Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

It's interesting that while many #Browns fans are irate about the reverse play call that resulted in a fumble, no one is complaining about the back-to-back trick plays Kevin Stefanski called earlier in the game. That's because the T-formation play for the touchdown worked, and the RB snap reverse...

thedawgspodcast's profile picture

The Dawgs - A Cleveland Browns Podcast

15,653 subscribers

126,325 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)

#Browns
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

LB popped some during A Day and a guy that’s in the rotation who probably isn’t getting enough kudos is Cayden Jones. I like this rep from the junior, even though it resulted in a TD. A couple of things first - OL gets a good jump off the snap. But Jones has instant play recognition and immediately dials in on the mobile design to the right - tracking his responsibility - the QB. Also have to acknowledge that it feels like Daniel Hill gives up on the play early - which in live action would’ve led to clean lane for Jones to hit the QB.
0:12

LB popped some during A Day and a guy that’s in the rotation who probably isn’t getting enough kudos is Cayden Jones. I like this rep from the junior, even though it resulted in a TD. A couple of things first - OL gets a good jump off the snap. But Jones has instant play recognition and immediately dials in on the mobile design to the right - tracking his responsibility - the QB. Also have to acknowledge that it feels like Daniel Hill gives up on the play early - which in live action would’ve led to clean lane for Jones to hit the QB.

Waaaay Offsides Cotton

11,895 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

•The false start call on John Michael Schmitz. •The non-call for pass interference to Wan’Dale Robinson. •The non-call for pass interference on the final play of the game in the end zone. I’m not one to blame officials for losing games, but when it’s obvious, sometimes, it does need to be pointed out. Like the non-pass interference call to Darren Waller in the Week 6 game vs the Bills that ended the game. That was as blatantly bad as it got. In the Giants 33-25 loss yesterday to the Eagles, the officials were pretty bad to where several non-calls were that obvious. “I think there were some flags that could have been thrown, but that is not our place. That is not fair. If it’s a call, call it. It shouldn’t be a last-play mentality. If it’s a call, and if it’s blatant, then it should be called. It should be honored like it is the first play of the game.”- Giants QB Tyrod Taylor. “I’d say, any official questions, you can ask those guys.”- Giants head coach Brian Daboll, who clearly looked angry when he entered the press conference room, probably knew he’d get a massive fine if he said what he wanted to, so he kept it simple.
0:05

•The false start call on John Michael Schmitz. •The non-call for pass interference to Wan’Dale Robinson. •The non-call for pass interference on the final play of the game in the end zone. I’m not one to blame officials for losing games, but when it’s obvious, sometimes, it does need to be pointed out. Like the non-pass interference call to Darren Waller in the Week 6 game vs the Bills that ended the game. That was as blatantly bad as it got. In the Giants 33-25 loss yesterday to the Eagles, the officials were pretty bad to where several non-calls were that obvious. “I think there were some flags that could have been thrown, but that is not our place. That is not fair. If it’s a call, call it. It shouldn’t be a last-play mentality. If it’s a call, and if it’s blatant, then it should be called. It should be honored like it is the first play of the game.”- Giants QB Tyrod Taylor. “I’d say, any official questions, you can ask those guys.”- Giants head coach Brian Daboll, who clearly looked angry when he entered the press conference room, probably knew he’d get a massive fine if he said what he wanted to, so he kept it simple.

Doug Rush

171,398 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

Officially moving on from Tech game after I get this thought off my chest. I more than welcome anyone smarter than me in regards to the football to chime in. I truly, truly, truly cannot wrap my head around the thought process here. These two plays I'm sure anyone with brain can agree officially sealed KU's slim chances in having a chance to win this game. The play calling to me seems like completely flipped in logic at best? First one, you are down 4, on your own 30 so you are not going to go for this. Ignoring that we were getting dominated in the trenches in this game and that the 'obvious' play is a run, I don't get why we make the decision in a must get spot to take the ball out of our QB's (who at the time was rolling) hands. Jalon Daniels is our best player. In an absolute must get/need, we should be relying on him to make a play. Then the second one. I obviously don't know the answer here, but I feel somewhat confident that the reason we didn't run here was because of how the earlier 3rd & 1 run went. While I don't necessarily agree with the premise of decision making on this alone, I can appreciate the recognition that we are going to struggle to gain a yard in an obvious run situation. But the thing is, we are in go for it range so the one thing you absolutely cannot have is a massive negative play. Literally anything else is okay (obviously not a turnover). I truly don't think there's a good chance we run the ball on this attempt and get a yard. But THIS situation gives you a free shot at it if you want to take it. I think this play call would have worked if we didn't let their best player run at our qb freely but I'd just argue this play had a ton of potential risk that wasn't necessary. Hell even a play action pass out of out shot gun or something rolling JD out to the left would have given us a good shot at first down with an escape route to bail out on the play if something went wrong. I'm once again for the millionth time saying I know and understand that this entire staff knows more about football in their pinky than I do. But I do think the game has evolved and game + clock management doesn't really require football knowledge/have a direct correlation to one's football knowledge. It's not as simple as ESPN's graphic says GO so you should go etc, there are variables and human behavior etc to deal with and I understand that. But we are just getting these situations downright wrong. We are flipping a coin that has a 20 pound weight attached to the heads side and calling tails almost every single time. S/O anyone who read all this but would just love some insight if there's anyone who disagrees and is a lot smarter than I!
0:10

Officially moving on from Tech game after I get this thought off my chest. I more than welcome anyone smarter than me in regards to the football to chime in. I truly, truly, truly cannot wrap my head around the thought process here. These two plays I'm sure anyone with brain can agree officially sealed KU's slim chances in having a chance to win this game. The play calling to me seems like completely flipped in logic at best? First one, you are down 4, on your own 30 so you are not going to go for this. Ignoring that we were getting dominated in the trenches in this game and that the 'obvious' play is a run, I don't get why we make the decision in a must get spot to take the ball out of our QB's (who at the time was rolling) hands. Jalon Daniels is our best player. In an absolute must get/need, we should be relying on him to make a play. Then the second one. I obviously don't know the answer here, but I feel somewhat confident that the reason we didn't run here was because of how the earlier 3rd & 1 run went. While I don't necessarily agree with the premise of decision making on this alone, I can appreciate the recognition that we are going to struggle to gain a yard in an obvious run situation. But the thing is, we are in go for it range so the one thing you absolutely cannot have is a massive negative play. Literally anything else is okay (obviously not a turnover). I truly don't think there's a good chance we run the ball on this attempt and get a yard. But THIS situation gives you a free shot at it if you want to take it. I think this play call would have worked if we didn't let their best player run at our qb freely but I'd just argue this play had a ton of potential risk that wasn't necessary. Hell even a play action pass out of out shot gun or something rolling JD out to the left would have given us a good shot at first down with an escape route to bail out on the play if something went wrong. I'm once again for the millionth time saying I know and understand that this entire staff knows more about football in their pinky than I do. But I do think the game has evolved and game + clock management doesn't really require football knowledge/have a direct correlation to one's football knowledge. It's not as simple as ESPN's graphic says GO so you should go etc, there are variables and human behavior etc to deal with and I understand that. But we are just getting these situations downright wrong. We are flipping a coin that has a 20 pound weight attached to the heads side and calling tails almost every single time. S/O anyone who read all this but would just love some insight if there's anyone who disagrees and is a lot smarter than I!

Bryson Stricker

33,876 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

Insane: 64-year-old QB Steve Young says he can still play QB in the NFL if he needed to make a return. “I absolutely feel confident that I could take the snap, run the screen game, throw the ball in the flat, maybe throw a slant. It’s not like, ‘Put on the pads and go play.’ Still, if it was ‘Hunger Games’? If they said, you had to do this or die? Yeah, you could pull off something,” Young is one of the best to ever do it 🐐
0:14

Insane: 64-year-old QB Steve Young says he can still play QB in the NFL if he needed to make a return. “I absolutely feel confident that I could take the snap, run the screen game, throw the ball in the flat, maybe throw a slant. It’s not like, ‘Put on the pads and go play.’ Still, if it was ‘Hunger Games’? If they said, you had to do this or die? Yeah, you could pull off something,” Young is one of the best to ever do it 🐐

Dov Kleiman

1,243,424 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

We used Quad formations to create a light box and ran QB run game to the single-WR side! - Quad tag brings four receivers to the field, pulling the entire defense heavy that way and leaving the boundary side lighter - Our Long Trap scheme still leaves the backside DE unblocked while the pulling guard gives us a +1 at the point of attack. - QB takes the snap and runs it straight the RB path to the single-WR side where the defense is weak in numbers Did anyone else utilize Quad formations this last season? What were your favorite plays with it?
0:10

We used Quad formations to create a light box and ran QB run game to the single-WR side! - Quad tag brings four receivers to the field, pulling the entire defense heavy that way and leaving the boundary side lighter - Our Long Trap scheme still leaves the backside DE unblocked while the pulling guard gives us a +1 at the point of attack. - QB takes the snap and runs it straight the RB path to the single-WR side where the defense is weak in numbers Did anyone else utilize Quad formations this last season? What were your favorite plays with it?

Coach Free

19,669 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

I’m starting to think Kevin Stefanski just wants Shedeur Sanders to be a game manager, but that’s not who he is. Stefanski is all about safe checkdowns and keeping things simple, while Shedeur is built to make the big-time throws. So when Shedeur finally sees a chance, he’s letting it fly no matter what—because he knows he can make it. Stefanski trying to dumb him down is only going to backfire. You can’t handcuff a QB like Shedeur, you gotta let him play his game. TAKE A LISTEN TO THE QUICK 18 SECOND VIDEO
0:17

I’m starting to think Kevin Stefanski just wants Shedeur Sanders to be a game manager, but that’s not who he is. Stefanski is all about safe checkdowns and keeping things simple, while Shedeur is built to make the big-time throws. So when Shedeur finally sees a chance, he’s letting it fly no matter what—because he knows he can make it. Stefanski trying to dumb him down is only going to backfire. You can’t handcuff a QB like Shedeur, you gotta let him play his game. TAKE A LISTEN TO THE QUICK 18 SECOND VIDEO

NoChillWill

589,105 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

Despite clear video evidence, Tony Grossi remains adamant that Shedeur Sanders did NOT throw any touchdowns against the Bills in joint practice. "There were not touchdown passes by Shedeur yesterday. Live with it, realize it, accept it." Sanders connected downfield with Malachi Corley on a play where Corley easily scored. Later, Sanders threw a screen to KC Concepcion, who hit the crease for a score. People are making this QB Tracker drama about specific QBs; the part that we’re missing by doing this is…the BROWNS scored against the Bills defense. KC, Corley, these young guys made plays in this scrimmage that should be celebrated by fans; not scrutinized because of who threw the pass.
0:16

Despite clear video evidence, Tony Grossi remains adamant that Shedeur Sanders did NOT throw any touchdowns against the Bills in joint practice. "There were not touchdown passes by Shedeur yesterday. Live with it, realize it, accept it." Sanders connected downfield with Malachi Corley on a play where Corley easily scored. Later, Sanders threw a screen to KC Concepcion, who hit the crease for a score. People are making this QB Tracker drama about specific QBs; the part that we’re missing by doing this is…the BROWNS scored against the Bills defense. KC, Corley, these young guys made plays in this scrimmage that should be celebrated by fans; not scrutinized because of who threw the pass.

The Dawgs - A Cleveland Browns Podcast

209,959 görüntüleme • 15 gün önce

#Colts QB Anthony Richardson on leaving the game for one play in the 3Q: “Tired, I ain’t gonna lie. That was a lot of running right there that I did, and I didn’t think I was gonna be able to go that next play. So, I just told (HC Shane Steichen) I needed a break right there.”
0:16

#Colts QB Anthony Richardson on leaving the game for one play in the 3Q: “Tired, I ain’t gonna lie. That was a lot of running right there that I did, and I didn’t think I was gonna be able to go that next play. So, I just told (HC Shane Steichen) I needed a break right there.”

James Boyd

389,684 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

I have not seen enough about the decision from Mike Vrabel and Tim Kelly to go for 2 down by 8 last night. Here’s why I loved it: 1) NFL teams this season have been successful on 55% of two-point conversion attempts. The odds were in the Titans’ favor. 2) Will Levis was dealing in the 2nd half. 3) Titans still had all three timeouts and the two-minute warning. 4) Miami struggled to move the ball on offense all night. Their three scoring drives went for 12, 7, and 59 yards. 5) If successful on the two-point conversion, a stop on defense and a TD wins the game. If unsuccessful, you can still send it to OT. 6) Titans offense marched down the field, scored the TD to make it a one possession game and essentially told Miami, “we are going for two because we know you cannot stop us right now.” The odds are in your favor. It’s a good mathematical decision. You want to psych out an opposing offense? Give them the ball knowing they need to run the clock out, or you are going to have a chance to WIN the game, not send it to overtime. They saw what your offense just did to their defense. They saw your QB on the sideline screaming and hyping everyone up. Cutting the lead to six put WAY more pressure on the Dolphins offense. You want to hype up your defense? Put them back on the field knowing your offense just did their job. Put them back on the field knowing a stop and a TD wins it. At that point, they aren’t in the mindset of “we need a stop to have a chance to go to OT.” They are thinking, “let’s go out here, get a stop, and give our offense a chance to WIN.” There’s a fundamental difference in playing to WIN and playing NOT to LOSE. This was a decision by a coaching staff that was playing to WIN. Brilliant game by Vrabel and Kelly. Brilliant execution late in the game by the offense and the defense. Completely out-coached one of the best offensive minds in the game. #Titans
0:10

I have not seen enough about the decision from Mike Vrabel and Tim Kelly to go for 2 down by 8 last night. Here’s why I loved it: 1) NFL teams this season have been successful on 55% of two-point conversion attempts. The odds were in the Titans’ favor. 2) Will Levis was dealing in the 2nd half. 3) Titans still had all three timeouts and the two-minute warning. 4) Miami struggled to move the ball on offense all night. Their three scoring drives went for 12, 7, and 59 yards. 5) If successful on the two-point conversion, a stop on defense and a TD wins the game. If unsuccessful, you can still send it to OT. 6) Titans offense marched down the field, scored the TD to make it a one possession game and essentially told Miami, “we are going for two because we know you cannot stop us right now.” The odds are in your favor. It’s a good mathematical decision. You want to psych out an opposing offense? Give them the ball knowing they need to run the clock out, or you are going to have a chance to WIN the game, not send it to overtime. They saw what your offense just did to their defense. They saw your QB on the sideline screaming and hyping everyone up. Cutting the lead to six put WAY more pressure on the Dolphins offense. You want to hype up your defense? Put them back on the field knowing your offense just did their job. Put them back on the field knowing a stop and a TD wins it. At that point, they aren’t in the mindset of “we need a stop to have a chance to go to OT.” They are thinking, “let’s go out here, get a stop, and give our offense a chance to WIN.” There’s a fundamental difference in playing to WIN and playing NOT to LOSE. This was a decision by a coaching staff that was playing to WIN. Brilliant game by Vrabel and Kelly. Brilliant execution late in the game by the offense and the defense. Completely out-coached one of the best offensive minds in the game. #Titans

Jake!

36,853 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

🗣 QUINTEN MOORE WITH THE PLAY OF HIS LIFE 🗣 One of the most underrated plays of the 23-24 season was a touchdown by Quentin Moore that sealed the game against Oregon Quentin and team invite you to join us on April 28th from 2-4pm at Greenlake Park as Washington Football players partner with the AHA Washington
0:27

🗣 QUINTEN MOORE WITH THE PLAY OF HIS LIFE 🗣 One of the most underrated plays of the 23-24 season was a touchdown by Quentin Moore that sealed the game against Oregon Quentin and team invite you to join us on April 28th from 2-4pm at Greenlake Park as Washington Football players partner with the AHA Washington

Montlake Futures

14,566 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

Just a two-star recruit out of Miami, FL, Fernando Mendoza was initially slated to go Yale before switching late to Cal. And after an 8-game starting season in 2023, he emerged as a bonafide NFL QB prospect during the 2024 season. And he enters the Big Ten (now at Indiana Football) and the 2025 #NFLDraft process as a QB Draft fans need to get to know: I’d bet on his continued ascent up boards over the next 10 months. Mendoza’s film last year has a LOT to be excited about, from his pocket navigation, deep ball placement, and high release point allowing him to pinpoint at all three levels with control. But what really jumps out in studying Mendoza: his toughness. He faced ample pressure last year and was as good as any quarterback with pressure in his face and finishing through contact as a passer. On plays where he had less than 2.5 seconds to throw, Mendoza was top-5 in the FBS last year in Completion % (min 250 attempts), behind players like Cam Ward and Shedeur Sanders. As you can see in the plays below, Mendoza has the size/arm talent to complete passes with rushers muddying the pocket and/or hitting him, and the rare placement and control to complete those passes at a high level He’s one of just seven FBS returning starters who faced pressure on 170+ snaps. The QB he’s replacing, Kurtis Rourke, faced pressure on a little less than half of Mendoza’s. Plus, Rourke was among the best in the country on play action last year in the Indiana offense, and Mendoza should benefit greatly: he had a 98.2 QB rating in play action passes last year. If you haven’t get, it’s time to get to know Fernando Mendoza. He’s the next surprising rising QB who crashes the early part of the draft. 👀 #ShrineBowlWhosNext East-West Shrine Bowl
0:14

Just a two-star recruit out of Miami, FL, Fernando Mendoza was initially slated to go Yale before switching late to Cal. And after an 8-game starting season in 2023, he emerged as a bonafide NFL QB prospect during the 2024 season. And he enters the Big Ten (now at Indiana Football) and the 2025 #NFLDraft process as a QB Draft fans need to get to know: I’d bet on his continued ascent up boards over the next 10 months. Mendoza’s film last year has a LOT to be excited about, from his pocket navigation, deep ball placement, and high release point allowing him to pinpoint at all three levels with control. But what really jumps out in studying Mendoza: his toughness. He faced ample pressure last year and was as good as any quarterback with pressure in his face and finishing through contact as a passer. On plays where he had less than 2.5 seconds to throw, Mendoza was top-5 in the FBS last year in Completion % (min 250 attempts), behind players like Cam Ward and Shedeur Sanders. As you can see in the plays below, Mendoza has the size/arm talent to complete passes with rushers muddying the pocket and/or hitting him, and the rare placement and control to complete those passes at a high level He’s one of just seven FBS returning starters who faced pressure on 170+ snaps. The QB he’s replacing, Kurtis Rourke, faced pressure on a little less than half of Mendoza’s. Plus, Rourke was among the best in the country on play action last year in the Indiana offense, and Mendoza should benefit greatly: he had a 98.2 QB rating in play action passes last year. If you haven’t get, it’s time to get to know Fernando Mendoza. He’s the next surprising rising QB who crashes the early part of the draft. 👀 #ShrineBowlWhosNext East-West Shrine Bowl

Eric Galko

53,940 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

"I'm just going to try and fall and see what happens. It worked out." -- Minnesota's Amaya Battle laughing on Cotie McMahon drawing a foul Battle is basically saying she was not fouled by Cotie. Yet, as we saw, Cotie was called for it. One of the very best players in the game, Cotie was only able to play for half of an NCAA tournament game because of this nonsense.
0:18

"I'm just going to try and fall and see what happens. It worked out." -- Minnesota's Amaya Battle laughing on Cotie McMahon drawing a foul Battle is basically saying she was not fouled by Cotie. Yet, as we saw, Cotie was called for it. One of the very best players in the game, Cotie was only able to play for half of an NCAA tournament game because of this nonsense.

The Rebel Walk

335,053 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

This runner at first was caught in a pick off move by the pitcher. Pitcher throws to first and the first baseman fires to second and the umpire calls him out. He looked safe on the play. However, the umpire admits he was safe but said he called him out because the other team was losing 10-0 in the first inning. He said “he was so safe but I just gave it to them.” Basically saying we gotta’ get the game moving right? Fellow umpires, some coaches and parents said they respect the call and why. But many people said you are cheating that one runner by calling him out. They said no matter the score you have to have integrity even if it is 20-0. They said this is why kids grow up disliking umpires and why parents act the way they do. Tough one- I actually understand where he is coming from but if that were your kid, would you want him called out? I say call the game the right way 100% and let it play out the way it is supposed to. How is the other team supposed to get better if you are giving them calls? Do you agree with the umpire and why he did it? Or, are you totally against that and that should never happen?
0:18

This runner at first was caught in a pick off move by the pitcher. Pitcher throws to first and the first baseman fires to second and the umpire calls him out. He looked safe on the play. However, the umpire admits he was safe but said he called him out because the other team was losing 10-0 in the first inning. He said “he was so safe but I just gave it to them.” Basically saying we gotta’ get the game moving right? Fellow umpires, some coaches and parents said they respect the call and why. But many people said you are cheating that one runner by calling him out. They said no matter the score you have to have integrity even if it is 20-0. They said this is why kids grow up disliking umpires and why parents act the way they do. Tough one- I actually understand where he is coming from but if that were your kid, would you want him called out? I say call the game the right way 100% and let it play out the way it is supposed to. How is the other team supposed to get better if you are giving them calls? Do you agree with the umpire and why he did it? Or, are you totally against that and that should never happen?

👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈

44,446 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Following 2 of the dumber play designs of the year, the Eagles end up in 4th and 2. They go empty and the 49ers counter with C0. They know there are 2 things the Eagles like to do from empty: QB run and DeVonta Smith out routes. The C0 blitz stacks the box and helps eliminate the QB run, while the slot corner just sits on the out route. Hurts has to try to throw it, because every other route is just a curl or a vertical route. Not 1 route targeting the middle of the field against C0, and the Eagles turn it over on downs. You can't be that predictable.
0:19

Following 2 of the dumber play designs of the year, the Eagles end up in 4th and 2. They go empty and the 49ers counter with C0. They know there are 2 things the Eagles like to do from empty: QB run and DeVonta Smith out routes. The C0 blitz stacks the box and helps eliminate the QB run, while the slot corner just sits on the out route. Hurts has to try to throw it, because every other route is just a curl or a vertical route. Not 1 route targeting the middle of the field against C0, and the Eagles turn it over on downs. You can't be that predictable.

Shane Haff

30,185 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

3rd and 1 deep shot to Justin Jefferson in single coverage. Kevin O'Connell talked about it on Monday, stating that he wouldn't change the call. "Best receiver in football in a one-on-one with a run call you feel good about on fourth and one. I would not change that call." The lack of running the ball is a very fair criticism, but these are the shots you should be taking
0:11

3rd and 1 deep shot to Justin Jefferson in single coverage. Kevin O'Connell talked about it on Monday, stating that he wouldn't change the call. "Best receiver in football in a one-on-one with a run call you feel good about on fourth and one. I would not change that call." The lack of running the ball is a very fair criticism, but these are the shots you should be taking

Tyler Forness

51,777 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

Your circle is either your power or poison, choose them wisely. This touching scene caught on camera shows a group of young boys enjoying a baseball game together. When a player decided to toss a ball into the stands, all the boys immediately pointed to one of their friends - it was his birthday. The player noticed their gesture and threw the ball straight to him. As the birthday boy caught it, his friends burst into cheers, their faces glowing with pure excitement and joy. It wasn’t just about the ball - it was about friendship, kindness, and the simple magic of childhood. Moments like this remind us that the people around us shape who we are. The right circle will lift you up, celebrate your wins, and find joy in your happiness. The wrong one will quietly drain your light. Your circle can be your strength or your weakness, choose wisely.
0:10

Your circle is either your power or poison, choose them wisely. This touching scene caught on camera shows a group of young boys enjoying a baseball game together. When a player decided to toss a ball into the stands, all the boys immediately pointed to one of their friends - it was his birthday. The player noticed their gesture and threw the ball straight to him. As the birthday boy caught it, his friends burst into cheers, their faces glowing with pure excitement and joy. It wasn’t just about the ball - it was about friendship, kindness, and the simple magic of childhood. Moments like this remind us that the people around us shape who we are. The right circle will lift you up, celebrate your wins, and find joy in your happiness. The wrong one will quietly drain your light. Your circle can be your strength or your weakness, choose wisely.

Restoring Your Faith in Humanity

158,416 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

OK, I have a definitive word on the CJ Abrams play from today's Pittsburgh Pirates at Washington Nationals game after talking with Elias Sports Bureau on this. This play will stay as a sacrifice fly. The originial ruling of NOT a sacrifice fly was for the exact same reason that I thought, which is that the infielder is not running into the outfield, which is year's past would have been correct As it was explained to me, in past years, an infielder had to be running almost in a straight line towards the outfield wall to be considered "running in the outfield". Here, since he is running, and he ends up further away from home (157 feet) than when he started (145 feet), this is going to count as a sacrifice fly. That definition is changing, in part from this play to help bring greater consistency, and to take some of the guesswork out of it (the argument that he is running into the outfield as opposed to more parallel). Now, folks all the time ask "why doesn't MLB publish the OS Manual" and I always say because it is a living document that can have the wording change, and the wording for this play will be modified to something like "more towards the outfield wall than towards home plate" to eliminate any confusion. The big key to this play is that he was running on a full sprint. Also, and this is helpful for me, but for all fly ball outs that score a run, Elias Saba reviews to ensure consistency. So, yes, it's a sacrifice fly, and now that I have that info from Elias themselves, that sort of settles this one. Sounds like the guidelines for this definition will be changing, either this season, or certainly for next season.
0:14

OK, I have a definitive word on the CJ Abrams play from today's Pittsburgh Pirates at Washington Nationals game after talking with Elias Sports Bureau on this. This play will stay as a sacrifice fly. The originial ruling of NOT a sacrifice fly was for the exact same reason that I thought, which is that the infielder is not running into the outfield, which is year's past would have been correct As it was explained to me, in past years, an infielder had to be running almost in a straight line towards the outfield wall to be considered "running in the outfield". Here, since he is running, and he ends up further away from home (157 feet) than when he started (145 feet), this is going to count as a sacrifice fly. That definition is changing, in part from this play to help bring greater consistency, and to take some of the guesswork out of it (the argument that he is running into the outfield as opposed to more parallel). Now, folks all the time ask "why doesn't MLB publish the OS Manual" and I always say because it is a living document that can have the wording change, and the wording for this play will be modified to something like "more towards the outfield wall than towards home plate" to eliminate any confusion. The big key to this play is that he was running on a full sprint. Also, and this is helpful for me, but for all fly ball outs that score a run, Elias Saba reviews to ensure consistency. So, yes, it's a sacrifice fly, and now that I have that info from Elias themselves, that sort of settles this one. Sounds like the guidelines for this definition will be changing, either this season, or certainly for next season.

MLB Scoring Changes

49,141 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce