正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

I've watched Luigi Vendittelli's S4 documentary, and every Bob Lazar interview that's come out in the past couple of weeks. In my opinion, Jesse Michels's is hands down the best of them all. But I think my favorite part was Jesse's dozen-plus minute digression into explaining the exotic properties...

69,193 次观看 • 3 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Bob Lazar allegedly watched people fly a UFO at Area 51. “They knew how to fly it.” “The craft had a corona discharge glow on the bottom and lifted off silently up into the sky … ” And it had one shocking, anomalous effect that still perplexes him to this day: As Lazar watched, his supervisor Dennis Mariani told him to go stand directly underneath the craft. “I walked out underneath it and … I looked up, and I couldn’t see the craft.” “I thought it flew away.” “Then he said to come back, and I walked back.” “I see the edge of the craft.” “If you move, you can see it, and if you walk underneath it, you can’t.” “So you can clearly see it’s bending the light.” “You can see the sky above the craft, so you can see that it’s in its little envelope.” Lazar was also convinced that someone was actually inside the craft as it flew. “I did notice there was a … VHF radio.” “And they’re in communication.” “It made me almost positive that there was somebody in the craft.” He heard a voice coming “from the VHF radio, but presumably coming from the craft.” “They must have had some instrumentation set up in the craft, because he was monitoring something.” “I was stuck on the fact that, how is a radio wave of getting into the craft?” “This doesn’t even make any sense.” “It should be distorted by the gravity wave going around it.” “Clearly, they’ve had a lot of time with this craft already.” “It could have been decades for all I know.” “They knew how to fly it.” “These guys were somewhat proficient with it.” Jesse Michels asked Lazar if that means that we actually have “alien reproduction vehicles, or UFOs that humans can fly?” Lazar: “I do not think so, no.” Michels: “So you think we can test these things and use them in rudimentary ways, but we don’t understand how they work?” Lazar: “It’s like the analogy … you can go back to the 1800s and drop off a motorcycle with the keys in it.” “If you tinker with it long enough, someone’s gonna turn the key and it’s gonna start.” “Eventually … they’ll become proficient at driving it.” “But when it runs out of fuel, we’re done.” “And … they can’t even make that plastic fender.” “I think that’s where we are [with UFOs].” “We had some knowledge of that, but I think if we had developed that technology, we would’ve absolutely already seen it.” Jesse Michels American Alchemy

Holden Culotta

174,546 次观看 • 3 个月前

THE MORPHING STORY OF ALIEN ISOTOPE "115" Of all the rote things Bob Lazar fans repeat about his claims, among the most wildly erroneous is the assertion that Lazar has "always told the same story." Most who have really studied early Lazar materials (as opposed to the greatly cleaned up narratives peddled by such storytellers as George Knapp and Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Corbell) find the "same story" assertion to be truly laughable. Offhand, I cannot think of a significant element of Bob Lazar's UFO-related tales, or his claims about his own background, on which Lazar has NOT made contradictory statements. It is not just that Lazar has lied promiscuously--he has also lied lazily, trusting that his promoters will smooth things over, as indeed they have, from the beginning, and decade after decade. The examples are innumerable--Lazar's educational and scientific credentials, his criminal history, the nature of his role at the Los Alamos laboratory, et cetera, et cetera. Contemporary promoters such as Joe Rogan have repeatedly embraced and amplified cleaned-up or disproven Lazar claims without apparent awareness of, or evident concern, about their history. Just for example, let's take Lazar's claims about a purported alien isotope that he said defeats gravity and churns out power like the sun. Lazar claims to have figured out the secrets of this material while working as a physicist for a super-secret government program that supposedly possessed nine intact alien craft, at least one of which, he said, was being flown (in 1989!). He claimed also to possess/control a quantity of this alien material. This claim has been featured for decades in Lazar-promoting narratives such as Jeremy Corbell's 2018 film "Bob Lazar: Area 51 & Flying Saucers." See also the clip from a 2014 George Knapp speech below. Lazar claimed this miraculous substance is a stable isotope of "Element 115," the element with 115 protons, now officially known as moscovium (symbol: Mc). No such stable isotope is known to science; the five lab-created isotopes of moscovium all have half-lives that are fractions of a second. But the concept of a "stable isotope of Element 115" postulates that some certain number of neutrons would constitute an isotope that would endure indefinitely and would also, in Lazar’s tale, somehow manifest both gravity-defeating and sun-like power-producing properties. For those who know Lazar’s history only through the streamlined narratives promoted by Knapp, Corbell, and other storytellers, it may come as a surprise that Lazar has contradicted himself about both the number of protons and the number of neutrons in the purported super-powered alien substance. Yet those are the very two variables that define, respectively, an element, and an isotope of an element. In a Sept. 22, 1990 interview with author Michael Lindemann, Lazar said, "I was the one who identified 115. That was my only contribution to the project. And I don't stand on the fact that it's 115, but if it's not, it's 114. It's right in there." So here we see Lazar, early on, claiming to have identified ‘Element 115’ as the substance that made the alien craft work--except he was not even sure that the element in question had 115 protons! It might have 114! "It's right in there"! Yet the number of protons is, of course, what defines an element in the first place. This 1990 statement by itself is sufficient to make the entire "Element 115" tale laughable. But that's not all. A given element can have very different properties depending on the number of neutrons. An isotope is defined precisely by the number of neutrons. Yet Lazar has also said contradictory things about the number of neutrons in the alien isotope. "Atomic mass" can mean several things depending on context, but when shown as a whole number (no decimal) for a specific isotope, it is understood to mean "mass number"-- that is, the sum of the number of protons plus the number of neutrons. Around 1989, Lazar told his pal Joe Vaninetti that the mass of the alien substance was 271; if the super-isotope had 115 protons, that would mean it had 156 neutrons. Yet many later years on his United Nuclear website, Lazar sold mugs and T-shirts blazoned with a diagram for what he then called "Lazarium" (his modest nomenclature for "Element 115"), but showing the "atomic mass" of the alien isotope as 299--so that would be 184 neutrons. 156? 184? Bob Lazar smuggled in 28 additonal neutrons to his original alien isotope. Why might he have done that? Perhaps because, in between those two incompatible claims, element 115 was actually synthesized for the first time, in Russia, in 2003. To date, five isotopes have been synthesized, with neutron numbers ranging from 171 to 175, and within that observed series the half-life INCREASED along with mass number. Especially in light of that real-world data, Lazar’s 1989 neutron number of 156 seemed especially implausible. His subsequent adoption of a much higher number, 184, moved his story into the neutron-rich region that nuclear theory associates with increased stability in superheavy nuclei. We should not be surprised that a scientist-impersonating serial scam artist churns out contradictory nonsense--but please, don't tell us that he has been consistent in his fabrications. Protons and neutrons aside, consider this: Bob Lazar has long claimed to have personal possession or control of a quantity of this super-powered alien substance--but in over 30 years, he has never submitted samples to independent labs. Think of that--the man has claimed to possess a gravity-defeating isotope that cannot have been made by the hand of man. This claim, if true, would constitute undeniable physical proof of alien visitation and alien technology! Why are so many expending so much energy into searching out and arguing about debatable observations and fuzzy videos, IF there is physical proof in hand? Why don't Lazar and his promoters not schedule a televised press conference next week and, in full view of the world audience, turn over slivers of the alien isotope to three independent labs, at least one foreign (in France, maybe)? If the story were true, "disclosure" would soon follow, with vindication, awards and honors for all involved, and so forth. Yes, I am aware of the assertion that somehow Lazar's control of the alien isotope has been a guarantee of his personal safety from government goons (for over 30 years!), but that is manifestly utter nonsense. If such a substance existed, any danger would attach to its continued possession, and would be obviated by its public revelation under TV lights and subsequent proof by independent analyses. At that point, the genie would be out of the bottle, the "whistleblower" vindicated and safe, with accolades and awards flowing in from across the globe. The purported alien-tech "gatekeepers" would be jumping off bridges. But that press conference and those lab analyses will never happen, because the Lazar-Knapp-Corbell "Element 115" sub-story is a gullibility test, which so many continue to flunk. Looking at you, Joe Rogan. But if you disagree, then it is not too late to take up the cry: Disclosure now! Free the alien isotope!

D. Dean Johnson

18,422 次观看 • 3 个月前

here's how I got into futures trading for the first time and ran my account from $3k to $600k. so I just came across my old IG story highlight from around this time last year. no stoplosses just longing BTC and majors at every pullback at one point I was up and down $300k-$700k on some days, yet still didn't have a real idea on any system for myself. this was the true definition of left curving, before left curving became a term. learned a lot from this run, and I know I can do it again. the hard part about this was that I was sharing updates inside kaizen when i was on this tear, but i was still learning myself and unsure of what i was doing. i've been spending the last few weeks really exploring and learning the whole trading niche. i thought for the longest time, my biggest disdvantage was that i didn't have the trading experience and background a lot of the guys in the space already have, but i've come to realize this is gonna be my edge. as im learning, i have the best perspective as a beginner and can make sense of complicated topics. in 2026 I hope to be one of the few creators who can really democratize trading for mass retail in a responsible (non - gambly way). Currently in my student learning arc and studying some of the best traders I know while building tools, frameworks, & utilizing AI in between all that. if anyone has any tips or recommend any other traders with proven reliable systems in futures and crypto - feel free to connect or shoot me a dm! i'm eager to learn as much as i can here so we can build something phenomenal

Brian Jung

86,287 次观看 • 8 个月前

"Bob Lazar and John Lear, I wouldn't put any stock in anything they say because they're a couple of nut cases. George (Knapp) knows, on a private basis, that Bob Lazar is a problem." ~Dr. Eric Davis ~ Zed: "What is the likelihood that instead of seeing a UFO near Groom Lake - as Bob Lazar and John Lear claimed - what is the likelihood they instead saw some type of directed-energy, proton or laser beam back in the 1980s, rather than a UFO?" (Never heard that before? Circa 1998, Tom Mahood wrote a very detailed takedown of Lazar and proposed that Lazar, Lear and friends saw the testing of proton beam on Wednesday nights, and NOT a UFO) Mahood: "I also need to discuss what those glowing objects, seen by many over Groom Lake, actually were. They were, as I apparently didn’t lay out forcefully enough 20 years ago, the result of the operation of a proton beam device. I repeat….THEY WERE GODDAMNED PARTICLE BEAMS!!!" ~Davis Disagrees~ The Chances They Saw a Test of a Proton Beam? Davis: "Zero, because there were no technology of that nature back then, especially at Area 51. Protons were not used, and lasers were, but laser work was done in another part of the country, at another laboratory. And Area 51 doesn't have a laboratory to begin with. It's not a laboratory. So, the answer is zero. "And Bob Lazar and John Lear, I wouldn't put any stock in anything they say because they're a couple of nut cases. And we already know that George Knapp investigated Bob Lazar, and as much as he'd been promoting him over the years, George knows, on a private basis, that Bob Lazar is a problem. "And I've investigated (Lazar) with a former Area 51 program manager who's a member of the Roadrunners retiree association. He knew Bob Lazar's female supervisor, and he got the poop on Bob Lazar's employment, which did not take place in Area 51. It took place in an unclassified, logistical support facility, way outside of Area 51. He never had to fly...take a Janet flight out there. He stayed in Vegas. He worked from Vegas. "And then he ran an illegal prostitution operation at the same time (laughs). That's how you do forensic profiling. We're not saying he's a criminal, it's just a profiling of somebody who's made outrageous claims, which everybody at Area 51 are looking at each other like, 'What the f**k?' And then you got George Knapp, who's promoting him a lot. He has said, 'So what the f**k?' But he just kind of says, 'Well, you've got the story.' "But, I think George is missing a beat somewhere, and I'm not sure why. He knows all the people I worked with who investigated Bob Lazar, and that includes Colonel John Alexander, or Dr. John Alexander, Colonel US Army retired, who was responsible for Bob Bigelow hiring me at NIDS in July of 1996 "And so, John Alexander was right out of Los Alamos at the time. He was the father of the non-lethal weapons laboratory at Los Alamos. And he did that after 32, maybe more than 32 years in the Army. And you know, when you're the chief of staff to the commanding general of the Army Intelligence and Security Command, you can pull a lot of resources in the government to look into guys like Lazar, and he did. He did when he looked into Phil Corso, so..."

Joe Murgia

35,594 次观看 • 10 个月前

THE MOST IMPORTANT Q&A OF MEDIA DAY. Mariana: You came from a very solid weekend on top of everything, but at the same time, it seems that you don't feel that the team is listening to you. Am I right? And how do you balance that? Lewis: I feel like we're going in the right direction. Rome wasn't built in one day, so it takes time to build. For me, coming into the team, I wanted to be respectful of the way they've done things in the past and just to really observe and see where our strengths and where our weaknesses are and to highlight where our weaknesses are and areas that we need to work on. But I do feel that they've been responding. I think you're starting to see, hopefully, some of the impact of the work that we're doing in the background and also into next year's car. This is a car that I've had nothing to do with in terms of developing this car over the years. Hopefully, from next year, my input goes into that car, and that will be a car that I've hopefully been a part of or will have been a part of developing. But I think we've got a really great rapport. I think we're really progressing, particularly since the summer break. I think things have started to get better, and it's all just about building trust and communication. Also, I'm coming into a team that English is not the first language, and I don't speak Italian, so it's finding a common ground. And the fact is we all want to win. We're all here to achieve the same thing, and we've got to just keep pushing. So that's why I'm trying to keep everyone motivated on difficult weekends, trying to keep everyone lifted up. But there have been many, many things we've changed this year that I suggested that they hadn't done in the past, and so they have been listening. It doesn't change straight away, just like that. It takes time to build. And as engineers, they really need proof. They need numbers. That's what they work on. So you have to sometimes push to get certain changes to be made, and then when you change it and then it works, you're like, okay. Mariana: That's what I was talking about.. Lewis: Yeah! - F1 2025 Mexico -

sim

170,303 次观看 • 9 个月前