Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Dr. Thomas Seyfried drops a bombshell: "We haven't advanced glioblastoma treatment in 100 years—yet standard radiation/chemo often accelerates patient death by flooding tumors with glucose & glutamine." His team's new open-access protocol (metabolic therapy: keto + glutamine targeting) turns deadly brain cancer manageable—not "cured," but indolent. Proof? Patient Pablo...

newstart_2024's profile picture

Camus

454,637 subscribers

62,484 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

Sağlık & İyilikEğitimBilim & Teknoloji
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Cancer’s fuel is glucose + glutamine. Starve both → tumors choke and die. Thomas Seyfried: “We have not found a single tumor that can survive without glucose and glutamine. Put the body into nutritional ketosis (low sugar, high ketones/fatty acids) and the cancer cells get hammered. Metabolic therapy should be first-line for every patient.” At the end, maybe a small touch of radiation/chemo/immunotherapy to mop up stragglers—but the foundation is metabolic. Tumor cells are metabolically inflexible. Normal cells thrive on ketones; cancer cells cannot. Transition the body’s fuel source → cancer suffocates. If metabolic therapy (ketogenic diet + glutamine targeting) is this powerful, why isn’t it standard protocol? What’s your take—would you push for metabolic therapy first if diagnosed? Or have you seen / tried keto in cancer contexts? Your thoughts 👇
0:59

Cancer’s fuel is glucose + glutamine. Starve both → tumors choke and die. Thomas Seyfried: “We have not found a single tumor that can survive without glucose and glutamine. Put the body into nutritional ketosis (low sugar, high ketones/fatty acids) and the cancer cells get hammered. Metabolic therapy should be first-line for every patient.” At the end, maybe a small touch of radiation/chemo/immunotherapy to mop up stragglers—but the foundation is metabolic. Tumor cells are metabolically inflexible. Normal cells thrive on ketones; cancer cells cannot. Transition the body’s fuel source → cancer suffocates. If metabolic therapy (ketogenic diet + glutamine targeting) is this powerful, why isn’t it standard protocol? What’s your take—would you push for metabolic therapy first if diagnosed? Or have you seen / tried keto in cancer contexts? Your thoughts 👇

Camus

325,004 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

Dr. Thomas Seyfried, a leading cancer researcher and speaker, with Christos Shernopoulos from Semmelweis University, has redefined cancer as a mitochondrial metabolic disease, not genetic. His talks reveal that cancer cells ferment glucose and glutamine to survive. Seyfried builds on Otto Warburg’s findings, showing cancer stems from damaged oxidative phosphorylation, triggering fermentation. Environmental factors like hypoxia, carcinogens, viruses, and inflammation disrupt mitochondria, a common mechanism across all cancers. Seyfried’s discussions challenge the genetic theory, exposing its flaws: some tumors lack mutations, driver genes exist in normal tissues without causing cancer, and nuclear transfer experiments show tumor behavior depends on cytoplasm, not the nucleus. He attributes the genetic dogma to confirmation bias. Seyfried notes a tragic consequence: 1,700 daily U.S. cancer deaths stem from treatments based on a flawed genetic model. He advocates metabolic therapy, starving tumors by lowering glucose and glutamine while elevating ketone bodies, which cancer cells cannot use. Seyfried explains the Press-Pulse Therapeutic Strategy, developed with Dominic D’Agostino, George Yu, and Joseph Maroon. His talks detail how this approach presses glucose down through ketosis and pulses glutamine with drugs, offering a non-toxic way to manage cancer, pioneered at Boston College. Seyfried warns that medical schools do not teach cancer as a metabolic disease, leaving oncologists untrained in this approach. He calls for a revenue model to replace toxic treatments with metabolic therapies, urging a paradigm shift to save lives. Through his speaking engagements, Seyfried envisions a future where cancer loses its fear through effective, non-toxic management. He demands physician training and public awareness to adopt metabolic approaches, simplifying a disease overcomplicated by outdated theories.
6:14

Dr. Thomas Seyfried, a leading cancer researcher and speaker, with Christos Shernopoulos from Semmelweis University, has redefined cancer as a mitochondrial metabolic disease, not genetic. His talks reveal that cancer cells ferment glucose and glutamine to survive. Seyfried builds on Otto Warburg’s findings, showing cancer stems from damaged oxidative phosphorylation, triggering fermentation. Environmental factors like hypoxia, carcinogens, viruses, and inflammation disrupt mitochondria, a common mechanism across all cancers. Seyfried’s discussions challenge the genetic theory, exposing its flaws: some tumors lack mutations, driver genes exist in normal tissues without causing cancer, and nuclear transfer experiments show tumor behavior depends on cytoplasm, not the nucleus. He attributes the genetic dogma to confirmation bias. Seyfried notes a tragic consequence: 1,700 daily U.S. cancer deaths stem from treatments based on a flawed genetic model. He advocates metabolic therapy, starving tumors by lowering glucose and glutamine while elevating ketone bodies, which cancer cells cannot use. Seyfried explains the Press-Pulse Therapeutic Strategy, developed with Dominic D’Agostino, George Yu, and Joseph Maroon. His talks detail how this approach presses glucose down through ketosis and pulses glutamine with drugs, offering a non-toxic way to manage cancer, pioneered at Boston College. Seyfried warns that medical schools do not teach cancer as a metabolic disease, leaving oncologists untrained in this approach. He calls for a revenue model to replace toxic treatments with metabolic therapies, urging a paradigm shift to save lives. Through his speaking engagements, Seyfried envisions a future where cancer loses its fear through effective, non-toxic management. He demands physician training and public awareness to adopt metabolic approaches, simplifying a disease overcomplicated by outdated theories.

Camus

74,454 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

World-renowned cancer researcher Dr. Thomas Seyfried just dropped one of the most provocative statements you’ll hear from a tenured professor: “No tumor we have ever studied — and I’ve published the papers — can survive without glucose and glutamine. Starve those two fuels, put the body into nutritional ketosis with ketone levels the cancer cells can’t use, and the tumor cells get hammered and slowly die. At the very end you might need a touch of radiation or a little chemo to mop up the stragglers — but why isn’t metabolic therapy the FIRST line of attack for every patient?” Watch the 60-second clip below — he says it even more directly. This is the same Boston College professor who’s been publishing this metabolic theory of cancer for 15+ years and claims most cancers are a mitochondrial metabolic disease, not primarily a genetic one. Oncologists: what’s the strongest counter-evidence to his claims? Patients & researchers: have you seen this approach used in practice? Drop studies, critiques, or real-world experience — I read every reply. (Sharing a scientist’s public statements only — this is not medical advice)
0:59

World-renowned cancer researcher Dr. Thomas Seyfried just dropped one of the most provocative statements you’ll hear from a tenured professor: “No tumor we have ever studied — and I’ve published the papers — can survive without glucose and glutamine. Starve those two fuels, put the body into nutritional ketosis with ketone levels the cancer cells can’t use, and the tumor cells get hammered and slowly die. At the very end you might need a touch of radiation or a little chemo to mop up the stragglers — but why isn’t metabolic therapy the FIRST line of attack for every patient?” Watch the 60-second clip below — he says it even more directly. This is the same Boston College professor who’s been publishing this metabolic theory of cancer for 15+ years and claims most cancers are a mitochondrial metabolic disease, not primarily a genetic one. Oncologists: what’s the strongest counter-evidence to his claims? Patients & researchers: have you seen this approach used in practice? Drop studies, critiques, or real-world experience — I read every reply. (Sharing a scientist’s public statements only — this is not medical advice)

Camus

448,553 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

Dr. Thomas Seyfried drops a bombshell: "Cancer is very preventable... we're doing everything we possibly can to induce it in our diet & lifestyle." He flips the script: Cancer isn't primarily genetic—it's a metabolic disease rooted in damaged mitochondria forcing cells to ferment glucose and glutamine for energy. Key points from the clip: - Higher blood sugar = faster tumor growth (his early research showed this clearly). - Cancer cells rely on glucose + glutamine (they have faulty mitochondria). - Solution? Restrict both fuels via low-carb/ketogenic diet + fasting → enter nutritional ketosis. - Healthy cells thrive on ketone bodies; tumors starve slowly, lose blood supply, and get dissolved by the body. Non-toxic management potential: Target metabolism instead of (or alongside) traditional treatments. (Backed by his decades of work, including case studies & animal models on restricted ketogenic approaches—though mainstream oncology debates it as adjunct, not cure-all.) Mind-blowing rethink: What if prevention starts with blood sugar control and ditching high-carb lifestyles? Have you explored keto/fasting for health reasons? Seen any personal changes—or know someone who's tried metabolic approaches? Share experiences respectfully below!
0:56

Dr. Thomas Seyfried drops a bombshell: "Cancer is very preventable... we're doing everything we possibly can to induce it in our diet & lifestyle." He flips the script: Cancer isn't primarily genetic—it's a metabolic disease rooted in damaged mitochondria forcing cells to ferment glucose and glutamine for energy. Key points from the clip: - Higher blood sugar = faster tumor growth (his early research showed this clearly). - Cancer cells rely on glucose + glutamine (they have faulty mitochondria). - Solution? Restrict both fuels via low-carb/ketogenic diet + fasting → enter nutritional ketosis. - Healthy cells thrive on ketone bodies; tumors starve slowly, lose blood supply, and get dissolved by the body. Non-toxic management potential: Target metabolism instead of (or alongside) traditional treatments. (Backed by his decades of work, including case studies & animal models on restricted ketogenic approaches—though mainstream oncology debates it as adjunct, not cure-all.) Mind-blowing rethink: What if prevention starts with blood sugar control and ditching high-carb lifestyles? Have you explored keto/fasting for health reasons? Seen any personal changes—or know someone who's tried metabolic approaches? Share experiences respectfully below!

Camus

65,965 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

This 5-minute clip will stop you in your tracks. World-leading cancer metabolism researcher Dr. Thomas Seyfried (Boston College professor, 300+ published papers) explains why he is convinced cancer is fundamentally a mitochondrial metabolic disease — not primarily a genetic one. Most powerful moment: “When the tumor is first shrunk using metabolic therapy (strict carbohydrate restriction + therapeutic ketosis), the surgeon walks in and says: ‘My God… the margins are sharp. It’s like removing a wart.’” Other highlights from the interview: - Aggressive, highly inflammatory tumors rapidly become quiet, well-defined, and far easier to resect cleanly - Many patients report feeling dramatically better during the protocol — the opposite of conventional treatment toxicity - Childhood brain tumors are especially tragic: even when “successful,” current protocols often leave kids with permanent severe damage - “We already know the only two fuels driving dysregulated growth (glucose & glutamine), yet the majority of research funding still chases largely irrelevant gene mutations.” Dr. Seyfried repeatedly clarifies he is a basic-science researcher, not a treating physician, and is simply reporting published science plus feedback he receives from clinics applying these principles. His prediction: “Metabolic approaches will eventually become the standard of care — not because they are alternative, but because the patient outcomes are already substantially better.” 5-minute clip (October 2025 interview) — first time posted with this excerpt ↓ Worth every second.
5:48

This 5-minute clip will stop you in your tracks. World-leading cancer metabolism researcher Dr. Thomas Seyfried (Boston College professor, 300+ published papers) explains why he is convinced cancer is fundamentally a mitochondrial metabolic disease — not primarily a genetic one. Most powerful moment: “When the tumor is first shrunk using metabolic therapy (strict carbohydrate restriction + therapeutic ketosis), the surgeon walks in and says: ‘My God… the margins are sharp. It’s like removing a wart.’” Other highlights from the interview: - Aggressive, highly inflammatory tumors rapidly become quiet, well-defined, and far easier to resect cleanly - Many patients report feeling dramatically better during the protocol — the opposite of conventional treatment toxicity - Childhood brain tumors are especially tragic: even when “successful,” current protocols often leave kids with permanent severe damage - “We already know the only two fuels driving dysregulated growth (glucose & glutamine), yet the majority of research funding still chases largely irrelevant gene mutations.” Dr. Seyfried repeatedly clarifies he is a basic-science researcher, not a treating physician, and is simply reporting published science plus feedback he receives from clinics applying these principles. His prediction: “Metabolic approaches will eventually become the standard of care — not because they are alternative, but because the patient outcomes are already substantially better.” 5-minute clip (October 2025 interview) — first time posted with this excerpt ↓ Worth every second.

Camus

83,047 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

🚨 It's shocking how many people go through chemo and radiation only to eventually die from the treatment — not the cancer itself. Sergeant Ric Schiff, a San Francisco police officer, told this heartbreaking story in court: One of his twin daughters Crystin was diagnosed with a brain tumor at just 4 years old. Doctors gave her aggressive chemo and radiation, warning it had a high chance of killing her. She miraculously survived the treatment… but the cancer remained. They were told she didn’t have long to live. Desperate for another option, they found Dr. Stanislaw Burzynski and his non-toxic antineoplastons therapy. The cancer was cured. But it was too late. The massive radiation and chemo had already caused irreversible brain deterioration. Crystin died from the damage caused by the conventional treatment — not the cancer. Sergeant Schiff believes real cures have been hidden and that the system profits from keeping people alive just long enough to keep paying for toxic treatments. This is one of the most powerful testimonies you’ll ever hear. Watch it here:
1:29

🚨 It's shocking how many people go through chemo and radiation only to eventually die from the treatment — not the cancer itself. Sergeant Ric Schiff, a San Francisco police officer, told this heartbreaking story in court: One of his twin daughters Crystin was diagnosed with a brain tumor at just 4 years old. Doctors gave her aggressive chemo and radiation, warning it had a high chance of killing her. She miraculously survived the treatment… but the cancer remained. They were told she didn’t have long to live. Desperate for another option, they found Dr. Stanislaw Burzynski and his non-toxic antineoplastons therapy. The cancer was cured. But it was too late. The massive radiation and chemo had already caused irreversible brain deterioration. Crystin died from the damage caused by the conventional treatment — not the cancer. Sergeant Schiff believes real cures have been hidden and that the system profits from keeping people alive just long enough to keep paying for toxic treatments. This is one of the most powerful testimonies you’ll ever hear. Watch it here:

Dr. Dawn Michael

41,960 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

The Unspoken Protocol: A Metabolic Revolution in Cancer Care What if our fundamental understanding of cancer is wrong? What if it's not hundreds of disparate diseases, but one single disease of energy metabolism? Pioneering researcher Dr. Thomas Seyfried presents a paradigm-shifting view that is both elegant and devastatingly simple. His decades of research, backed by a "granite base" of scientific evidence, point to two primary fuels that drive all cancers: 1. Glucose: The sugar in your blood. The higher the blood sugar, the faster and more aggressively tumors grow—a finding consistent across brain, breast, pancreatic, and lung cancers. 2. Glutamine: An abundant amino acid in the bloodstream. According to Seyfried, cancer cells are "sugar and glutamine junkies." They voraciously consume these two fuels to fuel their dysregulated growth. But here’s the revolutionary therapeutic strategy: Starve the cancer, feed the body. By strategically lowering blood glucose through dietary approaches (e.g., therapeutic ketosis), the body is forced to transition to an alternative fuel: ketone bodies. Normal, healthy cells thrive on ketones. Cancer cells, with their damaged mitochondria, cannot use them effectively. The result? A metabolic standoff where the body enters an "energized state," healthy cells become more robust, and the tumor is systematically weakened. The final piece of the puzzle is targeting the second fuel, glutamine, with precision drugs, creating a powerful, synergistic attack. The most stunning part? This metabolic approach doesn't just target the tumor. Patients see concurrent improvements in type 2 diabetes, high blood pressure, and other metabolic disorders. It's a holistic reset. Yet, as Seyfried starkly notes, despite the "rock solid" science, this protocol is not available in any clinical trial worldwide. We have a potent, logical, and data-driven pathway to manage this disease, and it remains on the sidelines. The question is no longer if the metabolism-based model is valid, but when the medical establishment will have the courage to embrace it.
4:33

The Unspoken Protocol: A Metabolic Revolution in Cancer Care What if our fundamental understanding of cancer is wrong? What if it's not hundreds of disparate diseases, but one single disease of energy metabolism? Pioneering researcher Dr. Thomas Seyfried presents a paradigm-shifting view that is both elegant and devastatingly simple. His decades of research, backed by a "granite base" of scientific evidence, point to two primary fuels that drive all cancers: 1. Glucose: The sugar in your blood. The higher the blood sugar, the faster and more aggressively tumors grow—a finding consistent across brain, breast, pancreatic, and lung cancers. 2. Glutamine: An abundant amino acid in the bloodstream. According to Seyfried, cancer cells are "sugar and glutamine junkies." They voraciously consume these two fuels to fuel their dysregulated growth. But here’s the revolutionary therapeutic strategy: Starve the cancer, feed the body. By strategically lowering blood glucose through dietary approaches (e.g., therapeutic ketosis), the body is forced to transition to an alternative fuel: ketone bodies. Normal, healthy cells thrive on ketones. Cancer cells, with their damaged mitochondria, cannot use them effectively. The result? A metabolic standoff where the body enters an "energized state," healthy cells become more robust, and the tumor is systematically weakened. The final piece of the puzzle is targeting the second fuel, glutamine, with precision drugs, creating a powerful, synergistic attack. The most stunning part? This metabolic approach doesn't just target the tumor. Patients see concurrent improvements in type 2 diabetes, high blood pressure, and other metabolic disorders. It's a holistic reset. Yet, as Seyfried starkly notes, despite the "rock solid" science, this protocol is not available in any clinical trial worldwide. We have a potent, logical, and data-driven pathway to manage this disease, and it remains on the sidelines. The question is no longer if the metabolism-based model is valid, but when the medical establishment will have the courage to embrace it.

Camus

59,563 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

"1,700 People In The US Die Everyday From Cancer...That's 70 Every Hour." Dr Thomas Seyfried, PhD "Cancer Is A very Preventable Disorder. It's Within Your Control...It Is Not Genetic, Cancer Is A Metabolic Disease." Toxic Chemotherapy & Radiation Will Never Lower Cancer Rates. "The Problem Is Our Modern Lifestyle & Habits, We're Doing Everything Wrong. We're Inducing Cancer." "Cancer Is A Very Preventable Disorder. It's Within Your Control, Your Lifestyle, Your Habits." "When The Medical Establishment Acknowledges What I Know About This Disorder, What's Causing It & What We're Not Doing To Prevent It Or Treat It...It Will Be Recognized As The Greatest Tragedy In The History Of Medicine." "We Can Prevent It & Treat It With Metabolic Therapy. You Can Take Away The Risk & Fear Of Getting Cancer." Chemotherapy & Radiation have not reduced cancer rates. 1,700 people die everyday from cancer, that's 70 people every hour. Ketogenic Metabolic Cancer Prevention/Treatment: 1: Fasting For Autophagy & Mitochondrial Health 2: Carbohydrate Restriction/Glucose Elimination 3: Remove Inflammatory Toxic Seed Oils 4: Remove Processed Foods 5: Exercise To Induce Ketosis 6: Targeted Protocol For Cancer(Linked Below) Dr Thomas Seyfried Thomas N. Seyfried is a Professor of Biology, Genetics & Biochemistry at Boston College. He has over 150 peer-reviewed publications & the author of "Cancer as a Metabolic Disease: On the Origin, Management & Prevention of Cancer." "All Major Research Centers Believe Cancer Is A Genetic Disease. But That Belief Is In Stark Contrast To The Data. The Evidence Is Massive To Support That Cancer Is A Metabolic Disorder." "Wolves In The Wild Don't Die Of Cancer, Yet Our Pets #1 Killer Is Cancer. Their Food & Lifestyle Is Killing Them Too." "The Greatest Tragedy In The History Of Medicine Is Knowing The Cause Of Cancer & Yet The Medical Establishment Is Not Advising Changing Lifestyle To Prevent It Or As A Treatment." 👇Fasting/Ketogenic/Ivermectin Cancer Protocol👇 👇Dr Seyfried Case Report Curing Canine Cancer👇 👇Ketogenic Diet Lung/Brain Cancer Remission👇 Podcast: DiaryOfaCEO Video: @superfoodmood
1:00

"1,700 People In The US Die Everyday From Cancer...That's 70 Every Hour." Dr Thomas Seyfried, PhD "Cancer Is A very Preventable Disorder. It's Within Your Control...It Is Not Genetic, Cancer Is A Metabolic Disease." Toxic Chemotherapy & Radiation Will Never Lower Cancer Rates. "The Problem Is Our Modern Lifestyle & Habits, We're Doing Everything Wrong. We're Inducing Cancer." "Cancer Is A Very Preventable Disorder. It's Within Your Control, Your Lifestyle, Your Habits." "When The Medical Establishment Acknowledges What I Know About This Disorder, What's Causing It & What We're Not Doing To Prevent It Or Treat It...It Will Be Recognized As The Greatest Tragedy In The History Of Medicine." "We Can Prevent It & Treat It With Metabolic Therapy. You Can Take Away The Risk & Fear Of Getting Cancer." Chemotherapy & Radiation have not reduced cancer rates. 1,700 people die everyday from cancer, that's 70 people every hour. Ketogenic Metabolic Cancer Prevention/Treatment: 1: Fasting For Autophagy & Mitochondrial Health 2: Carbohydrate Restriction/Glucose Elimination 3: Remove Inflammatory Toxic Seed Oils 4: Remove Processed Foods 5: Exercise To Induce Ketosis 6: Targeted Protocol For Cancer(Linked Below) Dr Thomas Seyfried Thomas N. Seyfried is a Professor of Biology, Genetics & Biochemistry at Boston College. He has over 150 peer-reviewed publications & the author of "Cancer as a Metabolic Disease: On the Origin, Management & Prevention of Cancer." "All Major Research Centers Believe Cancer Is A Genetic Disease. But That Belief Is In Stark Contrast To The Data. The Evidence Is Massive To Support That Cancer Is A Metabolic Disorder." "Wolves In The Wild Don't Die Of Cancer, Yet Our Pets #1 Killer Is Cancer. Their Food & Lifestyle Is Killing Them Too." "The Greatest Tragedy In The History Of Medicine Is Knowing The Cause Of Cancer & Yet The Medical Establishment Is Not Advising Changing Lifestyle To Prevent It Or As A Treatment." 👇Fasting/Ketogenic/Ivermectin Cancer Protocol👇 👇Dr Seyfried Case Report Curing Canine Cancer👇 👇Ketogenic Diet Lung/Brain Cancer Remission👇 Podcast: DiaryOfaCEO Video: @superfoodmood

Valerie Anne Smith

198,205 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Dr. Mark Hyman & Dr. Thomas Seyfried just made a bombshell claim about cancer treatment: “The most powerful therapy we have is diet — and it has zero toxicity, only massive side benefits.” Hyman: Current treatments (chemo, radiation, surgery) are toxic and crude. Metabolic oncology flips the script: Use diet + targeted compounds to block cancer’s fermentation pathways (Warburg effect). No side effects — instead, you get reduced inflammation, better stem cell function, DNA repair, less oxidative stress, and overall metabolic renewal. Seyfried ties it deeper: Most chronic diseases (cancer, diabetes, heart disease, dementia) stem from the same root — disturbed energy metabolism + systemic inflammation from modern life (chemicals, poor diet, etc.). The solution? Restore metabolic homeostasis — starting with what you eat. In an era of endless toxic treatments, this approach feels revolutionary. Are we finally seeing the beginning of the end of “poison to cure poison” cancer care? What’s your biggest takeaway from this metabolic shift?
0:58

Dr. Mark Hyman & Dr. Thomas Seyfried just made a bombshell claim about cancer treatment: “The most powerful therapy we have is diet — and it has zero toxicity, only massive side benefits.” Hyman: Current treatments (chemo, radiation, surgery) are toxic and crude. Metabolic oncology flips the script: Use diet + targeted compounds to block cancer’s fermentation pathways (Warburg effect). No side effects — instead, you get reduced inflammation, better stem cell function, DNA repair, less oxidative stress, and overall metabolic renewal. Seyfried ties it deeper: Most chronic diseases (cancer, diabetes, heart disease, dementia) stem from the same root — disturbed energy metabolism + systemic inflammation from modern life (chemicals, poor diet, etc.). The solution? Restore metabolic homeostasis — starting with what you eat. In an era of endless toxic treatments, this approach feels revolutionary. Are we finally seeing the beginning of the end of “poison to cure poison” cancer care? What’s your biggest takeaway from this metabolic shift?

Camus

29,215 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

What if a $5 dog dewormer could outsmart cancer's deadly fuel hack—while Big Pharma's $100K chemo flops? Dr. Thomas Seyfried just exposed 2025's oncology earthquake in this explosive 2:23 clip. Cancer pioneer Seyfried—author of Cancer as a Metabolic Disease—reveals why antiparasitics Fenbendazole and Mebendazole (structural twins) crush tumors: They both devour glucose and glutamine via the same glitchy energy pathway parasites use. "The drug doesn't discriminate—worm or rogue cell, it starves the shared scam," Seyfried says. Myth busted: Cancer isn't a parasite, but it mimics one, "settling" in tissues and guzzling glutamine like a pro. Routine in India for worms, these meds unknowingly torpedo tumors too. 2025 fire: Seyfried's team bioRxiv paper confirms Mebendazole nukes both pathways. Fenben mirrors it. Colleague hunch? Mebendazole for brain, Fenben for colon—equals in efficacy. Cocktails amplify. Press-Pulse Protocol turbo: Keto (starve glucose, flood ketones) + HBOT skyrockets kills Exploding remissions: 407 Fenben cases (Dec 2025 comp); peer-reviewed trio—breast/prostate/melanoma—hit full/near remission sans chemo; Stunners: 59yo SC woman, 91% NSCLC shrink in 3mo (Fenben/Meben combo); 69yo PA, 88% brain mets gone; 270 Stage 4 wins; Seyfried/Khadka glutaminolysis kill-switch nails it. Profit elephant: "Repackage 50¢ pills for $300," Seyfried blasts. 2025 METRICS trials signal shift—affordable hope vs. toxic roulette. Watch Seyfried mic-drop: Metabolic matchup of the century. Tried keto tweaks? Brain or colon—which wins?
2:23

What if a $5 dog dewormer could outsmart cancer's deadly fuel hack—while Big Pharma's $100K chemo flops? Dr. Thomas Seyfried just exposed 2025's oncology earthquake in this explosive 2:23 clip. Cancer pioneer Seyfried—author of Cancer as a Metabolic Disease—reveals why antiparasitics Fenbendazole and Mebendazole (structural twins) crush tumors: They both devour glucose and glutamine via the same glitchy energy pathway parasites use. "The drug doesn't discriminate—worm or rogue cell, it starves the shared scam," Seyfried says. Myth busted: Cancer isn't a parasite, but it mimics one, "settling" in tissues and guzzling glutamine like a pro. Routine in India for worms, these meds unknowingly torpedo tumors too. 2025 fire: Seyfried's team bioRxiv paper confirms Mebendazole nukes both pathways. Fenben mirrors it. Colleague hunch? Mebendazole for brain, Fenben for colon—equals in efficacy. Cocktails amplify. Press-Pulse Protocol turbo: Keto (starve glucose, flood ketones) + HBOT skyrockets kills Exploding remissions: 407 Fenben cases (Dec 2025 comp); peer-reviewed trio—breast/prostate/melanoma—hit full/near remission sans chemo; Stunners: 59yo SC woman, 91% NSCLC shrink in 3mo (Fenben/Meben combo); 69yo PA, 88% brain mets gone; 270 Stage 4 wins; Seyfried/Khadka glutaminolysis kill-switch nails it. Profit elephant: "Repackage 50¢ pills for $300," Seyfried blasts. 2025 METRICS trials signal shift—affordable hope vs. toxic roulette. Watch Seyfried mic-drop: Metabolic matchup of the century. Tried keto tweaks? Brain or colon—which wins?

Camus

101,441 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong to Megyn Kelly: For 75 years we've treated cancer like a war—nuking tumors with poisons (chemo) and radiation while simultaneously destroying the immune system's natural killer cells and T-cells. The vicious cycle: Chemo → anemia → give Epogen → more chemo → wipe out neutrophils → give Neupogen → more chemo → destroy more lymphocytes/NK cells. FDA's gold standard? Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) — push the poison just below what kills the patient, measure tumor shrinkage (response rate), but ignore overall survival. Soon-Shiong: “The tumor shrinks… but the patient dies. We’re not really interested in overall survival as an endpoint. That is today’s thinking.” Megyn Kelly: “It seems to be a willing choice because we’ve gone so long without making much progress.” Clip from this 2:33 bombshell — the cancer “war” paradigm laid bare. Is MTD + response-rate obsession the reason we’re still losing the fight? Or is this the best we’ve got until something radically better arrives? Your take—seriously, drop it below.
2:33

Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong to Megyn Kelly: For 75 years we've treated cancer like a war—nuking tumors with poisons (chemo) and radiation while simultaneously destroying the immune system's natural killer cells and T-cells. The vicious cycle: Chemo → anemia → give Epogen → more chemo → wipe out neutrophils → give Neupogen → more chemo → destroy more lymphocytes/NK cells. FDA's gold standard? Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) — push the poison just below what kills the patient, measure tumor shrinkage (response rate), but ignore overall survival. Soon-Shiong: “The tumor shrinks… but the patient dies. We’re not really interested in overall survival as an endpoint. That is today’s thinking.” Megyn Kelly: “It seems to be a willing choice because we’ve gone so long without making much progress.” Clip from this 2:33 bombshell — the cancer “war” paradigm laid bare. Is MTD + response-rate obsession the reason we’re still losing the fight? Or is this the best we’ve got until something radically better arrives? Your take—seriously, drop it below.

Camus

29,299 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

A Physicians Survey Revealed 88.3% Of Doctors Would Refuse Chemotherapy For Their Own Cancer Treatment. The 5 Year Chemo Survival Rate Is Only 2.1%, Yet Most Oncologists Only Offer 'Standard Of Care' To Patients. Dr Seyfried Would Choose The Protocol With Ivermectin & Fasting. American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Board of Directors has data that oncologists THEMSELVES would not take chemotherapy for cancer even though they advise chemo & radiation as the only 'approved' treatment to their patients. MacKillop & colleagues found that a survey of Canadian doctors who treat lung cancer, only 16% would want chemotherapy for their own treatment if they had a cancer diagnosis. Lind & colleagues interviewed teaching oncologists in Boston & found that only 27% would take chemo for lung cancer. "The contribution of cytotoxic chemotherapy to 5-year survival in adult malignancies" cites...The overall contribution of curative & adjuvant cytotoxic chemotherapy to 5-year survival in adults is only 2.3% in Australia & 2.1% in the USA. Cancer treatment is a multi-billion dollar industry. Most oncologists believe that cancer is genetic, but cancer is a metabolic disease. Doctors don’t study nutrition or metabolic therapy & don't even know that chemotherapy historically was a 'weapon of war' mustard gas. Banned from use in war because it is cytotoxic & too inhumane, even against war enemies. The system profits more from lifelong chemo & radiation than natural intervention. Chemotherapy is not the answer to heal the body of cancer. GKI Glucose Ketone Index & Cancer Eradication Based On Otto Warburg's Groundbreaking Research: Cancer cells are metabolically inflexible & cannot use ketone bodies for energy when glucose is limited, unlike healthy cells. A low GKI is achieved by restricting carbohydrates, which lowers blood glucose & increases ketone production. This starves cancer cells of glucose while providing normal cells with an alternative energy source. Research shows a low glucose environment promotes our Natural Killer (NK) cells & T-cells to become even stronger which are crucial for killing cancer. Chemotherapy & radiation actually kills our NK Natural Killer Cells allowing cancer to return even stronger than before conventional treatment. 15 expert physicians & oncologists have published...'Targeting the Mitochondrial-Stem Cell Connection in Cancer Treatment: A Hybrid Orthomolecular Protocol.' This is the step by step protocol of fasting, high fat ketogenic diet (eliminating glucose) & using ivermectin, fenbendazole & supportive nutrients with lifestyle changes for cancer treatment remission. This protocol, along with cited research is linked in the replies. Have you used non traditional methods to reverse cancer? Is your cancer in remission thanks to fasting, ivermectin or other alternative protocols?
1:25

A Physicians Survey Revealed 88.3% Of Doctors Would Refuse Chemotherapy For Their Own Cancer Treatment. The 5 Year Chemo Survival Rate Is Only 2.1%, Yet Most Oncologists Only Offer 'Standard Of Care' To Patients. Dr Seyfried Would Choose The Protocol With Ivermectin & Fasting. American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Board of Directors has data that oncologists THEMSELVES would not take chemotherapy for cancer even though they advise chemo & radiation as the only 'approved' treatment to their patients. MacKillop & colleagues found that a survey of Canadian doctors who treat lung cancer, only 16% would want chemotherapy for their own treatment if they had a cancer diagnosis. Lind & colleagues interviewed teaching oncologists in Boston & found that only 27% would take chemo for lung cancer. "The contribution of cytotoxic chemotherapy to 5-year survival in adult malignancies" cites...The overall contribution of curative & adjuvant cytotoxic chemotherapy to 5-year survival in adults is only 2.3% in Australia & 2.1% in the USA. Cancer treatment is a multi-billion dollar industry. Most oncologists believe that cancer is genetic, but cancer is a metabolic disease. Doctors don’t study nutrition or metabolic therapy & don't even know that chemotherapy historically was a 'weapon of war' mustard gas. Banned from use in war because it is cytotoxic & too inhumane, even against war enemies. The system profits more from lifelong chemo & radiation than natural intervention. Chemotherapy is not the answer to heal the body of cancer. GKI Glucose Ketone Index & Cancer Eradication Based On Otto Warburg's Groundbreaking Research: Cancer cells are metabolically inflexible & cannot use ketone bodies for energy when glucose is limited, unlike healthy cells. A low GKI is achieved by restricting carbohydrates, which lowers blood glucose & increases ketone production. This starves cancer cells of glucose while providing normal cells with an alternative energy source. Research shows a low glucose environment promotes our Natural Killer (NK) cells & T-cells to become even stronger which are crucial for killing cancer. Chemotherapy & radiation actually kills our NK Natural Killer Cells allowing cancer to return even stronger than before conventional treatment. 15 expert physicians & oncologists have published...'Targeting the Mitochondrial-Stem Cell Connection in Cancer Treatment: A Hybrid Orthomolecular Protocol.' This is the step by step protocol of fasting, high fat ketogenic diet (eliminating glucose) & using ivermectin, fenbendazole & supportive nutrients with lifestyle changes for cancer treatment remission. This protocol, along with cited research is linked in the replies. Have you used non traditional methods to reverse cancer? Is your cancer in remission thanks to fasting, ivermectin or other alternative protocols?

Valerie Anne Smith

262,596 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

Megyn Kelly sat down with Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong to discuss his revolutionary cancer protocol—a treatment that has already extended lives by years for patients with terminal diagnoses, including the late Senator Harry Reid. The Science Behind the Breakthrough Dr. Soon-Shiong’s approach challenges conventional cancer treatments like chemotherapy and radiation, which destroy the immune system’s natural killer (NK) cells and T-cells—critical for fighting cancer. His BioStripe treatment works by rebuilding the immune system, even in patients who have exhausted all other options. Real Patients, Miraculous Results Merkel cell carcinoma (5th-line treatment): Complete remission—patient lived 6+ years and didn’t die from cancer. Bladder cancer: Patients still alive 10-11 years later. Triple-negative breast cancer: Multiple complete remissions. Metastatic pancreatic cancer: One patient disease-free after 5 years, now 6+ years and counting. FDA Roadblocks & Lost Time Despite undeniable success, Dr. Soon-Shiong faced years of resistance from regulators. In 2015, he proposed testing his method before chemo/radiation—but the FDA insisted on starting with end-stage patients. After 700,000 pages of submissions, approval finally came in late 2024. The Future: Beyond Cancer This treatment isn’t just for cancer—it’s showing promise against sepsis and severe infections. One recent case: A Valley Fever patient on a ventilator, given last rites—fully recovered after treatment. The Urgent Question Why is bureaucracy slowing down a therapy that could save millions? With pancreatic cancer, glioblastoma, and lung cancer patients still dying every day, how many more lives could have been saved if this had been fast-tracked?
3:46

Megyn Kelly sat down with Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong to discuss his revolutionary cancer protocol—a treatment that has already extended lives by years for patients with terminal diagnoses, including the late Senator Harry Reid. The Science Behind the Breakthrough Dr. Soon-Shiong’s approach challenges conventional cancer treatments like chemotherapy and radiation, which destroy the immune system’s natural killer (NK) cells and T-cells—critical for fighting cancer. His BioStripe treatment works by rebuilding the immune system, even in patients who have exhausted all other options. Real Patients, Miraculous Results Merkel cell carcinoma (5th-line treatment): Complete remission—patient lived 6+ years and didn’t die from cancer. Bladder cancer: Patients still alive 10-11 years later. Triple-negative breast cancer: Multiple complete remissions. Metastatic pancreatic cancer: One patient disease-free after 5 years, now 6+ years and counting. FDA Roadblocks & Lost Time Despite undeniable success, Dr. Soon-Shiong faced years of resistance from regulators. In 2015, he proposed testing his method before chemo/radiation—but the FDA insisted on starting with end-stage patients. After 700,000 pages of submissions, approval finally came in late 2024. The Future: Beyond Cancer This treatment isn’t just for cancer—it’s showing promise against sepsis and severe infections. One recent case: A Valley Fever patient on a ventilator, given last rites—fully recovered after treatment. The Urgent Question Why is bureaucracy slowing down a therapy that could save millions? With pancreatic cancer, glioblastoma, and lung cancer patients still dying every day, how many more lives could have been saved if this had been fast-tracked?

Camus

615,537 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

A Physicians Survey Revealed 88.3% Of Doctors Would Refuse Chemotherapy For Their Own Cancer Treatment. The 5 Year Chemo Survival Rate Is Only 2.1%, Yet Most Oncologists Only Offer 'Standard Of Care' To Patients. Dr Seyfried Would Choose The Protocol With Ivermectin & Fasting. American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Board of Directors has data that oncologists THEMSELVES would not take chemotherapy for cancer even though they advise chemo & radiation as the only 'approved' treatment to their patients. MacKillop & colleagues found that a survey of Canadian doctors who treat lung cancer, only 16% would want chemotherapy for their own treatment if they had a cancer diagnosis. Lind & colleagues interviewed teaching oncologists in Boston & found that only 27% would take chemo for lung cancer. "The contribution of cytotoxic chemotherapy to 5-year survival in adult malignancies" cites...The overall contribution of curative & adjuvant cytotoxic chemotherapy to 5-year survival in adults is only 2.3% in Australia & 2.1% in the USA. Cancer treatment is a multi-billion dollar industry. Most oncologists believe that cancer is genetic, but cancer is a metabolic disease. Doctors don’t study nutrition or metabolic therapy & don't even know that chemotherapy historically was a 'weapon of war' mustard gas. Banned from use in war because it is cytotoxic & too inhumane, even against war enemies. The system profits more from lifelong chemo & radiation than natural intervention. Chemotherapy is not the answer to heal the body of cancer. GKI Glucose Ketone Index & Cancer Eradication Based On Otto Warburg's Groundbreaking Research: Cancer cells are metabolically inflexible & cannot use ketone bodies for energy when glucose is limited, unlike healthy cells. A low GKI is achieved by restricting carbohydrates, which lowers blood glucose & increases ketone production. This starves cancer cells of glucose while providing normal cells with an alternative energy source. Research shows a low glucose environment promotes our Natural Killer (NK) cells & T-cells to become even stronger which are crucial for killing cancer. Chemotherapy & radiation actually kills our NK Natural Killer Cells allowing cancer to return even stronger than before conventional treatment. 15 expert physicians & oncologists have published...'Targeting the Mitochondrial-Stem Cell Connection in Cancer Treatment: A Hybrid Orthomolecular Protocol.' This is the step by step protocol of fasting, high fat ketogenic diet (eliminating glucose) & using ivermectin, fenbendazole & supportive nutrients with lifestyle changes for cancer treatment remission. This protocol, along with cited research is linked in the replies. Have you used non traditional methods to reverse cancer? Is your cancer in remission thanks to fasting, ivermectin or other alternative protocols? Share and repost this message to increase awareness. It is essential for the public to be informed. Follow my page for further motivational and educational content.
0:59

A Physicians Survey Revealed 88.3% Of Doctors Would Refuse Chemotherapy For Their Own Cancer Treatment. The 5 Year Chemo Survival Rate Is Only 2.1%, Yet Most Oncologists Only Offer 'Standard Of Care' To Patients. Dr Seyfried Would Choose The Protocol With Ivermectin & Fasting. American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Board of Directors has data that oncologists THEMSELVES would not take chemotherapy for cancer even though they advise chemo & radiation as the only 'approved' treatment to their patients. MacKillop & colleagues found that a survey of Canadian doctors who treat lung cancer, only 16% would want chemotherapy for their own treatment if they had a cancer diagnosis. Lind & colleagues interviewed teaching oncologists in Boston & found that only 27% would take chemo for lung cancer. "The contribution of cytotoxic chemotherapy to 5-year survival in adult malignancies" cites...The overall contribution of curative & adjuvant cytotoxic chemotherapy to 5-year survival in adults is only 2.3% in Australia & 2.1% in the USA. Cancer treatment is a multi-billion dollar industry. Most oncologists believe that cancer is genetic, but cancer is a metabolic disease. Doctors don’t study nutrition or metabolic therapy & don't even know that chemotherapy historically was a 'weapon of war' mustard gas. Banned from use in war because it is cytotoxic & too inhumane, even against war enemies. The system profits more from lifelong chemo & radiation than natural intervention. Chemotherapy is not the answer to heal the body of cancer. GKI Glucose Ketone Index & Cancer Eradication Based On Otto Warburg's Groundbreaking Research: Cancer cells are metabolically inflexible & cannot use ketone bodies for energy when glucose is limited, unlike healthy cells. A low GKI is achieved by restricting carbohydrates, which lowers blood glucose & increases ketone production. This starves cancer cells of glucose while providing normal cells with an alternative energy source. Research shows a low glucose environment promotes our Natural Killer (NK) cells & T-cells to become even stronger which are crucial for killing cancer. Chemotherapy & radiation actually kills our NK Natural Killer Cells allowing cancer to return even stronger than before conventional treatment. 15 expert physicians & oncologists have published...'Targeting the Mitochondrial-Stem Cell Connection in Cancer Treatment: A Hybrid Orthomolecular Protocol.' This is the step by step protocol of fasting, high fat ketogenic diet (eliminating glucose) & using ivermectin, fenbendazole & supportive nutrients with lifestyle changes for cancer treatment remission. This protocol, along with cited research is linked in the replies. Have you used non traditional methods to reverse cancer? Is your cancer in remission thanks to fasting, ivermectin or other alternative protocols? Share and repost this message to increase awareness. It is essential for the public to be informed. Follow my page for further motivational and educational content.

Joe Tippens

47,858 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

This 70-second clip is spreading like wildfire for a reason. Chris Cuomo asks the question every cancer patient fears: “Are you just giving people false hope?” Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong doesn’t answer with words. He pulls up actual brain scans. Patient: failed surgery, failed radiation, failed chemo. Result after Anktiva + BioShield protocol: tumor visibly shrinking in months — with NO chemo and NO radiation.“ These aren’t anecdotes. These are scans.” The moment at 0:52-1:00 will stop you in your tracks. This is the same treatment that started saving “no-hope” patients back in 2015-2017 and just keeps delivering complete remissions years later. Watch the full 1:11 clip, see the proof with your own eyes, then tell me: Is this the turning point we’ve all been waiting for? Patients, doctors, caregivers — your voice matters. Drop your reaction below. This deserves to be seen by millions. (Always consult your physician — not medical advice)
1:11

This 70-second clip is spreading like wildfire for a reason. Chris Cuomo asks the question every cancer patient fears: “Are you just giving people false hope?” Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong doesn’t answer with words. He pulls up actual brain scans. Patient: failed surgery, failed radiation, failed chemo. Result after Anktiva + BioShield protocol: tumor visibly shrinking in months — with NO chemo and NO radiation.“ These aren’t anecdotes. These are scans.” The moment at 0:52-1:00 will stop you in your tracks. This is the same treatment that started saving “no-hope” patients back in 2015-2017 and just keeps delivering complete remissions years later. Watch the full 1:11 clip, see the proof with your own eyes, then tell me: Is this the turning point we’ve all been waiting for? Patients, doctors, caregivers — your voice matters. Drop your reaction below. This deserves to be seen by millions. (Always consult your physician — not medical advice)

Camus

237,819 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

The scientist who proved tumors grow faster when your blood sugar is high just dropped a truth bomb that could change everything we’ve been told about cancer. Dr. Thomas Seyfried, Professor of Biology at Boston College and one of the world’s top cancer-metabolism researchers, used to believe cancer was a genetic disease… until his own lab showed something completely different. Key moments from this 59-second clip that are blowing minds right now: - “We published one of the first papers ever: the higher your blood sugar, the faster the tumor grows. Undeniable.” - Cancer cells have broken mitochondria — they literally cannot survive on the same fuels your healthy cells thrive on. - When you lower glucose + glutamine through keto + strategic fasting, normal cells switch to ketones and feel great… but tumor cells starve. - “We can selectively marginalize these cells slowly over time. They die, blood vessels disappear, and the body dissolves them.” This is not fringe. This is published, peer-reviewed science from a scientist who has spent decades in the lab proving the metabolic theory of cancer. Watch the full 59 seconds — it’s worth every second of your time. What shocked you the most? Drop your reaction below — I read every single one.
0:59

The scientist who proved tumors grow faster when your blood sugar is high just dropped a truth bomb that could change everything we’ve been told about cancer. Dr. Thomas Seyfried, Professor of Biology at Boston College and one of the world’s top cancer-metabolism researchers, used to believe cancer was a genetic disease… until his own lab showed something completely different. Key moments from this 59-second clip that are blowing minds right now: - “We published one of the first papers ever: the higher your blood sugar, the faster the tumor grows. Undeniable.” - Cancer cells have broken mitochondria — they literally cannot survive on the same fuels your healthy cells thrive on. - When you lower glucose + glutamine through keto + strategic fasting, normal cells switch to ketones and feel great… but tumor cells starve. - “We can selectively marginalize these cells slowly over time. They die, blood vessels disappear, and the body dissolves them.” This is not fringe. This is published, peer-reviewed science from a scientist who has spent decades in the lab proving the metabolic theory of cancer. Watch the full 59 seconds — it’s worth every second of your time. What shocked you the most? Drop your reaction below — I read every single one.

Camus

275,027 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

You are being told cancer is “genetic” and that the only solutions are $500,000 checkpoint inhibitors that openly admit on TV they can kill you faster than the disease. Now listen to this 96-second clip from Dr. Thomas Seyfried, Professor of Biology at Boston College, former Harvard researcher, and one of the most cited scientists alive on cancer metabolism: “Most oncologists at Dana-Farber, MD Anderson, Sloan-Kettering, Fred Hutchinson, Moffitt… have NEVER heard that glucose is the primary driver of tumor growth.1,700 Americans die every single day while the people paid to know the biochemistry of this disease… admit they have never read the papers on metabolic therapy. Patients walk in asking about it and get told ‘there’s no evidence’ — by doctors who haven’t even opened the studies.” He then drops the line that’s going to live rent-free in millions of heads: “How can you say there’s no evidence when you haven’t read the literature to know there IS evidence?” And the kicker: “We can put patients into therapeutic ketosis and make Keytruda, Opdivo, and chemotherapy vastly less toxic… while simultaneously starving the tumor of its primary fuels: glucose and glutamine.” This is not a random podcast bro. This is the scientist whose 2012 book “Cancer as a Metabolic Disease” has been cited >3,000 times and whose papers are published in Nature, Lancet Oncology, and Science Signaling. The same establishment that ridiculed him 15 years ago is now quietly running clinical trials on ketogenic diets + standard of care because the preclinical data became impossible to ignore. Yet patients are still being mocked in the very same clinics for bringing it up. Watch these 96 seconds and ask yourself one question: If the 50-year “war on cancer” has barely moved overall survival for most solid tumors… why is a non-patentable metabolic strategy — backed by thousands of peer-reviewed papers — treated like medical heresy? 96-second clip below. Sound on.
1:36

You are being told cancer is “genetic” and that the only solutions are $500,000 checkpoint inhibitors that openly admit on TV they can kill you faster than the disease. Now listen to this 96-second clip from Dr. Thomas Seyfried, Professor of Biology at Boston College, former Harvard researcher, and one of the most cited scientists alive on cancer metabolism: “Most oncologists at Dana-Farber, MD Anderson, Sloan-Kettering, Fred Hutchinson, Moffitt… have NEVER heard that glucose is the primary driver of tumor growth.1,700 Americans die every single day while the people paid to know the biochemistry of this disease… admit they have never read the papers on metabolic therapy. Patients walk in asking about it and get told ‘there’s no evidence’ — by doctors who haven’t even opened the studies.” He then drops the line that’s going to live rent-free in millions of heads: “How can you say there’s no evidence when you haven’t read the literature to know there IS evidence?” And the kicker: “We can put patients into therapeutic ketosis and make Keytruda, Opdivo, and chemotherapy vastly less toxic… while simultaneously starving the tumor of its primary fuels: glucose and glutamine.” This is not a random podcast bro. This is the scientist whose 2012 book “Cancer as a Metabolic Disease” has been cited >3,000 times and whose papers are published in Nature, Lancet Oncology, and Science Signaling. The same establishment that ridiculed him 15 years ago is now quietly running clinical trials on ketogenic diets + standard of care because the preclinical data became impossible to ignore. Yet patients are still being mocked in the very same clinics for bringing it up. Watch these 96 seconds and ask yourself one question: If the 50-year “war on cancer” has barely moved overall survival for most solid tumors… why is a non-patentable metabolic strategy — backed by thousands of peer-reviewed papers — treated like medical heresy? 96-second clip below. Sound on.

Camus

42,919 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

🚨Big problem! Dr. Suzanne Humphries: "Here's the real sucker punch... the Covid jabs lead to increased cancer susceptibility... but SV40-associated cancer won't respond well... to chemotherapy... [in fact,] radiation makes SV40 cancer far more aggressive...." This clip of Dr. Humphries (Dr Suzanne Humphries), a medical doctor, board-certified internist, nephrologist, and co-author of Dissolving Illusions, is taken from a presentation posted to the Children's Health Defense (Children’s Health Defense) Rumble channel on November 12, 2025. ---------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "And here's the real sucker punch. So you remember how SV40 knocks out that p53 gene and protein, which I talked to you before, the cancer suppressor. And that means that not only can the Covid jabs lead to increased cancer susceptibility, right? But SV40-associated cancer won't respond well at all to chemotherapy. "And conventional cancer treatments are likely to make cancer actually go wild and not regress because p53, it actually directs cancer cells to die off. It's necessary for chemo and especially for radiation to do the killing that they're supposed to be doing. And the fact that radiation makes SV40 cancer far more aggressive is the entire reason it was used in the Get Castro project, right? You know, radiating the animals first and then doing the gain of function with radiation. That's why they did it. "So you know, this is some older material, just to show you that they've known for a long time that SV40 blocks the effect of cancer treatments. And so there have been children who have died of SV40-related brain tumors. And the parents go and they do research. And this is what they have found. And so these are articles from like 1997. "So again, this is not something that top scientists should have bypassed. So the other brain cancers and solid cancers have been found to contain the SV40. And that the SV40 binds with the tumor-suppressor gene at p53, and it actually stops those tumor cells from undergoing what's called apoptosis, A-P-O-P-T-O-S-I-S, which really means programmed cell death. And that's how you're able to get cancer to regress, you know, when you're doing whatever you're doing traditionally. "Like, even if it's like, look, we know radiation does make tumor cells regress. Do they come back later? Most of the time, yes, they do cancer, you know, chemotherapy. Like, my father got chemotherapy when he had tumors all over his body. We got nine extra months with him, so I was okay with that. But did they all come back to kill him? Yes, they did, but I got an extra nine months. "But the point being that, you get that programmed cell death. But then if there's a P— If it's an SV40-related cancer especially, you're going to wind up with probably a turbo cancer at that point. "Yeah, I'm just going to read this to you because when I said that people knew about this and there were, you know, parents of children who developed brain tumors and testified in front of Congress. This was one of the very well-educated parents. Exposing SV40-positive cancer cells to chemo and radiation does not kill the cells, but simply creates more genetic mutations, making the cancer more aggressive. The bottom line is that SV40 causes human cancer, stops orthodox cancer treatments like chemo and radiation from providing any benefit and can make the cancer even more aggressive."
3:12

🚨Big problem! Dr. Suzanne Humphries: "Here's the real sucker punch... the Covid jabs lead to increased cancer susceptibility... but SV40-associated cancer won't respond well... to chemotherapy... [in fact,] radiation makes SV40 cancer far more aggressive...." This clip of Dr. Humphries (Dr Suzanne Humphries), a medical doctor, board-certified internist, nephrologist, and co-author of Dissolving Illusions, is taken from a presentation posted to the Children's Health Defense (Children’s Health Defense) Rumble channel on November 12, 2025. ---------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "And here's the real sucker punch. So you remember how SV40 knocks out that p53 gene and protein, which I talked to you before, the cancer suppressor. And that means that not only can the Covid jabs lead to increased cancer susceptibility, right? But SV40-associated cancer won't respond well at all to chemotherapy. "And conventional cancer treatments are likely to make cancer actually go wild and not regress because p53, it actually directs cancer cells to die off. It's necessary for chemo and especially for radiation to do the killing that they're supposed to be doing. And the fact that radiation makes SV40 cancer far more aggressive is the entire reason it was used in the Get Castro project, right? You know, radiating the animals first and then doing the gain of function with radiation. That's why they did it. "So you know, this is some older material, just to show you that they've known for a long time that SV40 blocks the effect of cancer treatments. And so there have been children who have died of SV40-related brain tumors. And the parents go and they do research. And this is what they have found. And so these are articles from like 1997. "So again, this is not something that top scientists should have bypassed. So the other brain cancers and solid cancers have been found to contain the SV40. And that the SV40 binds with the tumor-suppressor gene at p53, and it actually stops those tumor cells from undergoing what's called apoptosis, A-P-O-P-T-O-S-I-S, which really means programmed cell death. And that's how you're able to get cancer to regress, you know, when you're doing whatever you're doing traditionally. "Like, even if it's like, look, we know radiation does make tumor cells regress. Do they come back later? Most of the time, yes, they do cancer, you know, chemotherapy. Like, my father got chemotherapy when he had tumors all over his body. We got nine extra months with him, so I was okay with that. But did they all come back to kill him? Yes, they did, but I got an extra nine months. "But the point being that, you get that programmed cell death. But then if there's a P— If it's an SV40-related cancer especially, you're going to wind up with probably a turbo cancer at that point. "Yeah, I'm just going to read this to you because when I said that people knew about this and there were, you know, parents of children who developed brain tumors and testified in front of Congress. This was one of the very well-educated parents. Exposing SV40-positive cancer cells to chemo and radiation does not kill the cells, but simply creates more genetic mutations, making the cancer more aggressive. The bottom line is that SV40 causes human cancer, stops orthodox cancer treatments like chemo and radiation from providing any benefit and can make the cancer even more aggressive."

Sense Receptor

54,169 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

Medical pioneer Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong unveils a paradigm-shifting approach to cancer treatment that could save millions of lives. In an interview, he revealed we already have the key: protecting the immune system FIRST. The current standard of care—chemotherapy and radiation—often destroys a patient’s lymphocytes (NK & T cells), leading to a condition called lymphopenia. For decades, over 300 studies have shown that lymphopenia predicts early mortality, not just in cancer, but in sepsis and trauma. We treat anemia, but we’ve NEVER had an approved treatment for this critical immune deficiency. Until now. Dr. Soon-Shiong’s “Bio-Shield” is that breakthrough. It’s already approved, and the results are profound: Prostate cancer patients treated with the Bio-Shield before radiation achieved complete remission while their lymphocytes were protected. An ovarian cancer patient received the full, brutal course of chemo after the Bio-Shield. Her cancer disappeared, and she proceeded to surgery with a protected immune system. The vision is simple, yet revolutionary: Mandate that ANY patient undergoing radiation or chemotherapy first receives the Bio-Shield to protect their immune system. The treatment isn’t just attacking the cancer; it’s fortifying the body’s own innate ability to fight and survive. The call to action is clear. We don't need to wait for new regulatory hurdles. We need immediate education for doctors and patients across the nation. We have the power to turn the tide. This is the future of medicine: treating the patient's immune system as the most valuable asset in the fight for their life.
2:53

Medical pioneer Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong unveils a paradigm-shifting approach to cancer treatment that could save millions of lives. In an interview, he revealed we already have the key: protecting the immune system FIRST. The current standard of care—chemotherapy and radiation—often destroys a patient’s lymphocytes (NK & T cells), leading to a condition called lymphopenia. For decades, over 300 studies have shown that lymphopenia predicts early mortality, not just in cancer, but in sepsis and trauma. We treat anemia, but we’ve NEVER had an approved treatment for this critical immune deficiency. Until now. Dr. Soon-Shiong’s “Bio-Shield” is that breakthrough. It’s already approved, and the results are profound: Prostate cancer patients treated with the Bio-Shield before radiation achieved complete remission while their lymphocytes were protected. An ovarian cancer patient received the full, brutal course of chemo after the Bio-Shield. Her cancer disappeared, and she proceeded to surgery with a protected immune system. The vision is simple, yet revolutionary: Mandate that ANY patient undergoing radiation or chemotherapy first receives the Bio-Shield to protect their immune system. The treatment isn’t just attacking the cancer; it’s fortifying the body’s own innate ability to fight and survive. The call to action is clear. We don't need to wait for new regulatory hurdles. We need immediate education for doctors and patients across the nation. We have the power to turn the tide. This is the future of medicine: treating the patient's immune system as the most valuable asset in the fight for their life.

Camus

38,936 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce