to the family confirm his father explicitly stated that the blurry surveillance footage of the shooter on the stairs did not look like Tyler (and let’s be honest, we all know it looked exactly like Robbie Hill). LIE #3: TYLER WAS SUICIDAL This was a narrative planted to make him look unstable and guilty. So, how did Tyler actually end up at the station? Enter Mike Mitchell, a former sheriff's deputy with a highly suspicious background who happened to be Tyler's old Boy Scout leader. Mitchell went to Tyler’s house and essentially threatened him: He told Tyler the Feds were going to raid his house with a SWAT team, put guns in his parents' faces, and likely shoot him dead unless he came down to the station "peacefully" to clear his name. Tyler went to the station because he was terrified of being murdered by the state, not because he was guilty. THE FED COVER-UP: The local police, the SWAT teams, and the Washington County sheriffs all know the Feds set Tyler up as a patsy. The Feds lied about the gun location. They kept bomb-sniffing dogs away from specific areas. And who was the one aggressively pushing the fake "confession" narrative to the public? Governor Spencer Cox and Kash Patel. They stood on stage, repeated the Masonic "33" signaling, and lied to the American people to shut down the investigation. Candace said it best: She is 99.9% sure Tyler Robinson did not shoot Charlie Kirk. The people pushing this narrative are protecting the real killers, and they are doing it for money. We are not going to let them railroad an innocent kid to protect the deep state. 🛡️👺 FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT and watch her FULL episode linked down below.👇

Project Constitution

110,236 views • 3 months ago

🚨 CHARLIE KIRK ASSASSINATION CASE IN TOTAL CHAOS — THE BULLET THAT KILLED HIM DOESN’T MATCH TYLER ROBINSON’S RIFLE Seven months after the shooting at a Utah Valley University campus event… the case just took a serious turn. In a new court filing, Tyler Robinson’s defense claims the ATF was unable to match the bullet recovered during Charlie Kirk’s autopsy to the rifle allegedly tied to Robinson. • The bullet that killed Kirk… not forensically linked to the gun • ATF report says there wasn’t enough evidence to make a match • Defense now asking to delay the preliminary hearing • Citing a “mountain” of material that could reshape the case This is where it gets complicated: • Legal experts say bullet mismatches aren’t uncommon • Lack of markings or damage can make identification impossible • It doesn’t automatically clear the suspect But then there’s the rest of the case: • Prosecutors say Robinson confessed in text messages • Alleged message: “I am. I’m sorry.” • They claim he hid the weapon after the shooting • And told his roommate to delete incriminating texts • DNA evidence reportedly ties him to the scene • Prosecutors are still pursuing the death penalty So now you have two competing realities: A bullet that can’t be tied to the gun… and a case built on confession, DNA, and behavior after the fact. The question isn’t simple anymore. If the bullet doesn’t match Tyler Robinson’s gun… what actually happened that day?

🚨 CHARLIE KIRK ASSASSINATION CASE IN TOTAL CHAOS — THE BULLET THAT KILLED HIM DOESN’T MATCH TYLER ROBINSON’S RIFLE Seven months after the shooting at a Utah Valley University campus event… the case just took a serious turn. In a new court filing, Tyler Robinson’s defense claims the ATF was unable to match the bullet recovered during Charlie Kirk’s autopsy to the rifle allegedly tied to Robinson. • The bullet that killed Kirk… not forensically linked to the gun • ATF report says there wasn’t enough evidence to make a match • Defense now asking to delay the preliminary hearing • Citing a “mountain” of material that could reshape the case This is where it gets complicated: • Legal experts say bullet mismatches aren’t uncommon • Lack of markings or damage can make identification impossible • It doesn’t automatically clear the suspect But then there’s the rest of the case: • Prosecutors say Robinson confessed in text messages • Alleged message: “I am. I’m sorry.” • They claim he hid the weapon after the shooting • And told his roommate to delete incriminating texts • DNA evidence reportedly ties him to the scene • Prosecutors are still pursuing the death penalty So now you have two competing realities: A bullet that can’t be tied to the gun… and a case built on confession, DNA, and behavior after the fact. The question isn’t simple anymore. If the bullet doesn’t match Tyler Robinson’s gun… what actually happened that day?

HustleBitch

23,204 views • 3 months ago