Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

It was the Russians what did it….what a total shock…that’s convenient. BUT and it’s a big but, nobody needs to know why or how. The first real day or the Ukranian men’s Keir Starmer trial. We found out from the prosecution that the men were alleged to have been...

JohnHann04's profile picture

John Hannam

28,008 subscribers

19,674 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Old Bailey, 10:30am, the trial of the 3 Ukranian young men who allegedly committed arson against Keir Starmers home and vehicle starts. But you probably wouldn’t know if you were listening to the radio or tv news. Why? Why has it been so silent on what after all, should be a massive story. Why did they do it? What was their motive? How did they know how to locate a home and a car associated with the Prime Minister? We support Ukraine so what provoked their anger? And will the gallery genuinely be open for people to report. Will they be “persuaded” to plead guilty which prevents a trial taking place. So many questions….and the mainstream press are asking none of them🤷‍♂️
4:58

Old Bailey, 10:30am, the trial of the 3 Ukranian young men who allegedly committed arson against Keir Starmers home and vehicle starts. But you probably wouldn’t know if you were listening to the radio or tv news. Why? Why has it been so silent on what after all, should be a massive story. Why did they do it? What was their motive? How did they know how to locate a home and a car associated with the Prime Minister? We support Ukraine so what provoked their anger? And will the gallery genuinely be open for people to report. Will they be “persuaded” to plead guilty which prevents a trial taking place. So many questions….and the mainstream press are asking none of them🤷‍♂️

John Hannam

100,313 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Alastair Crooke: The US🇺🇸 may have signalled that it will resume nuclear weapons testing because Trump misunderstood a Russian missile test as a nuclear test ‘It seems to be based on a misunderstanding. Allegedly, Trump has proposed the idea of nuclear tests in response to Russian nuclear tests. But there hasn’t been a Russian nuclear test. The Burevestnik missile, that was publicised these recent days, like the Oreshnik. But this one has a nuclear power. It has got a propulsion system that is nuclear-based. Its warhead isn’t. There isn’t a nuclear warhead on it. It is a conventional warhead, but it is just instead of having a rocket propulsion, it has a nuclear drive that propels it. And this is why it’s able to stay aloft for a very long time, and in fact traverse the whole globe. But it’s nuclear propulsion, not a nuclear weapon. Did Trump understand that? Or did he just think this was a new nuclear weapon that Russia was testing? He probably didn’t understand that it wasn’t. It was just its propulsion mechanism that is nuclear, but not its warhead. Did Trump understand that? Or did he just think this was a new nuclear weapon that Russia was testing? He probably didn’t understand that it wasn’t. It was just its propulsion mechanism that is nuclear, but not its warhead. Now, whether the Russians have been testing underground before, I doubt it…I’m sure they would have taken every opportunity to say it if they thought they had detected Russian or Chinese underground tests.’ -Alastair Crooke, the former Middle East Advisor to the EU Foreign Policy Chief, on the latest episode of Going Underground FULL INTERVIEW BELOW IN THE REPLIES👇
3:42

Alastair Crooke: The US🇺🇸 may have signalled that it will resume nuclear weapons testing because Trump misunderstood a Russian missile test as a nuclear test ‘It seems to be based on a misunderstanding. Allegedly, Trump has proposed the idea of nuclear tests in response to Russian nuclear tests. But there hasn’t been a Russian nuclear test. The Burevestnik missile, that was publicised these recent days, like the Oreshnik. But this one has a nuclear power. It has got a propulsion system that is nuclear-based. Its warhead isn’t. There isn’t a nuclear warhead on it. It is a conventional warhead, but it is just instead of having a rocket propulsion, it has a nuclear drive that propels it. And this is why it’s able to stay aloft for a very long time, and in fact traverse the whole globe. But it’s nuclear propulsion, not a nuclear weapon. Did Trump understand that? Or did he just think this was a new nuclear weapon that Russia was testing? He probably didn’t understand that it wasn’t. It was just its propulsion mechanism that is nuclear, but not its warhead. Did Trump understand that? Or did he just think this was a new nuclear weapon that Russia was testing? He probably didn’t understand that it wasn’t. It was just its propulsion mechanism that is nuclear, but not its warhead. Now, whether the Russians have been testing underground before, I doubt it…I’m sure they would have taken every opportunity to say it if they thought they had detected Russian or Chinese underground tests.’ -Alastair Crooke, the former Middle East Advisor to the EU Foreign Policy Chief, on the latest episode of Going Underground FULL INTERVIEW BELOW IN THE REPLIES👇

Going Underground

52,238 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

NBC News’ Kristen Welker: “The Danish foreign minister says there hasn’t been a Chinese warship in Greenland for a decade. What evidence do you have that this is a pressing threat?” Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent: “We have asymmetric information. And again, President Trump is being strategic here. What evidence was there that the Russians were going into Crimea? Well, actually there was a lot of evidence that the Russians were going to go into Ukraine. And Joe Biden said, ‘Well, just take a little bit of it.’” “But what we know is that the U.S., that Greenland can only be defended it if is part of the U.S. And it will not need to be defended if it is part of the U.S. The president is trying to avoid a conflict.”
0:56

NBC News’ Kristen Welker: “The Danish foreign minister says there hasn’t been a Chinese warship in Greenland for a decade. What evidence do you have that this is a pressing threat?” Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent: “We have asymmetric information. And again, President Trump is being strategic here. What evidence was there that the Russians were going into Crimea? Well, actually there was a lot of evidence that the Russians were going to go into Ukraine. And Joe Biden said, ‘Well, just take a little bit of it.’” “But what we know is that the U.S., that Greenland can only be defended it if is part of the U.S. And it will not need to be defended if it is part of the U.S. The president is trying to avoid a conflict.”

RedWave Press

976,173 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

“Why does Prime Minister Keir Starmer appear to be so hesitant to go against the wishes of sexual predators? Why did he appear to be so hesitant to prosecute Britain's most notorious pedophile, Sir Jimmy Savile? Why did he appear to be so hesitant to prosecute the key 'grooming' gang underage rape scandal in Rotherham? Why did he appear to be so hesitant to say 'no' to Lord Mandelson, a key Epstein friend who was leaking private government information to Epstein? What is it with Keir Starmer and cases involving sexual predation and sexual exploitation and underage rape? Why does he appear impotent to do anything about them? We've seen a pattern developing and that pattern to our logical minds can only be explained by the fact that it could well be highly likely that they've got something on Keir Starmer too. This man needs to resign. That is the only option. He must go. He must. And by the way, that doesn't mean there'll be a general election because it may well be the Labour gets rid of him and brings in another one of their own. But nevertheless, that means Labour goes into the May elections under a new leader, and that means the issue is kept alive because the public, we are sure, will be rightfully outraged at these revelations, and will demand that all of the Labour leadership is held to account for these shenanigans. So the fact that Keir Starmer is still in position is unsustainable. It can no longer be tolerated.” Maajid Nawaz for WARRIOR CREED
1:39

“Why does Prime Minister Keir Starmer appear to be so hesitant to go against the wishes of sexual predators? Why did he appear to be so hesitant to prosecute Britain's most notorious pedophile, Sir Jimmy Savile? Why did he appear to be so hesitant to prosecute the key 'grooming' gang underage rape scandal in Rotherham? Why did he appear to be so hesitant to say 'no' to Lord Mandelson, a key Epstein friend who was leaking private government information to Epstein? What is it with Keir Starmer and cases involving sexual predation and sexual exploitation and underage rape? Why does he appear impotent to do anything about them? We've seen a pattern developing and that pattern to our logical minds can only be explained by the fact that it could well be highly likely that they've got something on Keir Starmer too. This man needs to resign. That is the only option. He must go. He must. And by the way, that doesn't mean there'll be a general election because it may well be the Labour gets rid of him and brings in another one of their own. But nevertheless, that means Labour goes into the May elections under a new leader, and that means the issue is kept alive because the public, we are sure, will be rightfully outraged at these revelations, and will demand that all of the Labour leadership is held to account for these shenanigans. So the fact that Keir Starmer is still in position is unsustainable. It can no longer be tolerated.” Maajid Nawaz for WARRIOR CREED

أبو عمّار

35,098 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

Optically, they stole the 2020 Election. They were unsuccessful. If they had been successful, we would not be here right now. They were allowed to proceed with certain guardrails in place to keep us out of WW3 and to not let the country fall past the point of no return. The people were too divided. The people were too brainwashed. There would have been a civil war. The four year pause was the only way. Biden was the red pill needed. Was it a show? A lot of it was, yes. Did it come with real life consequences? Yes, which is why I refuse to say it was all a show. It’s time for the difficult truths to be revealed, and people can accept it or reject it, but the truth is still the truth. In my opinion, the first difficult truth to learn is that Trump won the 2020 election, and the world will soon know.
0:37

Optically, they stole the 2020 Election. They were unsuccessful. If they had been successful, we would not be here right now. They were allowed to proceed with certain guardrails in place to keep us out of WW3 and to not let the country fall past the point of no return. The people were too divided. The people were too brainwashed. There would have been a civil war. The four year pause was the only way. Biden was the red pill needed. Was it a show? A lot of it was, yes. Did it come with real life consequences? Yes, which is why I refuse to say it was all a show. It’s time for the difficult truths to be revealed, and people can accept it or reject it, but the truth is still the truth. In my opinion, the first difficult truth to learn is that Trump won the 2020 election, and the world will soon know.

RealAF Patriot

29,747 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

New video of what is a supposed UAP being struck by a Hellfire missile: Analysis What isn’t discussed at the hearing nor anyone who doesn’t have exposure to footage like this is the fact that the Hellfire missile doesn’t appear to detonate. This is important as it shows the missile only clipping the object, which most likely is a drone. If the missile doesn’t detonate and only clips one of the rotors of a drone (if that’s what this is), then it would explain why the drone could potentially recover and carry on…to a distance longer than the video shows but we don’t know how far that actually was. It could have eventually crashed in the water. Also, important to note that the authorization to use that munition signifies that the user was given a green light at targeting a potential threat. This isn’t done lightly. This means that it was identified enough to a degree to be a potential threat (like an adversarial drone) and was intentionally targeted. That wouldn’t happen if it was a truly unidentified objects or actual alien space ship. They would observe until it was deemed to be hostile in nature. This could also be a potential C-UAS test strike on the efficiencies of targeting in-flight drones with conventional munitions and how accurate they are. But more information needs to be presented to determine that. In conclusion, this appears to be nothing more than a failed strike of what was claimed to be a Hellfire missile on a traveling drone. The munition did not detonate, clipping the object but only to a degree that it still had flight capability after.
0:41

New video of what is a supposed UAP being struck by a Hellfire missile: Analysis What isn’t discussed at the hearing nor anyone who doesn’t have exposure to footage like this is the fact that the Hellfire missile doesn’t appear to detonate. This is important as it shows the missile only clipping the object, which most likely is a drone. If the missile doesn’t detonate and only clips one of the rotors of a drone (if that’s what this is), then it would explain why the drone could potentially recover and carry on…to a distance longer than the video shows but we don’t know how far that actually was. It could have eventually crashed in the water. Also, important to note that the authorization to use that munition signifies that the user was given a green light at targeting a potential threat. This isn’t done lightly. This means that it was identified enough to a degree to be a potential threat (like an adversarial drone) and was intentionally targeted. That wouldn’t happen if it was a truly unidentified objects or actual alien space ship. They would observe until it was deemed to be hostile in nature. This could also be a potential C-UAS test strike on the efficiencies of targeting in-flight drones with conventional munitions and how accurate they are. But more information needs to be presented to determine that. In conclusion, this appears to be nothing more than a failed strike of what was claimed to be a Hellfire missile on a traveling drone. The munition did not detonate, clipping the object but only to a degree that it still had flight capability after.

Chris Unleashed

288,723 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

THE ALL-SEEING EYE is being counted on to track what many thought was IMPOSSIBLE, according to Marc LoPresti, the CEO of Market Rebellion: "So my phone number is tied to my crypto accounts. So if they triangulated that phone, if it is in fact the phone of the perpetrator or a suspect, they could very easily connect it to the Bitcoin wallet and use that deposit to further verify that this was a suspect." Abby Phillip, doing her best to understand what's being discussed, thought that information could just "be hidden" from the government. This guy quickly informed her of the reality about the American government: "The government is one of the top firms, uh, or top organizations that have access to this technology. Remember, the blockchain is immutable. It is a ledger that cannot be changed. The information is there if you know how to get it. The government knows how to get it." If this person was that uneducated about this, why hasn't he already been found?
1:01

THE ALL-SEEING EYE is being counted on to track what many thought was IMPOSSIBLE, according to Marc LoPresti, the CEO of Market Rebellion: "So my phone number is tied to my crypto accounts. So if they triangulated that phone, if it is in fact the phone of the perpetrator or a suspect, they could very easily connect it to the Bitcoin wallet and use that deposit to further verify that this was a suspect." Abby Phillip, doing her best to understand what's being discussed, thought that information could just "be hidden" from the government. This guy quickly informed her of the reality about the American government: "The government is one of the top firms, uh, or top organizations that have access to this technology. Remember, the blockchain is immutable. It is a ledger that cannot be changed. The information is there if you know how to get it. The government knows how to get it." If this person was that uneducated about this, why hasn't he already been found?

Gunther Eagleman™

91,578 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

According to this video, we can all attest to it that the problems is not the voters but the electoral process. Why will you have less voters than the number of votes in a poling unit. Any political party that is found disrupting the election or electoral process should not be fined but disqualified. This punishment will be the best lesson for those that plan to do the same.
1:08

According to this video, we can all attest to it that the problems is not the voters but the electoral process. Why will you have less voters than the number of votes in a poling unit. Any political party that is found disrupting the election or electoral process should not be fined but disqualified. This punishment will be the best lesson for those that plan to do the same.

KAEGO ♤

19,972 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

Indyref 2014 was rigged, most of it happened in plain sight. Sara Salyers of Salvo.Scot explains how. "In a consultative referendum, an opinion poll, there's no contract, there's no actual requirement, which David Cameron did point out, to abide by the results of that referendum. "So they did not then set it up in the way that a proper constitutional referendum would have been set up according to international standards to begin with. "The people who would be voting in that referendum would be people who had a stake in the future of the nation whose future they were voting on. "We had every boy and his dog able to vote. So people who hadn't been in Scotland for, you know, more than maybe a few months, basically, all these people had a vote on the future of Scotland as an independent nation, which is, if you just think about it, think how absurd that is, people with no stake. "Now, had that been serious, you know, a real referendum, that we were going to be allowed to have a chance of winning, they would have applied international standards, they would have used something like the new Caledonia franchise, which is a really solid. "And it doesn't exclude people who've moved into Scotland. It isn't just ethnic Scots, it's, you know, it's people who have a genuine stake, interest in the future of that nation. That franchise, it shouldn't be a council... local council franchise, it should be one that reflects the stakeholders, who are the real stakeholders, and that's what that needs to be. That it wasn't, should have told us everything. "Then we had the Edinburgh Agreement, and the Edinburgh Agreement said that there was a Purdah period, during which no new policies were to be announced. There was no... you know, all the campaigning would go on and then it stops. You can rehearse the arguments and everything that's been put forward, but nothing new should be introduced. "Well, we got 'The Vow', 'Devo Max', less than two days before the vote. 'If you vote No, you will get this'. Of course, that did not deliver, but it completely breached the Edinburgh Agreement. "Well, what the sad afterwards was, 'Well, there's no evidence that it altered people's minds. Of course it did. Of course it told people, 'Well, if you don't want to go all the way to independence, we could have,' I think Gordon Brown said, 'it would be almost a federal relationship,' you know, blah, blah, blah. "And that that meant people could say, 'Well, if we're afraid of what will happen, afraid of being pulled out of the European Union, we'd like a lot more power, but we were not sure about a total break...'. Well, of course, then they voted No. "Then you also had the media. And in a properly run referendum, according to international rules, you make sure it's 50-50, that people get both sides of the argument, absolutely equally. "There was a full study done, and it took one guy, Glasgow University lecturer in particular, to go through everything and come back and say, 'Look, it was over 70%, 'No' media coverage', and that also breaches international standards. "So we didn't have any possibility of a fair referendum. And that wasn't coincidental. And had there been any kind of vote tampering, say, with the postal vote, because it was only consultative and there was no actual, therefore fraud, it makes it nearly impossible to get a judicial review. "And there is no way, no matter what they have said, no matter what they have told us, 'Get a majority of members elected to Westminster' and that 'You don't need a referendum', or if 'Scotland wants to leave, then it has the right to do so'. No matter what the British State has said, that was never true." Sara Salyers on the @untribalpol @TheScotCongress
3:42

Indyref 2014 was rigged, most of it happened in plain sight. Sara Salyers of Salvo.Scot explains how. "In a consultative referendum, an opinion poll, there's no contract, there's no actual requirement, which David Cameron did point out, to abide by the results of that referendum. "So they did not then set it up in the way that a proper constitutional referendum would have been set up according to international standards to begin with. "The people who would be voting in that referendum would be people who had a stake in the future of the nation whose future they were voting on. "We had every boy and his dog able to vote. So people who hadn't been in Scotland for, you know, more than maybe a few months, basically, all these people had a vote on the future of Scotland as an independent nation, which is, if you just think about it, think how absurd that is, people with no stake. "Now, had that been serious, you know, a real referendum, that we were going to be allowed to have a chance of winning, they would have applied international standards, they would have used something like the new Caledonia franchise, which is a really solid. "And it doesn't exclude people who've moved into Scotland. It isn't just ethnic Scots, it's, you know, it's people who have a genuine stake, interest in the future of that nation. That franchise, it shouldn't be a council... local council franchise, it should be one that reflects the stakeholders, who are the real stakeholders, and that's what that needs to be. That it wasn't, should have told us everything. "Then we had the Edinburgh Agreement, and the Edinburgh Agreement said that there was a Purdah period, during which no new policies were to be announced. There was no... you know, all the campaigning would go on and then it stops. You can rehearse the arguments and everything that's been put forward, but nothing new should be introduced. "Well, we got 'The Vow', 'Devo Max', less than two days before the vote. 'If you vote No, you will get this'. Of course, that did not deliver, but it completely breached the Edinburgh Agreement. "Well, what the sad afterwards was, 'Well, there's no evidence that it altered people's minds. Of course it did. Of course it told people, 'Well, if you don't want to go all the way to independence, we could have,' I think Gordon Brown said, 'it would be almost a federal relationship,' you know, blah, blah, blah. "And that that meant people could say, 'Well, if we're afraid of what will happen, afraid of being pulled out of the European Union, we'd like a lot more power, but we were not sure about a total break...'. Well, of course, then they voted No. "Then you also had the media. And in a properly run referendum, according to international rules, you make sure it's 50-50, that people get both sides of the argument, absolutely equally. "There was a full study done, and it took one guy, Glasgow University lecturer in particular, to go through everything and come back and say, 'Look, it was over 70%, 'No' media coverage', and that also breaches international standards. "So we didn't have any possibility of a fair referendum. And that wasn't coincidental. And had there been any kind of vote tampering, say, with the postal vote, because it was only consultative and there was no actual, therefore fraud, it makes it nearly impossible to get a judicial review. "And there is no way, no matter what they have said, no matter what they have told us, 'Get a majority of members elected to Westminster' and that 'You don't need a referendum', or if 'Scotland wants to leave, then it has the right to do so'. No matter what the British State has said, that was never true." Sara Salyers on the @untribalpol @TheScotCongress

ScotNews

21,466 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

I shared a video from Nick Freitas yesterday about how to encourage and reach young men. You should check it out if you didn’t see it. Now, here is a clip that shows how to repel and discourage young men. This is so frustrating, Sean DeMars and Neil Shenvi. Leaving aside the whole “woke right” thing, whatever. You acknowledge that the Left has total cultural control. Then you mock the idea that white men are systemically discriminated against in our culture, or that we live in an effeminate gynocracy. What do you think the Left does with its total cultural control? You mock young men by claiming that their discrimination has no basis in reality, but has to be understood via some “gnostic” higher knowledge. This is not fair. We are starting to get more and more hard data on this issue. I will admit that there is an element of “look around, this should be obvious.” It should be, and you’re really sticking your head in the sand to deny these things. But being on the Right is to believe in God’s created reality. It’s not about “lived experience,” it’s about what is actually true. White men are being discriminated against in this culture, and the West has been feminized radically in the last 60 years. The biggest problem with the woke was always that they were wrong, beyond even their philosophical system. It wasn’t merely that they were claiming to be oppressed, but it was that this claim was wrong. "This argument sounds like that argument" is just so lazy when one was factually wrong, and one is factually right. The claims of the Right are correct in general. But at the end of the day, good luck crapping on young men like this. We'll see how that works out for you. I won’t be joining you.
3:05

I shared a video from Nick Freitas yesterday about how to encourage and reach young men. You should check it out if you didn’t see it. Now, here is a clip that shows how to repel and discourage young men. This is so frustrating, Sean DeMars and Neil Shenvi. Leaving aside the whole “woke right” thing, whatever. You acknowledge that the Left has total cultural control. Then you mock the idea that white men are systemically discriminated against in our culture, or that we live in an effeminate gynocracy. What do you think the Left does with its total cultural control? You mock young men by claiming that their discrimination has no basis in reality, but has to be understood via some “gnostic” higher knowledge. This is not fair. We are starting to get more and more hard data on this issue. I will admit that there is an element of “look around, this should be obvious.” It should be, and you’re really sticking your head in the sand to deny these things. But being on the Right is to believe in God’s created reality. It’s not about “lived experience,” it’s about what is actually true. White men are being discriminated against in this culture, and the West has been feminized radically in the last 60 years. The biggest problem with the woke was always that they were wrong, beyond even their philosophical system. It wasn’t merely that they were claiming to be oppressed, but it was that this claim was wrong. "This argument sounds like that argument" is just so lazy when one was factually wrong, and one is factually right. The claims of the Right are correct in general. But at the end of the day, good luck crapping on young men like this. We'll see how that works out for you. I won’t be joining you.

Nate Schlomann

47,845 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

STARMER ARSON TRIAL - DAY THREE Who is ‘El Money’? Why have the police not caught him/her? Why is it so important that the three alleged Ukrainian stooges were being controlled by a Russian? Does he stroke a white Persian cat while sending out Crypto?
0:59

STARMER ARSON TRIAL - DAY THREE Who is ‘El Money’? Why have the police not caught him/her? Why is it so important that the three alleged Ukrainian stooges were being controlled by a Russian? Does he stroke a white Persian cat while sending out Crypto?

The Crispin Flintoff Show

49,926 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

The Anchormen on Israel using a nuclear weapon against Iran: GAETZ: “If Israel believes that this bombing campaign of the United States, that is relentless and effective at destroying infrastructure and military material, but not effective at regime change. If they don’t think that’s enough to send Iran into chaos, they may use the nuclear weapon we all know they have. I shudder to think that. I would like to believe that no country would do that again, and so I’m not of that ilk yet, but the argument was made.” SHARP: “What would the consequences be? Is the U.S. gonna bomb Israel? How is that gonna shake out? Who’s gonna hold them account for that? Not that I think Israel wouldn’t do it. They have their pathological hatred of Iran and they wanna take that region out, and they have the Greater Israel objective. From a philosophical standpoint, they wouldn’t have a problem with it, but God, what would the consequences be?” WATCH NOW:
1:14

The Anchormen on Israel using a nuclear weapon against Iran: GAETZ: “If Israel believes that this bombing campaign of the United States, that is relentless and effective at destroying infrastructure and military material, but not effective at regime change. If they don’t think that’s enough to send Iran into chaos, they may use the nuclear weapon we all know they have. I shudder to think that. I would like to believe that no country would do that again, and so I’m not of that ilk yet, but the argument was made.” SHARP: “What would the consequences be? Is the U.S. gonna bomb Israel? How is that gonna shake out? Who’s gonna hold them account for that? Not that I think Israel wouldn’t do it. They have their pathological hatred of Iran and they wanna take that region out, and they have the Greater Israel objective. From a philosophical standpoint, they wouldn’t have a problem with it, but God, what would the consequences be?” WATCH NOW:

Former Congressman Matt Gaetz

122,267 görüntüleme • 10 gün önce

THIS WOMAN SEEMS TO KNOW AT LEAST A COMPARTMENTALIZED SECTION OF THE TRUTH: I find it very interesting that this woman talks about the contracts with what she calls the "Greys" existing, but what I find extremely interesting is how does she know that this contract expired? I have only released that information recently and I am the only whistleblower that has ever said that I even gave the time when it expired and why. And it originally was with one of the 11 types of Grey species; ETE-1. In light of that, I find This woman's story to be credible. And in the context of her father, I would have to assume they once he found these documents he called her or text her and told her but he found them and he would be leaving with them. Otherwise how would she know? The accident could have been a coincidence, maybe not. But I find her story to be extremely credible because she knew something that no one else knew before I released it. Take a listen;
2:24

THIS WOMAN SEEMS TO KNOW AT LEAST A COMPARTMENTALIZED SECTION OF THE TRUTH: I find it very interesting that this woman talks about the contracts with what she calls the "Greys" existing, but what I find extremely interesting is how does she know that this contract expired? I have only released that information recently and I am the only whistleblower that has ever said that I even gave the time when it expired and why. And it originally was with one of the 11 types of Grey species; ETE-1. In light of that, I find This woman's story to be credible. And in the context of her father, I would have to assume they once he found these documents he called her or text her and told her but he found them and he would be leaving with them. Otherwise how would she know? The accident could have been a coincidence, maybe not. But I find her story to be extremely credible because she knew something that no one else knew before I released it. Take a listen;

WHISTLEBLOWER

203,353 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Parsi: There is no doubt that we have now, after 20 years of hearing from the hawks, that the only solution is to go to war, we tried it. One third of the U.S. Navy was there in the region. This was not a small operation. This was a major operation short of an actual invasion, and it failed. There is just no doubt that the military operation was not a success. And hopefully, at a minimum, we will not be having that debate again. It has now been settled. It's no longer a theoretical or academic topic. It has been tried, proven to be a failure.
2:04

Parsi: There is no doubt that we have now, after 20 years of hearing from the hawks, that the only solution is to go to war, we tried it. One third of the U.S. Navy was there in the region. This was not a small operation. This was a major operation short of an actual invasion, and it failed. There is just no doubt that the military operation was not a success. And hopefully, at a minimum, we will not be having that debate again. It has now been settled. It's no longer a theoretical or academic topic. It has been tried, proven to be a failure.

Acyn

133,603 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

There is no way that Melania and Donald did not know what was happening with Maxwell and Epstein; it makes sense as to why Trump is losing it. The truth will come out; the victims of this deserve all the abusers' names to be told. #DemsUnited #EpsteinTrumpFiles
2:03

There is no way that Melania and Donald did not know what was happening with Maxwell and Epstein; it makes sense as to why Trump is losing it. The truth will come out; the victims of this deserve all the abusers' names to be told. #DemsUnited #EpsteinTrumpFiles

Rod (Izzy) Ⓜ️Ⓜ️ 🇺🇸🦅

205,964 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

We do not know who the target of this was or why the shooter did what they did. Don’t jump to a conclusion that you don’t know answers to. Violence is never the answer.
0:24

We do not know who the target of this was or why the shooter did what they did. Don’t jump to a conclusion that you don’t know answers to. Violence is never the answer.

Brian Krassenstein

86,158 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

AOC: I think it’s pretty unbelievable that Gaza would not be mentioned once in the autopsy report. I think it was very clearly a major dynamic and a major thread that was happening in 2024. The fact that it’s not even addressed, I think, is a major oversight. And I think that for young people, it was a huge part of the environment. I can tell you for myself as a candidate during that cycle, there’s no way that it was an ignorable issue or totally immaterial. So I think that it’s a real disservice to not speak to that or include or assess that.
0:54

AOC: I think it’s pretty unbelievable that Gaza would not be mentioned once in the autopsy report. I think it was very clearly a major dynamic and a major thread that was happening in 2024. The fact that it’s not even addressed, I think, is a major oversight. And I think that for young people, it was a huge part of the environment. I can tell you for myself as a candidate during that cycle, there’s no way that it was an ignorable issue or totally immaterial. So I think that it’s a real disservice to not speak to that or include or assess that.

Acyn

694,891 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce