正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

⭕️ How does Trump’s “one big glow” nuclear threat affect Iran’s internal debate? Jeremy Scahill calls Trump’s language extraordinarily reckless, saying even during the Cold War U.S. presidents did not casually speak this way about nuclear use. He says Iran’s nuclear weapons debate has become more serious since the... show more

Drop Site

434,159 subscribers

18,373 次观看 • 4 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Jeremy Scahill told Breaking Points Iran may accept broad language about nuclear issues or restate its long-held position that it does not seek nuclear weapons. But he says detailed front-end commitments on enrichment in any initial memorandum would cross a red line. 🎥 via Breaking Points (Krystal Ball, Emily Jashinsky, Mac with Drop Site’s jeremy scahill)

Jeremy Scahill told Breaking Points Iran may accept broad language about nuclear issues or restate its long-held position that it does not seek nuclear weapons. But he says detailed front-end commitments on enrichment in any initial memorandum would cross a red line. 🎥 via Breaking Points (Krystal Ball, Emily Jashinsky, Mac with Drop Site’s jeremy scahill)

Drop Site

21,077 次观看 • 4 个月前

⭕️ New: Jeremy Scahill reports that Iran had finalized its response to a U.S. memorandum proposal but paused submitting it yesterday after U.S. strikes, which they noted as a ceasefire violation. Pakistan, the main mediator, was alarmed and worked urgently to prevent further escalation. Scahill also says Trump is overstating Iran’s desperation for a deal and that U.S. claims about Iran’s military degradation have been misleading. 🎥 via Breaking Points (Krystal Ball, Emily Jashinsky, Mac with Drop Site’s jeremy scahill)

⭕️ New: Jeremy Scahill reports that Iran had finalized its response to a U.S. memorandum proposal but paused submitting it yesterday after U.S. strikes, which they noted as a ceasefire violation. Pakistan, the main mediator, was alarmed and worked urgently to prevent further escalation. Scahill also says Trump is overstating Iran’s desperation for a deal and that U.S. claims about Iran’s military degradation have been misleading. 🎥 via Breaking Points (Krystal Ball, Emily Jashinsky, Mac with Drop Site’s jeremy scahill)

Drop Site

47,739 次观看 • 4 个月前

💢 Does Iran’s control over Hormuz reduce its need for nuclear weapons? Jeremy says Iran clearly recognizes the Strait of Hormuz as a powerful deterrent. It has used small boats, limited firepower, and political will to disrupt a massive part of the global energy system. But he says the nuclear debate remains ongoing. He also expects Gulf countries will now look harder to build capacity for alternative routes, while Iran builds overland transit links and expands its ballistic missile capabilities. 🎥 Breaking Points (w/ Krystal Ball, Emily Jashinsky, Mac, jeremy scahill)

💢 Does Iran’s control over Hormuz reduce its need for nuclear weapons? Jeremy says Iran clearly recognizes the Strait of Hormuz as a powerful deterrent. It has used small boats, limited firepower, and political will to disrupt a massive part of the global energy system. But he says the nuclear debate remains ongoing. He also expects Gulf countries will now look harder to build capacity for alternative routes, while Iran builds overland transit links and expands its ballistic missile capabilities. 🎥 Breaking Points (w/ Krystal Ball, Emily Jashinsky, Mac, jeremy scahill)

Drop Site

12,626 次观看 • 4 个月前

🎥 Jeremy Scahill told Breaking Points the U.S. entered the talks without the high-level nuclear experts needed for serious diplomacy, while Iran arrived with a multidisciplinary team of technical specialists. On the nuclear file, the Trump administration has already made a major concession by dropping its demand that Iran’s enriched uranium be removed from the country. In the clip below, Scahill also discusses Qatar’s emergence as a lead mediator, the expanding role of Pakistan and possibly the IAEA, and why Washington may be willing to outsource core elements of negotiations it calls its top national security priority. jeremy scahill | Krystal Ball | Saagar Enjeti

🎥 Jeremy Scahill told Breaking Points the U.S. entered the talks without the high-level nuclear experts needed for serious diplomacy, while Iran arrived with a multidisciplinary team of technical specialists. On the nuclear file, the Trump administration has already made a major concession by dropping its demand that Iran’s enriched uranium be removed from the country. In the clip below, Scahill also discusses Qatar’s emergence as a lead mediator, the expanding role of Pakistan and possibly the IAEA, and why Washington may be willing to outsource core elements of negotiations it calls its top national security priority. jeremy scahill | Krystal Ball | Saagar Enjeti

Drop Site

35,026 次观看 • 3 个月前

🎥 Jeremy Scahill Breaks Down the Current State of the War and Negotiations President Trump is trying to spin the emerging U.S.–Iran memorandum of understanding as a victory, but the core U.S. demands have fallen away, Jeremy Scahill said. “The 2015 JCPOA already said Iran would not seek, develop, or acquire nuclear weapons,” Scahill said. “The Strait of Hormuz was open before the war began.” Iran’s key demands now are lifting the U.S. military blockade on Hormuz, withdrawing U.S. forces amassed in the region, repatriating billions in frozen assets, and importantly, securing an end to Israel’s war on Lebanon, he explains. jeremy scahill | Ryan Grim

🎥 Jeremy Scahill Breaks Down the Current State of the War and Negotiations President Trump is trying to spin the emerging U.S.–Iran memorandum of understanding as a victory, but the core U.S. demands have fallen away, Jeremy Scahill said. “The 2015 JCPOA already said Iran would not seek, develop, or acquire nuclear weapons,” Scahill said. “The Strait of Hormuz was open before the war began.” Iran’s key demands now are lifting the U.S. military blockade on Hormuz, withdrawing U.S. forces amassed in the region, repatriating billions in frozen assets, and importantly, securing an end to Israel’s war on Lebanon, he explains. jeremy scahill | Ryan Grim

Drop Site

17,505 次观看 • 3 个月前

🎥 Jeremy Scahill on the opening of the Iran-U.S. 60-day talks Scahill says the first day of negotiations in Switzerland unfolded against fierce debate inside Iran over whether officials should meet with the Trump administration after the war. Israel attempted to undermine the talks by escalating its assault on Lebanon, while Iran used the Strait of Hormuz as leverage before its delegation arrived. Scahill discusses Tehran’s brief walkout, describing it not as a collapse of negotiations but a calculated signal that it still holds leverage. jeremy scahill | Krystal Ball | Saagar Enjeti

🎥 Jeremy Scahill on the opening of the Iran-U.S. 60-day talks Scahill says the first day of negotiations in Switzerland unfolded against fierce debate inside Iran over whether officials should meet with the Trump administration after the war. Israel attempted to undermine the talks by escalating its assault on Lebanon, while Iran used the Strait of Hormuz as leverage before its delegation arrived. Scahill discusses Tehran’s brief walkout, describing it not as a collapse of negotiations but a calculated signal that it still holds leverage. jeremy scahill | Krystal Ball | Saagar Enjeti

Drop Site

31,310 次观看 • 3 个月前

🎥 Why did Saudi Arabia and Kuwait resist helping U.S. Operation “Project Freedom”? Jeremy Scahill says Saudi and Kuwaiti resistance was one factor in Trump backing off Project Freedom. Kuwait, in particular, had taken heavy strikes during the war and did not want to be left exposed again. He says the Gulf states likely felt the U.S. prioritized Israel and its own war aims while leaving them vulnerable. He also suggests the blockade has been a “strategic failure” for Trump, and hurt many countries more than Iran – which still has food, fuel, and basic supplies, despite liquidity problems and inflation. — 🔹Video: Breaking Points (Krystal Ball, Emily Jashinsky, Mac with Drop Site’s jeremy scahill)

🎥 Why did Saudi Arabia and Kuwait resist helping U.S. Operation “Project Freedom”? Jeremy Scahill says Saudi and Kuwaiti resistance was one factor in Trump backing off Project Freedom. Kuwait, in particular, had taken heavy strikes during the war and did not want to be left exposed again. He says the Gulf states likely felt the U.S. prioritized Israel and its own war aims while leaving them vulnerable. He also suggests the blockade has been a “strategic failure” for Trump, and hurt many countries more than Iran – which still has food, fuel, and basic supplies, despite liquidity problems and inflation. — 🔹Video: Breaking Points (Krystal Ball, Emily Jashinsky, Mac with Drop Site’s jeremy scahill)

Drop Site

29,040 次观看 • 4 个月前

🎥 “It’s like you might as well be sitting with a fourth grader.” — Jeremy Scahill relaying how Iranian officials described U.S. envoy Steve Witkoff during ongoing negotiations with Iran. Speaking on Majority Report, Scahill said the talks reflected a broader pattern of U.S. policy in the region being shaped by Israeli intelligence and around Israeli objectives. Iran came to the table with nuclear PhDs and experts fluent in every clause of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action. The U.S. “sent Trump’s golf buddy and his son-in-law.” Scahill said Jared Kushner was “not…operating on behalf of U.S. national security” at all — but those of Israel, the Gulf states, and the “Trump crime family” business. He cited Kushner’s significant financial backing from Gulf sovereign wealth funds and reported ongoing coordination with PM Benjamin Netanyahu throughout the talks. Contrasting that with Iran’s delegation of nuclear specialists and policy experts, Scahill said Iranian officials ultimately concluded the February negotiations were not serious, but a prelude to war. jeremy scahill | Emma Vigeland

🎥 “It’s like you might as well be sitting with a fourth grader.” — Jeremy Scahill relaying how Iranian officials described U.S. envoy Steve Witkoff during ongoing negotiations with Iran. Speaking on Majority Report, Scahill said the talks reflected a broader pattern of U.S. policy in the region being shaped by Israeli intelligence and around Israeli objectives. Iran came to the table with nuclear PhDs and experts fluent in every clause of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action. The U.S. “sent Trump’s golf buddy and his son-in-law.” Scahill said Jared Kushner was “not…operating on behalf of U.S. national security” at all — but those of Israel, the Gulf states, and the “Trump crime family” business. He cited Kushner’s significant financial backing from Gulf sovereign wealth funds and reported ongoing coordination with PM Benjamin Netanyahu throughout the talks. Contrasting that with Iran’s delegation of nuclear specialists and policy experts, Scahill said Iranian officials ultimately concluded the February negotiations were not serious, but a prelude to war. jeremy scahill | Emma Vigeland

Drop Site

100,015 次观看 • 5 个月前

⭕️ WATCH | Jeremy Scahill lays out where things stand on the U.S. escalation with Iran, as Iranian officials are now openly signaling willingness to meet U.S. envoys, with talks potentially taking place in Ankara later this week. Scahill warned that diplomacy has been used before as a tactical cover. He detailed Drop Site’s reporting that U.S. Central Command has quietly told at least one top Arab ally to prepare for possible U.S. strikes on Iran, with the military posture unchanged even after an expected Sunday deadline passed. Scahill also discussed how U.S.-allied Arab states are publicly distancing themselves from an attack while continuing to provide critical behind-the-scenes support, including surveillance, airspace coordination, and logistics during past U.S. and Israeli strikes. Claims that their territory won’t be used, he says, are “a misdirect,” stressing that “whether or not they’re physically allowing warplanes to take off is not really the issue.” jeremy scahill | Drop Site

⭕️ WATCH | Jeremy Scahill lays out where things stand on the U.S. escalation with Iran, as Iranian officials are now openly signaling willingness to meet U.S. envoys, with talks potentially taking place in Ankara later this week. Scahill warned that diplomacy has been used before as a tactical cover. He detailed Drop Site’s reporting that U.S. Central Command has quietly told at least one top Arab ally to prepare for possible U.S. strikes on Iran, with the military posture unchanged even after an expected Sunday deadline passed. Scahill also discussed how U.S.-allied Arab states are publicly distancing themselves from an attack while continuing to provide critical behind-the-scenes support, including surveillance, airspace coordination, and logistics during past U.S. and Israeli strikes. Claims that their territory won’t be used, he says, are “a misdirect,” stressing that “whether or not they’re physically allowing warplanes to take off is not really the issue.” jeremy scahill | Drop Site

Drop Site

22,535 次观看 • 8 个月前

🚨 IRAN’S URANIUM STOCKPILE MAY NOW BE HIDDEN INSIDE “PICKAXE MOUNTAIN” U.S. intelligence sources believe Iran has moved its remaining enriched uranium stockpile to a heavily fortified underground complex known as “Pickaxe Mountain.” The site is believed to be deeply buried inside a mountain near Iran’s nuclear infrastructure, with tunnels reinforced to withstand even the most powerful conventional bunker-buster weapons. If the reports are accurate, it would mean Tehran has placed its most sensitive nuclear material inside one of the hardest targets on Earth to destroy. Satellite imagery over recent years has shown massive tunnel entrances, expanding underground chambers, and heavy security, suggesting the site was designed specifically to protect critical nuclear assets. For military planners, the implications are serious. Facilities like this are built for one purpose: to survive a strike and preserve a nuclear program even if everything above ground is destroyed. If Iran’s uranium has indeed been moved there, the strategic equation around its nuclear capability may have just changed dramatically.

🚨 IRAN’S URANIUM STOCKPILE MAY NOW BE HIDDEN INSIDE “PICKAXE MOUNTAIN” U.S. intelligence sources believe Iran has moved its remaining enriched uranium stockpile to a heavily fortified underground complex known as “Pickaxe Mountain.” The site is believed to be deeply buried inside a mountain near Iran’s nuclear infrastructure, with tunnels reinforced to withstand even the most powerful conventional bunker-buster weapons. If the reports are accurate, it would mean Tehran has placed its most sensitive nuclear material inside one of the hardest targets on Earth to destroy. Satellite imagery over recent years has shown massive tunnel entrances, expanding underground chambers, and heavy security, suggesting the site was designed specifically to protect critical nuclear assets. For military planners, the implications are serious. Facilities like this are built for one purpose: to survive a strike and preserve a nuclear program even if everything above ground is destroyed. If Iran’s uranium has indeed been moved there, the strategic equation around its nuclear capability may have just changed dramatically.

Jim Ferguson

67,489 次观看 • 6 个月前

🎥 There is active debate inside Tehran over whether Iran halted fighting too soon, academic Hassan Ahmadian told Drop Site’s Jeremy Scahill. Scahill noted some experts believe the pause may have cost Iran tactical leverage by giving the U.S. time to restock. Ahmadian said there may be some merit to that view, but argued the U.S. and Israel “cannot just restart the war in two weeks” if they are “running low… [because] anti-defense missiles are not produced en masse.” Overall, he said Iran aimed to “push back in a way that forces its foes to think twice and thrice,” and believes that objective was met, with regional actors also wary of renewed war. On Israel, Ahmadian said the conflict exposed a key strategic limit: “Israel showcased once more that it cannot shoulder such a confrontation with Iran absent the U.S.… That’s a shift in the balance of power in the region.” jeremy scahill | Hassan Ahmadian حسن احمدیان

🎥 There is active debate inside Tehran over whether Iran halted fighting too soon, academic Hassan Ahmadian told Drop Site’s Jeremy Scahill. Scahill noted some experts believe the pause may have cost Iran tactical leverage by giving the U.S. time to restock. Ahmadian said there may be some merit to that view, but argued the U.S. and Israel “cannot just restart the war in two weeks” if they are “running low… [because] anti-defense missiles are not produced en masse.” Overall, he said Iran aimed to “push back in a way that forces its foes to think twice and thrice,” and believes that objective was met, with regional actors also wary of renewed war. On Israel, Ahmadian said the conflict exposed a key strategic limit: “Israel showcased once more that it cannot shoulder such a confrontation with Iran absent the U.S.… That’s a shift in the balance of power in the region.” jeremy scahill | Hassan Ahmadian حسن احمدیان

Drop Site

89,470 次观看 • 5 个月前

🇮🇷🇺🇸 BIG | Iranian officials are drawing a provocative lesson from the war with the United States: nuclear deterrence, they argue, has proved more valuable than even the most advanced conventional military technology. Iran’s Supreme National Security Council Secretary Mohsen Rezaei said the conflict demonstrated that possessing nuclear weapons is “more effective than hundreds of F-35s.” He further claimed that the American stealth fighter had lost its status as a symbol of power in Iran and that Arab states were increasingly losing confidence in U.S.-supplied weaponry. Rezaei also argued that the American public opposes the war and does not support Washington’s military campaign, while portraying Iranian society and the government as united behind the country’s armed forces. The statement is particularly notable given Tehran’s longstanding official position that Iran is not seeking nuclear weapons. Rezaei’s rhetoric instead presents nuclear deterrence as a strategic lesson from the conflict, suggesting that parts of Iran’s security establishment increasingly view the war through the lens of whether conventional military power alone can deter another U.S. attack. That debate could become one of the most consequential long-term effects of the conflict. See the latest updates with us: Visioner

🇮🇷🇺🇸 BIG | Iranian officials are drawing a provocative lesson from the war with the United States: nuclear deterrence, they argue, has proved more valuable than even the most advanced conventional military technology. Iran’s Supreme National Security Council Secretary Mohsen Rezaei said the conflict demonstrated that possessing nuclear weapons is “more effective than hundreds of F-35s.” He further claimed that the American stealth fighter had lost its status as a symbol of power in Iran and that Arab states were increasingly losing confidence in U.S.-supplied weaponry. Rezaei also argued that the American public opposes the war and does not support Washington’s military campaign, while portraying Iranian society and the government as united behind the country’s armed forces. The statement is particularly notable given Tehran’s longstanding official position that Iran is not seeking nuclear weapons. Rezaei’s rhetoric instead presents nuclear deterrence as a strategic lesson from the conflict, suggesting that parts of Iran’s security establishment increasingly view the war through the lens of whether conventional military power alone can deter another U.S. attack. That debate could become one of the most consequential long-term effects of the conflict. See the latest updates with us: Visioner

Visioner

22,222 次观看 • 1 个月前

🇺🇸🇮🇷 An Ohio-class submarine just surfaced in the Strait of Gibraltar in plain sight; they only do that when they want to be seen. Retired Lt. Col. Karen Kwiatkowski says Iran added war reparations back to its list of demands, knowing the U.S. won't pay them. Not as a serious ask, but as a bargaining chip. Iran read the U.S. military correctly. The Americans cannot force Iran to do anything with conventional weapons, and nobody is going nuclear. "The American military is struggling with how to make Trump happy without causing a huge disaster." Karen Kwiatkowski

🇺🇸🇮🇷 An Ohio-class submarine just surfaced in the Strait of Gibraltar in plain sight; they only do that when they want to be seen. Retired Lt. Col. Karen Kwiatkowski says Iran added war reparations back to its list of demands, knowing the U.S. won't pay them. Not as a serious ask, but as a bargaining chip. Iran read the U.S. military correctly. The Americans cannot force Iran to do anything with conventional weapons, and nobody is going nuclear. "The American military is struggling with how to make Trump happy without causing a huge disaster." Karen Kwiatkowski

Mario Nawfal

56,255 次观看 • 4 个月前

Iran has proposed a deal to the U.S. to reopen the Strait of Hormuz and end the war, while deferring nuclear talks to a later stage. President Trump has summoned a Situation Room meeting today to decide Washington’s response. Why accepting this deal by the U.S. would be a defeat for the United States and a big victory for Iran, let’s understand in simple language: The Strait of Hormuz was open before the war, and it will be open after the war once peace is restored. Then what was the objective of this war? This will remain a big question. The initial objectives of the U.S. and Israel were regime change, seizing enriched uranium, and destroying Iran’s nuclear and long-range missile programs. Have they achieved any of these? No. Rather, after this deal, the Islamic regime will intensify its nuclear weapons and long-range missile programs without hesitation because they now know the weakness of the United States. Postponing discussions on the nuclear program indirectly means that Iran is not going to stop. What are the future repercussions of this deal? Many independent journalists have reported that the current IRGC chief, Ahmad Wahidi, has ordered an intensification of the nuclear weapons development program. After a few months or years, Iran may have a nuclear bomb. Once Iran acquires nuclear weapons and long-range missiles, neither the United States nor any other country will be able to save Israel. The Islamic regime has the intent but not the capability to target the U.S. mainland; the day they gain that capability, they will target the U.S. mainland. In short, we can say that this is a trap for the U.S.

Iran has proposed a deal to the U.S. to reopen the Strait of Hormuz and end the war, while deferring nuclear talks to a later stage. President Trump has summoned a Situation Room meeting today to decide Washington’s response. Why accepting this deal by the U.S. would be a defeat for the United States and a big victory for Iran, let’s understand in simple language: The Strait of Hormuz was open before the war, and it will be open after the war once peace is restored. Then what was the objective of this war? This will remain a big question. The initial objectives of the U.S. and Israel were regime change, seizing enriched uranium, and destroying Iran’s nuclear and long-range missile programs. Have they achieved any of these? No. Rather, after this deal, the Islamic regime will intensify its nuclear weapons and long-range missile programs without hesitation because they now know the weakness of the United States. Postponing discussions on the nuclear program indirectly means that Iran is not going to stop. What are the future repercussions of this deal? Many independent journalists have reported that the current IRGC chief, Ahmad Wahidi, has ordered an intensification of the nuclear weapons development program. After a few months or years, Iran may have a nuclear bomb. Once Iran acquires nuclear weapons and long-range missiles, neither the United States nor any other country will be able to save Israel. The Islamic regime has the intent but not the capability to target the U.S. mainland; the day they gain that capability, they will target the U.S. mainland. In short, we can say that this is a trap for the U.S.

Baba Banaras™

36,866 次观看 • 5 个月前

🎥 Will Iran Abandon Nuclear Restraint? For decades, Iran has refrained from developing nuclear weapons—not because it lacked the technical capacity, but because of a deliberate political and religious decision. A fatwa from the Supreme Leader declared nuclear arms forbidden under Islam. But after the U.S. and Israel bombed three Iranian nuclear sites this weekend—sites under regular IAEA inspection—that restraint is now under serious strain. “There are people in Iran asking that question right now,” Dr. Foad Izadi told Drop Site’. The question: What’s the point of cooperation? Izadi noted that two nuclear-armed states just launched an unprovoked attack on a non-nuclear country, without credible evidence of a weapons program. He pointed to the U.S. intelligence community’s own March report, which states: ➤ Iran does not have a nuclear weapon. ➤ Iran does not have a nuclear weapons program. ➤ Iranian leaders have not made a decision to pursue one. Even IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi, Izadi said, has consistently affirmed: “We have never found a nuclear weapons program in Iran.” Yet, Iran was bombed anyway. Izadi explained that the IAEA report cited by Western governments referenced materials from 20 to 30 years ago—files Iran believed were closed under the 2015 nuclear deal. Tehran now suspects Mossad may have planted radioactive traces to fabricate suspicion and justify military strikes. “There’s a lot of confusion and disinformation,” he said. But for many Iranians, the conclusion is simple: Iran upheld its obligations—and was attacked regardless. That, Izadi points out, is forcing a national reckoning with the logic of nuclear restraint. (Apologies for the poor audio quality. We’ll share a subtitled version of the clip below) jeremy scahill | فواد ایزدی Foad Izadi

🎥 Will Iran Abandon Nuclear Restraint? For decades, Iran has refrained from developing nuclear weapons—not because it lacked the technical capacity, but because of a deliberate political and religious decision. A fatwa from the Supreme Leader declared nuclear arms forbidden under Islam. But after the U.S. and Israel bombed three Iranian nuclear sites this weekend—sites under regular IAEA inspection—that restraint is now under serious strain. “There are people in Iran asking that question right now,” Dr. Foad Izadi told Drop Site’. The question: What’s the point of cooperation? Izadi noted that two nuclear-armed states just launched an unprovoked attack on a non-nuclear country, without credible evidence of a weapons program. He pointed to the U.S. intelligence community’s own March report, which states: ➤ Iran does not have a nuclear weapon. ➤ Iran does not have a nuclear weapons program. ➤ Iranian leaders have not made a decision to pursue one. Even IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi, Izadi said, has consistently affirmed: “We have never found a nuclear weapons program in Iran.” Yet, Iran was bombed anyway. Izadi explained that the IAEA report cited by Western governments referenced materials from 20 to 30 years ago—files Iran believed were closed under the 2015 nuclear deal. Tehran now suspects Mossad may have planted radioactive traces to fabricate suspicion and justify military strikes. “There’s a lot of confusion and disinformation,” he said. But for many Iranians, the conclusion is simple: Iran upheld its obligations—and was attacked regardless. That, Izadi points out, is forcing a national reckoning with the logic of nuclear restraint. (Apologies for the poor audio quality. We’ll share a subtitled version of the clip below) jeremy scahill | فواد ایزدی Foad Izadi

Drop Site

25,482 次观看 • 1 年前