Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

#Iran’s FM: Previously, Iran’s #nuclear issue was on a peaceful solution path. But now, with war & casualties, it’s not easy to reach agreement as before. US mistakes not only didn’t help resolve the nuclear issue, but made it far more complex & complicated.

Iran Nuances

19,758 subscribers

15,770 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

#Iran FM (on Trump's remarks): US attacked our #nuclear sites. Our nuclear & enrichment facilities have been destroyed, badly & seriously damaged. But military option was not able to resolve the problem. Technology is there... We've always been prepared for a diplomatic solution.

#Iran FM (on Trump's remarks): US attacked our #nuclear sites. Our nuclear & enrichment facilities have been destroyed, badly & seriously damaged. But military option was not able to resolve the problem. Technology is there... We've always been prepared for a diplomatic solution.

Iran Nuances

77,161 views • 10 months ago

🚨🇮🇷🇺🇸IRAN TO U.S: BOMB US, AND WE GO NUCLEAR Adviser to Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ali Larijani: “We have said that there is a Fatwa, we are working under the supervision of the IAEA and we won’t move towards a nuclear weapon, but if you make a mistake regarding Iran’s nuclear issue, you’ll force Iran to take that path, because it has to defend itself. If you at some point take the path of bombing (Iran’s nuclear sites) yourself or through Israel, you’ll force Iran to make a different decision. This is not your betterment.” Source: AP News

🚨🇮🇷🇺🇸IRAN TO U.S: BOMB US, AND WE GO NUCLEAR Adviser to Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ali Larijani: “We have said that there is a Fatwa, we are working under the supervision of the IAEA and we won’t move towards a nuclear weapon, but if you make a mistake regarding Iran’s nuclear issue, you’ll force Iran to take that path, because it has to defend itself. If you at some point take the path of bombing (Iran’s nuclear sites) yourself or through Israel, you’ll force Iran to make a different decision. This is not your betterment.” Source: AP News

Mario Nawfal

493,034 views • 1 year ago

"I think the main issue Trump wanted to see… was a willingness to make concessions on the nuclear program. It was not there." Barak Ravid with Jake Tapper 🦅 on why Trump was "not satisfied" with Iran’s amended proposal. 📺: The Lead CNN | Barak Ravid | Axios

"I think the main issue Trump wanted to see… was a willingness to make concessions on the nuclear program. It was not there." Barak Ravid with Jake Tapper 🦅 on why Trump was "not satisfied" with Iran’s amended proposal. 📺: The Lead CNN | Barak Ravid | Axios

Axios Comms

23,596 views • 3 months ago

⚡️🇮🇷🇺🇸JUST IN: Iran’s FM Abbas Araghchi: "It was not Iran, but the US that betrayed diplomacy. They betrayed the negotiations. In the middle of negotiations with us, they gave the green light to the Israelis, if not even instructed them, on how to attack Iran's nuclear facilities,"

⚡️🇮🇷🇺🇸JUST IN: Iran’s FM Abbas Araghchi: "It was not Iran, but the US that betrayed diplomacy. They betrayed the negotiations. In the middle of negotiations with us, they gave the green light to the Israelis, if not even instructed them, on how to attack Iran's nuclear facilities,"

Suppressed News.

132,721 views • 1 year ago

⭕️ How does Trump’s “one big glow” nuclear threat affect Iran’s internal debate? Jeremy Scahill calls Trump’s language extraordinarily reckless, saying even during the Cold War U.S. presidents did not casually speak this way about nuclear use. He says Iran’s nuclear weapons debate has become more serious since the U.S. war began. Iran now treats its 60% enriched uranium as a sovereignty issue, not just a bargaining chip. Giving it up early in talks would be seen domestically as surrender. 🎥 via Breaking Points (Krystal Ball, Emily Jashinsky, Mac with Drop Site’s jeremy scahill)

⭕️ How does Trump’s “one big glow” nuclear threat affect Iran’s internal debate? Jeremy Scahill calls Trump’s language extraordinarily reckless, saying even during the Cold War U.S. presidents did not casually speak this way about nuclear use. He says Iran’s nuclear weapons debate has become more serious since the U.S. war began. Iran now treats its 60% enriched uranium as a sovereignty issue, not just a bargaining chip. Giving it up early in talks would be seen domestically as surrender. 🎥 via Breaking Points (Krystal Ball, Emily Jashinsky, Mac with Drop Site’s jeremy scahill)

Drop Site

18,373 views • 2 months ago

Senator Chris Murhpy on Iran's nuclear program: The president has also said over and over again that a goal of the war is to permanently deny Iran the ability to have nuclear weapons. But in our closed-door briefings, we learned that this is not actually a goal of the war plan. It is not a goal of the war to destroy Iran’s nuclear program — which is not surprising, because you cannot destroy Iran’s nuclear program from the air. You cannot destroy knowledge. You cannot hunt down with missiles every Iranian scientist who knows how to build a nuclear reactor. And much of the material is buried so far underground that it is immune to an air campaign. But then why is the president and the Department of Defense telling the American people that the point of the war is to destroy Iran’s nuclear program?

Senator Chris Murhpy on Iran's nuclear program: The president has also said over and over again that a goal of the war is to permanently deny Iran the ability to have nuclear weapons. But in our closed-door briefings, we learned that this is not actually a goal of the war plan. It is not a goal of the war to destroy Iran’s nuclear program — which is not surprising, because you cannot destroy Iran’s nuclear program from the air. You cannot destroy knowledge. You cannot hunt down with missiles every Iranian scientist who knows how to build a nuclear reactor. And much of the material is buried so far underground that it is immune to an air campaign. But then why is the president and the Department of Defense telling the American people that the point of the war is to destroy Iran’s nuclear program?

Clash Report

31,792 views • 4 months ago

As we hear more about Iran’s attack, this was the moment Donald Trump propelled Iran even closer to obtaining nuclear weapons. Pulling out of the Iran deal was one of the biggest long term mistakes a sitting president made, in history. Don’t forget the biggest takeaway: Shame on NOT ONLY him, but anyone who could still support him.

As we hear more about Iran’s attack, this was the moment Donald Trump propelled Iran even closer to obtaining nuclear weapons. Pulling out of the Iran deal was one of the biggest long term mistakes a sitting president made, in history. Don’t forget the biggest takeaway: Shame on NOT ONLY him, but anyone who could still support him.

CALL TO ACTIVISM

1,676,936 views • 2 years ago

US President Donald Trump said he does not support regime change in Iran, calling it a path to chaos, and claimed nuclear weapons are “the last thing on Iran’s mind right now.”

US President Donald Trump said he does not support regime change in Iran, calling it a path to chaos, and claimed nuclear weapons are “the last thing on Iran’s mind right now.”

Al Jazeera English

52,489 views • 1 year ago

#Iran FM: Our #nuclear facilities have suffered serious damage, but knowledge & tech has not been eradicated. A peaceful solution is attainable if both sides respect each other's rights. My recommendation to US President is to return to diplomacy & a negotiated settlement. - AJE

#Iran FM: Our #nuclear facilities have suffered serious damage, but knowledge & tech has not been eradicated. A peaceful solution is attainable if both sides respect each other's rights. My recommendation to US President is to return to diplomacy & a negotiated settlement. - AJE

Iran Nuances

10,299 views • 7 months ago

Macron on the Iran war today: “Six months ago we were told everything had been destroyed and settled. Clearly that was not the case.” “A few weeks of military strikes cannot resolve the nuclear issue in the long term.” “Without a diplomatic and technical agreement the situation could deteriorate again in months or years.” The President of France just said out loud what every serious analyst has been saying since Day 1. Bombs don’t eliminate nuclear knowledge. You can destroy facilities. You cannot destroy physics. Iran’s scientists still exist. Iran’s knowledge still exists. Iran’s motivation — now intensified — still exists.

Macron on the Iran war today: “Six months ago we were told everything had been destroyed and settled. Clearly that was not the case.” “A few weeks of military strikes cannot resolve the nuclear issue in the long term.” “Without a diplomatic and technical agreement the situation could deteriorate again in months or years.” The President of France just said out loud what every serious analyst has been saying since Day 1. Bombs don’t eliminate nuclear knowledge. You can destroy facilities. You cannot destroy physics. Iran’s scientists still exist. Iran’s knowledge still exists. Iran’s motivation — now intensified — still exists.

Brian Allen

106,499 views • 4 months ago

Bret Baier calls out Iranian FM on the nuclear issue: Bret: “Legitimate peaceful purposes, legitimate peaceful purposes for a nuclear program, usually are not buried a mile down deep.” Abbas Araghchi: “President Trump proved to be against diplomacy when he attacked us in June and when now he decided to cut any communication”

Bret Baier calls out Iranian FM on the nuclear issue: Bret: “Legitimate peaceful purposes, legitimate peaceful purposes for a nuclear program, usually are not buried a mile down deep.” Abbas Araghchi: “President Trump proved to be against diplomacy when he attacked us in June and when now he decided to cut any communication”

Open Source Intel

43,543 views • 6 months ago

#Iran’s FM: We are facing a new situation at UNSC, UN, & IAEA. In our view, the necessary consensus to decide on snapback did not exist in UNSC. Russia & China also believe it did not exist. Now, these matters must be discussed & reviewed in SNSC and its #nuclear committee.

#Iran’s FM: We are facing a new situation at UNSC, UN, & IAEA. In our view, the necessary consensus to decide on snapback did not exist in UNSC. Russia & China also believe it did not exist. Now, these matters must be discussed & reviewed in SNSC and its #nuclear committee.

Iran Nuances

17,099 views • 10 months ago

Is concern over Iran’s nuclear program repeating the mistakes that preceded the Iraq War? Nuclear weapons expert David Albright: “Not at all.” “I was engaged in criticizing the Bush administration’s assessments on Iraqi nuclear fantasies… There’s very concrete evidence that while there was nothing to be found with Iraq in 2002–2003, there was a lot to be found in Iran.”

Is concern over Iran’s nuclear program repeating the mistakes that preceded the Iraq War? Nuclear weapons expert David Albright: “Not at all.” “I was engaged in criticizing the Bush administration’s assessments on Iraqi nuclear fantasies… There’s very concrete evidence that while there was nothing to be found with Iraq in 2002–2003, there was a lot to be found in Iran.”

The Free Press

20,392 views • 1 year ago

The White House says the proposed memorandum of understanding with Iran is only a framework agreement, not a final 'peace deal.' US officials say negotiations on Iran’s nuclear programme will begin after the June 19 signing, with sanctions relief tied to inspections.

The White House says the proposed memorandum of understanding with Iran is only a framework agreement, not a final 'peace deal.' US officials say negotiations on Iran’s nuclear programme will begin after the June 19 signing, with sanctions relief tied to inspections.

Al Jazeera English

20,083 views • 1 month ago

Iran may not have ballistic missiles with range to reach the US but they have armed container ships that can reach the US. The US must never consider itself immune from retaliatory attacks from Iran. Trump threats to bomb Iran’s nuclear and ballistic missiles sites.

Iran may not have ballistic missiles with range to reach the US but they have armed container ships that can reach the US. The US must never consider itself immune from retaliatory attacks from Iran. Trump threats to bomb Iran’s nuclear and ballistic missiles sites.

Sentletse 🇿🇦🇷🇺🇵🇸🇱🇧

21,952 views • 6 months ago

🇮🇷🇺🇸| Iranian FM: We're not yet convinced that the US has the real determination & desire for a win-win agreement. Iran’s nuclear program is 100% peaceful and determined to continue this program. The ceasefire is fragile for a clear reason as the Israeli regime has a terrible track record. We remain fully prepared.

🇮🇷🇺🇸| Iranian FM: We're not yet convinced that the US has the real determination & desire for a win-win agreement. Iran’s nuclear program is 100% peaceful and determined to continue this program. The ceasefire is fragile for a clear reason as the Israeli regime has a terrible track record. We remain fully prepared.

Arya - آریا

43,334 views • 1 year ago

SECRETARY RUBIO: There is no one who has been tougher on the issue of Iran’s nuclear ambitions than PRESIDENT TRUMP. Multiple political leaders have said Iran cannot have nuclear weapons, but the only one who has done something about it in a real way is President Trump.

SECRETARY RUBIO: There is no one who has been tougher on the issue of Iran’s nuclear ambitions than PRESIDENT TRUMP. Multiple political leaders have said Iran cannot have nuclear weapons, but the only one who has done something about it in a real way is President Trump.

Department of State

97,480 views • 2 months ago

U.S. veteran questioned if he supported the U.S. getting into war with Iran. He opposes war with Iran, advocating for precision strikes on their nuclear capabilities to prevent high-enriched uranium for bombs. He rejects ground troops, citing Iran’s oppressive leadership, which has regressed women’s rights and education since the Ayatollah’s rise. A nuclear-armed Iran is a threat to the West and the world, but prolonged conflicts like Iraq or Afghanistan must be avoided. Phased, targeted strikes are the solution, and he believes Trump would avoid long-term entanglement. Iran’s people are not the issue, but their extremist leaders require strategic correction.

U.S. veteran questioned if he supported the U.S. getting into war with Iran. He opposes war with Iran, advocating for precision strikes on their nuclear capabilities to prevent high-enriched uranium for bombs. He rejects ground troops, citing Iran’s oppressive leadership, which has regressed women’s rights and education since the Ayatollah’s rise. A nuclear-armed Iran is a threat to the West and the world, but prolonged conflicts like Iraq or Afghanistan must be avoided. Phased, targeted strikes are the solution, and he believes Trump would avoid long-term entanglement. Iran’s people are not the issue, but their extremist leaders require strategic correction.

ꪻꫝể ꪻꫝể

16,864 views • 1 year ago

A decade ago, we warned #Iran. Here, amidst Iran’s “death to America” chants, we rallied to bring the issue to the forefront. Obama was WRONG not standing against Iran’s pursuits that would lead to nuclear weaponry in the hands of those wishing to destroy us and our allies. #Trump was there. Love him or hate him, he’s been (as Gutfeld! has said) “directionally consistent” on the issue way before taking office. So I ask, why the shock and opposition to #POTUS position today? Serious question:

A decade ago, we warned #Iran. Here, amidst Iran’s “death to America” chants, we rallied to bring the issue to the forefront. Obama was WRONG not standing against Iran’s pursuits that would lead to nuclear weaponry in the hands of those wishing to destroy us and our allies. #Trump was there. Love him or hate him, he’s been (as Gutfeld! has said) “directionally consistent” on the issue way before taking office. So I ask, why the shock and opposition to #POTUS position today? Serious question:

Sarah Palin

127,775 views • 1 year ago

Candace Owens, you're not MAGA anymore, siding with Iran’s nuclear ambitions. MAGA supports the president and recognizes the necessity of stopping Iran, a mortal enemy, from gaining nuclear weapons. Supporting Owens aligns with Obama’s Iran deal, ignoring their “death to America” chants. Iran’s proxy, Hamas, started this conflict on October 7th, killing Israelis. Destroying Iran’s nuclear capabilities was critical, no American troops died, no nuclear war ensued. Ignoring this risks alienating allies and empowering sleeper cells already in the U.S. True MAGA rejects Owens’ stance, as it’s moderate, not conservative. Your MAGA membership is revoked.

Candace Owens, you're not MAGA anymore, siding with Iran’s nuclear ambitions. MAGA supports the president and recognizes the necessity of stopping Iran, a mortal enemy, from gaining nuclear weapons. Supporting Owens aligns with Obama’s Iran deal, ignoring their “death to America” chants. Iran’s proxy, Hamas, started this conflict on October 7th, killing Israelis. Destroying Iran’s nuclear capabilities was critical, no American troops died, no nuclear war ensued. Ignoring this risks alienating allies and empowering sleeper cells already in the U.S. True MAGA rejects Owens’ stance, as it’s moderate, not conservative. Your MAGA membership is revoked.

ꪻꫝể ꪻꫝể

29,603 views • 1 year ago