Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

It is preposterous for Starmer to claim he did not know Mandelson failed security vetting. If the Prime Minister doesn’t know what’s happening in his own office, he shouldn’t be in charge of our country. He should go.

211,494 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

🚨SKY NEWS PUTS STARMER ON THE SPOT AND CALLS OUT HIS BS: “WE DON’T BELIEVE YOU ON MANDELSON VETTING SCANDAL!” 🤯 Starmer’s Furious Act Over Mandelson Vetting Scandal Falls Flat 🤨 Sky News put Keir Starmer firmly on the spot over the Peter Mandelson ambassador scandal. Prime Minister once again doing his best “I’m innocent and I’m FURIOUS” impression over the Mandelson scandal. Yeah course you are Keir, we believe you 🙃 The man is out here claiming it’s “unforgivable” and “staggering” that he wasn’t told Mandelson failed security vetting. Oh please. Does he really believe he’s convincing ANYONE that he didn’t know? He’s delusional! Of course he f*cking knew! Sky News basically said it to his face: “Are you really expecting us to believe that a senior civil servant, off his own back, without any sort of direction about the importance of Peter Mandelson being Ambassador, unilaterally overruled security vetting to approve a political appointment?” Starmer’s nervous robot response? Just repeated the same line like a broken record: “I was not told that he had failed security vetting. No minister or No 10 was told…” The reporter put it to him that he’s been prime minister for 2 years now and it sounds like he doesn’t have a grip on his government, but the robot just kept glitching, repeating the exact same talking points. He knows he’s lying, we know he’s lying, and he knows we know he’s lying. 🤥

J Stewart

152,016 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад