正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

It was the Russians what did it….what a total shock…that’s convenient. BUT and it’s a big but, nobody needs to know why or how. The first real day or the Ukranian men’s Keir Starmer trial. We found out from the prosecution that the men were alleged to have been...

JohnHann04's profile picture

John Hannam

28,008 subscribers

19,674 次观看 • 5 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Old Bailey, 10:30am, the trial of the 3 Ukranian young men who allegedly committed arson against Keir Starmers home and vehicle starts. But you probably wouldn’t know if you were listening to the radio or tv news. Why? Why has it been so silent on what after all, should be a massive story. Why did they do it? What was their motive? How did they know how to locate a home and a car associated with the Prime Minister? We support Ukraine so what provoked their anger? And will the gallery genuinely be open for people to report. Will they be “persuaded” to plead guilty which prevents a trial taking place. So many questions….and the mainstream press are asking none of them🤷‍♂️
4:58

Old Bailey, 10:30am, the trial of the 3 Ukranian young men who allegedly committed arson against Keir Starmers home and vehicle starts. But you probably wouldn’t know if you were listening to the radio or tv news. Why? Why has it been so silent on what after all, should be a massive story. Why did they do it? What was their motive? How did they know how to locate a home and a car associated with the Prime Minister? We support Ukraine so what provoked their anger? And will the gallery genuinely be open for people to report. Will they be “persuaded” to plead guilty which prevents a trial taking place. So many questions….and the mainstream press are asking none of them🤷‍♂️

John Hannam

100,370 次观看 • 5 个月前

NBC News’ Kristen Welker: “The Danish foreign minister says there hasn’t been a Chinese warship in Greenland for a decade. What evidence do you have that this is a pressing threat?” Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent: “We have asymmetric information. And again, President Trump is being strategic here. What evidence was there that the Russians were going into Crimea? Well, actually there was a lot of evidence that the Russians were going to go into Ukraine. And Joe Biden said, ‘Well, just take a little bit of it.’” “But what we know is that the U.S., that Greenland can only be defended it if is part of the U.S. And it will not need to be defended if it is part of the U.S. The president is trying to avoid a conflict.”
0:56

NBC News’ Kristen Welker: “The Danish foreign minister says there hasn’t been a Chinese warship in Greenland for a decade. What evidence do you have that this is a pressing threat?” Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent: “We have asymmetric information. And again, President Trump is being strategic here. What evidence was there that the Russians were going into Crimea? Well, actually there was a lot of evidence that the Russians were going to go into Ukraine. And Joe Biden said, ‘Well, just take a little bit of it.’” “But what we know is that the U.S., that Greenland can only be defended it if is part of the U.S. And it will not need to be defended if it is part of the U.S. The president is trying to avoid a conflict.”

RedWave Press

976,306 次观看 • 8 个月前

MUST WATCH 🚨: NBC News’ Kristen Welker: “The Danish foreign minister says there hasn’t been a Chinese warship in Greenland for a decade. What evidence do you have that this is a pressing threat?” Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent: “We have asymmetric information. And again, President Trump is being strategic here. What evidence was there that the Russians were going into Crimea? Well, actually there was a lot of evidence that the Russians were going to go into Ukraine. And Joe Biden said, ‘Well, just take a little bit of it.’” “But what we know is that the U.S., that Greenland can only be defended it if is part of the U.S. And it will not need to be defended if it is part of the U.S. The president is trying to avoid a conflict.”
0:56

MUST WATCH 🚨: NBC News’ Kristen Welker: “The Danish foreign minister says there hasn’t been a Chinese warship in Greenland for a decade. What evidence do you have that this is a pressing threat?” Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent: “We have asymmetric information. And again, President Trump is being strategic here. What evidence was there that the Russians were going into Crimea? Well, actually there was a lot of evidence that the Russians were going to go into Ukraine. And Joe Biden said, ‘Well, just take a little bit of it.’” “But what we know is that the U.S., that Greenland can only be defended it if is part of the U.S. And it will not need to be defended if it is part of the U.S. The president is trying to avoid a conflict.”

Dr Charlie Ward

277,707 次观看 • 1 个月前

This is why Charlie Kirk was so effective with the younger generation. He was authentic. Today you have a bunch of demons, walking around peddling some perverse version of Christianity that has absolutely nothing to do with Christ or the Bible or any of the incredible happy, joyous things that the gospel’s teach us. All you have is conspiracy and hatred and poisonous fruit. That is not going to end well for the people who consume it because they will be very confused about what it actually means to be a Christian.
0:46

This is why Charlie Kirk was so effective with the younger generation. He was authentic. Today you have a bunch of demons, walking around peddling some perverse version of Christianity that has absolutely nothing to do with Christ or the Bible or any of the incredible happy, joyous things that the gospel’s teach us. All you have is conspiracy and hatred and poisonous fruit. That is not going to end well for the people who consume it because they will be very confused about what it actually means to be a Christian.

Insurrection Barbie

20,983 次观看 • 2 个月前

“Why does Prime Minister Keir Starmer appear to be so hesitant to go against the wishes of sexual predators? Why did he appear to be so hesitant to prosecute Britain's most notorious pedophile, Sir Jimmy Savile? Why did he appear to be so hesitant to prosecute the key 'grooming' gang underage rape scandal in Rotherham? Why did he appear to be so hesitant to say 'no' to Lord Mandelson, a key Epstein friend who was leaking private government information to Epstein? What is it with Keir Starmer and cases involving sexual predation and sexual exploitation and underage rape? Why does he appear impotent to do anything about them? We've seen a pattern developing and that pattern to our logical minds can only be explained by the fact that it could well be highly likely that they've got something on Keir Starmer too. This man needs to resign. That is the only option. He must go. He must. And by the way, that doesn't mean there'll be a general election because it may well be the Labour gets rid of him and brings in another one of their own. But nevertheless, that means Labour goes into the May elections under a new leader, and that means the issue is kept alive because the public, we are sure, will be rightfully outraged at these revelations, and will demand that all of the Labour leadership is held to account for these shenanigans. So the fact that Keir Starmer is still in position is unsustainable. It can no longer be tolerated.” Maajid Nawaz for WARRIOR CREED
1:39

“Why does Prime Minister Keir Starmer appear to be so hesitant to go against the wishes of sexual predators? Why did he appear to be so hesitant to prosecute Britain's most notorious pedophile, Sir Jimmy Savile? Why did he appear to be so hesitant to prosecute the key 'grooming' gang underage rape scandal in Rotherham? Why did he appear to be so hesitant to say 'no' to Lord Mandelson, a key Epstein friend who was leaking private government information to Epstein? What is it with Keir Starmer and cases involving sexual predation and sexual exploitation and underage rape? Why does he appear impotent to do anything about them? We've seen a pattern developing and that pattern to our logical minds can only be explained by the fact that it could well be highly likely that they've got something on Keir Starmer too. This man needs to resign. That is the only option. He must go. He must. And by the way, that doesn't mean there'll be a general election because it may well be the Labour gets rid of him and brings in another one of their own. But nevertheless, that means Labour goes into the May elections under a new leader, and that means the issue is kept alive because the public, we are sure, will be rightfully outraged at these revelations, and will demand that all of the Labour leadership is held to account for these shenanigans. So the fact that Keir Starmer is still in position is unsustainable. It can no longer be tolerated.” Maajid Nawaz for WARRIOR CREED

أبو عمّار

35,098 次观看 • 8 个月前

Scottie Pippen reveals why his relationship with Michael Jordan will never be the same “I just think that Michael is a very difficult person to deal with. I played with him for years, so I know that.” “When it’s time for you to move in your direction, then go in your direction.” “Don’t sit there and try to procrastinate or stretch it, that the relationship is not where it was and not what it used to be, and it’s never going to be the same.” “So why try and make something out of nothing, or try to make something that was never there.”
1:27

Scottie Pippen reveals why his relationship with Michael Jordan will never be the same “I just think that Michael is a very difficult person to deal with. I played with him for years, so I know that.” “When it’s time for you to move in your direction, then go in your direction.” “Don’t sit there and try to procrastinate or stretch it, that the relationship is not where it was and not what it used to be, and it’s never going to be the same.” “So why try and make something out of nothing, or try to make something that was never there.”

Ahmad Malay 💎🔊

37,749 次观看 • 1 个月前

New video of what is a supposed UAP being struck by a Hellfire missile: Analysis What isn’t discussed at the hearing nor anyone who doesn’t have exposure to footage like this is the fact that the Hellfire missile doesn’t appear to detonate. This is important as it shows the missile only clipping the object, which most likely is a drone. If the missile doesn’t detonate and only clips one of the rotors of a drone (if that’s what this is), then it would explain why the drone could potentially recover and carry on…to a distance longer than the video shows but we don’t know how far that actually was. It could have eventually crashed in the water. Also, important to note that the authorization to use that munition signifies that the user was given a green light at targeting a potential threat. This isn’t done lightly. This means that it was identified enough to a degree to be a potential threat (like an adversarial drone) and was intentionally targeted. That wouldn’t happen if it was a truly unidentified objects or actual alien space ship. They would observe until it was deemed to be hostile in nature. This could also be a potential C-UAS test strike on the efficiencies of targeting in-flight drones with conventional munitions and how accurate they are. But more information needs to be presented to determine that. In conclusion, this appears to be nothing more than a failed strike of what was claimed to be a Hellfire missile on a traveling drone. The munition did not detonate, clipping the object but only to a degree that it still had flight capability after.
0:41

New video of what is a supposed UAP being struck by a Hellfire missile: Analysis What isn’t discussed at the hearing nor anyone who doesn’t have exposure to footage like this is the fact that the Hellfire missile doesn’t appear to detonate. This is important as it shows the missile only clipping the object, which most likely is a drone. If the missile doesn’t detonate and only clips one of the rotors of a drone (if that’s what this is), then it would explain why the drone could potentially recover and carry on…to a distance longer than the video shows but we don’t know how far that actually was. It could have eventually crashed in the water. Also, important to note that the authorization to use that munition signifies that the user was given a green light at targeting a potential threat. This isn’t done lightly. This means that it was identified enough to a degree to be a potential threat (like an adversarial drone) and was intentionally targeted. That wouldn’t happen if it was a truly unidentified objects or actual alien space ship. They would observe until it was deemed to be hostile in nature. This could also be a potential C-UAS test strike on the efficiencies of targeting in-flight drones with conventional munitions and how accurate they are. But more information needs to be presented to determine that. In conclusion, this appears to be nothing more than a failed strike of what was claimed to be a Hellfire missile on a traveling drone. The munition did not detonate, clipping the object but only to a degree that it still had flight capability after.

Chris Unleashed

288,754 次观看 • 1 年前

THE ALL-SEEING EYE is being counted on to track what many thought was IMPOSSIBLE, according to Marc LoPresti, the CEO of Market Rebellion: "So my phone number is tied to my crypto accounts. So if they triangulated that phone, if it is in fact the phone of the perpetrator or a suspect, they could very easily connect it to the Bitcoin wallet and use that deposit to further verify that this was a suspect." Abby Phillip, doing her best to understand what's being discussed, thought that information could just "be hidden" from the government. This guy quickly informed her of the reality about the American government: "The government is one of the top firms, uh, or top organizations that have access to this technology. Remember, the blockchain is immutable. It is a ledger that cannot be changed. The information is there if you know how to get it. The government knows how to get it." If this person was that uneducated about this, why hasn't he already been found?
1:01

THE ALL-SEEING EYE is being counted on to track what many thought was IMPOSSIBLE, according to Marc LoPresti, the CEO of Market Rebellion: "So my phone number is tied to my crypto accounts. So if they triangulated that phone, if it is in fact the phone of the perpetrator or a suspect, they could very easily connect it to the Bitcoin wallet and use that deposit to further verify that this was a suspect." Abby Phillip, doing her best to understand what's being discussed, thought that information could just "be hidden" from the government. This guy quickly informed her of the reality about the American government: "The government is one of the top firms, uh, or top organizations that have access to this technology. Remember, the blockchain is immutable. It is a ledger that cannot be changed. The information is there if you know how to get it. The government knows how to get it." If this person was that uneducated about this, why hasn't he already been found?

Gunther Eagleman™

91,578 次观看 • 7 个月前

She literally never stops lying. The community note on Blake’s post needs to be removed. Here is Candace saying the Prosecution or SBI did it DELIBERATELY: “it was them that decreased the aspect ratio, maybe it was the SBI … but somebody did, and the question is who did it and why did they do it?… because they wanted people to believe that the person that was walking was skinnier than they were … because they are hell bent on presenting an argument that makes people think that Tyler Robinson acted alone.” Blake Neff
0:52

She literally never stops lying. The community note on Blake’s post needs to be removed. Here is Candace saying the Prosecution or SBI did it DELIBERATELY: “it was them that decreased the aspect ratio, maybe it was the SBI … but somebody did, and the question is who did it and why did they do it?… because they wanted people to believe that the person that was walking was skinnier than they were … because they are hell bent on presenting an argument that makes people think that Tyler Robinson acted alone.” Blake Neff

Ally

21,133 次观看 • 1 个月前

Indyref 2014 was rigged, most of it happened in plain sight. Sara Salyers of Salvo.Scot explains how. "In a consultative referendum, an opinion poll, there's no contract, there's no actual requirement, which David Cameron did point out, to abide by the results of that referendum. "So they did not then set it up in the way that a proper constitutional referendum would have been set up according to international standards to begin with. "The people who would be voting in that referendum would be people who had a stake in the future of the nation whose future they were voting on. "We had every boy and his dog able to vote. So people who hadn't been in Scotland for, you know, more than maybe a few months, basically, all these people had a vote on the future of Scotland as an independent nation, which is, if you just think about it, think how absurd that is, people with no stake. "Now, had that been serious, you know, a real referendum, that we were going to be allowed to have a chance of winning, they would have applied international standards, they would have used something like the new Caledonia franchise, which is a really solid. "And it doesn't exclude people who've moved into Scotland. It isn't just ethnic Scots, it's, you know, it's people who have a genuine stake, interest in the future of that nation. That franchise, it shouldn't be a council... local council franchise, it should be one that reflects the stakeholders, who are the real stakeholders, and that's what that needs to be. That it wasn't, should have told us everything. "Then we had the Edinburgh Agreement, and the Edinburgh Agreement said that there was a Purdah period, during which no new policies were to be announced. There was no... you know, all the campaigning would go on and then it stops. You can rehearse the arguments and everything that's been put forward, but nothing new should be introduced. "Well, we got 'The Vow', 'Devo Max', less than two days before the vote. 'If you vote No, you will get this'. Of course, that did not deliver, but it completely breached the Edinburgh Agreement. "Well, what the sad afterwards was, 'Well, there's no evidence that it altered people's minds. Of course it did. Of course it told people, 'Well, if you don't want to go all the way to independence, we could have,' I think Gordon Brown said, 'it would be almost a federal relationship,' you know, blah, blah, blah. "And that that meant people could say, 'Well, if we're afraid of what will happen, afraid of being pulled out of the European Union, we'd like a lot more power, but we were not sure about a total break...'. Well, of course, then they voted No. "Then you also had the media. And in a properly run referendum, according to international rules, you make sure it's 50-50, that people get both sides of the argument, absolutely equally. "There was a full study done, and it took one guy, Glasgow University lecturer in particular, to go through everything and come back and say, 'Look, it was over 70%, 'No' media coverage', and that also breaches international standards. "So we didn't have any possibility of a fair referendum. And that wasn't coincidental. And had there been any kind of vote tampering, say, with the postal vote, because it was only consultative and there was no actual, therefore fraud, it makes it nearly impossible to get a judicial review. "And there is no way, no matter what they have said, no matter what they have told us, 'Get a majority of members elected to Westminster' and that 'You don't need a referendum', or if 'Scotland wants to leave, then it has the right to do so'. No matter what the British State has said, that was never true." Sara Salyers on the @untribalpol @TheScotCongress
3:42

Indyref 2014 was rigged, most of it happened in plain sight. Sara Salyers of Salvo.Scot explains how. "In a consultative referendum, an opinion poll, there's no contract, there's no actual requirement, which David Cameron did point out, to abide by the results of that referendum. "So they did not then set it up in the way that a proper constitutional referendum would have been set up according to international standards to begin with. "The people who would be voting in that referendum would be people who had a stake in the future of the nation whose future they were voting on. "We had every boy and his dog able to vote. So people who hadn't been in Scotland for, you know, more than maybe a few months, basically, all these people had a vote on the future of Scotland as an independent nation, which is, if you just think about it, think how absurd that is, people with no stake. "Now, had that been serious, you know, a real referendum, that we were going to be allowed to have a chance of winning, they would have applied international standards, they would have used something like the new Caledonia franchise, which is a really solid. "And it doesn't exclude people who've moved into Scotland. It isn't just ethnic Scots, it's, you know, it's people who have a genuine stake, interest in the future of that nation. That franchise, it shouldn't be a council... local council franchise, it should be one that reflects the stakeholders, who are the real stakeholders, and that's what that needs to be. That it wasn't, should have told us everything. "Then we had the Edinburgh Agreement, and the Edinburgh Agreement said that there was a Purdah period, during which no new policies were to be announced. There was no... you know, all the campaigning would go on and then it stops. You can rehearse the arguments and everything that's been put forward, but nothing new should be introduced. "Well, we got 'The Vow', 'Devo Max', less than two days before the vote. 'If you vote No, you will get this'. Of course, that did not deliver, but it completely breached the Edinburgh Agreement. "Well, what the sad afterwards was, 'Well, there's no evidence that it altered people's minds. Of course it did. Of course it told people, 'Well, if you don't want to go all the way to independence, we could have,' I think Gordon Brown said, 'it would be almost a federal relationship,' you know, blah, blah, blah. "And that that meant people could say, 'Well, if we're afraid of what will happen, afraid of being pulled out of the European Union, we'd like a lot more power, but we were not sure about a total break...'. Well, of course, then they voted No. "Then you also had the media. And in a properly run referendum, according to international rules, you make sure it's 50-50, that people get both sides of the argument, absolutely equally. "There was a full study done, and it took one guy, Glasgow University lecturer in particular, to go through everything and come back and say, 'Look, it was over 70%, 'No' media coverage', and that also breaches international standards. "So we didn't have any possibility of a fair referendum. And that wasn't coincidental. And had there been any kind of vote tampering, say, with the postal vote, because it was only consultative and there was no actual, therefore fraud, it makes it nearly impossible to get a judicial review. "And there is no way, no matter what they have said, no matter what they have told us, 'Get a majority of members elected to Westminster' and that 'You don't need a referendum', or if 'Scotland wants to leave, then it has the right to do so'. No matter what the British State has said, that was never true." Sara Salyers on the @untribalpol @TheScotCongress

ScotNews

21,718 次观看 • 2 年前

Putin is trying to intimidate the West again “If it comes to a direct attack on the Russian Federation, on Kaliningrad, the question of using all the weapons we have will immediately arise. No one currently has means of destruction like those the Russian Federation has. They were waiting for such a response from us, now they will pull it out and abuse it, running around with the thesis that Russia is threatening with nuclear weapons. We are not threatening anyone, we are not going to attack anyone in 2029, or in 2030, or in 2050, but if we encounter aggression, then we will be forced to respond.”
0:29

Putin is trying to intimidate the West again “If it comes to a direct attack on the Russian Federation, on Kaliningrad, the question of using all the weapons we have will immediately arise. No one currently has means of destruction like those the Russian Federation has. They were waiting for such a response from us, now they will pull it out and abuse it, running around with the thesis that Russia is threatening with nuclear weapons. We are not threatening anyone, we are not going to attack anyone in 2029, or in 2030, or in 2050, but if we encounter aggression, then we will be forced to respond.”

NEXTA

39,628 次观看 • 2 天前

STARMER ARSON TRIAL - DAY THREE Who is ‘El Money’? Why have the police not caught him/her? Why is it so important that the three alleged Ukrainian stooges were being controlled by a Russian? Does he stroke a white Persian cat while sending out Crypto?
0:59

STARMER ARSON TRIAL - DAY THREE Who is ‘El Money’? Why have the police not caught him/her? Why is it so important that the three alleged Ukrainian stooges were being controlled by a Russian? Does he stroke a white Persian cat while sending out Crypto?

The Crispin Flintoff Show

49,926 次观看 • 5 个月前

‼️KUSHNER: When we did the trilateral negotiations, actually Steve and I enjoyed it much more, because everyone was speaking, you know in RUSSIAN to each other and really discussing these issues. In a very actually friendly manner, all in RUSSIAN. ————————————————— This is why you need a real diplomat to manage negotiations. One of the most insensitive and offensive things you can say in a room full of Ukrainians is that “everyone was lovely speaking russian.” Making Ukrainians speak russian is humiliating and feeds russian propaganda that Ukrainians and russians are “one nation with one language.” The very fact that so many Ukrainians know russian is the result of centuries of occupation, russification, and bans on the Ukrainian language imposed by Moscow. Today, Ukrainian POWs are forced to speak russian as part of their abuse in captivity. Their families are forbidden from writing letters to them in Ukrainian. For Ukrainians in captivity, their language is one of the last forms of freedom and identity they still have, and they will be brutally beaten for speaking it or even singing a Ukrainian song. The same goes for the occupied territories, especially Donbas, which russia wants to seize in its entirety so badly. ————————————————— “One thing Steve and I, really thought would be productive is to go back to the trilateral format, which we were able to do about six months ago. And we've spoken with both parties, and so hopefully we'll have progress on that very soon. I think that's important to talk about the big issues obviously, but also some of the some of the de-escalatory issues, that could be done as well. When we did the trilateral, actually Steve and I enjoyed it much more, because we had everyone talking with each other. And instead of us having to argue the Russian position to the Ukrainians and the Ukrainians' position to the Russians, everyone was speaking, you know in Russian to each other and really discussing these issues. In a very actually friendly manner, all in Russian. And I think that was productive. So we're hoping to get back there” - Jared Kushner, U.S. special envoy.
0:43

‼️KUSHNER: When we did the trilateral negotiations, actually Steve and I enjoyed it much more, because everyone was speaking, you know in RUSSIAN to each other and really discussing these issues. In a very actually friendly manner, all in RUSSIAN. ————————————————— This is why you need a real diplomat to manage negotiations. One of the most insensitive and offensive things you can say in a room full of Ukrainians is that “everyone was lovely speaking russian.” Making Ukrainians speak russian is humiliating and feeds russian propaganda that Ukrainians and russians are “one nation with one language.” The very fact that so many Ukrainians know russian is the result of centuries of occupation, russification, and bans on the Ukrainian language imposed by Moscow. Today, Ukrainian POWs are forced to speak russian as part of their abuse in captivity. Their families are forbidden from writing letters to them in Ukrainian. For Ukrainians in captivity, their language is one of the last forms of freedom and identity they still have, and they will be brutally beaten for speaking it or even singing a Ukrainian song. The same goes for the occupied territories, especially Donbas, which russia wants to seize in its entirety so badly. ————————————————— “One thing Steve and I, really thought would be productive is to go back to the trilateral format, which we were able to do about six months ago. And we've spoken with both parties, and so hopefully we'll have progress on that very soon. I think that's important to talk about the big issues obviously, but also some of the some of the de-escalatory issues, that could be done as well. When we did the trilateral, actually Steve and I enjoyed it much more, because we had everyone talking with each other. And instead of us having to argue the Russian position to the Ukrainians and the Ukrainians' position to the Russians, everyone was speaking, you know in Russian to each other and really discussing these issues. In a very actually friendly manner, all in Russian. And I think that was productive. So we're hoping to get back there” - Jared Kushner, U.S. special envoy.

Kateryna Lisunova

195,112 次观看 • 27 天前

Parsi: There is no doubt that we have now, after 20 years of hearing from the hawks, that the only solution is to go to war, we tried it. One third of the U.S. Navy was there in the region. This was not a small operation. This was a major operation short of an actual invasion, and it failed. There is just no doubt that the military operation was not a success. And hopefully, at a minimum, we will not be having that debate again. It has now been settled. It's no longer a theoretical or academic topic. It has been tried, proven to be a failure.
2:04

Parsi: There is no doubt that we have now, after 20 years of hearing from the hawks, that the only solution is to go to war, we tried it. One third of the U.S. Navy was there in the region. This was not a small operation. This was a major operation short of an actual invasion, and it failed. There is just no doubt that the military operation was not a success. And hopefully, at a minimum, we will not be having that debate again. It has now been settled. It's no longer a theoretical or academic topic. It has been tried, proven to be a failure.

Acyn

133,670 次观看 • 3 个月前