Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

It wasn't a dramatically wrong performance by Andrew Wilson in the debate vs. Candace, but he came short of the high expectations that he had created for himself. Here I lay out my reasoning on the weaknesses in the performance. Though I still believe Candace is mostly wrong, I...

JFGariepy's profile picture

Jean-François Gariépy 🧬

72,287 subscribers

17,188 views • 1 month ago •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

⚡🚨 UNBELIEVABLE: Brandon Tatum did a watch-along of the Candace Owens vs. Andrew Wilson debate, and the ENTIRE time he was mocking Candace and claiming what she was saying wasn't true. He's a snake in the grass.
1:00

⚡🚨 UNBELIEVABLE: Brandon Tatum did a watch-along of the Candace Owens vs. Andrew Wilson debate, and the ENTIRE time he was mocking Candace and claiming what she was saying wasn't true. He's a snake in the grass.

Jody Chase

111,608 views • 1 month ago

🚨 Andrew Wilson accuses Candace Owens of cheating during their debate by having her team feed her answers through her earpiece, but also says he will "take the L" on that exchange. Andrew also claims Candace "doesn't believe a word" she says regarding the Charlie Kirk case and dubs his foot tapping "The Wilson shake."
8:33

🚨 Andrew Wilson accuses Candace Owens of cheating during their debate by having her team feed her answers through her earpiece, but also says he will "take the L" on that exchange. Andrew also claims Candace "doesn't believe a word" she says regarding the Charlie Kirk case and dubs his foot tapping "The Wilson shake."

LogicBender

54,161 views • 1 month ago

Jeremy Boreing says firing Candace Owens was morally necessary and admits he wishes he had done it sooner. "We terminated Candace Owens, which I feel like was a moral important thing to do and important for the health of the conservative movement more broadly." "10/10 times I would have fired her again, 9/10 times I would have fired her two months earlier." "I had misgivings about Candace when we hired her, but on the whole I believe that she was and would continue to be a force for good. I believe that we could successfully help her trend in a positive direction." "I believed and still believe that she has the most star power of any person I've ever met. That's after 20 years in Hollywood. I mean, I've met giant movie stars. Candace has more of it than any other personality I've ever encountered." "So in retrospect, is it a mistake that I hired her? Sure, because of the way it played out, but I still would have hired her, you know, 7/10 do overs."
1:29

Jeremy Boreing says firing Candace Owens was morally necessary and admits he wishes he had done it sooner. "We terminated Candace Owens, which I feel like was a moral important thing to do and important for the health of the conservative movement more broadly." "10/10 times I would have fired her again, 9/10 times I would have fired her two months earlier." "I had misgivings about Candace when we hired her, but on the whole I believe that she was and would continue to be a force for good. I believe that we could successfully help her trend in a positive direction." "I believed and still believe that she has the most star power of any person I've ever met. That's after 20 years in Hollywood. I mean, I've met giant movie stars. Candace has more of it than any other personality I've ever encountered." "So in retrospect, is it a mistake that I hired her? Sure, because of the way it played out, but I still would have hired her, you know, 7/10 do overs."

PBD Podcast

167,981 views • 3 months ago

Watch how many times Andrew Wilson had to ask Candace Owens whether Lance Twiggs’ DNA was found on Tyler Robinson’s rifle during the debate - a claim she was lying about up until a week before the debate. Candace herself admits she realized the claim was wrong - so why didn’t she correct it for her audience? It took a $300,000 paycheck in the form of a debate with Andrew Wilson - and being confronted with the same question over and over again - but it was only at the point of Wilson going to play a clip of her saying it that she finally acknowledge that what she had been telling her audience was wrong. The most hilarious part? On her show today, Candace declared that she’s all about accountability and admitting to her audience when she makes mistakes.
3:50

Watch how many times Andrew Wilson had to ask Candace Owens whether Lance Twiggs’ DNA was found on Tyler Robinson’s rifle during the debate - a claim she was lying about up until a week before the debate. Candace herself admits she realized the claim was wrong - so why didn’t she correct it for her audience? It took a $300,000 paycheck in the form of a debate with Andrew Wilson - and being confronted with the same question over and over again - but it was only at the point of Wilson going to play a clip of her saying it that she finally acknowledge that what she had been telling her audience was wrong. The most hilarious part? On her show today, Candace declared that she’s all about accountability and admitting to her audience when she makes mistakes.

Nathan Livingstone (MilkBarTV)

80,762 views • 1 month ago

I actually hate to say this, but Candace Owens completely dominated the debate with Andrew Wilson. She won. Andrew lost. And it’s massively disappointing. Andrew had so many chances to press her and he didn’t. No one changed their minds from this debate. That means Candace won.
2:58

I actually hate to say this, but Candace Owens completely dominated the debate with Andrew Wilson. She won. Andrew lost. And it’s massively disappointing. Andrew had so many chances to press her and he didn’t. No one changed their minds from this debate. That means Candace won.

Karlyn Borysenko, anti-communist cult leader

36,087 views • 1 month ago

🔥👀 WOW. “Do you have any evidence that Erika Kirk or TPUSA participated in the murder of Charlie Kirk?” - Andrew Wilson “I never said that” - Candace Owens “So you don’t believe they did” - Wilson “I’ve never said that statement … so I’m not gonna get you to ask me personal question about things I never said” - Candace A video is then played where Candace says France & Israel are involved. Candace is getting upset that Andrew Wilson is asking for positive evidence of her claims on PBD Podcast during the debate.
4:32

🔥👀 WOW. “Do you have any evidence that Erika Kirk or TPUSA participated in the murder of Charlie Kirk?” - Andrew Wilson “I never said that” - Candace Owens “So you don’t believe they did” - Wilson “I’ve never said that statement … so I’m not gonna get you to ask me personal question about things I never said” - Candace A video is then played where Candace says France & Israel are involved. Candace is getting upset that Andrew Wilson is asking for positive evidence of her claims on PBD Podcast during the debate.

Johnny St.Pete

21,068 views • 1 month ago

🚨🇺🇸 CANDACE OWENS: CHARLIE KIRK CAME TO ME IN A DREAM AND TOLD ME HE WAS BETRAYED Owens says Charlie Kirk appeared to her in a dream over the weekend, telling her he was “betrayed”: “You don't have to believe that, but I believe that... I believe it will be inevitably revealed.” Source: Candace Owens Clip: The Calvin Coolidge Project
0:35

🚨🇺🇸 CANDACE OWENS: CHARLIE KIRK CAME TO ME IN A DREAM AND TOLD ME HE WAS BETRAYED Owens says Charlie Kirk appeared to her in a dream over the weekend, telling her he was “betrayed”: “You don't have to believe that, but I believe that... I believe it will be inevitably revealed.” Source: Candace Owens Clip: The Calvin Coolidge Project

Mario Nawfal

1,844,310 views • 11 months ago

WOW 😮 Candace Owens is pretending that she’s going to debate Andrew Wilson‼️ Candace has been ducking debates for nearly a year but now she’s supposedly accepted the offer to debate Andrew Wilson. BUT THERE’S A CATCH. Candace refuses to debate alone. She demands that her entire team can basically debate for her. She wants to be in her home studio. Ear piece in. With multiple people feeding her information and trying to fact check her opponent. BUT NOT JUST THAT. She also demands that TPUSA publicly announces that Andrew Wilson is debating for them on their behalf. So long story short Candace isn’t really trying to debate. I also thought it was gross that Candace is acting like Andrew is a peasant because he doesn’t have $500,000 sitting around. If she thinks this lowly of Andrew because he isn’t filthy rich like her just imagine how she really feels about her fans.
1:52

WOW 😮 Candace Owens is pretending that she’s going to debate Andrew Wilson‼️ Candace has been ducking debates for nearly a year but now she’s supposedly accepted the offer to debate Andrew Wilson. BUT THERE’S A CATCH. Candace refuses to debate alone. She demands that her entire team can basically debate for her. She wants to be in her home studio. Ear piece in. With multiple people feeding her information and trying to fact check her opponent. BUT NOT JUST THAT. She also demands that TPUSA publicly announces that Andrew Wilson is debating for them on their behalf. So long story short Candace isn’t really trying to debate. I also thought it was gross that Candace is acting like Andrew is a peasant because he doesn’t have $500,000 sitting around. If she thinks this lowly of Andrew because he isn’t filthy rich like her just imagine how she really feels about her fans.

Cinema Shogun

51,895 views • 1 month ago

🔥 ANDREW WILSON SOUNDS OFF ON CANDACE OWENS’ “COMPLICIT” CLAIMS Andrew Wilson says one of the most revealing moments of their debate came when Owens denied saying Erika Kirk was “complicit” in Charlie Kirk’s death — then explained what she actually meant by “complicit.” But Wilson says the bigger issue goes far beyond one debate. He accuses Owens and people in her orbit of using the label of “investigators” to justify targeting people they believe are part of a conspiracy
4:31

🔥 ANDREW WILSON SOUNDS OFF ON CANDACE OWENS’ “COMPLICIT” CLAIMS Andrew Wilson says one of the most revealing moments of their debate came when Owens denied saying Erika Kirk was “complicit” in Charlie Kirk’s death — then explained what she actually meant by “complicit.” But Wilson says the bigger issue goes far beyond one debate. He accuses Owens and people in her orbit of using the label of “investigators” to justify targeting people they believe are part of a conspiracy

Real America's Voice (RAV)

15,768 views • 1 month ago

Michael Knowles responds to Candace Owens and Andrew Wilson debate‼️ Andrew suggested that Michael could be a moderator and Candace accepted. However neither party had previously checked with Michael to see if he would do it. He says he thinks the case against Tyler Robinson should be debated in the actual courtroom and not in the court of public opinion. But he says he’s still thinking about doing it though and wants to hear from people with strong opinions over whether or not he should. SO LET’S HEAR IT 👂 You have strong opinions. I don’t care if you’re a Candace Owens fan or an Andrew Wilson fan. DO YOU THINK MICHAEL KNOWLES SHOULD MODERATE THIS DEBATE⁉️ Personally I have no real preferences over who moderates and I’m sure Michael Knowles could do a good job. I just know that a moderator (a much better one than Sneako) is most definitely needed in this debate or else Candace will immediately go off the rails.
1:05

Michael Knowles responds to Candace Owens and Andrew Wilson debate‼️ Andrew suggested that Michael could be a moderator and Candace accepted. However neither party had previously checked with Michael to see if he would do it. He says he thinks the case against Tyler Robinson should be debated in the actual courtroom and not in the court of public opinion. But he says he’s still thinking about doing it though and wants to hear from people with strong opinions over whether or not he should. SO LET’S HEAR IT 👂 You have strong opinions. I don’t care if you’re a Candace Owens fan or an Andrew Wilson fan. DO YOU THINK MICHAEL KNOWLES SHOULD MODERATE THIS DEBATE⁉️ Personally I have no real preferences over who moderates and I’m sure Michael Knowles could do a good job. I just know that a moderator (a much better one than Sneako) is most definitely needed in this debate or else Candace will immediately go off the rails.

Cinema Shogun

96,063 views • 1 month ago

🚨BREAKING: Candace Owens demands a fact check, then accidentally fact-checks herself with Tyler Robinson’s own admission. CANDACE: “How are you able to infer off blurry images that is Tyler Robinson?” ANDREW: “You combine it with other evidence. Tyler Robinson said in his own text messages, ‘You’ll be able to see me on security footage on campus.’” CANDACE: “I don’t remember him saying, ‘You’re going to see me in footage.’ Can we get a fact check on that?” ANDREW: “Lance Twiggs himself said it sure looked like Tyler Robinson in the surveillance footage. There are multiple reasons why I believe that’s Tyler Robinson.” CANDACE: “I don’t remember him texting, ‘That’s me on the staircase.’” ANDREW: “I didn’t say that. I said he texted that you’ll be able to see him in footage at UVU. I’m paraphrasing, but that’s what he said.” CANDACE: “Could we get a fact check on that?” Candace then reads the court document: “It was me. Look at the pictures from the surveillance footage. It was me.” ANDREW: “Ooooofff.” Candace Owens Andrew Wilson Patrick Bet-David
2:12

🚨BREAKING: Candace Owens demands a fact check, then accidentally fact-checks herself with Tyler Robinson’s own admission. CANDACE: “How are you able to infer off blurry images that is Tyler Robinson?” ANDREW: “You combine it with other evidence. Tyler Robinson said in his own text messages, ‘You’ll be able to see me on security footage on campus.’” CANDACE: “I don’t remember him saying, ‘You’re going to see me in footage.’ Can we get a fact check on that?” ANDREW: “Lance Twiggs himself said it sure looked like Tyler Robinson in the surveillance footage. There are multiple reasons why I believe that’s Tyler Robinson.” CANDACE: “I don’t remember him texting, ‘That’s me on the staircase.’” ANDREW: “I didn’t say that. I said he texted that you’ll be able to see him in footage at UVU. I’m paraphrasing, but that’s what he said.” CANDACE: “Could we get a fact check on that?” Candace then reads the court document: “It was me. Look at the pictures from the surveillance footage. It was me.” ANDREW: “Ooooofff.” Candace Owens Andrew Wilson Patrick Bet-David

KanekoaTheGreat

1,136,002 views • 1 month ago

Nick declares the debate between Candace Owens and Andrew Wilson a draw. Despite Candace admitting she had no evidence or proof behind her beliefs, Andrew's poor performance didn't give him the win. "He was far too charitable, far too good faith."
5:04

Nick declares the debate between Candace Owens and Andrew Wilson a draw. Despite Candace admitting she had no evidence or proof behind her beliefs, Andrew's poor performance didn't give him the win. "He was far too charitable, far too good faith."

Asuka Groyper 🚬

17,926 views • 1 month ago

Is Candace Only In It For The Money? I don't believe Candace Owens is investigating or speaking about the Charlie Kirk narrative "for the money." In this clip with Viva Frei I explain why I believe Candace would have actually made much more money in the long term by accepting the official story and saying nothing. My belief is that the temporary increase in attention and profitability has an objective conclusion as it relates to this topic. In the end, if it turned out that she was flat out wrong about everything, it would severely affect her earning potential and trustworthiness in the future. It is for this reason that I disagree with the premise that she is purely profit/attention motivated. The downside risk of being categorically wrong would make the temporary spike not worth the future risk. I believe she would have earned more in the aggregate over time by saying nothing. I find the "she's only in it for money" objection to her investigation to be inaccurate for this reason. This was a great discussion that covered far more than just this topic, but this was an interesting back and forth. Many people will meet this clip with criticism, and that's OK. But to me, this is the most logical business-minded reaction to why I think she's not just doing it for money. There are other reasons I believe this, but this a more income potential/business-minded breakdown of my disagreement with that criticism.
1:41

Is Candace Only In It For The Money? I don't believe Candace Owens is investigating or speaking about the Charlie Kirk narrative "for the money." In this clip with Viva Frei I explain why I believe Candace would have actually made much more money in the long term by accepting the official story and saying nothing. My belief is that the temporary increase in attention and profitability has an objective conclusion as it relates to this topic. In the end, if it turned out that she was flat out wrong about everything, it would severely affect her earning potential and trustworthiness in the future. It is for this reason that I disagree with the premise that she is purely profit/attention motivated. The downside risk of being categorically wrong would make the temporary spike not worth the future risk. I believe she would have earned more in the aggregate over time by saying nothing. I find the "she's only in it for money" objection to her investigation to be inaccurate for this reason. This was a great discussion that covered far more than just this topic, but this was an interesting back and forth. Many people will meet this clip with criticism, and that's OK. But to me, this is the most logical business-minded reaction to why I think she's not just doing it for money. There are other reasons I believe this, but this a more income potential/business-minded breakdown of my disagreement with that criticism.

Bobby Sauce

31,061 views • 1 month ago

Andrew Wilson gives his closing remarks in his debate against Candace Owens. He reiterated that Candace provided zero evidence for her claims that Tyler Robinson was a "patsy" and that he himself isn't a perfect man. He also acknowledged the debate may have been a stalemate.
3:31

Andrew Wilson gives his closing remarks in his debate against Candace Owens. He reiterated that Candace provided zero evidence for her claims that Tyler Robinson was a "patsy" and that he himself isn't a perfect man. He also acknowledged the debate may have been a stalemate.

Evan Kilgore 🇺🇸

54,355 views • 1 month ago

Check out this crazy Candace Owens fan. Well … she’s probably a fan of Candace, because she doesn’t believe in evidence. But she does believe in accusing people of murder on no basis at all. She said that Lindsay Clancy’s husband murdered the kids because … he has a birthday the same as Donald Trump’s 🧐.
0:40

Check out this crazy Candace Owens fan. Well … she’s probably a fan of Candace, because she doesn’t believe in evidence. But she does believe in accusing people of murder on no basis at all. She said that Lindsay Clancy’s husband murdered the kids because … he has a birthday the same as Donald Trump’s 🧐.

Bren

129,615 views • 1 month ago

🚨BREAKING: Michael Knowles says he won't moderate a debate between Candace Owens and Andrew Wilson. "The evidence is pretty clear Tyler Robinson murdered Charlie Kirk." "I am certainly convinced that the guilt for Charlie's murder should be adjudicated with gravity and sobriety in a court of law rather than in an ouroboros of endless, not to mention lucrative, podcasts." "The only silver lining in the storm cloud of Charlie's murder was the brief unity it brought to the right." "The right came together as leftists revealed their rot and cruelty by justifying and celebrating Charlie's murder." "Soon after, however, a cottage industry sprang up of Charlie murder content." "Candace, of course, launched her series on the subject, which I've said many times since the beginning I thought was wrong and wish she shouldn't do it, but it got lots of views."
3:01

🚨BREAKING: Michael Knowles says he won't moderate a debate between Candace Owens and Andrew Wilson. "The evidence is pretty clear Tyler Robinson murdered Charlie Kirk." "I am certainly convinced that the guilt for Charlie's murder should be adjudicated with gravity and sobriety in a court of law rather than in an ouroboros of endless, not to mention lucrative, podcasts." "The only silver lining in the storm cloud of Charlie's murder was the brief unity it brought to the right." "The right came together as leftists revealed their rot and cruelty by justifying and celebrating Charlie's murder." "Soon after, however, a cottage industry sprang up of Charlie murder content." "Candace, of course, launched her series on the subject, which I've said many times since the beginning I thought was wrong and wish she shouldn't do it, but it got lots of views."

KanekoaTheGreat

259,211 views • 1 month ago

HUGO BROOS 👴 Bathusi Aubaas came in & stabilized the middlefield. There was movement in our attacks. Pace on the ball Yaya Sithole's performance is indescribable. He was losing a lot of balls. He made bad passes & wrong decisions I even doubt that I will continue playing him again. But i will see it. Bathusi did what we needed in that position #BafanaBafana #BafanaKaofela #bafana #TotalEnergiesAFCON2025 #TotalEnergiesAFCON25
1:26

HUGO BROOS 👴 Bathusi Aubaas came in & stabilized the middlefield. There was movement in our attacks. Pace on the ball Yaya Sithole's performance is indescribable. He was losing a lot of balls. He made bad passes & wrong decisions I even doubt that I will continue playing him again. But i will see it. Bathusi did what we needed in that position #BafanaBafana #BafanaKaofela #bafana #TotalEnergiesAFCON2025 #TotalEnergiesAFCON25

Constitution First 🇿🇦

70,083 views • 8 months ago

Candace Owens calls for a fact-check on whether Tyler Robinson ever said he'd be seen on security footage at UVU. The fact-check arrives. She reads Robinson's words out loud, and Wilson embraces the moment with a big "OOF!" CANDACE: "Okay, so let's address those multitude of evidences. The first one, we're working on a fact check on, because I do not ever remember him texting that, 'That's me in the staircase.'" WILSON: "I didn't say that. What I said is that he texted over, 'You'll be able to see me in footage at UVU' — and I'm paraphrasing, but that's what he said." CANDACE: "Yeah, could we get a fact check on that?" PBD: "If you want to pull it up. You said you have the text? If we can put that up on the screen. Thank you." CANDACE: "'It was me. Look at the pictures from the surveillance footage. It was me.'" WILSON: "Oof!" CANDACE: "It's not an 'oof.' I said I didn't remember this, and I'm happy to have a fact check on that. I didn't call for the fact check saying you're wrong. I literally said, 'I don't remember that from the texts.'"
0:45

Candace Owens calls for a fact-check on whether Tyler Robinson ever said he'd be seen on security footage at UVU. The fact-check arrives. She reads Robinson's words out loud, and Wilson embraces the moment with a big "OOF!" CANDACE: "Okay, so let's address those multitude of evidences. The first one, we're working on a fact check on, because I do not ever remember him texting that, 'That's me in the staircase.'" WILSON: "I didn't say that. What I said is that he texted over, 'You'll be able to see me in footage at UVU' — and I'm paraphrasing, but that's what he said." CANDACE: "Yeah, could we get a fact check on that?" PBD: "If you want to pull it up. You said you have the text? If we can put that up on the screen. Thank you." CANDACE: "'It was me. Look at the pictures from the surveillance footage. It was me.'" WILSON: "Oof!" CANDACE: "It's not an 'oof.' I said I didn't remember this, and I'm happy to have a fact check on that. I didn't call for the fact check saying you're wrong. I literally said, 'I don't remember that from the texts.'"

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

483,792 views • 1 month ago

‼️Candace REACTS To The MOST Viral Moment Of The Debate — Andrew Wilson Couldn’t Name a SINGLE Charge Against Tyler Robinson😂 Candace asked a basic question. “Which of the charges do you think Tyler Robinson is guilty of?” Wilson had spent the entire lead-up claiming the evidence was overwhelming. He had even tweeted about the defense’s latest filing like he was locked in. Candace assumed any serious person showing up to debate Tyler’s guilt would at least know what he was charged with. She was wrong. He couldn’t name one. When pressed, he tried the false bravado (“of course I know them”) and then completely fell apart. Candace had to list all seven charges for him while he sat there sweating. Aggravated murder. Felony discharge of a firearm. Two counts of obstruction of justice. Two counts of witness tampering. Commission of a violent offense in the presence of a minor. This man came to argue that Tyler Robinson is guilty… and did not know guilty of what. That moment said everything. He never watched the preliminary hearing. He never read the filings. He showed up to defend a narrative he hadn’t even studied. FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT and watch her FULL episode linked below.👇
6:28

‼️Candace REACTS To The MOST Viral Moment Of The Debate — Andrew Wilson Couldn’t Name a SINGLE Charge Against Tyler Robinson😂 Candace asked a basic question. “Which of the charges do you think Tyler Robinson is guilty of?” Wilson had spent the entire lead-up claiming the evidence was overwhelming. He had even tweeted about the defense’s latest filing like he was locked in. Candace assumed any serious person showing up to debate Tyler’s guilt would at least know what he was charged with. She was wrong. He couldn’t name one. When pressed, he tried the false bravado (“of course I know them”) and then completely fell apart. Candace had to list all seven charges for him while he sat there sweating. Aggravated murder. Felony discharge of a firearm. Two counts of obstruction of justice. Two counts of witness tampering. Commission of a violent offense in the presence of a minor. This man came to argue that Tyler Robinson is guilty… and did not know guilty of what. That moment said everything. He never watched the preliminary hearing. He never read the filings. He showed up to defend a narrative he hadn’t even studied. FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT and watch her FULL episode linked below.👇

Project Constitution

15,544 views • 1 month ago

Candace: “I have no evidence to support any of my claims that Israel, Erika or TPUSA was involved in Charlie’s death.” Okay. Cool. Then Andrew Wilson won the debate and proved that Candace is a chronic liar. Case closed.
0:36

Candace: “I have no evidence to support any of my claims that Israel, Erika or TPUSA was involved in Charlie’s death.” Okay. Cool. Then Andrew Wilson won the debate and proved that Candace is a chronic liar. Case closed.

Bren

22,008 views • 26 days ago