正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

🚨 Iran’s largest commercial port is nearly empty, a devastating sign that the Islamic Republic’s economic arteries are being choked. Shahid Rajaee Port in Bandar Abbas normally handles roughly 70–85% of Iran’s container traffic, with its roads and customs yards packed with trucks moving imports and exports across the...

36,231 次观看 • 1 天前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

This is the Gokwe–Binga highway in Zimbabwe. These trucks have been stuck here for more than three days because of the terrible condition of the road. One of the trucks hit a massive pothole, or perhaps a sinkhole, and the impact damaged its suspension, including the springs and shock absorbers. The truck could no longer move, effectively blocking the road and leaving the other trucks stranded. This is exactly what we mean when we talk about the incompetence, corruption and failure of governance under the ZANUPF government. Look at the attached video. This is no longer a question of routine road maintenance. This road needs to be reconstructed. There is barely a proper road here at all, let alone a tarred highway. And yet millions of dollars’ worth of goods are transported along these routes every day by the Chinese. The companies using these roads pay taxes, licences, fuel levies and other charges to the government. In return, they are being forced to operate on roads that are barely passable. This is not just an inconvenience. It has a direct economic cost to everyone. Trucks lose days sitting idle. Transport companies lose money. Businesses face delays. Goods take longer to reach their destinations. Vehicle maintenance costs increase. Ultimately, those costs are passed on to consumers, YOU. And this is where the failure becomes even more difficult to understand. Zimbabwe is strategically located between major regional markets, yet we cannot maintain the basic infrastructure required to move goods efficiently. A functioning economy depends on roads and railways that work. In an ordinary, functional country, you would also expect a significant proportion of heavy bulk freight to be moved by an efficient railway network rather than putting enormous pressure on already inadequate roads. Zimbabwe inherited an extensive railway network from the Rhodesian era, but decades of neglect by ZANUPF have left much of that infrastructure severely degraded. This is the bigger tragedy that we can imagine. Zimbabwe has the natural resources, the agricultural potential, the geographical position and the human talent to be a prosperous country. What is missing is competent, accountable governance and the political will to maintain the infrastructure that keeps the economy moving without stealing state funds. Where corruption and political patronage determine who gets contracts, who gets licences and who gets access to opportunities, public infrastructure becomes an afterthought. Money that should be going into roads, railways, hospitals, schools and other public services can instead disappear through corruption, inflated contracts, procurement abuse and political patronage. This is not about hating ZANUPF, hating China, or being anti-government. It is about demanding accountability from the people who have been entrusted with running the country and are holding the national purse. If a government cannot maintain something as fundamental as a major transport corridor, how can it realistically claim that Zimbabwe is developing? You cannot build a modern economy on roads like this. You cannot talk about industrialisation while trucks carrying millions of dollars’ worth of goods are stuck for days because there is effectively no road. You cannot talk about economic growth while the infrastructure that supports that economy is collapsing. And you cannot hide the reality on the ground with propaganda, speeches and political slogans. Zimbabwe has increasingly become a case study in how not to run a country. The pictures tell the story. No amount of propaganda can change what people see with their own eyes. We love Zimbabwe. That is precisely why we should be angry about this. Loving your country means demanding better from those who govern it. Where is the money paid daily through toll gate fees, license discs, environmental levies, and more? If it is not being looted, why are the roads not fixed.

Hopewell Chin’ono

77,763 次观看 • 14 天前

"The authorities have completely lost control over the economy," — Igor Lipsits Igor Lipsits, an exiled Russian economist, argues the Russian economy is not a true market economy and is in a precarious state, characterized by a war-driven "mobilization economy" that relies heavily on state spending and is depleting long-term resources. He points to rising poverty and a severe budget deficit, which the government is trying to address through tax increases, while official figures of growth are misleadingly high due to factors like panic-driven inventory accumulation rather than genuine productivity. Key points from Igor Lipsits on the Russian economy: •Misleading official figures: He states that reported GDP growth is misleading, inflated by military spending and the accumulation of inventories by businesses afraid of supply chain disruptions, not by actual economic progress. •"Mobilization economy": The economy is shifting towards a wartime footing, with resources directed towards the military-industrial complex. This erodes the framework of a free market and sustainability for other sectors over time. •Budget crisis: The government faces a massive budget deficit, with military spending consuming a huge portion of the budget while tax revenues are falling and reserves are being depleted. •Strained private sector: Businesses are being squeezed by tax hikes and a lack of investment. Many industries are operating at a loss, and the government is taxing profits that don't exist. •Economic inequality: While the middle class is struggling, a segment of the population, particularly families of soldiers and those in stagnant regions, are experiencing a form of economic benefit from the war through increased payouts. •Negative long-term outlook: He warns that the current path is unsustainable and could lead to a full-scale industrial and financial crisis, as the economy is "eating itself" by consuming its remaining pre-war reserves and exhausting its resources.

Beefeater

18,351 次观看 • 9 个月前

🇮🇷🇺🇸The economic and military backbone of the Iranian regime has just been systematically severed—as catastrophic U.S. precision airstrikes completely isolate the country’s most vital maritime chokepoint, plunging Tehran into an existential crisis. According to an explosive report by The Telegraph, devastating U.S. Air Force strikes have obliterated the critical bridge and rail networks connecting the strategic port city of Bandar Abbas to the rest of Iran. The relentless bombardment has effectively transformed the city of 500,000—which single-handedly handles nearly half of the entire nation’s international trade—into an isolated island. Crucially, the offensive has trapped Iran’s primary naval headquarters within the city limits. This vital naval hub, which dictates Tehran's ability to project power and threaten the global energy flow through the Strait of Hormuz, is now being methodically dismantled by routine American airstrikes pounding the facility two to three times every single day. This operation represents a masterclass in strategic paralysis, effectively breaking Iran’s back without the need for a ground invasion. By severing Bandar Abbas from the mainland and reducing its premier naval base to rubble on a daily routine, the U.S. has simultaneously choked off Iran’s economic lifeblood and neutralized its ability to hold the global economy hostage via the Strait of Hormuz. This devastating interdiction campaign proves that Tehran's aggressive regional posturing has backfired catastrophically—leaving the regime economically suffocated, militarily castrated, and utterly powerless to stop the systematic destruction of its core strategic assets.

NSTRIKE

150,605 次观看 • 1 个月前

👇 This is an important window into how Iran is viewing the current diplomatic track. A post-Islamabad interview with Majid Shakeri, an advisor to Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, who led Iran’s delegation in Islamabad and headed talks with JD Vance. It offers a revealing look into how the Iranian side, especially Ghalibaf’s camp, is assessing the process. He says the first round was fundamentally about each side evaluating the other. But he highlights a core “problem” with the US delegation: “it neither has clear goals nor does it have the necessary mandate and the necessary ability for decision-making.” At the same time, he claims that for everything raised, “a solution truly existed.” His overall assessment of the round is telling: it was “not completely failed or completely won,” and no one expected that in a single round, a “result would immediately be created.” On escalation, he addresses Trump’s blockade threat. He says it is unclear whether it is a bluff or not. But in either case, he suggests it does not fundamentally alter Iran’s position, where the Strait of Hormuz remains its key leverage. More striking is his description of Iran’s economic posture. He argues Iran has long prepared for a blockade scenario. With imports reduced during the war, it now has more resources and liquidity, including proceeds from oil sold at sea. And this line stands out: “parallel to the war” the “the sale of Iranian oil no longer has any connection to the Dirham or any type of infrastructure susceptible to sanctions or American pressure.” If true, that is a significant shift given Iran’s previous dependence on UAE-linked financial channels. He adds that oil trade and currency exchange are now happening at the point of sale, for example in China. He also points to a broader logistical shift, saying Iran has diversified away from southern and western routes toward land-based and other alternatives, and that this transition is already complete for vital goods. On a wider geopolitical level, he argues a US blockade would “expand the game” by pulling in China more directly, ultimately to Iran’s benefit. He also notes that pressure on the Strait of Hormuz and shifts toward Red Sea export routes increase the leverage of actors like the Houthis. His closing assessment is blunt. He characterizes US decision-making currently as irrational and argues Washington is pursuing a path that raises costs for both sides while making the situation more entrenched and difficult to resolve.

Sina Toossi

66,659 次观看 • 4 个月前

China is not dumping cheap goods into a thriving global economy. It is dumping them into a Europe that is already on its knees. France contracted. German industry is in deep depression. Household spending is absent. Energy costs remain a serious threat. Banks are buying government bonds at crisis-like speeds because they are more worried about recession than inflation. That is the receiving end of China's export surge. Here is the structure of the problem. China built massive industrial capacity in the 1990s and 2000s on the assumption that global growth would never stop. When 2008 proved that wrong, the capacity remained. It never went away. Electric vehicles. Batteries. Solar. Steel. Advanced manufacturing. Beijing did not build these industries by accident. They are the national development strategy, the industries of the future, funded cheaply, subsidized quietly, and backed by state banks. From Beijing's perspective, exports are not a choice right now. They are a pressure valve. If China slows exports, factory utilization drops. Producer prices weaken again. Corporate profits fall. Employment risk rises. Local government revenues, already stressed, take another hit. Banks, already fragile, take more damage. Exports are the only remaining release valve. But Europe is not receiving this from a position of strength. It already watched Chinese competition hollow out its solar industry. It does not want to watch the same movie in EVs, batteries, and wind components. Two economic blocs, both under pressure, both with limited options, pointed directly at each other. That is the trade war. Not a negotiation. A collision.

Jeffrey P. Snider

24,071 次观看 • 1 个月前