Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Bu video yüklenirken bir sorun oluştu. Bu geçici bir ağ sorunundan kaynaklanıyor olabilir veya video kullanılamıyor olabilir.

Ana Sayfaya Dön

iPhone 14 Pro Max Vs GALAXY S23 ULTRA Animations. Finally, Samsung matches iPhones in Animations Smoothness. OneUI 5.1 fixed microshutters lag in Animations. Decide yourself is Samsung beat Apple or they are almost same😉 #GalaxyS23Ultra #OneUI5dot1 #GalaxyS23

Tarun Vats

62,938 subscribers

485,758 görüntüleme • 3 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)

Bilim & Teknoloji Haberler & Politika Komedi #GalaxyS23Ultra #OneUI5dot1 #GalaxyS23

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

10 Yorum

Tarun Vats profil fotoğrafı

Tarun Vats3 yıl önce

Credits- YT Mr Android FHD

~ profil fotoğrafı

~3 yıl önce

Not quite IOS level of fluidity and smoothness but still a lot better than what they used to have

Ali-2022 profil fotoğrafı

Ali-20223 yıl önce

It’s 2023 and Samsung fans are still stuck at app opening and closing animation 😂 This is such a basic thing for a smartphone UX design but for some reason it’s a hot debate for samsung fans with every One UI version release lol

. profil fotoğrafı

.3 yıl önce

Nice scrolling lag still on Samsung, still can’t fix that. No where near iPhone

Joe Nuts profil fotoğrafı

Joe Nuts3 yıl önce

defenetly not, one ui home will never be smooth. compare this to a pixel and the iphone will still come out on top. no lag doesnt mean its smooth, samsungs animation just lacks movement

☄️Oishi☄️Rubiholic🕊️ profil fotoğrafı

☄️Oishi☄️Rubiholic🕊️3 yıl önce

Samsung is catching up. It has improved a lottt.. In fact s23 series are the best overall. Iphone is still the same what it was 3 years ago

I Hate Apple profil fotoğrafı

I Hate Apple3 yıl önce

Pixels still hold the top spot.

青いくん (Blue) profil fotoğrafı

青いくん (Blue)3 yıl önce

iOS and Pixel are still better tho, one ui's animation is still too simplistic despite having no lag. But still it is way better than whatever the hell happened in last gen, I really hope it got some animation overhaul in One UI 6

Pixelated profil fotoğrafı

Pixelated3 yıl önce

I feel like I hear this every year, only to go check it myself and realize One UI is still hot garbage.

Kota Sarat profil fotoğrafı

Kota Sarat3 yıl önce

Try it when the same Samsung device gets old and make a comparison video 😉

Benzer Videolar

Here we have the iPhone 13 at 60hz vs S23 Ultra at 120hz. Notice the S23 Ultra has smoother transitions but the animations are bad because of it being non-linear. There's a difference between refresh rate and animations. Sure iPhone looked smooth because of the animations, but the S23 Ultra had more frames in the animations because of the higher refresh rate. But then Samsung messed up with its linear animations. Hopefully, with one UI 6, we see the non-linear animations coupled with 120hz.

Here we have the iPhone 13 at 60hz vs S23 Ultra at 120hz. Notice the S23 Ultra has smoother transitions but the animations are bad because of it being non-linear. There's a difference between refresh rate and animations. Sure iPhone looked smooth because of the animations, but the S23 Ultra had more frames in the animations because of the higher refresh rate. But then Samsung messed up with its linear animations. Hopefully, with one UI 6, we see the non-linear animations coupled with 120hz.

Maaz Perwez

542,068 görüntüleme • 3 yıl önce

The craziest thing about The iPhone 17 Pro variable aperture camera is that Apple isn't the first to do this but Samsung, which released a dual aperture smartphone back when Galaxy S9 launched. Although dual aperture is not as advanced as variable aperture, the premise is the same. A smaller aperture allows for better photos during bright light while a bigger aperture allows for better pictures in low-light. For some odd reason, Samsung decided to skip on this feature entirely after the launch of galaxy S10 and every Galaxy smartphone released after it had a fixed aperture. Chances are that Samsung will follow Apple again and re-introduce this feature with their next Galaxy smartphones but I always found it quite odd that they got rid of it on the first place.

The craziest thing about The iPhone 17 Pro variable aperture camera is that Apple isn't the first to do this but Samsung, which released a dual aperture smartphone back when Galaxy S9 launched. Although dual aperture is not as advanced as variable aperture, the premise is the same. A smaller aperture allows for better photos during bright light while a bigger aperture allows for better pictures in low-light. For some odd reason, Samsung decided to skip on this feature entirely after the launch of galaxy S10 and every Galaxy smartphone released after it had a fixed aperture. Chances are that Samsung will follow Apple again and re-introduce this feature with their next Galaxy smartphones but I always found it quite odd that they got rid of it on the first place.

NikTek

65,480 görüntüleme • 17 gün önce

This Bada app, which is still under development, enables file sharing between non-iOS phones. Whether you are using an international Samsung model or a China version Samsung model, it can share files with OPPO, vivo, Xiaomi, Honor, and even Huawei HarmonyOS devices. In essence, Bada temporarily gives Android and HarmonyOS devices that do not have native Quick Share support a Quick Share-like file sharing capability. I tested it myself. After installing Bada on the Huawei Pura 90 Pro Max through ZhuoyiTong, it was able to transfer files with a Samsung phone successfully. The demo below shows file sharing between the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra and the Huawei Pura 90 Pro Max. The process is very convenient. Just select photos or videos in the gallery, choose Bada the same way you would use Samsung sharing, then tap confirm on the Huawei phone to receive the files. Of course, you can also easily share files with OPPO, vivo, Xiaomi, Honor, and other Android phones as well.

This Bada app, which is still under development, enables file sharing between non-iOS phones. Whether you are using an international Samsung model or a China version Samsung model, it can share files with OPPO, vivo, Xiaomi, Honor, and even Huawei HarmonyOS devices. In essence, Bada temporarily gives Android and HarmonyOS devices that do not have native Quick Share support a Quick Share-like file sharing capability. I tested it myself. After installing Bada on the Huawei Pura 90 Pro Max through ZhuoyiTong, it was able to transfer files with a Samsung phone successfully. The demo below shows file sharing between the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra and the Huawei Pura 90 Pro Max. The process is very convenient. Just select photos or videos in the gallery, choose Bada the same way you would use Samsung sharing, then tap confirm on the Huawei phone to receive the files. Of course, you can also easily share files with OPPO, vivo, Xiaomi, Honor, and other Android phones as well.

Ice Universe

58,517 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

In my last post, someone said the animations looked laggy 👀 Turns out… they were right but only on simulator. I’d been testing on Rork simulator + my own simulator the whole time → UI felt choppy. So I spent time optimizing animations with Opus 4.7. Then I built it on a real device (iPhone 17 Pro Max)… And damn, smooth af. Almost zero lag. Now the app is ~80% done. I’m already using it daily at the gym. Even had a few gym bros ask: “yo what app is that?” Feels like I’m already 50% there lol 🤟

In my last post, someone said the animations looked laggy 👀 Turns out… they were right but only on simulator. I’d been testing on Rork simulator + my own simulator the whole time → UI felt choppy. So I spent time optimizing animations with Opus 4.7. Then I built it on a real device (iPhone 17 Pro Max)… And damn, smooth af. Almost zero lag. Now the app is ~80% done. I’m already using it daily at the gym. Even had a few gym bros ask: “yo what app is that?” Feels like I’m already 50% there lol 🤟

Alex Nguyen

26,445 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

New Apple CEO John Ternus is expected to lead next week’s new iPhone announcement event Apple is expected to announce their “first foldable and a major pricing reset” - The new folding model is expected to start at about $2,400 - Pro models could go up by $200 or more - Apple is expected to sell 6.5 million folding models in the December quarter alone generating $14 billion in revenue $2,400 is an crazy starting price for a new iPhone… The current iPhone Pro Max starts at $1199, they are going to charge double the price for the new foldable Estimated manufacturing cost for the phone is around $760 per phone, so charging $2,400 for the base model is insane

New Apple CEO John Ternus is expected to lead next week’s new iPhone announcement event Apple is expected to announce their “first foldable and a major pricing reset” - The new folding model is expected to start at about $2,400 - Pro models could go up by $200 or more - Apple is expected to sell 6.5 million folding models in the December quarter alone generating $14 billion in revenue $2,400 is an crazy starting price for a new iPhone… The current iPhone Pro Max starts at $1199, they are going to charge double the price for the new foldable Estimated manufacturing cost for the phone is around $760 per phone, so charging $2,400 for the base model is insane

Wall Street Apes

62,601 görüntüleme • 21 gün önce

TM Roh, please take some time and actually use a Galaxy Z Fold 8. Let me explain why I’m saying this. This may seem like a tiny issue. It’s just an animation when opening and closing an album in Gallery. But what bothers me is what this tiny detail reveals: just how little Samsung’s software team seems to care about these parts of the user experience. I seriously wonder whether some of the executives responsible for this product, including TM Roh, have ever actually used the Galaxy Z Fold 8 as their primary phone. Because this problem is ridiculously easy to notice. You don’t need days of testing. Use the Z Fold 8 on its inner display for half an hour, open Gallery, tap an album cover, then go back. You’ll immediately see it: there is basically no proper transition animation. The interface simply switches from one screen to another. I have three levels of expectations for system animations: 1. Does an animation exist? 2. Does it look good? 3. Does it have originality and its own visual identity? If the animation looks bad, I can criticize the aesthetics. If it looks ordinary, I can say it lacks polish. But Samsung hasn’t even passed Level 1. And that becomes even more ridiculous when you compare it with other Android foldables. Galaxy Z Fold 8, Galaxy Z TriFold, OPPO Find N6, Xiaomi 18 Fold. They are all Android foldables dealing with the same basic challenges of large screens, multitasking and UI transitions. So why can OPPO do it? Why can Xiaomi do it? Why does Samsung continue to ignore something this basic, even on a foldable costing thousands of dollars? Is Samsung incapable of making these animations? Of course they can. They simply don’t seem to consider them important enough. Leave it unfinished and someone will defend Samsung anyway. Make the experience crude and someone will say, “It doesn’t affect functionality.” Sell the phone for $2,000 and people will still buy it. Over time, why would Samsung feel any urgency to polish these details? The feature works. Good enough. Animations? Whatever. Details? Whatever. Aesthetics? Whatever. Those little things users see, touch and feel hundreds of times every day? Apparently, whatever. But this is 2026. OPPO and Xiaomi are already putting serious effort into animation logic, visual continuity, interaction feedback and their own software aesthetics. If Samsung continues treating “the feature works” as the finish line, the gap in software experience will only become more obvious. And now the iPhone Duo has arrived. Samsung no longer gets to assume that people looking for a premium foldable will eventually come back to Galaxy because there is no serious alternative. That advantage cannot last forever. What makes this even more unfortunate is Samsung’s enormous influence on the Android market outside China. For many people, Galaxy is their primary window into high-end Android. When crude interactions like this remain unchanged for years, people gradually get used to them. They start thinking this is simply what Android is supposed to feel like, and that animation, visual continuity and software aesthetics don’t really matter. And many of the people who couldn’t tolerate it may have already moved to the iPhone. That is exactly why I keep talking about these seemingly “tiny” problems. User experience is built from hundreds of tiny details like these. So if you own a Galaxy Z Fold 8, try this right now. Unfold it. Open Gallery on the inner display. Tap an album cover. Then go back. Look at it yourself. Is this really the software experience you expect from a nearly $2,000 flagship foldable in 2026? Stop rationalizing every problem Samsung leaves unfinished. The more users defend every missing detail, the less reason Samsung has to improve it. It’s your money. You bought a flagship. You have every right to expect Samsung to get the basics right.

TM Roh, please take some time and actually use a Galaxy Z Fold 8. Let me explain why I’m saying this. This may seem like a tiny issue. It’s just an animation when opening and closing an album in Gallery. But what bothers me is what this tiny detail reveals: just how little Samsung’s software team seems to care about these parts of the user experience. I seriously wonder whether some of the executives responsible for this product, including TM Roh, have ever actually used the Galaxy Z Fold 8 as their primary phone. Because this problem is ridiculously easy to notice. You don’t need days of testing. Use the Z Fold 8 on its inner display for half an hour, open Gallery, tap an album cover, then go back. You’ll immediately see it: there is basically no proper transition animation. The interface simply switches from one screen to another. I have three levels of expectations for system animations: 1. Does an animation exist? 2. Does it look good? 3. Does it have originality and its own visual identity? If the animation looks bad, I can criticize the aesthetics. If it looks ordinary, I can say it lacks polish. But Samsung hasn’t even passed Level 1. And that becomes even more ridiculous when you compare it with other Android foldables. Galaxy Z Fold 8, Galaxy Z TriFold, OPPO Find N6, Xiaomi 18 Fold. They are all Android foldables dealing with the same basic challenges of large screens, multitasking and UI transitions. So why can OPPO do it? Why can Xiaomi do it? Why does Samsung continue to ignore something this basic, even on a foldable costing thousands of dollars? Is Samsung incapable of making these animations? Of course they can. They simply don’t seem to consider them important enough. Leave it unfinished and someone will defend Samsung anyway. Make the experience crude and someone will say, “It doesn’t affect functionality.” Sell the phone for $2,000 and people will still buy it. Over time, why would Samsung feel any urgency to polish these details? The feature works. Good enough. Animations? Whatever. Details? Whatever. Aesthetics? Whatever. Those little things users see, touch and feel hundreds of times every day? Apparently, whatever. But this is 2026. OPPO and Xiaomi are already putting serious effort into animation logic, visual continuity, interaction feedback and their own software aesthetics. If Samsung continues treating “the feature works” as the finish line, the gap in software experience will only become more obvious. And now the iPhone Duo has arrived. Samsung no longer gets to assume that people looking for a premium foldable will eventually come back to Galaxy because there is no serious alternative. That advantage cannot last forever. What makes this even more unfortunate is Samsung’s enormous influence on the Android market outside China. For many people, Galaxy is their primary window into high-end Android. When crude interactions like this remain unchanged for years, people gradually get used to them. They start thinking this is simply what Android is supposed to feel like, and that animation, visual continuity and software aesthetics don’t really matter. And many of the people who couldn’t tolerate it may have already moved to the iPhone. That is exactly why I keep talking about these seemingly “tiny” problems. User experience is built from hundreds of tiny details like these. So if you own a Galaxy Z Fold 8, try this right now. Unfold it. Open Gallery on the inner display. Tap an album cover. Then go back. Look at it yourself. Is this really the software experience you expect from a nearly $2,000 flagship foldable in 2026? Stop rationalizing every problem Samsung leaves unfinished. The more users defend every missing detail, the less reason Samsung has to improve it. It’s your money. You bought a flagship. You have every right to expect Samsung to get the basics right.

Ice Universe

96,541 görüntüleme • 1 gün önce

The video smooth zoom on the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is still the closest thing to a professional camcorder experience in the smartphone industry today. In fact, it’s even easier to control than the iPhone. On many other phones, video zooming requires constant finger movement and very precise control. The zoom speed can easily become inconsistent, suddenly speeding up or slowing down. Samsung works differently. You simply hold your finger at a certain position, and the phone continues zooming at a constant speed. The entire process feels extremely stable and linear. It genuinely resembles the powered zoom control of a professional video camera. This logic is fundamentally related to Samsung’s AI slow motion technology. They share the same core foundation: real time control over motion trajectories, speed transitions, and frame interpolation. What you’re seeing here was shot in very windy conditions using Samsung’s Pro Video mode, continuously zooming from 5x to 25x. Aside from some slight stutter during optical lens switching points, the continuous zoom transition within digital zoom ranges is arguably the closest thing to a professional camera currently available on a smartphone. So if the future Samsung Galaxy S27 Ultra really removes the 3x telephoto camera, it could actually improve the video zoom experience further. Fewer optical switching points would theoretically reduce transition jumps and stutters, making the entire zoom range feel even more natural and continuous.

The video smooth zoom on the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is still the closest thing to a professional camcorder experience in the smartphone industry today. In fact, it’s even easier to control than the iPhone. On many other phones, video zooming requires constant finger movement and very precise control. The zoom speed can easily become inconsistent, suddenly speeding up or slowing down. Samsung works differently. You simply hold your finger at a certain position, and the phone continues zooming at a constant speed. The entire process feels extremely stable and linear. It genuinely resembles the powered zoom control of a professional video camera. This logic is fundamentally related to Samsung’s AI slow motion technology. They share the same core foundation: real time control over motion trajectories, speed transitions, and frame interpolation. What you’re seeing here was shot in very windy conditions using Samsung’s Pro Video mode, continuously zooming from 5x to 25x. Aside from some slight stutter during optical lens switching points, the continuous zoom transition within digital zoom ranges is arguably the closest thing to a professional camera currently available on a smartphone. So if the future Samsung Galaxy S27 Ultra really removes the 3x telephoto camera, it could actually improve the video zoom experience further. Fewer optical switching points would theoretically reduce transition jumps and stutters, making the entire zoom range feel even more natural and continuous.

Ice Universe

27,250 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

I wonder how long the people are gonna shamelessly defend Samsung all over :] The Galaxy S26 Ultra, which costs about 1500$ for the 512GB variant, might probably be the MOST EXPENSIVE Android in the 2026 as well... yet it can't even run the well optimized mainstream games on 60FPS for just 01 MINUTE... like for real man!‽ 😂 In the recent post where I posted the poor performance of S26 Ultra foe Wuthering Waves, people blamed the game... so here some gameplay test results from your so-called "MOST PERFECT, MOST OPTIMIZED" Hoyo games 🙂‍↕️ The FPS drops to avg 44-47 while just walking around in Genshin Impact after just playing for 4 or 6 minutes. The device completely crashes while playing Zenless Zone Zero at max settings and the FPS even drops to 27 during heavy combat... not in a long gaming session but it was a result of a 15min gameplay test 🥀 Now as for Wuthering Waves, yet it is the most hungry game among the mainstreams, yet the game is also getting slightly better at performance with each new patch update (not major version updates) While devices like IQOO 15 and POCO F8 Ultra with the same Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 are able to run the game for locked 60FPS for atleast 6mins, at the same session the S26 Ultra can't even reach 53FPS and the minimum it reaches during overworld battles is just 11FPS... crazy isn't it? 😂 Having a 200mp ai assisted camera and a so-called privacy display doesn't mean it's the best and has to be 1800$ while it can't even compete with a 450$ Chinese midrange smartphone at performance. Therefore now I guess why the Americans glaze with their IPhones over Samsung... welp, I've been also a Samsung user for 5 years and I still use one, but I don't think there's any of the devices that are more worthless than the S26 Ultra at its price point 😅 The only thing where Samsung is unbeatable might probably the official ui design and the customization features... which their devices are never made for gaming, but still their older devices delivered way more balanced performance at release. #WutheringWaves #WuWa #鳴潮 #WuWaCollection #WuWaAnniversary #GenshinImpact #Genshin #原神 #ZenlessZoneZero #アリア #ZZZ #SamsungGalaxyS26Ultra #zzzero

I wonder how long the people are gonna shamelessly defend Samsung all over :] The Galaxy S26 Ultra, which costs about 1500$ for the 512GB variant, might probably be the MOST EXPENSIVE Android in the 2026 as well... yet it can't even run the well optimized mainstream games on 60FPS for just 01 MINUTE... like for real man!‽ 😂 In the recent post where I posted the poor performance of S26 Ultra foe Wuthering Waves, people blamed the game... so here some gameplay test results from your so-called "MOST PERFECT, MOST OPTIMIZED" Hoyo games 🙂‍↕️ The FPS drops to avg 44-47 while just walking around in Genshin Impact after just playing for 4 or 6 minutes. The device completely crashes while playing Zenless Zone Zero at max settings and the FPS even drops to 27 during heavy combat... not in a long gaming session but it was a result of a 15min gameplay test 🥀 Now as for Wuthering Waves, yet it is the most hungry game among the mainstreams, yet the game is also getting slightly better at performance with each new patch update (not major version updates) While devices like IQOO 15 and POCO F8 Ultra with the same Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 are able to run the game for locked 60FPS for atleast 6mins, at the same session the S26 Ultra can't even reach 53FPS and the minimum it reaches during overworld battles is just 11FPS... crazy isn't it? 😂 Having a 200mp ai assisted camera and a so-called privacy display doesn't mean it's the best and has to be 1800$ while it can't even compete with a 450$ Chinese midrange smartphone at performance. Therefore now I guess why the Americans glaze with their IPhones over Samsung... welp, I've been also a Samsung user for 5 years and I still use one, but I don't think there's any of the devices that are more worthless than the S26 Ultra at its price point 😅 The only thing where Samsung is unbeatable might probably the official ui design and the customization features... which their devices are never made for gaming, but still their older devices delivered way more balanced performance at release. #WutheringWaves #WuWa #鳴潮 #WuWaCollection #WuWaAnniversary #GenshinImpact #Genshin #原神 #ZenlessZoneZero #アリア #ZZZ #SamsungGalaxyS26Ultra #zzzero

WuWa Timeline

86,998 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

Something feels seriously off with Claude Fable 5.1 🙄 I recreated the exact same 3D stadium I had built with Fable 5 just to see how much better 5.1 would be. Instead, Fable 5.1 took more than > 1 hour and hit the max limit 2 or 3 times on a single prompt. Fable 5 basically had the whole website ready in one shot and its output was actually much better. Fable 5.1 felt good with metal but added these weird black things that look like basket wings... genuinely have no idea what those are. Not good. And this observation isn’t just for one website. I saw similar behavior with a much simpler hero page where Fable 5.1 maxed out on a single prompt, something I never really experienced with Fable 5 for similar other websites Also, 3D models and animations of that other website also looked noticeably worse compared to what Fable 5 used to produce. In fact, they were even worse than what I’ve seen Opus 5 do. I’ll keep testing it, but so far Fable 5.1 feels less like an upgrade and more like a regression to me, tbh.

Something feels seriously off with Claude Fable 5.1 🙄 I recreated the exact same 3D stadium I had built with Fable 5 just to see how much better 5.1 would be. Instead, Fable 5.1 took more than > 1 hour and hit the max limit 2 or 3 times on a single prompt. Fable 5 basically had the whole website ready in one shot and its output was actually much better. Fable 5.1 felt good with metal but added these weird black things that look like basket wings... genuinely have no idea what those are. Not good. And this observation isn’t just for one website. I saw similar behavior with a much simpler hero page where Fable 5.1 maxed out on a single prompt, something I never really experienced with Fable 5 for similar other websites Also, 3D models and animations of that other website also looked noticeably worse compared to what Fable 5 used to produce. In fact, they were even worse than what I’ve seen Opus 5 do. I’ll keep testing it, but so far Fable 5.1 feels less like an upgrade and more like a regression to me, tbh.

The Bugged Dev

99,417 görüntüleme • 24 gün önce

With Tim Cook stepping down, most people are talking about the iPhone, the App Store, and the stock price. But there is one move he made that almost nobody talks about and it is the single biggest reason iPhone crushed its competition in the early years. In 2005, two years before the iPhone launched, Cook made a bet. Flash storage was still relatively rare at the time and smartphones didn't exist yet. But Cook saw what was coming, a future where mobile devices would all need flash memory and he knew that if that future arrived without Apple having locked up supply, they'd be fighting for components against every phone maker on earth. So he prepaid $1.25B to suppliers including Samsung and Hynix to corner the market on NAND flash memory through 2010. The contract had a catch, suppliers had to prioritize Apple's orders over everyone else's. This was a massive gamble and if the iPhone flopped, Apple was still on the hook for the full purchase commitment. The iPhone did not flop. It went on to sell tens of millions of units in its first two years with zero supply chain slowdowns. And while Apple scaled freely, competitors couldn't get the components they needed to build a credible response. They were literally locked out of the supply chain. The move was so effective that Cook ran the same playbook across the business. He bought $100 million of holiday season air freight capacity in advance, months before competitors thought to book it, leaving rivals scrambling to ship products during the most critical sales window of the year. He cut Apple's component suppliers from 100 down to 24 and slashed inventory turnover time from 30 days to 6 days within his first seven months at the company. By 2012, Apple was turning over its inventory every 5 day, Dell took 10, Samsung took 21. Jobs is credited as the product visionary but Cook was the supply chain visionary and in the early smartphone wars, the supply chain was the moat.

With Tim Cook stepping down, most people are talking about the iPhone, the App Store, and the stock price. But there is one move he made that almost nobody talks about and it is the single biggest reason iPhone crushed its competition in the early years. In 2005, two years before the iPhone launched, Cook made a bet. Flash storage was still relatively rare at the time and smartphones didn't exist yet. But Cook saw what was coming, a future where mobile devices would all need flash memory and he knew that if that future arrived without Apple having locked up supply, they'd be fighting for components against every phone maker on earth. So he prepaid $1.25B to suppliers including Samsung and Hynix to corner the market on NAND flash memory through 2010. The contract had a catch, suppliers had to prioritize Apple's orders over everyone else's. This was a massive gamble and if the iPhone flopped, Apple was still on the hook for the full purchase commitment. The iPhone did not flop. It went on to sell tens of millions of units in its first two years with zero supply chain slowdowns. And while Apple scaled freely, competitors couldn't get the components they needed to build a credible response. They were literally locked out of the supply chain. The move was so effective that Cook ran the same playbook across the business. He bought $100 million of holiday season air freight capacity in advance, months before competitors thought to book it, leaving rivals scrambling to ship products during the most critical sales window of the year. He cut Apple's component suppliers from 100 down to 24 and slashed inventory turnover time from 30 days to 6 days within his first seven months at the company. By 2012, Apple was turning over its inventory every 5 day, Dell took 10, Samsung took 21. Jobs is credited as the product visionary but Cook was the supply chain visionary and in the early smartphone wars, the supply chain was the moat.

Milk Road AI

78,952 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

My issues with Starfield so far 34 hours in: (Video is of a ship taking off from the planet as i boarded) - Lack of Vehicles is beyond apparent, genuinely a mind boggling decision that needs to be fixed in a DLC/Update, Jet packs are not fast enough. - Carry Weight needs to be increased, it's stupidly low even with max Weight Lifting skill - Loading screens when travelling in space are really dumb, they should've been hidden using scenes or smth - Too many loading screens in certain cities (Neon, Cyodnia) - I feel like I'm constantly out of ammo (playing on hard) - the inventory screen sucks, I already modded this one out with StarUI but it needs to be changed officially - Faces look sometimes really great and sometimes really bad, Needs more consistency - Some animals feel really bullet spongey - Smallest nitpick possible, the sit-down/stand up animations are too slow

My issues with Starfield so far 34 hours in: (Video is of a ship taking off from the planet as i boarded) - Lack of Vehicles is beyond apparent, genuinely a mind boggling decision that needs to be fixed in a DLC/Update, Jet packs are not fast enough. - Carry Weight needs to be increased, it's stupidly low even with max Weight Lifting skill - Loading screens when travelling in space are really dumb, they should've been hidden using scenes or smth - Too many loading screens in certain cities (Neon, Cyodnia) - I feel like I'm constantly out of ammo (playing on hard) - the inventory screen sucks, I already modded this one out with StarUI but it needs to be changed officially - Faces look sometimes really great and sometimes really bad, Needs more consistency - Some animals feel really bullet spongey - Smallest nitpick possible, the sit-down/stand up animations are too slow

Synth Potato🥔

1,773,244 görüntüleme • 3 yıl önce

A lot of people are accusing me of deliberately disabling system animations to make Samsung look like it has no animations. This is honestly ridiculous. My video already showed the exact issue very clearly: I was tapping on album covers in the Gallery to open individual albums. I was NOT tapping on individual photos. These are two completely different actions. Since some people still somehow missed this, I recorded another video to demonstrate everything from the beginning. First, I show my Developer Options. I haven't changed any animation-related settings, and I haven't disabled system animations. Then I open the Gallery. 1. Tap an album cover to enter an album Watch carefully. On the inner display of the Galaxy Z Fold 8, when you open an album from the Gallery and then go back, there is basically no proper transition animation. The UI simply switches from one screen to another. 2. Open an album, then tap an individual photo Now you can clearly see that there IS an animation. It may still look pretty silly to me, but at least an animation exists. So please stop using “there's an animation when you open a photo” as an argument against what I showed. From the very beginning, I have been talking about the animation when tapping an album cover, not when opening an individual photo. I've also confirmed that this issue appears on the inner displays of the Galaxy Z Fold 8 and Galaxy Z Trifold. The outer displays and the Galaxy S series do not have the same issue. So, to make this absolutely clear: Album cover → Open album: no proper transition animation on the inner display. Inside album → Open individual photo: animation exists. Please follow the exact same steps shown in my video before arguing that the issue doesn't exist. If this still isn't clear enough, I genuinely don't know how I could demonstrate it any more clearly.

A lot of people are accusing me of deliberately disabling system animations to make Samsung look like it has no animations. This is honestly ridiculous. My video already showed the exact issue very clearly: I was tapping on album covers in the Gallery to open individual albums. I was NOT tapping on individual photos. These are two completely different actions. Since some people still somehow missed this, I recorded another video to demonstrate everything from the beginning. First, I show my Developer Options. I haven't changed any animation-related settings, and I haven't disabled system animations. Then I open the Gallery. 1. Tap an album cover to enter an album Watch carefully. On the inner display of the Galaxy Z Fold 8, when you open an album from the Gallery and then go back, there is basically no proper transition animation. The UI simply switches from one screen to another. 2. Open an album, then tap an individual photo Now you can clearly see that there IS an animation. It may still look pretty silly to me, but at least an animation exists. So please stop using “there's an animation when you open a photo” as an argument against what I showed. From the very beginning, I have been talking about the animation when tapping an album cover, not when opening an individual photo. I've also confirmed that this issue appears on the inner displays of the Galaxy Z Fold 8 and Galaxy Z Trifold. The outer displays and the Galaxy S series do not have the same issue. So, to make this absolutely clear: Album cover → Open album: no proper transition animation on the inner display. Inside album → Open individual photo: animation exists. Please follow the exact same steps shown in my video before arguing that the issue doesn't exist. If this still isn't clear enough, I genuinely don't know how I could demonstrate it any more clearly.

Ice Universe

45,069 görüntüleme • 1 gün önce

Dear Mentee High School students who are going to University, please pay attention to this! If you have a child going to varsity, interpret this for him! If you stop being innovative, someone hungrier than you is going to take your core business and make it a freebie. Wangu always evolve and be consistently creative! I love things😍, now listen…. I bought my self 2 Iphone 15 pros, one is a pro and the other one is a pro-max…Are they different in anyway, mmm not at all, jus different in sizes☺️. I learnt that iPhone made use of the NFC function impressively, Notice….if 2 iPhones 15ns ( or any updated iphone 📱 with the latest Update of IOS 17) are placed together, they exchange contacts on their own instantly!!… this means death to business of printing cards😥, in few years digitalization would have taken over, big question? Is your business safe, and will you be relevant in the coming years ? Let me take you back in the day… Innovation messed up Kodak company for good, it really played a significant role in the contrasting fate of Kodak and Nokia. While Kodak was a pioneer in traditional photography, they failed to capitalize on the digital revolution and neglected to adapt to a changing market. On the other hand, Nokia recognized the potential of combining a phone with a camera and successfully introduced this innovative feature. Nokia was done the same by SAMSUNG! Be innovative or you go home empty handed!! The ability to innovate and embrace new technologies is crucial for companies to remain relevant and competitive in evolving industries. Other examples of innovation-driven success include Apple's revolutionary iPhone, which transformed the mobile industry🔥🔥🔥📱, and Tesla's disruptive approach to electric vehicles. Imagine you are a Fighter pilot, the truth is your job ain’t safe with the intro of fighter drones. People are now going to war in the comfort of their homes! Rapid advancements in creative technology and innovation are reshaping many industries, and certain professions are at risk of becoming obsolete. University students, avoid these degrees and professions, they are being replaced😢 1) Telemarketers, automated systems and AI chatbots are handling customer queries efficiently. Heheee I did customer service, wangu your job is not safe! 2) Bank tellers, online banking and self-service kiosks is reducing the need for manual transactions. Banking is necessary but banks are not !! 3) Print journalists, with the rise of digital media and online news platforms, ma journalist hakusisina chenyu uku, print media ma1 atanga. 4) Cashiers, self-checkout systems are becoming more prevalent, ma cashiers will def not be needed! 5) Taxi and truck drivers, autonomous vehicles are gaining traction. Kuma gonyeti chachaya… 6) Travel agents, did you notice how individuals now have access to online booking platforms. Soon there wont be need for them😢 7) Factory workers, automation and robotics are advancing. 😎 Data entry clerks basa rakupera, as machine learning algorithms can now interpret and input data more accurately. Hameno Jehova. 9) Retail employees, e-commerce is continuing to grow, retail employees will be replaced trust me 10) Customer service representatives, AI-powered chatbots and virtual assistants are now handling customer inquiries efficiently. Ma1 kani While these changes may result in job displacement, they also create opportunities for individuals to acquire NEW SKILLS and adapt to emerging professions. What you are doing now, will determine who you will be in the next 5 years !! Mentor The CEO Mudiwa Hood

Dear Mentee High School students who are going to University, please pay attention to this! If you have a child going to varsity, interpret this for him! If you stop being innovative, someone hungrier than you is going to take your core business and make it a freebie. Wangu always evolve and be consistently creative! I love things😍, now listen…. I bought my self 2 Iphone 15 pros, one is a pro and the other one is a pro-max…Are they different in anyway, mmm not at all, jus different in sizes☺️. I learnt that iPhone made use of the NFC function impressively, Notice….if 2 iPhones 15ns ( or any updated iphone 📱 with the latest Update of IOS 17) are placed together, they exchange contacts on their own instantly!!… this means death to business of printing cards😥, in few years digitalization would have taken over, big question? Is your business safe, and will you be relevant in the coming years ? Let me take you back in the day… Innovation messed up Kodak company for good, it really played a significant role in the contrasting fate of Kodak and Nokia. While Kodak was a pioneer in traditional photography, they failed to capitalize on the digital revolution and neglected to adapt to a changing market. On the other hand, Nokia recognized the potential of combining a phone with a camera and successfully introduced this innovative feature. Nokia was done the same by SAMSUNG! Be innovative or you go home empty handed!! The ability to innovate and embrace new technologies is crucial for companies to remain relevant and competitive in evolving industries. Other examples of innovation-driven success include Apple's revolutionary iPhone, which transformed the mobile industry🔥🔥🔥📱, and Tesla's disruptive approach to electric vehicles. Imagine you are a Fighter pilot, the truth is your job ain’t safe with the intro of fighter drones. People are now going to war in the comfort of their homes! Rapid advancements in creative technology and innovation are reshaping many industries, and certain professions are at risk of becoming obsolete. University students, avoid these degrees and professions, they are being replaced😢 1) Telemarketers, automated systems and AI chatbots are handling customer queries efficiently. Heheee I did customer service, wangu your job is not safe! 2) Bank tellers, online banking and self-service kiosks is reducing the need for manual transactions. Banking is necessary but banks are not !! 3) Print journalists, with the rise of digital media and online news platforms, ma journalist hakusisina chenyu uku, print media ma1 atanga. 4) Cashiers, self-checkout systems are becoming more prevalent, ma cashiers will def not be needed! 5) Taxi and truck drivers, autonomous vehicles are gaining traction. Kuma gonyeti chachaya… 6) Travel agents, did you notice how individuals now have access to online booking platforms. Soon there wont be need for them😢 7) Factory workers, automation and robotics are advancing. 😎 Data entry clerks basa rakupera, as machine learning algorithms can now interpret and input data more accurately. Hameno Jehova. 9) Retail employees, e-commerce is continuing to grow, retail employees will be replaced trust me 10) Customer service representatives, AI-powered chatbots and virtual assistants are now handling customer inquiries efficiently. Ma1 kani While these changes may result in job displacement, they also create opportunities for individuals to acquire NEW SKILLS and adapt to emerging professions. What you are doing now, will determine who you will be in the next 5 years !! Mentor The CEO Mudiwa Hood

MUDIWA

30,395 görüntüleme • 3 yıl önce

CSS Trick 🍏 You can create that Apple-style blowout text effect with CSS scroll animations and fixed positioning ⚡️ .word { animation: blowout; animation-timeline: --section; } @keyframes blowout { 0%, 95% { background: transparent; } to { transform: translateZ(99vh); background: #000; } } The trick here is to fix the position of some things in your layout and then animate them based on their non-fixed containers ⭐️ The .word is position: fixed within a that has a height of 200vh section { view-timeline: --section; } section:first-of-type { height: 200vh; } Every section has a view-timeline: --section that creates a scoped ViewTimeline for each section's children 🤙 As that first section scrolls out of view, you increase its opacity and move it on the z-axis towards you. That gives it the impression of scaling up 🆙 .word { animation: blowout, fade-in; animation-timing-function: ease-in; animation-fill-mode: both; animation-timeline: --section; animation-range: exit-crossing 10% exit 0%; } You can use the exit-crossing range combined with the exit range to get a timing you like ✨ Definitely experiment with these ranges to see how they play. The timing function creates interesting effects too! At the same time as the text scales up, you need to fade in the video and the text that goes with it. Again, you can use the parent container's ViewTimeline --section p, video { animation: fade-in, fade-out; animation-timing-function: ease-in; animation-fill-mode: both; animation-timeline: --section; } p { animation-range: entry 10% entry 35%, exit 0% exit 25%; } video { animation-range: entry 0% entry 25%, exit 10% exit 35%; } The timings are slightly different here. Again, you can play with them to get something that feels right for you! @keyframes fade-in { to { opacity: 1; }} @keyframes fade-out { to { opacity: 0; }} Theoretically, you should be able to do something with animation-direction: reverse/alternate like yesterday's demo video { animation: fade 2 both linear alternate-reverse; } The trick with this effect is all about timing and creating containers that are bigger than the content and using them to drive the animations 🏎️ The scroll-driven signature is a bonus! ✍️ Perhaps a follow-up on that one 🤙 As always, any questions, requests, etc. Hit me up! With this demo, the GreenSock ScrollTrigger code is included where the CSS scroll-driven animations API is not supported 🙌 That means you could use this demo today! CodePen.IO link below! 👇

CSS Trick 🍏 You can create that Apple-style blowout text effect with CSS scroll animations and fixed positioning ⚡️ .word { animation: blowout; animation-timeline: --section; } @keyframes blowout { 0%, 95% { background: transparent; } to { transform: translateZ(99vh); background: #000; } } The trick here is to fix the position of some things in your layout and then animate them based on their non-fixed containers ⭐️ The .word is position: fixed within a that has a height of 200vh section { view-timeline: --section; } section:first-of-type { height: 200vh; } Every section has a view-timeline: --section that creates a scoped ViewTimeline for each section's children 🤙 As that first section scrolls out of view, you increase its opacity and move it on the z-axis towards you. That gives it the impression of scaling up 🆙 .word { animation: blowout, fade-in; animation-timing-function: ease-in; animation-fill-mode: both; animation-timeline: --section; animation-range: exit-crossing 10% exit 0%; } You can use the exit-crossing range combined with the exit range to get a timing you like ✨ Definitely experiment with these ranges to see how they play. The timing function creates interesting effects too! At the same time as the text scales up, you need to fade in the video and the text that goes with it. Again, you can use the parent container's ViewTimeline --section p, video { animation: fade-in, fade-out; animation-timing-function: ease-in; animation-fill-mode: both; animation-timeline: --section; } p { animation-range: entry 10% entry 35%, exit 0% exit 25%; } video { animation-range: entry 0% entry 25%, exit 10% exit 35%; } The timings are slightly different here. Again, you can play with them to get something that feels right for you! @keyframes fade-in { to { opacity: 1; }} @keyframes fade-out { to { opacity: 0; }} Theoretically, you should be able to do something with animation-direction: reverse/alternate like yesterday's demo video { animation: fade 2 both linear alternate-reverse; } The trick with this effect is all about timing and creating containers that are bigger than the content and using them to drive the animations 🏎️ The scroll-driven signature is a bonus! ✍️ Perhaps a follow-up on that one 🤙 As always, any questions, requests, etc. Hit me up! With this demo, the GreenSock ScrollTrigger code is included where the CSS scroll-driven animations API is not supported 🙌 That means you could use this demo today! CodePen.IO link below! 👇

jhey ʕ•ᴥ•ʔ

270,144 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

The Galaxy S26 Ultra display looks like absolute garbage next to the iQOO 16. Honestly, it looks like shit. The S26 Ultra uses M14 OLED, while the iQOO 16 has moved on to the newer M16 OLED, so the latter already has an advantage at the panel level. But the real disaster is Samsung’s privacy display design. Look at this comparison. The moment you tilt the S26 Ultra, the woman’s skin tone starts turning yellow and green. At wider angles, she almost looks like a ghost. Meanwhile, the iQOO 16 keeps her skin tone remarkably accurate, with excellent clarity and color consistency even from extreme angles. And please pay attention to this: I did NOT enable Privacy Display. This is the S26 Ultra in its normal display mode. The privacy feature is completely off, yet the viewing angles are already this bad. That means even if you never use Privacy Display at all, you still have to live with the side effects of this optical structure every single day. Tilt the phone a little and colors shift. Skin tones collapse. A flagship display that cannot even maintain basic color consistency at normal viewing angles is simply unacceptable. The first thing I checked after getting the iQOO 16 was its viewing angle performance, because this issue matters a lot to me. And honestly, I was so happy. This finally feels like a proper flagship OLED again. Then I looked back at my S26 Ultra and almost wanted to cry. Samsung has some of the best OLED technology in the world, and M14 OLED itself is perfectly capable of looking excellent. Yet Samsung sacrificed viewing angles, transparency, and color consistency for a privacy feature that most people will only use occasionally. Ruining hours of daily viewing quality for a feature you may need for a few minutes is absurd. I really hope other smartphone brands do not blindly copy this trend. Privacy protection can be achieved with software, accessories, or other solutions. Do not destroy the fundamentals of a great display for it. And this is exactly why I am already worried about the S27 Ultra. Even if Samsung upgrades it to M16 OLED, if it keeps the same privacy display structure, I do not expect it to match the clean, transparent, and consistent color performance of the iQOO 16. A great display should first get the basics right: accurate color, clarity, and viewing angles. If a normal human face turns yellow green the moment you tilt the phone, no advanced OLED material can save it.

The Galaxy S26 Ultra display looks like absolute garbage next to the iQOO 16. Honestly, it looks like shit. The S26 Ultra uses M14 OLED, while the iQOO 16 has moved on to the newer M16 OLED, so the latter already has an advantage at the panel level. But the real disaster is Samsung’s privacy display design. Look at this comparison. The moment you tilt the S26 Ultra, the woman’s skin tone starts turning yellow and green. At wider angles, she almost looks like a ghost. Meanwhile, the iQOO 16 keeps her skin tone remarkably accurate, with excellent clarity and color consistency even from extreme angles. And please pay attention to this: I did NOT enable Privacy Display. This is the S26 Ultra in its normal display mode. The privacy feature is completely off, yet the viewing angles are already this bad. That means even if you never use Privacy Display at all, you still have to live with the side effects of this optical structure every single day. Tilt the phone a little and colors shift. Skin tones collapse. A flagship display that cannot even maintain basic color consistency at normal viewing angles is simply unacceptable. The first thing I checked after getting the iQOO 16 was its viewing angle performance, because this issue matters a lot to me. And honestly, I was so happy. This finally feels like a proper flagship OLED again. Then I looked back at my S26 Ultra and almost wanted to cry. Samsung has some of the best OLED technology in the world, and M14 OLED itself is perfectly capable of looking excellent. Yet Samsung sacrificed viewing angles, transparency, and color consistency for a privacy feature that most people will only use occasionally. Ruining hours of daily viewing quality for a feature you may need for a few minutes is absurd. I really hope other smartphone brands do not blindly copy this trend. Privacy protection can be achieved with software, accessories, or other solutions. Do not destroy the fundamentals of a great display for it. And this is exactly why I am already worried about the S27 Ultra. Even if Samsung upgrades it to M16 OLED, if it keeps the same privacy display structure, I do not expect it to match the clean, transparent, and consistent color performance of the iQOO 16. A great display should first get the basics right: accurate color, clarity, and viewing angles. If a normal human face turns yellow green the moment you tilt the phone, no advanced OLED material can save it.

Ice Universe

377,229 görüntüleme • 11 gün önce

Google just STOLE Apple away from OpenAI... And it might decide who wins the AI race. Apple announced a multi-year $1 billion deal with Google to power the next generation of Siri using Gemini AI. Not ChatGPT. Gemini. This is the same Apple that 18 months ago announced a partnership with OpenAI to integrate ChatGPT into iPhones. Everyone thought that meant OpenAI won. Turns out it was an audition. And OpenAI failed. Here's why: June 2024: Apple announces OpenAI partnership. Sam Altman tweets: "very happy to be partnering with apple." Media declares OpenAI the winner of the AI race. December 2025: Sam Altman issues "code red" at OpenAI. Tells everyone to pause everything and ship ChatGPT 5.2 faster. Why the panic? Google released Gemini 3 and it was actually good. January 2026: Apple picks Google. ChatGPT stays as an "optional feature" for complicated queries. But Gemini becomes the DEFAULT intelligence layer for 2 billion Apple devices. The financial reality: Apple pays OpenAI $0 But Apple pays Google $1 BILLION per year That's a verdict. The excuse OpenAI gave for why they did it for free was "exposure to millions of iPhone users." Which basically means "we couldn't negotiate worth shit." Meanwhile Google walked away with both the money AND the distribution. Why Google won: Infrastructure ownership. OpenAI runs on Microsoft's Azure cloud. That creates a dependency chain: Apple → OpenAI → Microsoft. 3 companies. 3 points of failure. Google owns its entire stack. One relationship. Zero middlemen. Apple's statement said Google's technology provides "the most capable foundation." Not "most innovative." Not "best partner." Most CAPABLE. In other words, OpenAI's tech couldn't handle the scale. The Alphabet boost: Google's stock hit $4 trillion market cap after the announcement. Up 65% in 2024 on AI momentum alone. This deal validates Google's pivot from "search company" to "AI infrastructure company." Now they power Samsung's Galaxy AI AND Apple's Siri. Billions of mobile devices running on Gemini. OpenAI's big problem here: Still no profit. Ever. Anthropic is stealing enterprise customers. DeepSeek launched a price war forcing ChatGPT to cut prices. GPT-5 was overhyped and underwhelming. Circular financing deals are getting scrutinized. And now Apple just downgraded them from partner to backup option. That "code red" in December? Too little, too late. The reality everyone's missing: This isn't about chatbot quality. It's about who owns the infrastructure to power billions of devices. Google proved it with Samsung. Now Apple. OpenAI proved it can build a viral product but can't scale it profitably. Very different skill sets. Elon called it "unreasonable concentration of power for Google." He's right. But that's exactly why Apple chose them. Apple doesn't want a startup partner. They want a utility provider. Google is now the default AI for Android AND iOS. OpenAI is relegated to opt-in queries for people who specifically request ChatGPT. That's the difference between infrastructure and feature. The next 12 months: Apple launches Gemini-powered Siri in spring 2026. If it works, every iPhone user defaults to Google's AI. ChatGPT becomes the thing people use when Siri can't answer. The backup plan. My takeaway for entrepreneurs watching this: Distribution beats innovation. Google didn't necessarily build a better chatbot. They built better infrastructure and negotiated better terms. OpenAI won the hype race. Google won the business war. What do you think can save OpenAI now?

Google just STOLE Apple away from OpenAI... And it might decide who wins the AI race. Apple announced a multi-year $1 billion deal with Google to power the next generation of Siri using Gemini AI. Not ChatGPT. Gemini. This is the same Apple that 18 months ago announced a partnership with OpenAI to integrate ChatGPT into iPhones. Everyone thought that meant OpenAI won. Turns out it was an audition. And OpenAI failed. Here's why: June 2024: Apple announces OpenAI partnership. Sam Altman tweets: "very happy to be partnering with apple." Media declares OpenAI the winner of the AI race. December 2025: Sam Altman issues "code red" at OpenAI. Tells everyone to pause everything and ship ChatGPT 5.2 faster. Why the panic? Google released Gemini 3 and it was actually good. January 2026: Apple picks Google. ChatGPT stays as an "optional feature" for complicated queries. But Gemini becomes the DEFAULT intelligence layer for 2 billion Apple devices. The financial reality: Apple pays OpenAI $0 But Apple pays Google $1 BILLION per year That's a verdict. The excuse OpenAI gave for why they did it for free was "exposure to millions of iPhone users." Which basically means "we couldn't negotiate worth shit." Meanwhile Google walked away with both the money AND the distribution. Why Google won: Infrastructure ownership. OpenAI runs on Microsoft's Azure cloud. That creates a dependency chain: Apple → OpenAI → Microsoft. 3 companies. 3 points of failure. Google owns its entire stack. One relationship. Zero middlemen. Apple's statement said Google's technology provides "the most capable foundation." Not "most innovative." Not "best partner." Most CAPABLE. In other words, OpenAI's tech couldn't handle the scale. The Alphabet boost: Google's stock hit $4 trillion market cap after the announcement. Up 65% in 2024 on AI momentum alone. This deal validates Google's pivot from "search company" to "AI infrastructure company." Now they power Samsung's Galaxy AI AND Apple's Siri. Billions of mobile devices running on Gemini. OpenAI's big problem here: Still no profit. Ever. Anthropic is stealing enterprise customers. DeepSeek launched a price war forcing ChatGPT to cut prices. GPT-5 was overhyped and underwhelming. Circular financing deals are getting scrutinized. And now Apple just downgraded them from partner to backup option. That "code red" in December? Too little, too late. The reality everyone's missing: This isn't about chatbot quality. It's about who owns the infrastructure to power billions of devices. Google proved it with Samsung. Now Apple. OpenAI proved it can build a viral product but can't scale it profitably. Very different skill sets. Elon called it "unreasonable concentration of power for Google." He's right. But that's exactly why Apple chose them. Apple doesn't want a startup partner. They want a utility provider. Google is now the default AI for Android AND iOS. OpenAI is relegated to opt-in queries for people who specifically request ChatGPT. That's the difference between infrastructure and feature. The next 12 months: Apple launches Gemini-powered Siri in spring 2026. If it works, every iPhone user defaults to Google's AI. ChatGPT becomes the thing people use when Siri can't answer. The backup plan. My takeaway for entrepreneurs watching this: Distribution beats innovation. Google didn't necessarily build a better chatbot. They built better infrastructure and negotiated better terms. OpenAI won the hype race. Google won the business war. What do you think can save OpenAI now?

Ricardo

50,741 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce