正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

It’s time to have that conversation… The WWE merging with the UFC has compromised the sport. This was not a real fight. Millions of dollars were wagered behind the scene for this fight to go to decision. Carlos was paid a fortune to not finish this.

422,191 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

11 条评论

Martys Hairline 2.0 的头像
Martys Hairline 2.01 年前

Can anyone show me evidence it’s NOT rigged? Yeah, that’s what I thought…

Big Wes👑💙 Mount Everest🏔 的头像
Big Wes👑💙 Mount Everest🏔1 年前

You gotta be dumb as hell to believe this😂 Carlos got dominated the entire fight and had a short moment

Joshua Shipley 的头像
Joshua Shipley1 年前

Or maybe smoking a pack of cigarettes a day means that you don’t have much stamina after a 25 minute fight

jessy blaze MMA 的头像
jessy blaze MMA1 年前

There was some many opportunities for Carlos to throw hammer first and for whatever reason he just didn’t, brain fart ? Idk

The Punch Report 👊 的头像
The Punch Report 👊1 年前

This is such a reach 🤣 i lost last night too bruh its ok. We’ll get em next time

Chops / Mr. All In 的头像
Chops / Mr. All In1 年前

Watching this live i had those kind of thoughts too but the more I watch this sequence, the more I see that both of them are tired and Garry was trying to get out. Prates was definitely trying to find that kill shot

Jaguar God 的头像
Jaguar God1 年前

Prates was exhausted, dude was getting pieced up for the 4.5 rounds

The Liberation Project 的头像
The Liberation Project1 年前

𝑴𝑺𝑵𝑩𝑪 𝑮𝒖𝒆𝒔𝒕 𝑻𝒆𝒍𝒍𝒔 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝑻𝒓𝒖𝒕𝒉 𝑨𝒃𝒐𝒖𝒕 𝑾𝒆𝒂𝒍𝒕𝒉𝒚 𝑬𝒍𝒊𝒕𝒆𝒔 Scott Galloway, multi-millionaire professor gives dire warning about the decline of American capitalism and wealth inequality. ★ NEW ARTICLE ⬇️

Primal J@y 的头像
Primal J@y1 年前

Marty cmon man 😂. Garry won 3 rds easy

Jason Mayhem Miller 的头像
Jason Mayhem Miller1 年前

You don’t understand what you are talking about, however, i appreciate your passion and support your right to free speech.

Poker Chef Jeff 的头像
Poker Chef Jeff1 年前

Lmao this is the worst take of all time

相关视频

🟡 Hezbollah MP Ibrahim Al-Mousawi: “No one can disagree that the official authorities should have a monopoly on arms — this is one of the definitions of a state. But one of the most important functions of any state is to defend and protect its people. This is what the army should do. This is their duty. What happened in Lebanon is that at no point has Lebanon had an army equipped enough, or one given the political decision by its leaders, to defend or protect Lebanon. This happened again this time — the Lebanese authorities issued orders to the Lebanese army to withdraw from its positions. The villagers of southern Lebanon, Christians, Muslims, were begging the army to stay. The head of the army himself said, ‘I have many different scenarios I can use to defend or to protect.’ But the officials ordered the army not to fight back, not to protect, not to defend, simply to withdraw... The normal function has not been performed by the government or the army. … And more importantly — how did the resistance come about? Why did we go to fight the occupation, to try to liberate, to protect, to defend? Was the Lebanese army there and we just pushed them aside? Of course not. There was a vacuum, a negligence, a recklessness, an abandonment of the people. As long as the occupation continues, the resistance will continue. The resistance has every right to fight back. If the Lebanese army were equipped well enough to fight back, it’s not a hobby that we want to do. It’s not that we want to be killed or whatever. There was a job to be done. The army didn’t do it. The state didn’t do it… We are doing it. We should be thanked for what we are doing, and not delegitimized because of this.” jeremy scahill | Ibrahim Al Moussawi

Drop Site

85,882 次观看 • 5 个月前

WATCH: Secretary of State Rubio smacks down reporter for LYING about his statements from yesterday, falsely claiming he said Israel dragged the U.S. into war with Iran.... Reporter: “Yesterday, you told us that Israel was going to strike Iran and that that's why we needed to get involved. Today, the President said that —” Rubio: “No.” Reporter: “— Iran was going to get strike [sic].” Rubio: “Yeah, your statement is false. So, that's not what — I was asked very specifically. Were you there yesterday?” Reporter: “Yes, I asked a question.” Rubio: “Okay. No. Were you the one that — because somebody asked me a question yesterday, did we go in because of Israel? And I said..., no, I told you this had to happen. Anyway, the President made a decision, and the decision he made was that Iran was not going to be allowed to hide behind its ballistic missile program, that Iran was not going to be allowed to hide behind its ability to conduct these attacks. That decision had been made. The President systematically made a decision to systematically destroy this terrorist capability that they had, and we carried that out. I was very clear on that answer. This was a question of timing, of why this had to happen as a joint operation, not the question of the intent. Once the President made a decision that negotiations were not going to work, that they were playing us on the negotiations, and that this was a threat that was untenable, the decision was made to strike them. That's what I said yesterday. And you guys need to play it. If you're going to play these statements, you need to play the whole statement, not clip it to reach a narrative that you want to do, all right?”

Curtis Houck

15,505 次观看 • 6 个月前