Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

"It's a bit ridiculous that we are blocking it on this idea that stablecoins should not generate yield for customers" Johann Kerbrat, SVP and GM of International and Crypto at Robinhood, on the stablecoin yield fight holding up the Clarity Act "I think this Clarity Act is really important.... A lot of customers want the FDIC insurance, they want to be able to think that their money is safe, so they're already using their banking accounts. They're not trying to get the highest yield possible, otherwise they would use a feature like the one we launched" "At the end of the day we are penalizing people that want to utilize crypto and blockchain technology, because for stablecoins it's a lot easier to send, a lot easier to transfer 24/7" "It's not really fair that we are penalizing those customers"show more

The Wolf Of All Streets

1,084,494 subscribers

36,490 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

"It's a sign that crypto actually built infrastructure that works. But is it bullish for the projects and tokens involved? I'm not sure it is" Joshua Frank on what Robinhood building on Arbitrum really means for crypto "There's a reason Robinhood is choosing to do this onchain. They can go 24/7, low fee trading for their customers. But Robinhood is operating all the sequencers behind the scenes. It's their chain, they're controlling everything. It's not like Arbitrum is being used for transactions of any sort" "As we saw with Base and Optimism, loyalty is not necessarily a real thing. But obviously they saw something in Arbitrum's technology they liked, so maybe that's bullish broadly for Arbitrum" "The reality is it probably creates more demand for trading tokenized equities 24/7. Maybe dYdX or other platforms offering that are able to generate fees back to token holders. A few years ago the crypto market would have reacted and ARB would have been up 70% on the day. But this is just a picks and shovels kind of play"

"It's a sign that crypto actually built infrastructure that works. But is it bullish for the projects and tokens involved? I'm not sure it is" Joshua Frank on what Robinhood building on Arbitrum really means for crypto "There's a reason Robinhood is choosing to do this onchain. They can go 24/7, low fee trading for their customers. But Robinhood is operating all the sequencers behind the scenes. It's their chain, they're controlling everything. It's not like Arbitrum is being used for transactions of any sort" "As we saw with Base and Optimism, loyalty is not necessarily a real thing. But obviously they saw something in Arbitrum's technology they liked, so maybe that's bullish broadly for Arbitrum" "The reality is it probably creates more demand for trading tokenized equities 24/7. Maybe dYdX or other platforms offering that are able to generate fees back to token holders. A few years ago the crypto market would have reacted and ARB would have been up 70% on the day. But this is just a picks and shovels kind of play"

The Wolf Of All Streets

31,562 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

WATCH: "For the crypto community to say we don't want any bill unless we can get yield out of stablecoins — I don't think it's the hill to die on." Ric Edelman breaks down why he thinks banks are likely to win the stablecoin debate.

WATCH: "For the crypto community to say we don't want any bill unless we can get yield out of stablecoins — I don't think it's the hill to die on." Ric Edelman breaks down why he thinks banks are likely to win the stablecoin debate.

CoinDesk

35,062 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

VP VANCE: "We want Europe to thrive, and we want Europe to succeed." "The problem that we have with Europe is not that we don't like Europe, even though you hear that from the European press, it's not that we don't respect our allies, it's that they are doing a lot of things to sabotage themselves."

VP VANCE: "We want Europe to thrive, and we want Europe to succeed." "The problem that we have with Europe is not that we don't like Europe, even though you hear that from the European press, it's not that we don't respect our allies, it's that they are doing a lot of things to sabotage themselves."

Fox News

315,592 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Anthony Scaramucci updates CNBC on the current state of the crypto Clarity Act: "If it get's to the (Senate) floor it's gonna pass...cause I think a lot of the younger democrats are not gonna want to go up against the crypto bros and their PACs come November" "If it doesn't get to the floor it dies a brutal death."

Anthony Scaramucci updates CNBC on the current state of the crypto Clarity Act: "If it get's to the (Senate) floor it's gonna pass...cause I think a lot of the younger democrats are not gonna want to go up against the crypto bros and their PACs come November" "If it doesn't get to the floor it dies a brutal death."

Altcoin Daily

78,150 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Pep Guardiola on watching Arsenal’s style: “Yeah [I like watching Arsenal]…” Reporter: “What is it you like about them because they get a lot of criticism for their style?” Guardiola: “Yeah, people are so demanding. So demanding for the media, for the supporters, for everyone. I enjoy watching it. I learn a lot, many, many, many things. And the people, what they want, the people they want is win. “We fight in an aspect that is really, really, really important that we cannot fight against. It's 22 years without winning the Premier League. So with that aspect, we cannot fight. So they have something that makes it unique. “I know that I knew that feeling when we arrived here and for a long time we didn't win the Premier League, or a long time not because with Manuel and Mancini they did it, but for our era I would say one at a time, but in the first I know how you feel it, and that is something that we cannot play against, so that's why we had to focus on the way we had to play.”

Pep Guardiola on watching Arsenal’s style: “Yeah [I like watching Arsenal]…” Reporter: “What is it you like about them because they get a lot of criticism for their style?” Guardiola: “Yeah, people are so demanding. So demanding for the media, for the supporters, for everyone. I enjoy watching it. I learn a lot, many, many, many things. And the people, what they want, the people they want is win. “We fight in an aspect that is really, really, really important that we cannot fight against. It's 22 years without winning the Premier League. So with that aspect, we cannot fight. So they have something that makes it unique. “I know that I knew that feeling when we arrived here and for a long time we didn't win the Premier League, or a long time not because with Manuel and Mancini they did it, but for our era I would say one at a time, but in the first I know how you feel it, and that is something that we cannot play against, so that's why we had to focus on the way we had to play.”

Connor Humm

241,805 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Today, I want to make it clear to everyone that we are moving away from our current description as a “stablecoin app”. We are not building a stablecoin app, we are not building the next big neobank or crypto neobank, it's not a money app, not a crypto exchange, not a global Venmo, not the on-chain Robinhood, or even not a financial app, NO, none of that. This is not about the tech, the financial rails, or a financial category. This is my life's work. And my commitment, our commitment, is to build the opportunity app. UGLYCASH the opportunity app

Today, I want to make it clear to everyone that we are moving away from our current description as a “stablecoin app”. We are not building a stablecoin app, we are not building the next big neobank or crypto neobank, it's not a money app, not a crypto exchange, not a global Venmo, not the on-chain Robinhood, or even not a financial app, NO, none of that. This is not about the tech, the financial rails, or a financial category. This is my life's work. And my commitment, our commitment, is to build the opportunity app. UGLYCASH the opportunity app

UGLYCASH

16,069 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Today, I want to make it clear to everyone that we are moving away from our current description as a “stablecoin app”. We are not building a stablecoin app, we are not building the next big neobank or crypto neobank, it's not a money app, not a crypto exchange, not a global Venmo, not the on-chain Robinhood, or even not a financial app, NO, none of that. This is not about the tech, the financial rails, or a financial category. This is my life's work. And my commitment, our commitment, is to build the opportunity app. UGLYCASH the opportunity app

Today, I want to make it clear to everyone that we are moving away from our current description as a “stablecoin app”. We are not building a stablecoin app, we are not building the next big neobank or crypto neobank, it's not a money app, not a crypto exchange, not a global Venmo, not the on-chain Robinhood, or even not a financial app, NO, none of that. This is not about the tech, the financial rails, or a financial category. This is my life's work. And my commitment, our commitment, is to build the opportunity app. UGLYCASH the opportunity app

Gabo

57,879 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Tomorrow, we publish a new The Edge Podcast with Robinhood GM of Crypto, Johann Kerbrat. This clip might be the clearest articulation I’ve ever heard on why Ethereum's roadmap is working, and why Robinhood chose to build its own L2 using Arbitrum. + Ethereum offers security, with proven decentralization + New L1s = centralized databases + EVM liquidity is essential for tokenized stocks & RWAs + Arbitrum’s tech stack wins on engineering merit No edits. No spin. Just a major U.S. fintech explaining why they’re building the future of finance on Ethereum. Real validation for those of us who are long term Ethereum/ETH investors. Here is the clip and transcript for Johann answering why Robinhood chose to build its own Ethereum L2: "You see a lot of companies right now building their own L1. And for us, we felt excited about this idea where we can control anything that we want to build and we don't have to deal with any other chain to talk to or anything like that. But at the same time, creating the security of a real proper decentralized chain is extremely difficult, as you know. And we basically get that for free with Ethereum. The network has been going on for a very long time now and the security is stable and it's decentralized. And I think that's really the key two points that we wanted to have. When you look at some of these new L1s that are being created, it's not really decentralized and it's not really secure. So at the end of the day, you're basically having like a... fancy database that is probably a bit slower to use than an actual database. And so we didn't really see the value in that. With Ethereum, we get the security by default. The second thing that we get by having an L2 is that you get all this liquidity that is already part of all the EVM compatible chains. And that was also a very important decision factor for us. If we really want to bring the stock market onto the chain, we need to have this liquidity. It's not going to be possible if it's in a closed loop or in a closed chain that nobody can access and you need to have like 20 different hoops before you can bridge to that chain. So for us, that was kind of the two elements that we really wanted to focus on and that's why we decided on building on Ethereum. And then we decided on Arbitrum mostly because we love the technology. There's a few things that we are excited about. For example, Stylus. It's a way that we can basically use different language into the chain and we can build on top of that. We also like the way that they prioritize transactions that is, we think, a better way than some of the competition. And so basically we'll use the Arbitrum stack and we'll create our own L2, which will make us also compatible with all the Arbitrum chains. And so we think it's kind of the best of all the worlds. But for us, the idea is like we will start with public stock, and then we think that we can tokenize anything really, not just stocks. It can be private stock, it can be art, it can be real estate, whatever you want to think of. And so we really wanted to have a platform that is kind of easy to build on and we can keep adding on it. At the same time, we know that regulation are going to be hard on some of these products, especially when it comes to financial products. You always have different regulators. You have different rules depending on the region. If you're in the EU versus the US versus LATAM. And so we felt like we wanted to have our own layer that we could customize for these needs. And then anyone that is building on the chain will also be able to benefit from what we are building, versus just putting everything in a contract that will be just good for the people that are using the Robinhood contracts. But so at this point, we announced the chain in June. We are in private test right now, and then we'll do more announcements in the future." Subscribe for the full episode tomorrow! ► Newsletter: ► Spotify: ► Apple: ► Youtube: ► Pods:

Tomorrow, we publish a new The Edge Podcast with Robinhood GM of Crypto, Johann Kerbrat. This clip might be the clearest articulation I’ve ever heard on why Ethereum's roadmap is working, and why Robinhood chose to build its own L2 using Arbitrum. + Ethereum offers security, with proven decentralization + New L1s = centralized databases + EVM liquidity is essential for tokenized stocks & RWAs + Arbitrum’s tech stack wins on engineering merit No edits. No spin. Just a major U.S. fintech explaining why they’re building the future of finance on Ethereum. Real validation for those of us who are long term Ethereum/ETH investors. Here is the clip and transcript for Johann answering why Robinhood chose to build its own Ethereum L2: "You see a lot of companies right now building their own L1. And for us, we felt excited about this idea where we can control anything that we want to build and we don't have to deal with any other chain to talk to or anything like that. But at the same time, creating the security of a real proper decentralized chain is extremely difficult, as you know. And we basically get that for free with Ethereum. The network has been going on for a very long time now and the security is stable and it's decentralized. And I think that's really the key two points that we wanted to have. When you look at some of these new L1s that are being created, it's not really decentralized and it's not really secure. So at the end of the day, you're basically having like a... fancy database that is probably a bit slower to use than an actual database. And so we didn't really see the value in that. With Ethereum, we get the security by default. The second thing that we get by having an L2 is that you get all this liquidity that is already part of all the EVM compatible chains. And that was also a very important decision factor for us. If we really want to bring the stock market onto the chain, we need to have this liquidity. It's not going to be possible if it's in a closed loop or in a closed chain that nobody can access and you need to have like 20 different hoops before you can bridge to that chain. So for us, that was kind of the two elements that we really wanted to focus on and that's why we decided on building on Ethereum. And then we decided on Arbitrum mostly because we love the technology. There's a few things that we are excited about. For example, Stylus. It's a way that we can basically use different language into the chain and we can build on top of that. We also like the way that they prioritize transactions that is, we think, a better way than some of the competition. And so basically we'll use the Arbitrum stack and we'll create our own L2, which will make us also compatible with all the Arbitrum chains. And so we think it's kind of the best of all the worlds. But for us, the idea is like we will start with public stock, and then we think that we can tokenize anything really, not just stocks. It can be private stock, it can be art, it can be real estate, whatever you want to think of. And so we really wanted to have a platform that is kind of easy to build on and we can keep adding on it. At the same time, we know that regulation are going to be hard on some of these products, especially when it comes to financial products. You always have different regulators. You have different rules depending on the region. If you're in the EU versus the US versus LATAM. And so we felt like we wanted to have our own layer that we could customize for these needs. And then anyone that is building on the chain will also be able to benefit from what we are building, versus just putting everything in a contract that will be just good for the people that are using the Robinhood contracts. But so at this point, we announced the chain in June. We are in private test right now, and then we'll do more announcements in the future." Subscribe for the full episode tomorrow! ► Newsletter: ► Spotify: ► Apple: ► Youtube: ► Pods:

DeFi Dad ⟠ defidad.eth

62,600 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

"These 140 companies are effectively making a bet that the Clarity Act does not pass" "The way this is structured, all that revenue going to the issuer, Tether or Circle, will go to the companies utilizing it as they use it. That make all your money on the float model is what they're trying to kill" "The Genius Act codified into law that the issuers aren't allowed to pass on yield to customers. But once it leaves the issuer and goes to someone like Coinbase, they can right now do rewards and pass that on. That's where the banks are freaking out. Jamie Dimon and all of them think that same thing should be banned" "So 140 companies are taking advantage of what many see as a loophole. If the Clarity Act passes with the current language, that prohibition gets extended to Coinbase and all the third parties beyond the issuer. I was at 5% chance Clarity Act passes. These 140 companies that probably know more than me are clearly making a much more compelling bet"

"These 140 companies are effectively making a bet that the Clarity Act does not pass" "The way this is structured, all that revenue going to the issuer, Tether or Circle, will go to the companies utilizing it as they use it. That make all your money on the float model is what they're trying to kill" "The Genius Act codified into law that the issuers aren't allowed to pass on yield to customers. But once it leaves the issuer and goes to someone like Coinbase, they can right now do rewards and pass that on. That's where the banks are freaking out. Jamie Dimon and all of them think that same thing should be banned" "So 140 companies are taking advantage of what many see as a loophole. If the Clarity Act passes with the current language, that prohibition gets extended to Coinbase and all the third parties beyond the issuer. I was at 5% chance Clarity Act passes. These 140 companies that probably know more than me are clearly making a much more compelling bet"

The Wolf Of All Streets

87,755 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Why Republican senators who backed the Clarity Act are now opposing it "Not only did Polymarket and Kalshi all jump into the 20% chance the Clarity Act passes, but if you look at what's being said, I'd say the odds have actually decreased, even though this first vote is being proposed. Why? You have seven Republican senators, three or four outright, and a few listed by the Blockchain Association and others, now saying it's safe to poke their heads out and oppose the Clarity Act" "All these Republicans, a bunch that were supposed to be voting for it, have come out saying I don't really like that this doesn't protect community banks, and there's going to be deposit flight. All the old narratives we were seeing from Jamie Dimon and JP Morgan" "Now that they realize this thing is unlikely to pass, they're like, we need to go earn that bank lobby money we've been collecting, and stick our heads out and say we oppose this. Not because of the ethics or the new things, back to the old stablecoin yield argument"

Why Republican senators who backed the Clarity Act are now opposing it "Not only did Polymarket and Kalshi all jump into the 20% chance the Clarity Act passes, but if you look at what's being said, I'd say the odds have actually decreased, even though this first vote is being proposed. Why? You have seven Republican senators, three or four outright, and a few listed by the Blockchain Association and others, now saying it's safe to poke their heads out and oppose the Clarity Act" "All these Republicans, a bunch that were supposed to be voting for it, have come out saying I don't really like that this doesn't protect community banks, and there's going to be deposit flight. All the old narratives we were seeing from Jamie Dimon and JP Morgan" "Now that they realize this thing is unlikely to pass, they're like, we need to go earn that bank lobby money we've been collecting, and stick our heads out and say we oppose this. Not because of the ethics or the new things, back to the old stablecoin yield argument"

The Wolf Of All Streets

40,608 Aufrufe • vor 15 Tagen

Cooper Flagg on the fan energy now compared to earlier in the season: “I think we have not given the fans a lot to love. So I think that it’s part of it, and I think we take a lot of responsibility on that and having lost the fans a little bit. And I think had we given them a lot more to cheer for and be up in the fourth quarters and be into it and giving them more wins, I think we might look at it a little differently, so, I think we can take a lot of responsibility for that, but the fans have been there, they stepped up tonight. They were huge, they were loud, they were positive, so I just want to look forward and try to continue to give them things to be positive for…I’m just glad they show up for us.”

Cooper Flagg on the fan energy now compared to earlier in the season: “I think we have not given the fans a lot to love. So I think that it’s part of it, and I think we take a lot of responsibility on that and having lost the fans a little bit. And I think had we given them a lot more to cheer for and be up in the fourth quarters and be into it and giving them more wins, I think we might look at it a little differently, so, I think we can take a lot of responsibility for that, but the fans have been there, they stepped up tonight. They were huge, they were loud, they were positive, so I just want to look forward and try to continue to give them things to be positive for…I’m just glad they show up for us.”

Noah Weber

67,240 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Should Christian Nationalism and Catholic Integralism be taken seriously? Ben Sasse answers. “‘Should they be taken seriously?’ I mean, ultimately I think no — but I want to be humble about how and why we get there.” “Can people who are skeptical of a lot of Enlightenment assumptions be reasonable in making those cases? Of course. I'm pretty sympathetic to a lot of what the Enlightenment offered us in response to many of the things that had just come before. But that doesn't mean that the Enlightenment is at all a foretaste of heaven.” “I think there is a temptation right now to have an over-realized eschatology where people want to find a city that has foundations. ‘Right now, dang it, I'm ready to build it and I want it to be better and I want it now. And I want to smash the people who are in the way of it’ is tonally the way a lot of these folks talk.” “But philosophically, having a debate is one thing and claiming that they're doing practical politics is quite another. So I think it is important, without us, you know, trying to answer a lot of these questions, to at least acknowledge there are Catholic claims about integralism that a lot of Protestants seem to pine for and lust after without working through — what would that really mean?” “I just look at a lot of the debates of the last two months about women's suffrage and I just kind of want to shake my head and say, ‘Man, this is a weirdo online phenomenon.’ There is no chance on earth that any of these folks who are advancing some sub-varieties of Christian nationalism are actually thinking there's math by which they're going to end women's suffrage. And yet they talk like it. Because online, it seems really provocative to say things like that. And I don't really know what it's worth to linger on some of these silly online debates.” Watch: Listen:

Should Christian Nationalism and Catholic Integralism be taken seriously? Ben Sasse answers. “‘Should they be taken seriously?’ I mean, ultimately I think no — but I want to be humble about how and why we get there.” “Can people who are skeptical of a lot of Enlightenment assumptions be reasonable in making those cases? Of course. I'm pretty sympathetic to a lot of what the Enlightenment offered us in response to many of the things that had just come before. But that doesn't mean that the Enlightenment is at all a foretaste of heaven.” “I think there is a temptation right now to have an over-realized eschatology where people want to find a city that has foundations. ‘Right now, dang it, I'm ready to build it and I want it to be better and I want it now. And I want to smash the people who are in the way of it’ is tonally the way a lot of these folks talk.” “But philosophically, having a debate is one thing and claiming that they're doing practical politics is quite another. So I think it is important, without us, you know, trying to answer a lot of these questions, to at least acknowledge there are Catholic claims about integralism that a lot of Protestants seem to pine for and lust after without working through — what would that really mean?” “I just look at a lot of the debates of the last two months about women's suffrage and I just kind of want to shake my head and say, ‘Man, this is a weirdo online phenomenon.’ There is no chance on earth that any of these folks who are advancing some sub-varieties of Christian nationalism are actually thinking there's math by which they're going to end women's suffrage. And yet they talk like it. Because online, it seems really provocative to say things like that. And I don't really know what it's worth to linger on some of these silly online debates.” Watch: Listen:

Sola Media

39,084 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Full interview by Yuki Ishikawa for tbs before leaving for the Philippines: (His words 🥹) "I think we're a team that gets a lot of support, so I hope we can use that support to achieve good results. "I think we are a team that gets a lot of support, so I hope we can use this support to get good results. I think there will be a lot of people there; we'll be in the Philippines, so the atmosphere will be in our favor. I'm not particularly worried about that. We had a very disappointing result in the VNL, and if we manage to advance well in this WCH, we'll face Poland in the quarterfinals. I think it's another big challenge, but first we want to win one game at a time in the qualifiers. Of course, our goal is to reach the podium, but first, we have to compete in the qualifiers, so I think the first match is the most important, so I want to be especially aware of that." fighting 💪🏻

Full interview by Yuki Ishikawa for tbs before leaving for the Philippines: (His words 🥹) "I think we're a team that gets a lot of support, so I hope we can use that support to achieve good results. "I think we are a team that gets a lot of support, so I hope we can use this support to get good results. I think there will be a lot of people there; we'll be in the Philippines, so the atmosphere will be in our favor. I'm not particularly worried about that. We had a very disappointing result in the VNL, and if we manage to advance well in this WCH, we'll face Poland in the quarterfinals. I think it's another big challenge, but first we want to win one game at a time in the qualifiers. Of course, our goal is to reach the podium, but first, we have to compete in the qualifiers, so I think the first match is the most important, so I want to be especially aware of that." fighting 💪🏻

joey, and flower 🌼

94,088 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

AOC: But there are a lot of folks who talk about change in leadership that don't necessarily articulate what their direction is. And so I would say that it's important we talk pretty specifically about the kind of changes that we want, because there are a lot of people in this country, and there are a lot of forces and lobbyists that want the Democratic party to become even more pro-corporate than it is. And so when I talk about change, I talk about orienting the Democratic party to be unabashedly working class and to orient itself around working class Americans

AOC: But there are a lot of folks who talk about change in leadership that don't necessarily articulate what their direction is. And so I would say that it's important we talk pretty specifically about the kind of changes that we want, because there are a lot of people in this country, and there are a lot of forces and lobbyists that want the Democratic party to become even more pro-corporate than it is. And so when I talk about change, I talk about orienting the Democratic party to be unabashedly working class and to orient itself around working class Americans

Acyn

46,493 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

THE CLARITY ACT IS THE ROADMAP EVERYONE IS WAITING ON "Everyone needs the clarity of the Clarity Act. Once you get it, it's the green light. They're all waiting for what exactly is. Which things are securities, which are not, how does it all work?" Raoul Pal explains that the CLARITY Act is the green light that banks and TradFi are waiting for to jump into crypto. Once the Clarity Act is passed, all of the banks will start building out their crypto rails for everything.

THE CLARITY ACT IS THE ROADMAP EVERYONE IS WAITING ON "Everyone needs the clarity of the Clarity Act. Once you get it, it's the green light. They're all waiting for what exactly is. Which things are securities, which are not, how does it all work?" Raoul Pal explains that the CLARITY Act is the green light that banks and TradFi are waiting for to jump into crypto. Once the Clarity Act is passed, all of the banks will start building out their crypto rails for everything.

CryptosRus

63,920 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Asmongold explains why men are joining the DSA "A lot of men probably want to have a job and take care of themselves, and many of these guys go to college, they're educated in something, and they're not able to get any employment." "Because of that, they want to undo the system that has created the environment that makes them unsuccessful. They view something like the DSA as the solution." "Those guys aren't totally wrong. They're not wrong with their problem. They're wrong with their solution. I don't agree with the solution, but I agree that it's a problem."

Asmongold explains why men are joining the DSA "A lot of men probably want to have a job and take care of themselves, and many of these guys go to college, they're educated in something, and they're not able to get any employment." "Because of that, they want to undo the system that has created the environment that makes them unsuccessful. They view something like the DSA as the solution." "Those guys aren't totally wrong. They're not wrong with their problem. They're wrong with their solution. I don't agree with the solution, but I agree that it's a problem."

Asmongold Updates

44,751 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Andrej Karpathy called the current AI models as "slop" "I do think that overall the models are not there yet. I feel like the industry is making too big of a jump and trying to pretend that this is amazing, but it's not. It's slop, and I think they are not coming to terms with it. Maybe they are trying to fundraise or something like that, I'm not sure what's going on. We are at this intermediate stage. The models are amazing, but they still need a lot of work for now. Autocomplete is my sweet spot." --- On the latest Dwarkesh Patel podcast.

Andrej Karpathy called the current AI models as "slop" "I do think that overall the models are not there yet. I feel like the industry is making too big of a jump and trying to pretend that this is amazing, but it's not. It's slop, and I think they are not coming to terms with it. Maybe they are trying to fundraise or something like that, I'm not sure what's going on. We are at this intermediate stage. The models are amazing, but they still need a lot of work for now. Autocomplete is my sweet spot." --- On the latest Dwarkesh Patel podcast.

Rohan Paul

33,331 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

This is what leadership looks like. President Trump flanked by Zelenskyy: “I learned a lot, but I think I haven't changed from the standpoint that we both want to see this end and we both want to see a fair deal made. It's got to be fair and I think that will happen ... This is a war that should have never happened.”

This is what leadership looks like. President Trump flanked by Zelenskyy: “I learned a lot, but I think I haven't changed from the standpoint that we both want to see this end and we both want to see a fair deal made. It's got to be fair and I think that will happen ... This is a war that should have never happened.”

Charlie Kirk

6,831,529 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr