Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

It bothers me, more than it should probably, that social media platforms will come down on excessive diet culture content as "pro Ana" But then allow muckbangs and "what I eat in a day as a fat person who doesn't diet" content. It's just another way that they want...

20,225 views • 6 days ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Investigative science journalist Nina Teicholz: "There's a large body of rigorous research... showing that a diet higher in fat and lower in carbohydrates leads to better outcomes in terms of diabetes, obesity, heart disease." "When you eat [carbohydrates], they're converted in your blood into glucose. Glucose is a simple sugar... and it's like a quick fuel, and your body uses that up, and then when it's gone, you want another hit." "But if you become what's called a fat burner... your primary fuel is not glucose, it's fat—with the fat that you store in your body, and also the fat that you eat." "You can have two fuel sources as a human being. You can either live on glucose or fat. If you've got a healthy metabolism, you can switch back and forth between them." "People who... have just been living on carbs for a really long time, mainly glucose—they can only get their fuel from glucose... They can't switch over to fat to burn their own fat." "Imagine I were a 300-pound woman. All that fat on me? That is fuel... That's like having granola bars strapped all over my body, right? I should be able to access that fuel... and I can't access it because my body doesn't know how to burn my fat." "And that's what happens when you live too long living off of glucose as your only fuel source. You cannot switch over and burn your own fat." "It's like living on top of a well and not having a bucket to get yourself a drink of water, and then you die of thirst." Credit: Nina Teicholz, PhD Joe Rogan

Wide Awake Media

33,490 views • 1 year ago

Diet soda makes you fat because it has chemicals that your body doesn’t know how to ‘process’? 🤣 Actually diet soda sweetened with say aspartame is processed into aspartate and phenylalanine (2 amino acids found in every source of protein & in way higher amounts) and methanol 😱. Before yall get your panties in a twist, the amount of methanol produced by diet sodas relative to what would cause issues would mean you’d need to drink approx 20,000 12 oz cans of Diet Coke to cause problems. And no, methanol does not accumulate in the body & it is metabolized by the liver & excreted by the kidneys. You’d die of fluid toxicity before you’d ever even come close to the level of methanol needed to cause any issues from drinking diet soda 🤷🏼‍♂️ So yea, our body knows what to do with it. But her claim doesn’t even make sense. If the body didn’t know what to do with it, how would it get stored as fat? And WHAT would get stored as fat? Which ‘chemicals’ and HOW EXACTLY THROUGH WHAT MECHANISM? 🤣 Maybe she’d say they cause insulin release which makes you fat… only one problem with that… they conclusively DO NOT increase insulin (PMID: 36839408) And diet drinks do NOT make you fat. In fact, in the HUMAN. RANDOMIZED. CONTROLLED. TRIALS where they have people drink diet drinks in place of regular sugar sweetened beverages, people lose weight, & in several studies they actually lose more weight than people who substituted water 🤷🏼‍♂️ (PMIDs: 37794246, 37475684, 26708700, & 35285920) I’m not saying you should drink diet soda in place of water. What I’m saying is for many people, diet drinks help them stop drinking regular soda, which in turn helps them lose weight, & get healthier If we fear monger this useful tool, it confuses people & the unintended consequence is many people takeaway not that they will drink more water, but they should not drink diet soda so they might as well continue drinking regular soda since diet soda is portrayed as just as bad by these influencers Also no one tell this gal water has dihydrogen monoxide 🤣. I don’t know her name… y’all tag her 🤷🏼‍♂️ DATA>feelings

Layne Norton, PhD

243,462 views • 2 years ago

I hear so often from the Dommes I work with that they struggle with people online fetichizing them and simply seeing them for how sexy and beautiful they are. They project their fantasies and their desires onto you. That stops immediately once you move the attention from you to them. From 'look at me' to 'I see you'. What does that look like? When you create content, think of them and what this scene or that narrative is evoking. What will they learn from you? What they want is not to passively watch how sexy you are, but for you to train them, to give them instructions, to teach them, to guide them, to be in charge, to command them. This is not being an object but the main subject. The Authority figure. How is your content already doing that. The sexy photos can still be there, they are important to already capture des attention. But what you do with that attention once you have it, is where the power dynamic is established. Positioning yourself as more than a stunning Goddess, but actually a woman who has a voice, opinions, perspective, a philosophy, a way to doing things, teaching them what you like, how you like it, why you like it, already makes them want to be that for you. You hold the attention, you hold the power, so you direct it. And for that, you want them to know you get them and you know what lives within them... that creates the desire for you to be the one exposing it. You instantly build trust. Not because you demanded it, but because you earned it: you showed them you know what you are doing. You have experience, you understand them. They are not told to come see you, they are seduced into it. They desire it. And they will work for it. This will attract better clients (real subs) and instead of you trying to get their attention, they will work to earn yours. If you want to learn more about power dynamics, building a brand as a Pro or the psychology behind BDSM, you can now access all my trainings and classes in one place for a fraction of the cost of The Dominatrix Academy. And you can reinvest the total amount towards the Program. Message me [SECRET] for the details. This offer is not available on my website.

Ms. Malissia

15,768 views • 3 months ago

Trump, visibly moved by the defense of the troops, stepped back in to close the loop and he didn’t hold back. Referring to NBC and their network’s coverage, he called them “real scum.” But what seemed to bother him more wasn’t the media’s treatment of him, it was what he saw as disrespect to the brave American men and women who carried out the mission. “The report said what it said, and it was fine. It was severe, they think, but they had no idea,” Trump said. “They shouldn’t have issued a report until they did. But we’ve gotten the information. And I think Pete said it better than you can say it.” Turning directly to O’Donnell, he continued, “You should be proud. You, especially you, should be proud of those pilots. And you shouldn’t be trying to demean them.” “These pilots flew at great risk,” he said, his voice steady. “There was a big chance they’d never come home to see their husbands or wives.” Then he let the media have it with both barrels. “Let me just tell you—you and NBC fake news, which is one of the worst, and CNN, New York Times—they’re all bad. They’re sick. There’s something wrong with them.” He said he received a call from Missouri, from those directly involved in the mission, describing how devastated they were to see their sacrifice minimized in the media. “They put their lives on the line and then they have real scum come out and write reports that are as negative as they could possibly be.” “It should be the opposite,” Trump said. “You should make them heroes and heroines. It’s a shame.” American strength was on exhibit in The Hague, and everyone, including the media, was now officially on notice.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

149,252 views • 1 year ago

traditional marketing is dying and Obsession (the 2026 movie) is one of the biggest examples of it the movie has made $225 million in 2 weeks of launching and it only costed $750,000 to make thats a 300x return on production budget while a Star Wars movie came out a week after and it costed $166,000,000, more than 220x than obsession and it's struggling to make a 1x return on production budget the difference between these 2 movies is that obsession was incredibly clippable the clips of that movie are literally trending TikTok audios people clipped obsession and made it go viral all over social media they didn't need a $50 million marketing budget or interviews, or a press release just teenagers on their phone with capcut and tiktok made this movie $225 million in 2 weeks that's what happens when you're culturally relevant people's social media feeds are the culture when you run an ad or pay for a partnership it's not a part of the culture, it's an interruption and people despise that when you do clipping for your brand, product, or movie, it blends into the feed it's one with the culture people move with the culture, they share it, they react to it, and they build trends around it the reason people are rushing to go and watch Obsession is because they keep seeing it on their fyp 20 times a day it naturally builds curiosity and fomo and they don't want to miss out clipping blends you into the culture and when you become one with the trends that's when your costs will literally go down 300x and your ROI will go up 1000x this is what we see on Content Rewards every single day with our campaigns where our CPMs get as low as $0.30 to even $0.09 and we see numbers like 400 million views w/ only $100,000 in spend if you also want to see results like that, DM me and I'll help you

Alex

11,671 views • 1 month ago