Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

It seems Amaany doesn’t fully understand how pensions work. Mohamed Nasheed didn’t introduce 5,000 MVR old age benefit as a permanent allowance for all Maldivians. Before his time, there was no contributory retirement pension system. So, he introduced one (7% employee, 7% employer), along with the 5,000 MVR benefit...

55,531 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 11

Фото профиля ޅަރީތި ތުއްތު
ޅަރީތި ތުއްތު1 год назад

@MohamedNasheed Not only the pension, but I think she doesn't understand anything about social security and the ontology of social phenomenon. It's a pity that Muizzu appoints people who don't understand the science of social security and society. We are truly going backward!

Фото профиля A.A.R
A.A.R1 год назад

Her actual name is not Amaani. It's her nickname. She is an idiot just like @shiuna_m and @malshasharyf in PNC. She thinks she is something cos bofan Abdulla thinks she is his something. She has been talking bushit from the first day and nobody under the sun knows why she is given a political job in a big government office. When there are thousands of qualified people looking for jobs, muizz is so desperate that he stooped so low giving unnecessary jobs to idiots. No child will lose anything by giving pensions to anyone. And no husband and wife must feel the burden to look after their parents when they grow old. Old people has to be given a respect for serving the country when they were young. And there is no harm given them a fund or money till they die.

Фото профиля kalhaa beyya
kalhaa beyya1 год назад

@MohamedNasheed Mihen ve kiyavaagen thibey meehun magaamu thakah laan jeheynii 🥲

Фото профиля raNNaMaRiAn
raNNaMaRiAn1 год назад

@MohamedNasheed Mi sarukaaru ga ebahuri tha hamajehey ekaku ves ? Hurinama emeehaku ulhey nee vahkan kurumuga .. gamaarun ulheyny @MMuizzu vefa dhifaa u kurumiga

Фото профиля concerned citizen
concerned citizen1 год назад

@MohamedNasheed Saanavee thauleem mi aalaathunnah dheynvee

Фото профиля Mammoth Nation
Mammoth Nation1 год назад

We can't believe they released this video of Kamala Harris.

Фото профиля Ahmed Nashid
Ahmed Nashid1 год назад

@MohamedNasheed Manjey bunan rangalhu vaahakaeh, kale ah hahgu nuvaa magaamehga indhegen mi rahjjeyga aadhaige rayyithumeehaa ulhey haalaeh nengeyne. Assluves kaley menge fikuruge meehunakee rayyithunah alhaalaa balaa baehnun. Balany vahkkan kurevey thw. MDP ge 2 verikamah ves saabas 💛

Фото профиля Ali Buhaaree
Ali Buhaaree1 год назад

@MohamedNasheed PNC bot eh v meema thahkolheh gamaaru vaaneh. For example @malshasharyf or @shiuna_m

Фото профиля Black Coral
Black Coral1 год назад

@MohamedNasheed Muizzu sarukaaru hingaagoi Meegen randi eh lan vaa dhe dhuhu tweet kofa policy aka hadhany . Komme kamme ehen koffa hunaanee . Allowance tha viyas . Flat feyrun viyas, mihaaru goathi scheme baathil kuran vegen Zuvaan jeelu kiyaa account akun kuruvany .

Фото профиля hassan
hassan1 год назад

@MohamedNasheed when did pension project started? when did mohamed nasheed became president? MIRA bill and Pension bill was drafted and even translated to Dhivehi when he became president where is name of @maumoonagayoom ? i was was working in MoF PublicAccounts component of Pension project

Фото профиля Yellow Bus
Yellow Bus1 год назад

@MohamedNasheed another stupid cunt emerged , added to collection among Malsha and Shiuna

Похожие видео

People are drowning in debt “Australia’s retirement system has been based on the presumption that the overwhelming majority of people would own their homes outright upon retirement. However, due to declining homeownership rates, Australians buying homes later, and carrying larger mortgages into retirement, that assumption is clearly crumbling. Westpac notes that people over the age of 40 accounted for around 20% of mortgage loans issued to first-home buyers in 2025. As a result of people purchasing later and taking out larger mortgages, Loan Market Group has found that 40% of respondents do not expect to have paid off their mortgages by the time they retire. This analysis aligns with warnings from the Super Members Council of Australia, which estimated that more than 40% of Australians will retire with mortgage debt, up from 16% two decades ago.” ••••••••••••••••••••••••• People First has been the only party talking about the fact that 40% of people who retiree haven’t paid off their mortgage. This figure is based from ABS numbers now five years old so the figures are probably worse. These people end up cashing out their super and going on the pension this wasting billions on Superannuation fees for nothing. No other party wants to tackle our financial system except People First. We will: • Reintroduce capital controls to stop house inflation • Bring back a public bank • Start an Infrastructure Bank • Bring back a Government Insurance Office • Allow young people to keep their superannuation so they can buy a house • Cut immigration It’s time to put the Australian People First.

Gerard Rennick

13,494 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

This conversation has generated a fair bit of conversation so I think it’s worth elaborating on. There is a common misconception that superannuation is decreasing the number of retirees on the pension. As per ASFA figures attached in comments - the median balance for men and women aged 60-64 is $220k and $164k respectively. That is nowhere near enough to get off the full pension which starts to reduce when a home owning single person has assets of $321k. The pension cuts out entirely if a home owning single person has assets of $714k. In other words, well over half of people about to retire have barely half the level of assets needed to get off the full pension. This is worse than when Superannuation began in 1992 when 77% of retirees were receiving a pension. 50% were receiving a full pension and 27% were receiving a part pension. Furthermore as per the ABS figures attached in comments below, 40% of people now retiree with a mortgage up from 10% in 1992. These figures are over five years old so the figure is probably worse. That means that most people have to cash in their super when they retire to pay off their mortgage and then go onto the pension anyway. Then there is the whole return on investment scenario - if house prices are growing the same as or faster than superannuation returns, then yet again it becomes a false economy. In other words Superannuation is not achieving its stated aim. The Productivity Commission estimates the cost of running Superannuation is around 1% of funds under management or $40 billion per year. Australia doesn’t need more financial engineers in this country, we need real engineers building real assets not paper assets. Nor should we be investing superannuation money overseas in foreign infrastructure when our own country desperately needs more infrastructure investment.

Gerard Rennick

44,183 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад