Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

It is preposterous for Starmer to claim he did not know Mandelson failed security vetting. If the Prime Minister doesn’t know what’s happening in his own office, he shouldn’t be in charge of our country. He should go.

KemiBadenoch's profile picture

Kemi Badenoch

405,984 subscribers

211,549 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & PolitikBildung
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer under fire after ambassador pick Peter Mandelson reportedly FAILED security vetting, but was pushed through anyway. Parliament was told “due process was followed.” Now Starmer claims he “wasn’t told.” So which is it? Either he knew and misled Parliament… or he didn’t know and lost control of his own government.
3:24

UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer under fire after ambassador pick Peter Mandelson reportedly FAILED security vetting, but was pushed through anyway. Parliament was told “due process was followed.” Now Starmer claims he “wasn’t told.” So which is it? Either he knew and misled Parliament… or he didn’t know and lost control of his own government.

Tousi TV

15,357 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

This MUST be the end….Keir Starmer, in fact the whole government should not be able to survive this. Not content with blatantly lying when they claimed they did not know the extent of Mandelsons relationship with Epstein, it now turns out that he FAILED the security vetting. The government claim that Starmer and in fact NO ministers were aware that he failed the vetting and that some mysterious “officials” in the foreign office overruled the failed vetting and passed him anyway. How believeable is that….not even slightly. Would some civil servant or lowly MP sign off on the most important diplomatic appointment in the country without even consulting their political bosses….and if they did it means our so called elected representatives are not in charge and not running the country. Either way they MUST GO. Either Starmer or the foreign secretary at the time of both must resign tomorrow.
5:44

This MUST be the end….Keir Starmer, in fact the whole government should not be able to survive this. Not content with blatantly lying when they claimed they did not know the extent of Mandelsons relationship with Epstein, it now turns out that he FAILED the security vetting. The government claim that Starmer and in fact NO ministers were aware that he failed the vetting and that some mysterious “officials” in the foreign office overruled the failed vetting and passed him anyway. How believeable is that….not even slightly. Would some civil servant or lowly MP sign off on the most important diplomatic appointment in the country without even consulting their political bosses….and if they did it means our so called elected representatives are not in charge and not running the country. Either way they MUST GO. Either Starmer or the foreign secretary at the time of both must resign tomorrow.

John Hannam

22,783 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

"This is a scandal on a whole new level!" "If the Prime Minister didn't know that Mandelson failed vetting - then he is guilty of SUPREME INCOMPOTENCE!" Kevin O'Sullivan
2:32

"This is a scandal on a whole new level!" "If the Prime Minister didn't know that Mandelson failed vetting - then he is guilty of SUPREME INCOMPOTENCE!" Kevin O'Sullivan

Talk

24,810 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

UK's PM Starmer is 'absolutely furious', claiming no one told him that Epstein's friend Mandelson failed security vetting In 2025 The Independent wrote that Starmer appointed Mandelson, though he failed MI6 vetting
0:25

UK's PM Starmer is 'absolutely furious', claiming no one told him that Epstein's friend Mandelson failed security vetting In 2025 The Independent wrote that Starmer appointed Mandelson, though he failed MI6 vetting

RT

24,979 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

🚨BREAKING: Keir Starmer breaks silence on the Peter Mandelson vetting row, saying he is 'absolutely furious' and insisting neither he nor any minister was told Mandelson had failed security vetting, calling it 'unforgivable'. More to follow on GB News...
0:39

🚨BREAKING: Keir Starmer breaks silence on the Peter Mandelson vetting row, saying he is 'absolutely furious' and insisting neither he nor any minister was told Mandelson had failed security vetting, calling it 'unforgivable'. More to follow on GB News...

GB News

92,088 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

🇬🇧🇺🇸 "That I wasn't told that Peter Mandelson had failed security vetting when he was appointed is staggering. Not only was I not told, no minister was told. And I'm absolutely furious about that." — UK's Prime Minister, Keir Starmer expresses outrage with Mandelson & says he didn't know about Mandelson's past ties with Epstein
0:42

🇬🇧🇺🇸 "That I wasn't told that Peter Mandelson had failed security vetting when he was appointed is staggering. Not only was I not told, no minister was told. And I'm absolutely furious about that." — UK's Prime Minister, Keir Starmer expresses outrage with Mandelson & says he didn't know about Mandelson's past ties with Epstein

Lord Bebo

21,113 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

"That I wasn't told that Peter Mandelson had failed security vetting when he was appointed is staggering," UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer says Follow live:
0:34

"That I wasn't told that Peter Mandelson had failed security vetting when he was appointed is staggering," UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer says Follow live:

BBC Breaking News

1,039,021 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Opposition leaders are calling on Sir Keir Starmer to resign as Prime Minister, after it was revealed Lord Mandelson failed security vetting before he became Ambassador to the US. The Prime Minister repeatedly told MPs and reporters that the process had been followed - before it became clear last night that officials actually overruled that process to appoint Mandelson. We ask Chief Secretary to the Prime Minister, Darren Jones when he knew that Mandelson had failed the vetting.
0:58

Opposition leaders are calling on Sir Keir Starmer to resign as Prime Minister, after it was revealed Lord Mandelson failed security vetting before he became Ambassador to the US. The Prime Minister repeatedly told MPs and reporters that the process had been followed - before it became clear last night that officials actually overruled that process to appoint Mandelson. We ask Chief Secretary to the Prime Minister, Darren Jones when he knew that Mandelson had failed the vetting.

Good Morning Britain

15,372 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

🚨SKY NEWS PUTS STARMER ON THE SPOT AND CALLS OUT HIS BS: “WE DON’T BELIEVE YOU ON MANDELSON VETTING SCANDAL!” 🤯 Starmer’s Furious Act Over Mandelson Vetting Scandal Falls Flat 🤨 Sky News put Keir Starmer firmly on the spot over the Peter Mandelson ambassador scandal. Prime Minister once again doing his best “I’m innocent and I’m FURIOUS” impression over the Mandelson scandal. Yeah course you are Keir, we believe you 🙃 The man is out here claiming it’s “unforgivable” and “staggering” that he wasn’t told Mandelson failed security vetting. Oh please. Does he really believe he’s convincing ANYONE that he didn’t know? He’s delusional! Of course he f*cking knew! Sky News basically said it to his face: “Are you really expecting us to believe that a senior civil servant, off his own back, without any sort of direction about the importance of Peter Mandelson being Ambassador, unilaterally overruled security vetting to approve a political appointment?” Starmer’s nervous robot response? Just repeated the same line like a broken record: “I was not told that he had failed security vetting. No minister or No 10 was told…” The reporter put it to him that he’s been prime minister for 2 years now and it sounds like he doesn’t have a grip on his government, but the robot just kept glitching, repeating the exact same talking points. He knows he’s lying, we know he’s lying, and he knows we know he’s lying. 🤥
1:43

🚨SKY NEWS PUTS STARMER ON THE SPOT AND CALLS OUT HIS BS: “WE DON’T BELIEVE YOU ON MANDELSON VETTING SCANDAL!” 🤯 Starmer’s Furious Act Over Mandelson Vetting Scandal Falls Flat 🤨 Sky News put Keir Starmer firmly on the spot over the Peter Mandelson ambassador scandal. Prime Minister once again doing his best “I’m innocent and I’m FURIOUS” impression over the Mandelson scandal. Yeah course you are Keir, we believe you 🙃 The man is out here claiming it’s “unforgivable” and “staggering” that he wasn’t told Mandelson failed security vetting. Oh please. Does he really believe he’s convincing ANYONE that he didn’t know? He’s delusional! Of course he f*cking knew! Sky News basically said it to his face: “Are you really expecting us to believe that a senior civil servant, off his own back, without any sort of direction about the importance of Peter Mandelson being Ambassador, unilaterally overruled security vetting to approve a political appointment?” Starmer’s nervous robot response? Just repeated the same line like a broken record: “I was not told that he had failed security vetting. No minister or No 10 was told…” The reporter put it to him that he’s been prime minister for 2 years now and it sounds like he doesn’t have a grip on his government, but the robot just kept glitching, repeating the exact same talking points. He knows he’s lying, we know he’s lying, and he knows we know he’s lying. 🤥

J Stewart

152,161 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer insists that he should have been informed that Peter Mandelson failed vetting checks carried out UK Security Vetting (UKSV) 📺 Sky 501, Virgin 602, Freeview 233 and YouTube
1:56

Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer insists that he should have been informed that Peter Mandelson failed vetting checks carried out UK Security Vetting (UKSV) 📺 Sky 501, Virgin 602, Freeview 233 and YouTube

Sky News

29,371 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Great point. Starmer claims he didn’t know Mandy failed the vetting, yet the Foreign Office overruled it for Mandelson. So will he now throw Foreign Secretary David Lammy under the bus? One of them has to go… preferably both. #StarmerOut #Mandelson #Lammy #ReformUK #BritainFirst Kevin O'Sullivan Talk Rafe Heydel-Mankoo
4:28

Great point. Starmer claims he didn’t know Mandy failed the vetting, yet the Foreign Office overruled it for Mandelson. So will he now throw Foreign Secretary David Lammy under the bus? One of them has to go… preferably both. #StarmerOut #Mandelson #Lammy #ReformUK #BritainFirst Kevin O'Sullivan Talk Rafe Heydel-Mankoo

🇬🇧UKJ0N🇬🇧

32,571 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Sky's Political Editor Beth Rigby understands that Sir Keir Starmer will go to the House of Commons on Monday to correct the record about the vetting of Peter Mandelson for the US ambassador role. Downing Street has said in a statement that the prime minister was not aware that Peter Mandelson failed his security vetting.
3:21

Sky's Political Editor Beth Rigby understands that Sir Keir Starmer will go to the House of Commons on Monday to correct the record about the vetting of Peter Mandelson for the US ambassador role. Downing Street has said in a statement that the prime minister was not aware that Peter Mandelson failed his security vetting.

Sky News

177,309 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

"Did the prime minister ask the question himself ever?" Victoria Derbyshire asks Cabinet Office Minister Nick Thomas-Symonds if Sir Keir Starmer questioned whether Peter Mandelson had failed security vetting before being made US ambassador. #Newsnight
1:11

"Did the prime minister ask the question himself ever?" Victoria Derbyshire asks Cabinet Office Minister Nick Thomas-Symonds if Sir Keir Starmer questioned whether Peter Mandelson had failed security vetting before being made US ambassador. #Newsnight

BBC Newsnight

16,948 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Starmer claimed that he didn’t know the true relationship of Mandelson & Epstein, but The Times had published several pages on it in 2025... He claims he didn’t know that Mandelson failed vetting, yet The Independent had it on their front page last year…and it was disclosed in Parliament ⬇️ HE’S A GONER
0:20

Starmer claimed that he didn’t know the true relationship of Mandelson & Epstein, but The Times had published several pages on it in 2025... He claims he didn’t know that Mandelson failed vetting, yet The Independent had it on their front page last year…and it was disclosed in Parliament ⬇️ HE’S A GONER

Adam Brooks AKA EssexPR 🇬🇧

29,652 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

'It seems inconceivable to me that Keir Starmer did not know.' Political Editor of The Independent David Maddox explains how he reported months ago on Peter Mandelson failing his security vetting. 🇬🇧 Become a Friend of GB News:
2:12

'It seems inconceivable to me that Keir Starmer did not know.' Political Editor of The Independent David Maddox explains how he reported months ago on Peter Mandelson failing his security vetting. 🇬🇧 Become a Friend of GB News:

GB News

19,413 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

'Why do you always sound like the passenger in this government not the driver?' 'I was not told!' Keir Starmer insists neither he nor any minister was informed that Peter Mandelson had failed his security vetting.
1:09

'Why do you always sound like the passenger in this government not the driver?' 'I was not told!' Keir Starmer insists neither he nor any minister was informed that Peter Mandelson had failed his security vetting.

GB News

37,190 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

In February, Keir Starmer said "There was then I should add, security vetting carried out independently by the security services, which is an intensive exercise that gave him clearance for the role, and you have to go through that before you take up the post." Today, he's saying that he didn't know that Peter Mandelson failed it.
0:34

In February, Keir Starmer said "There was then I should add, security vetting carried out independently by the security services, which is an intensive exercise that gave him clearance for the role, and you have to go through that before you take up the post." Today, he's saying that he didn't know that Peter Mandelson failed it.

Mukhtar

10,733 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

IMPORTANT: PMQs Wed 4 Feb Starmer asked 'did the security vetting he received mention Mandelson's relationship with Epstein' Starmer answers: 'yes it did' So Starmer had seen the DV vetting So how can he have been unaware that Mandelson had failed that DV? #receipts
1:00

IMPORTANT: PMQs Wed 4 Feb Starmer asked 'did the security vetting he received mention Mandelson's relationship with Epstein' Starmer answers: 'yes it did' So Starmer had seen the DV vetting So how can he have been unaware that Mandelson had failed that DV? #receipts

Ross Kempsell

361,293 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

The Foreign Office's top civil servant is leaving his post after his department did not inform the Prime Minister that Lord Mandelson had failed security vetting for the role of US ambassador. But as political correspondent Harry Farley told #BBCBreakfast there are calls for Keir Starmer to resign
1:10

The Foreign Office's top civil servant is leaving his post after his department did not inform the Prime Minister that Lord Mandelson had failed security vetting for the role of US ambassador. But as political correspondent Harry Farley told #BBCBreakfast there are calls for Keir Starmer to resign

BBC Breakfast

27,939 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten