Video yükleniyor...
Video Yüklenemedi
🚨 It's shocking how many people go through chemo and radiation only to eventually die from the treatment — not the cancer itself. Sergeant Ric Schiff, a San Francisco police officer, told this heartbreaking story in court: One of his twin daughters Crystin was diagnosed with a brain tumor... show more
42,319 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce •via X (Twitter)
35 Yorum
That’s true. It’s usually treatments that kill us quicker.
Sadly true.
We are getting exposed to other forms of therapy for cancer that aren't toxic- like ivermectin and febendazole, a strict keto diet, fasting. When folks are given more choices- more of them will feel comfortable using the alternative treatments instead of the toxic ones.
If the cancer is mitigated or goes into remission they claim, "See, our cancer treatment worked!". But over 90% of the time the patient dies. Then they blame the patients death on the "cancer". No one questions the poisons because, "cancer". They have a rigged system of fraud and murder.
There are so many alternative treatments that back up the science on how cancer works and how to stop it from growing and/or eliminate it altogether - The cancer industry is so profitable that they won't bother with the newly found ways to treat cancer which don't kill all the good cells in our bodies - If they can't make billions, they are not interested.
Sickening
Dr Burzynski,a nationally and internationally recognized physician/investigator, pioneered the use of biologically active peptides for the treatment of cancer. In 1967, at the age of 24-
Neighbor just got taken off chemo after a year of torture..they've put her on fentynal, oxytocin and morphine to finish her off. She's 80 she was feeling dizzy..she's a vegetarian she needed iron, low iron makes you dizzy. First thing they did was pump her full of iron so she could go on chemo. She would've been just fine if they'd stopped there.
As a survivor of Chemo and radiation therapy this makes me angry.
Sadly, he is right. The natural cures for cancer have been hidden. Chemo and Radiation are deadly.
Everyone should ask ask how many have survived chemo treatments after 10 years,zero in my family🌻
Complete and utter lies from you. Again. Who pays you to lie?
Yes I never did think this was a solution. There will be better alternative cures. Of course that doesn’t make money for the pharma companies. But with all the money that went into cancer charities, I never did understand why we didn’t have a cure even yet. There will be better natural remedies. This needs changing.
Hospitals' highest profit is chemo.
@mollie_don I will take ivermectin menbendazol vit c
One of many compelling stories in an amazing documentary called Burzynski. The story is unbelievable and every American should see this to understand the state of affairs in healthcare and government.
Very sad!😢
My daddy was diagnosed with cancer of an unknown primary in May if 2005. By August he was dead. The chemo did him in. I didn’t know anything about alternatives back then but I often wonder if I had known, would he be here today!
The CURE for Cancer has been out for decades. Most Oncologists are USELESS and just follow the BULL$HIT treatment they were taught in school. ALL driven by big Pharma.
There are always alternative treatments.
I know a guy who refused chemo and the next day was run over by a truck. 1000 anecdotes do not = a study.
My husband died of cancer treatment, not cancer.
This is heartbreaking. 💔
It’s not shocking at all, the reality is it’s the only option offered by most white coats because they are incentivized to use that option …… it’s commonplace and unfortunately the state of affairs in medicine ….. ITS CRIMINAL AND PATHETIC !
wasn't mustard gas used on our enemies in wars?
I have known many who died from the treatment!
Quick question, where did you go to medical school?
America's healthcare is NOT healthcare. It's Profit Care for a criminal mafia disguised as healthcare!
also... I'm pretty sure you voted for a child rapist...
Why we as a modern nation continue to use a treatment derived from mustard gas, with a 97% failure rate is beyond me. Oh, wait! I think I know! It’s big money for Big Pharma, and the treating oncologist gets to profit by about $4,000!
Children vaccines put the cancer in. Treatment kills or creates a sick patient they make more money off of Chemo is musterd gas, just like the Nazis used in the camps.
Just one more example of how unimportant we are to their system, oh, except our dollars. They value that very highly!
Burzynski was taken to court 7 times by either Federal or State agencies. He was not guilty every single time. He kept treating patients despite the legal fees. Never should have been allowed in a free country what they did to him. He's a hero.
@FirstAmend75255 What a heartbreaking story.
Yet another pathetic attempt to use anecdote in place of data.
![🚨Big problem! Dr. Suzanne Humphries: "Here's the real sucker punch... the Covid jabs lead to increased cancer susceptibility... but SV40-associated cancer won't respond well... to chemotherapy... [in fact,] radiation makes SV40 cancer far more aggressive...." This clip of Dr. Humphries (Dr Suzanne Humphries), a medical doctor, board-certified internist, nephrologist, and co-author of Dissolving Illusions, is taken from a presentation posted to the Children's Health Defense (Children’s Health Defense) Rumble channel on November 12, 2025. ---------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "And here's the real sucker punch. So you remember how SV40 knocks out that p53 gene and protein, which I talked to you before, the cancer suppressor. And that means that not only can the Covid jabs lead to increased cancer susceptibility, right? But SV40-associated cancer won't respond well at all to chemotherapy. "And conventional cancer treatments are likely to make cancer actually go wild and not regress because p53, it actually directs cancer cells to die off. It's necessary for chemo and especially for radiation to do the killing that they're supposed to be doing. And the fact that radiation makes SV40 cancer far more aggressive is the entire reason it was used in the Get Castro project, right? You know, radiating the animals first and then doing the gain of function with radiation. That's why they did it. "So you know, this is some older material, just to show you that they've known for a long time that SV40 blocks the effect of cancer treatments. And so there have been children who have died of SV40-related brain tumors. And the parents go and they do research. And this is what they have found. And so these are articles from like 1997. "So again, this is not something that top scientists should have bypassed. So the other brain cancers and solid cancers have been found to contain the SV40. And that the SV40 binds with the tumor-suppressor gene at p53, and it actually stops those tumor cells from undergoing what's called apoptosis, A-P-O-P-T-O-S-I-S, which really means programmed cell death. And that's how you're able to get cancer to regress, you know, when you're doing whatever you're doing traditionally. "Like, even if it's like, look, we know radiation does make tumor cells regress. Do they come back later? Most of the time, yes, they do cancer, you know, chemotherapy. Like, my father got chemotherapy when he had tumors all over his body. We got nine extra months with him, so I was okay with that. But did they all come back to kill him? Yes, they did, but I got an extra nine months. "But the point being that, you get that programmed cell death. But then if there's a P— If it's an SV40-related cancer especially, you're going to wind up with probably a turbo cancer at that point. "Yeah, I'm just going to read this to you because when I said that people knew about this and there were, you know, parents of children who developed brain tumors and testified in front of Congress. This was one of the very well-educated parents. Exposing SV40-positive cancer cells to chemo and radiation does not kill the cells, but simply creates more genetic mutations, making the cancer more aggressive. The bottom line is that SV40 causes human cancer, stops orthodox cancer treatments like chemo and radiation from providing any benefit and can make the cancer even more aggressive."](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1995343450158547189/amplify_video_thumb/1995341157581324288/img/0ZSx3GyaVnAq0C3O.jpg)
![Oncologist Dr. William Makis: "A...woman who had 6 mRNA vaccines...her breast cancer...[came] back...they stain it for spike protein from the [Covid] vaccine and...found [it] all over...the breast cancer metastasis...there was [jab] spike protein all over her tumor recurrence." "[And] another paper that is being attacked and being pushed for retraction is a paper that sequenced the vaccine-injured individuals, they took their blood, they sequenced their blood, and they found thousands of genetic alterations that were caused by the mRNA vaccines, [so] really... it just does all kinds of genetic damage that they've been able to now identify by sequencing the blood of a number of people who have had the vaccines." This clip of Dr. Makis (William Makis), a radiologist, oncologist, and cancer researcher, is taken from an interview with Seth Holehouse () posted to Rumble on November 21, 2025. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "Just in the past two months, there's been five or six studies that have come out looking at the integration of the genetic injections, the genetic 'vaccines' into the genome and causing cancer. There's the Italian study of 300,000 people, the South Korean study of 8.4 million people. "There's now been a case of an 85-year-old Japanese woman who had six mRNA vaccines. After her first three vaccines, which were Pfizer, she developed a breast lump. She was diagnosed with breast cancer, she had, two more vaccines, she had a mastectomy, she was considered cancer free. "Then she had her sixth vaccine, I believe it was a Pfizer vaccine. And then suddenly, within a few weeks, she has a new lump on her chest wall because she doesn't have her breasts anymore. New lump on the chest wall. They biopsy it, they find out her breast cancer has come back, but this time they stain it for the spike protein from the vaccine and they found the spike protein all over the metastasis, the breast cancer metastasis. And they test for nucleocapsid from the virus, no nucleocapsid, so it couldn't have been, that she got a COVID infection and that lingering infection, the virus somehow integrated and caused her cancer. "So this came out one month ago, proof that there was spike protein from the vaccine all over, her tumor recurrence. This was really the sixth Pfizer shot, caused her cancer to come back and the spike protein was in there, which means that there had been integration, into what became her cancer cells, her recurrent cancer cells. "We have another case that's been published in the past month, literally within days of this Japanese case. It was a 31-year-old woman who had three Moderna vaccines and developed an aggressive bladder tumor. The bladder tumor was genetically sequenced and the researchers found that it contained an exact match, a genetic sequence that was an exact match for the Pfizer vaccine. "Now it's interesting, she had the Moderna vaccines, they found a match for the Pfizer vaccine, but there are sequences that are the same in both vaccines. And they also did further genetic testing and they found that she had all kinds of genetic, instabilities and damage that had arisen after she had taken these three mRNA vaccines. "Again, published just a month ago, another paper that is being attacked and being pushed for retraction is a paper that sequenced the vaccine-injured individuals, they took their blood, they sequenced their blood and they found thousands of genetic alterations that were caused by the mRNA vaccines, really like that it just does all kinds of genetic damage that they've been able to now identify by sequencing the blood of, a number of people who have had the vaccines. [But] that paper is being pushed for retraction, and so, there's a heavy push to really not make any link between the vaccines and cancer."](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1991941338246607282/amplify_video_thumb/1991937347840331776/img/chXW18QcYOLylCnd.jpg)
![The NIH were sitting on a cancer breakthrough for 10 years, but did nothing with it. In a NEW report, we find out instead of helping this treatment without the toxicity of Chemo and radiation, the FDA just blocked it, choosing to give priority authorisation to Chemotherapy instead. IL-15 stimulates the bodies own natural cancer fighting capabilities, by up regulating the immune systems NK cells. Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong explains how IL-15 was designated by the NIH as the most important molecule to fight cancer, but they couldn't make it work. "The NIH tried to develop this for 10 years." "The NIH and NCI designated this IL15 as the most important molecule to cure cancer, and they failed to develop it, because they couldn't make it last long [or] figure out how to actually just target directly the NK cells. We did that". Just months ago, 2 senior scientists in the FDA said “we don’t care” when Patrick Soon-Shiong approached them and urged for a priority approval process.](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1977144852409454671/amplify_video_thumb/1977143543262216192/img/7fWaK8LIBdgCHVlV.jpg)
