Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

🚨 It's shocking how many people go through chemo and radiation only to eventually die from the treatment — not the cancer itself. Sergeant Ric Schiff, a San Francisco police officer, told this heartbreaking story in court: One of his twin daughters Crystin was diagnosed with a brain tumor...

DawnsMission's profile picture

Dr. Dawn Michael

221,267 subscribers

41,991 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat •via X (Twitter)

Gesundheit & WellnessNachrichten & Politik
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Here is another example of forced chemotherapy on a 10 year old Amish girl. Her name was Sarah and she got diagnosed with lymphoma in April 2013, and the Amish family was convinced by the doctor to do chemo and radiation. Couple months later, Sarah started getting severely ill (like most do on toxic chemo) and was begging her parents to stop the treatment, so they did and went for alternatives and second opinions. As soon as the parents stopped treatment, Akron children's hospital staff notified CPS and took them to court and got guardianship over Sarah. After the court ruling, the guardian sent out a taxi to the family to get Sarah and go to the hospital for more toxic chemo, but the family was gone. They fled to Mexico. While safely in another country, their lawyers fought the case and won in court on claims of religious freedom. 2 years later, she got bloodwork to confirm that she had no cancer without any chemo, and was in perfect health. Our medical and legal system is straight up demonic and harms/kills far more people than it helps. It's absurd that we're still trying to treat cancer with radiation and chemo, when all the data clearly shows how dangerous it is and how it rarely works. Like always... Profit > life
6:30

Here is another example of forced chemotherapy on a 10 year old Amish girl. Her name was Sarah and she got diagnosed with lymphoma in April 2013, and the Amish family was convinced by the doctor to do chemo and radiation. Couple months later, Sarah started getting severely ill (like most do on toxic chemo) and was begging her parents to stop the treatment, so they did and went for alternatives and second opinions. As soon as the parents stopped treatment, Akron children's hospital staff notified CPS and took them to court and got guardianship over Sarah. After the court ruling, the guardian sent out a taxi to the family to get Sarah and go to the hospital for more toxic chemo, but the family was gone. They fled to Mexico. While safely in another country, their lawyers fought the case and won in court on claims of religious freedom. 2 years later, she got bloodwork to confirm that she had no cancer without any chemo, and was in perfect health. Our medical and legal system is straight up demonic and harms/kills far more people than it helps. It's absurd that we're still trying to treat cancer with radiation and chemo, when all the data clearly shows how dangerous it is and how it rarely works. Like always... Profit > life

Inversionism

357,423 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

🚨Big problem! Dr. Suzanne Humphries: "Here's the real sucker punch... the Covid jabs lead to increased cancer susceptibility... but SV40-associated cancer won't respond well... to chemotherapy... [in fact,] radiation makes SV40 cancer far more aggressive...." This clip of Dr. Humphries (Dr Suzanne Humphries), a medical doctor, board-certified internist, nephrologist, and co-author of Dissolving Illusions, is taken from a presentation posted to the Children's Health Defense (Children’s Health Defense) Rumble channel on November 12, 2025. ---------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "And here's the real sucker punch. So you remember how SV40 knocks out that p53 gene and protein, which I talked to you before, the cancer suppressor. And that means that not only can the Covid jabs lead to increased cancer susceptibility, right? But SV40-associated cancer won't respond well at all to chemotherapy. "And conventional cancer treatments are likely to make cancer actually go wild and not regress because p53, it actually directs cancer cells to die off. It's necessary for chemo and especially for radiation to do the killing that they're supposed to be doing. And the fact that radiation makes SV40 cancer far more aggressive is the entire reason it was used in the Get Castro project, right? You know, radiating the animals first and then doing the gain of function with radiation. That's why they did it. "So you know, this is some older material, just to show you that they've known for a long time that SV40 blocks the effect of cancer treatments. And so there have been children who have died of SV40-related brain tumors. And the parents go and they do research. And this is what they have found. And so these are articles from like 1997. "So again, this is not something that top scientists should have bypassed. So the other brain cancers and solid cancers have been found to contain the SV40. And that the SV40 binds with the tumor-suppressor gene at p53, and it actually stops those tumor cells from undergoing what's called apoptosis, A-P-O-P-T-O-S-I-S, which really means programmed cell death. And that's how you're able to get cancer to regress, you know, when you're doing whatever you're doing traditionally. "Like, even if it's like, look, we know radiation does make tumor cells regress. Do they come back later? Most of the time, yes, they do cancer, you know, chemotherapy. Like, my father got chemotherapy when he had tumors all over his body. We got nine extra months with him, so I was okay with that. But did they all come back to kill him? Yes, they did, but I got an extra nine months. "But the point being that, you get that programmed cell death. But then if there's a P— If it's an SV40-related cancer especially, you're going to wind up with probably a turbo cancer at that point. "Yeah, I'm just going to read this to you because when I said that people knew about this and there were, you know, parents of children who developed brain tumors and testified in front of Congress. This was one of the very well-educated parents. Exposing SV40-positive cancer cells to chemo and radiation does not kill the cells, but simply creates more genetic mutations, making the cancer more aggressive. The bottom line is that SV40 causes human cancer, stops orthodox cancer treatments like chemo and radiation from providing any benefit and can make the cancer even more aggressive."
3:12

🚨Big problem! Dr. Suzanne Humphries: "Here's the real sucker punch... the Covid jabs lead to increased cancer susceptibility... but SV40-associated cancer won't respond well... to chemotherapy... [in fact,] radiation makes SV40 cancer far more aggressive...." This clip of Dr. Humphries (Dr Suzanne Humphries), a medical doctor, board-certified internist, nephrologist, and co-author of Dissolving Illusions, is taken from a presentation posted to the Children's Health Defense (Children’s Health Defense) Rumble channel on November 12, 2025. ---------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "And here's the real sucker punch. So you remember how SV40 knocks out that p53 gene and protein, which I talked to you before, the cancer suppressor. And that means that not only can the Covid jabs lead to increased cancer susceptibility, right? But SV40-associated cancer won't respond well at all to chemotherapy. "And conventional cancer treatments are likely to make cancer actually go wild and not regress because p53, it actually directs cancer cells to die off. It's necessary for chemo and especially for radiation to do the killing that they're supposed to be doing. And the fact that radiation makes SV40 cancer far more aggressive is the entire reason it was used in the Get Castro project, right? You know, radiating the animals first and then doing the gain of function with radiation. That's why they did it. "So you know, this is some older material, just to show you that they've known for a long time that SV40 blocks the effect of cancer treatments. And so there have been children who have died of SV40-related brain tumors. And the parents go and they do research. And this is what they have found. And so these are articles from like 1997. "So again, this is not something that top scientists should have bypassed. So the other brain cancers and solid cancers have been found to contain the SV40. And that the SV40 binds with the tumor-suppressor gene at p53, and it actually stops those tumor cells from undergoing what's called apoptosis, A-P-O-P-T-O-S-I-S, which really means programmed cell death. And that's how you're able to get cancer to regress, you know, when you're doing whatever you're doing traditionally. "Like, even if it's like, look, we know radiation does make tumor cells regress. Do they come back later? Most of the time, yes, they do cancer, you know, chemotherapy. Like, my father got chemotherapy when he had tumors all over his body. We got nine extra months with him, so I was okay with that. But did they all come back to kill him? Yes, they did, but I got an extra nine months. "But the point being that, you get that programmed cell death. But then if there's a P— If it's an SV40-related cancer especially, you're going to wind up with probably a turbo cancer at that point. "Yeah, I'm just going to read this to you because when I said that people knew about this and there were, you know, parents of children who developed brain tumors and testified in front of Congress. This was one of the very well-educated parents. Exposing SV40-positive cancer cells to chemo and radiation does not kill the cells, but simply creates more genetic mutations, making the cancer more aggressive. The bottom line is that SV40 causes human cancer, stops orthodox cancer treatments like chemo and radiation from providing any benefit and can make the cancer even more aggressive."

Sense Receptor

54,169 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong Exposes the Cancer Treatment Lie: "Chemo & Radiation Destroy Your Body’s Best Defense—Here’s the Breakthrough That Actually Works" For decades, the world fought cancer with two brutal weapons: chemotherapy and radiation. But what if these treatments weaken the very system designed to save you? Hidden in your body for 460 million years are natural killer cells—your immune system’s elite soldiers against cancer. Yet chemo, radiation, steroids, and even newer drugs like Temodol cripple these cells. One radiation dose can shut them down for a year—leaving patients defenseless when they need protection most. Now, the game has changed. After battling Big Pharma, FDA roadblocks, and systemic resistance, Dr. Soon-Shiong’s team has pioneered a single-injection "Bio-Shield" therapy that activates your body’s natural cancer-fighting army. The results? ✅ Bladder cancer patients disease-free for 10+ years ✅ No toxic chemo or radiation side effects ✅ Potential to treat long COVID, HIV & sepsis The Biden administration blocked this breakthrough—along with COVID treatments—but the dam has broken. The future of medicine isn’t poisoning the body to save it. It’s unleashing the power God put inside us. The full story drops in Cancer Decoded. Follow to learn how we’re ending the era of suffering—and saving millions.
3:48

Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong Exposes the Cancer Treatment Lie: "Chemo & Radiation Destroy Your Body’s Best Defense—Here’s the Breakthrough That Actually Works" For decades, the world fought cancer with two brutal weapons: chemotherapy and radiation. But what if these treatments weaken the very system designed to save you? Hidden in your body for 460 million years are natural killer cells—your immune system’s elite soldiers against cancer. Yet chemo, radiation, steroids, and even newer drugs like Temodol cripple these cells. One radiation dose can shut them down for a year—leaving patients defenseless when they need protection most. Now, the game has changed. After battling Big Pharma, FDA roadblocks, and systemic resistance, Dr. Soon-Shiong’s team has pioneered a single-injection "Bio-Shield" therapy that activates your body’s natural cancer-fighting army. The results? ✅ Bladder cancer patients disease-free for 10+ years ✅ No toxic chemo or radiation side effects ✅ Potential to treat long COVID, HIV & sepsis The Biden administration blocked this breakthrough—along with COVID treatments—but the dam has broken. The future of medicine isn’t poisoning the body to save it. It’s unleashing the power God put inside us. The full story drops in Cancer Decoded. Follow to learn how we’re ending the era of suffering—and saving millions.

Camus

127,084 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🚨 CANCER SCAM EXPOSED: “Chemo Destroys the Very Cells That Could Save You.” 🚨 Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong just dropped a bombshell: 🧬 “Chemo. Radiation. Even Temodol — they wipe out your natural killer cells, your body’s best defense against cancer.” 💥 One radiation dose can shut down your immune response for a YEAR. 💥 Steroids, chemo & Big Pharma’s drugs? They’re crippling your only shield. But the truth is out now—and it’s being called "Bio-Shield Therapy." A single injection that reawakens your cancer-killing cells. ✅ Patients with bladder cancer are disease-free 10+ years ✅ No toxic chemo or radiation ✅ Could treat long COVID, HIV & even sepsis ❌ Biden’s FDA blocked this. ❌ Big Pharma fought to bury it. Why? Because you can't patent the immune system God gave you. 🔥 The era of poisoning the body to “save it” is OVER. 🔥 The future of medicine is already here. 📢 FULL STORY in Cancer Decoded. Follow now to learn how we end the suffering—and save millions.
3:53

🚨 CANCER SCAM EXPOSED: “Chemo Destroys the Very Cells That Could Save You.” 🚨 Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong just dropped a bombshell: 🧬 “Chemo. Radiation. Even Temodol — they wipe out your natural killer cells, your body’s best defense against cancer.” 💥 One radiation dose can shut down your immune response for a YEAR. 💥 Steroids, chemo & Big Pharma’s drugs? They’re crippling your only shield. But the truth is out now—and it’s being called "Bio-Shield Therapy." A single injection that reawakens your cancer-killing cells. ✅ Patients with bladder cancer are disease-free 10+ years ✅ No toxic chemo or radiation ✅ Could treat long COVID, HIV & even sepsis ❌ Biden’s FDA blocked this. ❌ Big Pharma fought to bury it. Why? Because you can't patent the immune system God gave you. 🔥 The era of poisoning the body to “save it” is OVER. 🔥 The future of medicine is already here. 📢 FULL STORY in Cancer Decoded. Follow now to learn how we end the suffering—and save millions.

Jim Ferguson

1,507,522 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Joe Rogan and Andy Stumpf just had a raw conversation about cancer that hits hard. They exposed an oncologist who was convicted of deliberately giving chemotherapy to patients who didn’t even have cancer — purely because it was extremely profitable. Andy revealed that his own mom survived cervical cancer, only for it to return years later. The chemo was so brutal she chose hospice and death over another round. Joe shared the story of a fit friend in his early 40s who beat cancer once, only for it to slam back like a freight train shortly after vaccination — one of the aggressive “turbo cancer” cases some people are talking about. Both men were clearly shaken by how fast healthy, strong people are being taken out and how little honest discussion there is around profit-driven treatment. It’s a tough, unflinching look at the human cost behind the system. Have you or someone close to you gone through chemotherapy and felt it was worse than the cancer itself — or do you think the system mostly gets these calls right despite the horror stories?
3:51

Joe Rogan and Andy Stumpf just had a raw conversation about cancer that hits hard. They exposed an oncologist who was convicted of deliberately giving chemotherapy to patients who didn’t even have cancer — purely because it was extremely profitable. Andy revealed that his own mom survived cervical cancer, only for it to return years later. The chemo was so brutal she chose hospice and death over another round. Joe shared the story of a fit friend in his early 40s who beat cancer once, only for it to slam back like a freight train shortly after vaccination — one of the aggressive “turbo cancer” cases some people are talking about. Both men were clearly shaken by how fast healthy, strong people are being taken out and how little honest discussion there is around profit-driven treatment. It’s a tough, unflinching look at the human cost behind the system. Have you or someone close to you gone through chemotherapy and felt it was worse than the cancer itself — or do you think the system mostly gets these calls right despite the horror stories?

Camus

25,684 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Oncologist Dr. William Makis: "A...woman who had 6 mRNA vaccines...her breast cancer...[came] back...they stain it for spike protein from the [Covid] vaccine and...found [it] all over...the breast cancer metastasis...there was [jab] spike protein all over her tumor recurrence." "[And] another paper that is being attacked and being pushed for retraction is a paper that sequenced the vaccine-injured individuals, they took their blood, they sequenced their blood, and they found thousands of genetic alterations that were caused by the mRNA vaccines, [so] really... it just does all kinds of genetic damage that they've been able to now identify by sequencing the blood of a number of people who have had the vaccines." This clip of Dr. Makis (William Makis), a radiologist, oncologist, and cancer researcher, is taken from an interview with Seth Holehouse () posted to Rumble on November 21, 2025. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "Just in the past two months, there's been five or six studies that have come out looking at the integration of the genetic injections, the genetic 'vaccines' into the genome and causing cancer. There's the Italian study of 300,000 people, the South Korean study of 8.4 million people. "There's now been a case of an 85-year-old Japanese woman who had six mRNA vaccines. After her first three vaccines, which were Pfizer, she developed a breast lump. She was diagnosed with breast cancer, she had, two more vaccines, she had a mastectomy, she was considered cancer free. "Then she had her sixth vaccine, I believe it was a Pfizer vaccine. And then suddenly, within a few weeks, she has a new lump on her chest wall because she doesn't have her breasts anymore. New lump on the chest wall. They biopsy it, they find out her breast cancer has come back, but this time they stain it for the spike protein from the vaccine and they found the spike protein all over the metastasis, the breast cancer metastasis. And they test for nucleocapsid from the virus, no nucleocapsid, so it couldn't have been, that she got a COVID infection and that lingering infection, the virus somehow integrated and caused her cancer. "So this came out one month ago, proof that there was spike protein from the vaccine all over, her tumor recurrence. This was really the sixth Pfizer shot, caused her cancer to come back and the spike protein was in there, which means that there had been integration, into what became her cancer cells, her recurrent cancer cells. "We have another case that's been published in the past month, literally within days of this Japanese case. It was a 31-year-old woman who had three Moderna vaccines and developed an aggressive bladder tumor. The bladder tumor was genetically sequenced and the researchers found that it contained an exact match, a genetic sequence that was an exact match for the Pfizer vaccine. "Now it's interesting, she had the Moderna vaccines, they found a match for the Pfizer vaccine, but there are sequences that are the same in both vaccines. And they also did further genetic testing and they found that she had all kinds of genetic, instabilities and damage that had arisen after she had taken these three mRNA vaccines. "Again, published just a month ago, another paper that is being attacked and being pushed for retraction is a paper that sequenced the vaccine-injured individuals, they took their blood, they sequenced their blood and they found thousands of genetic alterations that were caused by the mRNA vaccines, really like that it just does all kinds of genetic damage that they've been able to now identify by sequencing the blood of, a number of people who have had the vaccines. [But] that paper is being pushed for retraction, and so, there's a heavy push to really not make any link between the vaccines and cancer."
3:14

Oncologist Dr. William Makis: "A...woman who had 6 mRNA vaccines...her breast cancer...[came] back...they stain it for spike protein from the [Covid] vaccine and...found [it] all over...the breast cancer metastasis...there was [jab] spike protein all over her tumor recurrence." "[And] another paper that is being attacked and being pushed for retraction is a paper that sequenced the vaccine-injured individuals, they took their blood, they sequenced their blood, and they found thousands of genetic alterations that were caused by the mRNA vaccines, [so] really... it just does all kinds of genetic damage that they've been able to now identify by sequencing the blood of a number of people who have had the vaccines." This clip of Dr. Makis (William Makis), a radiologist, oncologist, and cancer researcher, is taken from an interview with Seth Holehouse () posted to Rumble on November 21, 2025. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "Just in the past two months, there's been five or six studies that have come out looking at the integration of the genetic injections, the genetic 'vaccines' into the genome and causing cancer. There's the Italian study of 300,000 people, the South Korean study of 8.4 million people. "There's now been a case of an 85-year-old Japanese woman who had six mRNA vaccines. After her first three vaccines, which were Pfizer, she developed a breast lump. She was diagnosed with breast cancer, she had, two more vaccines, she had a mastectomy, she was considered cancer free. "Then she had her sixth vaccine, I believe it was a Pfizer vaccine. And then suddenly, within a few weeks, she has a new lump on her chest wall because she doesn't have her breasts anymore. New lump on the chest wall. They biopsy it, they find out her breast cancer has come back, but this time they stain it for the spike protein from the vaccine and they found the spike protein all over the metastasis, the breast cancer metastasis. And they test for nucleocapsid from the virus, no nucleocapsid, so it couldn't have been, that she got a COVID infection and that lingering infection, the virus somehow integrated and caused her cancer. "So this came out one month ago, proof that there was spike protein from the vaccine all over, her tumor recurrence. This was really the sixth Pfizer shot, caused her cancer to come back and the spike protein was in there, which means that there had been integration, into what became her cancer cells, her recurrent cancer cells. "We have another case that's been published in the past month, literally within days of this Japanese case. It was a 31-year-old woman who had three Moderna vaccines and developed an aggressive bladder tumor. The bladder tumor was genetically sequenced and the researchers found that it contained an exact match, a genetic sequence that was an exact match for the Pfizer vaccine. "Now it's interesting, she had the Moderna vaccines, they found a match for the Pfizer vaccine, but there are sequences that are the same in both vaccines. And they also did further genetic testing and they found that she had all kinds of genetic, instabilities and damage that had arisen after she had taken these three mRNA vaccines. "Again, published just a month ago, another paper that is being attacked and being pushed for retraction is a paper that sequenced the vaccine-injured individuals, they took their blood, they sequenced their blood and they found thousands of genetic alterations that were caused by the mRNA vaccines, really like that it just does all kinds of genetic damage that they've been able to now identify by sequencing the blood of, a number of people who have had the vaccines. [But] that paper is being pushed for retraction, and so, there's a heavy push to really not make any link between the vaccines and cancer."

Sense Receptor

35,372 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Megyn Kelly sat down with Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong to discuss his revolutionary cancer protocol—a treatment that has already extended lives by years for patients with terminal diagnoses, including the late Senator Harry Reid. The Science Behind the Breakthrough Dr. Soon-Shiong’s approach challenges conventional cancer treatments like chemotherapy and radiation, which destroy the immune system’s natural killer (NK) cells and T-cells—critical for fighting cancer. His BioStripe treatment works by rebuilding the immune system, even in patients who have exhausted all other options. Real Patients, Miraculous Results Merkel cell carcinoma (5th-line treatment): Complete remission—patient lived 6+ years and didn’t die from cancer. Bladder cancer: Patients still alive 10-11 years later. Triple-negative breast cancer: Multiple complete remissions. Metastatic pancreatic cancer: One patient disease-free after 5 years, now 6+ years and counting. FDA Roadblocks & Lost Time Despite undeniable success, Dr. Soon-Shiong faced years of resistance from regulators. In 2015, he proposed testing his method before chemo/radiation—but the FDA insisted on starting with end-stage patients. After 700,000 pages of submissions, approval finally came in late 2024. The Future: Beyond Cancer This treatment isn’t just for cancer—it’s showing promise against sepsis and severe infections. One recent case: A Valley Fever patient on a ventilator, given last rites—fully recovered after treatment. The Urgent Question Why is bureaucracy slowing down a therapy that could save millions? With pancreatic cancer, glioblastoma, and lung cancer patients still dying every day, how many more lives could have been saved if this had been fast-tracked?
3:46

Megyn Kelly sat down with Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong to discuss his revolutionary cancer protocol—a treatment that has already extended lives by years for patients with terminal diagnoses, including the late Senator Harry Reid. The Science Behind the Breakthrough Dr. Soon-Shiong’s approach challenges conventional cancer treatments like chemotherapy and radiation, which destroy the immune system’s natural killer (NK) cells and T-cells—critical for fighting cancer. His BioStripe treatment works by rebuilding the immune system, even in patients who have exhausted all other options. Real Patients, Miraculous Results Merkel cell carcinoma (5th-line treatment): Complete remission—patient lived 6+ years and didn’t die from cancer. Bladder cancer: Patients still alive 10-11 years later. Triple-negative breast cancer: Multiple complete remissions. Metastatic pancreatic cancer: One patient disease-free after 5 years, now 6+ years and counting. FDA Roadblocks & Lost Time Despite undeniable success, Dr. Soon-Shiong faced years of resistance from regulators. In 2015, he proposed testing his method before chemo/radiation—but the FDA insisted on starting with end-stage patients. After 700,000 pages of submissions, approval finally came in late 2024. The Future: Beyond Cancer This treatment isn’t just for cancer—it’s showing promise against sepsis and severe infections. One recent case: A Valley Fever patient on a ventilator, given last rites—fully recovered after treatment. The Urgent Question Why is bureaucracy slowing down a therapy that could save millions? With pancreatic cancer, glioblastoma, and lung cancer patients still dying every day, how many more lives could have been saved if this had been fast-tracked?

Camus

615,537 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Of all the casualties in the war on cancer, the most critical have been the most ignored: your NK and T cells. As Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong explains, while oncology has long treated the anemia and neutropenia caused by chemotherapy, it has overlooked the destruction of the very immune cells that fight cancer. For 35 years, there was no treatment for this catastrophic side effect. That era is over. Dr. Soon-Shiong announces ANKTIVA, the first FDA-approved therapy proven to activate NK cells, T cells, and memory T cells. The result? Documented complete responses in bladder cancer patients, free of disease for over nine years. This breakthrough shatters a long-standing medical blind spot. Whether from chemo, radiation, or a severe viral infection, the body's primary defense is often wiped out. ANKTIVA represents a paradigm shift—from solely attacking disease to actively re-arming the patient's own immune system. The future of medicine is not just fighting the enemy, but empowering the army within.
3:35

Of all the casualties in the war on cancer, the most critical have been the most ignored: your NK and T cells. As Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong explains, while oncology has long treated the anemia and neutropenia caused by chemotherapy, it has overlooked the destruction of the very immune cells that fight cancer. For 35 years, there was no treatment for this catastrophic side effect. That era is over. Dr. Soon-Shiong announces ANKTIVA, the first FDA-approved therapy proven to activate NK cells, T cells, and memory T cells. The result? Documented complete responses in bladder cancer patients, free of disease for over nine years. This breakthrough shatters a long-standing medical blind spot. Whether from chemo, radiation, or a severe viral infection, the body's primary defense is often wiped out. ANKTIVA represents a paradigm shift—from solely attacking disease to actively re-arming the patient's own immune system. The future of medicine is not just fighting the enemy, but empowering the army within.

Camus

55,260 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

A Physicians Survey Revealed 88.3% Of Doctors Would Refuse Chemotherapy For Their Own Cancer Treatment. The 5 Year Chemo Survival Rate Is Only 2.1%, Yet Most Oncologists Only Offer 'Standard Of Care' To Patients. Dr Seyfried Would Choose The Protocol With Ivermectin & Fasting. American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Board of Directors has data that oncologists THEMSELVES would not take chemotherapy for cancer even though they advise chemo & radiation as the only 'approved' treatment to their patients. MacKillop & colleagues found that a survey of Canadian doctors who treat lung cancer, only 16% would want chemotherapy for their own treatment if they had a cancer diagnosis. Lind & colleagues interviewed teaching oncologists in Boston & found that only 27% would take chemo for lung cancer. "The contribution of cytotoxic chemotherapy to 5-year survival in adult malignancies" cites...The overall contribution of curative & adjuvant cytotoxic chemotherapy to 5-year survival in adults is only 2.3% in Australia & 2.1% in the USA. Cancer treatment is a multi-billion dollar industry. Most oncologists believe that cancer is genetic, but cancer is a metabolic disease. Doctors don’t study nutrition or metabolic therapy & don't even know that chemotherapy historically was a 'weapon of war' mustard gas. Banned from use in war because it is cytotoxic & too inhumane, even against war enemies. The system profits more from lifelong chemo & radiation than natural intervention. Chemotherapy is not the answer to heal the body of cancer. GKI Glucose Ketone Index & Cancer Eradication Based On Otto Warburg's Groundbreaking Research: Cancer cells are metabolically inflexible & cannot use ketone bodies for energy when glucose is limited, unlike healthy cells. A low GKI is achieved by restricting carbohydrates, which lowers blood glucose & increases ketone production. This starves cancer cells of glucose while providing normal cells with an alternative energy source. Research shows a low glucose environment promotes our Natural Killer (NK) cells & T-cells to become even stronger which are crucial for killing cancer. Chemotherapy & radiation actually kills our NK Natural Killer Cells allowing cancer to return even stronger than before conventional treatment. 15 expert physicians & oncologists have published...'Targeting the Mitochondrial-Stem Cell Connection in Cancer Treatment: A Hybrid Orthomolecular Protocol.' This is the step by step protocol of fasting, high fat ketogenic diet (eliminating glucose) & using ivermectin, fenbendazole & supportive nutrients with lifestyle changes for cancer treatment remission. This protocol, along with cited research is linked in the replies. Have you used non traditional methods to reverse cancer? Is your cancer in remission thanks to fasting, ivermectin or other alternative protocols?
1:25

A Physicians Survey Revealed 88.3% Of Doctors Would Refuse Chemotherapy For Their Own Cancer Treatment. The 5 Year Chemo Survival Rate Is Only 2.1%, Yet Most Oncologists Only Offer 'Standard Of Care' To Patients. Dr Seyfried Would Choose The Protocol With Ivermectin & Fasting. American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Board of Directors has data that oncologists THEMSELVES would not take chemotherapy for cancer even though they advise chemo & radiation as the only 'approved' treatment to their patients. MacKillop & colleagues found that a survey of Canadian doctors who treat lung cancer, only 16% would want chemotherapy for their own treatment if they had a cancer diagnosis. Lind & colleagues interviewed teaching oncologists in Boston & found that only 27% would take chemo for lung cancer. "The contribution of cytotoxic chemotherapy to 5-year survival in adult malignancies" cites...The overall contribution of curative & adjuvant cytotoxic chemotherapy to 5-year survival in adults is only 2.3% in Australia & 2.1% in the USA. Cancer treatment is a multi-billion dollar industry. Most oncologists believe that cancer is genetic, but cancer is a metabolic disease. Doctors don’t study nutrition or metabolic therapy & don't even know that chemotherapy historically was a 'weapon of war' mustard gas. Banned from use in war because it is cytotoxic & too inhumane, even against war enemies. The system profits more from lifelong chemo & radiation than natural intervention. Chemotherapy is not the answer to heal the body of cancer. GKI Glucose Ketone Index & Cancer Eradication Based On Otto Warburg's Groundbreaking Research: Cancer cells are metabolically inflexible & cannot use ketone bodies for energy when glucose is limited, unlike healthy cells. A low GKI is achieved by restricting carbohydrates, which lowers blood glucose & increases ketone production. This starves cancer cells of glucose while providing normal cells with an alternative energy source. Research shows a low glucose environment promotes our Natural Killer (NK) cells & T-cells to become even stronger which are crucial for killing cancer. Chemotherapy & radiation actually kills our NK Natural Killer Cells allowing cancer to return even stronger than before conventional treatment. 15 expert physicians & oncologists have published...'Targeting the Mitochondrial-Stem Cell Connection in Cancer Treatment: A Hybrid Orthomolecular Protocol.' This is the step by step protocol of fasting, high fat ketogenic diet (eliminating glucose) & using ivermectin, fenbendazole & supportive nutrients with lifestyle changes for cancer treatment remission. This protocol, along with cited research is linked in the replies. Have you used non traditional methods to reverse cancer? Is your cancer in remission thanks to fasting, ivermectin or other alternative protocols?

Valerie Anne Smith

262,596 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

A Physicians Survey Revealed 88.3% Of Doctors Would Refuse Chemotherapy For Their Own Cancer Treatment. The 5 Year Chemo Survival Rate Is Only 2.1%, Yet Most Oncologists Only Offer 'Standard Of Care' To Patients. Dr Seyfried Would Choose The Protocol With Ivermectin & Fasting. American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Board of Directors has data that oncologists THEMSELVES would not take chemotherapy for cancer even though they advise chemo & radiation as the only 'approved' treatment to their patients. MacKillop & colleagues found that a survey of Canadian doctors who treat lung cancer, only 16% would want chemotherapy for their own treatment if they had a cancer diagnosis. Lind & colleagues interviewed teaching oncologists in Boston & found that only 27% would take chemo for lung cancer. "The contribution of cytotoxic chemotherapy to 5-year survival in adult malignancies" cites...The overall contribution of curative & adjuvant cytotoxic chemotherapy to 5-year survival in adults is only 2.3% in Australia & 2.1% in the USA. Cancer treatment is a multi-billion dollar industry. Most oncologists believe that cancer is genetic, but cancer is a metabolic disease. Doctors don’t study nutrition or metabolic therapy & don't even know that chemotherapy historically was a 'weapon of war' mustard gas. Banned from use in war because it is cytotoxic & too inhumane, even against war enemies. The system profits more from lifelong chemo & radiation than natural intervention. Chemotherapy is not the answer to heal the body of cancer. GKI Glucose Ketone Index & Cancer Eradication Based On Otto Warburg's Groundbreaking Research: Cancer cells are metabolically inflexible & cannot use ketone bodies for energy when glucose is limited, unlike healthy cells. A low GKI is achieved by restricting carbohydrates, which lowers blood glucose & increases ketone production. This starves cancer cells of glucose while providing normal cells with an alternative energy source. Research shows a low glucose environment promotes our Natural Killer (NK) cells & T-cells to become even stronger which are crucial for killing cancer. Chemotherapy & radiation actually kills our NK Natural Killer Cells allowing cancer to return even stronger than before conventional treatment. 15 expert physicians & oncologists have published...'Targeting the Mitochondrial-Stem Cell Connection in Cancer Treatment: A Hybrid Orthomolecular Protocol.' This is the step by step protocol of fasting, high fat ketogenic diet (eliminating glucose) & using ivermectin, fenbendazole & supportive nutrients with lifestyle changes for cancer treatment remission. This protocol, along with cited research is linked in the replies. Have you used non traditional methods to reverse cancer? Is your cancer in remission thanks to fasting, ivermectin or other alternative protocols? Share and repost this message to increase awareness. It is essential for the public to be informed. Follow my page for further motivational and educational content.
0:59

A Physicians Survey Revealed 88.3% Of Doctors Would Refuse Chemotherapy For Their Own Cancer Treatment. The 5 Year Chemo Survival Rate Is Only 2.1%, Yet Most Oncologists Only Offer 'Standard Of Care' To Patients. Dr Seyfried Would Choose The Protocol With Ivermectin & Fasting. American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Board of Directors has data that oncologists THEMSELVES would not take chemotherapy for cancer even though they advise chemo & radiation as the only 'approved' treatment to their patients. MacKillop & colleagues found that a survey of Canadian doctors who treat lung cancer, only 16% would want chemotherapy for their own treatment if they had a cancer diagnosis. Lind & colleagues interviewed teaching oncologists in Boston & found that only 27% would take chemo for lung cancer. "The contribution of cytotoxic chemotherapy to 5-year survival in adult malignancies" cites...The overall contribution of curative & adjuvant cytotoxic chemotherapy to 5-year survival in adults is only 2.3% in Australia & 2.1% in the USA. Cancer treatment is a multi-billion dollar industry. Most oncologists believe that cancer is genetic, but cancer is a metabolic disease. Doctors don’t study nutrition or metabolic therapy & don't even know that chemotherapy historically was a 'weapon of war' mustard gas. Banned from use in war because it is cytotoxic & too inhumane, even against war enemies. The system profits more from lifelong chemo & radiation than natural intervention. Chemotherapy is not the answer to heal the body of cancer. GKI Glucose Ketone Index & Cancer Eradication Based On Otto Warburg's Groundbreaking Research: Cancer cells are metabolically inflexible & cannot use ketone bodies for energy when glucose is limited, unlike healthy cells. A low GKI is achieved by restricting carbohydrates, which lowers blood glucose & increases ketone production. This starves cancer cells of glucose while providing normal cells with an alternative energy source. Research shows a low glucose environment promotes our Natural Killer (NK) cells & T-cells to become even stronger which are crucial for killing cancer. Chemotherapy & radiation actually kills our NK Natural Killer Cells allowing cancer to return even stronger than before conventional treatment. 15 expert physicians & oncologists have published...'Targeting the Mitochondrial-Stem Cell Connection in Cancer Treatment: A Hybrid Orthomolecular Protocol.' This is the step by step protocol of fasting, high fat ketogenic diet (eliminating glucose) & using ivermectin, fenbendazole & supportive nutrients with lifestyle changes for cancer treatment remission. This protocol, along with cited research is linked in the replies. Have you used non traditional methods to reverse cancer? Is your cancer in remission thanks to fasting, ivermectin or other alternative protocols? Share and repost this message to increase awareness. It is essential for the public to be informed. Follow my page for further motivational and educational content.

Joe Tippens

47,858 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Dr. Thomas Seyfried drops a bombshell: "We haven't advanced glioblastoma treatment in 100 years—yet standard radiation/chemo often accelerates patient death by flooding tumors with glucose & glutamine." His team's new open-access protocol (metabolic therapy: keto + glutamine targeting) turns deadly brain cancer manageable—not "cured," but indolent. Proof? Patient Pablo Kelly lived 10 years with glioblastoma (married, had 3 kids) on metabolic therapy alone—no radiation/chemo. Died from surgery complications, not the tumor. "The same strategy works for most cancers—they all ferment glucose & glutamine, can't burn ketones." Standard care? "Doing the same stupid thing... and getting angry when shown better options." Watch this powerful 4:58 clip. Cancer as chronic manageable disease—not death sentence? Game-changer or threat to status quo? Your take below.
4:58

Dr. Thomas Seyfried drops a bombshell: "We haven't advanced glioblastoma treatment in 100 years—yet standard radiation/chemo often accelerates patient death by flooding tumors with glucose & glutamine." His team's new open-access protocol (metabolic therapy: keto + glutamine targeting) turns deadly brain cancer manageable—not "cured," but indolent. Proof? Patient Pablo Kelly lived 10 years with glioblastoma (married, had 3 kids) on metabolic therapy alone—no radiation/chemo. Died from surgery complications, not the tumor. "The same strategy works for most cancers—they all ferment glucose & glutamine, can't burn ketones." Standard care? "Doing the same stupid thing... and getting angry when shown better options." Watch this powerful 4:58 clip. Cancer as chronic manageable disease—not death sentence? Game-changer or threat to status quo? Your take below.

Camus

62,484 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Medical pioneer Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong unveils a paradigm-shifting approach to cancer treatment that could save millions of lives. In an interview, he revealed we already have the key: protecting the immune system FIRST. The current standard of care—chemotherapy and radiation—often destroys a patient’s lymphocytes (NK & T cells), leading to a condition called lymphopenia. For decades, over 300 studies have shown that lymphopenia predicts early mortality, not just in cancer, but in sepsis and trauma. We treat anemia, but we’ve NEVER had an approved treatment for this critical immune deficiency. Until now. Dr. Soon-Shiong’s “Bio-Shield” is that breakthrough. It’s already approved, and the results are profound: Prostate cancer patients treated with the Bio-Shield before radiation achieved complete remission while their lymphocytes were protected. An ovarian cancer patient received the full, brutal course of chemo after the Bio-Shield. Her cancer disappeared, and she proceeded to surgery with a protected immune system. The vision is simple, yet revolutionary: Mandate that ANY patient undergoing radiation or chemotherapy first receives the Bio-Shield to protect their immune system. The treatment isn’t just attacking the cancer; it’s fortifying the body’s own innate ability to fight and survive. The call to action is clear. We don't need to wait for new regulatory hurdles. We need immediate education for doctors and patients across the nation. We have the power to turn the tide. This is the future of medicine: treating the patient's immune system as the most valuable asset in the fight for their life.
2:53

Medical pioneer Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong unveils a paradigm-shifting approach to cancer treatment that could save millions of lives. In an interview, he revealed we already have the key: protecting the immune system FIRST. The current standard of care—chemotherapy and radiation—often destroys a patient’s lymphocytes (NK & T cells), leading to a condition called lymphopenia. For decades, over 300 studies have shown that lymphopenia predicts early mortality, not just in cancer, but in sepsis and trauma. We treat anemia, but we’ve NEVER had an approved treatment for this critical immune deficiency. Until now. Dr. Soon-Shiong’s “Bio-Shield” is that breakthrough. It’s already approved, and the results are profound: Prostate cancer patients treated with the Bio-Shield before radiation achieved complete remission while their lymphocytes were protected. An ovarian cancer patient received the full, brutal course of chemo after the Bio-Shield. Her cancer disappeared, and she proceeded to surgery with a protected immune system. The vision is simple, yet revolutionary: Mandate that ANY patient undergoing radiation or chemotherapy first receives the Bio-Shield to protect their immune system. The treatment isn’t just attacking the cancer; it’s fortifying the body’s own innate ability to fight and survive. The call to action is clear. We don't need to wait for new regulatory hurdles. We need immediate education for doctors and patients across the nation. We have the power to turn the tide. This is the future of medicine: treating the patient's immune system as the most valuable asset in the fight for their life.

Camus

38,936 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

🚨 BOMBSHELL! Elon Musk Discusses a Hidden Brain Cancer Curing Drug 👀 Bookmark this and share with everyone you know… lives can be saved. The mother of a friend of Elon Musk was diagnosed with brain cancer.. her doctor said she only had a few months to live. His friend did some digging… —— “There’s a drug that’s in trials, where you take this pill and it actually makes the brain cancer go away, literally.. and it cured his mom.” The drug is called WELIREG… and maybe more people should know about it. ( It’s in trials at Harvard and prevented from being approved because of over-regulations. This Clip
1:47

🚨 BOMBSHELL! Elon Musk Discusses a Hidden Brain Cancer Curing Drug 👀 Bookmark this and share with everyone you know… lives can be saved. The mother of a friend of Elon Musk was diagnosed with brain cancer.. her doctor said she only had a few months to live. His friend did some digging… —— “There’s a drug that’s in trials, where you take this pill and it actually makes the brain cancer go away, literally.. and it cured his mom.” The drug is called WELIREG… and maybe more people should know about it. ( It’s in trials at Harvard and prevented from being approved because of over-regulations. This Clip

MJTruthUltra

2,003,086 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

The NIH were sitting on a cancer breakthrough for 10 years, but did nothing with it. In a NEW report, we find out instead of helping this treatment without the toxicity of Chemo and radiation, the FDA just blocked it, choosing to give priority authorisation to Chemotherapy instead. IL-15 stimulates the bodies own natural cancer fighting capabilities, by up regulating the immune systems NK cells. Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong explains how IL-15 was designated by the NIH as the most important molecule to fight cancer, but they couldn't make it work. "The NIH tried to develop this for 10 years." "The NIH and NCI designated this IL15 as the most important molecule to cure cancer, and they failed to develop it, because they couldn't make it last long [or] figure out how to actually just target directly the NK cells. We did that". Just months ago, 2 senior scientists in the FDA said “we don’t care” when Patrick Soon-Shiong approached them and urged for a priority approval process.
1:15

The NIH were sitting on a cancer breakthrough for 10 years, but did nothing with it. In a NEW report, we find out instead of helping this treatment without the toxicity of Chemo and radiation, the FDA just blocked it, choosing to give priority authorisation to Chemotherapy instead. IL-15 stimulates the bodies own natural cancer fighting capabilities, by up regulating the immune systems NK cells. Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong explains how IL-15 was designated by the NIH as the most important molecule to fight cancer, but they couldn't make it work. "The NIH tried to develop this for 10 years." "The NIH and NCI designated this IL15 as the most important molecule to cure cancer, and they failed to develop it, because they couldn't make it last long [or] figure out how to actually just target directly the NK cells. We did that". Just months ago, 2 senior scientists in the FDA said “we don’t care” when Patrick Soon-Shiong approached them and urged for a priority approval process.

Humanspective

117,025 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Dude was healthy living his life then got “diagnosed” and given toxic chemotherapy and you can see what happened to him Nothing against this guy wish him the best of course - but indicative of the completely backwards nature of chemo/cancer “treatment” If he was healthy before the “diagnosis” and the treatment got him to that, of what good is the treatment? He maybe could have had better health before but I will stand by the fact that any treatment that makes you feel worse - let alone to the point of thinking you were going to die is never going to help your body deal with whatever is going on
0:29

Dude was healthy living his life then got “diagnosed” and given toxic chemotherapy and you can see what happened to him Nothing against this guy wish him the best of course - but indicative of the completely backwards nature of chemo/cancer “treatment” If he was healthy before the “diagnosis” and the treatment got him to that, of what good is the treatment? He maybe could have had better health before but I will stand by the fact that any treatment that makes you feel worse - let alone to the point of thinking you were going to die is never going to help your body deal with whatever is going on

⚡️🌞 Sol Brah 🌞🐬

22,249 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🔥🚨BREAKING Jay Matthews A licensed pharmacist, revealed that his daughter, Selena was diagnosed with cancer and was threatened to be kidnapped by Big Pharma if they didn’t consent to chemo. This resulted in his daughter losing her arm. Jay and his wife felt that chemo was a ‘barbaric option’ with a grim prognosis with amputation being almost certain. The state of Illinois took custody, forced the toxic treatment, and ultimately, this beautiful 8-year-old girl lost her arm. This is beyond criminal! There is a better way to treat cancer. This should NEVER happen to any child. Watch The Truth About Cancer: A Global Quest in my comment below to learn what you need to know so this never happens to you or anyone you love.
2:06

🔥🚨BREAKING Jay Matthews A licensed pharmacist, revealed that his daughter, Selena was diagnosed with cancer and was threatened to be kidnapped by Big Pharma if they didn’t consent to chemo. This resulted in his daughter losing her arm. Jay and his wife felt that chemo was a ‘barbaric option’ with a grim prognosis with amputation being almost certain. The state of Illinois took custody, forced the toxic treatment, and ultimately, this beautiful 8-year-old girl lost her arm. This is beyond criminal! There is a better way to treat cancer. This should NEVER happen to any child. Watch The Truth About Cancer: A Global Quest in my comment below to learn what you need to know so this never happens to you or anyone you love.

Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

470,780 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

If you are still naive and think they are trying to cure cancer, watch the documentary on Dr. Burzynski and his cancer cure. It is one of many cures that will work depending on the type of cancer. Also, it is made from urine and I have come to believe that urine therapy is another hidden cure for cancer and many other diseases. It isn’t known simply because people aren’t trying it. If you have cancer, research it. If you are on your deathbed, try it. You have nothing to lose. And one more thing, St Jude is in on this evil coverup.
2:55

If you are still naive and think they are trying to cure cancer, watch the documentary on Dr. Burzynski and his cancer cure. It is one of many cures that will work depending on the type of cancer. Also, it is made from urine and I have come to believe that urine therapy is another hidden cure for cancer and many other diseases. It isn’t known simply because people aren’t trying it. If you have cancer, research it. If you are on your deathbed, try it. You have nothing to lose. And one more thing, St Jude is in on this evil coverup.

Victor Scott

51,934 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten