Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

🚨 Introducing Hash Network - World's Provenance Chain. Misinformation is at an all-time high. AI-generated content, deepfakes, and manipulated media make it impossible to tell what’s real. This crisis of authenticity undermines our ability to rely on the information we consume, leaving us questioning the integrity of everything from...

45,150 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

5 Comments

TheHedgehog.eth | The-Domains.com's profile picture
TheHedgehog.eth | The-Domains.com1 year ago

@davidtsocy @OffchainLabs @arbitrumcore @Saxenasaheb @0x_dav @ai16zdao @ai16zeliza @elizaOS @aixbt_agent @hmalviya9 👏🏼

Milk Road's profile picture
Milk Road1 year ago

Bitcoin is at all-time highs. We now have the most pro-crypto government in history. Fink is buying by the truckload. Yet, retail are still asleep. Pay attention anon. Subscribe now to our newsletter and join 330K+ crypto enthusiasts for daily insights. (it's free)

iProduct.Ξth ॐ🛸🦇🔊🇮🇳's profile picture
iProduct.Ξth ॐ🛸🦇🔊🇮🇳1 year ago

@davidtsocy @OffchainLabs @arbitrumcore @Saxenasaheb @0x_dav @ai16zdao @ai16zeliza @elizaOS @aixbt_agent @hmalviya9

DigitalNomad.eth🦇🔈| 2978.eth | 305.dao's profile picture
DigitalNomad.eth🦇🔈| 2978.eth | 305.dao1 year ago

@davidtsocy @OffchainLabs @arbitrumcore @Saxenasaheb @0x_dav @ai16zdao @ai16zeliza @elizaOS @aixbt_agent @hmalviya9 🔥🔥🔥

drea.eth's profile picture
drea.eth1 year ago

@davidtsocy @OffchainLabs @arbitrumcore @Saxenasaheb @0x_dav @ai16zdao @ai16zeliza @elizaOS @aixbt_agent @hmalviya9 👏👏👏

Related Videos

Why did Ian Whiffin agree to give expert testimony on Jen McCabe’s cellphone extraction, when the state refused to let him look at or even give him the full, original extraction OR its verification hash? A thread🧵 Full cellphone extractions, sometimes called forensic images, generate what’s called a “hash value”, which serves as a unique digital fingerprint necessary for ensuring the integrity of data. Any discrepancy between the hash values indicates tampering with or corruption of evidence, alerting forensic examiners to potential issues with the evidence. Hash verification is a fundamental principle and a rather ubiquitous practice in the world of digital forensics, where data validation and verification are key. It is the gold standard across the industry, and has also become so in the courtroom, whereby admissibility of digital evidence is determined by its relevance, authenticity and reliability. In court, the hash value can be used to demonstrate that the evidence has not been altered since its collection, and is a universal way for experts to authenticate and validate the reliability of data for the trial Court. But, an extraction that’s missing a hash value altogether is a huge red flag. 🚩 Who removed the hash value? And why? It’s necessary to the chain of custody, and as Gaurino and Tully would be well aware, it’s also an element of the data that an expert would require in order to verify and validate it. There’s no “good” reason for why someone would remove a hash value, and the extraction can’t be characterized as a forensic image as its origin is unknown. This was a deliberate step taken to hide something, which one could argue shows consciousness of guilt. If the data are true and accurate, why would you bring their integrity into question by removing the hash? However, if the data were altered or tampered with, and let’s say, hypothetically speaking, you wanted a digital forensic expert to provide testimony supportive of your “Google search” theory. . . In that hypothetical, you’d have to remove the hash value. Otherwise, the expert would immediately detect that the data were altered, as they would not be able to verify the hash against the original. #KarenReadTrial #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #FreeKarenRead #CantonCoverup #PoliceCorruption #KarenRead #Cellebrite #DFIR

Olivia

270,376 views • 1 year ago

🌋 Ripple & Amazon Explained | AI x Blockchain Infrastructure Deep Dive Ripple just showed how AWS Bedrock can support a 24/7 multi agent operating system for the XRP Ledger. The objective is faster log to code correlation, quicker issue triage, lower operational risk, and smoother long term scaling. This is not a partnership announcement. It is forward looking exploration focused on future proofing XRPL as mission critical infrastructure. Now zoom out. AI and DLT are converging fast, and the common thread is data provenance and verifiable trust. Algorand Native Python support and real presence in traditional developer ecosystems. Python is the language of AI, and Algorand leaned into that early. Hedera New Python SDK and agent tooling, plus verifiable compute. Accenture, NVIDIA, and EQTY Lab anchoring AI verification to Hedera Consensus Service is about auditability and authenticity, especially for public-sector systems. Constellation Common Crawl is foundational AI data. Constellation is working on provenance and audit history for scraped internet data, exactly where this is heading. Bittensor A decentralized AI network where models compete and get rewarded. If you talk crypto x AI, this has to be part of the conversation. Think the AI analogue to Bitcoin. Solana Always-on markets and tokenized equities accelerating. Ondo plans to expand tokenized stocks and ETFs to Solana in early 2026. XRP market structure CME adjusting XRP options strike listings reflects real liquidity and hedging demand. This is risk management infrastructure, not speculation. Plus: FXRP live for spot trading on Hyperliquid via Flare signals expanding cross-chain execution paths. Bottom line: AI without data provenance is untrustworthy, DLT without utility stays purely speculative. The convergence of real tech is happening, and it will define our future world. Networks mentioned: XRP | HBAR | ALGO | DAG | TAO | SOL | LINK | XDC | FLR | AVAX | CC

King Solomon (Ryan Solomon)

20,373 views • 5 months ago

The changes in the Algo and what Elon is truly trying to do - here is the full breakdown. A couple of Quick Points: - It all represents a really significant shift in what we’re about to see in our feed and the overall experience on X. - The shift from reply guy tactics to authenticity is where it’s all headed. - The value of a post will not be defined by engagement in its entirety but by the native value of the content. Current State: - Content visibility, including posts and replies, is currently unevenly prioritized, with manually written heuristics favoring recommendations to followers, benefitting large accounts but limiting the reach of smaller ones. - The "For You" algo heavily relies on these heuristics - impacting content reach and potentially hindering smaller accounts, regardless of content quality. Proposed Changes: - Algo defined value assignment to content will be driven by End-to-End Architecture based AI. - User-specific vectors, representing preferences, will guide content prioritization, providing a refreshed user experience within the feed that is inclusive and personalized. - The new approach will promote quality content across the entire user base, irrespective of account size. Additional Insights: - Elon emphasizes that AI will play a pivotal role in content importance assignment, suggesting a departure from the current manually-driven processes. - The algo will differentiate between content from accounts users follow (non-AI recommended) and those they don't (AI recommended), which should significantly improve the diversity of the content we’re exposed to. Implications: The proposed changes signify a fundamental transformation in how content is presented and recommended, with a move towards a more democratic and AI-driven system. Smaller accounts may benefit from increased visibility, creating a more level playing field based on content quality rather than follower count. Theories: - The mention of AI-differentiated recommendations for followed and non-followed content suggests a strategic effort to broaden user exposure to diverse content. - The shift towards an AI-powered recommendation system indicates a commitment to enhancing user experience by tailoring content suggestions based on individual preferences. What we’re looking at is a change that finally addresses the FOMO dynamic between accounts with reach and truly compelling content. It will be a major chance for new accounts, small accounts, and anyone really - to advance into the greater ecosphere they were left out of before. Goodbye, reply guy. Hello, value adding content. These conclusions are based on the recent interview of Elon Musk by Lex Fridman.

Adrian Dittmann

313,553 views • 2 years ago

Vitalik Buterin explains why proof-of-stake is more secure than proof-of-work “I think proof of stake is very secure because to attack the system, you need to have basically as much stake as the rest of the network. Right now, for example, we have 5 million ETH staking, which means you have to come up with 5 million ETH and then join the network.” At the time of this writing, more than 37 million ETH are being staked, with 3 million ETH waiting to join via the validator queue. At today’s prices, that’s more than $80 billion of ETH someone would have to acquire to attack the network and revert finalized blocks, which is more than the cost of attacking even the Bitcoin network by some estimates. The other defense mechanism that proof-of-stake has that proof-of-work doesn’t is slashing, which makes Ethereum antifragile. Vitalik explains: “Recovering from attacks is much easier in proof-of-stake than proof-of-work. For many kinds of attacks you do against [the Ethereum] network, we have this concept of automatic slashing. In order to revert a finalized block, you basically have to have a big portion of your validators sign two conflicting messages. This is something where once these messages are on the network, you can go and prove ‘these people did it.’ So we have this feature in the protocol where you basically take all these people who provably misbehaved and you burn their coins.” Vitalik also acknowledges the possibility of censoring attacks, where if 1/3rd of validators refuse to attest, the chain can’t finalize. But, as he explains, Ethereum has a contingency plan for this as well: “Everyone who got censored would create a minority chain, and the community would have to do a soft fork. The would have to say, ‘this chain is clearly attacking us and this one is not attacking us, so we’re going to join this chain.’ Then what happens is, on that new chain, the attackers also lose a lot of coins. The difference between proof-of-stake and proof-of-work is that in a proof-of-stake system, you can identify specific participants — and this isn’t a human going in and saying ‘I don’t like you’. It’s all automated.” One last benefit of proof-of-stake is that security scales with the value of the network. As Vitalik put it five years ago, it is really relative security, and not absolute security, that matters: “The security needs of a thing have to be proportional to the size of that thing, because as a thing gets bigger, its enemies become bigger and more well-motivated. If BTC were 100x as big as it is today, the value from destroying it would be 100x higher, and the kinds of actors that would want to care about destroying it would be much bigger and scarier. This is also why countries of all sizes have roughly similarly sized militaries as a percentage of GDP. Hence, cost of attack divided by market cap really is the correct statistic to measure, and in the long run issuance-free PoW really does look not that good." Source: Lex Fridman (Jun 2021)

Etherealize

101,954 views • 3 months ago

Pioneers, the Revolution Is in Our Hands! 🌏 We are living in a historic moment! Pi Network is not just another cryptocurrency – it is a global movement that can forever transform the world’s financial system. But for this to happen, we must act with intelligence, unity, and determination. We are millions of Pioneers across the planet, connected by a single ideal: building a decentralized, fair, and accessible future for all. No government, bank, or financial elite can dictate the value of Pi. We are the force driving this revolution! The True Value of Pi Is in Our Hands! The GCV of $314,159 is not just a number – it is a symbol of our vision, our confidence, and our mission. Pi is worth what we believe and make happen. If we want to see Pi shine, we must act now: Say NO to exchanges that try to manipulate Pi’s value! Withdraw and protect your coins. Refuse to sell your Pi for unfair prices! We determine its value. Use Pi in real transactions! The more we use it, the stronger it becomes. Spread the word, encourage others, make history! The more people believe, the more powerful it gets. Create scarcity! The harder it is to obtain Pi, the more valuable it will be. The World Is Watching – Let’s Show Them Our Strength! The early days of Bitcoin were filled with uncertainty. Many doubted it. Today, it is a global phenomenon! Now, we stand before an even greater moment: the birth of a cryptocurrency that is truly accessible to all. But Pi’s future will not be written by speculators. It will be written by US! The decision is in our hands. We can allow our dream to be manipulated, or we can change history and make Pi a global powerhouse! If every Pioneer acts with faith, strategy, and commitment, the GCV of $314,159 will not be a wish – it will be an undeniable reality! Together, we are unstoppable! The future is now! I am Sérgio Cruz, the Global GCV Ambassador from Portugal 🇵🇹

Doris Yin 东方紫莲🪷

17,716 views • 1 year ago