Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Is it possible that Israel has leverage over U.S. officials—potentially through kompromat networks like Epstein—to push America toward a war with Iran? I’m not presenting this as a proven fact. I’m saying the shift in tone, the shift in deployments, and the political logic make you wonder what’s happening...

KevorkAlmassian's profile picture

Kevork Almassian

164,716 subscribers

14,831 views • 4 months ago •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

🇮🇷🇮🇱 TRITA PARSI: “ISRAEL CANNOT START A WAR WITH IRAN WITHOUT U.S. INVOLVEMENT” Parsi says Israel’s ability to escalate against Iran is limited without U.S. backing, and that Washington’s role should shift from enabling conflict to helping build an inclusive regional peace framework. Trita Parsi: "The Israelis cannot commit that type of a war against Iran without American involvement. The U.S. provides so much of the defense of Israel against Iranian missiles that it needs to be put in place before the war, not after. If this peace deal succeeds, the administration should move forward with a larger peace agreement that would include Iran and essentially everyone."
4:21

🇮🇷🇮🇱 TRITA PARSI: “ISRAEL CANNOT START A WAR WITH IRAN WITHOUT U.S. INVOLVEMENT” Parsi says Israel’s ability to escalate against Iran is limited without U.S. backing, and that Washington’s role should shift from enabling conflict to helping build an inclusive regional peace framework. Trita Parsi: "The Israelis cannot commit that type of a war against Iran without American involvement. The U.S. provides so much of the defense of Israel against Iranian missiles that it needs to be put in place before the war, not after. If this peace deal succeeds, the administration should move forward with a larger peace agreement that would include Iran and essentially everyone."

Mario Nawfal

90,414 views • 9 months ago

🚨 Iran War BOMBSHELL: Former CIA Larry Johnson exposes Trump's trap 🚨 Trump and his media allies routinely tells the American public we are winning the war with Iran and that all is going according to play. But Larry argues the truth: "Iran’s has the West in a very difficult position." "Iran has never had this kind of leverage over the United States and Western Europe ever in its history." The only reason they have such leverage over the U.S. is because the White House *chose* to launch a war we did not need, that we now likely cannot win at an acceptable cost - and in so doing, have handed enormous leverage to Tehran they otherwise would never have had: control of the Strait of Hormuz and with it, the ability to turn off the tap of 20% of global oil production. This is the gravity of the Iran crisis – leverage shifted dramatically. Trump's war handed Tehran unprecedented Gulf control. Watch NOW 👉 [ 👉 #IranWar #TrumpIran #PersianGulf #IranLeverage #MiddleEast #Geopolitics #LarryJohnson
1:08

🚨 Iran War BOMBSHELL: Former CIA Larry Johnson exposes Trump's trap 🚨 Trump and his media allies routinely tells the American public we are winning the war with Iran and that all is going according to play. But Larry argues the truth: "Iran’s has the West in a very difficult position." "Iran has never had this kind of leverage over the United States and Western Europe ever in its history." The only reason they have such leverage over the U.S. is because the White House *chose* to launch a war we did not need, that we now likely cannot win at an acceptable cost - and in so doing, have handed enormous leverage to Tehran they otherwise would never have had: control of the Strait of Hormuz and with it, the ability to turn off the tap of 20% of global oil production. This is the gravity of the Iran crisis – leverage shifted dramatically. Trump's war handed Tehran unprecedented Gulf control. Watch NOW 👉 [ 👉 #IranWar #TrumpIran #PersianGulf #IranLeverage #MiddleEast #Geopolitics #LarryJohnson

Daniel Davis Deep Dive

46,552 views • 4 months ago

Sen. Chris Murphy (D-CT), who has been strongly critical of Trump’s war on Iran, told Drop Site’s Julian Andreone that the United States “should have leverage over Israel” — not the other way around: “Everything Israel does is made possible by U.S. support and weapons. Israel should not be telling us when to wage war on Iran. What kind of partnership is this?” Julian Andreone | Chris Murphy 🟧
1:26

Sen. Chris Murphy (D-CT), who has been strongly critical of Trump’s war on Iran, told Drop Site’s Julian Andreone that the United States “should have leverage over Israel” — not the other way around: “Everything Israel does is made possible by U.S. support and weapons. Israel should not be telling us when to wage war on Iran. What kind of partnership is this?” Julian Andreone | Chris Murphy 🟧

Drop Site

111,576 views • 4 months ago

Everyone is talking about the war with Iran—but the real question is what happens after victory. In this clip, I explain why history matters. From the Battle of Yorktown and the French alliance in the American Revolutionary War to the lessons of World War I and World War II, winning a war requires more than military success—it requires a strategy for what comes next. If we ignore that lesson with Iran, the Middle East, and U.S. national security, we risk repeating the mistakes that created chaos and global conflict before. Rumble: YouTube:
11:07

Everyone is talking about the war with Iran—but the real question is what happens after victory. In this clip, I explain why history matters. From the Battle of Yorktown and the French alliance in the American Revolutionary War to the lessons of World War I and World War II, winning a war requires more than military success—it requires a strategy for what comes next. If we ignore that lesson with Iran, the Middle East, and U.S. national security, we risk repeating the mistakes that created chaos and global conflict before. Rumble: YouTube:

Mark R. Levin

139,944 views • 4 months ago

Jiang Xueqin says that this war allows Israel to remake the Middle East in its own image: "If you look at the main beneficiary of this war, it is Israel because Israel has an ambition called the Greater Israel Project." "If you look at what's happening, well, it's convenient in that the GCC is being destroyed." "Saudi Arabia will probably be drawn into this war. It is possible Turkey will be drawn into this war as, as well." "And this war allows Israel to remake the Middle East in its own image." "The main constraint to Israel achieving the Greater Israel Project is actually not Iran, but America, because America guarantees the military safety and protection of the GCC." "And so if Israel is, is becoming dominant... it needs to figure out how to remove America from the equation." "This war has shown the limitations of American power. It's annoyed the American people. The American people do not want this war." "It's very possible that regardless of what happens in this war, America is forced to withdraw from the Middle East, in which case Israel is able to achieve its Greater Israel Project." Tucker Carlson Jiang Xueqin
1:51

Jiang Xueqin says that this war allows Israel to remake the Middle East in its own image: "If you look at the main beneficiary of this war, it is Israel because Israel has an ambition called the Greater Israel Project." "If you look at what's happening, well, it's convenient in that the GCC is being destroyed." "Saudi Arabia will probably be drawn into this war. It is possible Turkey will be drawn into this war as, as well." "And this war allows Israel to remake the Middle East in its own image." "The main constraint to Israel achieving the Greater Israel Project is actually not Iran, but America, because America guarantees the military safety and protection of the GCC." "And so if Israel is, is becoming dominant... it needs to figure out how to remove America from the equation." "This war has shown the limitations of American power. It's annoyed the American people. The American people do not want this war." "It's very possible that regardless of what happens in this war, America is forced to withdraw from the Middle East, in which case Israel is able to achieve its Greater Israel Project." Tucker Carlson Jiang Xueqin

Defiant Ghost

21,808 views • 3 months ago

🇮🇱🇺🇸 ISRAEL ESSENTIALLY HAS VETO OVER WHEN U.S. ENDS WAR Norwegian political scientist Glenn Diesen says Israel had role in U.S. getting into war with Iran, and they will have role in when it gets out. But only to a certain extent. “If the core national security of the United States is under threat, it is possible that the U.S. would make a decision and just tell the Israelis that they have to adjust.” Glenn Diesen
1:50

🇮🇱🇺🇸 ISRAEL ESSENTIALLY HAS VETO OVER WHEN U.S. ENDS WAR Norwegian political scientist Glenn Diesen says Israel had role in U.S. getting into war with Iran, and they will have role in when it gets out. But only to a certain extent. “If the core national security of the United States is under threat, it is possible that the U.S. would make a decision and just tell the Israelis that they have to adjust.” Glenn Diesen

Mario Nawfal

100,930 views • 3 months ago

BREAKING: 🇺🇸 Director of the U.S. National Counterterrorism Center Joe Kent has stepped down due to the war with Iran He says he cannot in good conscience support the war in Iran. “I cannot in good conscience support the ongoing war in Iran,” he said on X. “Iran posed no imminent threat to our nation, and it is clear that we started this war due to pressure from Israel and its powerful American lobby.”
1:22

BREAKING: 🇺🇸 Director of the U.S. National Counterterrorism Center Joe Kent has stepped down due to the war with Iran He says he cannot in good conscience support the war in Iran. “I cannot in good conscience support the ongoing war in Iran,” he said on X. “Iran posed no imminent threat to our nation, and it is clear that we started this war due to pressure from Israel and its powerful American lobby.”

Megatron

49,742 views • 4 months ago

🚨 THE U.S.-IRAN MEMORANDUM MAY BE A PAUSE — NOT PEACE 🚨 The memorandum of understanding between the United States and Iran is unlikely to end the conflict permanently. Because the war against Iran was never only about nuclear policy or regional security. It was about reshaping Iran itself: weakening it, fragmenting it, gaining leverage over its energy resources, and ultimately controlling the Strait of Hormuz. Had that project succeeded, Israel would have emerged with enormous military, political, and economic leverage across West Asia. Every country hesitant to join the Abraham Accords would have faced growing pressure to enter an Israeli-led regional order. That is why I see this as a high-stakes, zero-sum struggle for the Israeli Zionist establishment. A memorandum can pause open warfare, but it cannot erase Israeli strategic ambitions, intelligence operations, psychological warfare, and regional competition that produced the conflict in the first place. I do not believe Iran is naive about this either. The war has shown that Tehran plans for worst-case scenarios, and I expect Iranian officials to assume that another phase of confrontation remains possible, potentially after the U.S. midterm elections, depending on political developments in Washington. For now, the conflict may be on the shelf, but it is not over.
5:04

🚨 THE U.S.-IRAN MEMORANDUM MAY BE A PAUSE — NOT PEACE 🚨 The memorandum of understanding between the United States and Iran is unlikely to end the conflict permanently. Because the war against Iran was never only about nuclear policy or regional security. It was about reshaping Iran itself: weakening it, fragmenting it, gaining leverage over its energy resources, and ultimately controlling the Strait of Hormuz. Had that project succeeded, Israel would have emerged with enormous military, political, and economic leverage across West Asia. Every country hesitant to join the Abraham Accords would have faced growing pressure to enter an Israeli-led regional order. That is why I see this as a high-stakes, zero-sum struggle for the Israeli Zionist establishment. A memorandum can pause open warfare, but it cannot erase Israeli strategic ambitions, intelligence operations, psychological warfare, and regional competition that produced the conflict in the first place. I do not believe Iran is naive about this either. The war has shown that Tehran plans for worst-case scenarios, and I expect Iranian officials to assume that another phase of confrontation remains possible, potentially after the U.S. midterm elections, depending on political developments in Washington. For now, the conflict may be on the shelf, but it is not over.

Kevork Almassian

16,152 views • 25 days ago

🚨US-ISRAELI WAR ON IRAN: If Iran closes Strait of Hormuz, we face an ENERGY CRISIS of EPIC PROPORTIONS ‘What we worry about is a reignited Israel-Iran war, l would bring into question the role of the Strait of Hormuz, through which one third of all gas and one third of all oil used in the world goes through. So if there would be a major crisis or war between Israel and Iran, the Strait of Hormuz could be closed, and we would have an energy crisis of epic proportions. If push would come to shove, I’m sure they would do it. It would hurt them also. But if the very existence of Iranian leadership, or Iran as a state, would come into question, I’m sure they would do it. But I think that President Trump does not want to go there. So there is a backstop here, I think, in the US.’ -Tuomas Malinen, CEO of GnS Economics on Going Underground
1:58

🚨US-ISRAELI WAR ON IRAN: If Iran closes Strait of Hormuz, we face an ENERGY CRISIS of EPIC PROPORTIONS ‘What we worry about is a reignited Israel-Iran war, l would bring into question the role of the Strait of Hormuz, through which one third of all gas and one third of all oil used in the world goes through. So if there would be a major crisis or war between Israel and Iran, the Strait of Hormuz could be closed, and we would have an energy crisis of epic proportions. If push would come to shove, I’m sure they would do it. It would hurt them also. But if the very existence of Iranian leadership, or Iran as a state, would come into question, I’m sure they would do it. But I think that President Trump does not want to go there. So there is a backstop here, I think, in the US.’ -Tuomas Malinen, CEO of GnS Economics on Going Underground

Afshin Rattansi

29,747 views • 4 months ago

“Energy security, food security, and trade security” — In jeopardy if U.S.-Iran-Israel war not ended. Saudis feel that all modes of prosperity will be halted if the conflict isn’t handled. “What happens in the Gulf never stays in the Gulf,” Al-Ansari says. So, OIL is only one of the worries for U.S. and Israel. We break it down on the Sanchez Effect.
1:07

“Energy security, food security, and trade security” — In jeopardy if U.S.-Iran-Israel war not ended. Saudis feel that all modes of prosperity will be halted if the conflict isn’t handled. “What happens in the Gulf never stays in the Gulf,” Al-Ansari says. So, OIL is only one of the worries for U.S. and Israel. We break it down on the Sanchez Effect.

Rick Sanchez

15,720 views • 4 months ago

💢 Strait of Hormuz Commission — “Open for All or Closed to All” Richard Haass, former head of the Council on Foreign Relations, says Washington is not negotiating from strength and and that Iran has emerged from the war with greater leverage. 🔸On Hormuz, he suggests Washington should tell Iran that the Strait of Hormuz can be “open to all or closed to all.” ➤ Proposes an international governing commission, including Iran and Gulf states, to oversee transit though Hormuz ➤ Open to tolls and shared revenue as part of the framework 🔸Crucially, Haass says if Iran refuses, the U.S. should consider blockading Hormuz at the Gulf of Oman to stop Iranian oil exports. 🔸His view: ➤ Washington should not accept Iran’s sole control over Hormuz ➤ But also cannot realistically exclude Iran from the strait ➤ Haass says the war has made a return to the pre-war status quo impossible and U.S. has lost the war in a strategic and political sense. Separately. he calls on Trump to pressure Israel to stop what he describes as a “discretionary war” in Lebanon. “Knock it off,” he suggests Trump tell Netanyahu.
3:46

💢 Strait of Hormuz Commission — “Open for All or Closed to All” Richard Haass, former head of the Council on Foreign Relations, says Washington is not negotiating from strength and and that Iran has emerged from the war with greater leverage. 🔸On Hormuz, he suggests Washington should tell Iran that the Strait of Hormuz can be “open to all or closed to all.” ➤ Proposes an international governing commission, including Iran and Gulf states, to oversee transit though Hormuz ➤ Open to tolls and shared revenue as part of the framework 🔸Crucially, Haass says if Iran refuses, the U.S. should consider blockading Hormuz at the Gulf of Oman to stop Iranian oil exports. 🔸His view: ➤ Washington should not accept Iran’s sole control over Hormuz ➤ But also cannot realistically exclude Iran from the strait ➤ Haass says the war has made a return to the pre-war status quo impossible and U.S. has lost the war in a strategic and political sense. Separately. he calls on Trump to pressure Israel to stop what he describes as a “discretionary war” in Lebanon. “Knock it off,” he suggests Trump tell Netanyahu.

Drop Site

109,909 views • 3 months ago

INTERVIEW: The UAE was dragged into a war it never wanted, and despite being a close trading partner with Iran, it was attacked more than any other nation The outcome? Pulling out of OPEC, closer cooperation with the U.S. and Israel, and a visit by the Crown Prince to China UAE Prof Abdulkhaleq Abdulla also warned the war is not over: “There’s a 50% chance the war resumes” We discuss how a resumption of the war would look like, how the UAE is preparing for such an event, and most importantly: What the region will look like once the war ends Abdulkhaleq Abdulla - U.S. -Israel war, not UAE’s choice - Gulf’s history of wars and UAE resilience - UAE-U.S. relationship and self-defense strategy - Iran as UAE’s top security threat - Why Iran is viewed as an enemy of the UAE - Why UAE was attacked more than others - Dubai/UAE as a global hub and symbolic target - Blame for the war: Iran vs. U.S. - Was going to war the right decision? - Military results of the 40-day war - UAE defense diversification beyond the U.S. - China vs. America in UAE strategy - UAE-Iran trade relationship - UAE leaving OPEC and the “new UAE” - Risk of a second round of war with Iran
39:56

INTERVIEW: The UAE was dragged into a war it never wanted, and despite being a close trading partner with Iran, it was attacked more than any other nation The outcome? Pulling out of OPEC, closer cooperation with the U.S. and Israel, and a visit by the Crown Prince to China UAE Prof Abdulkhaleq Abdulla also warned the war is not over: “There’s a 50% chance the war resumes” We discuss how a resumption of the war would look like, how the UAE is preparing for such an event, and most importantly: What the region will look like once the war ends Abdulkhaleq Abdulla - U.S. -Israel war, not UAE’s choice - Gulf’s history of wars and UAE resilience - UAE-U.S. relationship and self-defense strategy - Iran as UAE’s top security threat - Why Iran is viewed as an enemy of the UAE - Why UAE was attacked more than others - Dubai/UAE as a global hub and symbolic target - Blame for the war: Iran vs. U.S. - Was going to war the right decision? - Military results of the 40-day war - UAE defense diversification beyond the U.S. - China vs. America in UAE strategy - UAE-Iran trade relationship - UAE leaving OPEC and the “new UAE” - Risk of a second round of war with Iran

Mario Nawfal

544,329 views • 2 months ago

"The people who are for the U.S. getting more entrenched in Israel's war with Iran—why? What is their rationale? Because it makes no sense politically. It's not a severe national security threat to the country." Tim Miller and Michael Weiss discuss the potential of war with Iran.
1:10

"The people who are for the U.S. getting more entrenched in Israel's war with Iran—why? What is their rationale? Because it makes no sense politically. It's not a severe national security threat to the country." Tim Miller and Michael Weiss discuss the potential of war with Iran.

The Bulwark

16,302 views • 4 months ago

Tucker Carlson on Iran: “The Iraq war was a catastrophe, and Trump was the first major political figure willing to say so. He’s always known it. So the question is: why would he even contemplate another war, this time with Iran? One answer is that Washington may not fully control whether such a war begins. Israel, under Benjamin Netanyahu, could decide to strike Iran on its own, without coordination. If that happened, Iran would almost certainly retaliate against Israel, and could also hit U.S. assets and energy infrastructure in the Gulf. At that point, America would be pulled in automatically. From that perspective, the U.S. may not be seeking a war with Iran at all, but instead trying to restrain the actions of its closest ally and prevent a wider conflict.”
1:16

Tucker Carlson on Iran: “The Iraq war was a catastrophe, and Trump was the first major political figure willing to say so. He’s always known it. So the question is: why would he even contemplate another war, this time with Iran? One answer is that Washington may not fully control whether such a war begins. Israel, under Benjamin Netanyahu, could decide to strike Iran on its own, without coordination. If that happened, Iran would almost certainly retaliate against Israel, and could also hit U.S. assets and energy infrastructure in the Gulf. At that point, America would be pulled in automatically. From that perspective, the U.S. may not be seeking a war with Iran at all, but instead trying to restrain the actions of its closest ally and prevent a wider conflict.”

Open Source Intel

58,984 views • 4 months ago

🚨🇺🇸🇮🇷 EX-U.S. COLONEL: HOW CLOSE THE U.S. AND IRAN ARE TO WAR Daniel Davis says the U.S. and Iran are closer to conflict than most realize. Iran’s missiles caused serious damage in the 12-day war, forcing Israel into a ceasefire. With tens of thousands of U.S. troops scattered across the region, many at vulnerable bases, Iran has warned that if war breaks out, American sites won’t be safe. Israel and the U.S. have a history of taking out key leaders. Iran knows it, and any strike would be met with backups and contingency plans. If this escalates, it could get messy, spread across the region, and be hard to control. Full Interview with Daniel Davis below
4:26

🚨🇺🇸🇮🇷 EX-U.S. COLONEL: HOW CLOSE THE U.S. AND IRAN ARE TO WAR Daniel Davis says the U.S. and Iran are closer to conflict than most realize. Iran’s missiles caused serious damage in the 12-day war, forcing Israel into a ceasefire. With tens of thousands of U.S. troops scattered across the region, many at vulnerable bases, Iran has warned that if war breaks out, American sites won’t be safe. Israel and the U.S. have a history of taking out key leaders. Iran knows it, and any strike would be met with backups and contingency plans. If this escalates, it could get messy, spread across the region, and be hard to control. Full Interview with Daniel Davis below

Mario Nawfal

59,521 views • 5 months ago

In this Liberty’s Voice clip, I push back on claims that Israel pressured the U.S. into war with Iran and explain the reality of the U.S.–Israel alliance and shared national security interests. From the 1979 hostage crisis to ongoing attacks on Americans, this is about Iran’s long history of terrorism, nuclear ambitions, ballistic missiles, and why the threat extends far beyond Israel. Topics include Trump, Iran, Israel, Middle East policy, terrorism, nuclear weapons, and U.S. foreign policy. Watch the entire episode; Rumble: YouTube:
1:04

In this Liberty’s Voice clip, I push back on claims that Israel pressured the U.S. into war with Iran and explain the reality of the U.S.–Israel alliance and shared national security interests. From the 1979 hostage crisis to ongoing attacks on Americans, this is about Iran’s long history of terrorism, nuclear ambitions, ballistic missiles, and why the threat extends far beyond Israel. Topics include Trump, Iran, Israel, Middle East policy, terrorism, nuclear weapons, and U.S. foreign policy. Watch the entire episode; Rumble: YouTube:

Mark R. Levin

41,097 views • 3 months ago

FAMILY OF DEAD U.S. SOLDIER: “We don’t need to be in this war. We created a war just because we wanted a war. It’s not right.” The lack of support for this war is so strong that the entire country is starting to see that the U.S. is an Israeli vassal state.
1:03

FAMILY OF DEAD U.S. SOLDIER: “We don’t need to be in this war. We created a war just because we wanted a war. It’s not right.” The lack of support for this war is so strong that the entire country is starting to see that the U.S. is an Israeli vassal state.

Stew Peters

224,904 views • 4 months ago

Are U.S. and Israeli goals in Iran diverging? “For Israel, Iran is a regional adversary… and they want Iran to collapse… But Iran’s collapse is not in America’s interest. We did have an interest in Iran not developing a nuclear weapon, but we could have achieved that diplomatically… So I think that there is a divergence of interest between Israel and the U.S.” The American Conservative senior editor Andrew Day argues the United States’ and Israel’s interests in Iran are diverging, as Israel seeks regime collapse while the U.S. prefers stability and cooperation. Watch The Matt Gaetz Show on YouTube TV Today!
2:09

Are U.S. and Israeli goals in Iran diverging? “For Israel, Iran is a regional adversary… and they want Iran to collapse… But Iran’s collapse is not in America’s interest. We did have an interest in Iran not developing a nuclear weapon, but we could have achieved that diplomatically… So I think that there is a divergence of interest between Israel and the U.S.” The American Conservative senior editor Andrew Day argues the United States’ and Israel’s interests in Iran are diverging, as Israel seeks regime collapse while the U.S. prefers stability and cooperation. Watch The Matt Gaetz Show on YouTube TV Today!

One America News

22,300 views • 4 months ago

BREAKING: Director of the U.S. National Counterterrorism Center Joe Kent has stepped down, says he cannot in good conscience support the war in Iran. “I cannot in good conscience support the ongoing war in Iran,” he said on X. “Iran posed no imminent threat to our nation, and it is clear that we started this war due to pressure from Israel and its powerful American lobby.”
1:22

BREAKING: Director of the U.S. National Counterterrorism Center Joe Kent has stepped down, says he cannot in good conscience support the war in Iran. “I cannot in good conscience support the ongoing war in Iran,” he said on X. “Iran posed no imminent threat to our nation, and it is clear that we started this war due to pressure from Israel and its powerful American lobby.”

Collin Rugg

292,805 views • 4 months ago

We all know that Israel attacked the military base in the UK and blamed on on Iran. Now we are watching the media promote this false flag attack in an attempt to escalate the war. The media is complicit and they should be charged with the war crimes that are being committed by the U.S. military in Iran.
3:43

We all know that Israel attacked the military base in the UK and blamed on on Iran. Now we are watching the media promote this false flag attack in an attempt to escalate the war. The media is complicit and they should be charged with the war crimes that are being committed by the U.S. military in Iran.

RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

49,568 views • 3 months ago