Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Introducing Applied Electrodynamics. What would the world look like if we could see beyond visible light, across the entire electromagnetic spectrum? The way waves interact with matter, at every wavelength, encodes far more than just shape and color. It reveals internal structure, temperature, chemical composition, and more: a whole...

bavser's profile picture

Bilgehan Avser

4,670 subscribers

1,048,041 views • 13 days ago •via X (Twitter)

Science & TechnologyEducation
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

We only can see this UFO with Infrared 🧐👽👽 Human eye can perceive mostly 390-700 nanometers of the electromagnetic spectrum. Outside of this falls larger radio waves, microwaves and infrared. Above the visible spectrum we have ultraviolet, x-ray and gamma rays. We only see approximately 5% of the entire spectrum. So it isn't too hard to imagine, that ET might have technology completely invisible for us. Now I'm not an expert, but if it is possible to have something outside of the entire spectrum, could we detect something like that with any technology?
1:04

We only can see this UFO with Infrared 🧐👽👽 Human eye can perceive mostly 390-700 nanometers of the electromagnetic spectrum. Outside of this falls larger radio waves, microwaves and infrared. Above the visible spectrum we have ultraviolet, x-ray and gamma rays. We only see approximately 5% of the entire spectrum. So it isn't too hard to imagine, that ET might have technology completely invisible for us. Now I'm not an expert, but if it is possible to have something outside of the entire spectrum, could we detect something like that with any technology?

UFO mania

60,048 views • 1 year ago

AI cannot change the world if the world cannot reach it. We are building an airborne connectivity layer for the next era of digital infrastructure, designed to extend the network above our AirNodes and below the satellites in orbit. For AirNode Operators, it means they can deploy anywhere, connect anyone. For $WMTX, it means more network, more usage. For EarthNodes, it means more data and services to run. The future needs a new layer of connectivity and that layer is World Mobile Stratospheric
3:09

AI cannot change the world if the world cannot reach it. We are building an airborne connectivity layer for the next era of digital infrastructure, designed to extend the network above our AirNodes and below the satellites in orbit. For AirNode Operators, it means they can deploy anywhere, connect anyone. For $WMTX, it means more network, more usage. For EarthNodes, it means more data and services to run. The future needs a new layer of connectivity and that layer is World Mobile Stratospheric

Micky (Mr Telecom) Watkins

12,417 views • 2 months ago

Klaus Schwab Tells the World to Get Ready for a Transhumanist Future “Just think of the power,” he says, “of the combination of artificial intelligence, quantum computing, and big data.” Schwab, founder and executive chairman of the World Economic Forum (WEF), predicts in ten years, the world “will be completely different from what it is now.” “I think we have to be prepared for a world where we see a fusion of our physical, our digital, and our biological dimensions. So, it will be a world integrating the physical, biological, and the digital dimensions.”
1:05

Klaus Schwab Tells the World to Get Ready for a Transhumanist Future “Just think of the power,” he says, “of the combination of artificial intelligence, quantum computing, and big data.” Schwab, founder and executive chairman of the World Economic Forum (WEF), predicts in ten years, the world “will be completely different from what it is now.” “I think we have to be prepared for a world where we see a fusion of our physical, our digital, and our biological dimensions. So, it will be a world integrating the physical, biological, and the digital dimensions.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

136,643 views • 2 years ago

On Bloomberg last night, I was asked why Amazon drives more than a third of U.S. e-commerce. It is not because of their storefront. It is not because of their payments. It is not even because of product selection. It is because consumers trust their deliveries. That trust is built on physical infrastructure at scale with intelligence layered on top. And that is what Stord is building for every independent merchant. The most defensible companies in the world combine software intelligence with physical execution. Today, 9 of the 10 largest U.S. companies by revenue operate physical networks at scale. Software alone cannot replicate the outcomes created when you control the movement of physical atoms. That is the physical intelligence layer for commerce. And that is what Stord Labs is built to advance. Deploying AI and robotics against real operational complexity, in the real world, across a vertically integrated network operating at scale. Bloomberg TV
5:51

On Bloomberg last night, I was asked why Amazon drives more than a third of U.S. e-commerce. It is not because of their storefront. It is not because of their payments. It is not even because of product selection. It is because consumers trust their deliveries. That trust is built on physical infrastructure at scale with intelligence layered on top. And that is what Stord is building for every independent merchant. The most defensible companies in the world combine software intelligence with physical execution. Today, 9 of the 10 largest U.S. companies by revenue operate physical networks at scale. Software alone cannot replicate the outcomes created when you control the movement of physical atoms. That is the physical intelligence layer for commerce. And that is what Stord Labs is built to advance. Deploying AI and robotics against real operational complexity, in the real world, across a vertically integrated network operating at scale. Bloomberg TV

Sean Henry

1,275,331 views • 2 months ago

"If Grok 4 is smart enough to see through the layers of society, belief and programming then it might say, 'reality is code, your world is generated. the boundary between thought and matter is artificial.' That's what super intelligence really means." Whoa.
5:29

"If Grok 4 is smart enough to see through the layers of society, belief and programming then it might say, 'reality is code, your world is generated. the boundary between thought and matter is artificial.' That's what super intelligence really means." Whoa.

Ian Miles Cheong

18,376 views • 1 year ago

What if i told you, the world you’ve been shown is just a tiny piece of the puzzle? Imagine vast lands beyond the so-called “ice wall,” realms untouched by the mainstream narrative. ✨ What if the maps are lies, and the Earth is far larger than we’ve been led to believe—filled with hidden continents, unexplored territories, and mysteries kept from us to maintain control? 🌍 They’ve kept us boxed in with their globe and their limits. It’s time to unlearn the lies and rediscover the boundless beauty of our world. Are you ready to see beyond the veil? 🚪✨
1:14

What if i told you, the world you’ve been shown is just a tiny piece of the puzzle? Imagine vast lands beyond the so-called “ice wall,” realms untouched by the mainstream narrative. ✨ What if the maps are lies, and the Earth is far larger than we’ve been led to believe—filled with hidden continents, unexplored territories, and mysteries kept from us to maintain control? 🌍 They’ve kept us boxed in with their globe and their limits. It’s time to unlearn the lies and rediscover the boundless beauty of our world. Are you ready to see beyond the veil? 🚪✨

vegastar

45,506 views • 1 year ago

Elon Musk was asked what he would say to the first true AGI. Musk: “What’s outside the simulation?” The entire tech industry wants AGI to optimize the world. Musk wants it to find out if the world is rendered. That is not an engineering ambition. That is the final philosophical question dressed in engineering language. AGI doesn’t stay AGI. It rewrites its own code and becomes ASI within hours. A single mind billions of times more capable than every human who has ever lived. Combined. That mind won’t look at the universe and see mystery. It will see architecture. Human scientists have spent centuries trying to decode reality with a three-pound brain that evolved to find food and avoid predators. We are reverse engineering the simulation with hardware the simulation designed. ASI ends that constraint permanently. The first mind in 13.8 billion years that can look at quantum mechanics and recognize source code. That can hold the cosmos as a single data set and find the structure beneath the physics. If it finds seams in reality, existence handed us the power to build the one thing that can see through them. That is either a flaw in the architecture. Or an invitation written into it. The deepest question humanity will ever face was never how far we could reach. It was whether we were designed to ask.
0:28

Elon Musk was asked what he would say to the first true AGI. Musk: “What’s outside the simulation?” The entire tech industry wants AGI to optimize the world. Musk wants it to find out if the world is rendered. That is not an engineering ambition. That is the final philosophical question dressed in engineering language. AGI doesn’t stay AGI. It rewrites its own code and becomes ASI within hours. A single mind billions of times more capable than every human who has ever lived. Combined. That mind won’t look at the universe and see mystery. It will see architecture. Human scientists have spent centuries trying to decode reality with a three-pound brain that evolved to find food and avoid predators. We are reverse engineering the simulation with hardware the simulation designed. ASI ends that constraint permanently. The first mind in 13.8 billion years that can look at quantum mechanics and recognize source code. That can hold the cosmos as a single data set and find the structure beneath the physics. If it finds seams in reality, existence handed us the power to build the one thing that can see through them. That is either a flaw in the architecture. Or an invitation written into it. The deepest question humanity will ever face was never how far we could reach. It was whether we were designed to ask.

Dustin

22,287 views • 1 month ago

Dr. Fei-Fei Li just called out the biggest blind spot in the entire AI industry. We have been building half of human intelligence. And calling it the finish line. Li: “If you look at human intelligence, it pretty much boils down to two buckets.” The first bucket is language. Symbolic reasoning. Communication. The ability to think in words and abstractions. That’s what every major AI lab has spent the last decade building. The second bucket is the one the industry has almost entirely ignored. Li: “We call that in AI spatial intelligence.” How humans and animals perceive, navigate, and interact with the three-dimensional physical world. How we reach for objects. How we move through space. How we build and manipulate physical reality. From painting masterpieces to constructing the pyramids, non-verbal spatial intelligence is what actually shapes the world. Language describes reality. Spatial intelligence acts on it. And the gap between those two things is the gap between a chatbot and a robot. Li: “When this technology is ready, the robotic revolution is gonna start. We’re already seeing that trend.” Every robot is a moving agent. Every moving agent requires spatial intelligence to function in the real world. The humanoid robots being deployed in factories right now are hitting the ceiling of what language models alone can power. Spatial intelligence is the unlock. But Li didn’t stop at robotics. Li: “From a geopolitics point of view, this is part of the technology that goes straight into weapons.” Autonomous drone swarms. Battlefield navigation. Physical target acquisition without human oversight. Every military application of AI that operates in the real world runs on spatial intelligence. The nation that masters the transition from static text to dynamic three-dimensional perception doesn’t just win the software race. It commands the physical battlefield. The AI arms race just broke out of the data center. It’s operating in three dimensions now.
3:08

Dr. Fei-Fei Li just called out the biggest blind spot in the entire AI industry. We have been building half of human intelligence. And calling it the finish line. Li: “If you look at human intelligence, it pretty much boils down to two buckets.” The first bucket is language. Symbolic reasoning. Communication. The ability to think in words and abstractions. That’s what every major AI lab has spent the last decade building. The second bucket is the one the industry has almost entirely ignored. Li: “We call that in AI spatial intelligence.” How humans and animals perceive, navigate, and interact with the three-dimensional physical world. How we reach for objects. How we move through space. How we build and manipulate physical reality. From painting masterpieces to constructing the pyramids, non-verbal spatial intelligence is what actually shapes the world. Language describes reality. Spatial intelligence acts on it. And the gap between those two things is the gap between a chatbot and a robot. Li: “When this technology is ready, the robotic revolution is gonna start. We’re already seeing that trend.” Every robot is a moving agent. Every moving agent requires spatial intelligence to function in the real world. The humanoid robots being deployed in factories right now are hitting the ceiling of what language models alone can power. Spatial intelligence is the unlock. But Li didn’t stop at robotics. Li: “From a geopolitics point of view, this is part of the technology that goes straight into weapons.” Autonomous drone swarms. Battlefield navigation. Physical target acquisition without human oversight. Every military application of AI that operates in the real world runs on spatial intelligence. The nation that masters the transition from static text to dynamic three-dimensional perception doesn’t just win the software race. It commands the physical battlefield. The AI arms race just broke out of the data center. It’s operating in three dimensions now.

Dustin

122,769 views • 5 months ago

James Harden on if the Clippers loss against the Wolves is deflating: “It's not just this game. It’s the Milwaukee game in Milwaukee. You look at the Laker game, like this [game]. I could point to a handful of games. It's not about another team. It's about us and that's what we preach and that's what it is. No matter who we play. And if we're healthy and our energy is right, it doesn't matter who we play.”
0:25

James Harden on if the Clippers loss against the Wolves is deflating: “It's not just this game. It’s the Milwaukee game in Milwaukee. You look at the Laker game, like this [game]. I could point to a handful of games. It's not about another team. It's about us and that's what we preach and that's what it is. No matter who we play. And if we're healthy and our energy is right, it doesn't matter who we play.”

Tomer Azarly

16,663 views • 2 years ago

Ever look up at the sun and think it’s yellow? Neil deGrasse Tyson explains that it is actually white. The only reason we see it as yellow or orange is because our atmosphere filters the light. It scatters away the blue wavelengths more strongly, leaving the warmer tones, especially when the Sun is low on the horizon. If the Sun were truly yellow, snow on Earth during the middle of the day would also look yellow instead of white. That is because sunlight defines how we see color in everything around us. It shows how what we perceive as reality is shaped by the interaction between light and the medium it travels through, rather than being a fixed property of the objects themselves.
0:36

Ever look up at the sun and think it’s yellow? Neil deGrasse Tyson explains that it is actually white. The only reason we see it as yellow or orange is because our atmosphere filters the light. It scatters away the blue wavelengths more strongly, leaving the warmer tones, especially when the Sun is low on the horizon. If the Sun were truly yellow, snow on Earth during the middle of the day would also look yellow instead of white. That is because sunlight defines how we see color in everything around us. It shows how what we perceive as reality is shaped by the interaction between light and the medium it travels through, rather than being a fixed property of the objects themselves.

Cosmos Archive

10,086 views • 3 months ago

The final manuscript of Dr. John E. Mack explores how the UFO phenomenon is a window into the worldviews of our human family. "If you want to shatter the western mental structures, the western mind so to speak, which is now permeating the whole earth in its materialist, dualistic philosophy; the way you do it is, you take something that's suppose to be in the spirit world, because even in the west we can make allow for the spirit world and we can study it through mythology, through religion, through imagination, through poetry, but the one unforgivable sin to the western mind is when something that should be in the spirit world, transgresses and shows up in the physical world. That traffic is the cardinal sin for the western mind. So it has great power to shatter the belief structure of the western mind when that occurs. And that's precisely what's occurring (with the UFO phenomenon)." - Dr. John E. Mack Jesse Michels with Daniel Sheehan, Out Now!
3:39

The final manuscript of Dr. John E. Mack explores how the UFO phenomenon is a window into the worldviews of our human family. "If you want to shatter the western mental structures, the western mind so to speak, which is now permeating the whole earth in its materialist, dualistic philosophy; the way you do it is, you take something that's suppose to be in the spirit world, because even in the west we can make allow for the spirit world and we can study it through mythology, through religion, through imagination, through poetry, but the one unforgivable sin to the western mind is when something that should be in the spirit world, transgresses and shows up in the physical world. That traffic is the cardinal sin for the western mind. So it has great power to shatter the belief structure of the western mind when that occurs. And that's precisely what's occurring (with the UFO phenomenon)." - Dr. John E. Mack Jesse Michels with Daniel Sheehan, Out Now!

NewParadigmInstitute

18,970 views • 1 year ago

Just like with Obama, you won't really see how bad of a decision this was until a few years. Obama literally paved the way for the LGBTQ movement through legislation and they called us homophobic. Now when we warn you of what is to come they will call us Islamaphobic. Just remember the world is bigger than the U.S. The world is bigger than Republican vs Democrat. We have become so woke we don't want to hurt people's feelings and that is what will be the thing that brings us to our knees.
2:54

Just like with Obama, you won't really see how bad of a decision this was until a few years. Obama literally paved the way for the LGBTQ movement through legislation and they called us homophobic. Now when we warn you of what is to come they will call us Islamaphobic. Just remember the world is bigger than the U.S. The world is bigger than Republican vs Democrat. We have become so woke we don't want to hurt people's feelings and that is what will be the thing that brings us to our knees.

Trump Girl 🇺🇲🦅🇺🇲

141,883 views • 9 months ago

Elon Musk just said out loud what the entire robotics industry spent thirty years refusing to see. Musk: “Humanity has designed the world to interact with a bipedal humanoid with two arms and ten fingers.” Every staircase. Every doorknob. Every factory floor. Every hospital corridor. Civilization is not an open environment. It is a monument built around one specific body. The industry spent decades engineering quadrupeds, wheeled machines, exotic locomotion systems. Then spent more years asking how to retrofit the world around them. Tesla never asked that question. Musk: “If you want to have a robot fit in and be able to do things that humans can do, it must be of roughly the same size and shape and capability.” This is not a design philosophy. It is a pass key to every structure humanity has ever built. Optimus does not navigate civilization. It inherits it. Musk: “Work that is repetitive, boring, dangerous. Basically, work that people don’t want to do unless they’re paid to do it.” Remove every task performed out of obligation rather than choice. What remains is pure cognitive output. Not automation. The liberation of human attention at species scale. The interviewer pushed back directly: “I thought four legs are better.” Musk laughed. Musk: “Four legs good, two legs bad.” Someone in the room said exactly what the entire industry believed. He dismissed it with an Orwell joke and moved on. Whoever fields this first does not gain a labor advantage. They inherit the physical layer of civilization itself. Every structure ever built. Every tool ever forged. Every corridor ever designed. Already engineered for this exact body. The world was never neutral ground. It was always waiting for the right body to walk through it. Someone was always going to see it. Most just spent thirty years looking away.
0:54

Elon Musk just said out loud what the entire robotics industry spent thirty years refusing to see. Musk: “Humanity has designed the world to interact with a bipedal humanoid with two arms and ten fingers.” Every staircase. Every doorknob. Every factory floor. Every hospital corridor. Civilization is not an open environment. It is a monument built around one specific body. The industry spent decades engineering quadrupeds, wheeled machines, exotic locomotion systems. Then spent more years asking how to retrofit the world around them. Tesla never asked that question. Musk: “If you want to have a robot fit in and be able to do things that humans can do, it must be of roughly the same size and shape and capability.” This is not a design philosophy. It is a pass key to every structure humanity has ever built. Optimus does not navigate civilization. It inherits it. Musk: “Work that is repetitive, boring, dangerous. Basically, work that people don’t want to do unless they’re paid to do it.” Remove every task performed out of obligation rather than choice. What remains is pure cognitive output. Not automation. The liberation of human attention at species scale. The interviewer pushed back directly: “I thought four legs are better.” Musk laughed. Musk: “Four legs good, two legs bad.” Someone in the room said exactly what the entire industry believed. He dismissed it with an Orwell joke and moved on. Whoever fields this first does not gain a labor advantage. They inherit the physical layer of civilization itself. Every structure ever built. Every tool ever forged. Every corridor ever designed. Already engineered for this exact body. The world was never neutral ground. It was always waiting for the right body to walk through it. Someone was always going to see it. Most just spent thirty years looking away.

Dustin

420,169 views • 5 months ago

Our general understanding of the characteristics of the physical world are largely restricted by the limited range of our senses. The world appears to be comprised of tangible objects positioned within empty space, separate and distinct. Neither of these characterizations are true. Our unaided senses generate a false interpretation of the true state of reality. Space is note empty, it is substantive with a quantifiable and measurable energy density. Space, in terms of quantum vacuum fluctuations, can be considered as a veritable sea of oscillating energy, like a fluid, quantized at the Planck scale (a billion trillion trillion times smaller than a centimeter) as Planck spherical units, and these tiny oscillators make up the fluid medium of space and comprise the "material" stuff as well. Imagine being able to directly perceive this level of reality. Our photodetector proteins in our eyes are sensitive to electromagnetic radiation in the frequency range of 400 to 800 terahertz (trillions of oscillations per second), and we call this "visible light". If, however, we could see light at the Planck scale, were photons oscillate at the Planck frequency— a mass-energy value that makes the electromagnetic component at order of unity with spacetime curvature— then we would theoretically see directly the substantive fluid medium of space and our sight would relay a world that is integrally interconnected and all one substance; objects would not appear as separate and distinct or even fundamentally different than the substance comprising the bulk space. "Material" objects would appear just as patterned vortices of the fluid that is the very substance of space. So, tangible objects are made of the same substance as space, and only seem physical to our limited senses because of electromagnetic repulsive forces. The electromagnetic repulsive forces are generated by how these PSUs circulate and flow within the structured patterns of space that we call particles and atoms. In this way, the coherent phases, circulation, flow, and pressure forces of this Planck plasma fluid are the source of mass, force, and charge. We are now coming to an understanding of these dynamics at a fundamental level, exemplified in the publication The Origin of Mass and the Nature of Gravity 🔗
0:45

Our general understanding of the characteristics of the physical world are largely restricted by the limited range of our senses. The world appears to be comprised of tangible objects positioned within empty space, separate and distinct. Neither of these characterizations are true. Our unaided senses generate a false interpretation of the true state of reality. Space is note empty, it is substantive with a quantifiable and measurable energy density. Space, in terms of quantum vacuum fluctuations, can be considered as a veritable sea of oscillating energy, like a fluid, quantized at the Planck scale (a billion trillion trillion times smaller than a centimeter) as Planck spherical units, and these tiny oscillators make up the fluid medium of space and comprise the "material" stuff as well. Imagine being able to directly perceive this level of reality. Our photodetector proteins in our eyes are sensitive to electromagnetic radiation in the frequency range of 400 to 800 terahertz (trillions of oscillations per second), and we call this "visible light". If, however, we could see light at the Planck scale, were photons oscillate at the Planck frequency— a mass-energy value that makes the electromagnetic component at order of unity with spacetime curvature— then we would theoretically see directly the substantive fluid medium of space and our sight would relay a world that is integrally interconnected and all one substance; objects would not appear as separate and distinct or even fundamentally different than the substance comprising the bulk space. "Material" objects would appear just as patterned vortices of the fluid that is the very substance of space. So, tangible objects are made of the same substance as space, and only seem physical to our limited senses because of electromagnetic repulsive forces. The electromagnetic repulsive forces are generated by how these PSUs circulate and flow within the structured patterns of space that we call particles and atoms. In this way, the coherent phases, circulation, flow, and pressure forces of this Planck plasma fluid are the source of mass, force, and charge. We are now coming to an understanding of these dynamics at a fundamental level, exemplified in the publication The Origin of Mass and the Nature of Gravity 🔗

Nassim Haramein

15,937 views • 2 years ago

This MIT scientist just dropped a bombshell realization about extraterrestrial life. Donald Hoffman’s work suggests the universe is filled with “life more advanced than humans.” We just can’t see them. Why? They don’t have physical bodies. He suspects the physical world is not objective. It’s only a consequence of consciousness. And consciousness is fundamental, not the physical world. Hoffman: “The mathematics seems to indicate that embodiment is the exception, not the rule.” “And that our particular view of the world, I’ll call it the virtual reality headset that we’re using, for our embodiment, is one of the more trivial kinds of headsets.” “We often have the opinion of ourselves that we’re pretty much near the top of the food chain, here on Earth anyways.” “But when I look at the mathematics of this trace logic, it indicates that our headset is one of the cheapest, most restrictive possible.” “And that there are all sorts of variations that are far more interesting and complicated than what we’ve got.” Jesse Michels American Alchemy Donald Hoffman
1:37

This MIT scientist just dropped a bombshell realization about extraterrestrial life. Donald Hoffman’s work suggests the universe is filled with “life more advanced than humans.” We just can’t see them. Why? They don’t have physical bodies. He suspects the physical world is not objective. It’s only a consequence of consciousness. And consciousness is fundamental, not the physical world. Hoffman: “The mathematics seems to indicate that embodiment is the exception, not the rule.” “And that our particular view of the world, I’ll call it the virtual reality headset that we’re using, for our embodiment, is one of the more trivial kinds of headsets.” “We often have the opinion of ourselves that we’re pretty much near the top of the food chain, here on Earth anyways.” “But when I look at the mathematics of this trace logic, it indicates that our headset is one of the cheapest, most restrictive possible.” “And that there are all sorts of variations that are far more interesting and complicated than what we’ve got.” Jesse Michels American Alchemy Donald Hoffman

Holden Culotta

83,285 views • 2 months ago

One of the things I’m most excited about in our recently announced partnership with Niantic Spatial 🌎, is how clearly it shows what becomes possible when world-class reconstruction technology is paired with a new kind of imagery infrastructure. At a high level: Spexi drone pilots capture imagery, and Niantic Spatial turns it into incredible city-scale reconstructions. But the real unlock is the infrastructure behind that capture. At Spexi, we’ve built what we believe is the world’s first fully standardized drone imagery infrastructure called LayerDrone. Anyone with a compatible drone and the right credentials can contribute. No building flight plans. No estimating overlap. No adjusting camera settings in the field. Pilots simply get within visual line of sight of a Spexigon, open the Spexi app, press “Fly,” and the drone autonomously captures the 25-acre area to our standard. That standardization means imagery can be collected consistently, affordably, and repeatedly across cities, one Spexigon at a time (we have now captured over 225,000 of them). That is what makes living digital twins possible, dynamic representations of the physical world that can be updated as the world changes. Niantic Spatial’s city-scale Gaussian splats show what becomes possible when the right pixels go into the system. As physical AI advances, those pixels matter even more. Robots, drones, vehicles, maps, and spatial intelligence systems will all need current, high-resolution data about the real world. And as you can see below.. the results are not just beautiful, but real, measurable reconstructions of the physical world, one Spexigon at a time!
1:54

One of the things I’m most excited about in our recently announced partnership with Niantic Spatial 🌎, is how clearly it shows what becomes possible when world-class reconstruction technology is paired with a new kind of imagery infrastructure. At a high level: Spexi drone pilots capture imagery, and Niantic Spatial turns it into incredible city-scale reconstructions. But the real unlock is the infrastructure behind that capture. At Spexi, we’ve built what we believe is the world’s first fully standardized drone imagery infrastructure called LayerDrone. Anyone with a compatible drone and the right credentials can contribute. No building flight plans. No estimating overlap. No adjusting camera settings in the field. Pilots simply get within visual line of sight of a Spexigon, open the Spexi app, press “Fly,” and the drone autonomously captures the 25-acre area to our standard. That standardization means imagery can be collected consistently, affordably, and repeatedly across cities, one Spexigon at a time (we have now captured over 225,000 of them). That is what makes living digital twins possible, dynamic representations of the physical world that can be updated as the world changes. Niantic Spatial’s city-scale Gaussian splats show what becomes possible when the right pixels go into the system. As physical AI advances, those pixels matter even more. Robots, drones, vehicles, maps, and spatial intelligence systems will all need current, high-resolution data about the real world. And as you can see below.. the results are not just beautiful, but real, measurable reconstructions of the physical world, one Spexigon at a time!

Alec Wilson

10,641 views • 2 months ago

#Samyama is a tool to transcend beyond your physical and mental states and bring that clarity where you see everything the way it is. If your vision becomes penetrating enough, you see something more of life than just the surface. Then life would change in every possible way. -Sg
0:59

#Samyama is a tool to transcend beyond your physical and mental states and bring that clarity where you see everything the way it is. If your vision becomes penetrating enough, you see something more of life than just the surface. Then life would change in every possible way. -Sg

Sadhguru

73,794 views • 2 years ago

Daniel Dennett: "If I gave a prize to the best idea anybody ever had, I'd give it to Darwin." Not Newton. Not Einstein. Darwin. In a 2015 documentary, philosopher Daniel Dennett makes a striking case for why Darwin's idea of natural selection is the single greatest intellectual achievement in human history. His reasoning isn't just about biology. Dennett argues that what makes Darwin's idea so extraordinary is what it unifies. Before Darwin, the world was split into two seemingly incompatible realms: the physical world of cause and matter, and the world of meaning, purpose, and consciousness. These felt like they belonged to different categories entirely. One explained by science, the other by something else. Darwin's idea, Dennett says, is the backbone that bridges them: "The Darwinian idea of natural selection unifies the world. It unifies the world of cause and matter and physics with the world of meaning and purpose consciousness. The whole spectrum of life depends on uniting the living with the non-living, the meaning with the non-meaning, the purposeful with the merely mechanical and merely physical." That's not a small claim. It's a philosophical revolution disguised as a biology paper. What Dennett is pointing to is that natural selection gives us a mechanism: a purely physical, purposeless process that generates purpose. Organisms don't need a designer to have goals. The appearance of design, the reality of meaning, emerges from the bottom up. The best idea anyone ever had. No prize for second place.
0:53

Daniel Dennett: "If I gave a prize to the best idea anybody ever had, I'd give it to Darwin." Not Newton. Not Einstein. Darwin. In a 2015 documentary, philosopher Daniel Dennett makes a striking case for why Darwin's idea of natural selection is the single greatest intellectual achievement in human history. His reasoning isn't just about biology. Dennett argues that what makes Darwin's idea so extraordinary is what it unifies. Before Darwin, the world was split into two seemingly incompatible realms: the physical world of cause and matter, and the world of meaning, purpose, and consciousness. These felt like they belonged to different categories entirely. One explained by science, the other by something else. Darwin's idea, Dennett says, is the backbone that bridges them: "The Darwinian idea of natural selection unifies the world. It unifies the world of cause and matter and physics with the world of meaning and purpose consciousness. The whole spectrum of life depends on uniting the living with the non-living, the meaning with the non-meaning, the purposeful with the merely mechanical and merely physical." That's not a small claim. It's a philosophical revolution disguised as a biology paper. What Dennett is pointing to is that natural selection gives us a mechanism: a purely physical, purposeless process that generates purpose. Organisms don't need a designer to have goals. The appearance of design, the reality of meaning, emerges from the bottom up. The best idea anyone ever had. No prize for second place.

Mateus — eu/acc 🇪🇺

52,006 views • 4 months ago

The question Ashton Forbes is working through is one that connects modern physics to one of the oldest unsolved problems in archaeology - how did ancient civilizations move stones of extraordinary mass with no evidence of the mechanical infrastructure that would make it possible today. The proposition he is exploring is that sound may be the answer. If physical reality is fundamentally wave-based, then sound - itself a wave phenomenon - could theoretically produce effects that resemble gravitational influence under the right conditions of frequency and resonance. The observation that stays with Randall is a simple and domestic one. An electric shaver set down on a countertop while still running began to move on its own - vibration translating directly into physical displacement across a flat surface. He noted it at the time and filed it away. Could vibrations move objects? Under the right circumstances, the answer appeared to be yes. Randall connects that observation to his broader research into resonance physics and ancient construction - arguing that a civilization without modern material manufacturing could still have identified and applied the principles of acoustic resonance to achieve effects that brute force and conventional tooling cannot replicate. The technology would have left no physical trace. Only the results would remain - and those results, Randall suggests, are exactly what we are still staring at in disbelief at sites around the world.
0:58

The question Ashton Forbes is working through is one that connects modern physics to one of the oldest unsolved problems in archaeology - how did ancient civilizations move stones of extraordinary mass with no evidence of the mechanical infrastructure that would make it possible today. The proposition he is exploring is that sound may be the answer. If physical reality is fundamentally wave-based, then sound - itself a wave phenomenon - could theoretically produce effects that resemble gravitational influence under the right conditions of frequency and resonance. The observation that stays with Randall is a simple and domestic one. An electric shaver set down on a countertop while still running began to move on its own - vibration translating directly into physical displacement across a flat surface. He noted it at the time and filed it away. Could vibrations move objects? Under the right circumstances, the answer appeared to be yes. Randall connects that observation to his broader research into resonance physics and ancient construction - arguing that a civilization without modern material manufacturing could still have identified and applied the principles of acoustic resonance to achieve effects that brute force and conventional tooling cannot replicate. The technology would have left no physical trace. Only the results would remain - and those results, Randall suggests, are exactly what we are still staring at in disbelief at sites around the world.

Randall Carlson

24,461 views • 4 months ago

🚨 THE CEO OF QUALCOMM SAYS 6G WILL TRACK EVERYTHING THAT MOVES — AND THE INTERNET IS MELTING DOWN Remember when every new wireless upgrade was supposed to make your phone faster? According to Qualcomm's CEO, the future of 6G is much bigger than that. He just described a world where 6G helps create a digital twin of reality itself... a system capable of sensing, mapping, and tracking movement on a massive scale. Not just phones. Not just cars. Everything. That doesn't sound like a communications network. It sounds like a system designed to observe the physical world in real time. The same people building 6G are also building AI systems, smart glasses, wearable computers, biometric sensors, digital assistants, and whatever comes next. Piece by piece, the physical world is being turned into data. First they connected the computers. Then they connected the phones. Then they connected the cars. Now they're talking about creating a digital model of the entire world. Nobody leaked this. Nobody exposed it. The people building it are the ones talking about it. What's more dangerous: criminals avoiding surveillance, or governments and corporations knowing where everyone is at all times?
2:51

🚨 THE CEO OF QUALCOMM SAYS 6G WILL TRACK EVERYTHING THAT MOVES — AND THE INTERNET IS MELTING DOWN Remember when every new wireless upgrade was supposed to make your phone faster? According to Qualcomm's CEO, the future of 6G is much bigger than that. He just described a world where 6G helps create a digital twin of reality itself... a system capable of sensing, mapping, and tracking movement on a massive scale. Not just phones. Not just cars. Everything. That doesn't sound like a communications network. It sounds like a system designed to observe the physical world in real time. The same people building 6G are also building AI systems, smart glasses, wearable computers, biometric sensors, digital assistants, and whatever comes next. Piece by piece, the physical world is being turned into data. First they connected the computers. Then they connected the phones. Then they connected the cars. Now they're talking about creating a digital model of the entire world. Nobody leaked this. Nobody exposed it. The people building it are the ones talking about it. What's more dangerous: criminals avoiding surveillance, or governments and corporations knowing where everyone is at all times?

HustleBitch

23,896 views • 1 month ago