正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

I've been thinking a lot about what the three most significant trials could be for my practice among the many presented this year at #EuroPCR. In general, I prefer it when the primary endpoint is presented for the first time. This is my selection, feel free to disagree.

19,290 次观看 • 3 年前 •via X (Twitter)

8 条评论

Goran Stankovic, MD, PhD 的头像
Goran Stankovic, MD, PhD3 年前

Great choice, Davide, thank you very much ! With the KISS trial, we have an important piece of puzzle for a stepwise provisional strategy in non-LM bifurcations. Now we need to do the LM-KISS, Bernard Chevalier, we are looking forward to it 💯

David J. Cohen, MD, MSc 的头像
David J. Cohen, MD, MSc3 年前

Great choices and high quality summary (as always). My personal recommendation would be to always include the NI margin in the statement of non-inferiority. Also, are the %stenoses flipped on the last results slide (REFORM) or was the NI margin ludicrously large?

Davide Capodanno 的头像
Davide Capodanno3 年前

Thanks David. :) All papers are unpublished so far and the noninferiority margins are not reported (sic). Yes, I also suspect they are quite large. In REFORM, the biolimus-coated balloon was inferior, the percentages are from the original slides and should be correct.

Evandro Martins F. MD 的头像
Evandro Martins F. MD3 年前

@w_jyg So Biolimus A9 coated balloon was inferior to current paclitaxel DCB technology right?

Daniel Paolantonio 的头像
Daniel Paolantonio3 年前

Great ! Thank for share this !!!

Cardiac Research 的头像
Cardiac Research3 年前

Lovely summaries- thank you!

NSCHBC 的头像
NSCHBC3 年前

Thanks for sharing!

Jean-Paul Herzog 的头像
Jean-Paul Herzog3 年前

@Sticchi_Alex Nicely done !

相关视频