Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

🇺🇸🇮🇷 IS ISRAEL DRAGGING THE U.S. INTO ANOTHER FOREVER WAR? This debate between Cenk Uygur and IDF’s Jonathan Conricus got very very heated. I’ve never seen Cenk so upset The discussion started with a focus on the imminent war with Iran, and whether it is in America’s best interest...

MarioNawfal's profile picture

Mario Nawfal

3,490,762 subscribers

521,913 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & PolitikGesundheit & Wellness
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Are U.S. and Israeli goals in Iran diverging? “For Israel, Iran is a regional adversary… and they want Iran to collapse… But Iran’s collapse is not in America’s interest. We did have an interest in Iran not developing a nuclear weapon, but we could have achieved that diplomatically… So I think that there is a divergence of interest between Israel and the U.S.” The American Conservative senior editor Andrew Day argues the United States’ and Israel’s interests in Iran are diverging, as Israel seeks regime collapse while the U.S. prefers stability and cooperation. Watch The Matt Gaetz Show on YouTube TV Today!
2:09

Are U.S. and Israeli goals in Iran diverging? “For Israel, Iran is a regional adversary… and they want Iran to collapse… But Iran’s collapse is not in America’s interest. We did have an interest in Iran not developing a nuclear weapon, but we could have achieved that diplomatically… So I think that there is a divergence of interest between Israel and the U.S.” The American Conservative senior editor Andrew Day argues the United States’ and Israel’s interests in Iran are diverging, as Israel seeks regime collapse while the U.S. prefers stability and cooperation. Watch The Matt Gaetz Show on YouTube TV Today!

One America News

22,300 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

🚨 NEW: Trump says the U.S. struck Iran because, if he “didn’t hit them first,” Tehran would have “taken over the Middle East” and attacked Israel. Speaking to reporters today, President Trump said Iran was planning to “take over the Middle East” with its “thousands of missiles” and “try and destroy Israel” — two of the three justifications he cited for launching the U.S.-Israeli regime change war against Iran on February 28. Trump also claimed Iran was pursuing nuclear weapons, saying Iranian negotiators had effectively told Washington: “We want to continue to build nuclear weapons.” Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi posted on X in the days before the first U.S. strike that Iran will “under no circumstances ever develop a nuclear weapon,” a position also confirmed by Oman’s foreign minister, who was mediating the talks. Since coming to power in the 1979 revolution, Iran’s regime has not initiated a war against another state, but it has supported armed groups resisting Israel’s occupation and expansion.
0:52

🚨 NEW: Trump says the U.S. struck Iran because, if he “didn’t hit them first,” Tehran would have “taken over the Middle East” and attacked Israel. Speaking to reporters today, President Trump said Iran was planning to “take over the Middle East” with its “thousands of missiles” and “try and destroy Israel” — two of the three justifications he cited for launching the U.S.-Israeli regime change war against Iran on February 28. Trump also claimed Iran was pursuing nuclear weapons, saying Iranian negotiators had effectively told Washington: “We want to continue to build nuclear weapons.” Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi posted on X in the days before the first U.S. strike that Iran will “under no circumstances ever develop a nuclear weapon,” a position also confirmed by Oman’s foreign minister, who was mediating the talks. Since coming to power in the 1979 revolution, Iran’s regime has not initiated a war against another state, but it has supported armed groups resisting Israel’s occupation and expansion.

Drop Site

80,364 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

INTERVIEW: The UAE was dragged into a war it never wanted, and despite being a close trading partner with Iran, it was attacked more than any other nation The outcome? Pulling out of OPEC, closer cooperation with the U.S. and Israel, and a visit by the Crown Prince to China UAE Prof Abdulkhaleq Abdulla also warned the war is not over: “There’s a 50% chance the war resumes” We discuss how a resumption of the war would look like, how the UAE is preparing for such an event, and most importantly: What the region will look like once the war ends Abdulkhaleq Abdulla - U.S. -Israel war, not UAE’s choice - Gulf’s history of wars and UAE resilience - UAE-U.S. relationship and self-defense strategy - Iran as UAE’s top security threat - Why Iran is viewed as an enemy of the UAE - Why UAE was attacked more than others - Dubai/UAE as a global hub and symbolic target - Blame for the war: Iran vs. U.S. - Was going to war the right decision? - Military results of the 40-day war - UAE defense diversification beyond the U.S. - China vs. America in UAE strategy - UAE-Iran trade relationship - UAE leaving OPEC and the “new UAE” - Risk of a second round of war with Iran
39:56

INTERVIEW: The UAE was dragged into a war it never wanted, and despite being a close trading partner with Iran, it was attacked more than any other nation The outcome? Pulling out of OPEC, closer cooperation with the U.S. and Israel, and a visit by the Crown Prince to China UAE Prof Abdulkhaleq Abdulla also warned the war is not over: “There’s a 50% chance the war resumes” We discuss how a resumption of the war would look like, how the UAE is preparing for such an event, and most importantly: What the region will look like once the war ends Abdulkhaleq Abdulla - U.S. -Israel war, not UAE’s choice - Gulf’s history of wars and UAE resilience - UAE-U.S. relationship and self-defense strategy - Iran as UAE’s top security threat - Why Iran is viewed as an enemy of the UAE - Why UAE was attacked more than others - Dubai/UAE as a global hub and symbolic target - Blame for the war: Iran vs. U.S. - Was going to war the right decision? - Military results of the 40-day war - UAE defense diversification beyond the U.S. - China vs. America in UAE strategy - UAE-Iran trade relationship - UAE leaving OPEC and the “new UAE” - Risk of a second round of war with Iran

Mario Nawfal

545,138 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

🇮🇱 🇮🇷 Israel may be forced to act alone against Iran: Israel Hayom, a prominent Israeli newspaper often aligned with government views published an article today that was interesting. The article argues that any U.S.-Iran nuclear agreement must explicitly limit Iran's ballistic missile production, stockpiling and capabilities. Failing to take necessary measures would leave Israel vulnerable to an existential threat posed by Iran's missiles, which can transport nuclear warheads if Iran moves forward with its program, regardless of any nuclear constraints. In the event that a new deal fails to address missiles, Israel would be left with no option but to unilaterally attack Iranian missile facilities or related infrastructure to neutralize the threat, even without U.S. assistance. I see it as unlikely that the U.S. and Iran will come to an agreement in the negotiations. I usually don't focus so much on what is conveyed through the media but more on what reinforcements the U.S. is sending to the region. Given that, it is obvious that the U.S. is preparing for war.
0:22

🇮🇱 🇮🇷 Israel may be forced to act alone against Iran: Israel Hayom, a prominent Israeli newspaper often aligned with government views published an article today that was interesting. The article argues that any U.S.-Iran nuclear agreement must explicitly limit Iran's ballistic missile production, stockpiling and capabilities. Failing to take necessary measures would leave Israel vulnerable to an existential threat posed by Iran's missiles, which can transport nuclear warheads if Iran moves forward with its program, regardless of any nuclear constraints. In the event that a new deal fails to address missiles, Israel would be left with no option but to unilaterally attack Iranian missile facilities or related infrastructure to neutralize the threat, even without U.S. assistance. I see it as unlikely that the U.S. and Iran will come to an agreement in the negotiations. I usually don't focus so much on what is conveyed through the media but more on what reinforcements the U.S. is sending to the region. Given that, it is obvious that the U.S. is preparing for war.

WORLD AT WAR

24,074 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Israel launched a defensive and preemptive strike against Iran’s nuclear operations. Here’s what we know so far. Israel targeted Iran’s nuclear sites, their ballistic missile programs, nuclear infrastructure, engineers, and nuclear scientists, and its top military commanders, including the Chief of Staff and the head of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard, a US designated terrorist organization that arms and funds groups like Hamas, Hezbollah, and the Houthis. These attacks unfolded in over five waves and at over 100 quality targets in operations that included aircrafts and additional on the ground intelligence activity. This is not a war between Israel and the Iranian people. This is a fight to stop a terrorist regime from acquiring the most dangerous weapon on earth. According to the IAEA, the UN nuclear watchdog, Iran is now capable of producing up to 15 nuclear bombs. In the last few months and while pretending to negotiate a deal with the US in good faith, Iran has accelerated its nuclear enrichment and weapons program. Iran is the head of the Middle Eastern snake. Their fingerprints can be found in every single bloody conflict in the region. Iran is the greatest sponsor of terrorism in the world and their regime oppresses their own people with their Islamist ideology. Israel cannot allow Iran to have a nuclear weapon. The Middle East cannot allow Iran to have a nuclear weapon. Because a nuclear Iran doesn’t just threaten Israel, it threatens the entire world.
1:33

Israel launched a defensive and preemptive strike against Iran’s nuclear operations. Here’s what we know so far. Israel targeted Iran’s nuclear sites, their ballistic missile programs, nuclear infrastructure, engineers, and nuclear scientists, and its top military commanders, including the Chief of Staff and the head of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard, a US designated terrorist organization that arms and funds groups like Hamas, Hezbollah, and the Houthis. These attacks unfolded in over five waves and at over 100 quality targets in operations that included aircrafts and additional on the ground intelligence activity. This is not a war between Israel and the Iranian people. This is a fight to stop a terrorist regime from acquiring the most dangerous weapon on earth. According to the IAEA, the UN nuclear watchdog, Iran is now capable of producing up to 15 nuclear bombs. In the last few months and while pretending to negotiate a deal with the US in good faith, Iran has accelerated its nuclear enrichment and weapons program. Iran is the head of the Middle Eastern snake. Their fingerprints can be found in every single bloody conflict in the region. Iran is the greatest sponsor of terrorism in the world and their regime oppresses their own people with their Islamist ideology. Israel cannot allow Iran to have a nuclear weapon. The Middle East cannot allow Iran to have a nuclear weapon. Because a nuclear Iran doesn’t just threaten Israel, it threatens the entire world.

Noa Tishby

24,122 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Long read: Iran is a victim of decades of injustice perpetrated by the US and the UK in an effort to control Irans oil. They couped the democratically elected leader of Iran in 1953 and installed a US puppet until the Iranian revolution in 1979. Over 500,000 Iranians have died in the US-Iraq war against Iran. Even more died because of US sanctions. Iran is not a terrorist state. Iran has been forced to defend itself against regime change efforts and colonial aggression from the US and their satellites in the Middle East. The Iranians should be applauded for aiding the Palestinian people in their struggle against the illegal occupation by Israel and decades of injustice, theft and dehumanization. Iran has a long history of standing up to bullies. The Persians have fought the Romans, the Turks and the Mongols. Survival is deeply encoded in the Iranian DNA. A war with Iran would be a massive miscalculation by Israel and the US. Iran has prepared for this war. It has a formidable army and a significant arsenal of long range ballistic and hypersonic missiles. Russia and China would support Iran in a war against the US and Israel. Ukraine in reverse. With the big difference that the US can never defeat Iran unlike Russia which is currently destroying the Ukrainian army and its NATO equipment in the US proxy war. The Rand corporation should have titled its infamous warmongering research paper more accurately: ‘Overextending and Unbalancing America and the EU.’ A war against Iran would result in an acceleration of the inevitable decline of US empire and the destruction of Israel. The risk of Israel utilizing nuclear weapons against Iran is significant. It would not lead to victory but to global condemnation and punishment against the Jewish people. Whoever is in charge of the US Govt right now should establish urgent client control and stop the mass murdering war criminal Benjamin Netanyahu - בנימין נתניהו before it’s too late. Jews everywhere should demand the resignation of this lunatic for the purpose of self preservation. Watch the video below to understand that the so called ‘terrorists’ in Iran are simply the victims of endless bullying and deserve nothing but respect from any fair minded person. Resisting evil bullies who want to steal your natural resources is not terrorism.
13:40

Long read: Iran is a victim of decades of injustice perpetrated by the US and the UK in an effort to control Irans oil. They couped the democratically elected leader of Iran in 1953 and installed a US puppet until the Iranian revolution in 1979. Over 500,000 Iranians have died in the US-Iraq war against Iran. Even more died because of US sanctions. Iran is not a terrorist state. Iran has been forced to defend itself against regime change efforts and colonial aggression from the US and their satellites in the Middle East. The Iranians should be applauded for aiding the Palestinian people in their struggle against the illegal occupation by Israel and decades of injustice, theft and dehumanization. Iran has a long history of standing up to bullies. The Persians have fought the Romans, the Turks and the Mongols. Survival is deeply encoded in the Iranian DNA. A war with Iran would be a massive miscalculation by Israel and the US. Iran has prepared for this war. It has a formidable army and a significant arsenal of long range ballistic and hypersonic missiles. Russia and China would support Iran in a war against the US and Israel. Ukraine in reverse. With the big difference that the US can never defeat Iran unlike Russia which is currently destroying the Ukrainian army and its NATO equipment in the US proxy war. The Rand corporation should have titled its infamous warmongering research paper more accurately: ‘Overextending and Unbalancing America and the EU.’ A war against Iran would result in an acceleration of the inevitable decline of US empire and the destruction of Israel. The risk of Israel utilizing nuclear weapons against Iran is significant. It would not lead to victory but to global condemnation and punishment against the Jewish people. Whoever is in charge of the US Govt right now should establish urgent client control and stop the mass murdering war criminal Benjamin Netanyahu - בנימין נתניהו before it’s too late. Jews everywhere should demand the resignation of this lunatic for the purpose of self preservation. Watch the video below to understand that the so called ‘terrorists’ in Iran are simply the victims of endless bullying and deserve nothing but respect from any fair minded person. Resisting evil bullies who want to steal your natural resources is not terrorism.

Kim Dotcom

482,988 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

HARRISON BERGER: WE GET NOTHING FROM THE ISRAELIS, AND THEY TAKE EVERYTHING FROM US. INCLUDING WHO WE ARE AS PEOPLE Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich says Israel has no interest in joining U.S. military operations against Iran, calling a conflict limited to the U.S. and Iran “best for us.” America sends Israel billions in military aid, links its military infrastructure ever more closely with Israel’s, and risks sending U.S. troops to fight and die in a war tied to Israeli security interests. Yet Israel’s government signals it would rather direct the conflict from the sidelines than put its own forces into it. What does that say about the U.S.–Israel relationship? Is America acting as a sovereign nation, or as a country whose foreign policy has been captured by another state’s priorities? Harrison Berger joins us to break it down.
2:31

HARRISON BERGER: WE GET NOTHING FROM THE ISRAELIS, AND THEY TAKE EVERYTHING FROM US. INCLUDING WHO WE ARE AS PEOPLE Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich says Israel has no interest in joining U.S. military operations against Iran, calling a conflict limited to the U.S. and Iran “best for us.” America sends Israel billions in military aid, links its military infrastructure ever more closely with Israel’s, and risks sending U.S. troops to fight and die in a war tied to Israeli security interests. Yet Israel’s government signals it would rather direct the conflict from the sidelines than put its own forces into it. What does that say about the U.S.–Israel relationship? Is America acting as a sovereign nation, or as a country whose foreign policy has been captured by another state’s priorities? Harrison Berger joins us to break it down.

Redacted

12,361 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

#WATCH | Tel Aviv, Israel | Former Spokesman for the State of Israel, Eylon Levy says, "It's clear that the Iranian regime has lost the war. It lost its entire leadership in the first few seconds of the war. Since then, Israel and the United States have been systematically destroying the Iranian regime's ability to continue threatening its neighbours. We've seen how Iran has been firing missiles and drones into civilian areas, airports, energy, and infrastructure. Israel and the U.S. are systematically destroying that ability. But the Iranians are laughing in the face of the United States. They're rejecting negotiations. They think they are in a place to insist on demands. This is not over because the Iranian regime is not interested in stopping being a threat to its neighbours. It's not interested in stopping its nuclear program, ballistic missiles, support for proxy armies that have caused violence and terrorism across the region..."
1:07

#WATCH | Tel Aviv, Israel | Former Spokesman for the State of Israel, Eylon Levy says, "It's clear that the Iranian regime has lost the war. It lost its entire leadership in the first few seconds of the war. Since then, Israel and the United States have been systematically destroying the Iranian regime's ability to continue threatening its neighbours. We've seen how Iran has been firing missiles and drones into civilian areas, airports, energy, and infrastructure. Israel and the U.S. are systematically destroying that ability. But the Iranians are laughing in the face of the United States. They're rejecting negotiations. They think they are in a place to insist on demands. This is not over because the Iranian regime is not interested in stopping being a threat to its neighbours. It's not interested in stopping its nuclear program, ballistic missiles, support for proxy armies that have caused violence and terrorism across the region..."

ANI

15,099 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Noam Chomsky explains why the US🇺🇸 government, Israel, and the media never acknowledge Israel’s nukes: If the US were to recognise Israel as a state with nuclear weapons, US aid to Israel would be ILLEGAL since they were developed outside of international legal frameworks. The absurd assumption behind the US’ negotiating position is that Iran would somehow just willingly give up its nuclear program and missile program… Meaning it would have no deterrent against an Israel that is armed with nuclear weapons, that launched two wars against it in a single year. While the US demands Iran has no deterrent, according to Washington, Israel is allowed to keep its nuclear Sword of Damocles hanging over Iran and the entire region.
3:06

Noam Chomsky explains why the US🇺🇸 government, Israel, and the media never acknowledge Israel’s nukes: If the US were to recognise Israel as a state with nuclear weapons, US aid to Israel would be ILLEGAL since they were developed outside of international legal frameworks. The absurd assumption behind the US’ negotiating position is that Iran would somehow just willingly give up its nuclear program and missile program… Meaning it would have no deterrent against an Israel that is armed with nuclear weapons, that launched two wars against it in a single year. While the US demands Iran has no deterrent, according to Washington, Israel is allowed to keep its nuclear Sword of Damocles hanging over Iran and the entire region.

Afshin Rattansi

18,421 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

🇺🇸🇮🇷 INTERVIEW: HEATED DEBATE ON WHETHER THE U.S. SHOULD STRIKE IRAN Tensions are rising fast, military options are on the table, and the debate over deterrence versus escalation is reaching a boiling point. NYT Best Seller Joel Rosenberg argues Iran has spent decades funding armed proxy groups that kill Americans and U.S. allies, says diplomacy has failed, and supports a large but limited strike to punish the regime without triggering full-scale war. He frames military action as necessary to protect U.S. credibility, allies in the region, and to stop Iran’s missile capabilities from growing unchecked. Prof. Glenn Diesen rejects that outright, warning any strike would escalate the conflict, push Iran toward nuclear deterrence, and risk a regional war driven by security competition. Glenn accuses Washington of ignoring Iran’s security concerns, while Joel fires back that Glenn is excusing one of the world’s most brutal regimes. Enjoy this conversation with Glenn Diesen and Joel C. Rosenberg 01:15 - Should the U.S. attack Iran? Trump’s 3 options. 02:53 - Prediction: Trump will choose a “large but limited strike.” 03:41 - Regime change via air power alone: Practical military limitations vs political goals. 06:48 - Ethnic fragmentation risks of Iranian regime collapse. 07:31 - Iran would respond “all out” to any strike. 10:42 - Who started hostilities? 1953 coup vs embassy takeover. 12:35 - Failures of past U.S. interventions (Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan). 15:49 - Does Iran need to be an enemy of the U.S.? 16:05 - Israel, Iran, the U.S., and targeting. 20:34 - Were Iraq/Afghanistan “successful”? Success vs moral cost. 23:05 - Is the U.S. the problem? 28:15 - Nuclear facilities strike vs diplomacy argument. 32:54 - Ballistic missiles vs nuclear weapons as the real threat. 38:21 - Is Israel a threat to Gulf Nations? 45:54 - Israeli Foreign Policy, Law, and its ties to Arabs and Iran. 57:48 - End-of-year predictions for Iran and regional escalation.
1:04:08

🇺🇸🇮🇷 INTERVIEW: HEATED DEBATE ON WHETHER THE U.S. SHOULD STRIKE IRAN Tensions are rising fast, military options are on the table, and the debate over deterrence versus escalation is reaching a boiling point. NYT Best Seller Joel Rosenberg argues Iran has spent decades funding armed proxy groups that kill Americans and U.S. allies, says diplomacy has failed, and supports a large but limited strike to punish the regime without triggering full-scale war. He frames military action as necessary to protect U.S. credibility, allies in the region, and to stop Iran’s missile capabilities from growing unchecked. Prof. Glenn Diesen rejects that outright, warning any strike would escalate the conflict, push Iran toward nuclear deterrence, and risk a regional war driven by security competition. Glenn accuses Washington of ignoring Iran’s security concerns, while Joel fires back that Glenn is excusing one of the world’s most brutal regimes. Enjoy this conversation with Glenn Diesen and Joel C. Rosenberg 01:15 - Should the U.S. attack Iran? Trump’s 3 options. 02:53 - Prediction: Trump will choose a “large but limited strike.” 03:41 - Regime change via air power alone: Practical military limitations vs political goals. 06:48 - Ethnic fragmentation risks of Iranian regime collapse. 07:31 - Iran would respond “all out” to any strike. 10:42 - Who started hostilities? 1953 coup vs embassy takeover. 12:35 - Failures of past U.S. interventions (Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan). 15:49 - Does Iran need to be an enemy of the U.S.? 16:05 - Israel, Iran, the U.S., and targeting. 20:34 - Were Iraq/Afghanistan “successful”? Success vs moral cost. 23:05 - Is the U.S. the problem? 28:15 - Nuclear facilities strike vs diplomacy argument. 32:54 - Ballistic missiles vs nuclear weapons as the real threat. 38:21 - Is Israel a threat to Gulf Nations? 45:54 - Israeli Foreign Policy, Law, and its ties to Arabs and Iran. 57:48 - End-of-year predictions for Iran and regional escalation.

Mario Nawfal

1,798,098 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Day 26 Iran war summary: -NYT confirms all U.S. bases destroyed -Iran has confirms all U.S. bases wiped -Iran has rejected Trump’s ceasefire -Trump is desperate for a ceasefire -Mayor of Margaliot cries on tv, begs -Israeli AD keeps failing, WAPO -Straight of Hormuz remains closed -EU will suffer economically from war -WSJ: US will attempt ground invasion -US will try & invade an Iranian island -Iran has shot down another F-18 -Iran makes 400 drones/day, used 3000 -Iran promises main course yet to come -Qatar begging for better Iran relations -Netanyahu disappointed in Mossad -Israeli is striking Gaza tents -Trump coping, negotiating with himself. -Iran war threatens kosher $ dominance Foreign minister Dr. Abbas Araghchi: -This is neither Iran’s war nor America’s war; rather, Israel has pushed the U.S. toward it. -The U.S. prioritizes Israel’s security, and its bases in the region are meant to protect Tel Aviv; Washington is willing to sacrifice everything for Israel’s security. -Israel’s goal is to achieve the “Greater Israel project,” which includes territories of some countries in the region.
0:46

Day 26 Iran war summary: -NYT confirms all U.S. bases destroyed -Iran has confirms all U.S. bases wiped -Iran has rejected Trump’s ceasefire -Trump is desperate for a ceasefire -Mayor of Margaliot cries on tv, begs -Israeli AD keeps failing, WAPO -Straight of Hormuz remains closed -EU will suffer economically from war -WSJ: US will attempt ground invasion -US will try & invade an Iranian island -Iran has shot down another F-18 -Iran makes 400 drones/day, used 3000 -Iran promises main course yet to come -Qatar begging for better Iran relations -Netanyahu disappointed in Mossad -Israeli is striking Gaza tents -Trump coping, negotiating with himself. -Iran war threatens kosher $ dominance Foreign minister Dr. Abbas Araghchi: -This is neither Iran’s war nor America’s war; rather, Israel has pushed the U.S. toward it. -The U.S. prioritizes Israel’s security, and its bases in the region are meant to protect Tel Aviv; Washington is willing to sacrifice everything for Israel’s security. -Israel’s goal is to achieve the “Greater Israel project,” which includes territories of some countries in the region.

Truth_teller 🇷🇺

57,292 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

🚨🇺🇸🇮🇷 EXCLUSIVE: Tehran University Professor Foad Izadi warned me not to fall trap to the Western narrative that the war is over, and that Iran is preparing for a continuation of the war The discussion shook me, as it gave me a glimpse to a completely different narrative in Iran, one of distrust, anger and preparedness for the worse Foad told me that Trump’s objective of controlling the Strait of Hormuz has not been completed, and therefore the war is more likely to continue than to have ended He’s seen this playbook before: Negotiations used to disguise preparations for war. And the additional troops Trump has sent to the region fuel this fear We also had a heated discussion about Hezbollah’s role in all this, debating whether the group acts in the interests of Lebanon or Iran, and what the future holds for the Israel-Lebanon ceasefire Here’s what we talked about: •⁠ ⁠Whether the true objective of the war was Iran’s nuclear program, securing influence over global oil flows, or leverage against China •⁠ ⁠Why Foad thinks the odds of war resuming are still alarmingly high despite Trump’s recent comments •⁠ ⁠Why he believes Hezbollah is acting in Lebanon’s interests, not as a simple Iranian proxy •⁠ ⁠Whether any real U.S.-Iran deal is possible when Congress, sanctions law, and Netanyahu still shape the playing field فواد ایزدی Foad Izadi 00:00 – Iranian influence vs. Lebanese sovereignty in the Hezbollah conflict 02:14 – Analyzing the "Regime Change" narrative and Trump's influence on Iranian policy 05:32 – The proxy debate: are Hezbollah and regional militias independent actors? 09:45 – Escalation risks: the potential for direct military conflict between Israel and Iran 13:20 – Economic impact: how sanctions and regional instability affect the Iranian public 17:55 – Diplomatic deadlocks: the challenges of reviving international nuclear agreements 21:12 – Misinformation and the media war: how both sides shape the regional narrative 25:40 – US foreign policy: the role of the Israeli lobby and Washington’s strategic goals 30:15 – Regional alliances: Iran’s relationship with neighboring Gulf states and Russia 34:50 – The "Two-State" vs. "One-State" solution: debating the future of Palestine 39:12 – Internal Iranian politics: the evolution of the regime under international pressure 43:25 – Youth perspectives: shift in American public opinion regarding the Middle East 47:33 – Closing reflections on historical precedents and the path to regional peace
48:09

🚨🇺🇸🇮🇷 EXCLUSIVE: Tehran University Professor Foad Izadi warned me not to fall trap to the Western narrative that the war is over, and that Iran is preparing for a continuation of the war The discussion shook me, as it gave me a glimpse to a completely different narrative in Iran, one of distrust, anger and preparedness for the worse Foad told me that Trump’s objective of controlling the Strait of Hormuz has not been completed, and therefore the war is more likely to continue than to have ended He’s seen this playbook before: Negotiations used to disguise preparations for war. And the additional troops Trump has sent to the region fuel this fear We also had a heated discussion about Hezbollah’s role in all this, debating whether the group acts in the interests of Lebanon or Iran, and what the future holds for the Israel-Lebanon ceasefire Here’s what we talked about: •⁠ ⁠Whether the true objective of the war was Iran’s nuclear program, securing influence over global oil flows, or leverage against China •⁠ ⁠Why Foad thinks the odds of war resuming are still alarmingly high despite Trump’s recent comments •⁠ ⁠Why he believes Hezbollah is acting in Lebanon’s interests, not as a simple Iranian proxy •⁠ ⁠Whether any real U.S.-Iran deal is possible when Congress, sanctions law, and Netanyahu still shape the playing field فواد ایزدی Foad Izadi 00:00 – Iranian influence vs. Lebanese sovereignty in the Hezbollah conflict 02:14 – Analyzing the "Regime Change" narrative and Trump's influence on Iranian policy 05:32 – The proxy debate: are Hezbollah and regional militias independent actors? 09:45 – Escalation risks: the potential for direct military conflict between Israel and Iran 13:20 – Economic impact: how sanctions and regional instability affect the Iranian public 17:55 – Diplomatic deadlocks: the challenges of reviving international nuclear agreements 21:12 – Misinformation and the media war: how both sides shape the regional narrative 25:40 – US foreign policy: the role of the Israeli lobby and Washington’s strategic goals 30:15 – Regional alliances: Iran’s relationship with neighboring Gulf states and Russia 34:50 – The "Two-State" vs. "One-State" solution: debating the future of Palestine 39:12 – Internal Iranian politics: the evolution of the regime under international pressure 43:25 – Youth perspectives: shift in American public opinion regarding the Middle East 47:33 – Closing reflections on historical precedents and the path to regional peace

Mario Nawfal

461,856 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten