Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Interesting throwback resurfacing amid the Tyler Robinson preliminary hearing. In this early KSL interview, Kristen Schwerman Tyler Robinson’s neighbor and longtime school custodian who knew him and his brothers described him as a quiet, smart, mellow kid who “never caused any problems.” She expressed being genuinely shocked by the...

TheMainFocus's profile picture

WeThePeople

3,656 subscribers

54,844 views • 2 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Science & TechnologyNews & PoliticsEducation
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Candace is so cooked Video:They identified this guy because of his underwear in a separate case. Candace saying in the Tyler Robinson case that we don't have clear footage of Tyler Robinson. And the reason why the investigator thought it was Tyler Robinson was because he had the same clothes. Like it was unprecedented or something. Investigators routinely use clothing as 1 tool to identify, track, or link a possible suspect but it is almost never treated as unique identification by itself. Couple it with fingerprints or DNA and you got a case. Now add a confession And we already know. Tyler confessed.
0:00

Candace is so cooked Video:They identified this guy because of his underwear in a separate case. Candace saying in the Tyler Robinson case that we don't have clear footage of Tyler Robinson. And the reason why the investigator thought it was Tyler Robinson was because he had the same clothes. Like it was unprecedented or something. Investigators routinely use clothing as 1 tool to identify, track, or link a possible suspect but it is almost never treated as unique identification by itself. Couple it with fingerprints or DNA and you got a case. Now add a confession And we already know. Tyler confessed.

White 🤍 Queen

21,071 views • 12 days ago

🚨 NEW RING CAMERA FOOTAGE played in Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing today. Prosecutors claim it shows him pulling up in his Challenger in the middle of the night, getting out, then returning and leaving within just a few hours. Only problem? The footage is so grainy you can’t clearly make out if it’s even Tyler — or if it’s even his car. If this is the quality of evidence they’re using to tie him to the scene, the case just got a lot weaker. The timeline keeps falling apart under scrutiny. C: Candace Owens
1:08

🚨 NEW RING CAMERA FOOTAGE played in Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing today. Prosecutors claim it shows him pulling up in his Challenger in the middle of the night, getting out, then returning and leaving within just a few hours. Only problem? The footage is so grainy you can’t clearly make out if it’s even Tyler — or if it’s even his car. If this is the quality of evidence they’re using to tie him to the scene, the case just got a lot weaker. The timeline keeps falling apart under scrutiny. C: Candace Owens

Project Constitution

709,792 views • 2 months ago

‼️Candace Owens Lays Out the Fed NARRATIVE vs. What ACTUALLY Happened in the Tyler Robinson Case🧐 In her first episode back, Candace Owens broke down the official story we were fed about Tyler Robinson versus what the evidence and timeline actually show. According to the feds and their surrogates, Tyler Robinson was turned in by his own parents, confessed to them, his roommate Lance Twiggs, and on Discord. They claimed it was a politically motivated trans-related attack, that clear footage existed of him taking the shot, and that his DNA was all over the gun. Case closed. Candace laid out a very different picture. She stated that Tyler’s parents did not turn him in — that was a lie pushed from the beginning. Instead, a family friend and former undercover detective named Mike Mitchell pressured Tyler to turn himself in to avoid a violent raid on his home. She also maintained that Tyler was not political, that the gun recovered was never fired that day, and that Lance Twiggs is likely a federal asset who helped frame Tyler. She further pointed out that multiple young men matching Tyler’s description were on or around campus that day — what she called the “maroon boys” — and that Tyler Robinson himself never actually stepped foot on the UVU campus on September 10th. Two completely different stories. Only one can be true. FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT and watch her full episode linked below.👇
7:07

‼️Candace Owens Lays Out the Fed NARRATIVE vs. What ACTUALLY Happened in the Tyler Robinson Case🧐 In her first episode back, Candace Owens broke down the official story we were fed about Tyler Robinson versus what the evidence and timeline actually show. According to the feds and their surrogates, Tyler Robinson was turned in by his own parents, confessed to them, his roommate Lance Twiggs, and on Discord. They claimed it was a politically motivated trans-related attack, that clear footage existed of him taking the shot, and that his DNA was all over the gun. Case closed. Candace laid out a very different picture. She stated that Tyler’s parents did not turn him in — that was a lie pushed from the beginning. Instead, a family friend and former undercover detective named Mike Mitchell pressured Tyler to turn himself in to avoid a violent raid on his home. She also maintained that Tyler was not political, that the gun recovered was never fired that day, and that Lance Twiggs is likely a federal asset who helped frame Tyler. She further pointed out that multiple young men matching Tyler’s description were on or around campus that day — what she called the “maroon boys” — and that Tyler Robinson himself never actually stepped foot on the UVU campus on September 10th. Two completely different stories. Only one can be true. FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT and watch her full episode linked below.👇

Project Constitution

11,510 views • 1 month ago

🔥👀 LANCE TWIGGS VIDEO TESTIMONY IS PLAYED in the Provo, Utah courtroom for the world to see after attempts by the Tyler Robinson defense to prevent it. “ HE HAD SAID HE WAS PLANNING ON GOING HUNTING WITH HIS FAMILY & WANTED TO ENGRAVE MESSAGES ON BULLETS” - Twiggs Twiggs is shown a note and explains finding it under his computer keyboard. He then took a picture of it. He then asks him about the discord messages. Robinson played D&D. He was asking for a tool to do this a month before at most. Says they met in 2023. He first met his as a new roommate. Says they BEGAN DATING months after they moved in. Tyler Robinson spent the night of the 9th & 10th and left early because Tyler claimed he had a LONG RIDE to work. Says Tyler did not message him all day until 11pm on the 10th This is the video deposition regarding the assassination of Charlie Kirk by alleged assassin Tyler Robinson Twiggs seems to confirm he engraved the bullets. 👀Jack Posobiec
8:14

🔥👀 LANCE TWIGGS VIDEO TESTIMONY IS PLAYED in the Provo, Utah courtroom for the world to see after attempts by the Tyler Robinson defense to prevent it. “ HE HAD SAID HE WAS PLANNING ON GOING HUNTING WITH HIS FAMILY & WANTED TO ENGRAVE MESSAGES ON BULLETS” - Twiggs Twiggs is shown a note and explains finding it under his computer keyboard. He then took a picture of it. He then asks him about the discord messages. Robinson played D&D. He was asking for a tool to do this a month before at most. Says they met in 2023. He first met his as a new roommate. Says they BEGAN DATING months after they moved in. Tyler Robinson spent the night of the 9th & 10th and left early because Tyler claimed he had a LONG RIDE to work. Says Tyler did not message him all day until 11pm on the 10th This is the video deposition regarding the assassination of Charlie Kirk by alleged assassin Tyler Robinson Twiggs seems to confirm he engraved the bullets. 👀Jack Posobiec

Johnny St.Pete

20,756 views • 2 months ago

UPDATE: Tyler Robinson Judge ruled that Tyler Robinson will stand trial in Charlie Kirk's murder, where he could face the death penalty. Robinson already declined to testify at the preliminary hearing, and his lawyers have not indicated he will take the stand at trial. Putting him on the stand in a case with alleged written notes, texts, DNA, video, and other evidence would expose him to cross-examination, so his defense team likely advised against it. At this point, as far as I can tell, the trial will be televised to the public.
0:22

UPDATE: Tyler Robinson Judge ruled that Tyler Robinson will stand trial in Charlie Kirk's murder, where he could face the death penalty. Robinson already declined to testify at the preliminary hearing, and his lawyers have not indicated he will take the stand at trial. Putting him on the stand in a case with alleged written notes, texts, DNA, video, and other evidence would expose him to cross-examination, so his defense team likely advised against it. At this point, as far as I can tell, the trial will be televised to the public.

MJTruthUltra

29,356 views • 9 days ago

🚨 THOUGHT EXPERIMENT: What if Tyler and Lance’s Roles Were ACTUALLY Reversed? What if Tyler Robinson is the one who turned someone in, not Lance? Looking at these screenshots that were released, there’s some very sloppy editing going on. Multiple photos show heavy blurring on hands, floors, trim, and clothing — almost like someone was trying to hide the background or who was actually in the room. Even more interesting: the trim, flooring, and wall colors in some of these “Lance” photos match the exact interrogation room where Tyler was being questioned. And in one of the images, you can clearly see what looks like Tyler’s shoe that they tried (and failed) to blur out. It’s starting to look like these photos were taken in the same room, with Tyler being the one showing the messages. The “blurry hand” and photoshopped background in several shots only make it more suspicious. What if the narrative we’ve been fed is backwards? What if Tyler Robinson is the one who flipped… and they’ve been editing the evidence to make it look like it was Lance?
2:46

🚨 THOUGHT EXPERIMENT: What if Tyler and Lance’s Roles Were ACTUALLY Reversed? What if Tyler Robinson is the one who turned someone in, not Lance? Looking at these screenshots that were released, there’s some very sloppy editing going on. Multiple photos show heavy blurring on hands, floors, trim, and clothing — almost like someone was trying to hide the background or who was actually in the room. Even more interesting: the trim, flooring, and wall colors in some of these “Lance” photos match the exact interrogation room where Tyler was being questioned. And in one of the images, you can clearly see what looks like Tyler’s shoe that they tried (and failed) to blur out. It’s starting to look like these photos were taken in the same room, with Tyler being the one showing the messages. The “blurry hand” and photoshopped background in several shots only make it more suspicious. What if the narrative we’ve been fed is backwards? What if Tyler Robinson is the one who flipped… and they’ve been editing the evidence to make it look like it was Lance?

Project Constitution

54,676 views • 1 month ago

🚨 BOMBSHELL: Tyler Robinson's FAMILY Speaks Out—Say's Only 2% Of What YOU Are Hearing In The Mainstream Media Is TRUE😳 The establishment media narrative surrounding Tyler Robinson is completely unravelling. Brandi and Billie, hosts of the Brandi and Billie ShowZ, just dropped massive new information after speaking directly with a member of Tyler Robinson’s family inside the courtroom—and what they revealed changes everything. Here are the critical takeaways from their courtroom discussion: When asked why the family hasn't spoken out to independent journalists to clear the air, the family member stated that it doesn't matter who they talk to because the media will misconstrue it. She then dropped this bombshell: Only 2% of what the public is hearing about Tyler is true. The mainstream media has relentlessly pushed the story that Tyler’s own family (specifically his father) turned him in. But when Brandi and Billie asked the family member point-blank if Tyler was capable of carrying out this assassination, her answer was an immediate, definitive "NO." As Brandi pointed out, if the family truly believed he was a lone-wolf assassin and actively turned him in to the authorities, they would not be sitting in a courtroom telling independent podcasters that he is completely incapable of the crime and that the media is lying about him. The narrative of the "guilty family turning in their radicalized son" appears to be a total fabrication. Even the UVU eyewitness sitting next to them in the courtroom—who initially argued Tyler was the shooter—eventually admitted after looking at the photos that the bone structure and chin of the man in the stairwell do not match the real-life photos of Tyler Robinson. If Tyler didn't pull the trigger, and his family knows he isn't capable of it... who is the man in the stairwell photos? And why is the media working so hard to pin this entirely on Tyler? The setup is becoming obvious. Tyler may have been involved in some capacity, but he did not act alone, and he did not pull that trigger. 🚩🇺🇸 FOLLOW brandiandbillieshow and watch their FULL episoe linked below. 👇
7:47

🚨 BOMBSHELL: Tyler Robinson's FAMILY Speaks Out—Say's Only 2% Of What YOU Are Hearing In The Mainstream Media Is TRUE😳 The establishment media narrative surrounding Tyler Robinson is completely unravelling. Brandi and Billie, hosts of the Brandi and Billie ShowZ, just dropped massive new information after speaking directly with a member of Tyler Robinson’s family inside the courtroom—and what they revealed changes everything. Here are the critical takeaways from their courtroom discussion: When asked why the family hasn't spoken out to independent journalists to clear the air, the family member stated that it doesn't matter who they talk to because the media will misconstrue it. She then dropped this bombshell: Only 2% of what the public is hearing about Tyler is true. The mainstream media has relentlessly pushed the story that Tyler’s own family (specifically his father) turned him in. But when Brandi and Billie asked the family member point-blank if Tyler was capable of carrying out this assassination, her answer was an immediate, definitive "NO." As Brandi pointed out, if the family truly believed he was a lone-wolf assassin and actively turned him in to the authorities, they would not be sitting in a courtroom telling independent podcasters that he is completely incapable of the crime and that the media is lying about him. The narrative of the "guilty family turning in their radicalized son" appears to be a total fabrication. Even the UVU eyewitness sitting next to them in the courtroom—who initially argued Tyler was the shooter—eventually admitted after looking at the photos that the bone structure and chin of the man in the stairwell do not match the real-life photos of Tyler Robinson. If Tyler didn't pull the trigger, and his family knows he isn't capable of it... who is the man in the stairwell photos? And why is the media working so hard to pin this entirely on Tyler? The setup is becoming obvious. Tyler may have been involved in some capacity, but he did not act alone, and he did not pull that trigger. 🚩🇺🇸 FOLLOW brandiandbillieshow and watch their FULL episoe linked below. 👇

Project Constitution

275,019 views • 5 months ago

‼️Candace Owens On The Shawn Ryan Podcast: "Tyler Robinson Is Total Patsy" — He Was Set Up By Lance Twiggs In the interview, Candace said she’s confident Tyler Robinson did not murder Charlie Kirk. At most, she believes he may have been an accessory — but she strongly suspects he was set up. She pointed directly at Tyler’s roommate and boyfriend, Lance Twiggs, calling him a likely federal asset. Candace noted that it’s “bonkers” the police never even questioned Lance, despite him being central to the official story they’re pushing. Her reasoning: If they were in a relationship, Lance would have had easy access to Tyler’s guns. It would have been simple for Lance to set Tyler up. She suggested Tyler may have been blackmailed, possibly through “weird stuff online” — the easiest way for the feds to control someone. This lines up with what many of us have been saying for months: Tyler Robinson doesn’t fit the profile of a lone gunman. The speed at which the “official story” was locked in, combined with the lack of scrutiny on Lance Twiggs, has always been one of the biggest red flags. If Lance Twiggs really is a federal asset who set Tyler up, then this wasn’t just a random act of violence — it was a coordinated operation. The more we learn, the clearer it becomes that the public is not being told the full story about what happened at UVU. FOLLOW Candace Owens and Shawn Ryan RT this. The truth is starting to come out.
1:09

‼️Candace Owens On The Shawn Ryan Podcast: "Tyler Robinson Is Total Patsy" — He Was Set Up By Lance Twiggs In the interview, Candace said she’s confident Tyler Robinson did not murder Charlie Kirk. At most, she believes he may have been an accessory — but she strongly suspects he was set up. She pointed directly at Tyler’s roommate and boyfriend, Lance Twiggs, calling him a likely federal asset. Candace noted that it’s “bonkers” the police never even questioned Lance, despite him being central to the official story they’re pushing. Her reasoning: If they were in a relationship, Lance would have had easy access to Tyler’s guns. It would have been simple for Lance to set Tyler up. She suggested Tyler may have been blackmailed, possibly through “weird stuff online” — the easiest way for the feds to control someone. This lines up with what many of us have been saying for months: Tyler Robinson doesn’t fit the profile of a lone gunman. The speed at which the “official story” was locked in, combined with the lack of scrutiny on Lance Twiggs, has always been one of the biggest red flags. If Lance Twiggs really is a federal asset who set Tyler up, then this wasn’t just a random act of violence — it was a coordinated operation. The more we learn, the clearer it becomes that the public is not being told the full story about what happened at UVU. FOLLOW Candace Owens and Shawn Ryan RT this. The truth is starting to come out.

Project Constitution

25,769 views • 2 months ago

This is an important point for those who say the surveillance footage doesn't look like Tyler Robinson. On the Discord chat, his own friends thought the surveillance images looked like him. Tyler acknowledged they looked like him by saying it was his "doppelgänger" getting him in trouble. They even joked about turning him in for the reward money. Eventually he confessed to the entire group that it was him: “Look at the photos from the surveillance footage. It was me.” “look at the pictures from the surveillance footage. it was me. … im serious” “Hey guys, I have bad news for you all. it was me at UVU yesterday. im sorry for all of this.” That's not to mention his own parents ID'd him from the surveillance footage, and Lance Twiggs is on video saying the stills taken from the footage looked like him, especially the last two images, which is when he was walking with a limp due to an object, reasonably inferred as a gun, stuffed down a pant leg. Another small detail people don't often remember, is that a previous co-worker told The Washington Post that Robinson would often walk with his fists locked. A strange quirk, but visible in the bottom photo.
0:41

This is an important point for those who say the surveillance footage doesn't look like Tyler Robinson. On the Discord chat, his own friends thought the surveillance images looked like him. Tyler acknowledged they looked like him by saying it was his "doppelgänger" getting him in trouble. They even joked about turning him in for the reward money. Eventually he confessed to the entire group that it was him: “Look at the photos from the surveillance footage. It was me.” “look at the pictures from the surveillance footage. it was me. … im serious” “Hey guys, I have bad news for you all. it was me at UVU yesterday. im sorry for all of this.” That's not to mention his own parents ID'd him from the surveillance footage, and Lance Twiggs is on video saying the stills taken from the footage looked like him, especially the last two images, which is when he was walking with a limp due to an object, reasonably inferred as a gun, stuffed down a pant leg. Another small detail people don't often remember, is that a previous co-worker told The Washington Post that Robinson would often walk with his fists locked. A strange quirk, but visible in the bottom photo.

Andrew Kolvet

434,862 views • 24 days ago

🚨The Case Against Tyler Robinson Is Collapsing in Plain Sight! The Tyler Robinson hearing is an absolute joke, and the record so far makes that painfully clear. The state’s key evidence, a “surveillance compilation” edited by the Utah Attorney General’s office, was rejected for alterations, and there is still no raw, uncut footage of the assassination. The officer on scene couldn’t even recover the shell casing from Robinson’s alleged rifle, and the DNA on the towel is 95% linked to Lance Twiggs, not Tyler Robinson. To make matters worse, the officer’s bodycam was conveniently turned off at the most critical moments. As it stands today, the state has zero solid evidence actually tying Tyler Robinson to the assassination of Charlie Kirk. 🇺🇸Lionel🇺🇸 joins me to break down how a case this weak ever made it into a courtroom.
14:24

🚨The Case Against Tyler Robinson Is Collapsing in Plain Sight! The Tyler Robinson hearing is an absolute joke, and the record so far makes that painfully clear. The state’s key evidence, a “surveillance compilation” edited by the Utah Attorney General’s office, was rejected for alterations, and there is still no raw, uncut footage of the assassination. The officer on scene couldn’t even recover the shell casing from Robinson’s alleged rifle, and the DNA on the towel is 95% linked to Lance Twiggs, not Tyler Robinson. To make matters worse, the officer’s bodycam was conveniently turned off at the most critical moments. As it stands today, the state has zero solid evidence actually tying Tyler Robinson to the assassination of Charlie Kirk. 🇺🇸Lionel🇺🇸 joins me to break down how a case this weak ever made it into a courtroom.

Ben Swann

309,222 views • 2 months ago

Tyler Robinson, the man who killed Charlie Kirk, was captured on UVU campus security footage well before the incident. According to the footage presented to the court, Tyler arrived on campus in his vehicle, then walked around scouting the area extensively. University officials also confirm they have clear facial images of him from the recordings. This directly contradicts earlier claims that Tyler never stepped foot on the UVU campus. Candace Owens repeatedly stated to her audience for months that Tyler Robinson never visited the campus and claimed high-level sources confirmed it. She lied.
1:00

Tyler Robinson, the man who killed Charlie Kirk, was captured on UVU campus security footage well before the incident. According to the footage presented to the court, Tyler arrived on campus in his vehicle, then walked around scouting the area extensively. University officials also confirm they have clear facial images of him from the recordings. This directly contradicts earlier claims that Tyler never stepped foot on the UVU campus. Candace Owens repeatedly stated to her audience for months that Tyler Robinson never visited the campus and claimed high-level sources confirmed it. She lied.

Ian Miles Cheong

30,611 views • 4 months ago

Yesterday, a number of journalists who attended the Tyler Robinson preliminary hearing reported that clear video evidence of Tyler taking the shot from the roof was presented. The video was not shown to the public because of the judge’s order (due to the clerical error of showing Tyler Robinson’s alleged confession note the day before). Immediately, other journalists who were also in attendance reported that the video did NOT show Tyler Robinson taking the shot, and that those journalists were lying, repeating “fed slop”. The reality is that both journalists are correct. The video (which was merely enhanced video of segments the public had already seen) showed the man *identified* as Tyler on the roof, in the prone position, taking the shot, and then fleeing. It did not show his face (I verified with a couple of people in respect of their posts). So on the one hand, you have journalists reporting that the video clearly showed the man *who had been previously identified as Tyler Robinson* taking the shot. And on the other hand, you have journalist saying the video did not show Tyler specifically (in terms of close-up on his face for facial recognition). This is the exact confusion and spin I specifically predicted would happen during my appearance on Megyn Kelly that morning. Had the public seen the video, there would have been no confusion in what was meant by the various reports. But the judge, in his order denying transparency to the judicial process, allowed for this confusion to occur and be weaponized to taint the entire judicial process. The judge, in his idiotic ruling to not display exhibits on the final day of the hearing, in an effort to split the judicial baby to please both parties, killed the judicial baby.
1:47

Yesterday, a number of journalists who attended the Tyler Robinson preliminary hearing reported that clear video evidence of Tyler taking the shot from the roof was presented. The video was not shown to the public because of the judge’s order (due to the clerical error of showing Tyler Robinson’s alleged confession note the day before). Immediately, other journalists who were also in attendance reported that the video did NOT show Tyler Robinson taking the shot, and that those journalists were lying, repeating “fed slop”. The reality is that both journalists are correct. The video (which was merely enhanced video of segments the public had already seen) showed the man *identified* as Tyler on the roof, in the prone position, taking the shot, and then fleeing. It did not show his face (I verified with a couple of people in respect of their posts). So on the one hand, you have journalists reporting that the video clearly showed the man *who had been previously identified as Tyler Robinson* taking the shot. And on the other hand, you have journalist saying the video did not show Tyler specifically (in terms of close-up on his face for facial recognition). This is the exact confusion and spin I specifically predicted would happen during my appearance on Megyn Kelly that morning. Had the public seen the video, there would have been no confusion in what was meant by the various reports. But the judge, in his order denying transparency to the judicial process, allowed for this confusion to occur and be weaponized to taint the entire judicial process. The judge, in his idiotic ruling to not display exhibits on the final day of the hearing, in an effort to split the judicial baby to please both parties, killed the judicial baby.

Viva Frei

148,579 views • 2 months ago

🚨BREAKING: Candace Owens's own footage — the clip she used to defend Tyler Robinson — shows recoil she claimed wasn't there, perfectly timed to the shot that killed Charlie Kirk. Thank you for solving the case, Candace. In ten months, you never produced a shred of evidence that Egyptian planes, the U.S. military, French Legionnaires, Israel, or TPUSA killed Charlie. This week, you produced footage of Tyler Robinson shooting Charlie Kirk — blurry, because it's a camera recording a screen, but real. No wonder the defense fought to keep this out of the preliminary hearing. You can see him recoil as you hear the gunshot. You can see him run across the roof holding the gun wrapped in a towel. You can see him holding it as he jumps off the roof and walks across the grass. You've said footage of him assembling the rifle on that roof "does not exist." Fine — then release the full seven minutes he's up there, unedited, and let the public see for themselves. And hopefully the court eventually releases a high-resolution version. We know it's Tyler Robinson because there's more corroborating evidence here than in most murder convictions: He confessed multiple times. His parents and his boyfriend identified him in the footage, and he identified himself in one of his own confessions. Then he turned himself in. His car, his gun, his DNA, and his phone's Google Maps data all place him at the scene. He described exactly how the murder weapon was hidden — wrapped in a towel in the bushes — in texts to his boyfriend, before that detail was ever public. The list goes on. In ten months, the defense hasn't challenged any of it. If the confessions were fake, that's exactly how they'd have gotten this case thrown out. Thank you, too, for the Dairy Queen photo from that evening — showing his face in the same white-logo Hurley hat he's seen wearing on campus, a few minutes from where Charlie was shot. Ten months spent defending Charlie's accused killer, and slandering his wife, his friends, and his organization while making millions lying about his murder — and you finally produced real evidence. Unfortunately for you, it shows Tyler Robinson shooting Charlie Kirk. Charlie told us himself, seconds before he was murdered. A student asked him how many transgender Americans have been shooters in the last decade. Charlie's answer: "Too many." But thanks for the footage, Candace.
4:44

🚨BREAKING: Candace Owens's own footage — the clip she used to defend Tyler Robinson — shows recoil she claimed wasn't there, perfectly timed to the shot that killed Charlie Kirk. Thank you for solving the case, Candace. In ten months, you never produced a shred of evidence that Egyptian planes, the U.S. military, French Legionnaires, Israel, or TPUSA killed Charlie. This week, you produced footage of Tyler Robinson shooting Charlie Kirk — blurry, because it's a camera recording a screen, but real. No wonder the defense fought to keep this out of the preliminary hearing. You can see him recoil as you hear the gunshot. You can see him run across the roof holding the gun wrapped in a towel. You can see him holding it as he jumps off the roof and walks across the grass. You've said footage of him assembling the rifle on that roof "does not exist." Fine — then release the full seven minutes he's up there, unedited, and let the public see for themselves. And hopefully the court eventually releases a high-resolution version. We know it's Tyler Robinson because there's more corroborating evidence here than in most murder convictions: He confessed multiple times. His parents and his boyfriend identified him in the footage, and he identified himself in one of his own confessions. Then he turned himself in. His car, his gun, his DNA, and his phone's Google Maps data all place him at the scene. He described exactly how the murder weapon was hidden — wrapped in a towel in the bushes — in texts to his boyfriend, before that detail was ever public. The list goes on. In ten months, the defense hasn't challenged any of it. If the confessions were fake, that's exactly how they'd have gotten this case thrown out. Thank you, too, for the Dairy Queen photo from that evening — showing his face in the same white-logo Hurley hat he's seen wearing on campus, a few minutes from where Charlie was shot. Ten months spent defending Charlie's accused killer, and slandering his wife, his friends, and his organization while making millions lying about his murder — and you finally produced real evidence. Unfortunately for you, it shows Tyler Robinson shooting Charlie Kirk. Charlie told us himself, seconds before he was murdered. A student asked him how many transgender Americans have been shooters in the last decade. Charlie's answer: "Too many." But thanks for the footage, Candace.

KanekoaTheGreat

1,169,562 views • 1 month ago

🚨 JUST NOW: The Tyler Robinson defense is PANICKING, objecting to the release of evidence involving transgender lover Lance Twiggs in the Kirk assassination hearing They even found a towel matching the DNA of BOTH Robinson and Twiggs on-scene 🤯 Justice for Charlie Kirk means NO MORE DELAYS and release it ALL. All evidence points to SHUT-AND-DRY CASE. The liars are sweating right now. "You can tell a lot by what the defense is concerned with by what they've been objecting to...this recorded statement from Lance Twiggs."
1:44

🚨 JUST NOW: The Tyler Robinson defense is PANICKING, objecting to the release of evidence involving transgender lover Lance Twiggs in the Kirk assassination hearing They even found a towel matching the DNA of BOTH Robinson and Twiggs on-scene 🤯 Justice for Charlie Kirk means NO MORE DELAYS and release it ALL. All evidence points to SHUT-AND-DRY CASE. The liars are sweating right now. "You can tell a lot by what the defense is concerned with by what they've been objecting to...this recorded statement from Lance Twiggs."

Eric Daugherty

106,809 views • 2 months ago

Can someone, anyone, explain the major discrepancies in Lance Twiggs’s testimony that I’m hearing? 1. Lance testified that Tyler did not text him directly AT ALL on September 10th. He testified that the only message that came through that day was via an automated Discord message from Tyler to a D&D server group chat that they were both a part of at 11 pm. Why then are we shown screenshots of a personal text message thread from September 10th where there are texts from Tyler to Lance starting at 4:33 pm?? There’s also a direct text supposedly from Tyler at 11 pm as well — is that what’s being referred to as the “automated” message (although it’s not remotely from Discord)?? Tyler then supposedly sends a flurry of texts detailing his crime to Lance all before midnight. Why did Lance not account for any of these messages when he said Tyler “did not text him directly” all day?? 2. How would Lance know if the one 11 pm text message was “automated” when iMessage doesn’t differentiate between messages that are scheduled before or sent in the moment? 3. Prosecutor Ryan McBride, in his interview of Lance, while reading the messages exchanged.. said clear as day that the messages spanned from September 10th to September 12th. Lance agrees with this. Seconds later, he changes the story and says the messages were from September 10th to the evening of September 11th. Why? Agent Brian Davis, while on the stand, then testified to the messages ending September 11th, but the attorney who questioned him also sounded majorly confused based on what she was reading. She kept saying: “Does September 12th.. make more sense? Does it make sense?” Why did she initially ALSO say September 12th but then backtrack?? 4. Lance says in his testimony that he picked the note up and then never saw it again. Did he not burn it? How could he not pick it up again if he did that. Why was there no testimony to him burning it?
2:19

Can someone, anyone, explain the major discrepancies in Lance Twiggs’s testimony that I’m hearing? 1. Lance testified that Tyler did not text him directly AT ALL on September 10th. He testified that the only message that came through that day was via an automated Discord message from Tyler to a D&D server group chat that they were both a part of at 11 pm. Why then are we shown screenshots of a personal text message thread from September 10th where there are texts from Tyler to Lance starting at 4:33 pm?? There’s also a direct text supposedly from Tyler at 11 pm as well — is that what’s being referred to as the “automated” message (although it’s not remotely from Discord)?? Tyler then supposedly sends a flurry of texts detailing his crime to Lance all before midnight. Why did Lance not account for any of these messages when he said Tyler “did not text him directly” all day?? 2. How would Lance know if the one 11 pm text message was “automated” when iMessage doesn’t differentiate between messages that are scheduled before or sent in the moment? 3. Prosecutor Ryan McBride, in his interview of Lance, while reading the messages exchanged.. said clear as day that the messages spanned from September 10th to September 12th. Lance agrees with this. Seconds later, he changes the story and says the messages were from September 10th to the evening of September 11th. Why? Agent Brian Davis, while on the stand, then testified to the messages ending September 11th, but the attorney who questioned him also sounded majorly confused based on what she was reading. She kept saying: “Does September 12th.. make more sense? Does it make sense?” Why did she initially ALSO say September 12th but then backtrack?? 4. Lance says in his testimony that he picked the note up and then never saw it again. Did he not burn it? How could he not pick it up again if he did that. Why was there no testimony to him burning it?

Brave Report

21,523 views • 2 months ago

This one is crazy. If ever there was a case that you could point to as police brutality, this one is it. It’s early morning in Paulding County, Georgia. 29-year-old Tyler Canaris is doing what millions of us do every day—he’s waiting for his ride to work. Tyler is a landscaper, minding his own business, when Deputy Michael McMaster pulls up. In the blink of an eye Tyler Canaris was body-slammed so hard by Paulding County Deputy Michael McMaster that his skull fractured. Tyler was an innocent man waiting for his ride to work. He didn't have a weapon. He wasn't committing a crime. After the slam you can hear Tyler is in pain. Instead of offering help, McMaster mocked him and told him to shut up and act like a man. One of the most disturbing parts of this case is how long it took for consequences to arrive. For nearly a year, the Paulding County Sheriff’s Office did nothing. McMaster remained on the force, and Tyler was the one facing criminal charges for "obstruction." ​It wasn't until the GBI stepped in—that McMaster was finally fired. But even then, the department claimed he was fired for "policy violations" unrelated to the GBI’s use-of-force investigation. No Charges to this day, Michael McMaster has not been criminally charged for the injuries he inflicted on Tyler. Despite a GBI investigation, no indictment has been handed down. While Tyler lives with metal plates in his body and $75,000 in debt, the man who put him there remains a free man. Tyler filed a federal civil rights lawsuit (Section 1983) seeking accountability. However, the path to justice hit a major wall: ​Parts of the case faced significant hurdles in District Court, as his case was dismissed by the district court with prejudice. ​ In early 2026, the case moved to the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals. Tyler’s legal team is fighting to overturn rulings that have stalled his pursuit of damages. As of right now, the court is still processing briefs, meaning Tyler is years away from a potential settlement or trial. What is your take on this case, I look forward to reading your comments below.
6:31

This one is crazy. If ever there was a case that you could point to as police brutality, this one is it. It’s early morning in Paulding County, Georgia. 29-year-old Tyler Canaris is doing what millions of us do every day—he’s waiting for his ride to work. Tyler is a landscaper, minding his own business, when Deputy Michael McMaster pulls up. In the blink of an eye Tyler Canaris was body-slammed so hard by Paulding County Deputy Michael McMaster that his skull fractured. Tyler was an innocent man waiting for his ride to work. He didn't have a weapon. He wasn't committing a crime. After the slam you can hear Tyler is in pain. Instead of offering help, McMaster mocked him and told him to shut up and act like a man. One of the most disturbing parts of this case is how long it took for consequences to arrive. For nearly a year, the Paulding County Sheriff’s Office did nothing. McMaster remained on the force, and Tyler was the one facing criminal charges for "obstruction." ​It wasn't until the GBI stepped in—that McMaster was finally fired. But even then, the department claimed he was fired for "policy violations" unrelated to the GBI’s use-of-force investigation. No Charges to this day, Michael McMaster has not been criminally charged for the injuries he inflicted on Tyler. Despite a GBI investigation, no indictment has been handed down. While Tyler lives with metal plates in his body and $75,000 in debt, the man who put him there remains a free man. Tyler filed a federal civil rights lawsuit (Section 1983) seeking accountability. However, the path to justice hit a major wall: ​Parts of the case faced significant hurdles in District Court, as his case was dismissed by the district court with prejudice. ​ In early 2026, the case moved to the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals. Tyler’s legal team is fighting to overturn rulings that have stalled his pursuit of damages. As of right now, the court is still processing briefs, meaning Tyler is years away from a potential settlement or trial. What is your take on this case, I look forward to reading your comments below.

Giggling Ganon

54,536 views • 4 months ago

🚨 If Erika Kirk ever cared about Charlie Kirk, she would be publicly sounding the alarm. Last night, Candace Owens released unedited footage that is substantially better quality than the footage provided by authorities in the case against Tyler Robinson. This exclusive, high-quality footage, obtained from an anonymous government source, should have vindicated the official narrative against Tyler Robinson. However, it failed to do so. The person in the footage bears no resemblance to Tyler Robinson. Baron Coleman and many others are more convinced than ever that Tyler Robinson is being framed for the assassination of Charlie Kirk. The man in the footage is not skinny; he appears far more muscular and robust than Tyler Robinson. The man by all metrics appears to be left-handed. He even put an earpiece in his left ear. This isn't 2005; who wears an earpiece in public?! You can clearly see that the man is wearing white leggings or thigh-high white socks under his shorts. Authorities never mentioned leggings or thigh-high socks. Furthermore, it’s quite possible that a ponytail could be hiding underneath his hat, considering the way he’s wearing it. Why is this of interest? Lance Twiggs, Tyler’s roommate whose less degraded DNA was found on every piece of evidence against Tyler Robinson, has a ponytail. Why didn’t our government release this high-quality footage, which is obviously available? Why does it seem that authorities deliberately degraded the footage presented in court? Why is this evidence coming from not only a podcaster but also a pregnant mother of four who works out of her basement in Nashville, Tennessee? Why are TPUSA and Erika Kirk completely silent?! Why aren't Erika Kirk, Andrew Kolvet, and Tyler Bowyer on Fox News asking what the hell is going on here?! Everyone should be demanding answers for who actually killed Charlie Kirk, but Erika Kirk and every individual at TPUSA should be at the forefront of demanding answers for this blatant and evident failure of our law enforcement institutions.
2:11

🚨 If Erika Kirk ever cared about Charlie Kirk, she would be publicly sounding the alarm. Last night, Candace Owens released unedited footage that is substantially better quality than the footage provided by authorities in the case against Tyler Robinson. This exclusive, high-quality footage, obtained from an anonymous government source, should have vindicated the official narrative against Tyler Robinson. However, it failed to do so. The person in the footage bears no resemblance to Tyler Robinson. Baron Coleman and many others are more convinced than ever that Tyler Robinson is being framed for the assassination of Charlie Kirk. The man in the footage is not skinny; he appears far more muscular and robust than Tyler Robinson. The man by all metrics appears to be left-handed. He even put an earpiece in his left ear. This isn't 2005; who wears an earpiece in public?! You can clearly see that the man is wearing white leggings or thigh-high white socks under his shorts. Authorities never mentioned leggings or thigh-high socks. Furthermore, it’s quite possible that a ponytail could be hiding underneath his hat, considering the way he’s wearing it. Why is this of interest? Lance Twiggs, Tyler’s roommate whose less degraded DNA was found on every piece of evidence against Tyler Robinson, has a ponytail. Why didn’t our government release this high-quality footage, which is obviously available? Why does it seem that authorities deliberately degraded the footage presented in court? Why is this evidence coming from not only a podcaster but also a pregnant mother of four who works out of her basement in Nashville, Tennessee? Why are TPUSA and Erika Kirk completely silent?! Why aren't Erika Kirk, Andrew Kolvet, and Tyler Bowyer on Fox News asking what the hell is going on here?! Everyone should be demanding answers for who actually killed Charlie Kirk, but Erika Kirk and every individual at TPUSA should be at the forefront of demanding answers for this blatant and evident failure of our law enforcement institutions.

Travis

105,243 views • 1 month ago

‼️DEBUNKED: The Parents Did NOT Turn Tyler Robinson In — Candace Fully DEBUNKS That Story As A Great Big LIE🤥 Candace just dismantled one of the most repeated early narratives in the Tyler Robinson case: that his own parents recognized him and turned him in. That claim has never been proven. What the evidence actually shows is that Mike Mitchell — the family friend, former Boy Scout leader, ex-cop who worked sex crimes, and Mormon minister — was the one who thought he recognized Tyler from the stairwell photo. Mitchell then contacted the parents and got the ball rolling. Trump himself confirmed this exact sequence on Fox & Friends, describing a person of faith with law enforcement background who went to the father. No signed statement from Matt or Amber Robinson has ever been produced in court, and the prosecution never put them on the stand at the preliminary hearing to say their son was guilty. They keep pushing a false story because the truth is less convenient. The public deserves the real version of how this case started. FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT and watch her FULL episode linked below.👇
4:21

‼️DEBUNKED: The Parents Did NOT Turn Tyler Robinson In — Candace Fully DEBUNKS That Story As A Great Big LIE🤥 Candace just dismantled one of the most repeated early narratives in the Tyler Robinson case: that his own parents recognized him and turned him in. That claim has never been proven. What the evidence actually shows is that Mike Mitchell — the family friend, former Boy Scout leader, ex-cop who worked sex crimes, and Mormon minister — was the one who thought he recognized Tyler from the stairwell photo. Mitchell then contacted the parents and got the ball rolling. Trump himself confirmed this exact sequence on Fox & Friends, describing a person of faith with law enforcement background who went to the father. No signed statement from Matt or Amber Robinson has ever been produced in court, and the prosecution never put them on the stand at the preliminary hearing to say their son was guilty. They keep pushing a false story because the truth is less convenient. The public deserves the real version of how this case started. FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT and watch her FULL episode linked below.👇

Project Constitution

27,679 views • 22 days ago