Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Interview PART 21, TRANSLATED Dr. Araghchi: Iran Rejected the U.S.'s "Surrender Plan" "The first proposal they gave us was the well-known 15-point SURRENDER plan." Dr. Araghchi said Iran rejected it and submitted its own 10-point framework instead. "If they accepted our ten points as the BASIS for negotiations, we... show more

Ryan Rozbiani

202,928 subscribers

12,706 views • 1 month ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

🚨NOW: President Trump has rejected Iran's 10-point ceasefire plan and threw it in the GARBAGE 🗑️ Just yesterday Trump said “we received 10 point proposal from Iran, and believe it is a workable basis on which to negotiate.” Everything goes to shit again…..

🚨NOW: President Trump has rejected Iran's 10-point ceasefire plan and threw it in the GARBAGE 🗑️ Just yesterday Trump said “we received 10 point proposal from Iran, and believe it is a workable basis on which to negotiate.” Everything goes to shit again…..

Ash Crypto

280,147 views • 4 months ago

🚨🇺🇸🇮🇷🇮🇱🇵🇰 Here's where things stand tonight. The war is paused... The U.S., Iran, and Israel have agreed to a two-week ceasefire. All military operations halted. Iran has reopened the Strait of Hormuz with passage coordinated through its armed forces. First direct U.S.-Iran negotiations begin Friday in Islamabad using Iran's 10-point proposal as the framework. That framework includes sanctions relief, non-aggression guarantees, acceptance of enrichment, formal Iranian oversight of Hormuz, and compensation. The critical nuance: these aren't agreed terms. They're the basis for negotiation. But the fact that Washington accepted Iran's proposal as the starting document rather than insisting on its own 15-point plan is a significant concession in itself. Iran got the negotiations it wanted on terms it proposed. The U.S. got Hormuz reopened and a pause it badly needed. Israel agreed to stop bombing, something Netanyahu said he would never do without total Iranian capitulation. Two weeks. That's how long both sides have to turn a pause into a permanent peace. If they fail, everything resumes and the next phase will be worse than anything we've seen. Source: WSJ / NYT / Axios

🚨🇺🇸🇮🇷🇮🇱🇵🇰 Here's where things stand tonight. The war is paused... The U.S., Iran, and Israel have agreed to a two-week ceasefire. All military operations halted. Iran has reopened the Strait of Hormuz with passage coordinated through its armed forces. First direct U.S.-Iran negotiations begin Friday in Islamabad using Iran's 10-point proposal as the framework. That framework includes sanctions relief, non-aggression guarantees, acceptance of enrichment, formal Iranian oversight of Hormuz, and compensation. The critical nuance: these aren't agreed terms. They're the basis for negotiation. But the fact that Washington accepted Iran's proposal as the starting document rather than insisting on its own 15-point plan is a significant concession in itself. Iran got the negotiations it wanted on terms it proposed. The U.S. got Hormuz reopened and a pause it badly needed. Israel agreed to stop bombing, something Netanyahu said he would never do without total Iranian capitulation. Two weeks. That's how long both sides have to turn a pause into a permanent peace. If they fail, everything resumes and the next phase will be worse than anything we've seen. Source: WSJ / NYT / Axios

Mario Nawfal

950,819 views • 4 months ago

Iran FM: U.S. Demanded Unconditional Surrender, Then Begged For Negotiations Foreign Minister Dr. Abbas Araghchi: "That same enemy who, on the first day of the war, tweeted 'UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER.' Twenty days later, that same enemy BEGGED us for Negotiations." Araghchi said he has personally heard officials tell him Iran "won the war and won the diplomacy," and credited the outcome to the SACRIFICE of the Iranian people, including medical staff on the front lines.

Iran FM: U.S. Demanded Unconditional Surrender, Then Begged For Negotiations Foreign Minister Dr. Abbas Araghchi: "That same enemy who, on the first day of the war, tweeted 'UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER.' Twenty days later, that same enemy BEGGED us for Negotiations." Araghchi said he has personally heard officials tell him Iran "won the war and won the diplomacy," and credited the outcome to the SACRIFICE of the Iranian people, including medical staff on the front lines.

Ryan Rozbiani

21,025 views • 10 days ago

Q: "Iran has rejected the U.S.'s 15-point plan to end the war. What's the White House's response?" WH Press Sec: "Talks continue. They are productive, as the President said on Monday, and they continue to be."

Q: "Iran has rejected the U.S.'s 15-point plan to end the war. What's the White House's response?" WH Press Sec: "Talks continue. They are productive, as the President said on Monday, and they continue to be."

Breaking911

27,297 views • 4 months ago

Iranian scholar Prof. Seyed Mohammad Marandi says that Iran had proposed a 10-point plan which, he claims, was accepted by the Trump administration as a framework for negotiations. He describes this as a “major setback” for the US. He further questions why, if Iran was supposedly weak militarily, the plan was accepted, suggesting it reflected pressure on Washington. He also explains why, in his view, Iran did not fully leverage its position during negotiations. #IndiaTodayGlobal | Geeta Mohan گیتا موہن गीता मोहन | Seyed Mohammad Marandi

Iranian scholar Prof. Seyed Mohammad Marandi says that Iran had proposed a 10-point plan which, he claims, was accepted by the Trump administration as a framework for negotiations. He describes this as a “major setback” for the US. He further questions why, if Iran was supposedly weak militarily, the plan was accepted, suggesting it reflected pressure on Washington. He also explains why, in his view, Iran did not fully leverage its position during negotiations. #IndiaTodayGlobal | Geeta Mohan گیتا موہن गीता मोहन | Seyed Mohammad Marandi

IndiaToday

17,992 views • 3 months ago

In an interview for #AlMayadeen, Professor Mohammad Marandi said that he believes #Oman is probably not sending messages back and forth, noting that one mediator is enough. He explained that Oman has connections with countries in the region and the #US, adding that it can "perhaps play a role in making sure that Iran's adversaries understand clearly what Iran's position is." Professor Mohammad Marandi said Iran is seeking firm recognition from the United States of its “red lines,” stressing that Tehran remains focused on its ten-point proposal as the basis for talks. He added that meaningful negotiations can only proceed in a conducive and stable environment. Elaborating on the second point, Marandi highlighted how the US has violated the ceasefire agreement. He said, "Because if the ceasefire is not implemented, if the Americans are not abiding by their obligations in the ceasefire, then what's the point of having further negotiations?" #Iran #IranWar #WestAsia Seyed Mohammad Marandi

In an interview for #AlMayadeen, Professor Mohammad Marandi said that he believes #Oman is probably not sending messages back and forth, noting that one mediator is enough. He explained that Oman has connections with countries in the region and the #US, adding that it can "perhaps play a role in making sure that Iran's adversaries understand clearly what Iran's position is." Professor Mohammad Marandi said Iran is seeking firm recognition from the United States of its “red lines,” stressing that Tehran remains focused on its ten-point proposal as the basis for talks. He added that meaningful negotiations can only proceed in a conducive and stable environment. Elaborating on the second point, Marandi highlighted how the US has violated the ceasefire agreement. He said, "Because if the ceasefire is not implemented, if the Americans are not abiding by their obligations in the ceasefire, then what's the point of having further negotiations?" #Iran #IranWar #WestAsia Seyed Mohammad Marandi

Al Mayadeen English

13,694 views • 3 months ago

Jennings: I don’t agree that he has made empty threats Phillip: What do you call the threat to end their civilization, only to accept a ten point plan that was put on the table yesterday as the basis for negotiations? Jennings: You’re misreporting it Phillip: The president retweeted the Iranian foreign minister's statement, which said explicitly that they are using the ten point plan as a basis of negotiation

Jennings: I don’t agree that he has made empty threats Phillip: What do you call the threat to end their civilization, only to accept a ten point plan that was put on the table yesterday as the basis for negotiations? Jennings: You’re misreporting it Phillip: The president retweeted the Iranian foreign minister's statement, which said explicitly that they are using the ten point plan as a basis of negotiation

Acyn

180,323 views • 4 months ago

💢 Iran’s FM: “We are not at that point yet” to end the war, says this time must lead to a permanent end ▪️ Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said Tehran will not consider another temporary ceasefire, arguing that previous pauses in fighting only allowed Israel and the US to restart war. Asked what conditions could end the war, Araghchi said: “We are not at that point yet. Obviously this time is different from the previous time.” ▪️ He said Iran previously agreed to halt fighting once attacks stopped. “When the aggression was stopped, we stopped too. But it didn’t bring about peace.” ▪️ Now, he said, the same pattern is repeating. “Now they want to ask for a ceasefire again. Well this doesn’t work like this. There should be a permanent end of the war.” ▪️ Until that happens, he said Iran will continue fighting. “Unless we get to that I think we need to continue fighting for the sake of our people and our security.” ▪️ Asked if Iran would accept a ceasefire to restart negotiations, Araghchi said the U.S. and Israel must first account for starting the war. “They have to explain why they started this aggression before we come to the point to even consider a ceasefire.” ▪️ “It is not fair that if they only stop the aggression and ask us to stop too… this time is different,” he said.

💢 Iran’s FM: “We are not at that point yet” to end the war, says this time must lead to a permanent end ▪️ Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said Tehran will not consider another temporary ceasefire, arguing that previous pauses in fighting only allowed Israel and the US to restart war. Asked what conditions could end the war, Araghchi said: “We are not at that point yet. Obviously this time is different from the previous time.” ▪️ He said Iran previously agreed to halt fighting once attacks stopped. “When the aggression was stopped, we stopped too. But it didn’t bring about peace.” ▪️ Now, he said, the same pattern is repeating. “Now they want to ask for a ceasefire again. Well this doesn’t work like this. There should be a permanent end of the war.” ▪️ Until that happens, he said Iran will continue fighting. “Unless we get to that I think we need to continue fighting for the sake of our people and our security.” ▪️ Asked if Iran would accept a ceasefire to restart negotiations, Araghchi said the U.S. and Israel must first account for starting the war. “They have to explain why they started this aggression before we come to the point to even consider a ceasefire.” ▪️ “It is not fair that if they only stop the aggression and ask us to stop too… this time is different,” he said.

Drop Site

223,383 views • 5 months ago

Interview PART 5, TRANSLATED Iran's FM: Iran Forced The U.S. To Sign A NON AGGRESSION Commitment Dr. Abbas Araghchi said Netanyahu convinced Trump that Iran was weakened enough to finish in two days, and that no better opening would ever come. Trump turned on that analysis once the war dragged on. "The enemy started the war with unconditional surrender." Araghchi said Iran ended it with a memorandum in which the U.S. committed not to start any war against Iran, not to threaten Iran, to respect Iran's sovereignty and territorial integrity, and to stay out of its internal affairs.

Interview PART 5, TRANSLATED Iran's FM: Iran Forced The U.S. To Sign A NON AGGRESSION Commitment Dr. Abbas Araghchi said Netanyahu convinced Trump that Iran was weakened enough to finish in two days, and that no better opening would ever come. Trump turned on that analysis once the war dragged on. "The enemy started the war with unconditional surrender." Araghchi said Iran ended it with a memorandum in which the U.S. committed not to start any war against Iran, not to threaten Iran, to respect Iran's sovereignty and territorial integrity, and to stay out of its internal affairs.

Ryan Rozbiani

24,867 views • 1 month ago

🇺🇸🇮🇷 JD Vance says the maximalist 10 point plan was thrown away! “The first 10 point proposal we think, frankly, was probably written by CHATGPT that was submitted to Steve Whitkoff and Jared Kushner. That immediately went the GARBAGE and was rejected!" The plan trump agreed on as a starting position is different …

🇺🇸🇮🇷 JD Vance says the maximalist 10 point plan was thrown away! “The first 10 point proposal we think, frankly, was probably written by CHATGPT that was submitted to Steve Whitkoff and Jared Kushner. That immediately went the GARBAGE and was rejected!" The plan trump agreed on as a starting position is different …

Lord Bebo

32,895 views • 4 months ago

Iran: We Rejected Ceasefire, Wanted War's END Foreign Minister Dr. Abbas Araghchi: "We did not want a CEASEFIRE. We wanted the war to END, so it would never happen again. We did not want a repeat of the twelve-day war that stopped with a ceasefire and then happened again months later. The day the Americans became hopeless of achieving their goals, on the evening of a war cabinet meeting, TRUMP tweeted just two words: 'UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER.' What followed was a fifteen-point SURRENDER document."

Iran: We Rejected Ceasefire, Wanted War's END Foreign Minister Dr. Abbas Araghchi: "We did not want a CEASEFIRE. We wanted the war to END, so it would never happen again. We did not want a repeat of the twelve-day war that stopped with a ceasefire and then happened again months later. The day the Americans became hopeless of achieving their goals, on the evening of a war cabinet meeting, TRUMP tweeted just two words: 'UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER.' What followed was a fifteen-point SURRENDER document."

Ryan Rozbiani

13,034 views • 3 days ago

🇺🇸🇮🇷 JD Vance on Iran negotiations: Iran's Speaker of Parliament says 3 of the 10 ceasefire points have already been violated. Vance’s instant spin: “Well that must mean there’s a lot of agreement… because there’s a 15-point plan and a 10-point plan floating around!” Diplomatic gaslighting level: expert 😂 Source: C-SPAN

🇺🇸🇮🇷 JD Vance on Iran negotiations: Iran's Speaker of Parliament says 3 of the 10 ceasefire points have already been violated. Vance’s instant spin: “Well that must mean there’s a lot of agreement… because there’s a 15-point plan and a 10-point plan floating around!” Diplomatic gaslighting level: expert 😂 Source: C-SPAN

Mario Nawfal

110,875 views • 4 months ago

Iran's FM: NO Negotiations with U.S., Strait Of Hormuz Reopens When They Honoring MoU Dr. Abbas Araghchi: "We do not currently have negotiations with the U.S. What is happening is an exchange of messages through intermediaries, not negotiations. As long as the U.S. does not stop its violations of the memorandum, there is no possibility of resuming negotiations."

Iran's FM: NO Negotiations with U.S., Strait Of Hormuz Reopens When They Honoring MoU Dr. Abbas Araghchi: "We do not currently have negotiations with the U.S. What is happening is an exchange of messages through intermediaries, not negotiations. As long as the U.S. does not stop its violations of the memorandum, there is no possibility of resuming negotiations."

Ryan Rozbiani

19,673 views • 12 days ago

An Iranian military spokesperson mocked U.S. attempts at a ceasefire deal Wednesday, insisting the Americans were only negotiating with themselves. It came shortly after the Trump administration sent a 15-point ceasefire plan to Iran through Pakistan and following President Trump's comments about talks with Iran. However, Iran's state-owned Press TV said later on Wednesday that the regime rejected the list of points sent by the Trump administration. Ramy Inocencio reports. More updates:

An Iranian military spokesperson mocked U.S. attempts at a ceasefire deal Wednesday, insisting the Americans were only negotiating with themselves. It came shortly after the Trump administration sent a 15-point ceasefire plan to Iran through Pakistan and following President Trump's comments about talks with Iran. However, Iran's state-owned Press TV said later on Wednesday that the regime rejected the list of points sent by the Trump administration. Ramy Inocencio reports. More updates:

CBS News

14,598 views • 4 months ago

🚨 BREAKING: Iran has rejected a ceasefire proposal from mediators, according to state-run IRNA News Agency, and issued a 10-point list of demands — including the removal of sanctions — before any negotiations can begin.

🚨 BREAKING: Iran has rejected a ceasefire proposal from mediators, according to state-run IRNA News Agency, and issued a 10-point list of demands — including the removal of sanctions — before any negotiations can begin.

Breaking911

199,831 views • 4 months ago

Trump sent Iran a 15-point plan to end the war, but they immediately rejected it. Melania was like, “Smart.” #FallonTonight

Trump sent Iran a 15-point plan to end the war, but they immediately rejected it. Melania was like, “Smart.” #FallonTonight

The Tonight Show

82,875 views • 4 months ago

"Now you wonder... what exactly was agreed to here?" Nobody knows if the US and Israel accepted Iran's 10-point plan.

"Now you wonder... what exactly was agreed to here?" Nobody knows if the US and Israel accepted Iran's 10-point plan.

Fuentes Updates

14,557 views • 4 months ago

❗️Full story behind betraying Iran’s leader, as narrated by Mahdi Khanalizadeh According to Khanalizadeh, a prominent Iranian journalist, after the Leader’s martyrdom, the US quickly asked for a ceasefire, which Iran naturally rejected. After the new Leader was chosen, Iranian officials prepared a 5-point plan for talks with the US, but the Leader rejected it. After several rounds of revision, a 10-point framework was produced, which became the basis of the first SNSC statement. The Leader also added 8 extra conditions to that framework, including that there should be no nuclear negotiations at all. He says the US initially accepted those 10 points as the basis because it needed a ceasefire, but once the Iranian team reached Islamabad, the Americans refused to negotiate on that basis. Despite the Leader’s written instruction, the Iranian side reportedly discussed the nuclear file. This made the Americans conclude that Iran did not really want to continue the war, and that if they pushed hard, they could extract concessions. After Islamabad, the negotiating team sent reports to the Leader. The Leader reacted negatively and objected, saying they had acted against religious/legal duty by discussing the nuclear issue and by failing to impose the 10 conditions. Some SNSC members then wrote to him, arguing that talks could not happen without the nuclear issue and warned about continued war and attacks on infrastructure. The Leader replied that “these negotiations would benefit neither their worldly affairs nor their afterlife,” and would not prevent Iran’s infrastructure from being hit. After that, the negotiating team restarted message exchanges, completely set aside the 10-point framework, and pursued a new 14-point plan initiated by the Foreign Ministry, which became the Islamabad MoU. The SNSC approved it and sent it to the Leader, but he gave no answer for about 2 weeks. SNSC officials then considered treating his silence as approval, but at that meeting a letter from the Leader arrived with questions for each SNSC member. Each member answered, and officials gave written commitments explaining how the clauses would be interpreted and implemented. One example given is that the “non-interference” clause (US not interfering in Iran’s affairs( would mean shutting down some hostile anti-propaganda media outlets (such as Iran International, ManotoTV, …). Only after these written commitments did the Leader authorize the MoU. Khanealizadeh says this is the context behind the Leader’s phrase: “I had a different view.” The Leader was not merely opposed to parts of the final MoU; he was against the whole post-Islamabad negotiation path once it moved away from the original 10-point framework. The process, according to him, went forward because of pressure and insistence from the SNSC.

❗️Full story behind betraying Iran’s leader, as narrated by Mahdi Khanalizadeh According to Khanalizadeh, a prominent Iranian journalist, after the Leader’s martyrdom, the US quickly asked for a ceasefire, which Iran naturally rejected. After the new Leader was chosen, Iranian officials prepared a 5-point plan for talks with the US, but the Leader rejected it. After several rounds of revision, a 10-point framework was produced, which became the basis of the first SNSC statement. The Leader also added 8 extra conditions to that framework, including that there should be no nuclear negotiations at all. He says the US initially accepted those 10 points as the basis because it needed a ceasefire, but once the Iranian team reached Islamabad, the Americans refused to negotiate on that basis. Despite the Leader’s written instruction, the Iranian side reportedly discussed the nuclear file. This made the Americans conclude that Iran did not really want to continue the war, and that if they pushed hard, they could extract concessions. After Islamabad, the negotiating team sent reports to the Leader. The Leader reacted negatively and objected, saying they had acted against religious/legal duty by discussing the nuclear issue and by failing to impose the 10 conditions. Some SNSC members then wrote to him, arguing that talks could not happen without the nuclear issue and warned about continued war and attacks on infrastructure. The Leader replied that “these negotiations would benefit neither their worldly affairs nor their afterlife,” and would not prevent Iran’s infrastructure from being hit. After that, the negotiating team restarted message exchanges, completely set aside the 10-point framework, and pursued a new 14-point plan initiated by the Foreign Ministry, which became the Islamabad MoU. The SNSC approved it and sent it to the Leader, but he gave no answer for about 2 weeks. SNSC officials then considered treating his silence as approval, but at that meeting a letter from the Leader arrived with questions for each SNSC member. Each member answered, and officials gave written commitments explaining how the clauses would be interpreted and implemented. One example given is that the “non-interference” clause (US not interfering in Iran’s affairs( would mean shutting down some hostile anti-propaganda media outlets (such as Iran International, ManotoTV, …). Only after these written commitments did the Leader authorize the MoU. Khanealizadeh says this is the context behind the Leader’s phrase: “I had a different view.” The Leader was not merely opposed to parts of the final MoU; he was against the whole post-Islamabad negotiation path once it moved away from the original 10-point framework. The process, according to him, went forward because of pressure and insistence from the SNSC.

Arya Yadegaar

289,682 views • 2 months ago

NEW: Iran submitted what JD Vance describes as a 10-point proposal that looked like it was written by ChatGPT, which was thrown in the trash. Vance ripped the media for spreading the wrong 10-point proposals. "There are three different ten-point proposals at least that I've seen floating around..." "There was a second ten-point proposal that was much more reasonable... That is the 10-point proposal that the president was referencing in his Truth yesterday."

NEW: Iran submitted what JD Vance describes as a 10-point proposal that looked like it was written by ChatGPT, which was thrown in the trash. Vance ripped the media for spreading the wrong 10-point proposals. "There are three different ten-point proposals at least that I've seen floating around..." "There was a second ten-point proposal that was much more reasonable... That is the 10-point proposal that the president was referencing in his Truth yesterday."

Collin Rugg

215,546 views • 4 months ago

🚨 BREAKING: JD Vance just exposed that the Fake News keeps posting TRASHED or REJECTED Iranian 10-point proposals, misleading the American people "The first 10 point proposal we think, frankly, was probably written by CHATGPT that was submitted to Steve Whitkoff and Jared Kushner. That immediately went the GARBAGE and was rejected!" "I've seen a lot of reporting from the American media about the 10 point proposal. That the Iranians have made!" "There are 3 different 10 point proposals, at least that I've seen floating around." "There was a second 10 point proposal that was much more reasonable that was based on some back and forth between us between the Pakistanis and that is the 10 point proposal that the President referenced in his TRUTH yesterday." "And then frankly, I've seen a third 10 point proposal that's even more maximalist than the first 10 point proposal that's been floating around various social media channels." Go off JD!

🚨 BREAKING: JD Vance just exposed that the Fake News keeps posting TRASHED or REJECTED Iranian 10-point proposals, misleading the American people "The first 10 point proposal we think, frankly, was probably written by CHATGPT that was submitted to Steve Whitkoff and Jared Kushner. That immediately went the GARBAGE and was rejected!" "I've seen a lot of reporting from the American media about the 10 point proposal. That the Iranians have made!" "There are 3 different 10 point proposals, at least that I've seen floating around." "There was a second 10 point proposal that was much more reasonable that was based on some back and forth between us between the Pakistanis and that is the 10 point proposal that the President referenced in his TRUTH yesterday." "And then frankly, I've seen a third 10 point proposal that's even more maximalist than the first 10 point proposal that's been floating around various social media channels." Go off JD!

Eric Daugherty

804,145 views • 4 months ago