Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

It's not reasonable to hyper focus on outlier negative reviews when the aggregate for Indiana Jones and The Great Circle is high (Greg gave it a 6.5, Parris a 7, but Meta is 86). But the comments here are interesting and mimic even positive reviews on how its story... not gameplay, is the focus. First Hellblade 2, now Indiana Jones. #Xbox is seemingly leaning heavier into cinematic or "movie" like games than #PlayStation this year lol. If anything, these games are far less gameplay focused than PlayStation's tentpole cinematic games. Mind you, the movie game term itself is largely used by fanboys in a demeaning manner. I hope all those who for years criticised or disliked these types of games, keep it consistent lol. As someone who often favours these types of experiences, it has me more, not less hyped. #Xbox #GamePass Credit to James for the video.show more

NIB

7,520 subscribers

57,249 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

11 Comments

KidSmoove1 year ago

Are you serious? I played Indiana Jones for 30 plus hours where does this game lack gameplay? Dafuq

NIB1 year ago

How mechanically competent and challenging is the gameplay? All games have gameplay, even actual cinematic walking sims like Detroit, Hellblade 2 or Heavy Rain. It's a question of how complex, refined or challenging gameplay is. These guys felt gameplay was less comprehensive.

that 🥷🏾 you love to hate1 year ago

I personally think Xbox games get a pass for shit other games get dinged for. it’s bizarre. does this read like an 8.5/10: “Indiana Jones and the Great Circle is far from perfect, especially because of a lot of dated elements and a rigidity.” was this the motivation for the 9/10 score from a different outlet? “This is exactly what Xbox needs: a solid single-player game with its own unique identity.” why would Xbox need a multiplatform license game? reads like a pity bump.

AltShiftKill1 year ago

I'm not sure what you are trying to say

NIB1 year ago

I'm saying two of Xbox's best exclusives this year, are the kind of cinematic "movie" games many Xbox/PC fans used to criticise and hate lol.

LIL MAYNE1 year ago

Sony is talked about negatively for their “movie games” not because other platforms don’t enjoy them but because that is the majority of their content. They didn’t have any solid shooters, platformers or smaller games releasing for a while. You know, variety.

NIB1 year ago

That's just fanboy ignorance and propaganda though, as they've had variety too. Sackboy Astro's Playroom Astro Bot Demon's Souls Destruction All-stars Ratchet and Clank Rift Apart Returnal Gran Turismo 7 Stellar Blade Helldivers 2

Pauls Gaming Live1 year ago

sorry, to tell you but... Indiana Jones and The Great Circle is based on the movie franchise called Indiana Jones.... Right? So the game being a Movie game... hint hint makes sense

Kutdown on Gaming 🇺🇸🇯🇲🏀🎮🗽👟1 year ago

They missed the mark making it 1st person

Brian Cooper 🙅🏾‍♂️1 year ago

Got jump by 10 mf in Indiana Jones can't beat them 😭 avoiding fights necessary when stamina runs out lmao

NIB1 year ago

Is there an early access version or something?

Related Videos

Alex from Digital Foundry is doubtful about GTA 6 Trailer 2 "Gameplay" aspect and what Rockstar Games means by it, he wouldn't allow other developers call it gameplay, because of the 20 by 9 aspect ratio? In my opinion, Its not like we haven't seen these cinematic style shot settings in previous R* Games like RDR2 which allowed you to hold the switch camera button to add black bars to your current Gameplay to make it more cinematic. I don't see how that changes the statement of "entirely in-game from a PlayStation 5, comprised of equal parts gameplay and cutscenes" if these shots are captured in a more stylish way to promote a Trailer Video

Alex from Digital Foundry is doubtful about GTA 6 Trailer 2 "Gameplay" aspect and what Rockstar Games means by it, he wouldn't allow other developers call it gameplay, because of the 20 by 9 aspect ratio? In my opinion, Its not like we haven't seen these cinematic style shot settings in previous R* Games like RDR2 which allowed you to hold the switch camera button to add black bars to your current Gameplay to make it more cinematic. I don't see how that changes the statement of "entirely in-game from a PlayStation 5, comprised of equal parts gameplay and cutscenes" if these shots are captured in a more stylish way to promote a Trailer Video

NikTek

180,803 views • 1 year ago

Played SAROS for a few hours, impressions: - Gameplay is phenomenal, as good as it gets basically for 3rd person shooters - It looks and runs perfectly - Sound design is God tier - They implemented more story than Returnal, more interactions in the hub - You can upgrade stuff permanently which leads to different types of styles - Bosses are awesome - Each run is a lot of fun, this is really COME BACK STRONGER Honestly if you like gameplay games this is for you, this is for sure a game of the year contender without a doubt 🔥

Played SAROS for a few hours, impressions: - Gameplay is phenomenal, as good as it gets basically for 3rd person shooters - It looks and runs perfectly - Sound design is God tier - They implemented more story than Returnal, more interactions in the hub - You can upgrade stuff permanently which leads to different types of styles - Bosses are awesome - Each run is a lot of fun, this is really COME BACK STRONGER Honestly if you like gameplay games this is for you, this is for sure a game of the year contender without a doubt 🔥

Pyo 5️⃣

109,287 views • 3 months ago

Zach Cregger says he refuses to "cannibalize" the Resident Evil games or try to improve on Leon in his new movie "What I'm not doing in this is I'm not gonna cannibalize the characters and the stories that the games already do so well." "Because I'm not gonna be able to improve on Leon. I feel like Leon exists in the games." "And anyone I cast, and any haircut I give him, or any line of dialogue I make him say is just not gonna be Leon, because Leon exists." "I'd rather tell an original story that lives in the world of the games, that obeys the rules of the games largely, but feels more like the experience you get when you're playing the games." "That is leaning into the survival horror aspect of it, not survival action. I really love where they build this incredible atmosphere and this dread and tension as you progress through these set pieces."

Zach Cregger says he refuses to "cannibalize" the Resident Evil games or try to improve on Leon in his new movie "What I'm not doing in this is I'm not gonna cannibalize the characters and the stories that the games already do so well." "Because I'm not gonna be able to improve on Leon. I feel like Leon exists in the games." "And anyone I cast, and any haircut I give him, or any line of dialogue I make him say is just not gonna be Leon, because Leon exists." "I'd rather tell an original story that lives in the world of the games, that obeys the rules of the games largely, but feels more like the experience you get when you're playing the games." "That is leaning into the survival horror aspect of it, not survival action. I really love where they build this incredible atmosphere and this dread and tension as you progress through these set pieces."

fortunate

609,786 views • 26 days ago

One criticism I always see towards games like Red Dead Redemption 2 and Grand Theft Auto VI recently is the topic of small details. "Why does a game need so many details, it doesn't make the experience any better and takes longer to develop" While I do agree with the fact that Rockstar Games development schedules in between each release keep getting longer, the fact is that when you aim for such a high level of realism in a video-game, its not about graphics anymore, its about immersion. I'm sure that if you played RDR2, you know that your horse sweating or its balls shrinking in the cold don't add much to the gameplay itself, but it makes the game feel like its real. This is precisely what sets apart Rockstar Games from other game studios, the level of immersion you get in those games is unbeaten. RDR2, a game designed for the PS4 console has a level of fluidity and immersion that I have yet to see in a video-game from any other game studio, each game mechanic seems to work flawlessly that it feels like a living and breathing open world game. Hell, sometimes you feel bad for shooting an NPC which never happened to me in a video-game before. When you're playing it, hours can go by and you don't even. In other open-world games, sometimes you can notice limitations, for example the same NPCs appearing in one object or the same scripted conversations. RDR2 manages to make that gap of a video-game and reality feel thinner, not get rid of it entirely of course. Making such a massive game filled with tons of details means that it can be can be played for multiple years after its release and not feel outdated. Its not all about details of course, when a game takes so long to develop, the stakes get higher each time and Rockstar Games has to make sure that they deliver on the story that is being told too, hence the reason why their games have always been historically good in terms of writing. Now to address the elephant int he room, the main issue is that as the complexity increases for each new release and optimizing all of these systems to work in tandem, the development time increases and we get longer periods of waiting. Is all of this worth it? In my opinion, yes. Its Rockstar Games after all, they have the budget necessary and the talent to achieve this kind of feat. Not only does it raise the bar for what is possible to do in a video-game, but it also is highly rewarding when you play the game for the first time and its unlike anything you've seen these past couple of years. When I finished playing Red Dead Redemption 2 for the first time, every new game that came out felt outdated for me. Just as technology keeps going forward, the same applies here with open world games too. What are your thoughts on this topic?

One criticism I always see towards games like Red Dead Redemption 2 and Grand Theft Auto VI recently is the topic of small details. "Why does a game need so many details, it doesn't make the experience any better and takes longer to develop" While I do agree with the fact that Rockstar Games development schedules in between each release keep getting longer, the fact is that when you aim for such a high level of realism in a video-game, its not about graphics anymore, its about immersion. I'm sure that if you played RDR2, you know that your horse sweating or its balls shrinking in the cold don't add much to the gameplay itself, but it makes the game feel like its real. This is precisely what sets apart Rockstar Games from other game studios, the level of immersion you get in those games is unbeaten. RDR2, a game designed for the PS4 console has a level of fluidity and immersion that I have yet to see in a video-game from any other game studio, each game mechanic seems to work flawlessly that it feels like a living and breathing open world game. Hell, sometimes you feel bad for shooting an NPC which never happened to me in a video-game before. When you're playing it, hours can go by and you don't even. In other open-world games, sometimes you can notice limitations, for example the same NPCs appearing in one object or the same scripted conversations. RDR2 manages to make that gap of a video-game and reality feel thinner, not get rid of it entirely of course. Making such a massive game filled with tons of details means that it can be can be played for multiple years after its release and not feel outdated. Its not all about details of course, when a game takes so long to develop, the stakes get higher each time and Rockstar Games has to make sure that they deliver on the story that is being told too, hence the reason why their games have always been historically good in terms of writing. Now to address the elephant int he room, the main issue is that as the complexity increases for each new release and optimizing all of these systems to work in tandem, the development time increases and we get longer periods of waiting. Is all of this worth it? In my opinion, yes. Its Rockstar Games after all, they have the budget necessary and the talent to achieve this kind of feat. Not only does it raise the bar for what is possible to do in a video-game, but it also is highly rewarding when you play the game for the first time and its unlike anything you've seen these past couple of years. When I finished playing Red Dead Redemption 2 for the first time, every new game that came out felt outdated for me. Just as technology keeps going forward, the same applies here with open world games too. What are your thoughts on this topic?

NikTek

26,848 views • 5 days ago

Hello Jamie Moran This is your exposure 😊 I'll admit you do play and finish many games.... alot more than the average person. Your gamerscore is impressive but you are a walking advert fraud for xbox most of the time This is your gamertag Souljay87 You recommend to people on here many games but you have barely touched, you hype gamepass titles you barely touch. You hype up microsoft console exclusives but barely touched. Even last few months claim you LOVE JRPG's.... but in the 12 years of your Xbox profile. You have onky finished 1 JRPG game. Final Fantasy XV Look at even the video I posted, all that talk for Hellblade 2... but you haven't even finished either of the Hellblade games 🤦🏻‍♂️ You're abit of a gaming fraud aren't you Like can you not be real and show your own personal experience rather than look A.I 😊😊

kjngamer

40,103 views • 1 year ago

✨ The 🟢 Vibe Portal 2026 is now officially live! It adds a green circular ring portal to every #vibejam game that players can walk, swim, jump, drive, sail or fly through and get teleported to any of the other 1000+ games It's like a mini meta verse for vibe coded games to teleport through Last year it was a bit buggy because me and s13k had to manually manage all the games added and games would start 404'ing quickly This year it works differently and is fully automated: the Vibe Portal tracks which games send traffic to other games, and based on that sends traffic back to them, so automatically if a game doesn't send traffic, it knows either it doesn't have a portal or the portal is not working (like the last fish game in this video) or not shown properly in the game. And it tracks which games the user already visited so doesn't show them again and again, so you always end up in a new game (until you run out) Instructions how to add it to your game on the new Vibejam website at also the new domain 🎮 Adding it is optional to participate in the #vibejam but I recommend it because it will get you lots of traffic from other games! You can try it here:

✨ The 🟢 Vibe Portal 2026 is now officially live! It adds a green circular ring portal to every #vibejam game that players can walk, swim, jump, drive, sail or fly through and get teleported to any of the other 1000+ games It's like a mini meta verse for vibe coded games to teleport through Last year it was a bit buggy because me and s13k had to manually manage all the games added and games would start 404'ing quickly This year it works differently and is fully automated: the Vibe Portal tracks which games send traffic to other games, and based on that sends traffic back to them, so automatically if a game doesn't send traffic, it knows either it doesn't have a portal or the portal is not working (like the last fish game in this video) or not shown properly in the game. And it tracks which games the user already visited so doesn't show them again and again, so you always end up in a new game (until you run out) Instructions how to add it to your game on the new Vibejam website at also the new domain 🎮 Adding it is optional to participate in the #vibejam but I recommend it because it will get you lots of traffic from other games! You can try it here:

@levelsio

94,887 views • 4 months ago

A cinematic artist in the gaming industry gave harsh critiques of this Halo Campaign Evolved cinematic on LinkedIn: “It's hard to believe that this Cinematic for one of gaming's most iconic levels is what Halo Studios is shipping, but it appears to be. From the original 18-second cinematic, which had: -A great establishing shot, showing the scale of the area, reinforcing the rings grand architecture -Sleeping grunts, foreshadowing upcoming ambush gameplay (you're making a game, remember?) -A quick gag of the grunts running scared We now have a bloated 30-second cinematic of: -A more constrained establishing shot. -Doorway framing, a cinematic language of its own not appropriate for a scene like this -Grunts awkwardly... arguing? Standing around? Flailing their arms? What are they even doing? Why are we watching them do this for so long? -A stupid compression-effect shot on the grunt, so clearly made by someone just ITCHING to make a shot like this -Inappropriate for Halo, an enemy, and for a character who you cant even see the face of. -The cherry on top is the fully disconnected lighting between the cinematic and the gameplay space as the cinematic ends Stuff like this needs to be rightly criticized, and all the more for remakes, which should have none of the confusion and cross-department bickering as new games might. You're remaking a game. You know the space. You know the story. You should know the intent.”

A cinematic artist in the gaming industry gave harsh critiques of this Halo Campaign Evolved cinematic on LinkedIn: “It's hard to believe that this Cinematic for one of gaming's most iconic levels is what Halo Studios is shipping, but it appears to be. From the original 18-second cinematic, which had: -A great establishing shot, showing the scale of the area, reinforcing the rings grand architecture -Sleeping grunts, foreshadowing upcoming ambush gameplay (you're making a game, remember?) -A quick gag of the grunts running scared We now have a bloated 30-second cinematic of: -A more constrained establishing shot. -Doorway framing, a cinematic language of its own not appropriate for a scene like this -Grunts awkwardly... arguing? Standing around? Flailing their arms? What are they even doing? Why are we watching them do this for so long? -A stupid compression-effect shot on the grunt, so clearly made by someone just ITCHING to make a shot like this -Inappropriate for Halo, an enemy, and for a character who you cant even see the face of. -The cherry on top is the fully disconnected lighting between the cinematic and the gameplay space as the cinematic ends Stuff like this needs to be rightly criticized, and all the more for remakes, which should have none of the confusion and cross-department bickering as new games might. You're remaking a game. You know the space. You know the story. You should know the intent.”

Rebs Gaming

308,898 views • 2 months ago

🚨 NOW: Speaker Johnson just dropped this chilling line to every American to block the rise of COMMUNISM "This is not a GAME! Everybody needs to understand these crazy little Mamdanis who are popping up all around the country — they are a DANGER to you and your family. This is not a GAME!" "If they promise you free stuff, there is far more beneath those promises that even some of these people do not understand themselves." "And so we are here as the Republican Party to stand on the founding principles of the greatest nation in the history of the world. It is our duty to do that." "And we're doing it on behalf of all of you, even the journalists who don't agree with our policies all the time." "You better agree on these principles because that's what keeps you free." "By the way, it's what keeps the press free, okay? This is essential for your well-being and your family. This is not a game." "This is not our Father's Democrat Party. This is not, we're not arguing our marginal tax rates anymore. We're arguing whether or not freedom is going to survive!" Speaker Mike Johnson

🚨 NOW: Speaker Johnson just dropped this chilling line to every American to block the rise of COMMUNISM "This is not a GAME! Everybody needs to understand these crazy little Mamdanis who are popping up all around the country — they are a DANGER to you and your family. This is not a GAME!" "If they promise you free stuff, there is far more beneath those promises that even some of these people do not understand themselves." "And so we are here as the Republican Party to stand on the founding principles of the greatest nation in the history of the world. It is our duty to do that." "And we're doing it on behalf of all of you, even the journalists who don't agree with our policies all the time." "You better agree on these principles because that's what keeps you free." "By the way, it's what keeps the press free, okay? This is essential for your well-being and your family. This is not a game." "This is not our Father's Democrat Party. This is not, we're not arguing our marginal tax rates anymore. We're arguing whether or not freedom is going to survive!" Speaker Mike Johnson

Eric Daugherty

670,632 views • 1 month ago

Pragmata Review | No spoilers That is it for me. I played more than 30 hours of Pragmata and I am really happy that not only we finally got this game after so many delays and in a time where cancellations are common, but also that it turned out to be a very solid and enjoyable experience. Visually it is beautiful, and gameplay wise it works well for the length it has. It is not a long game, which I personally prefer, and I hope we see more titles like this instead of games trying to be longer just for the sake of it. I would not call it short like some people did, but I think it is exactly as long as it needs to be. Story wise, it is my favorite of the year so far. Seeing this kind of father and daughter dynamic again made me want to play more games with similar themes. I did almost everything in the game and I absolutely recommend it. If you are unsure about the length, maybe wait for a sale, but quality wise it deserves to be up there. I am not someone who rushes, so it took me longer because I admire the environments, take screenshots, record videos, and try to find collectibles without guides. For someone who just plays straight through, I think it would take around 12 to 15 hours, maybe a bit more or less. This is the kind of experience I want to see more often in the gaming space. I liked the combat and I think the enemy variety is fine for the length. If the game was longer without adding new enemy types, it would probably feel repetitive, but for what it is, it works. My biggest concern before playing was the combination of Hugh’s shooting and Diana’s hacking. If it was too complicated, it would be annoying, and if it was too simple, it would be boring. Thankfully, it ended up being exactly right. My only real complaint is that you need to return to the base to restock items, and when you die, the game sends you back there instead of placing you right before the area or at the last travel point you unlocked. It is not a huge issue, but it breaks the flow a bit. Diana is very cute and does her part extremely well, and Hugh is a character that is hard not to like. They both nail the dad simulator vibe. The voice acting is great, especially for Diana. Capcom delivered a unique and impressive new IP, which is always welcome in an industry where big publishers mostly rely on established franchises instead of taking risks. Whether we get more entries in the future is up to them, but it is also up to us to support games like this if we want more of them. On PC the game runs very well. The only thing that felt a bit underwhelming to me is the ray tracing when you use it on its own without path tracing. In some areas it does not add much, similar to what I noticed in Resident Evil Requiem. It makes me think it is either something with the RE Engine or simply that Capcom does not push ray tracing that far and focuses more on path tracing instead. Path tracing looks incredible, but of course it comes with a heavy performance cost. Something that impressed me throughout the entire playthrough is how consistent the game feels from start to finish. There is no point where it suddenly drops in quality or feels rushed. Every area has its own atmosphere, the pacing stays steady, and the game never tries to drag itself out longer than needed. It is rare to play something that stays this steady all the way through, and that alone made the whole experience even more enjoyable for me. I hope we get a DLC or a sequel one day, but even if this stays a one off, I am happy with what we got. Rating: 9/10

Pragmata Review | No spoilers That is it for me. I played more than 30 hours of Pragmata and I am really happy that not only we finally got this game after so many delays and in a time where cancellations are common, but also that it turned out to be a very solid and enjoyable experience. Visually it is beautiful, and gameplay wise it works well for the length it has. It is not a long game, which I personally prefer, and I hope we see more titles like this instead of games trying to be longer just for the sake of it. I would not call it short like some people did, but I think it is exactly as long as it needs to be. Story wise, it is my favorite of the year so far. Seeing this kind of father and daughter dynamic again made me want to play more games with similar themes. I did almost everything in the game and I absolutely recommend it. If you are unsure about the length, maybe wait for a sale, but quality wise it deserves to be up there. I am not someone who rushes, so it took me longer because I admire the environments, take screenshots, record videos, and try to find collectibles without guides. For someone who just plays straight through, I think it would take around 12 to 15 hours, maybe a bit more or less. This is the kind of experience I want to see more often in the gaming space. I liked the combat and I think the enemy variety is fine for the length. If the game was longer without adding new enemy types, it would probably feel repetitive, but for what it is, it works. My biggest concern before playing was the combination of Hugh’s shooting and Diana’s hacking. If it was too complicated, it would be annoying, and if it was too simple, it would be boring. Thankfully, it ended up being exactly right. My only real complaint is that you need to return to the base to restock items, and when you die, the game sends you back there instead of placing you right before the area or at the last travel point you unlocked. It is not a huge issue, but it breaks the flow a bit. Diana is very cute and does her part extremely well, and Hugh is a character that is hard not to like. They both nail the dad simulator vibe. The voice acting is great, especially for Diana. Capcom delivered a unique and impressive new IP, which is always welcome in an industry where big publishers mostly rely on established franchises instead of taking risks. Whether we get more entries in the future is up to them, but it is also up to us to support games like this if we want more of them. On PC the game runs very well. The only thing that felt a bit underwhelming to me is the ray tracing when you use it on its own without path tracing. In some areas it does not add much, similar to what I noticed in Resident Evil Requiem. It makes me think it is either something with the RE Engine or simply that Capcom does not push ray tracing that far and focuses more on path tracing instead. Path tracing looks incredible, but of course it comes with a heavy performance cost. Something that impressed me throughout the entire playthrough is how consistent the game feels from start to finish. There is no point where it suddenly drops in quality or feels rushed. Every area has its own atmosphere, the pacing stays steady, and the game never tries to drag itself out longer than needed. It is rare to play something that stays this steady all the way through, and that alone made the whole experience even more enjoyable for me. I hope we get a DLC or a sequel one day, but even if this stays a one off, I am happy with what we got. Rating: 9/10

𝑨𝒔𝒉𝒆𝒏 𝑶𝒏𝒆

32,822 views • 3 months ago

Sony is the last entity I’d want to defend, for all the mess they’ve caused this generation and in the last 2 months especially🚀 But to be fair, what games are even innovating anything? Souls-likes? Open world? Shooter? All copy paste Since PS3 era and not a single game other than maybe Death Stranding, managed to try something new or even as good as PS1-PS3 games in terms of fun, truly interactive and engaging gameplay. This is hardly a Wolverine issue🕹️

Sony is the last entity I’d want to defend, for all the mess they’ve caused this generation and in the last 2 months especially🚀 But to be fair, what games are even innovating anything? Souls-likes? Open world? Shooter? All copy paste Since PS3 era and not a single game other than maybe Death Stranding, managed to try something new or even as good as PS1-PS3 games in terms of fun, truly interactive and engaging gameplay. This is hardly a Wolverine issue🕹️

Rino🚀

27,608 views • 7 days ago

So all of you guys know, the earlier video was not hidden cause I didn't stand by the video or the tweet. It was a concern for the algorithm and wanting my youtube main page to stay focused on pure gameplay stuff. So now here it is, not to be deleted, on twitter. Tear into it if you like, but I wanted you to know the logic behind the privating the video.

So all of you guys know, the earlier video was not hidden cause I didn't stand by the video or the tweet. It was a concern for the algorithm and wanting my youtube main page to stay focused on pure gameplay stuff. So now here it is, not to be deleted, on twitter. Tear into it if you like, but I wanted you to know the logic behind the privating the video.

David Jaffe

33,359 views • 9 months ago

Gavin Baker says AI will make video games 90% cheaper to make "In the short term, AI is going to be amazing for the video game platforms. I think AI's impact on video games has been very misunderstood. AI world models are going to lower the cost of developing a game by 90%." "If it used to cost $300 million to make a AAA title like Call of Duty, or $200 million or $100 million or whatever the number is, it goes down 90%." "This might end up being really bad for companies that make video games, because you're going to have a lot more competition. But if you were a video game platform, and we all know what those platforms are, this is going to be really good for you, because there's going to be an explosion of content."

Gavin Baker says AI will make video games 90% cheaper to make "In the short term, AI is going to be amazing for the video game platforms. I think AI's impact on video games has been very misunderstood. AI world models are going to lower the cost of developing a game by 90%." "If it used to cost $300 million to make a AAA title like Call of Duty, or $200 million or $100 million or whatever the number is, it goes down 90%." "This might end up being really bad for companies that make video games, because you're going to have a lot more competition. But if you were a video game platform, and we all know what those platforms are, this is going to be really good for you, because there's going to be an explosion of content."

dnap

218,282 views • 1 month ago

The first thing players mention when first coming in the league is how much faster the gsme is compared to college. Coming off a 30 point gsme asked Reed if the gsme has slowed down for him this year. “A lot of its confidence but getting comfortable the NBA a totally different game than highschool and college. It definitely took some time but these last couple of games and all year everything has definitely slowed down.”

The first thing players mention when first coming in the league is how much faster the gsme is compared to college. Coming off a 30 point gsme asked Reed if the gsme has slowed down for him this year. “A lot of its confidence but getting comfortable the NBA a totally different game than highschool and college. It definitely took some time but these last couple of games and all year everything has definitely slowed down.”

Lachard Binkley

49,746 views • 5 months ago

NEW: WNBA coach says it's time to "take action" against people throwing s*x toys on the court during games, says "we're not the butt of the joke." Lynx coach Cheryl Reeve is demanding accountability and says the stunts are not funny. "This has been going on for centuries ... it is not funny, and it should not be the butt of jokes on any radio show, or in print, or in any comments." "The s*xualization of women is what is used to hold women down. And this is no different." "These people who are doing this should be held accountable. We’re not the butt of the joke. They are the problem, and we need to take action." Video: Shelby Swanson

NEW: WNBA coach says it's time to "take action" against people throwing sx toys on the court during games, says "we're not the butt of the joke." Lynx coach Cheryl Reeve is demanding accountability and says the stunts are not funny. "This has been going on for centuries ... it is not funny, and it should not be the butt of jokes on any radio show, or in print, or in any comments." "The sxualization of women is what is used to hold women down. And this is no different." "These people who are doing this should be held accountable. We’re not the butt of the joke. They are the problem, and we need to take action." Video: Shelby Swanson

Collin Rugg

621,855 views • 1 year ago

I get he cracks a fortnite dance or makes a pop culture reference but for every one of those, you get one of these really like actually touching moments. Thing is the purpose of movie sonic is the same purpose sonic has in the games. He changes everyone around him. (they do it in a different way of course but as far as narrative purpose its the same ball park)

I get he cracks a fortnite dance or makes a pop culture reference but for every one of those, you get one of these really like actually touching moments. Thing is the purpose of movie sonic is the same purpose sonic has in the games. He changes everyone around him. (they do it in a different way of course but as far as narrative purpose its the same ball park)

✨DJ Warner🔮

199,893 views • 5 months ago

Statistics and data show exclusive games have a far higher likelihood of being higher quality and/or more graphically and technically impressive, relative to the very low volume of releases they make up vs multi-platform games. This doesn't mean exclusives can't be and aren't often bad. Nor that multi-platform games can't be or aren't often better than exclusives, just that exclusivity (inc console and timed) greatly increases the likelihood of higher quality. Despite making up less than 10% of overall releases (see video for context and details), exclusives make up; +The majority of the highest rated games ever made. +The majority of the most Game of the Year Awarded games the last 13 years. +The overwhelming majority of tech and graphics awards winners, by arguably the most prestigious institutions in the field. This isn't a coincidence, as developers themselves keep reminding us. It's because exclusives greatly benefit from single platform focus, and design, development, optimisation, studios, teams, budgets, resources, testing and time, not having to instead be spread far thinner, across many platforms. This doesn't mean all games need to be or should be exclusive. Few games are, and that's fine. But some exclusives existing to push the boundaries of single platform development, tech and design focus, as well as increasing competition in general, is ultimately a great and pro-consumer thing. At least if you're a consumer who values the pursuit of higher potential quality, over accessibility. #PS5 #Xbox #Nintendo #Switch2

Statistics and data show exclusive games have a far higher likelihood of being higher quality and/or more graphically and technically impressive, relative to the very low volume of releases they make up vs multi-platform games. This doesn't mean exclusives can't be and aren't often bad. Nor that multi-platform games can't be or aren't often better than exclusives, just that exclusivity (inc console and timed) greatly increases the likelihood of higher quality. Despite making up less than 10% of overall releases (see video for context and details), exclusives make up; +The majority of the highest rated games ever made. +The majority of the most Game of the Year Awarded games the last 13 years. +The overwhelming majority of tech and graphics awards winners, by arguably the most prestigious institutions in the field. This isn't a coincidence, as developers themselves keep reminding us. It's because exclusives greatly benefit from single platform focus, and design, development, optimisation, studios, teams, budgets, resources, testing and time, not having to instead be spread far thinner, across many platforms. This doesn't mean all games need to be or should be exclusive. Few games are, and that's fine. But some exclusives existing to push the boundaries of single platform development, tech and design focus, as well as increasing competition in general, is ultimately a great and pro-consumer thing. At least if you're a consumer who values the pursuit of higher potential quality, over accessibility. #PS5 #Xbox #Nintendo #Switch2

NIB

12,923 views • 1 year ago