« It's the same debate with every new artistic movement. »

Throughout human history, artists have referenced/been inspired by nature and their imagination. AI cannot be inspired, has no imagination and thus cannot create. It cannot draw from nature (yet). It can only reference work already CREATED by other artists.

That’s why history end here in the animation 🫠

🌟 When engineering meets nature's grace, a revolution takes flight... 🦋 Ever heard of the "Butterfly Effect" in gaming chairs? ✨ Introducing X-Air's revolutionary spirit: 💫 The butterfly mechanism ascends - Where precision meets poetry in motion - Your body's perfect dance partner ⚡ Engineering meets artistry: - Three-stage precision tilt locks - Weight-sensitive response system - Custom tension mastery 🎭 Movement reimagined: - Flows like a butterfly - Performs like a champion - Engineered for victory 🎯 Ready to experience true motion? 🌟 Your wings await: 💰 Evolution special: $20 off your transformation! #AndaSeat #XAir #ChairTechnology #GamingInnovation #ErgoDesign 🦋 Float like a butterfly, game like a legend! 🦋

Yes. And the debate itself is not a bad thing as long as we’re actually debating art and not a flood of boring copypasta…

Without the spirit of man nothing will last.

Gif, 1987. A whole format. 🙏

I really love your perspective. In the last weeks many artists were simply blocking EVERYTHING & EVERYONE: "How dare you call it art?" "How dare you be creative?" It is an extremely emotional topic but one thing is clear: Change is inevitable.

Death is inevitable too. That's no reason to stop fighting to live.

Yea exactly

Another outstanding work Raphael

I love your style so much