Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

It's actually happening 🤯 Tomorrow we're doing the FIRST hacker residency livestream!! 📅 Tuesday, November 4th 11AM (UTC) 📍 Here on X (live from Da Nang 🇻🇳) 10 founders. 500k+ followers. $1M+ MRR. What's the worst that could happen, right?

Rob Hallam

48,915 subscribers

25,321 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Wissenschaft & Technologie

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Dr. Arthur Brooks' simple 60-second trick to kill anxiety "Anxiety is unfocused fear. Write down: 1. The #1 thing I'm actually afraid of right now 2. Why it's happening 3. What's the worst that could happen 4. What would I do if it did?" This moves the fear from your emotional brain (amygdala) to your logical brain (prefrontal cortex). It greatly reduces the anxiety—and can change your life. Try it next time anxiety hits. 0:50 clip inside—fast, powerful tool.

Dr. Arthur Brooks' simple 60-second trick to kill anxiety "Anxiety is unfocused fear. Write down: 1. The #1 thing I'm actually afraid of right now 2. Why it's happening 3. What's the worst that could happen 4. What would I do if it did?" This moves the fear from your emotional brain (amygdala) to your logical brain (prefrontal cortex). It greatly reduces the anxiety—and can change your life. Try it next time anxiety hits. 0:50 clip inside—fast, powerful tool.

Camus

41,433 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Susanna Reid, "What do you mean this is so typical? Being asked questions and asked to answer them?" Nigel Farage, "Well well well what's happening here is we're coming along as the third biggest party and we want to have an open debate and we're getting stuck here on one narrow point" Ed Balls, "It's not the biggest tax cut proposal" NIgel Farage, "Why don't we talk about our energy policy" Ed Balls, "Why don't we talk about. your inheritance tax proposal? Your proposal to raise the threshold hold from £1m to £2m is a big tax giveaway only if your house is worth over £1m. Is that really your first priority?" Nigel Farage, "If you earned money, paid tax on it, bought a house, you shouldn't pay tax again. Your children shouldn't be taxed again" Ed Balls, "That's true for everybody unless your house is worth over £1m. Why are you prioritising people whose house is worth over £1m? You could spend the money raised on low-medium income people. Instead you've got a massive tax cut, only if your house is wroth over £1m. What's fair about that?" Nigel Farage, "I don't believe in double taxation"

Susanna Reid, "What do you mean this is so typical? Being asked questions and asked to answer them?" Nigel Farage, "Well well well what's happening here is we're coming along as the third biggest party and we want to have an open debate and we're getting stuck here on one narrow point" Ed Balls, "It's not the biggest tax cut proposal" NIgel Farage, "Why don't we talk about our energy policy" Ed Balls, "Why don't we talk about. your inheritance tax proposal? Your proposal to raise the threshold hold from £1m to £2m is a big tax giveaway only if your house is worth over £1m. Is that really your first priority?" Nigel Farage, "If you earned money, paid tax on it, bought a house, you shouldn't pay tax again. Your children shouldn't be taxed again" Ed Balls, "That's true for everybody unless your house is worth over £1m. Why are you prioritising people whose house is worth over £1m? You could spend the money raised on low-medium income people. Instead you've got a massive tax cut, only if your house is wroth over £1m. What's fair about that?" Nigel Farage, "I don't believe in double taxation"

Farrukh

1,578,796 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Renowned investor and philanthropist Mohnish Pabrai on the single worst reason to start a company: "When we embark on a startup, we should never do a startup to make money. It's the worst reason to start a company." It's a bold claim, especially in a world where valuations, funding rounds, and exit strategies dominate the startup conversation. So if money shouldn't be the goal, what should be? "The purpose of business is not to make money. The purpose of business is to deliver an incredible product or service to humanity." The distinction matters. Founders who chase profit first tend to optimise for the wrong things, while founders who chase genuine value creation tend to build something people actually want. And when you get that right, the financial reward takes care of itself: "If you do that, the money is a side effect. It'll happen. We don't need to focus on it." Mohnish Pabrai leaves aspiring founders with one essential question to ask themselves before starting anything: "Do we have a product or a service that we are thinking about that we could bring into this world that is going to improve the world in some way?" That's the filter. Not "can this make money?" but "can this make a difference?"

Renowned investor and philanthropist Mohnish Pabrai on the single worst reason to start a company: "When we embark on a startup, we should never do a startup to make money. It's the worst reason to start a company." It's a bold claim, especially in a world where valuations, funding rounds, and exit strategies dominate the startup conversation. So if money shouldn't be the goal, what should be? "The purpose of business is not to make money. The purpose of business is to deliver an incredible product or service to humanity." The distinction matters. Founders who chase profit first tend to optimise for the wrong things, while founders who chase genuine value creation tend to build something people actually want. And when you get that right, the financial reward takes care of itself: "If you do that, the money is a side effect. It'll happen. We don't need to focus on it." Mohnish Pabrai leaves aspiring founders with one essential question to ask themselves before starting anything: "Do we have a product or a service that we are thinking about that we could bring into this world that is going to improve the world in some way?" That's the filter. Not "can this make money?" but "can this make a difference?"

Big Brain Business

29,106 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

$BTC STILL UNDER THE FVG ZONE That drop you've been watching the last two days is nothing This isn't the next leg down We haven't even tagged the FVG yet I called this exact move days ago, right off the bounce from $59k Now CT is already screaming about a crash No, that's not what's happening here Just like before, price needs to correct back up into the FVG zone first Back then that level was $82k Now it's $69k Don't get shaken out by a sentiment flip that doesn't change the structure I called the $BTC crash from $126k before it happened - publicly, on this page Every local move since then - mapped out here too The next update is the most important one this cycle - we're approaching the level where the real bottom forms Follow now to not miss the update - turn on notifications to see it first

$BTC STILL UNDER THE FVG ZONE That drop you've been watching the last two days is nothing This isn't the next leg down We haven't even tagged the FVG yet I called this exact move days ago, right off the bounce from $59k Now CT is already screaming about a crash No, that's not what's happening here Just like before, price needs to correct back up into the FVG zone first Back then that level was $82k Now it's $69k Don't get shaken out by a sentiment flip that doesn't change the structure I called the $BTC crash from $126k before it happened - publicly, on this page Every local move since then - mapped out here too The next update is the most important one this cycle - we're approaching the level where the real bottom forms Follow now to not miss the update - turn on notifications to see it first

bee🐝

12,387 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

The Washington Post’s Cleve Wootson: “One more, Elon Musk is slated to interview [Donald J. Trump] tomorrow — tonight on — on X. I don't know if the president is going to — feel free to say if he is or not — but I — I think that misinformation on Twitter is not just a campaign issue. It's a — you know, it's an America issue. What role does the White House or the President have any sort of stopping that or stopping the spread of that or sort of inter — intervening in that. Some of that was about campaign misinformation, but you know it's a wider thing, right?” KJP: “Yeah, no, I mean, you've heard us talk about this many times from here about the responsibilities that social media platforms have when it comes to misinformation, disinformation. I don't have anything to read out from here about specific ways that we're working on it, but we believe that that they have the responsibility. These are private companies, so we're also mindful of that too, but look — it is — I think it is incredibly important to call that out as you're — you're doing. I just don't have any specifics on what we have been doing internally as it relates to the interviews, not something that I'm tracking, and I'm sure the President's not tracking it either.”

The Washington Post’s Cleve Wootson: “One more, Elon Musk is slated to interview [Donald J. Trump] tomorrow — tonight on — on X. I don't know if the president is going to — feel free to say if he is or not — but I — I think that misinformation on Twitter is not just a campaign issue. It's a — you know, it's an America issue. What role does the White House or the President have any sort of stopping that or stopping the spread of that or sort of inter — intervening in that. Some of that was about campaign misinformation, but you know it's a wider thing, right?” KJP: “Yeah, no, I mean, you've heard us talk about this many times from here about the responsibilities that social media platforms have when it comes to misinformation, disinformation. I don't have anything to read out from here about specific ways that we're working on it, but we believe that that they have the responsibility. These are private companies, so we're also mindful of that too, but look — it is — I think it is incredibly important to call that out as you're — you're doing. I just don't have any specifics on what we have been doing internally as it relates to the interviews, not something that I'm tracking, and I'm sure the President's not tracking it either.”

Curtis Houck

2,664,564 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

"You have such wonky data right now, it's just too uncertain to know what this means for rates. If things stay this course, inflation comes in hot next month" Ryan Rasmussen, Head of Research at Bitwise, on why the Fed can't read this economy right now "What's tough right now is you have such wonky data, because there's so much uncertainty around what's happening with oil prices and the knock-on effects to the supply chain. You get a read like this which is lower than estimates, but last month inflation came in hot. Month to month there's just a lot of uncertainty around where we're actually headed" "That makes it difficult for Warsh and the other members of the Fed to really have an idea of what the new normal is. Are we at war with Iran or not? Is the Strait open or closed? What does that do to prices, the supply chain, and other inputs that make things more or less expensive?" "There was clearly a mandate from President Trump when he nominated Warsh that he wanted rates cut, a lot of that ahead of the US midterms so Republicans could tout that they've brought down the cost of living. But that's not happening, over the long term we're still running a bit hot. It's good to have this lower print, but with the escalation in the Middle East, I'd guess inflation comes in hot next month"

"You have such wonky data right now, it's just too uncertain to know what this means for rates. If things stay this course, inflation comes in hot next month" Ryan Rasmussen, Head of Research at Bitwise, on why the Fed can't read this economy right now "What's tough right now is you have such wonky data, because there's so much uncertainty around what's happening with oil prices and the knock-on effects to the supply chain. You get a read like this which is lower than estimates, but last month inflation came in hot. Month to month there's just a lot of uncertainty around where we're actually headed" "That makes it difficult for Warsh and the other members of the Fed to really have an idea of what the new normal is. Are we at war with Iran or not? Is the Strait open or closed? What does that do to prices, the supply chain, and other inputs that make things more or less expensive?" "There was clearly a mandate from President Trump when he nominated Warsh that he wanted rates cut, a lot of that ahead of the US midterms so Republicans could tout that they've brought down the cost of living. But that's not happening, over the long term we're still running a bit hot. It's good to have this lower print, but with the escalation in the Middle East, I'd guess inflation comes in hot next month"

The Wolf Of All Streets

29,523 Aufrufe • vor 29 Tagen

MIND BLOWN 💥 🤯 “You wanna know what I just realized about all the legislation that's being passed. Literally, all of it is to stop a revolution” - “We got the 702 bill, which allows them to go through our text messages and make sure we're not colluding with foreign adversaries, but they're also looking for words like revolution - We have the Bill (S.3589 - Preventing Private Paramilitary Activity Act of 2024) that stops us if there's more than a million people talking about one topic or assembling. It's illegal, which isn't even the right term because they're passing statutes and regulations. They're not passing laws. - Banning TikTok because TikTok is our only access to uncensored information. We get to see people on the f*cking ground where the shit is happening, telling us what's actually happening. So the story that they spinning doesn't work anymore. Nobody's going to the news outlets. Nobody's looking at the newspaper because we all see that it's propaganda now. Do you know what that tells me? That either we're about to find out something that they have been doing that directly affects us, which is literally every f*cking thing that they've been doing. Or they're about to do something so drastic that it's gonna cause for us to uprise. Now it could have something to do with that guy burning himself alive in front of the Trump, um, trial in New York. He was basically saying they're running a Ponzi scheme allegedly using Bitcoin. So you're putting your money into Bitcoin. They're going on the back end and taking your money out. So eventually, Bitcoin, cryptocurrency is gonna crash because there's no money in it. Now that doesn't surprise me because they are doing the same thing with our retirement plans, with our 401ks, and the trust funds that half of us don't know that we got. - They're worried about a million of us standing up. What could they possibly be doing? Drop your thoughts in the comments.”

MIND BLOWN 💥 🤯 “You wanna know what I just realized about all the legislation that's being passed. Literally, all of it is to stop a revolution” - “We got the 702 bill, which allows them to go through our text messages and make sure we're not colluding with foreign adversaries, but they're also looking for words like revolution - We have the Bill (S.3589 - Preventing Private Paramilitary Activity Act of 2024) that stops us if there's more than a million people talking about one topic or assembling. It's illegal, which isn't even the right term because they're passing statutes and regulations. They're not passing laws. - Banning TikTok because TikTok is our only access to uncensored information. We get to see people on the fcking ground where the shit is happening, telling us what's actually happening. So the story that they spinning doesn't work anymore. Nobody's going to the news outlets. Nobody's looking at the newspaper because we all see that it's propaganda now. Do you know what that tells me? That either we're about to find out something that they have been doing that directly affects us, which is literally every fcking thing that they've been doing. Or they're about to do something so drastic that it's gonna cause for us to uprise. Now it could have something to do with that guy burning himself alive in front of the Trump, um, trial in New York. He was basically saying they're running a Ponzi scheme allegedly using Bitcoin. So you're putting your money into Bitcoin. They're going on the back end and taking your money out. So eventually, Bitcoin, cryptocurrency is gonna crash because there's no money in it. Now that doesn't surprise me because they are doing the same thing with our retirement plans, with our 401ks, and the trust funds that half of us don't know that we got. - They're worried about a million of us standing up. What could they possibly be doing? Drop your thoughts in the comments.”

Wall Street Apes

1,951,948 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Marc Andreessen: AI is an "80 year overnight success." "Something about AI causes the people in the field to become both excessively utopian and excessively apocalyptic." "What's actually happened is—in retrospect, an enormous amount of technical progress built up over time." "For example, we now know that the neural network is the correct architecture. There was a 60 or 70 year run where that was controversial." "Everything we're building on today sort of derives from the original idea in 1943. In retrospect, we now know that these guys were right." "They would get the timing wrong and they thought capabilities would arrive faster, or that they could be turned into businesses sooner, but the scientists who worked on this over the course of decades were fundamentally correct about what they were doing." "And the payoff from all their work is happening now." "ChatGPT hits, and then o1 hits, and then OpenClaw hits, and these are radical, overnight transformative successes—but they're drawing on an 80 year wellspring backlog of ideas and thinking. It's not just all brand new, it's that it's an unlock of all of these decades of very serious, hardcore research." "There were AI researchers who spent their entire lives—got their PhD, researched for 40 years, retired in a lot of cases, passed away, and they never actually saw it work." Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸 with Latent.Space

a16z

48,205 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Alex Golesh said this in his first press conference as new head football coach at Auburn: " What you're gonna get from me, from our staff, and as we get rolling, our players is the hardest working, toughest grittiest program in the entire country. We're gonna work day in, day out. We're gonna find wins in every single margin we could find. We're gonna build a process driven program, a process driven program where we wake up and we worry about winning every single aspect of our lives every single day. I truly believe that if you buy into a process. A way of doing things day in, day out from the moment you wake up. To how you come in. To how you attack your relationships in a building. To how you attack the weight room, sports, medicine, nutrition, the film room, the teaching, and then certainly the work on the field. If you buy into eating right, sleeping right, hydrating right. Outworking people in the things that nobody else sees. The end result will happen a lot of the time. You don't control the end result. You control your daily habits, you control your daily process. And if you keep pouring into that day in, day out, day in, day out, us as a staff, the student athletes, everybody that touches our guys, at whatever point, the process will pay you back. We're also gonna have a hell of a lot of fun doing it. We're gonna be explosive on offense. We're gonna play really fast. We're gonna challenge teams in every imaginable way. We're gonna run the fricking ball. People around here like running the football, and I can respect it.

Alex Golesh said this in his first press conference as new head football coach at Auburn: " What you're gonna get from me, from our staff, and as we get rolling, our players is the hardest working, toughest grittiest program in the entire country. We're gonna work day in, day out. We're gonna find wins in every single margin we could find. We're gonna build a process driven program, a process driven program where we wake up and we worry about winning every single aspect of our lives every single day. I truly believe that if you buy into a process. A way of doing things day in, day out from the moment you wake up. To how you come in. To how you attack your relationships in a building. To how you attack the weight room, sports, medicine, nutrition, the film room, the teaching, and then certainly the work on the field. If you buy into eating right, sleeping right, hydrating right. Outworking people in the things that nobody else sees. The end result will happen a lot of the time. You don't control the end result. You control your daily habits, you control your daily process. And if you keep pouring into that day in, day out, day in, day out, us as a staff, the student athletes, everybody that touches our guys, at whatever point, the process will pay you back. We're also gonna have a hell of a lot of fun doing it. We're gonna be explosive on offense. We're gonna play really fast. We're gonna challenge teams in every imaginable way. We're gonna run the fricking ball. People around here like running the football, and I can respect it.

Thad Wells

649,383 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

This right here from Jason Rantz on Seattle Red is a perfect distilling of what's happening in Minneapolis: "I think what you have here are organized activists in large part, who are creating this kind of turmoil. You have local leaders who are choosing not to ratchet down any of the rhetoric. Yeah, local." "I think that, when you have the governor saying it's an occupation, that is clearly a problem." "I see activists who showed up with chants" "When you've got people who are showing up with the intent to do damage" "You don't think they're showing up b/c they want to do damage?" "No, actually, what they're doing tonight is protesting because someone was arrested and then attacked an ICE agent. And then, I mean -- does that not count?"

This right here from Jason Rantz on Seattle Red is a perfect distilling of what's happening in Minneapolis: "I think what you have here are organized activists in large part, who are creating this kind of turmoil. You have local leaders who are choosing not to ratchet down any of the rhetoric. Yeah, local." "I think that, when you have the governor saying it's an occupation, that is clearly a problem." "I see activists who showed up with chants" "When you've got people who are showing up with the intent to do damage" "You don't think they're showing up b/c they want to do damage?" "No, actually, what they're doing tonight is protesting because someone was arrested and then attacked an ICE agent. And then, I mean -- does that not count?"

Curtis Houck

15,713 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

"I would love if it was that simplistic. Oh, it's NATO versus BRICS. NATO are bad, so BRICS are good. Yay! Let's support the BRICS. They'll win this fight in the end, and then we'll all live in harmony. I'd like to believe that. I mean, it would be nice if it were true, but it is not true. Demonstrably not true. I've talked about this over and over and over in many different contexts. I've talked about the...BRICS phony opposition...how all of the key positions in things like the New Development Bank and other institutions, BRICS counter institutions to the US, NATO-led institutions like the World Bank, etc...it turns out that they're all populated by the same people who are serving on...over here, and then they serve over here, and they're serving the same agenda. Everything you look at, it turns out it's actually the same thing underneath. On New World next week, last week, me and James Evan Pilato were talking about the digital IDs that the UK is rolling out and that is happening, of course, everywhere else in the world right now. And as I pointed out, well, guess what? Russia just unveiling their digital ID through the Max app or something like that. Anyway, it's the exact same thing. And again, if what we are fighting against is this technocratic top-down control, how on earth is China going to save us from that? That is the paradigm. That is the paragon of technocratic top-down control and surveillance of society. That is what it is predicated on. So they're not going to save you from that agenda. They are that agenda. So yeah, no, we're not going to look to these political saviors. We're not going to look to nation states to save us from this. It's going to come from us or it's not going to happen." James Corbett of 🌎🌏 🔗

"I would love if it was that simplistic. Oh, it's NATO versus BRICS. NATO are bad, so BRICS are good. Yay! Let's support the BRICS. They'll win this fight in the end, and then we'll all live in harmony. I'd like to believe that. I mean, it would be nice if it were true, but it is not true. Demonstrably not true. I've talked about this over and over and over in many different contexts. I've talked about the...BRICS phony opposition...how all of the key positions in things like the New Development Bank and other institutions, BRICS counter institutions to the US, NATO-led institutions like the World Bank, etc...it turns out that they're all populated by the same people who are serving on...over here, and then they serve over here, and they're serving the same agenda. Everything you look at, it turns out it's actually the same thing underneath. On New World next week, last week, me and James Evan Pilato were talking about the digital IDs that the UK is rolling out and that is happening, of course, everywhere else in the world right now. And as I pointed out, well, guess what? Russia just unveiling their digital ID through the Max app or something like that. Anyway, it's the exact same thing. And again, if what we are fighting against is this technocratic top-down control, how on earth is China going to save us from that? That is the paradigm. That is the paragon of technocratic top-down control and surveillance of society. That is what it is predicated on. So they're not going to save you from that agenda. They are that agenda. So yeah, no, we're not going to look to these political saviors. We're not going to look to nation states to save us from this. It's going to come from us or it's not going to happen." James Corbett of 🌎🌏 🔗

Geopolitics & Empire

34,070 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

🚨 HOLY CRAP! This legal immigrant from Latin America STUNNED Don Lemon, going off on his supporting of illegal aliens WOMAN: "[Mass deportations] is how you handle the country...myself as an immigrant. It's about doing things the RIGHT WAY...a lot of them say, 'No human is illegal.' But once you enter the wrong way, you break the law." LEMON: "It's not a crime, you're NOT breaking the law - I mean, you ARE breaking the law, but it's not a criminal act..." WOMAN: "Laws are being broken right and people are not being accountable! It starts growing until it gets to a place you can't live or be safe!" "In Mexico they are doing mass deportations using FORCE. NOTHING like here. They aren't pulling you over, 'Let me see if you're legal.' No, they beat you up and question you later!" LEMON: "We're there! That's happening!" WOMAN: "Not even CLOSE...crossing the border illegally is a CRIME. You don't see it that way, but I do." Fascinating. She is right 100%.

🚨 HOLY CRAP! This legal immigrant from Latin America STUNNED Don Lemon, going off on his supporting of illegal aliens WOMAN: "[Mass deportations] is how you handle the country...myself as an immigrant. It's about doing things the RIGHT WAY...a lot of them say, 'No human is illegal.' But once you enter the wrong way, you break the law." LEMON: "It's not a crime, you're NOT breaking the law - I mean, you ARE breaking the law, but it's not a criminal act..." WOMAN: "Laws are being broken right and people are not being accountable! It starts growing until it gets to a place you can't live or be safe!" "In Mexico they are doing mass deportations using FORCE. NOTHING like here. They aren't pulling you over, 'Let me see if you're legal.' No, they beat you up and question you later!" LEMON: "We're there! That's happening!" WOMAN: "Not even CLOSE...crossing the border illegally is a CRIME. You don't see it that way, but I do." Fascinating. She is right 100%.

Eric Daugherty

625,940 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Former Seattle Fox reporter Brandi Kruse admits to President Trump that she is "living proof that you can recover from TDS" and then proceeds to completely destroy the legacy media in the room... "I was told by probably a dozen people not to tell you this. I'm going to tell it to you anyway, because it's relevant to what we're talking about. I'm living proof that you can recover from TDS. I had strong Trump derangement syndrome for probably eight years. This is one of the reasons I recovered from it. And by the way, it's much better to not have TDS. I'm happier. I'm healthier. More successful. I even think I got a little more attractive after I got rid of my Trump derangement syndrome. I'm a reporter in Seattle, and frankly, I could not care any less what any of you have to say about this meeting. Could not care any less. We're not here for you. I'm not here to convince any of you that Antifa is a real thing, because if you have not come to that conclusion by now, you are never going to come to that conclusion, because you don't want to see it. And you're going to go and you're going to say it's a bunch of right-wing conservative influencers who are here spinning a tale. I was one of you. I was a mainstream reporter in Seattle for 10 years. I was a TV reporter on the streets doing my job, and I was still assaulted by Antifa. So it's not about being conservative. It's about people who go there and show what they're doing. And when I saw after all those years that the media wouldn't be honest about what was happening, that Democratic politicians wouldn't be honest about what was happening, I thought, well, gosh, if they're not being honest about that, maybe they're not being honest about President Trump either. And it opened my mind to just looking at things for what they were. And now I find you quite funny, actually. Now I'm much happier about it. But for me, again, I could not care any less the stories that they go to print." BRAVO 👏👏👏

Former Seattle Fox reporter Brandi Kruse admits to President Trump that she is "living proof that you can recover from TDS" and then proceeds to completely destroy the legacy media in the room... "I was told by probably a dozen people not to tell you this. I'm going to tell it to you anyway, because it's relevant to what we're talking about. I'm living proof that you can recover from TDS. I had strong Trump derangement syndrome for probably eight years. This is one of the reasons I recovered from it. And by the way, it's much better to not have TDS. I'm happier. I'm healthier. More successful. I even think I got a little more attractive after I got rid of my Trump derangement syndrome. I'm a reporter in Seattle, and frankly, I could not care any less what any of you have to say about this meeting. Could not care any less. We're not here for you. I'm not here to convince any of you that Antifa is a real thing, because if you have not come to that conclusion by now, you are never going to come to that conclusion, because you don't want to see it. And you're going to go and you're going to say it's a bunch of right-wing conservative influencers who are here spinning a tale. I was one of you. I was a mainstream reporter in Seattle for 10 years. I was a TV reporter on the streets doing my job, and I was still assaulted by Antifa. So it's not about being conservative. It's about people who go there and show what they're doing. And when I saw after all those years that the media wouldn't be honest about what was happening, that Democratic politicians wouldn't be honest about what was happening, I thought, well, gosh, if they're not being honest about that, maybe they're not being honest about President Trump either. And it opened my mind to just looking at things for what they were. And now I find you quite funny, actually. Now I'm much happier about it. But for me, again, I could not care any less the stories that they go to print." BRAVO 👏👏👏

NewsTreason Channel 17

10,441 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Caller: We're doing our taxes and last year we had $316,000 in capital losses. We were told that we could only deduct $3,000 a year on our taxes, but I did the math and that would take 115 years Dave Ramsey: So it sounds like the type of losses that you have is what's causing the write-off—the inability to write them off, because you don't have any income that is of similar sources to the losses. Caller: Right. Dave Ramsey: It sounds like you need short-term income on investments, not long-term capital gains on investments to offset this. What was this from? What's the loss from? Caller: from trading. From doing trades. Dave Ramsey: Jesus. What is your household income? Caller: For last year, it was only, $38,000. This year it's going up. My husband got a new job starting at $50,000 plus. Dave Ramsey: Where did you have $300,000 that you could lose? Caller: We had it in an inherited IRA. I was having problems with my pregnancy, so he started working from home trading because he was doing it and doing well. Dave Ramsey: Here's the problem. If we get too nitcy and nuanced and technical in order to get some benefit from this write-off, but it exposes him to the very beast that just about killed him the first time, I don't like that. So your husband being anywhere near a brokerage account sounds like suicide to me. I don't know in your household how you're going to create gains on investments to offset losses on investments to get the benefit of this that is substantial. I don't know how to do that. What I would do if I were in your shoes... but before I put your family at further risk playing with the same snakes that already bit you, I would just say, "Screw it, forget it, it's just gone."

Caller: We're doing our taxes and last year we had $316,000 in capital losses. We were told that we could only deduct $3,000 a year on our taxes, but I did the math and that would take 115 years Dave Ramsey: So it sounds like the type of losses that you have is what's causing the write-off—the inability to write them off, because you don't have any income that is of similar sources to the losses. Caller: Right. Dave Ramsey: It sounds like you need short-term income on investments, not long-term capital gains on investments to offset this. What was this from? What's the loss from? Caller: from trading. From doing trades. Dave Ramsey: Jesus. What is your household income? Caller: For last year, it was only, $38,000. This year it's going up. My husband got a new job starting at $50,000 plus. Dave Ramsey: Where did you have $300,000 that you could lose? Caller: We had it in an inherited IRA. I was having problems with my pregnancy, so he started working from home trading because he was doing it and doing well. Dave Ramsey: Here's the problem. If we get too nitcy and nuanced and technical in order to get some benefit from this write-off, but it exposes him to the very beast that just about killed him the first time, I don't like that. So your husband being anywhere near a brokerage account sounds like suicide to me. I don't know in your household how you're going to create gains on investments to offset losses on investments to get the benefit of this that is substantial. I don't know how to do that. What I would do if I were in your shoes... but before I put your family at further risk playing with the same snakes that already bit you, I would just say, "Screw it, forget it, it's just gone."

Traeyz ♠️

54,836 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

NEW: Joe Lonsdale with Brian Kilmeade on data center pushback: "We've done a terrible job in the tech world on PR... we're creating massive numbers of jobs. We're going to bring down the cost of health care... we're going to take manufacturing back from China... It's perfectly fair to insist the data center owners pay for their own electricity, their own water, make sure they're lowering the cost of energy... But it's crazy to stop them... Saronic hiring 10,000 people in Texas to build autonomous ships — only possible with AI." Brian Kilmeade: Joe, you've been seeing this battle. Let's start with AI in particular. You saw the booing that happened at commencement addresses with our next generation of innovators. What's going on? Joe Lonsdale: Well, our next generation of innovators are very excited. Our next generation of activists are clearly not very excited. Listen, I think we've done a terrible job in the tech world on the PR on this.... People don't trust Big Tech for good reason, especially from the right. But I don't think we're explaining that we're actually creating massive numbers of jobs. We're going to bring down the cost of health care. We're going to cure diseases. All these good new innovations, the things that have always driven America forward, they're coming from AI and from data centers. So you can't just turn off our innovation world. That would crush the country, and our enemies would love it if we did that. Brian: And if you look at the headlines right now... China could be prepared to overtake us. What are your thoughts about that as their latest model showing that they would erase America's AI lead? Joe: I think our top labs are still 3 to 6 months ahead, but the Kimi model last week was very impressive. Listen, China is both innovating, and they're very good at copying and stealing.... We do not want to slow our slide down because then they will get ahead. And by the way, if we can stay ahead, we're going to take manufacturing back from China. We're going to train people here to be better than their best engineers... Saronic you saw last week hiring 10,000 people in Texas to build autonomous ships. Only possible with AI. We're doing a lot of things that create jobs here, but it's a big fight. We have to win. Brian: That leads me to the data center conversation. So we have all these data centers in this country, and suddenly it's a controversial move. 40% of the new construction are being protested now by various cities. The governor of New York says we're putting a moratorium. No data centers. What's the truth? Are they a danger to the environment? Joe: First of all, they're not a danger to the environment. I do think it's perfectly fair to insist the data center owners pay for their own electricity, pay for their own water, make sure they're lowering the cost of energy... You don't want them raising costs for anyone. But overall, they create jobs, and they're key to this industrial revolution for all of us... It's crazy to stop them. You know who wants us to stop them? Of course, it's the populist extreme far left. But of course, it's also China. And we are also tracking Chinese money helping NGOs to push this narrative. Brian: And you also feel like it's popping up on TikTok and other social media devices. So you've got a bunch of 18 to 25 year olds who think this is their next cause. Joe: You're being taught to hate, just like we were taught so many other things we're supposed to be worried about. And it's fake, and it's B.S., and I'm long America and building the future. Brian: All right, Joe, I always appreciate your optimism. And you're one of the most accomplished Americans we have. We count on you to lead.

NEW: Joe Lonsdale with Brian Kilmeade on data center pushback: "We've done a terrible job in the tech world on PR... we're creating massive numbers of jobs. We're going to bring down the cost of health care... we're going to take manufacturing back from China... It's perfectly fair to insist the data center owners pay for their own electricity, their own water, make sure they're lowering the cost of energy... But it's crazy to stop them... Saronic hiring 10,000 people in Texas to build autonomous ships — only possible with AI." Brian Kilmeade: Joe, you've been seeing this battle. Let's start with AI in particular. You saw the booing that happened at commencement addresses with our next generation of innovators. What's going on? Joe Lonsdale: Well, our next generation of innovators are very excited. Our next generation of activists are clearly not very excited. Listen, I think we've done a terrible job in the tech world on the PR on this.... People don't trust Big Tech for good reason, especially from the right. But I don't think we're explaining that we're actually creating massive numbers of jobs. We're going to bring down the cost of health care. We're going to cure diseases. All these good new innovations, the things that have always driven America forward, they're coming from AI and from data centers. So you can't just turn off our innovation world. That would crush the country, and our enemies would love it if we did that. Brian: And if you look at the headlines right now... China could be prepared to overtake us. What are your thoughts about that as their latest model showing that they would erase America's AI lead? Joe: I think our top labs are still 3 to 6 months ahead, but the Kimi model last week was very impressive. Listen, China is both innovating, and they're very good at copying and stealing.... We do not want to slow our slide down because then they will get ahead. And by the way, if we can stay ahead, we're going to take manufacturing back from China. We're going to train people here to be better than their best engineers... Saronic you saw last week hiring 10,000 people in Texas to build autonomous ships. Only possible with AI. We're doing a lot of things that create jobs here, but it's a big fight. We have to win. Brian: That leads me to the data center conversation. So we have all these data centers in this country, and suddenly it's a controversial move. 40% of the new construction are being protested now by various cities. The governor of New York says we're putting a moratorium. No data centers. What's the truth? Are they a danger to the environment? Joe: First of all, they're not a danger to the environment. I do think it's perfectly fair to insist the data center owners pay for their own electricity, pay for their own water, make sure they're lowering the cost of energy... You don't want them raising costs for anyone. But overall, they create jobs, and they're key to this industrial revolution for all of us... It's crazy to stop them. You know who wants us to stop them? Of course, it's the populist extreme far left. But of course, it's also China. And we are also tracking Chinese money helping NGOs to push this narrative. Brian: And you also feel like it's popping up on TikTok and other social media devices. So you've got a bunch of 18 to 25 year olds who think this is their next cause. Joe: You're being taught to hate, just like we were taught so many other things we're supposed to be worried about. And it's fake, and it's B.S., and I'm long America and building the future. Brian: All right, Joe, I always appreciate your optimism. And you're one of the most accomplished Americans we have. We count on you to lead.

American Optimist

131,533 Aufrufe • vor 22 Tagen

tubatu is forever!🥹 🐱do you think we’ll be able to come camping again? 🧸 maybe…like in 10 years? 🐱more like 20 🧸 20 years? 🐱 up to 10 years, i don't really think things will change all that dynamically 🧸 yeah, that’s true. 🧸 then 20 years from now? 🐱 i think it’ll be pretty similar. 🐱 i think i’ll still be doing tomorrow x together, just in a way that suits the level of stamina i’ll have then 🧸 true 🧸 20 years from now, if we really wanted to, we could definitely come camping. by then we’ll probably have a lot more free time, too. 🐱 that would be nice. 🐱 i hope we can live more relaxed 🐱 not now, though. right now i want to be busy 🐱 we could be even busier. i could do concerts every single day 🧸 i think tomorrow x together will basically be lifelong friends 🐱 yeah 🧸 it feels like i’m working with people i’m going to see for the rest of my life 🧸 so i think even when we’re older, we’ll still be able to come here together

tubatu is forever!🥹 🐱do you think we’ll be able to come camping again? 🧸 maybe…like in 10 years? 🐱more like 20 🧸 20 years? 🐱 up to 10 years, i don't really think things will change all that dynamically 🧸 yeah, that’s true. 🧸 then 20 years from now? 🐱 i think it’ll be pretty similar. 🐱 i think i’ll still be doing tomorrow x together, just in a way that suits the level of stamina i’ll have then 🧸 true 🧸 20 years from now, if we really wanted to, we could definitely come camping. by then we’ll probably have a lot more free time, too. 🐱 that would be nice. 🐱 i hope we can live more relaxed 🐱 not now, though. right now i want to be busy 🐱 we could be even busier. i could do concerts every single day 🧸 i think tomorrow x together will basically be lifelong friends 🐱 yeah 🧸 it feels like i’m working with people i’m going to see for the rest of my life 🧸 so i think even when we’re older, we’ll still be able to come here together

녱🐱

53,808 Aufrufe • vor 28 Tagen

KILLARY VACCINES AND THE ELEPHANT IN THE ROOM XMRV I'm angry because parents across the state of California are being told, sent letters, sent emails, that their children must get a DTaP shot, must get a shot for diphtheria, tetanus and a cellular pertussis, a shot, and we know it causes AIDS. It's just Acquired Immune Disease. But they changed. The day before November 8, 2011, Killary, when she was Department of State, promised the world that she was going to create an AIDS free generation. It's going to take a lot of work. But what did she say? Oh, she said, we're going to use combination strategies. Oh, and they might have been right here in these two patents, the first of which was the test. November 8, 2011, is when she wrote, this was the test. Look at the date on this patent, 4/6/2010 and what did we say we could do? We could use both antibodies, proteins and PCR to tell you the diagnostic identification of variants of X, meaning Xeno, xenotropic. It's called MRV. It's not listed as Murine Leukemia Virus, related virus. It's listed as XMRV. So SARS-CoV-2 is an XMRV that contains the sticky spike protein from HIV, the glycoprotein. Judy MIkovits, PhD - 07/15/2025 The Real Dr Judy Show (I started at about 54 minutes): Patents: WHAT IS DTP (or DTaP)? WHEN I WAS J6ED IN 2011 WHY WERE THEY AT THE NIH CRIMINAL CENTER? PREMEDITATED MURDER OF 4 DECADES OF VACCINE INJURY BY THE XMRVS

KILLARY VACCINES AND THE ELEPHANT IN THE ROOM XMRV I'm angry because parents across the state of California are being told, sent letters, sent emails, that their children must get a DTaP shot, must get a shot for diphtheria, tetanus and a cellular pertussis, a shot, and we know it causes AIDS. It's just Acquired Immune Disease. But they changed. The day before November 8, 2011, Killary, when she was Department of State, promised the world that she was going to create an AIDS free generation. It's going to take a lot of work. But what did she say? Oh, she said, we're going to use combination strategies. Oh, and they might have been right here in these two patents, the first of which was the test. November 8, 2011, is when she wrote, this was the test. Look at the date on this patent, 4/6/2010 and what did we say we could do? We could use both antibodies, proteins and PCR to tell you the diagnostic identification of variants of X, meaning Xeno, xenotropic. It's called MRV. It's not listed as Murine Leukemia Virus, related virus. It's listed as XMRV. So SARS-CoV-2 is an XMRV that contains the sticky spike protein from HIV, the glycoprotein. Judy MIkovits, PhD - 07/15/2025 The Real Dr Judy Show (I started at about 54 minutes): Patents: WHAT IS DTP (or DTaP)? WHEN I WAS J6ED IN 2011 WHY WERE THEY AT THE NIH CRIMINAL CENTER? PREMEDITATED MURDER OF 4 DECADES OF VACCINE INJURY BY THE XMRVS

Judy A. Mikovits PhD

29,765 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Karpathy: "I've never felt this much behind as a programmer. And I've been doing this for 20 years." I've watched hundreds of AI talks. This keynote from the man who built Tesla Autopilot and co-founded OpenAI is the one I wish every developer had seen before writing another line of code. He calls what's happening a "magnitude 9 earthquake." Here's the part nobody expected to hear: > in November he was 80% manual + 20% AI. by December: flipped to 80% AI + 20% manual > that shift took him 30 days > "2025-2035 is the decade of agents" > the rules of programming are changing faster than our habits Right now the average developer opens Claude, types something, gets an answer, closes the tab. they think they're using AI. they're using maybe 10% of it. I went through everything he described and built 21 rules that actually change how Claude codes for you. the file that started this hit #1 on GitHub with 82,000 stars. coding accuracy from 65% to 94%. bookmark this

Karpathy: "I've never felt this much behind as a programmer. And I've been doing this for 20 years." I've watched hundreds of AI talks. This keynote from the man who built Tesla Autopilot and co-founded OpenAI is the one I wish every developer had seen before writing another line of code. He calls what's happening a "magnitude 9 earthquake." Here's the part nobody expected to hear: > in November he was 80% manual + 20% AI. by December: flipped to 80% AI + 20% manual > that shift took him 30 days > "2025-2035 is the decade of agents" > the rules of programming are changing faster than our habits Right now the average developer opens Claude, types something, gets an answer, closes the tab. they think they're using AI. they're using maybe 10% of it. I went through everything he described and built 21 rules that actually change how Claude codes for you. the file that started this hit #1 on GitHub with 82,000 stars. coding accuracy from 65% to 94%. bookmark this

Dep

137,555 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten