Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

🚨INTERVIEW: “UKRAINE IS A DANGEROUS CRIMINAL STATE” Jackson Hinkle 🇺🇸 dismissed Trump's peace plan for Ukraine, calling it naive, claiming it ignores Ukraine’s internal repression and the broader structural roots of the war. He accused Ukraine’s security services of operating like a rogue force, targeting civilians, silencing dissent, and...

19,849 views • 8 months ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Listen to Bernard-Henri Lévy—a philosopher who has not just witnessed the war firsthand but argues that Ukraine is actually Europe's most vital security asset. As BHL puts it, Kyiv has the continent's best army, full stop, with the high-intensity experience to prove it. This isn't just about winning; it’s about making Ukraine the ultimate guarantor of European safety. Let's hear why he thinks bringing Ukraine into NATO isn't a risk—it's the only smart move against putin’s global chaos. Bernard-Henri Lévy: “For me, the security guarantees are not really NATO. If Ukraine were to join NATO, it wouldn't be NATO guaranteeing Ukraine's security. I believe it would be Ukraine that would be a security guarantee for Europe.” Host: “You wrote an editorial about that.” Bernard-Henri Lévy: “Yes, an editorial, because I think it is the best army in Europe. It is the only one that knows how to fight, it is the only one capable of deploying a significant number of men, and it is the only one that knows how to use our own weapons. The Caesar cannons, the …. , which are probably already in the field for some, and other sophisticated weapons. The only ones who know how to operate them today are the Ukrainians. So I think...” Host: “French soldiers know how to do it too.” Bernard-Henri Lévy: “Well yes, they know how to do it, except they know how to do it in theory. Knowing how to do it as I have seen the Ukrainians do it... I saw a French Caesar cannon in operation in Pokrovsk, it’s in my latest film, "Dans notre guerre" (In Our War). Well, the Ukrainians, they know how to do it in the snow, they know how to do it under fire, they know how to do it with attackers 2 km away. It's not quite the same knowledge. So, what I mean is that those who lose the most from this compromise are perhaps precisely the European countries and the NATO countries, because, even though the Americans will never let Ukraine join NATO (for now with Donald Trump it is impossible), well, it’s a shame for us. There you have it. It’s a shame for France, it’s a shame for Poland, it’s a shame for the Baltic States, it’s a shame for the West. There, I'm telling you. Bernard-Henri Lévy: Secondly, regarding the security guarantees from the United States and Europe towards Ukraine... On that, I am, like the Ukrainians often are, extremely skeptical. Because they have had security guarantees, since the Budapest Memorandum, when they were told: "Be nice, we are going to consolidate the nuclear weapons, there is no reason to leave them in both Russia and Ukraine. We'll gather everything in Ukraine, but we will give you security guarantees." The result was, a few years later, the shooting on the Maidan: 105 or 106 young people massacred in plain sight, without Europe lifting a finger, by militiamen in Moscow's pay, and so on. So, the true security guarantee for Ukraine is its army, its president, its civilian population, the skill and the incredible intelligence and composure of this man. Honestly, I don't know how this man, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, I don't know how he holds up. I don't know how he endures these trials, these humiliations, this... the stupidity that he is sometimes confronted with. I... he is a... there is heroism and there is saintliness in Zelenskyy. There is saintliness.”

Yasmina

32,033 views • 8 months ago

I would like to remind you of several interesting factors about how Putin and Russia’s rhetoric about NATO has changed, as well as about Ukraine’s accession to NATO. In 2002, in Rome, when asked by a journalist about how Ukraine’s accession to NATO would affect relations between Russia and Ukraine, Putin replied that Ukraine is a sovereign state. And she herself has the right to freely choose her future, including the future of her security. And that Russia is not against if Ukraine and the Alliance decide that Ukraine will become a member of NATO. Now these liars are using NATO expansion as one of the reasons for their invasion. And this despite the fact that Ukraine has never been a member of this military bloc, and there were no plans to admit it there in the near future. And we all understand that all these reasons for the invasion are manipulation and lies in order to justify their aggression, terror and attempt to occupy Ukraine. Regarding the second part of the video, Putin says that NATO expansion is unacceptable in 2022. Some time later, when he is asked about Finland and Sweden joining NATO. He says he doesn't mind. NATO is the Defense Alliance. Even Article 5 of NATO implies collective security in the event of an attack on one of the Alliance countries. But this in no way obliges all NATO members to fight for a country that is itself an aggressor. Even if he is a member of NATO. Therefore, Putin’s manipulations that if Ukraine had joined NATO, it would have attacked Russia and started a war between NATO and Russia is a complete lie. Article 5 does not oblige one to fight for a side that itself is the aggressor. But only to protect a NATO member from attack and invasion by other countries. Against the backdrop of all this, all these fairy tales and Russian propaganda that Ukraine wanted to attack Russia is a lie. (I remind you that until 2014 Ukraine was not a member of NATO and there were no plans to admit it there, at least in the near future). And if Ukraine wanted to attack, why did it give up nuclear weapons? Why didn’t she carry out a massive militarization of the country, but, on the contrary, reduced the army? Why now, when the war is already going on, does Ukraine not enter Russian territory with its troops? After all, propaganda says that it was Ukraine that wanted to attack.

Igor Kyivskyi

226,429 views • 2 years ago