Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

I've been thinking a lot about what the three most significant trials could be for my practice among the many presented this year at #EuroPCR. In general, I prefer it when the primary endpoint is presented for the first time. This is my selection, feel free to disagree.

19,289 views • 3 years ago •via X (Twitter)

8 Comments

Goran Stankovic, MD, PhD's profile picture
Goran Stankovic, MD, PhD3 years ago

Great choice, Davide, thank you very much ! With the KISS trial, we have an important piece of puzzle for a stepwise provisional strategy in non-LM bifurcations. Now we need to do the LM-KISS, Bernard Chevalier, we are looking forward to it 💯

David J. Cohen, MD, MSc's profile picture
David J. Cohen, MD, MSc3 years ago

Great choices and high quality summary (as always). My personal recommendation would be to always include the NI margin in the statement of non-inferiority. Also, are the %stenoses flipped on the last results slide (REFORM) or was the NI margin ludicrously large?

Davide Capodanno's profile picture
Davide Capodanno3 years ago

Thanks David. :) All papers are unpublished so far and the noninferiority margins are not reported (sic). Yes, I also suspect they are quite large. In REFORM, the biolimus-coated balloon was inferior, the percentages are from the original slides and should be correct.

Evandro Martins F. MD's profile picture
Evandro Martins F. MD3 years ago

@w_jyg So Biolimus A9 coated balloon was inferior to current paclitaxel DCB technology right?

Daniel Paolantonio's profile picture
Daniel Paolantonio3 years ago

Great ! Thank for share this !!!

Cardiac Research's profile picture
Cardiac Research3 years ago

Lovely summaries- thank you!

NSCHBC's profile picture
NSCHBC3 years ago

Thanks for sharing!

Jean-Paul Herzog's profile picture
Jean-Paul Herzog3 years ago

@Sticchi_Alex Nicely done !

Related Videos