Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

It’s cheating—plain and simple. Smearing lotion on the lens to blind the proctoring AI isn’t “gaming the system”; it’s exploiting a technical flaw to get credit you didn’t earn. Tests exist to verify you mastered the material, not to see if you’re a better hacker than the software. And...

drinkonsaturday's profile picture

🚫👁️Drinks on Saturday🇺🇸

91,894 subscribers

9,743,835 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

ЮморОбразованиеНовости и политика
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Ansem explains why you need to learn AI right now “AI is going to make everybody 10x more efficient at whatever it is that they’re doing” “If you’re concerned about your job… you need to get up to speed and become an expert at using AI as fast as possible” “There’s going to be people who choose not to do that and people who do. In a few years, people are going to look at AI the same way as being able to use the internet” “Obviously someone who knows how to use the internet is a way better candidate than someone who doesn’t, it’s going to be the same with AI” “Whenever you have these technological breakthroughs happen, you create more jobs that didn’t even exist before. I think AI is going to do that more so than displace people”
1:11

Ansem explains why you need to learn AI right now “AI is going to make everybody 10x more efficient at whatever it is that they’re doing” “If you’re concerned about your job… you need to get up to speed and become an expert at using AI as fast as possible” “There’s going to be people who choose not to do that and people who do. In a few years, people are going to look at AI the same way as being able to use the internet” “Obviously someone who knows how to use the internet is a way better candidate than someone who doesn’t, it’s going to be the same with AI” “Whenever you have these technological breakthroughs happen, you create more jobs that didn’t even exist before. I think AI is going to do that more so than displace people”

Market Bubble

19,995 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Elon Musk in a new SpaceX employee meeting on why it’s important for Grok to succeed: "We gotta win here on the AI hardware and AI software. That is the most important message I wanted to convey today; is that we must win on AI, because the future is overwhelmingly AI and Robots. We won’t ultimately be able to control the AI, it’ll be too smart for that. But just like if you have a super genius child, you can still instill in that child the values and beliefs that you think are good and right. So that’s why it’s incredibly important that we succeed with Grok." Very strong message.
0:48

Elon Musk in a new SpaceX employee meeting on why it’s important for Grok to succeed: "We gotta win here on the AI hardware and AI software. That is the most important message I wanted to convey today; is that we must win on AI, because the future is overwhelmingly AI and Robots. We won’t ultimately be able to control the AI, it’ll be too smart for that. But just like if you have a super genius child, you can still instill in that child the values and beliefs that you think are good and right. So that’s why it’s incredibly important that we succeed with Grok." Very strong message.

Nic Cruz Patane

151,768 просмотров • 2 дней назад

Jensen Huang said if he were a student today, he wouldn’t prioritize coding. He’d prioritize learning how to talk to AI. Most people treat AI like Google. Type a question, get an answer, move on. Huang sees it differently. He calls it “expertise in artistry,” which sounds dramatic but makes sense when you think about it. The real skill isn’t using AI. It’s knowing what to ask for and how to refine it. “Learning to interact with AI is not unlike being really good at asking questions.” If you’re a doctor, can you use AI to catch diagnoses you’d miss? If you’re a lawyer, can you sharpen arguments faster than your competition? The leverage comes from pairing what you know with how well you can direct the tool. Domain expertise multiplied by AI fluency equals amplification. Without the expertise, the AI is just noise. Without fluency, you’re leaving most of the capability on the table. The question isn’t whether AI will replace you. It’s whether someone who knows how to use it better will.
1:18

Jensen Huang said if he were a student today, he wouldn’t prioritize coding. He’d prioritize learning how to talk to AI. Most people treat AI like Google. Type a question, get an answer, move on. Huang sees it differently. He calls it “expertise in artistry,” which sounds dramatic but makes sense when you think about it. The real skill isn’t using AI. It’s knowing what to ask for and how to refine it. “Learning to interact with AI is not unlike being really good at asking questions.” If you’re a doctor, can you use AI to catch diagnoses you’d miss? If you’re a lawyer, can you sharpen arguments faster than your competition? The leverage comes from pairing what you know with how well you can direct the tool. Domain expertise multiplied by AI fluency equals amplification. Without the expertise, the AI is just noise. Without fluency, you’re leaving most of the capability on the table. The question isn’t whether AI will replace you. It’s whether someone who knows how to use it better will.

Dustin

787,202 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Peter Thiel: Think of the future on three horizons “What you end up doing when you think of the future as indefinite is you pick a job that will be good on your resume because it will then lead to a different job later on.” Instead of viewing the future as indefinite, Thiel suggests that the students in the audience think of the future on three horizons: short term, medium term, and long term. Very short term is: Are you going to be happy and will you be learning a lot? Very long term is: Are you working on something important or meaningful? “I think we are in a skewed world where we overweight the medium term, and we underweight some combination of the short term and the long term.” Thiel would recalibrate it to: “Focus on some combination of short term and long term. And forget about the medium term.”
1:01

Peter Thiel: Think of the future on three horizons “What you end up doing when you think of the future as indefinite is you pick a job that will be good on your resume because it will then lead to a different job later on.” Instead of viewing the future as indefinite, Thiel suggests that the students in the audience think of the future on three horizons: short term, medium term, and long term. Very short term is: Are you going to be happy and will you be learning a lot? Very long term is: Are you working on something important or meaningful? “I think we are in a skewed world where we overweight the medium term, and we underweight some combination of the short term and the long term.” Thiel would recalibrate it to: “Focus on some combination of short term and long term. And forget about the medium term.”

Startup Archive

69,175 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Elon Musk on Grok: “I think an AI that is sort of SpaceX’s baby will be a very good AI. I think SpaceX is a collection of some of the very best humans on Earth, both in capability and morality and goodness, and I think we want to have an AI that is born of that capability and that morality and that goodness. I think that’s very, very important. So I’d like to encourage people to help out, actually, with the AI hardware on the ground and the AI software and, of course, with the AI satellites. Solar is going to be a very important part of that. The TerraFab will be a very important part of that, but we must also succeed on the software front, and we’re going to be training Grok on the sum total of all SpaceX information. So in a way, it will be trained on you. You will effectively be the parents of the AI. It will inherit your thoughts and ideas and beliefs, and I think that’s a good thing. So, yeah, we’ve got to win here on the AI hardware and the AI software. That maybe is the most important message. I think that is actually the most important message I wanted to convey today is that we must win on AI because the future is overwhelmingly AI and robots. So we won’t ultimately be able to control the AI. It’ll be too smart for that. But just like if you have a child that is a super genius child, you can still instill in that child the values and beliefs that you think are good and right. And so that’s why it’s incredibly important that we succeed with Grok. So, yeah, well, Grok 4.5 you’ve tried probably. We’ve got 4.6 coming out in about a week. And then 4.7 should be really pretty special. So I’d like to encourage everyone at SpaceX to use AI and to make it better.”
2:56

Elon Musk on Grok: “I think an AI that is sort of SpaceX’s baby will be a very good AI. I think SpaceX is a collection of some of the very best humans on Earth, both in capability and morality and goodness, and I think we want to have an AI that is born of that capability and that morality and that goodness. I think that’s very, very important. So I’d like to encourage people to help out, actually, with the AI hardware on the ground and the AI software and, of course, with the AI satellites. Solar is going to be a very important part of that. The TerraFab will be a very important part of that, but we must also succeed on the software front, and we’re going to be training Grok on the sum total of all SpaceX information. So in a way, it will be trained on you. You will effectively be the parents of the AI. It will inherit your thoughts and ideas and beliefs, and I think that’s a good thing. So, yeah, we’ve got to win here on the AI hardware and the AI software. That maybe is the most important message. I think that is actually the most important message I wanted to convey today is that we must win on AI because the future is overwhelmingly AI and robots. So we won’t ultimately be able to control the AI. It’ll be too smart for that. But just like if you have a child that is a super genius child, you can still instill in that child the values and beliefs that you think are good and right. And so that’s why it’s incredibly important that we succeed with Grok. So, yeah, well, Grok 4.5 you’ve tried probably. We’ve got 4.6 coming out in about a week. And then 4.7 should be really pretty special. So I’d like to encourage everyone at SpaceX to use AI and to make it better.”

DogeDesigner

61,304 просмотров • 2 дней назад

AI isn’t a buzzword it’s the new backbone of business. The rules have changed. Today, the first question investors ask isn’t if you use AI, it’s how much of your business runs on it. From underwriting to inventory, agriculture to logistics, AI is doing in seconds what used to take weeks. And the market knows it. Ignore these tools, and someone else will beat you on cost, speed, and scale.
3:04

AI isn’t a buzzword it’s the new backbone of business. The rules have changed. Today, the first question investors ask isn’t if you use AI, it’s how much of your business runs on it. From underwriting to inventory, agriculture to logistics, AI is doing in seconds what used to take weeks. And the market knows it. Ignore these tools, and someone else will beat you on cost, speed, and scale.

Kevin O'Leary aka Mr. Wonderful

32,774 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Jensen Huang just settled the AI jobs debate in one answer. Huang: “All the engineers at NVIDIA today use AI. AI basically does most of our coding. And yet we’re hiring more engineers than ever.” The largest AI chip company on Earth. Every engineer uses AI. AI handles most of the coding. And headcount is going up. Not down. Up. For three years, the consensus was simple. AI automates, humans exit. NVIDIA just broke that thesis in one sentence. Huang: “Our ambitions are greater than ever. Our expectations are greater than ever.” This is the part nobody sits with long enough. AI didn’t reduce what NVIDIA could do. It detonated what they were willing to attempt. The workload didn’t shrink. The vision outgrew it. When ambition scales faster than automation, you don’t cut people. You add them. Because you’re no longer solving last year’s problems. You’re chasing things that weren’t conceivable twelve months ago. That’s not a job killer. That’s a job multiplier. But only inside the organizations that actually moved. Huang: “How is that a bad condition for our country?” It’s not. The bad condition is what’s forming between the movers and everyone else. Between the companies that retooled and the ones still running pilots. Between the countries that committed and the ones that formed committees. Between the workers who adapted six months ago and the ones still waiting for permission. Huang: “In just the last six months it went from incredible but not useful to useful and incredible.” Six months. Not six years. Not a carefully managed transition. Six months between novelty and necessity. That’s not a timeline. That’s a verdict. And when that gap compounds quarterly, “we’ll get to it next year” stops being patience. It’s a resignation letter you haven’t signed yet. Huang: “We’re all in on it. Supercharged by it. Exhilarated by it.” Not cautious. Not hedging. Not “exploring potential use cases.” All in. Supercharged. Exhilarated. The man building the infrastructure for the entire era isn’t theorizing about what AI might become. He’s documenting what it already is. The shift didn’t send a warning. It landed. Quiet. Six months ago. And while half the world debated readiness, the other half became unreachable. The question was never whether AI replaces you. It’s whether AI moves the standard your entire industry measures itself against. NVIDIA just told you it already did. Not because anyone got worse. Because the people who moved first quietly redefined what good looks like. And that new standard doesn’t wait. Doesn’t negotiate. It just becomes the baseline. Whether you moved with it or not.
1:23

Jensen Huang just settled the AI jobs debate in one answer. Huang: “All the engineers at NVIDIA today use AI. AI basically does most of our coding. And yet we’re hiring more engineers than ever.” The largest AI chip company on Earth. Every engineer uses AI. AI handles most of the coding. And headcount is going up. Not down. Up. For three years, the consensus was simple. AI automates, humans exit. NVIDIA just broke that thesis in one sentence. Huang: “Our ambitions are greater than ever. Our expectations are greater than ever.” This is the part nobody sits with long enough. AI didn’t reduce what NVIDIA could do. It detonated what they were willing to attempt. The workload didn’t shrink. The vision outgrew it. When ambition scales faster than automation, you don’t cut people. You add them. Because you’re no longer solving last year’s problems. You’re chasing things that weren’t conceivable twelve months ago. That’s not a job killer. That’s a job multiplier. But only inside the organizations that actually moved. Huang: “How is that a bad condition for our country?” It’s not. The bad condition is what’s forming between the movers and everyone else. Between the companies that retooled and the ones still running pilots. Between the countries that committed and the ones that formed committees. Between the workers who adapted six months ago and the ones still waiting for permission. Huang: “In just the last six months it went from incredible but not useful to useful and incredible.” Six months. Not six years. Not a carefully managed transition. Six months between novelty and necessity. That’s not a timeline. That’s a verdict. And when that gap compounds quarterly, “we’ll get to it next year” stops being patience. It’s a resignation letter you haven’t signed yet. Huang: “We’re all in on it. Supercharged by it. Exhilarated by it.” Not cautious. Not hedging. Not “exploring potential use cases.” All in. Supercharged. Exhilarated. The man building the infrastructure for the entire era isn’t theorizing about what AI might become. He’s documenting what it already is. The shift didn’t send a warning. It landed. Quiet. Six months ago. And while half the world debated readiness, the other half became unreachable. The question was never whether AI replaces you. It’s whether AI moves the standard your entire industry measures itself against. NVIDIA just told you it already did. Not because anyone got worse. Because the people who moved first quietly redefined what good looks like. And that new standard doesn’t wait. Doesn’t negotiate. It just becomes the baseline. Whether you moved with it or not.

Dustin

21,436 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

If you don't know what a RAG system is, you're already behind. Plenty of people are still typing questions into ChatGPT and pasting answers back out. That's the beginner level. You're renting a smart stranger who forgets you the second you close the tab and makes things up, because it has never seen your actual work. A RAG system is a completely different level of using AI. You build an AI plugged into your own world. Your files, company's docs, notes. It's not pulling from the internet, it only knows what you fed it. Ask it anything and it digs through your data, finds the answer, and shows you which document it came from. That's the gap. One person is asking a chatbot for generic answers. The other has built a private expert that knows their business cold and answers with receipts. And that gap is worth real money: > At work, the person who can wire a company's knowledge into an AI that actually answers correctly is rare and paid like it. > As a business, companies pay serious money for a system that reads their internal docs and answers staff and customers accurately. You build it once, you sell it. > For yourself, you get a second brain that actually remembers. Same skill behind all three, and it's still rare enough to be worth learning. Full breakdown in the article below.
0:59

If you don't know what a RAG system is, you're already behind. Plenty of people are still typing questions into ChatGPT and pasting answers back out. That's the beginner level. You're renting a smart stranger who forgets you the second you close the tab and makes things up, because it has never seen your actual work. A RAG system is a completely different level of using AI. You build an AI plugged into your own world. Your files, company's docs, notes. It's not pulling from the internet, it only knows what you fed it. Ask it anything and it digs through your data, finds the answer, and shows you which document it came from. That's the gap. One person is asking a chatbot for generic answers. The other has built a private expert that knows their business cold and answers with receipts. And that gap is worth real money: > At work, the person who can wire a company's knowledge into an AI that actually answers correctly is rare and paid like it. > As a business, companies pay serious money for a system that reads their internal docs and answers staff and customers accurately. You build it once, you sell it. > For yourself, you get a second brain that actually remembers. Same skill behind all three, and it's still rare enough to be worth learning. Full breakdown in the article below.

Yarchi

32,840 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Peter Thiel on how to think about the future “What you end up doing when you think of the future as indefinite is you pick a job that will be good on your resume because it will then lead to a different job later on.” Instead of viewing the future as indefinite, Thiel suggests that the students in the audience think of the future on three horizons: short term, medium term, and long term. And he defines them as follows: 1. Short term = Are you going to be happy and will you be learning a lot? 2. Medium term = How good is it on your resume? 3. Long term = Are you working on something important or meaningful? “I think we are in a skewed world where we overweight the medium term, and we underweight some combination of the short term and the long term.” Thiel recommends recalibrating it to: “Focus on some combination of short term and long term. And forget about the medium term.” Video source: Radical Discourse (2014)
1:06

Peter Thiel on how to think about the future “What you end up doing when you think of the future as indefinite is you pick a job that will be good on your resume because it will then lead to a different job later on.” Instead of viewing the future as indefinite, Thiel suggests that the students in the audience think of the future on three horizons: short term, medium term, and long term. And he defines them as follows: 1. Short term = Are you going to be happy and will you be learning a lot? 2. Medium term = How good is it on your resume? 3. Long term = Are you working on something important or meaningful? “I think we are in a skewed world where we overweight the medium term, and we underweight some combination of the short term and the long term.” Thiel recommends recalibrating it to: “Focus on some combination of short term and long term. And forget about the medium term.” Video source: Radical Discourse (2014)

Startup Archive

43,027 просмотров • 1 год назад

Everyone’s freaking out about the tariffs and the stock market dropping, but here’s the deal: This isn’t the end of the economy. If you're a real investor, you don’t make decisions based on headlines. You think long term. The market is still up over time. Wealth is built by staying steady. When the market dips, it’s not time to panic—It’s time to buy. It’s on sale. The only people who get hurt on a roller coaster are the ones who jump off in the middle. Stay in. Keep investing. You’ll be just fine.
1:30

Everyone’s freaking out about the tariffs and the stock market dropping, but here’s the deal: This isn’t the end of the economy. If you're a real investor, you don’t make decisions based on headlines. You think long term. The market is still up over time. Wealth is built by staying steady. When the market dips, it’s not time to panic—It’s time to buy. It’s on sale. The only people who get hurt on a roller coaster are the ones who jump off in the middle. Stay in. Keep investing. You’ll be just fine.

Dave Ramsey

1,210,710 просмотров • 1 год назад

this is kinda insane used this ai tooI to turn a simple idea into a viral video literally in seconds. millions of clips already made with it to test it out, reply 'ai' and I’ll send you the link to the software + prompts you can use.
0:28

this is kinda insane used this ai tooI to turn a simple idea into a viral video literally in seconds. millions of clips already made with it to test it out, reply 'ai' and I’ll send you the link to the software + prompts you can use.

Vyn

514,598 просмотров • 1 год назад

Is the rise of FDEs a short-term phenomenon or a continuous feature of the AI ecosystem? “I have a bit of a hot take: I think it's the future for the short term. Right now there's a concentration of people in San Francisco who really know how to deploy agents, eval agents, and be AI first, and that knowledge just isn't out there yet. Eventually it will be. At that point you won't need teams to set up AI agents for every enterprise, and it'll become more of a job function, similar to software engineering.” Do you agree? Do you agree with the dissemination of knowledge FDEs will be needed less Matan Grinberg Nikesh Arora Shyam Sankar
0:39

Is the rise of FDEs a short-term phenomenon or a continuous feature of the AI ecosystem? “I have a bit of a hot take: I think it's the future for the short term. Right now there's a concentration of people in San Francisco who really know how to deploy agents, eval agents, and be AI first, and that knowledge just isn't out there yet. Eventually it will be. At that point you won't need teams to set up AI agents for every enterprise, and it'll become more of a job function, similar to software engineering.” Do you agree? Do you agree with the dissemination of knowledge FDEs will be needed less Matan Grinberg Nikesh Arora Shyam Sankar

Harry Stebbings

19,255 просмотров • 16 дней назад

You know what I would tell people on the street? To keep calm and remain optimistic. You have to keep in mind that EVERY NATION has stake in the game, whether it’s the Middle East, the US, China, Japan, it doesn’t matter. Everyone in the world is feeling these effects, and it’s in everyone’s best interest to get a deal done sooner rather than later. When this conflict IS finally over, you can bet that the oil prices will take care of itself. The pain, while it’s here, it’s in the short term. Think of the bigger picture: we will be selling stuff to all these countries affected. The AI and tourism industry in the UAE will boom again. Japan and China can continue remaining the powerhouses that they are. It’s a win-win.
2:36

You know what I would tell people on the street? To keep calm and remain optimistic. You have to keep in mind that EVERY NATION has stake in the game, whether it’s the Middle East, the US, China, Japan, it doesn’t matter. Everyone in the world is feeling these effects, and it’s in everyone’s best interest to get a deal done sooner rather than later. When this conflict IS finally over, you can bet that the oil prices will take care of itself. The pain, while it’s here, it’s in the short term. Think of the bigger picture: we will be selling stuff to all these countries affected. The AI and tourism industry in the UAE will boom again. Japan and China can continue remaining the powerhouses that they are. It’s a win-win.

Kevin O'Leary aka Mr. Wonderful

25,658 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

At the closed Accelerate AI event, OpenAI director Sam Altman unexpectedly said: "I used to warn that AI would quickly wipe out a lot of ordinary office jobs for young professionals. I'm glad I was wrong. So far it's going nowhere near as badly as I feared" He described the next shift. not smarter prompts, but an AI that runs all the time: it understands you and your company's goals and keeps looking for ways to help on its own instead of waiting to be asked. today you ask the system to do something and it goes off to do it. soon it just won't switch off. Knowing how to talk to AI is no longer a skill of the future, it's the baseline, like knowing how to use Google today. and the pay for it will match that, low. The one who wins is the one who sets the business goals and controls the result. either you adapt fast, or you compete with AI for pennies. there will be almost no middle ground left. bookmark it and watch the short interview ↓
2:11

At the closed Accelerate AI event, OpenAI director Sam Altman unexpectedly said: "I used to warn that AI would quickly wipe out a lot of ordinary office jobs for young professionals. I'm glad I was wrong. So far it's going nowhere near as badly as I feared" He described the next shift. not smarter prompts, but an AI that runs all the time: it understands you and your company's goals and keeps looking for ways to help on its own instead of waiting to be asked. today you ask the system to do something and it goes off to do it. soon it just won't switch off. Knowing how to talk to AI is no longer a skill of the future, it's the baseline, like knowing how to use Google today. and the pay for it will match that, low. The one who wins is the one who sets the business goals and controls the result. either you adapt fast, or you compete with AI for pennies. there will be almost no middle ground left. bookmark it and watch the short interview ↓

Damir Akaza

85,197 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

🧸 “it’s the two visuals” that’s right! 🐰 that’s right…you found the flaw! 🧸 why is it a flaw…? 🐰 it’s apparently the way ai speaks…something like “you found the flaw!” or was it “you got the flaw!” or “you found the key point!” something like that… 🧸 isn’t it “you found the key point” 🐰 apparently it’s the way…was it chatgpt? speaks (*it’s a meme that imitates the way conversational ai responds) 🐰 i was going to cut my hair today but the hair stylist told me not to cut it 🧸 why? 🐰 apparently the current length is perfect for styling…it’s really long 🧸 but it gets a bit lifted with styling, it might feel a little bushy usually but it gets lifted when it’s styled 🐰i want to cut it short, it’s really uncomfortable 🐰 (reading comments) apparently it’s “you got the key point!” 🧸 exactly, it’s “key point” 🐰 i see~ 🧸 saying you caught the flaw would be like saying “what are you saying right now?” it’s like telling the person who said we were two visuals that they said the wrong thing 🐰 👀 🧸 the weather is really nice today..! 🐰 it’s a warm day today 🧸 it’s the kind of weather that makes me want to go on a walk 🐰 i went to the hybe rooftop wearing a short sleeved t-shirt and it’s almost like the outdoors…it was warmer than i expected!
1:23

🧸 “it’s the two visuals” that’s right! 🐰 that’s right…you found the flaw! 🧸 why is it a flaw…? 🐰 it’s apparently the way ai speaks…something like “you found the flaw!” or was it “you got the flaw!” or “you found the key point!” something like that… 🧸 isn’t it “you found the key point” 🐰 apparently it’s the way…was it chatgpt? speaks (*it’s a meme that imitates the way conversational ai responds) 🐰 i was going to cut my hair today but the hair stylist told me not to cut it 🧸 why? 🐰 apparently the current length is perfect for styling…it’s really long 🧸 but it gets a bit lifted with styling, it might feel a little bushy usually but it gets lifted when it’s styled 🐰i want to cut it short, it’s really uncomfortable 🐰 (reading comments) apparently it’s “you got the key point!” 🧸 exactly, it’s “key point” 🐰 i see~ 🧸 saying you caught the flaw would be like saying “what are you saying right now?” it’s like telling the person who said we were two visuals that they said the wrong thing 🐰 👀 🧸 the weather is really nice today..! 🐰 it’s a warm day today 🧸 it’s the kind of weather that makes me want to go on a walk 🐰 i went to the hybe rooftop wearing a short sleeved t-shirt and it’s almost like the outdoors…it was warmer than i expected!

💬

63,491 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

One of the pillars of my campaign is term limits. I’ve already term-limited myself in the House. And in the United States Senate, I will serve no more than 12 years. Period. John Cornyn has already spent twice that in Washington. Now he’s asking for six more years. That’s NOT service. Public office is not a retirement plan. It’s not a lifetime appointment. It’s a calling, and it comes with an expiration date. On March 3, Texans have a choice. You can protect the system. Or you can take a sledgehammer to it. Vote for a NEW generation of leadership … one that answers to you, NOT to Washington. The time is NOW.
1:14

One of the pillars of my campaign is term limits. I’ve already term-limited myself in the House. And in the United States Senate, I will serve no more than 12 years. Period. John Cornyn has already spent twice that in Washington. Now he’s asking for six more years. That’s NOT service. Public office is not a retirement plan. It’s not a lifetime appointment. It’s a calling, and it comes with an expiration date. On March 3, Texans have a choice. You can protect the system. Or you can take a sledgehammer to it. Vote for a NEW generation of leadership … one that answers to you, NOT to Washington. The time is NOW.

Wesley Hunt

44,831 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Why is Palantir so expensive? You don’t need to look at spreadsheets. Just consider this: The market knows NVIDIA sells the shovels for the AI goldrush. The market is realizing that AI isn’t being monetized at the commercial level because although it’s cool, it’s not unlocking any real insights yet. The market now anticipates that Palantir is selling the maps to find the gold…. Gold being AI-driven insights that actually solve difficult problems. Software that works. Since 2021, NVIDIA’s revenue has exploded from $16B to $96B. Palantir’s TTM revenue is $2.5B. The trajectory of Palantir has changed since AIP released in 2023, which is enabling the company to scale. If NVIDIA sells the shovels, and Palantir provides the maps, then the market believes Palantir will see the same explosion of growth within the commercial market, which the market believes has an almost unlimited TAM for Palantir. A lot of people missed out on NVIDIA. While Palantir’s market cap is expensive at $95B, it is nothing compared to NVIDIA’s $3.26T market cap in terms of size. The market doesn’t want to miss out on the next big thing. At this point, investors have thrown all standard methods of valuation out of the window… Those days were years ago. To me, at this point, buying the stock is betting on NVIDIA-like growth (No I’m not saying the company will shoot to a $3T market cap in 2 years — you get the point). If the company does not show this sort of revenue growth, the stock will be punished. This is the risk investors are willing to take. While I am very bullish on the company in the long run, I, like everyone else, have no clue what will actually happen in the short term. This is not a stock to play on the short term. This is why I continue to hold, regardless of how “expensive” the stock gets. I personally believe Palantir does in fact carry the potential to see explosive revenue growth to more than enough justify its current ratios. I’m not saying it will happen this quarter. But the potential is there. It’s a matter of when, in my opinion. I would never risk selling what I view as my golden ticket to wealth with the justification of “it’s too expensive, the price will come back down and I can buy even more then”. If the stock crashes, I can start buying more shares regardless — I don’t want to get greedy and try to time the market. I would never forgive myself if I sold and the stock ended up soaring so high that even after a crash, it would be far too expensive for me to get back in with my original position size (plus capital gains tax). I don’t care who agrees with me or who thinks I’m crazy for saying this — it’s a real risk to me and I’m not willing to take it. This is not me telling you to buy $PLTR. My average is $8.50. Only you can decide what is right, and your decision should be made on your own level of conviction from studying the company — nothing else. This is me telling you why it’s so expensive. Again, I believe that if the stock does not continue to crush earnings each quarter, even the slightest miss, the stock will be punished in the short term. For longs, it’s another opportunity to accumulate more. This is my opinion, of course. 5-10 years from now, we’ll see who was right. Chips & Ontology.
1:59

Why is Palantir so expensive? You don’t need to look at spreadsheets. Just consider this: The market knows NVIDIA sells the shovels for the AI goldrush. The market is realizing that AI isn’t being monetized at the commercial level because although it’s cool, it’s not unlocking any real insights yet. The market now anticipates that Palantir is selling the maps to find the gold…. Gold being AI-driven insights that actually solve difficult problems. Software that works. Since 2021, NVIDIA’s revenue has exploded from $16B to $96B. Palantir’s TTM revenue is $2.5B. The trajectory of Palantir has changed since AIP released in 2023, which is enabling the company to scale. If NVIDIA sells the shovels, and Palantir provides the maps, then the market believes Palantir will see the same explosion of growth within the commercial market, which the market believes has an almost unlimited TAM for Palantir. A lot of people missed out on NVIDIA. While Palantir’s market cap is expensive at $95B, it is nothing compared to NVIDIA’s $3.26T market cap in terms of size. The market doesn’t want to miss out on the next big thing. At this point, investors have thrown all standard methods of valuation out of the window… Those days were years ago. To me, at this point, buying the stock is betting on NVIDIA-like growth (No I’m not saying the company will shoot to a $3T market cap in 2 years — you get the point). If the company does not show this sort of revenue growth, the stock will be punished. This is the risk investors are willing to take. While I am very bullish on the company in the long run, I, like everyone else, have no clue what will actually happen in the short term. This is not a stock to play on the short term. This is why I continue to hold, regardless of how “expensive” the stock gets. I personally believe Palantir does in fact carry the potential to see explosive revenue growth to more than enough justify its current ratios. I’m not saying it will happen this quarter. But the potential is there. It’s a matter of when, in my opinion. I would never risk selling what I view as my golden ticket to wealth with the justification of “it’s too expensive, the price will come back down and I can buy even more then”. If the stock crashes, I can start buying more shares regardless — I don’t want to get greedy and try to time the market. I would never forgive myself if I sold and the stock ended up soaring so high that even after a crash, it would be far too expensive for me to get back in with my original position size (plus capital gains tax). I don’t care who agrees with me or who thinks I’m crazy for saying this — it’s a real risk to me and I’m not willing to take it. This is not me telling you to buy $PLTR. My average is $8.50. Only you can decide what is right, and your decision should be made on your own level of conviction from studying the company — nothing else. This is me telling you why it’s so expensive. Again, I believe that if the stock does not continue to crush earnings each quarter, even the slightest miss, the stock will be punished in the short term. For longs, it’s another opportunity to accumulate more. This is my opinion, of course. 5-10 years from now, we’ll see who was right. Chips & Ontology.

Jack Prescott

258,450 просмотров • 1 год назад

Friends this is not the time to fear ai 🤖 this is the time to be curious and play with it and understand it … please 🙏 don’t put your head in the sand … there is so much you can’t control when it comes to ai 🤖 and how it will play out … but there is a lot you can control on how you work with it and use it to build something for you and your family !!! Pls If you’re finally ready to not be scared of ai pls leave a 🤖 emoji in the the chat
0:30

Friends this is not the time to fear ai 🤖 this is the time to be curious and play with it and understand it … please 🙏 don’t put your head in the sand … there is so much you can’t control when it comes to ai 🤖 and how it will play out … but there is a lot you can control on how you work with it and use it to build something for you and your family !!! Pls If you’re finally ready to not be scared of ai pls leave a 🤖 emoji in the the chat

Gary Vaynerchuk

15,342 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Mark Cuban just told every CEO in America their expiration date is closer than they think. No stage. No buildup. One sentence that split a room. Cuban: “There’s only two types of companies in this world. Those who are great at AI and everybody else.” That’s not a prediction. That’s a sorting that already happened while you were still forming a task force about it. He didn’t warn you the future was coming. He told you it already left without you. The default executive move right now is delegation. Let the tech team handle it. Get a summary. Wait for clarity. Cuban buried that entire playbook in one line. Cuban: “If you’re a CEO, you can’t just say, ‘I’m gonna get my tech guys to understand it and educate me on it.’ You have to understand it.” The CEO who delegates AI understanding isn’t buying time. They’re handing the steering wheel to someone who doesn’t choose the road. This isn’t a corner office problem. Cuban: “Whether you are an employee, you’re gonna have to understand how it impacts your job, or how you can use it to be better at your job.” Nobody is building you a ramp. Nobody is holding the door. The people who internalized this six months ago aren’t slightly ahead. They operate at a different speed entirely. They compound daily. Everyone else is still standing in the blast radius wondering what the sound was. Then Cuban said the thing nobody in media says without a safety net. Cuban: “If you don’t know AI, you are going to fail. Period, end of story.” No footnote. No hedge. No soft landing. A verdict that landed like a lock clicking shut. The sorting is already happening. In hiring decisions that never get explained. In contracts awarded to the faster company while yours was still forming a committee. In promotions given to the person who automated half their role before anyone asked them to. Every technological shift sells the same lie. That the window stays open long enough for everyone who wants through. No one tells you the moment you were sorted. You just wake up one morning on the wrong side of a line you never saw drawn.
0:33

Mark Cuban just told every CEO in America their expiration date is closer than they think. No stage. No buildup. One sentence that split a room. Cuban: “There’s only two types of companies in this world. Those who are great at AI and everybody else.” That’s not a prediction. That’s a sorting that already happened while you were still forming a task force about it. He didn’t warn you the future was coming. He told you it already left without you. The default executive move right now is delegation. Let the tech team handle it. Get a summary. Wait for clarity. Cuban buried that entire playbook in one line. Cuban: “If you’re a CEO, you can’t just say, ‘I’m gonna get my tech guys to understand it and educate me on it.’ You have to understand it.” The CEO who delegates AI understanding isn’t buying time. They’re handing the steering wheel to someone who doesn’t choose the road. This isn’t a corner office problem. Cuban: “Whether you are an employee, you’re gonna have to understand how it impacts your job, or how you can use it to be better at your job.” Nobody is building you a ramp. Nobody is holding the door. The people who internalized this six months ago aren’t slightly ahead. They operate at a different speed entirely. They compound daily. Everyone else is still standing in the blast radius wondering what the sound was. Then Cuban said the thing nobody in media says without a safety net. Cuban: “If you don’t know AI, you are going to fail. Period, end of story.” No footnote. No hedge. No soft landing. A verdict that landed like a lock clicking shut. The sorting is already happening. In hiring decisions that never get explained. In contracts awarded to the faster company while yours was still forming a committee. In promotions given to the person who automated half their role before anyone asked them to. Every technological shift sells the same lie. That the window stays open long enough for everyone who wants through. No one tells you the moment you were sorted. You just wake up one morning on the wrong side of a line you never saw drawn.

Dustin

25,398 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

You’re not going to lose your job to AI. You might lose it to somebody who knows how to use AI. It’s made me a smarter, more thoughtful writer and producer. A lot of what I talk about I research through AI first, but the key is asking it the deepest, most penetrating questions you can think of. That’s when it actually delivers. The real promise here isn’t just productivity. It could give us a four or even three day workweek at the same living standards. Work 20 to 40 percent less and maintain the same lifestyle. Learn the tools. Ask better questions. Get your life back.
0:52

You’re not going to lose your job to AI. You might lose it to somebody who knows how to use AI. It’s made me a smarter, more thoughtful writer and producer. A lot of what I talk about I research through AI first, but the key is asking it the deepest, most penetrating questions you can think of. That’s when it actually delivers. The real promise here isn’t just productivity. It could give us a four or even three day workweek at the same living standards. Work 20 to 40 percent less and maintain the same lifestyle. Learn the tools. Ask better questions. Get your life back.

Anthony Scaramucci

22,157 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад